Uploaded by Edmundo Soliman

SOLIMAN-Evolutionary-Biology-Activity-No.-3

advertisement
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
EXERCISE NO. 3
BASES OF CLADISTICS
PROCEDURE
Taxonomic ranking based on cladistics
In this activity, you will create a taxonomic ranking based on the given proposed
cladogram of chordates proposed below. Free answers are given below as your
starting point.
Image from Wikipedia (2021) – Phylum Chordata cladogram
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Cephalocohordata
Clade: Olfactores
Genus: Haikouella (extinct)
Subphylum: Tunicata
Class: Appendicularia
Class: Thaliacea
Class: Ascidiacea
Clade: Craniata
Superclass: Cyclostomata (undetermined linkage)
Class: Myxini
Class: Hyperoartia
Clade: ????? (undetermined linkage)
Class: Conodonta (extinct)
Class: Pteraspidomorphi (extinct)
Class: Cephalaspidomorphi (extinct)
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Class: Placodermi (extinct)
Clade: Eugnathostomata (crown gnathostomata)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|1
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Cephalocohordata
Class: Amphioxus
Clade: Olfactores
Genus: Haikouella (extinct)
Subphylum: Tunicata
Class: Appendicularia
Class: Thaliacea
Class: Ascidiacea
Clade: Craniata
Superclass: Cyclostomata (undetermined linkage)
Class: Myxini
Class: Hyperoartia
Clade: ????? (undetermined linkage)
Class: Conodonta (extinct)
Class: Pteraspidomorphi (extinct)
Class: Cephalaspidomorphi (extinct)
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Class: Placodermi (extinct)
Clade: Eugnathostomata (crown gnathostomata)
Class: Acanlhodii (extinct)
Class: Aclinopterygii
Clade: Osteichthyes
Class: Actinopterygii
Clade: Sarcopterygii
Super Class: Actinistia
Clade: ????? (undetermined linkage)
Class: Dipnoi
Infraphylum: Tetrapoda
Class: Amphibia
Clade: Amniotes
Class: Mammalia
Clade: Sauropsida
Class: Archosauromorpha
Class: Lepidosauromorpha
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|2
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
https://natmus.humboldt.edu/exhibits/plants-history/evolution-land-plants
Note:
-
Land plants – clade Embryophyta
Vascular plants – clade Tracheophyta
Seed plants – clade Spermatophytes
Gymnosperms – clade Acrogymnospermae
Angiosperms – clade Angiospermae
o ANA grade or basal angiosperms (paraphyletic) o
Clade Mesangiospermae - core angiosperms
Group: Algae (paraphyletic)
Clade: Embryophyta (land plants)
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|3
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
Group: Algae (paraphyletic)
Clade: Embryophyta (Land Plants w/ Cuticle), (~420MYA)
Class: (Liverworts)
• Haplomitriopsida
• Marchantiopsida
• Jungermanniopsida
Class: (Hornworts)
• Leiosporocerotopsida
• Anthocerotopsida
Class: (Mosses)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Takakiopsida
Sphagnopsida
Andreaeopsida
Andreaeobryopsida
Oedipodiopsida
Polytrichopsida
Tetraphidopsida
Bryopsida
Clade: Tracheophyta (Vascular Plants w/ Xylem and Phloem),
(~410-375 MYA)
Class: (Lycopods)
• Lycopodiopsida
• Zosterophyllopsida (extinct)
Class: (Ferns and Horsetails)
• Cladoxylopsida (extinct)
• Polypodiopsida
Clade: Spermatophytes (Seed Plants w/ Woody Tissue and Seeds)
Clade: Acrogymnospermae (~300 MYA)
Class: Cycadopsida (Cycads)
Class: Ginkgoopsida (Ginkgo)
Class: Pinopsida (Conifers)
Clade: Angiosperm (w/ Flowers and Carpel), (~120 MYA)
*MYA – Million Years Ago
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|4
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
https://theoneandonlybioproject.weebly.com/eubacteria.html
Domain: Bacteria
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|5
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Firmicutes
Genus: Mycoplasma
Phylum: Actinobacteria
Genus: Actinomycetes
Genus: Clostridium
Phylum: Spirochaetota
Order: Spirochetes
Phylum: Chlorobi
Order: Rhodospirillales (Green Sulfur)
Order: Cyanobacteriales (Cyanobacteria)
Order: Prochlorales (Prochlorophytes)
Order: Chromatiales (Purple Sulfur)
Phylum: Pseudomonadota
Genus: Rhodopseudomonas
Family: Rhodospirillaceae (Purple nonsulfur)
Genus: Desulfovibrios
Order: Rikettsia
Phylum: Myxococcota
Order: Myxococcales
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|6
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
Creating your own monophyletic groupings based on the organisms features
In this activity, you will create a cladogram with the indicated features (refer to
the cladograms above) that will make as much as possible a monophyletic
grouping. You can omit traits that seem to be not relevant to the monophyly.
Otherwise, you can give additional traits not indicated below based on what you
know or have researched that will make the monophyly. Also, you can sort traits
given which is applicable to the taxa given, assuming that those taxa have those
traits. Enjoy!
The Three (3) Domains of Life
Key characteristics
- Eukaryotic cell with two (2) flagella (or
at least have existed once during its
lifecycle)
- Single gene encoding a single protein
enzyme with two separate functions
essential in thymine nucleotide
metabolism
-
Plastids (like chloroplastids,
leukoplastids, chromoplastids,
apicoplastids etc.)
Unique flagella structures
- Almost all doesn‟t have plastids
- Having highly modified mitochondria
to no mitochondria at all
- Cellular structures to support cellular
ingestion of nutrients
- Phagocytic ingestion of foods
- Many have one (1) flagella (or at least
have existed once during its lifecycle)
- Membrane-cytoplasmic structures to
support cytoplasmic extensions
(pseudopodia, filopodia etc.)
Clades
Bikonta
•
• Archaeplastida-Hacrobia-SAR
supergroup
Archaeplastida
•
•
Chromista
Excavata supergroup
•
Discoba
•
•
Loukozoa
•
•
•
Archaeplastida-Hacrobia-SAR
supergroup
Archaeplastida
Chromista
•
•
•
Excavata supergroup
Discoba
Loukozoa
•
•
CRuMs supergroup
Amorphea
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|7
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
-
Chromosomes are linear and found in
the nucleus
Nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum, and
other membrane-bounded organelles
Endosymbionts (mitochondria and
plastids)
Phospholipids chains of the cell
membrane is linear with glycerol
having ester linkages to a fatty acid
Has many form of RNA polymerase
Methionine is used for the initiation of
protein synthesis
Cell wall constitution can be diverse
from organic to mineral origin
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Loukozoa
Bikonta
Archaeplastida-Hacrobia-SAR
supergroup
Archaeplastida
Discoba
Chromista
Eukarya
Excavata supergroup
CRuMs supergroup
•
Amorphea
- Their chloroplasts have chlorophyll
“a” and “b” as the main
photosynthesis pigments
- Main photosynthesis product is made
up of starch
- Almost all are autotrophic
•
Archaeplastida
- Have variety of photosynthetic and
non-photosynthetic plastids with
diverse pigments different from
archaeplastids
- Many are autotrophic while some are
heterotrophic
•
Chromista
- Flagellates and some amoeboid
protists
Distinct “discoid” (disc) shape cristae
of the mitochondria
Most are heterotrophic
•
Discoba
-
- All are heterotrophic
- Flagellate protists with pronounced
cellular “groove” used for feeding
- Many are anaerobic having no
mitochondria, while others have
special organelles acting like a
mitochondria or highly modified
mitochondria
•
Loukozoa
- Heterotrophic flagellates and
amoeboid
- Protists with high nuclear genomic
similarity
•
CRuMs
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|8
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
- “free-form” cells leading to variety of
observed and possible cellular
morphologies of these organisms, if
any external structures (like cell wall,
test casing, lorica etc.) covering the
cells are absent
Heterotrophic
•
Amorphea (Unikonta)
Prokaryotic unicellular organisms
- Circular chromosome found in the
nucleoid region
- Cell membrane phospholipid chain is
linear with its glycerol having ester
linkages to a fatty acid
- Cell wall has peptidoglycan
- Only one kind of RNA polymerase
- Formylmethionine is used for the
initiation of protein synthesis
•
Bacteria
-
-
Prokaryotic unicellular organisms
Circular chromosome found in the
nucleoid region
Cell membrane is made of special
phospholipid where instead of a fatty
acid, a branched phytanyl (isoprene)
• Archaea
chain is ether linked to the glycerol
Cell wall is made up of crystalline-like
layers of proteins or glycoproteins
Has many form of RNA polymerase
Methionine is used for the initiation of
protein synthesis
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|9
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|10
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
Guide Questions
1)
What is the importance of doing cladistics monophyletic groupings
instead of other approaches in taxonomic and evolutionary studies of
different organisms? Explain comprehensively.
- Cladistics is the study and interpretation of evolutionary relationships
between species based on shared or derived traits. Cladistics is regarded
as an important strategy in taxonomy and evolutionary studies since it
allows scientists to categorize organisms based on common ancestry
rather than merely physical similarities. The use of monophyletic groups
in cladistics is important since they reflect the most closely related
creatures and are based on common ancestry (Templeton, 2010). This
signifies that all members of a monophyletic group have a common
ancestor and are more closely related to one another than to organisms
outside the group. In contrast, some techniques, such as paraphyletic
groups, may contain some, but not all, offspring of a common ancestor.
Scientists can better comprehend the evolutionary links between various
creatures and appropriately reflect these ties in taxonomy classifications
by using monophyletic groupings in cladistics. It also contributes to
ensuring that taxonomy classifications are based on evolutionary history
rather than physical similarities (Fristrup, 2001).
2)
Explain the problems or difficulties you have encountered in
interpretation and creation of cladograms and use of cladistics as basis
of taxonomic ranking.
- When characters with multiple states are used, the method has a
circularity that makes it biased. Coding of such features can only be done
using prior criteria, and this is normally done using an established
phylogenetic system. The way that character state coding handles diversity
among species is another issue. Although paleoanthropologists typically
neglect this type of variation, when characteristics are acknowledged as
fluctuating, their presentation as a distinct state adds a significant
amount of inaccuracy to cladograms. Cladistics is the favored approach
for taxonomic "splitters," according to certain experts who are against its
usage and who assert that it has revived typology. Regardless of the
adoption or use of cladistics, typology continues to be an element of
research on the evolution of humans.
3)
Choose one of the cladograms (including the one you have made) and
analyze some inconsistencies (taxon problems) you have found based
on recent findings. Explain comprehensively only one taxon problem
and your given possible solution to it.
Identifying which character states are derived and which are primitive
is the goal of cladistic analysis. Hennig (1966) and others developed a
number of techniques for achieving this, but the outgroup comparison
-
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|11
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
technique is the most popular one now in use. In outgroup comparison,
if a taxon that is not a part of the group of organisms being classed has a
character state that is the same as some of the creatures in the group,
then that character state might be deemed to be plesiomorphic. The
organisms being classed are the ingroup, while the outside taxon is
referred to as the outgroup.
Two arguments can be made to justify using this method: one based on
what we believe about evolutionary process and the other on logic:
1. The only way a homologous feature could be present in both an ingroup
and an outgroup, would be for it to have been inherited by both from an
ancestor older than the ancestor of just the ingroup
2. Consider the following example in which a character has states a and
b.
When a character only has two states, it is very easy to distinguish
between primitive and derived states: the state that is found in the
outgroup is primitive, while the one that is exclusively found in the
ingroup is derived.
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Page|12
BIOL 30115 – Evolutionary Biology
Mapanao & Reboa
REFERENCES
Bremer K. (1990). COMBINABLE COMPONENT CONSENSUS. Cladistics : the
international journal of the Willi Hennig Society, 6(4), 369–372.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1990.tb00551.x
Curnoe
D.
(2003).
Problems
with
the
use
of
cladistic
analysis
in
palaeoanthropology. Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende
Forschung
am
Menschen,
53(3),
225–234.
https://doi.org/10.1078/0018-442x-00048
Fristrup, K. M. (2001). A History of Character Concepts in Evolutionary Biology.
The
Character
Concept
in
Evolutionary
Biology,
13–35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012730055-9/50010-0
Templeton, A. (2010). The Diverse Applications of Cladistic Analysis of Molecular
Evolution, with Special Reference to Nested Clade Analysis. International
Journal
of
Molecular
Sciences,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11010124
11(1),
124–139.
Download