LAW ON SALES AND AGENCY - MIDTERM WHAT ARE THE MODES OR CAUSES FOR EXTINGUISHMENT OF SALE? COMMON – those causes which are also the means of extinguishing all other contracts like payment, loss of the thing, condonation, etc. (see Art. 1231.); SPECIAL – those causes which are recognized by the law on sales (such as those covered by Arts. 1484, 1532, 1539, 1540, 1542, 1556, 1560, 1567, and 1591.); and EXTRA-SPECIAL – those causes which are given special discussion by the Civil Code and these are conventional redemption and legal redemption CONVENTIONAL REDEMPTION DEFINE CONVENTIONAL REDEMPTION Conventional redemption is the right which the vendor reserves to himself, to reacquire the property sold provided he: Reimburse the vendee of (a) the price, (b) the expenses of the contract, (c) any other legitimate payments made therefor, and (d) the necessary and useful expenses made on the thing sold (Art. 1616.); and Fulfills other stipulations which may have been agreed upon. (Art. 1601.) WHAT IS THE NATURE OF CONVENTIONAL REDEMPTION? It is purely contractual right because it is created, not by mandate of the law, but by virtue of an express contract; It is an accidental stipulation and, therefore, its nullity cannot affect the sale itself since the latter might be entered into without said stipulation It is a real right because when registered, it bind third persons (Art. 1608); It is a potestative condition because it depends upon the will of the vendor (see Art. 1182.); It is a resolutory condition because when exercised, the right of ownership acquired by the vendee is extinguished (see Art. 1179.); It is not an obligation but a power or privilege that the vendor has reserved for himself; and It is reserved at the moment of the perfection of the contract for if the right to repurchase is agreed upon afterwards, there is only a promise to sell which produces different rights and effects. (see 10 Manresa 311.) WHEN IS A CONTRACT OF SALE WITH A RIGHT TO REPURCHASE (PACTO DE RETRO SALE) PRESUMED AN EQUITABLE MORTGAGE? In the following cases or instances: When the price of a sale with right to repurchase is unusually inadequate; When the vendor remains in possession as lessee or otherwise; When upon or after the expiration of the right to repurchase another instrument extending the period of redemption or granting a new period is executed; When the purchaser retains for himself a part of the purchase price; When the vendor binds himself to pay the taxes on the thing sold; and In any other case where it may be fairly inferred that the real intention of the parties is that the transaction shall secure the payment of a debt or the performance of any other obligation. (Art. 1602.) Note: In any of the foregoing cases, any money, fruits or other benefit to be received by the vendee as rent or otherwise shall be considered as interest. The price paid by the supposed buyer is considered the principal of a loan and any money, etc. received by him thereafter is considered as interest of said loan. DEFINE EQUITABLE MORTGAGE An equitable mortgage is one which, although it lacks the proper formalities of a mortgage, shows the intention of the parties to make the property subject of the contract of sale with a right to repurchase as security for a debt. Note: In case of doubt, a contract purporting to be a sale with right of repurchase shall be construed as an equitable mortgage. (Art. 1603.) WITHIN WHAT PERIOD MUST THE RIGHT TO REPURCHASE IN CONVENTIONAL REDEMPTION BE EXERCISED? 1. If there is no agreement granting the vendor the right to redeem, there is no right of redemption since the sale should be considered an absolute sale. 2. If the parties agree only on the right to redeem on the part of the vendor but there is a total absence of express stipulation as to the time within which the repurchase should be made, then the period of redemption shall be four (4) years from the date of the contract. 3. If the parties agree on a definite period of redemption, then the right to redeem must be exercised within the period fixed provided it does not exceed 10 years. 4. If the parties agree that the vendor shall have a right to redeem and they intend a period which, however, is not specified (e.g., “at any time the vendor has the money”), then the redemption period is 10 years. 5. “From the time final judgment was rendered in a civil action on the basis that the contract was a true sale with right to repurchase,” the vendor a retro has 30 days within which to exercise the right to repurchase. (Art. 1606.) MAY THE PERIOD OF REDEMPTION BE EXTENDED BY STIPULATION? After its expiration. – No, because that which is extinguished cannot be extended and because the ownership in the vendee is already consolidated, and becomes absolute. Before its expiration. – Yes, provided the extension including the original term shall not extend beyond 10 years; otherwise, the extension is void as to the excess. IN THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF REPURCHASE, WHAT SHOULD THE VENDOR PAY? 1. The price of the sale; 2. The expenses of the contract, and any other legitimate payments made by reason of the sale; and 3. The necessary and useful expenses made on the thing sold. (Art. 1616.) WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THE FAILURE OF THE VENDOR TO REDEEM? In case of personal property. – The vendee’s title becomes irrevocable; In case of real property. – The consolidation of ownership in the vendee by virtue of the failure of the vendor to comply with the provisions of Article 1616 shall not be recorded in the Registry of Property without a judicial order, after the vendor has been duly heard. (Art. 1607.) Reason: The transaction may not be a genuine pacto de recto but not only an equitable mortgage. WHAT ARE THE RIGHTS OF THE VENDEE A RETRO? 1. To be subrogated to the vendor’s rights and actions (Art. 1609.); and 2. To compel the vendor of a part of an undivided immovable to redeem the whole property in case the vendee a retro of such part acquires the entire immovable. (Art. 1611; see Art. 498.) Purpose of law: to discourage coownership. LEGAL REDEMPTION DEFINE LEGAL REDEMPTION Legal redemption is the right to be subrogated, upon the same terms and conditions stipulated in the contract, in the place of one who acquires a thing by purchase or dation in payment, or by any other transaction whereby ownership is transmitted by onerous title. (Art. 1619.) GIVE INSTANCES OF LEGAL REDEMPTION. Redemption by a co-heir of the share sold by the other heir (Art. 1088.); Redemption by a co-owner (Art. 1620.); Redemption by an adjoining owner of a piece of rural land (Art. 1621.) or urban land (Art.1622.); Redemption by a debtor in case of sale of right in litigation (Art. 1634.); and (5)Under special laws (among others): o Redemption by owner of real property sold for delinquent taxes. The period is one (1) year (NIRC, Secs. 326, 328.); o Repurchase by homesteader of homestead sold under the Public Land Act. The period is five (5) years (Com. Act No. 141, Sec. 119.); o Redemption by judgment debtor or redemptioner of property sold on execution. The period is 12 months (Rules of Court, Rule 39, Sec. 29.); (d)Redemption by mortgagor after mortgaged property has been judicially foreclosed and sold. The period is within 90 days but before confirmation of sale by the court (Ibid., Rule 68, Sec. 3.); and o Redemption by mortgagor after mortgaged property has been extrajudicially foreclosed and sold. The period is within one (1) year from the registration of the sale. (Act No. 3135, Sec. 16.) REQUISITES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF LEGAL REDEMPTION BY A CO-OWNER. 1. There must be a co-ownership; 2. There must be alienation of all or of any of the shares of the other co-owners; 3. The sale must be to a stranger (Art. 1620.); and 4. (4)The sale must be made before partition. (Art. 1088.) REQUISITES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF LEGAL REDEMPTION OF RURAL LANDS BY ADJOINING OWNERS. 1. Both the land of the one exercising the right of redemption and the land sought to be redeemed must be rural; 2. The lands must be adjacent; 3. There must be an alienation; 4. The piece of rural land alienated must not exceed one (1) hectare; 5. The vendee must already own some rural land; and 6. The rural land sold must not be separated by brooks, drains, ravines, roads and other apparent servitudes from the adjoining lands. (Art. 1621.) REQUISITES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF LEGAL REDEMPTION OF URBAN LANDS BY ADJOINING OWNERS. 1. The one exercising the right must be an adjacent owner; 2. The piece of land sold must be so small and so situated that a major portion thereof cannot be used for any practical purpose within a reasonable time; and 3. Such urban land was bought by its owner merely for speculation. (Art. 1622.) Note: Article 1622 also gives the adjoining owner the right of pre-emption, which is the right of purchasing before others. It is exercised before the sale or resale against the would-be vendor. The right of redemption of co-owners is preferred over that of adjoining owners. (Art. 1623.) WHEN MUST THE RIGHT OF LEGAL PRE-EMPTION OR REDEMPTION BE EXERCISED? Within 30 days from notice in writing by the prospective vendor or by the vendor, as the case may be. ASSIGNMENT OF CREDITS AND OTHER INCORPOREAL RIGHTS DEFINE ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT Assignment of credit is a contract by which one person transfers to another his rights and actions against a third person in consideration of a price certain in money or its equivalent (see Arts. 1624, 1458.) Note: It is a consensual, bilateral, onerous, and commutative or aleatory contract. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT? It is really a sale – a sale of credit – and is, therefore, governed by the law on sale. There is, however, one important difference and that is, after the transfer, a definite third person is obliged; whereas, in sale, the subject is the whole world which must respect the title of the buyer. GIVE THE FORMALITIES REQUIRED OF A VALID ASSIGNMENT. 1. As between the parties. – The assignment is valid although it appears in a private document so long as the law does not require a specific form for its validity. 2. As against third persons. – To affect them, the assignment must appear in a public instrument, and in case it involves real property, that it be recorded in the Registry of Property. (Art. 1625.) GIVE THE EFFECTS OF A VALID ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT. 1. The assignment transfers title to the assigned credit to the assignee; 2. It includes all the accessory rights, such as guaranty, mortgage, pledge, or preference. 3. The assignee takes the credit subject to defenses which may have been acquired by the debtor before notice of the assignment. (see Art. 1626.) IN AN ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT, IS THE CONSENT OF THE DEBTOR ESSENTIAL? No. The law contemplates only notice to the debtor for the protection of the assignee. So, the debtor who, before having knowledge of the assignment, pays his creditor, shall be released from the obligation. WHAT ARE THE WARRANTIES OF AN ASSIGNOR OF CREDIT? 1. The existence of the credit; and 2. The legality of the credit, unless it should have been sold as doubtful. There is no warranty as to the solvency of the debtor unless it has been expressly stipulated or unless the insolvency was prior to the sale and of common knowledge. WHAT ARE THE LIABILITIES OF AN ASSIGNOR OF CREDIT? For violation of the above warranties: If in good faith, he is only liable for (a) the price received and (b) the expenses of the contract and (c) any other legitimate payments by reason of the assignment. If in bad faith, he is also liable for damages. (Arts. 1628, 1616.) WHAT IS THE DURATION OF THE ASSIGNOR’S LIABILITY WHERE THE DEBTOR’S SOLVENCY IS EXPRESSLY WARRANTED? If there is stipulation, then for the term or period fixed; (2)If there is no stipulation: a. For one year from the assignment of the credit when the period for payment of the credit has expired; or b. For one year after its maturity, when such period for payment has not yet expired.(Art. The above apply if the assignor acted in good faith. REQUISITES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF LEGAL REDEMPTION BY THE DEBTOR IN CASE OF SALE OF CREDIT OR OTHER INCORPOREAL RIGHT IN LITIGATION. 1. There must be a sale or assignment of a credit; 2. There must be a pending litigation at the time of the assignment; and 3. The debtor must pay the assignee (a) the price paid by him; (b) the judicial costs incurred by him; and (c) the interest on the price from the date the assignee demands payment from him. (Art. 1634.) Note: The object of the law in allowing redemption by the debtor is to avoid the sale of credits in litigation merely for speculation. There is no right of redemption if the credit in litigation is sold: a. To a co-heir or co-owner of the right assigned; b. To a creditor in payment of his credit; or c. To the possessor of a tenement or piece of land which is subject to the right in litigation assigned. AGENCY – NATURE, FORM AND KINDS OF AGENCY DEFINE AGENCY. Agency is a contract whereby a person binds himself to render some service or to do something in representation or on behalf of another, with the consent or authority of the latter. Note: It is consensual (exception: Art. 1874, infra.), nominate, bilateral (unilateral, if gratuitous), principal, and preparatory contract. WHAT IS THE BASIS OF AGENCY? Agency is also a representative relation. Representation constitutes its basis. By this legal fiction of representation, the actual absence of the principal is transferred into legal or juridical presence. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF AGENCY? The purpose is to extend the personality of the principal. It enables the activity of man which is naturally limited in its exercise by the imposition of his physiological conditions to be extended, permitting him to perform diverse acts at the same time in different places. WHO ARE THE PARTIES TO A CONTRACT OF AGENCY? 1. Principal. – one whom the agent represents and from whom he derives his authority; he is the person represented; and 2. Agent. – one who acts for and represents another; he is the person acting in a representative capacity. Note: The principal is sometimes called employer, constituent, or chief. The agent is frequently called an attorney, or an attorney-in-fact, and occasionally is spoken of as a proxy, delegate, or representative WHAT ACTS MAY BE DELEGATED TO AN AGENT? Generally, what a man may do in person, he may do through another. Some acts, however, cannot be done through an agent, e.g., those which are purely personal in nature, like the right to vote during election and those which are illegal. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE RELATION BETWEEN PRINCIPAL AND AGENT? The relation is fiduciary in character since it is based on trust and confidence. Hence, the agent is estopped from asserting or acquiring a title to the subject matter of the agency adverse to that of the principal. DISTINGUISH AGENCY FROM SIMILAR CONTRACTS OR RELATIONS. 1. Loan. – A borrower is given money (a) for purposes of his own (in agency, to advance principal’s business) and he must generally (b) return it whether or not his business is successful. 2. Lease of service. – the (a) basis is employment and the lessor (like a servant) ordinarily (b) performs only ministerial (not discretionary) functions. 3. Contract for a piece of work. – The independent contractor exercise his employment independently and not in representation of the employer. 4. Partnership. – A partner acts not only for his copartners and the partnership but also as a principal for himself (in agency, agents acts only for his principal.) 5. Negotiorum gestio. – It is (a) a quasi-contract; (b) the gestio acts without authority and knowledge of the owner of the property of business although according to his (c) presumed (not express) will by exercising “all the diligence of a good father of a family. In both, however, there is representation. Note: If a person comes to know that another is acting in his behalf without authority but he does not repudiate, there is implied agency. 6. Sale. – In sale (as distinguished from agency to sell), the buyer (a) receives the goods as owner, (b) pays the price (the agent delivers the proceeds of the sale), (c) can deal with the thing as he pleases being the owner (the agent, according to the instructions of the principal), and (d) as a general rule, cannot return the object sold. 7. Brokerage. – A broker is merely (a) an intermediary between the purchaser and the vendor whose only office is to bring together the parties to the transaction and has (b) no relation to the thing he buys or sells, while a (commission) agent maintains a relation not only with his principal and the purchaser or vendor but also with the property the subject matter of the transaction which is placed in his possession and at his disposal in accordance with his authority. 8. Relations between guardian and ward. – While the guardian acts for and on behalf of his ward, he does not, however, derive his authority to act from the ward. HOW MAY AGENCY BE CLASSIFIED? 1. As to manner of its creation: a. Express. – one where the agent has been actually authorized by the principal either orally or in writing (Art. 1869.); b. Implied. – one which is implied from the acts of the principal, from his silence or lack of action, or his failure to repudiate the agency, knowing that another person as acting on his behalf without authority. 2. As to its character: a. Gratuitous. – one where the agent receives no compensation for his services (Art. 1875.); or b. Compensated or onerous. – one where the agent receives compensation for his services. Agency is presumed to be for a compensation. (Art. 1875.) 3. As to extent of business covered: a. General. – one which compromises all the business of the principal (Art. 1876.); or b. Special. – one which compromises one or more specific transactions. 4. As to authority conferred: a. Couched in general terms. – one which is created in general terms and is deemed to comprise only acts of administration (Art. 1877.); or b. Couched in specific terms. – one authorizing only the performance of a specific act or acts. (see Art. 1878.) 5. As to its nature and effects: a. Ostensible or representative. – one where the agent acts in the name and representation of the principal (4 Castan, 4th ed., p. 490.); or b. Simple or commission. – one where the agent acts for the account of the principal but in his own name. Note: Agency may be oral unless the law requires a specific form. (Art. 1869.) (2)When a sale of a piece of land or any interest (like mortgage, usufruct, etc.) is through an agent, the authority of the latter shall be in writing; otherwise, the sale shall be void. (Art. 1874) 2. If by public advertisement. – The agent is considered as such with regard to any person. Public advertisement may be made in any form, through the newspaper, radio, etc., and by posters or billboards. The power shall continue to be in full force until the notice is rescind in the same manner in which it was given. (Art. 1873.) WHEN IS THERE IMPLIED ACCEPTANCE OF AN AGENCY BY AN AGENT? 1. As between persons present. – If the principal (personally) delivers his power of attorney to the agent and the latter receives it without any objection. (Art. 1873.) 2. As between persons absent. a. When the principal transmits his power of attorney to the agent, who receives it without any objection; b. When the principal entrusts to him by letter or telegram a power of attorney with respect to the business in which he is habitually engaged as an agent, and he did not reply to the letter or telegram. (Art. 1872.) Note: A power of attorney may be defined as written authorization to an agent to perform specified acts in behalf of his principal which acts, when performed, shall have binding effect on the principal. (2 Am. Jur. 30.) HOW MANY AGENTS BE CLASSIFIED? 1. Universal. – One authorized to do all acts that the principal may personally do, and which he can lawfully delegate to another the power of doing. 2. General. – One authorized to transact all the business of the principal or to do acts connected with a particular trade, business or employment; and 3. Special or particular. – One authorized to act in one or more specific transactions or to act upon a particular occasion. (Art. 1876.) WHAT ARE THE TWO WAYS BY WHICH THE PRINCIPAL MAY GIVE NOTICE OF THE APPOINTMENT OF AN AGENT? 1. If by special information. – The person appointed as agent is considered such with respect to the person to whom the information was given. DISTINGUISH APPARENT AUTHORITY FROM AUTHORITY BY ESTOPPEL. Apparent authority is that which though not actually granted, the principal knowingly permits the agent to exercise or holds him out as possessing . Authority by estoppel arises in those cases where the principal by his culpable negligence permits his agent to exercise powers not granted to him, even though the principal may have no notice or knowledge of the conduct of the agent. DISTINGUISH IMPLIED AGENCY FROM AGENCY BY ESTOPPEL. 1. In the former, there is an actual agency. The principal alone is liable. 2. In an agency by estoppel, the authority of the agent is not real but only apparent. a. If the estoppel is caused by the principal, he is liable to any third person who relied on the misrepresentation. b. If the estoppel is caused by the agent, then only the agent is liable. GIVE THE LEGAL EFFECT OF AN AGENCY COUCHED IN GENERAL TERMS. Such an agency comprises only acts of administration, (a) even if the principal should state that he withholds no power, or (b) that the agent may execute such acts as he may consider appropriate, or (c) even though the agency should authorize a general and unlimited management. ENUMERATE THE CASES IN WHICH SPECIAL POWERS OF ATTORNEY ARE NECESSARY. 1. To make such payments as are not usually considered as acts of administration; 2. To effect novations which put an end to obligations already in existence at the time the agency was constituted; 3. To compromise, to submit questions to arbitration, to renounce the right to appeal from a judgment, to waive objections to the venue of an action, or to abandon a prescription already acquired; 4. To waive any obligation gratuitously; 5. To enter into any contract by which the ownership of an immovable is transmitted or acquired either gratuitously or for a valuable consideration; 6. To make gifts, except customary ones for charity or those made to employees in the business managed by the agent; 7. To loan or borrow money, unless the latter act be urgent and indispensable for the preservation of the things which are under administration; 8. To lease any real property to another person for more than one year; 9. To bind the principal to render some service without compensation; 10. To bind the principal in a contract of partnership; 11. To obligate the principal as a guarantor or surety; 12. To create or convey real rights over immovable property; 13. To accept or repudiate an inheritance; 14. To ratify or recognize obligations contracted before the agency; and 15. Any other act of strict dominion. (Art. 1878.) Note: The cases enumerated involve acts of strict dominion or ownership as distinguished from acts of administration. A special power to sell excludes the power to mortgage; and a special power to mortgage does not include the power to sell. (Art. 1879.) A special power to compromise does not authorize submission to arbitration. (Art. 1880.) HOW MAY THE AUTHORITY OF AN AGENT BE CLASSIFIED? Express. – when it is conferred by words (Art. 1869.); Implied. – when it is incidental to the transaction or reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose of the agency (Art. 1881.); Apparent ostensible. – when it is conferred by conduct or even by silence. (see Art. 1869.) Ostensible authority is another name for authority by estoppel. It is also an implied authority in the sense that it is not expressly conferred; General. – when it refer to all the business of the principal (see Art. 1876.); (5)Special. – when it is limited only to one or more specific transactions; and STATE THE LEGAL EFFECTS WHERE AN AGENT, BEING AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE PRINCIPAL, ACTS INSTEAD IN HIS OWN NAME. 1. General rule. – The agent is the one directly liable to the person with whom he had contracted as if the transaction were his own. Therefore, the principal and such person have no right of action against each other. 2. Exception. – The principal is bound when the contract involves things belonging to him. The principal may sue the agent for breach of contract. Authority by necessity. – when it is demanded by virtue of the existence of an emergency. REQUISITES IN ORDER THAT THE PRINCIPAL MAY BE BOUND BY THE ACT OF THE AGENT. 1. The agent must act within the scope of his authority; and 2. The agent must act in behalf of the principal. (see Arts. 1881, 1882.) IN WHAT CASES IS THE PRINCIPAL BOUND BY THE ACTS OF AN AGENT WHO EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY? 1. Where his (principal’s) acts have contributed to deceive a third person in good faith. 2. Where the limitations upon the power created by him could not have been known by the third person (see Art. 1900.); 3. Where the principal has placed in the hands of the agent instruments signed by him in blank (Strong, et al. vs. Gutierrez Repide, 6 Phil. 680.); and 4. Where the principal has ratified the acts of the agent. (see Art. 1901.) HOW MAY PRINCIPALS BE CLASSIFIED? 1. Disclosed. – If at the time of the transaction contracted by the agent, the other party thereto has notice that the agent is acting for a principal and of the principal’s identity; 2. Partially disclosed. – If the other party has notice that the agent is or may be acting for a principal but has no notice of the principal’s identity; and 3. Undisclosed. – If the other party has no notice that the agent is acting for the principal. (Restatement of the Law on Agency, Sec. 4, pp. 15-16. )