1. How did the group decide to include Student B’s perspective/lens/
conclusions into the overall presentation?
We decided to include Genetical lenses to our presentation because it poses the long
term permanent solution to our problem. Along with Biological this new Discovery of
using genetics to make immune oranges has brang yet another approach to a cure.
Economical lenses pose the short term instatnaeous solution.
2. What is an example of a compelling argument from one of your peer’s
individual reports that you decided to exclude from your team presentation
and why?
A compelling argument in one of my peers' IRRs that we had to exclude was the fact
that larger industrial growers which are tied in with massive companies can play a
massive role in controlling the Citruss greening. This is due to the huge economic scale
that large corporations run on.
3. What was the strongest counter argument to the solution or conclusion your
team identified and why?
The strongest conclusion that my team identified was finding a scientific cure through
Biological and Genetical means. This is because these solutions are teh cure and the
long term best solution. The incentivizational and Intervention plans which are
economical give a temporary solution to the prtoblem and will only work for a limited
time. The ethical lense gives insight to the problem at hand and team effort for farmers.
4. Having finished your project, what if anything do you consider to be a gap in
your team’s research that, if addressed, would make you feel more confident
about your conclusion?
Something that would be considered a gap in the teams research would have to be the
fact that more research must be done in finding a cure. This is becaue there are still
flaws with the cures which is why CG is still a problem. Although reaserch on the cures
is improving more must be done to identify when these cures are ready and reliable to
use.