Yes, there are many reasons why philosophy remains relevant in the study of law.
Firstly, philosophy allows for the examination of theories and ideas vital to law. From
studying the nature of law to the deconstruction of fallacies and misconceptions in legal
arguments - all of these are tackled in philosophy.
Secondly, intensive legal reasoning is used in every aspect of law. The dismissal of
the value of philosophy, which explores reason itself, is extremely detrimental to one who
wishes to pursue the study of law. As posited by Sunstein, the practice of law is theoryladen. The presence of philosophical inquiries permeates law. Thus, studying philosophy
exposes its learners to a broad and in-depth understanding of the foundations of law:
justice, morality, ethics, epistemology, and social and political philosophy, among many
others. Training in philosophy cultivates the skills that law students and practicing lawyers
need, skills such as comprehending and interpreting abstract concepts and texts, analyzing
complex situations, evaluating evidence, presenting advocacies, and even writing and
speaking with clarity and argumentative rigor.
Finally, it is my stand that philosophy makes a better lawyer. Fernando presupposed
that the function of philosophy is to give a lawyer a better rational understanding of specific
normative issues. Hence, allowing them to create sound and logical judgments that
eventually trickle down to society.