Uploaded by mdashiquzzaman112

Analaysis - 02A Cantilever Load Cell

advertisement
02A – Cantilever Load Cell
08/13/2022
08/16/22
Analaysis
21
Summary
The following report presents various analyses for a cantilever load cell, summarized below. All elements are
quadratic (beam and hexahedrals) with a global size of 0.0525”. The composite plate is E-Fiberglass/Epoxy, FVR
= 67%. The contacting plates are rigid. The beam connections are low alloy steel. Deviations from beam theory
are explained for each analysis.
1. 2D analysis of beam elements.
2. 3D analysis of solid composite plate bonded to rigid plates.
3. 3D analysis of solid composite plate with holes bonded to rigid plates.
4. 3D analysis of solid composite plate with holes connected to rigid plates via elastic beam connections
(representing screws).
08/16/22
Analaysis
22
b
Proximal Plate Reactions
P over 2.05”
๐‘ƒ = 180 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“
๐‘Ž = 2.83 ๐‘–๐‘›
๐‘ = 1.415 ๐‘–๐‘›
๐‘…1 = ๐‘ƒ
๐‘…1 = 180 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“
a
๐‘€1 = ๐‘ƒ๐‘
๐‘€1 = 254.7 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“ โˆ™ ๐‘–๐‘›
P over 2.05”
M1
R1 over 0.04”
08/16/22
Analaysis
23
b
Composite Reactions
P over 2.05”
๐‘ƒ = 180 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“
๐‘Ž = 2.83 ๐‘–๐‘›
๐‘ = 1.415 ๐‘–๐‘›
๐‘…1 = 180 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“
๐‘€1 = 254.7 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“ โˆ™ ๐‘–๐‘›
a
๐‘…2 = ๐‘…1
๐‘…2 = 180 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“
R1 over 0.04”
เท ๐‘€๐‘…2 = ๐‘€2 − ๐‘€1 + ๐‘…1 ๐‘Ž = 0
๐‘€2 = −254.7 ๐‘™๐‘๐‘“ โˆ™ ๐‘–๐‘›
M2
M1
R2 over 0.04”
08/16/22
Analaysis
24
Materials
E-Fiberglass/Epoxy, FVR = 67%
Low Alloy Steel
08/16/22
Analaysis
25
Beam Elements
Shear
Beam Width (into slide) = 2”
Beam Height = 0.21”
Moment
Deflection
08/16/22
Analaysis
26
Discussion of Previous Slide
• Beam geometry allows for Euler-Bernoulli deflection.
• Though the material is orthotropic, the x-direction material properties are dominant and results are equivalent
to isotropic bending.
• All diagrams verified by hand calcs.
08/16/22
Analaysis
27
Solid Elements, Bonded Contacts
y-axis direction
Bonded Contact Surfaces
x-axis direction
08/16/22
Analaysis
28
Discussion of Previous Slide
• Deflection is very close to beam results
• Minimum normal stress (maximum compressive bending stress) is a singularity due to contact with sharp
corner of plates.
• Maximum normal stress is ~14% less than beam results. Primarily due to the bonded contact where beam is
supported by distributed load, thus there is a decrease in moment arm and a decrease in moment in the solid.
08/16/22
Analaysis
29
Solid Elements with Holes, Bonded Contacts
y-axis direction
Bonded Contact Surfaces
x-axis direction
08/16/22
Analaysis
30
Discussion of Previous Slide
• Deflection has increased compared to the previous analysis due to the decrease in stiffness at the hole
locations.
• Minimum normal stress (maximum compressive bending stress) is a singularity due to contact with sharp
corner of plates.
• The increase in maximum normal stress is local to the hole locations. The probed value of 16,077 psi away
from the holes is more realistic, though is still lower than beam results due to the bonded contact and decrease
in moment arm.
08/16/22
Analaysis
31
Solid Elements with Holes, Beam Connections
Beam Connections
y-axis direction
No Separation Contact Surfaces
x-axis direction
08/16/22
Analaysis
32
Discussion of Previous Slide
• Deflection has grown compared to the previous analysis due to the elastic beam elements able to bend.
• Minimum normal stress (maximum compressive bending stress) is a singularity due to contact with sharp
corner of plates.
• The increase in maximum normal stress compared to previous analysis is due to the increase in deflection.
08/16/22
Analaysis
33
Download