5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
>
> Web Sites under construction: [www.luisewing.com] or [www.ultimateusers.com]
>
>
> GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at [http://www.americanvision (D0T) com] says:
>
> "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou
shall be no Priest to me:and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6
>
> "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye
receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4
>
> "Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, We ought rather to obey God than men." Acts, 5:29
>
> "Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, and purge your hearts, ye double
minded." James 5:8
>
> "And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve, whether the gods which your
fathers served (that were beyond the flood) or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: butI and mine house will
serve the Lord." Joshua 24:15
>
> "No servant can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other: or else he shall lean to the one, and
despise the other, Ye cannot serve God and riches." Luke 16:13
>
> "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers: for there is no power but of God: and the powers that be, are ordained of
God." Romans 13:1
>
> "Whoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God:and they that resist, shall receive to themselves
condemnation." Romans13:2
>
>
> "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world, why, as though ye lived in the world, are ye
burdened with traditions?" Colossians 2:20
>
> "As, Touch not, Taste not, Handle not." Colossians 2:21
>
> "Which all perish with the using, and are after the commandments and doctrines of men." Colossians 2:22
>
> "And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way,
and fastened it upon the cross, . . ." Colossians 2: 14.
>
> "That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men,
and with crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive." Ephesians, 4:14
>
> "And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully." Timothy, 1:8
>
> "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them." Mathews
5:17.
>
>
>
> SUBJECT: ALL COURTS ARE CONDUCTING A . . . GENERAL COURTS MARTIAL . . .OR . . . A SPECIAL COURTS
MARTIAL . . . OR . . . AN INVESTIGATION . . . AGAINST CIVILIANS WHO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE NOT IN THE
MILITIA!!!!
>
>
> VIP!!!!
>
> PRESS RELEASE!!!
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
1/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
>
> "RCW 1.16.090 Legislative declaration for civil liberties day of remembrance.
> The legislature recognizes that on February 19, 1942, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ISSUED EXECUTIVE
ORDER 9066 WHICH AUTHORIZED MILITARY RULE OVER CIVILIAN LAW AND LIVES . . ."
>
>
> See: SHIMOLA v. LOCAL BOARD NO. 42 FOR CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., 40 Fed. Sup. 808 (1941). This case states .
. . "CIVIL RIGHTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SUBJECT TO MILITARY EXIGENCY." . . . For additional information on this fact,
see West's Key 10, CJS War, sections 10, 11 and 12, as well as the Civil Rights Acts codified under USCA 42, § 1981 and
1982 and the origination of the 14th Amendment.
>
>
> A SOFT KIND OF MARTIAL LAW????
>
>
> <http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/law-enforcement-corruption--abuse/police-brutality-during-occupy-wall-stprotest.html>
>
>
>
> "THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED" . . . EXISTS ONLY IN . . . "A MILITARY COURT ROOM!!!!"
>
>
> PLEASE FORWARD LUIS EWING'S THREE (3) NEW FREE FLYERS FAR AND WIDE, MAKE COPIES AND HAND
THESE OUT IN FRONT OF EVERY COURT HOUSE AND START OBJECTING TO ALL THE JUDGES TO THE MILITARY
NATURE OF THE COURT PROCEEDINGS!!!!
>
>
> Your Honor, I have the Right to know . . . "THE NATURE AND THE CAUSE."
>
>
> Now watch, the judge will start reading off . . . "THE STATUTORY CHARGES" . . . that are already on the traffic citation
that the 80 IQ or less ANDROID COP gave you!
>
>
> Your Honor, I object to your wasting tax payers money and time reading me the charge again, I DID GRADUATE FROM
HIGH SKOOL AND I AM CAPABLE OF READING ENGLISH YOUR HONOR, I already know THE CAUSE your honor, why
are you reading me THE CAUSE over again, that's NOT want I want to know your honor!
>
>
> I WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS, IS THIS A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS
MARTIAL OR IS THIS AN INVESTIGATION UNDER A COURTS MARTIAL PROCEEDING, IS THIS A MILITARY COURT
ROOM????
>
>
> Ha, ha, now we can really start to have some fun with . . . THE THIEVESIN BLACK ROBES OF TREASON!!!!
>
>
> ***
>
>
> Did you know that . . . "THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED" . . . exists onlyin a . . . MILITARY COURT ROOM????
>
> Did you know that according to . . . "ALL STATE CONSTITUTIONS" . . . show that . . . "ALL MALES" . . . between the ages
of 18 and 45 is presumed to be in either . . . "THE REGULATED MILITA" . . . or . . . "THE UNREGULATED MILITIA."
>
> All those in the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and the National Guard are in . . . "THE REGULATED MILITA."
>
> All males between the ages of 18 and 45 are according to all State Constitutions presumed to be in . . . "THE
UNREGULATED MILITIA."
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
2/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
> Did you know that the Voter Registrar is also the Military Enrollment Officer for your "district"????
>
> Did you know that they amended an amendment of an amendment to an amendment to a statute which is only "prima
facie" evidence of the law, but infact is not the law to make the statutes non-gender specific so that they could unlawfully bring
. . . "WOMEN" . . . in to . . . "THE UNREGULATEDMILITIA" . . . illegally and in violation of all current State Constitutions.
>
>
> Go look at Rule 2 in the Civil Rules, specifically go see CR 2 and you will see that they have combined law and equity into
one form of action called civil.
>
>
> "RULE 2
> ONE FORM OF ACTION
> There shall be one form of action to be known as "civil action.""
>
>
> Then search your State statutes and you will see that they have abolished all forms of criminal pleadings just like they have
done in WashingtonState in this statute right here:.
>
>
> "RCW 10.01.030 Pleadings--Forms abolished.
> All the forms of pleading in criminal actions heretofore existing, are abolished; and hereafter, the forms of pleading, and the
rules by which the sufficiency of pleadings is to be determined, are those prescribed herein. [Code 1881 § 1002; 1873 p 224 §
185; 1869 p 240 § 180; RRS §2022.]."
>
>
> They have brought in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction and combined it together with Rule 2 and the martial law
jurisdiction.
>
>
> Did you know that all of . . .THE 1984 COURT REFORM ACTS . . . specifically were derived from an earlier Act passed in
1967 at the same time that . . . THE COAST GUARD . . . was transferred to . . . THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. . . and given the authority to prescribe amendments toall Title 49 regulations under . . . DOT Order No. 1100.1 (49 CFR, part
1)????
>
> Did you know that 49 CFR is part of . . . "THE LAW OF CARRIAGE" . . . which means . . . "COMMERCIAL
TRANSPORTATION."
>
> Now go see . . . THE MANUAL FOR COURTS - MARTIAL . . . by the United States Department of Defense at the third
page clearly shows that . . . THECOAST GUARD . . . is part of . . . THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . . . and
reads :
>
>
>
>
"REGULATIONS SUPPLEMENTING THE MANUAL FOR COURT-MARTIAL
>
>
PREFATORY NOTE: The regulations appearing in the Court Guard Supplement to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United
States, 1951, were prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury until the transfer of the Coast Guard tothe Department of
Transportation on 1 April 1967. Under DOT Order No. 1100.1 (49 CFR, Part 1) the Commandant now possesses the
authority to prescribe amendments to these regulations.
>
>
References herein to "the Code" and "UCMJ" mean The Uniform Code of Military Justice [10 USCA §§ 801 - 940].
>
>
References herein to sections and subsections of this Supplement may be cited as follows:
>
>
"Section 0103b (2) CG Supp. MCM"
>
>
>
> It is now undisputed that the . . . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION" . . .is now under control and supervision by . . .
THE COAST GUARD . . . and . . . THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE [10 USCA §§ 801 - 940] . . . in direct
violation of . . . THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT.
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
3/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> What I am trying to show you here is how our criminally corrupt State Court systems and treasonous Bar Attorneys,
Prosecutors, and Jewish Attorney controlled legislatures are trying to hide from you!!!!
>
> What the Courts are trying to hide from you is . . . THE FACT . . . that all of our court's are using a form of Martial Law&
Military Jurisdiction against you and they use the rules of Admiralty& Maritime Jurisdiction against you which have all been
merged together into form of action called Civil so that you cannot tell which law form they are using againstyou!!!!
>
> What is the nature of this cause or case????
>
> They never tell you the nature of the accusation!!!!
>
> They never tell you that . . . THE NATURE . . . of this cause of actionis under . . . A MARTIAL LAW . . . and/or . . .
MILITARY JURISDICTION . . . using the rules of Admiralty procedure which they have merged withthe rules of law and equity
so that you cannot tell the difference of the nature of the accusation, is it civil, is it criminal, is it law, is itcommon law or
equity????
>
>
>
>
Benedicts on Admiralty, 7th Ed. Jurisdiction, Section 104:
>
>
>
"It is also abundantly established that by the grant of admiralty andmaritime jurisdiction, the national government took
over the traditionalbody of rules, precepts and practices known to lawyers and legislatures as the maritime law, so far as the
courts invested with admiralty jurisdiction should accept and apply to them. . ." and citing "U.S. v. Gill, 4 U.S. 426, 1 L.Ed.
844, `The words of the Constitution must be taken to refer to the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of England (from whose
codes and practice we derive our systems of jurisprudence and generally speaking, obtain the best glossary). . .' per justice
Washington."; section 105 Benedict Supra "As to recognition of State regulation of maritime law,the matter is admiralty stated
in Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354, 79 S.Ct. 468, 3 L.Ed.2d 368 (1959), cf. In the Matter of
Alexander McNeal, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 236, 20 L.Ed. 624."
>
>
>
> Under Admiralty, they have all three parts of the law that they would proceed with in the court's normally which is civil,
criminal and equity, but under Admiralty, its all civil, even the criminal procedure is civil and that is why Rule 2 was developed,
i.e., so you wouldn't know what's going on, but Rule 2 clearly tells you that there is only 1 form of actioncalled civil.
>
>
> The Judiciary Act of 1792 makes it clear that Congress said that . . . "the forms and modes of proceeding in causes of
equity and of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction shall be according to the course of civil law" .. . and reads:
>
>
> "SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States,
cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their
respective districts, or upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not
exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted; and shall also have
exclusiveoriginal cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of
impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by
vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within theirrespective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all
cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive
original cognizance of all seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of allsuits for penalties and
forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the
several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law
of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at
common law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts, exclusive of costs, to the sumor value of one
hundred dollars. And shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several States, of all suits against consuls or
vice-consuls, except for offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in fact, in the district courts, in all
causes exceptcivil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, shall be by jury."
>
>
> 27 CRF 72.11 defines all crimes as being "commercial crimes and reads:
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
4/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
> Sec. 72.11 Meaning of terms.
> As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires, terms shall have the meanings ascribed in this section. Words
in the plural form shall include the singular, and vice versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the
feminine. The terms "includes" and "including" do not exclude things not enumerated which are in the same general class.
> ...
>
> Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary;
counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including
soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and
confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring tocommit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction
to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercialcrime."
>
>
> Furthermore all revenue is collected under maritime principles; see TheHuntress, 92 Ware (Dav. 82) 89; 4 West Law J.38;
12 Fed. Case 984, 922:
>
> "In this country, revenue causes had so long been the subject of Admiralty cognizance, that Congress considered them as
civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and to preclude any doubt that might arise, carefully added the clause,
"including," etc.. This is clear proof that congress considered these words to be used in the sense they bore in thiscountry
and not in that which they had in England. The Act gives exclusive admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the district court as
a courtof the law of nations." The Huntress, 92 Ware (Dav. 82) 89; 4 West Law J.38; 12 Fed. Case 984, 922
>
>
> THE COAST GUARD IS THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION!!!!
>
>
> THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IS THE COAST GUARD!!!!
>
>
> THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAS BEEN MERGED WITH THE COAST GUARD!!!!
>
>
> Did you know that . . . "INSURANCE" . . . is only required of those whoare involved in . . . COMMERCIAL
TRANSPORTATION????
>
>
> Did you know that . . . A POLICY OF INSURANCE IS A MARITIME CONTRACT????
>
>
>
"A policy of insurance is a maritime contract, and therefore of admiralty jurisdiction." De Lovio v. Boit, 7 Fed. Cas. No.
#, 776 (1815).
>
>
> Benedict on Admiralty, 1850 says:
>
>
>
"Its necessary effect [the Act] was, however, to start the courts on the system of practice, and really to impose upon
them, in admiralty and maritime cases, the civil law practice, as that under which they must continue to administer justice,
even after the expiration of the act, until further provision could be made." Benedict on Admiralty, 1850.
>
>
>
"To the extent that admiralty procedure differs from the civil procedure, it is a mystery to most trial and appellate
judges, and to the non-specialist lawyer who finds himself-sometimes to his surprise– in a casecognizable only on the
admiralty `side' of the court. `Admiralty practice', said Mr. Jackson, `is a unique system of substantive laws and procedures
with which members of this court are singularly deficient in experience." Unification act of 1964 (34 PRD 325, quoting, Black
Diamond S.S. Corp. v. Stewart& Sons, 336 U.S. 386, 69 S.Ct. 622, 93 L.Ed. 754 (1949).
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
5/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> WASHINGTON LAW:
>
>
> RCW 10.37.015 Charge by information or indictment — Exceptions.
>
>
>
*** CHANGE IN 2011 *** (SEE 5195-S.SL) ***
>
> No person shall be held to answer in any court for an alleged crime or offense, unless upon an information filed by the
prosecuting attorney, orupon an indictment by a grand jury, except in cases of misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor before a
district or municipal judge, OR BEFORE A COURT MARTIAL.
>
> [1987 c 202 § 167; 1927 c 103 § 1; Code 1881 § 764; RRS § 2023.Formerly RCW 10.37.010, part.]
>
> Notes:
>
Intent -- 1987 c 202: See note following RCW 2.04.190.
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
>
> The Sixth Amendment only gives . . . "THE RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL."
>
> The Sixth Amendment does NOT use the word . . . "REPRESENT" . . . or . . . "REPRESENTED."
>
> Go look at your State Constitution, it will probably say that you have . . . "THE RIGHT TO DEFEND IN PERSON" . . . and/or
. . . have . . . "THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL."
>
>
> ***
>
> But do notice, you will see with your own eyes, your State Constitutiondoes NOT use the word . . . "REPRESENT" . . . or . .
. "REPRESENTED" . .. anywhere in your State Constitution!!!!
>
>
> ***
>
>
> Now, go to . . . "GOOGLE" . . . and type in . . . REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON . . . and go look for . . . TITLE 38 . . . in
the Revised Code of Washington.
>
> RCW 38 is entitled . . . "RCW 38 MILITIA& MILITARY AFFAIRS."
>
> Now go look for . . . "RCW 38.38.376 (1)(2) and you will see with your own eyes:
>
>
> THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED . . . EXISTS ONLY IN A MILITARY COURT!!!!
>
>
> RCW 38.38.376 [Art. 38] Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.
>
> (1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the name of the state, and shall, under the
direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.
>
> (2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his or her defense before a general or special courtmartial or at an investigation under RCW38.38.316 as provided in this subsection.
>
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
6/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
> IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXISTS ONLY IN A GENERAL OR SPECIAL
COURTS MARTIAL OR AT AN INVESTIGATION IN A MILITARY COURT ROOM!!!!
>
>
> Now, go back to . . . "GOOGLE" . . . and type in . . . "UNITED STATES CODE."
>
>
> Then when you get to the United States Code, type in 10 in the Title box and then type in 838 in the section box and you
will see the following:
>
>
>
> "TITLE 10> Subtitle A> PART II> CHAPTER 47> SUBCHAPTER VII> § 838
>
> § 838. Art. 38. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel
>
> (a)The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the name of the United States, and shall, under
the direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.
> (b)
> (1)THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his defense before a general or special court-martial or at
an investigation under section 832of this title (article 32) as provided in this subsection."
>
>
> IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXISTS ONLY IN A GENERAL OR SPECIAL
COURTS MARTIAL OR AT AN INVESTIGATION IN A MILITARY COURT ROOM!!!
>
>
> Wanna set up the . . . JUDGES????
>
> Everyone needs to start asking all the judges the following questions:
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, CAN THIS COURT COMPEL ME TO WAIVE ONE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IN ORDER TO EXERT
ANOTHER?
>
>
> The Judge will say NO in most circumstances, unless you have a tricky or corrupt judge in which case he will start to go
into a long dissertation about what Constitutional Rights you have or don't have and your response should be:
>
>
> 1.) I OBJECT YOUR HONOR, Simmons et al. v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968), . . .
at page 394, says that Icannot be compelled to waive one Constitutional Right in order to exert another and reads:
>
>
>
"In these circumstances, we find it intolerable that onc constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to
assert another." Simmons et al. v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, at 394, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968)
>
>
>
> 2.) YOUR HONOR, IT'S A YES OR NO QUESTION, DOES THIS COURT HAVE THE LEGAL OR LAWFUL AUTHORITY
TO REQUIRE ME TO WAIVE ONE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT BEFORE I CAN EXERT ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT????
>
>
> If the Judge is honest, he should say . . . "NO."
>
>
> Now we have the Judge right where we want him!
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, DO I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED?
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
7/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> All the judges will say . . . "YES YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTEDBY ANY ATTORNEY YOU CHOOSE."
>
> I OBJECT YOUR HONOR, WHICH STATE OR FEDERAL STATUTE SAYS THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED????
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SIXTH AMENDMENT SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ANY SO CALLED RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED!
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SIXTH AMENDMENT ONLY SAYS THAT I HAVE . . . "THE RIGHT TO THE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL."
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE STATE CONSTITUTION ONLY SAYS THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF
IN PERSON OR BY ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SO CALLED . . . "RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED HAS NO FOUNDATION IN LAW FOR
CIVILIANS."
>
> In anticipation that the judge will tell you that you are in a State court and NOT a federal court and will tell you that 10
U.S.C. 838 only applies to federal courts and has no bearing in this so called State Court, ask him the following question:
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, DOES . . . "THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED COME FROM RCW 38.38.376????
>
>
> [Note: Find and Replace RCW 38.38.376 with your state statute and make the exact same argument.]
>
>
> If the judge tells you he doesn't know because he does not have the statute right in front of him, then read him the
following:
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, RCW 38.38.376 says:
>
>
> RCW 38.38.376 [Art. 38] Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.
>
> (1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the name of the state, and shall, under the
direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.
>
> (2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his or her defense before a general or special courtmartial or at an investigation under RCW38.38.316 as provided in this subsection.
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT TO THIS MILITARY NATURE OF THIS PROCEEDING!
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, IS THIS A MILITARY COURT ROOM????
>
>
> YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, BOTH THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND THE STATE CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT I HAVE
THE RIGHT TO KNOW . . . "THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THISPROCEEDING" . . . SO I AM ASKING YOU WHAT IS THE
NATURE OF THIS PROCEEDING, IS THIS A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL????
>
>
> I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR HONOR, YOU PREVIOUSLY STATED ON THE COURT RECORD THAT THIS IS NOT A
MILITARY COURT ROOM DIDN'T YOU????
>
>
> I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR HONOR, YOU PREVIOUSLY STATED ON THE COURT RECORD THAT . . . "I HAVE THE
RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED, CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHICH SECTION OF THE STATE CODES OR STATUTES
SAYS THAT . . . I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED"????
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
8/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
>
> ***
>
>
> ARE YOU IN THE MILITIA????
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
> OREGON LAW:
>
> "396.105 Militia comprised of organized and unorganized militia. (1) The militia of the state shall be divided into the
organized militia and the unorganized militia.
> (2) The organized militia shall be composed of the Oregon Army NationalGuard and the Oregon Air National Guard, which
forces together with an inactive National Guard shall comprise the Oregon National Guard; the Oregon State Defense Force
whenever such a state force shall be duly organized; and such additional forces as may be created by the Governor.
> (3) THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA SHALL CONSIST OF ALL ABLE-BODIED RESIDENTS OF THE STATE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 18 AND 45 WHO ARE NOT SERVING IN ANY FORCE OF THE ORGANIZED MILITIA or who are not on the
state retired list and who are or who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States; subject, however,
to such exemptions from military duty as are created by the laws of the United States. [1961 c.454 §5(1),(2),(3);1989 c.361
§2; 2005 c.512 §3]
> 396.110 [Repealed by 1961 c.454 §213]"
>
>
> 398.206 Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel. (1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall
prosecute in the name of the state and shall, under the direction of the court, prepare the recordof the proceedings.
> (2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in the accused's defense before a general or special courtmartial by civilian counsel if provided by the accused, or by military counsel of the accused's own selection if reasonably
available, or by the defense counsel detailed under ORS 398.136. Should the accused have counsel of the accused's own
selection, the defense counsel and assistant defense counsel, if any, who were detailed, shall, if the accused so desires, act
as associate counsel; otherwisethey shall be excused by the military judge or by the president of a court-martial without a
military judge.
>
>
> ***
>
> CALIFORNIA MILITARY AND VETERANS CODE SECTION 120 TO 130:
>
>
> "120. The militia of the State shall consist of the National Guard, State Military Reserve and the Naval Militia--which
constitute the active militia--and the unorganized militia.
>
> 121. THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA CONSISTS OF ALL PERSONS LIABLE TO SERVICEIN THE MILITIA, but not
members of the National Guard, the State Military Reserve, or the Naval Militia.
>
>
> 122. THE MILITIA OF THE STATE CONSISTS OF ALL ABLE-BODIED MALE CITIZENSAND ALL OTHER ABLE-BODIED
MALES WHO HAVE DECLARED THEIR INTENTION TO BECOME CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, WHO ARE
BETWEEN THE AGES OF EIGHTEEN AND FORTY-FIVE, and who are residents of the State, and of such other persons as
may upon their own application be enlisted or commissioned thereinpursuant to the provisions of this division, subject,
however, to such exemptions as now exist or may be hereafter created by the laws of the United States or of this State."
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
> TEXAS LAW:
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
9/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> GOVERNMENT CODE
> TITLE 4. EXECUTIVE BRANCH
> SUBTITLE C. STATE MILITARY FORCES AND VETERANS
> CHAPTER 432. TEXAS CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
>
> SUBCHAPTER F. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE
>
> Sec. 432.053. INVESTIGATION. (a) A charge or specification may not be referred to A GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL for
trial until a thorough and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth has been made. This investigation must include
inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and a recommendationas to
the disposition that should be made of the case in the interest ofjustice and discipline.
> (b) THE ACCUSED IS ENTITLED TO BE ADVISED OF THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM AND OF HIS RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED AT THAT INVESTIGATION BY COUNSEL. ON THE ACCUSED'S OWN REQUEST, HE IS ENTITLED TO
BE REPRESENTED BY CIVILIAN COUNSEL IF PROVIDED BY HIM, or by military counsel of his own selection if that
counsel is reasonably available, OR BY COUNSEL DETAILED BY THE OFFICER EXERCISING GENERAL COURTMARTIAL JURISDICTION OVER THE COMMAND.
>
> ***
> KANSAS LAW
>
> 48-2505: (KCMJ Art. 27) Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel. (a) (1) Trial counsel and defense counsel shall be
detailed for each general and special court-martial. Assistant trial counsel and assistant and associate defense counsel may
be detailed for each general and special court-martial. The governor shall prescribe regulations providing for the manner in
which counsel are detailed for such courts-martial and for the persons who are authorized to detail counsel for such courtsmartial.
>
>
(2) No person who has acted as investigating officer, militaryjudge or court member in any case may act later as trial
counsel, assistant trial counsel or, unless expressly requested by the accused, as defense counsel or assistant or associate
defense counsel in the same case. Noperson who has acted for the prosecution may act later in the same case for the
defense, nor may any person who has acted for the defense act later in the same case for the prosecution.
>
>
(b) Trial counsel or defense counsel detailed for a general court-martial:
>
>
(1) Must be a judge advocate who is a graduate of an accredited law school or is a member of the bar of the highest
court of a state; and
>
>
(2) must be certified as competent to perform such duties by the judge advocate general of the state military forces.
>
>
(c) In the case of a special court-martial:
>
>
(1) THE ACCUSED SHALL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE REPRESENTED AT THE TRIAL BY
COUNSEL HAVING THE QUALIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED UNDER SUBSECTION (b) unless counsel having such
qualifications cannot be obtained on account of physical conditions or military exigencies. If counsel having such qualifications
cannot be obtained, the court may be convened and the trial held, but the convening authority shall make a detailed written
statement, to be appended to the record, stating why counsel with such qualifications could not be obtained;
>
>
(2) if the trial counsel is qualified to act as counsel beforea general court-martial, the defense counsel detailed by the
convening authority must be a person similarly qualified; and
>
>
(3) if the trial counsel is a judge advocate or a member of the bar of the highest court of the state, the defense counsel
detailed by the convening authority must be one of the foregoing.
>
>
History: L. 1972, ch. 203, § 48-2505; L. 1988, ch. 191, § 20; July 1.
>
> ***
>
> NOTE: I HAVE THREE (3) NEW FLYERS THAT HELP YOU MAKE THESE ARGUMENTS INCOURT!!!! – Please send me
an e-mail to the addresses listed above and below and request that I send you the three (3) new flyers that help teach you to
argue that you have a right to "manage and plead your own cause personally" or have "the assistance of counsel" and NOT
waive your rights to counsel when you refuse to take or accept one of their piece of shit traitor bar attorneys!
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
10/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
> ***
>
> WHEN YOU FIND THE SIMILAR . . . "MILITIA& MILITARYAFFAIRS STATUTES" . . . regarding the alleged . . . "RIGHT TO
REPRESENTATION" . . . in yourSTATE, please send it to me so that I can add it to my list above and then I will send it back to
all those who are in your STATE who are on my FIFTY STATES E-MAIL LIST!!!!
>
> ***
>
> MY NEW JUDICIARY ACT FLYER CLEARLY SHOWS THAT YOU CAN APPEAR IN COURT BY ONE (1) OF THREE (3)
DIFFERENT WAYS which does NOT include any alleged . . . "RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED."
>
> Also please notice in my . . . NEW JUDICIARY ACT FLYER . . . that you will NOT find any wording that says . . . THAT
YOU HAVE TO WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL IN ORDER TO . . . "MANAGE AND PLEAD YOUR OWN CAUSES
PERSONALLY" . . . OR . . . TO DEFEND YOURSELF!!!!
>
> ***
> Please also see my . . . NEW RIGHT TO COUNSEL FLYER . . . which also clearly shows you that the alleged . . . "RIGHT
TO BE REPRESENTED" . . . has . . . "NO FOUNDATION IN LAW" . . . it's NOT in the Sixth Amendment or in your State
Constitution!!!!
>
> Please notice that my . . . NEW RIGHT TO COUNSEL FLYER . . . also showsyou that neither the Sixth Amendment or your
State Constitution includesany wording that says . . . THAT YOU HAVE TO WAIVE YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL IN ORDER
TO DEFEND YOURSELF!!!!
>
>
> ***
>
> NO YOUR HONOR, I REFUSE TO BE . . . "REPRESENTED."
>
> YOUR HONOR, CAN I SPECIFICALLY HIRE AN ATTORNEY . . . UNDER A CONTRACT . . . TO ONLY PROVIDE ME . . .
"ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" . . . TO BE . .. "MY MOUTH PIECE" . . . AND SPEAK FOR ME AS . . . MY NEXT FRIEND . . .
TO BE . . . MY MIRACLE ON 34TH STREET . . . AND . . . "NOT TO REPRESENT ME"????
>
>
> NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NOT GOING TO HIRE ANY TRAITOR OR TREASONOUS
> BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT ME AND I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL EITHER!!!!
>
> NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NOT GOING TO ACCEPT ANY TRAITOR OR TREASONOUS PUBLIC DEFENDER TO
REPRESENT ME AND I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL EITHER!!!!
>
> NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NEVER GOING TO WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, LET THE RECORD SO REFLECT!!!!
>
> ***
>
> Everyone needs to study the attached FREE FLYERS and read over the above arguments over and over again and start
making these type of oral arguments in court and object, object, object!
>
> ***
>
> Did you know that when you hire any attorney to . . . "REPRESENT YOU" .. . that you have . . . "WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS
TO COUNSEL"????
>
> Did you know that when you accept any Public Defender who is an attorney to . . . "REPRESENT YOU" . . . that you have .
. . "WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL"????
>
>
> DID YOU KNOW THAT THE TRUTH IS THAT THE PERSON WHO IS REPRESENTED BY ANATTORNEY HAS A FOOL
FOR A CLIENT . . . AND A FOOL FOR AN ATTORNEY!!!!
>
>
> If you want to go to prison, accept the public defender!
>
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
11/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> Did you know that when you accept or allow a public defender who is an attorney who is a member of the very same State
Bar Association as all the U.S. Attorney's and all the Judges, that you have . . . "WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS TO
COUNSEL"????
>
>
> DID YOU KNOW THAT THE TRUTH IS THAT THE PERSON WHO IS REPRESENTED BY ANATTORNEY HAS A FOOL
FOR A CLIENT . . . AND A FOOL FOR AN ATTORNEY!!!!
>
>
> EVERYBODY WHO ALLOWS AN ATTORNEY TO . . . "REPRESENT THEM" . . . VOLUNTEERS TO GO TO PRISON
UNDER ARGERSENGER v. HAMLIN which reads:
>
>
>
""We hold that no person may be deprived of his liberty who has been denied the assistance of counsel as guaranteed
by the Sixth Amendment. This holding is applicable to all criminal prosecutions, including prosecutions for violations of
municipal ordinances. The denial of assistance of counsel will preclude the imposition of a jail sentence. . . . Under the rule
we announce today, every judge will know when the trial of a misdemeanor starts that no imprisonment may be imposed,
even though local lawpermits it, UNLESS THE ACCUSED IS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. He will have a measure of the
seriousness and gravity of the offense and therefore know when to name a lawyer to represent the accused before the trial
starts." ARGERSINGER v. HAMLIN, 407 U.S. 25 (June 12, 1972). And;
>
>
>
> Now go read Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 45 L. Ed. 2d 562 (1975) and then read . . . "THE
DISSENTING OPINION" . . .in Farreta, supra, and then go back and read Argersenger v. Hamlin, supra, and then tell me if
you can see or figure out where . . . "THEY SWITCHED OUT THE WORDS" . . . "REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL" . . . in
place of . . . "ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" . . . in . . . "A DICTA LIKE MANNER" . . . and then tell me where in the Sixth
Amendment does it say that any of us has an alleged . . . "RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED."
>
>
> YES, I HAVE EXPOSED THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN LEGAL HISTORY!!!!
>
>
> IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY WHO HIRES AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THEM
HAS A FOOL FOR A CLIENT . . . AND A FOOL FOR AN ATTORNEY!!!!
>
>
> If you want to go to prison try to do it yourself!
>
>
> If you want to go back to prison for probation violations, try to do ityourself!
>
>
> If you don't want to go to prison, HIRE ME . . . to provide you . . ."THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" . . . as
envisioned by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, your State Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 was
passed on September 24, 1789 and is an Act of Congres
>
> See 1 Stat 73 at section 35 which reads:
>
>
>
"SEC. 35. And be it further enacted, That in all courts of the United States, the parties may plead and manage their own
causes personally or by assistance of such counsel or attorneys at law as by the rules of the said courts respectively shall be
permitted to manage and conduct causes therein. And there shall be appointed in each district a meet person learned in the
law to act as attorney for the United States in such district,who shall be sworn or affirmed to the faithful execution of his office,
whose duty it shall be to prosecute in such district all delinquents for crimes and offences, cognizable under the authority of
the United States,and all civil actions in which the United States shall be concerned, except before the supreme court in the
district in which that court shall beholden. And he shall receive as compensation for his services such fees as shall be taxed
therefor in the respective courts before which the suits or prosecutions shall be. And there shall also be appointed a meet
person, learned in the law, to act as attorney-general for the United States,who shall be sworn or affirmed to a faithful
execution of his office; whose duty it shall be to prosecute and conduct all suits in the Supreme Court in which the United
States shall be concerned, and to give his adviceand opinion upon questions of law when required by the President of the
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
12/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
United States, or when requested by the heads of any of the departments, touching any matters that may concern their
departments, and shall receive such compensation for his services as shall by law be provided.." The Judiciary Act of 1789,
September 24, 1789, 1 Stat 73, CHAP. XX, Sec. 35.
>
>
> Section 35 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provides no less than . . . "three different' . . . ways by which a defendant may
appear in court which is clearly worded in . . . the disjunctive . . . "OR' . . . and clearly states that . . . "the parties may plead
and manage their own causes personally" . . . OR . . . "by assistance of such counsel" . . . OR . . . "attorneys at law" . . . as
by the rules of the said courts respectively shall be permitted to manage and conduct causes therein.
>
>
>
Section 35 of the Judiciary Act was codified at 28 U.S.C. 1654 which provides that:
>
>
>
"TITLE 28> PART V> CHAPTER 111> § 1654
>
§ 1654. Appearance personally or by counsel
>
In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel as, by the
rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and conduct causes therein."
>
>
> 28 U.S.C. 1654 Appearance personally or by counsel like section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1792 is also worded in the
disjunctive "or" and it clearly states that . . . "In all courts of the United States . . . "the parties may plead and conduct their
own cases personally" . . . OR . . . "by counsel" . . . as, by the rules of such courts, respectively, are permitted to manage and
conduct causes therein."
>
>
> I OBJECT YOUR HONOR, THE ACTS OF CONGRESS AND THE UNITED STATES CODE CLEARLY STATES THAT I
CAN . . . "PLEAD AND MANAGE MY OWN CASES PERSONALLY" . . . AND DOES NOT STATE THAT I HAVE TO
REPRESENT MYSELF OR THAT I HAVETO WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL IN ORDER TO DO MY OWN CASE!!!!
>
>
> I AM NOT REPRESENTING MY SELF AND I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL!
>
>
> I hope this is helpful to all those who don't want to be the fool for aclient who hires an attorney to represent him!
>
>
> I am putting together a complete motions to dismiss package based upon the fact that these courts have no legal authority
to force counsel on you over your objection and I am putting together the complete documentation package that will set the
court record to show that you NEVER WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, THEREFORE THEY CANNOT SEND YOU
TO PRISON EVEN WHEN FOUND GUILTY OF ANY CRIME UNDER . . . ARGERSENGER v. HAMLIN, 407 U.S. 25, 27, 31,
37, 38, 40 (June 12, 1972).
>
>
> FORMER U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGE BORK SAID:
>
> "EVERYONE VOLUNTEERS TO GO TO PRISON."
>
>
> I HAVE FIGURED OUT THE FLAWS IN THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, THE FARETTA CASE AND ARGERSENGER v.
HAMLIN.
>
> 1.) Farettta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
> 2.) Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 27, 31, 37, 38, 40 (June 12, 1972).
>
>
"We hold that no person may be deprived of his liberty who has been denied the assistance of counsel as guaranteed
by the Sixth Amendment. This holding is applicable to all criminal prosecutions, including prosecutions for violations of
municipal ordinances. The denial of assistance ofcounsel will preclude the imposition of a jail sentence.
>
. . . Under the rule we announce today, every judge will know when the trial of a misdemeanor starts that no
imprisonment may be imposed, eventhough local law permits it, unless the accused is represented by counsel. He will have
a measure of the seriousness and gravity of the offense and therefore know when to name a lawyer to represent the accused
before the trial starts." ARGERSINGER v. HAMLIN, 407 U.S. 25, 27, 31, 37, 38, 40 (June 12, 1972). And;
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
13/14
5/12/22, 7:38 AM
iamsomedude@yahoo.com - Yahoo Mail
>
> I CAN KEEP YOU OUT OF PRISON EVEN IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL!
>
> 1.) ABOUT 5 TO 6 YEARS AGO, I TOOK TWO IRS TAX DEFENDANTS . . . "PATRICK GRANT DAVIS& MARTIN LOUIS
BAUCOM" . . . ALL THE WAY TO TRIAL . . . "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN DOCKET NO. 5:02-cr-26" . . . FOR A MAJOR INCOME TAX CASE,
AND I LET THEM BE FOUND GUILTY ON PURPOSE, THEY WERE FOUNDGUILTY ON ALL COUNTS OF WILLFUL
FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS, INCOME TAX EVASION AND A KLEIN CONSPIRACY BECAUSE THEY
WERE BUSINESS PARTNERSAT TRIAL, BUT THEY DID NOT GO TO PRISON BECAUSE MY PAPERWORK SET THE
RECORD TO SHOW THAT THEY NEVER WAIVED THEIR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, WHERE HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF
ANY BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEY LETTING YOU BE FOUND GUILTY ON PURPOSE AND STILL KEEPING YOU
OUT OF JAIL AT THE SAME TIME????
>
> 2.) JUST 2 YEARS AGO, I TOOK . . . "ONE CALIFORNIA DRUG DEALER RUSSELLGUILLEMOT" . . . ALL THE WAY TO
TRIAL . . . "IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COURT CAUSE NO. SCN221106" . . .
AND I LETHIM BE FOUND GUILTY ON PURPOSE, BUT HE DID NOT GO TO PRISON IN SPITE OFTHE FACT THAT HE
WAS FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL AFTER TURNING DOWN THE PLEA BARGAIN!!!! – WHERE HAVE YOU EVER HEARD
OF ANY ATTORNEY LETTING YOU BE FOUND GUILTY OF MULTIPLE FELONY COUNTS OF MANUFACTURING MORE
THAN 30 PLUSMARIJUANA PLANTS WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE AND STILL BE ABLE TO KEEP YOUOUT OF JAIL
IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT YOU WERE FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL AFTER TURNING DOWN THE PLEA BARGAIN????
>
>
> 3.) IN TWO OF MY OWN RECENT CASES HERE IN WASHINGTON STATE . . . "IN THE PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT
COURT CAUSE NO. XYC004075" . . . WHERE I WAS CHARGED WITH 1 COUNT OF HARASSMENT AND 1 VIOLATION
OF A NO CONTACT ORDER AND I WAS LOOKING AT DOING TWO YEARS JAIL TIME AND EVEN THOUGH I HAD TO
SIT IN JAIL WAITING FOR TRIAL BECAUSE I COULD NOT AFFORD THE EXPENSIVE BAILEXTORTION FEES, I GOT
BOTH CHARGES DISMISSED AND THE CASE NEVER WENT TOTRIAL BECAUSE I NEVER ACCEPTED THE PUBLIC
DEFENDER AND I SET THE COURT RECORD TO SHOW THAT I DID NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL!!!!
>
> FOUR (4) POSITIVE RESULTS IN THREE (3) DIFFERENT CASES:
>
> THREE (3) DIFFERENT CASES IN THREE (3) DIFFERENT STATES WHERE FOUR (4) DIFFERENT PEOPLE
INCLUDING MYSELF DID NOT GO TO JAIL IN SPITE OF THE FACTTHAT ALL THREE (3) OTHER THAN ME WERE
FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL, OH, AND I ALMOST FORGOT TO MENTION, MY CASE NEVER WENT TO TRIAL, I WAS
NEVER FOUNDGUILTY, THEY JUST HELD ME UNTIL MY SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED ANDTHEN THEY
HAD TO KICK ME OUT OF THEIR JAIL ONTO THE STREETS A FREE MAN AGAIN BECAUSE THEY COULD NO
LONGER TAKE ME TO TRIAL BECAUSE MY SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS HAD ALREADY EXPIRED AND I NEVER WAIVED
MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL AND NOW I HAVE GROUNDS FOR ONE HELL OF A LAWSUIT AGAINST PIERCE COUNTY
FOR NEGLIGENT INVESTIGATION, FALSE ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MY EX GIRLFRIEND FOR
BARRATRY, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, PERJURY, LIBEL AND SLANDER, etc.
>
> I am working on a complete . . . "KEEP YOU OUT OF JAIL MOTIONS PACKAGE". . . that will keep you out of jail even
though you are found guilty attrial package which I will release at some Seminars later this year probably starting in
September or maybe in 2012 sometime, I have NOT decided yet?
>
> RECOMMENDED READING:
>
> 1.) U.S. MILITARY JUSTICE HANDBOOK, Uniform Code of Military Justice Title 10, U.S.C. Chapter 47.
>
> 2.) Manual for court - martial, United States Dept. of Defense, Reprints from the collection of the University of Michigan
Library.
>
> 3.) Manual for Courts - Martial, Arthur Murray, United States Army. Office of the Judge Advocate General
>
> 4.) Benedict on Admiralty.
>
> 5.) Blackstones (1897) - Commentaries
>
>
> I hope everyone finds this information useful!
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/2/messages/ACiXLD5jjjELYnwk2QIi4KADbcE
14/14