WIAT®-4
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test® (4th ed.)
Score Report
Name:
Laura Lee Hall
Test date:
03/24/2022
Examinee ID:
LauHal
Report date:
07/17/2022
Birth date:
12/17/2014
Age at testing:
7:3
Gender:
Female
Grade:
1
Race/ethnicity:
White
Semester:
Spring (March-July)
Handedness:
Right
Is this a retest?
No
Home language:
English
Examiner name:
Kelly, Loran
Reason for Referral: To gather information about ability level to assist with educational planning.
Copyright© 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
Warning: This report contains copyrighted material and trade secrets. The qualified licensee may excerpt portions of this output report, limited
to the minimum text necessary to accurately describe their significant core conclusions, for incorporation into a written evaluation of the
examinee, in accordance with their profession's citation standards, if any. No adaptations, translations, modifications, or special versions may
be made of this report without prior written permission from Pearson.
Pearson, Intelligent Essay Assessor, KABC, the W logo, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for
Children, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, WIAT, WISC-V, and WPPSI-IV are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or other
countries, of Pearson PLC or its affiliates.
[ 1.19 / RE1 / QG1 ]
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 2
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Core Composite Score Summary
Composite/Subtest
Raw score 1
Standard
score
95% Confidence
interval
Percentile
rank
Descriptive
category
Age
equivalent
Grade
equivalent
GSV
Total Achievement
511
78
73 - 83
7
Very low
-
-
-
Word Reading
37
78
74 - 82
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
420
Reading Comprehension
122
78
67 - 89
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
451
Spelling
8
87
80 - 94
19
Low average
6:6
K.7
440
Alphabet Writing Fluency
19
102
84 - 120
55
Average
7:2
1.8
487
Math Problem Solving
28
87
79 - 95
19
Low average
6:2
K.7
458
Numerical Operations
10
79
73 - 85
8
Very low
5:10
K.3
431
Reading
156
77
70 - 84
6
Very low
-
-
-
Word Reading
37
78
74 - 82
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
420
Reading Comprehension
122
78
67 - 89
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
451
Written Expression
189
92
80 - 104
30
Average
-
-
-
8
87
80 - 94
19
Low average
6:6
K.7
440
Alphabet Writing Fluency
19
102
84 - 120
55
Average
7:2
1.8
487
Mathematics
166
81
75 - 87
10
Low average
-
-
-
Math Problem Solving
28
87
79 - 95
19
Low average
6:2
K.7
458
Numerical Operations
10
79
73 - 85
8
Very low
5:10
K.3
431
Spelling
1
For composites, Raw score refers to Sum of Subtest Standard Scores.
2
Indicates a raw score that is converted to a weighted raw score (not shown).
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 3
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Supplemental Composite Score Summary
Composite/Subtest
Basic Reading
Raw score 1
Standard
score
95% Confidence
interval
Percentile
rank
Descriptive
category
Age
equivalent
Grade
equivalent
GSV
256
83
79 - 87
13
Low average
-
-
-
Pseudoword Decoding
3
83
78 - 88
13
Low average
<6:2
<1.0
464
Phonemic Proficiency
31
95
88 - 102
37
Average
6:6
1.1
489
Word Reading
37
78
74 - 82
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
420
Decoding
161
79
75 - 83
8
Very low
-
-
-
Pseudoword Decoding
3
83
78 - 88
13
Low average
<6:2
<1.0
464
Word Reading
37
78
74 - 82
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
420
Reading Fluency
171
83
76 - 90
13
Low average
-
-
-
Oral Reading Fluency
2
59
88
80 - 96
21
Low average
6:6
1.0
456
Orthographic Fluency
102
83
72 - 94
13
Low average
<6:2
<1.0
463
Writing Fluency
223
113
99 - 127
81
High average
-
-
-
Alphabet Writing Fluency
19
102
84 - 120
55
Average
7:2
1.8
487
Sentence Writing Fluency
78
121
105 - 137
92
Very high
11:10
6.2
522
Phonological Processing
178
87
81 - 93
19
Low average
-
-
-
Pseudoword Decoding
3
83
78 - 88
13
Low average
<6:2
<1.0
464
Phonemic Proficiency
31
95
88 - 102
37
Average
6:6
1.1
489
Orthographic Processing
170
83
77 - 89
13
Low average
-
-
-
Orthographic Fluency
102
83
72 - 94
13
Low average
<6:2
<1.0
463
8
87
80 - 94
19
Low average
6:6
K.7
440
Dyslexia Index
173
85
81 - 89
16
Low average
-
-
-
Word Reading
37
78
74 - 82
7
Very low
5:10
K.5
420
Phonemic Proficiency
31
95
88 - 102
37
Average
6:6
1.1
489
Spelling
1
For composites, Raw score refers to Sum of Subtest Standard Scores.
2
Indicates a raw score that is converted to a weighted raw score (not shown).
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 4
Core Composite Score Summary Profile
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 5
Supplemental Composite Score Summary Profile
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 6
Supplemental Composite Score Summary Profile (Continued)
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 7
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Base Rates
Oral Reading Accuracy
The number of errors made by the examinee on the Oral Reading Fluency passages
was unusually high compared to individuals in the normative sample who took the
same item set: <=5% of the sample had the same number of errors or more, and at
least 95% of the sample made fewer errors.
Oral Reading Rate
The examinee's reading rate on the Oral Reading Fluency passages was not unusual
compared to individuals in the normative sample who took the same item set: >25%
of the sample had the same or slower reading rate, and 75% or less of the sample
had a faster reading rate.
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 8
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Total Achievement Composite Standard Score Differences
Difference
Critical value
(0.05)
Significant
difference
Base rate
1
6.22
No
>25%
Written Expression
-14
8.16
Yes
<=5%
Total Achievement
Mathematics
-3
6.37
No
>25%
Total Achievement
Basic Reading
-5
5.28
No
<=25%
Total Achievement
Decoding
-1
5.20
No
>25%
Total Achievement
Reading Fluency
-5
9.63
No
<=25%
Total Achievement
Writing Fluency
-35
12.22
Yes
<=2%
Total Achievement
Phonological Processing
-9
7.64
Yes
<=15%
Total Achievement
Composite
Total Achievement
Reading
Total Achievement
Total Achievement
Orthographic Processing
-5
7.86
No
<=25%
Notes. A negative difference indicates that the composite in the comparison has a higher score than the Total
Achievement composite.
A significant difference between a composite score and the Total Achievement composite means the composite is
either a personal strength (if the difference is negative) or a personal weakness (if the difference is positive).
Base rates are not reported when the difference between scores is zero.
Composite Standard Score Differences
Difference
Critical value
(0.05)
Significant
difference
Base rate
Written Expression
-15
12.24
Yes
<=10%
Reading
Mathematics
-4
8.48
No
>25%
Reading
Reading Fluency
-6
8.98
No
<=15%
Reading
Phonological Processing
-10
6.79
Yes
<=15%
Basic Reading
Reading Fluency
0
7.77
No
-
Decoding
Reading Fluency
-4
7.77
No
<=25%
Decoding
Phonological Processing
-8
3.68
Yes
<=10%
Written Expression
Writing Fluency
-21
10.37
Yes
<=10%
Written Expression
Orthographic Processing
9
10.32
No
<=25%
Composite 1
Composite 2
Reading
Phonological Processing
Orthographic Processing
4
8.56
No
>25%
Note. A negative difference indicates that the second composite has a higher score than the first composite listed
in the comparison.
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 9
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Subtest Standard Score Differences
Difference
Critical value
(0.05)
Significant
difference
Base rate
Pseudoword Decoding
12
8.62
Yes
<=25%
Phonemic Proficiency
Spelling
8
10.36
No
<=25%
Reading Comprehension
Word Reading
0
10.01
No
-
Pseudoword Decoding
Word Reading
5
7.06
No
>25%
Pseudoword Decoding
Reading Comprehension
5
10.27
No
>25%
Oral Reading Fluency
Reading Comprehension
10
12.12
No
<=25%
Oral Reading Fluency
Word Reading
10
9.56
Yes
<=15%
Orthographic Fluency
Word Reading
5
11.61
No
<=25%
Reading Comprehension
Math Problem Solving
-9
12.52
No
<=25%
Word Reading
Spelling
-9
9.10
No
<=15%
Pseudoword Decoding
Spelling
-4
9.39
No
>25%
Subtest 1
Subtest 2
Phonemic Proficiency
Math Problem Solving
Numerical Operations
8
12.34
No
<=25%
Note. A negative difference indicates that the second subtest has a higher score than the first subtest listed in the
comparison.
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 10
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
ERROR ANALYSIS GOAL STATEMENTS
Oral Reading Fluency
Oral Reading Fluency
Annual Goal
- The student will read aloud a/an (circle: expository, narrative) passage at a ____ reading level at ____
correct words per minute with no more than ____ errors.
Short-Term Objectives
- Given ____ phrase cards (cards with short phrases printed on them) that the teacher holds and flips
through as the student reads aloud, providing immediate feedback when a reading error occurs, the student
will correctly read the phrase on each card aloud, and will reduce the time it takes to read the phrase cards
correctly from ____ to ____ seconds.
Phrase examples: under the car; over the house; into the room; next to the dog; across the river
Note: Phrases may begin with prepositional phrases and gradually expand to include participial, gerund,
and infinitive phrases.
- The student will silently read ____ short declarative sentences containing true and false statements, and
circle T or F to indicate true or false after each statement with no more than ____ errors and reduce the
time it takes to complete the task from ____ to ____ seconds.
Sentence examples: A bird has wings. Snow is hot. Blue is a color. Ducks have four legs.
- Given a/an (circle: expository, narrative) passage at a ____ reading level, the student will read the passage
aloud several times (repeated reading), receiving feedback from the teacher as needed to indicate when a
reading error occurs, and will read at least ____ correct words per minute.
Note: Feedback from the teacher to indicate when a reading error occurs may be verbal (e.g., "oops") or
nonverbal (e.g., tap a pencil).
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 11
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Ability-Achievement Discrepancy Analysis
Ability Score Type: WISC-V: FSIQ
Ability Score: 83
Simple Difference Method
FSIQ Score
WIAT-4 Score
Difference
Critical value
(0.05)
Significant
difference
Base rate
Word Reading
83
78
5
8
No
>25%
Reading Comprehension
83
78
5
12
No
>25%
Numerical Operations
83
79
4
10
No
>25%
Reading
83
77
6
9
No
>25%
Mathematics
83
81
2
9
No
>25%
Total Achievement
83
78
5
7
No
>25%
Decoding
83
79
4
7
No
>25%
WIAT-4 Subtests
WIAT-4 Composites
Note. Scores are not reported when the achievement score equals or exceeds the ability scores.
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.
WIAT®-4 Score Report, Age-Based Norms
03/24/2022, Page 12
ID: LauHal
Laura Lee Hall
Pattern of Strengths & Weaknesses Analysis
Area of Processing Strength: WISC-V VCI: 92
Area of Processing Weakness: WISC-V FRI: 74
Area of Achievement Weakness: WIAT-4 Written Expression: 92
Relative
strength
score
Relative
weakness
score
Difference
Critical value
(0.05)
Significant
difference
Supports SLD
hypothesis?
Processing Strength/
Achievement Weakness
92
92
0
11
No
No
Processing Strength/
Processing Weakness
92
74
18
11
Yes
Yes
Comparison
Note. The PSW model is intended to help practitioners generate hypotheses regarding clinical diagnoses. The
analysis should only be used as part of a comprehensive evaluation that incorporates multiple sources of
information.
End of Report
Copyright © 2020 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.