Confidential Psychological Evaluation
Name
: Recca Wrecker
Age
: 22
Date of Birth
: January 1, 1999
Sex
: Male
Citizenship
: Filipino
Date of Report
: May 5, 2022
Name of Examiner
: Conan the Great
Referred by
: Reyn Ocampo
I. Reasons for Referral
The client requested a psychological examination due to a number of personal issues that
have a significant impact on her day-to-day functioning, particularly her work productivity. She
claimed she had been bullied since elementary school and that it was still affecting her life to this
day. She claims to have depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. She admitted that there are
times when she doesn't have enough energy to get through the day. This evaluation is being
conducted to gain a better understanding of the client's current socio-emotional and cognitive
functioning. The assessment's findings are thought to be useful in developing potential treatments
to address the client's existing problem.
II. Evaluation Procedures
A. . Test Administered



Four Temperaments Test
Nonverbal Immediacy Scale
Protestant Work Ethic Scale
III. Behavioral Observations
You can rely in the MSE Checklist
IV. Background Information
You can rely on Social Case History Interview
V. Impressions and Interpretations
Four Temperaments Test:
The calculated scores for each type are shown below (scores range between 0 to 24).
Choleric 12
Melancholic 11
Sanguine 20
Phlegmatic 22
A phlegmatic personality has fundamentally relaxed and quiet, ranging from warmly attentive to
laziness 'four temperaments is phlegmatic. The phlegmatic temperament is lazily sluggish.
Phlegmatics tend to be content with themselves and are kind. They are accepting and
affectionate. They may be receptive and shy and often prefer stability to uncertainty and change.
They are consistent, relaxed, cairn, rational, curious, and observant, qualities that make them
good administrators. They can also be passive-aggressive.
Nonverbal Immediacy Scale:
The client's results from the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale score for nonverbal immediacy was 89.
Higher scores indicate more nonverbal immediacy. The average score for men was 93.8 and the
average score for women was 102.0 in a sample of college students (Richmond et. al.,2033).
Greater levels of nonverbal immediacy are generally seen as positive and are statistically
associated with a variety of positive outcomes. For example, individuals who show higher levels
of nonverbal immediacy get more dates at speed dating events (Houser et. al.,208) and students
of teachers who exhibit more nonverbal immediacy learn more (11ciriguez et. al. 1996).
Protestant Work Ethic Scale:
The client's PWE Scale score was 59 (range: 19 to 95). Higher scores indicate more agreement
with the Protestant Ethic. The average score of college students using this scoring scale is 61
(McHoskey,94). The scores of people who have taken this test here on this website are somewhat
higher. Their distribution is graphed below (n=4,139). Greenberg (1977) found that level of PWE
affects how a person responds to negative feedback. He found that when people with high PWE
received negative feedback on their work, they worked harder next time and the opposite was
true for individuals with low PWE.
Four Temperaments Test:
The calculated scores for each type are shown below (scores range between 0 to 24).
Choleric 10
Melancholic 13
Sanguine 15
Phlegmatic 15
The idea of the four temperaments traces back to an Ancient Greek medical theory that there were four
fundamental bodily humors (blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm) which could cause illness if they
were out of balance. The terms sanguine, choleric, melancholic and phlegmatic were coined by the Greek
physician Aelius Galenus to describe the effect of these humors on human behavior. This idea is perhaps
one of the oldest that looks like a theory of personality. The four temperaments have never been a part of
modern medicine or psychological science, but remain fairly well known due to their use by self-help and
spirituality authors.
The result showed that the respondent's temperament is sanguine. The sanguine temperament is
fundamentally spontaneous and pleasure-seeking; sanguine people are sociable and charismatic. They tend
to enjoy social gatherings, making new friends and tend to be boisterous. They are usually quite creative
and often daydream. However, some alone time is crucial for those of this temperament. Sanguine can also
mean sensitive, compassionate and thoughtful. Sanguine personalities generally struggle with following
tasks all the way through, are chronically late, and tend to be forgetful and sometimes a little sarcastic.
Often, when they pursue a new hobby, they lose interest as soon as it ceases to be engaging or fun. They
are very much people persons. They are talkative and not shy. Sanguines generally have an almost
shameless nature, certain that what they are doing is right. They have no lack of confidence.
Nonverbal Immediacy Scale:
The results from the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale of the clients’ score for nonverbal immediacy
was 76. Higher scores indicate more nonverbal immediacy. The average score for men was 93.8
and the average score for women was 102.0 in a sample of college students (Richmond et.
al.,/03). Greater levels of nonverbal immediacy are generally seen as positive and are statistically
associated with a variety of positive outcomes. For example, individuals who show higher levels
of nonverbal immediacy get more dates at speed dating events (Houser et. al.,_2_0_0a) and
students of teachers who exhibit more nonverbal immediacy learn more (Rodriguez et. al.,1991).
Protestant Work Ethic Scale:
The clients' score was 68 (range: 19 to 95). Higher scores indicate more agreement with the
Protestant Ethic. The average score of college students using this scoring scale is 61 (McHoskey,
1994). The scores of people who have taken this test here on this website are somewhat higher.
Greenberg (1977) found that level of PWE affect how a person responds to negative feedback.
He found that when people with high PWE received negative feedback on their work, they worked
harder next time and the opposite was true for individuals with low PWE.
VI. Summary and Recommendations
Indicate your conclusions, the integrative report of the five tests you administered to your client in
relation to the referral question, as well as your recommendations.
Tests Administered and Evaluated by:
Name and Signature
School