INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY QUARTER 1 (Compilation of Lectures, Discussions and Supplemental Learning Materials) CONTROL NUMBER: __________________________________________ LEARNER’S NAME: __________________________________________ TRACK/ STRAND: __________________________________________ GRADE & SECTION: __________________________________________ ADVISER: __________________________________________ HOME ADDRESS: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ CONTACT NUMBER: __________________________________________ CONTACT NUMBER OF GUARDIAN: _____________________________ COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON Rationale: Philosophy is Love for Wisdom, and Humans are known for their love towards wisdom. This Module is intended to impart the basic concepts about philosophy, and how would we apply it into our daily lives. As we go along out discussions, the reader is much encouraged to give their utmost focus to further understand the concepts given. LESSON 1: DOING PHILOSOPHY Designation: WEEK 1 – WEEK 2 Learning Outcomes Distinguish a holistic perspective from partial point of view; Recognize human activities that emanated from deliberate reflection; Realize the value of doing philosophy in obtaining a broad perspective on life; Do a philosophical reflection on a concrete situation from an holistic perspective. INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSPHY Etymologically, the word Philosophy came from two Greek words “Philo” meaning “Love” and “Sophia” which mean “Wisdom”. Philosophy, hence, is about human’s “Love for Wisdom”. It indicates our quest as human towards greater wisdom along our journey in this life. And to further explain the concept of philosophy, below is the Characteristics of Philosophy: SCIENCE Philosophy is a science because the way we think and process our thoughts is systematic. As we apply philosophy in our way of thinking, we will be able to develop a more organized way of thinking. NATURAL LIGHT OF REASON Philosophy investigates things without the use of any laboratory equipment, instrument, and tools. Instead, a philosopher uses his natural capacity to think to produce his own reason alone. STUDY OF ALL THINGS This characteristic is an evident fact that Philosophy is different from other sciences. Compared to the other Field of Sciences, Philosophy is concerned not only to one or particular object of investigation, but rather is concerned of most things within the environment such as society, religion, language, and among others. FIRST CAUSE OR HIGHEST PRINCIPLE Philosophy believes that whatever comes first into your mind, must be considered along the way. Philosophy values the fact that our initial idea will always be better as long as we take care of it, or develop it. Philosophy also believes the nothing existed without sufficient Reason. 2 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC. COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON BRANCHES OF PHILOSOPHY Philosophy has five distinct branches, namely; (1) Metaphysics, (2) Ethics, (3) Epistemology, (4) Aesthetics, (5) Logic. Branch Metaphysics Ethics Epistemology Aesthetics Logic Description It is a comprehensive process on the quest of the human beings between what is unreal and what is real. It is a branch of Philosophy that explores the nature of moral virtue and evaluates human action. Simply, it is the study of what is good and what is not good. It deals with the nature and expanse, the source, the limitations, and validity, acceptability, and reliability of an acquired knowledge. It is the study of what is beautiful based on perspective of a human person. This branch sets criteria on what is beautiful but definitely, human beings differs from it. It is the Art of Reasoning. This branch is concerned not with the subject, but with the validity of our argument in terms of an object. We can always make reasons, but in logic, not all of it is correct. PHILOSOPHY AS A HOLISTIC APPROACH Brenda Corpuz, et al, stated that “A philosopher’s way of thinking can be described as abstractive. It means that it rises from the level of everyday life to a higher level that gives a bird’s eye view as a whole”. This implies that our knowledge starts from a very basic idea, until it expands into something bigger. Example, when we were kids, we know that the purpose of pencil is only for writing, until we learned that it could be used into making drawings, lettering, and even sketches. Another example is that, when we were kids, the only thing that we know is to add and subtract numbers, until such time that we learn how to multiply and divide them. In our life, we will always learn first the basic, until we reach its complex concepts; and Philosophy is all about seeing things in different perspective. We cannot always stay on the basic as time will come that we have to deal with what is complex into our minds. If we really love and aim for wisdom, we have to bear in mind that we cannot be always on the basic, we have to see things on different perspectives; on different views. In order for us to become an effective thinker; if we really aim towards wisdom, then we have to “think” like a philosopher, and “do” what a philosopher does. 1. GENUINE DESIRE TO KNOW Learning is inevitable. In every experience that we experience, we can learn from it. In everything we see, we can learn something from it. And if we really want “think” life a philosopher, we have to admit that our knowledge is insufficient; we have to admit that we do not know everything. With this, we can direct our minds towards consciousness which will help us to become more aware of the wisdom and learnings surrounding us. 3 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC. COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON 2. THINK OUT OF THE BOX It is commonly observed that a human would always stay on its comfort zone. We usually do that in order to protect our ego, in order to protect ourselves from being hurt, and among various personal reason within us. We are afraid to see what is beyond our limitation and what is beyond what we can see. But philosophy is telling us, that if we really want to learn, we have to THINK OUT OF THE BOX. What is this “Thinking Out of the Box”? the following illustration will show you the explanation of this concept: The circle represents “YOU” inside your comfort zone. The entire shaded area (or box) represents the knowledge, ideas, and concepts surrounding you and your life. The box represents your “COMFORT ZONE”, or your LIFE Thinking about the illustration? Then this what it means. Thinking out of the Box means we have to go out of our comfort zones. Remember that we cannot always live within it through. If you are going to understand the illustration, you can see there that the more you stay on you comfort zone, the more you lose the opportunity towards the learnings that surrounds you. This concept is encouraging us that if we really want to learn, we have to open out minds in all the possibilities that surrounds us. We have to be aware that learning comes after we receive it. We lose it after we reject it. 4 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC. COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON LESSON 2: METHODS OF PHILOSOPHIZING Designation: WEEK 3 – WEEK 4 Learning Outcomes Distinguish opinion from truth; Analyze the situation that shows the difference between opinion and truth; Realize that the methods of philosophy will lead to wisdom and truth; Evaluate Opinions. THE DOMAINS OF TRUTH What is truth? What do we mean that something or let’s say, an argument is true? Many would assume that TRUTH is just a simple term with a singular meaning. But like in reality, Truth is a complex thing that does not just discusses whether a thing is false or true. As per its complexity, let us understand the following Domains of Truth based on Jurgen Habermas: Domains of Truth Objective (Scientific) Truth Social Truth Personal Truth Description This kind of truth pertains to the natural world that maintains a relevant independence from the perspectives of human beings. This are truth that already existed even without the humans like the boiling point of water is 100°C, typhoons come and go, and the human life will always have end. This truth also known as Scientific Truth because it is proven through the scientific methods. This truth is analogous with genera agreement or consensus on a specific matter based on the context of a society where we belong. For example, Christians would not marry another woman because they believe that doing so is a sin, but for the Muslims, it is allowed as long as you take things responsibly and you were able to take care of the welfare of your wives and your kids. On the other hand, these truths can be subjected to change through critical examination and deliberation among the members of the society. This is a kind of truth that requires sincerity and authenticity. It is a truth which is confined within our minds unless it was told to another. This truth cannot simply be measured because no one can go within our minds. For instance, you know to yourself that you can do it, but often, shyness hinders you to do so. Unless you show it off, then it becomes true to other. 5 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC. COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON On the other hand, Richarch Rorty offered a simple way of defining truth. For him; “Truth can be understood as what has passed the procedures of justification.”, and justification pertains to the process of proving the truth or the validity of the statement. With this kind of criteria, we can say that in order to test a Scientific Truth, we have to test it through empirical evidences. If we are to test a Social Truth, we have to check its acceptability to a particular group in a particular time. Whereas, if are to check a Personal Truth, we have to test someone’s consistency and authenticity. EXAMINING OPINIONS Opinions are statements of judgment that needs further justification. A mind must always be ready and prepared in examining the arguments, and basically, not all arguments were made good. How can we say that an argument is acceptable or not? We will go back to Logic which studies and elaborated good way of argumentation. In Logic, we call fake arguments as “Fallacies”. These are a statement that appear to be true but fails to support the conclusion. It is a tricky statement which is usually within a wellarticulated argument. The following are some of the most notable fallacies: Type of Fallacy Description Argumentum ad Hominem (Argument Against a Person) A Fallacy used to convince people by using some of the personal background of a person such as – his / her history, nationality, race, social status, and among others Argumentum ad Baculum (Argument with Force) A kind of fallacy where a person uses force, initiate conflicts, and issues threats to win an argument. Argumentum ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity) This is a kind of statement where emotion is used to win and / or manipulate others’ emotion. Example Statement “How would you trust someone who was known as an Acquitted person?” “Would you give second chance to someone who once broke your heart” “Give that to me, or your friends would know the true you” The famous line of Fernando Poe, Jr. “Hindi ka na sisikatan ng Araw” “Are you not aware that this man is having anxiety? Do you want him to be more tortured by this kind of mental sickness?” “Why are you so rude? Look what have you done, she’s no crying. Would you still pursue that complaint?” 6 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC. COMPILATION 1 QUARTER 1 | INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF A HUMAN PERSON Argumentum ad Populum (Bandwagon Fallacy) Is a kind of statement is a popular strategy in the field of advertising. This is where it goes with the personal sentiments of the people; or going through with the personal choice of the people Example: More people would have the chance to consider a product especially if it is endorsed by the celebrity which they idolize. REFERENCE Dr. Brenda Corpuz, et.al., Introduction to the Philosophy of a Human Person for Senior High School (Core Subject) Dr. Carmela R. Ramos, Introduction to the Philosophy of a Human Person, First Edition 7 |INT EGRAT ED INN OV AT ION AN D HOSP IT ALIT Y CO LLEGE INC.