ORAL PRESENTATION MARKING CRITERIA
1. INFORMAL PEER FEEDBACK ON ORAL PRESENTATION
Give feedback on each presentation using the following table
NAME OF
PRESENTER
Delivery
Clearly
presented
Organised and
easy to follow
Engaged with
the audience
Obvious
enthusiasm for
topic
Visual aids
Clear and
readable slides
Visually
appealing slides
Suitable use of
figures/data/diag
rams
Content
Comprehensive
Well-researched
use of material
Answers to
questions
Thoughtful
Responsive
Drew on
knowledge of
topic beyond
presentation
1- NOT
WELL
ACHIEVED
2
3
4- VERY
WELL
ACHIEVED
COMMENTS
2. LECTURER FEEDBACK ON ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Presentation Grading Criteria
Student name…………………………………….…………Title………………………………………………….
EXCELLENT
(70-100)
Delivery
 Clear and audible
 Appropriate timing
 Engaged with audience
Knowledge and content
 Confident with
subject/material
 Evidence of research
 Able to explain key
ideas/issues
Structure
 Logically organised
 Clear argument with relevant
points
 Appropriate training
Analysis and evaluation
 Balanced evaluation of
information/evidence
 Detailed analysis of material
used
Use of visual aids
 All relevant to content
 Clear and legible
 Used appropriately
Response to questions
 Prepared for questions
 Handled questions
knowledgeably
Team work
 Coherent group presentation
 Individual work wellintegrated into whole
GOOD
(60-70)
SATISFAC
TORY
(50-60)
BELOW
AVERAGE
(40-50)
FAIL
(0-39)
3. PEER ASSESSMENT OF GROUP PRESENTATIONS BY MEMBERS OF TEAM
Use the criteria below to assess your contribution to the group presentation as well as the contribution of
each of your teammates.
0
1
2
3
4
=
=
=
=
=
no contribution
minor contribution
some contribution, but not always effective/successful
some contribution, usually effective/successful
significant contribution
STUDENTS: YOU
GRADING CRITERIA
Ideas for presentation
Analysis and evaluation
of material/data
Participation in group
meetings and
preparation of
presentation
Oral presentation
delivery
TOTAL SCORE