ABSTRACT In this project we use a method to reduce the cost in supply chain management by analysis of job drawings, the process flow related to their manufacturing, control plan for the part and finally cost estimates using the current industry pricing for raw materials, machining operations and processes. This project addresses the issues related to the redundancy in design of the component and checking for pricing of various components that are imported from other companies. Chapter 6.1: Introduction Profit of any commercial organization is depends on its productivity and quality of the product. To improve the profit they need to increase productivity without scarifying quality. To achieve this, it is necessary for organizations to reduce cost in various departments. Supply Chain Management (SCM) is the management of the flow of goods and services. It includes the movement and storage of raw materials, work-in-process inventory, and finished goods from point of origin to point of consumption. Concentric Pumps Pvt. Ltd. is a tier 2 company meaning that the components required for assembly of pumps (gears shafts plugs etc.) are supplied from local companies. The components are only machined and assembled to the vendor specifications. Since the parts were taken in from outside, the company faced a problem with the cost calculations and quotations of the parts. Hence the parts bought were at a high price. The possible solutions to the problem include: Analysis of various processes involved in the manufacturing of that component to check for its redundancy. Check for the prices quoted for the processes against the actual market prices. Check for a cheaper material without altering the mechanical properties. Optimizing design of the parts to reduce material and hence price. Out of the above listed; there was very little scope to change the material specifications of the components. Hence we went ahead with the other three solutions. To implement the solutions, we had to study of drawing of part, the process flow diagram, material specification and the cost calculations of various CNC processes. CHAPTER 6.2: METHODOLOGY A. STUDY OF JOB DRAWINGS From the available job drawing at the company we study the dimensions, cross-section and tolerances of various parts. These recorded dimensions are later used in time and cost calculations of the CNC machine. For instance, let us consider the drawing of ‘D-Plug’ as shown in the figure below. We find that the dimensions are: Root Diameter of the gear = 38.019 mm Outer Diamter of Gear = 44.52 mm Widhth of the Gear = 13 mm Helix Angle of gear = 140 No. of teeth of gear = 17 Note: other required deminsions are duely mentioned on the left hand side of the job drawing. Figure 6. 1: Job Drawing of Gear B. STUDY OF PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM The process flow diagram enlists the various processes associated with the manufacturing of a part. It includes the description of the process, incoming source of variation for the given process, its desired outcome and the process characteristics. For the considered part that is the gear, the processes involved are Bar Cutting, Pre Turning, CNC Turning 1st Setup, CNC Turning 2nd Setup, Hobbing, Debburing & Chamfering, Shaving, Punching, Heat Treatment, Bore Grinding and Roll Testing. The process flow diagram for a few processes is attached below Figure 6. 2 Process Flow of Gear 1. The job is put through CNC 1st Turning Setup, where the incoming sources of variation are Gear Outer Diameter (OD), Bore Diameter, Gear Width, Chamfer etc. These incoming sources result in desired outcomes. These desired outcomes are then generated as Gear OD = 44.60 ± 0.05 Bore diameter = 21.2 ± 0.025 Total width = 14.0 ± 0.20 Surface Roughness = 1.8Ra 2. The job is put through CNC 2nd Turning Setup, where the incoming sources of variation are Gear Outer Diameter (OD), Bore Diameter, Gear Width etc. These incoming sources result in desired outcomes. These desired outcomes are then generated as Gear OD = 44.60 ± 0.05 Total width = 13.0 ± 0.10 Face parallelism = 0.02 max Perpendicularity = 0.02 max Surface Roughness = 1.8Ra C. COST ESTIMATION OF THE GIVEN PART The cost of CNC based parts can be calculated as follows: Total price of component = Cost of Raw Material [BP + Tpt + Icc – ED – VAT] + Cost of Machining [ Cutting + Turning + Hobbing + etc] + Cost of Tooling + Cost of Cleaning and Washing + Cost Inspection and Checking + Cost of Packing and Freight + Over Head and Profit + Cost of Rejection – Cost of Scrap recovery and machining For the previously considered Gear, we now evaluate the various cost involved in the manufacturing of this product. Cost Calculations SR. NO. DESCRIPTION A 1 2 3 4 Bar Route RAW MATERIAL INPUT WEIGHT Net Wt of Gears SCRAP WEIGHT RAW MATERIAL 5 B Landed Price per Kgs RAW MATERIAL COST MACHINEING Finish Weight of Blank Cutting Rough Turning CNC Turning Hobbing Deburing & Chamfering Shaving Punching Nitriding Bore Grinding Tooling Cleaning & Washing Inspection & Checking Packing Freight Upto Lonikand Scrap Recovery in Machineing OH & Profit 15% on RM & Machiening Rejection Round Up Table 6. 1: Cost Calculation for Gear Drive Gear 2559-27T (INP. WT - NET WT) BP ED VAT Tpt Icc less Vat & ED D50*22 EN19T 0.337 KG 0.088 KG 0.249 61.9 Rs/Kg 7.74 12.50% 2.48 4% 1 1 1.238 2% -10.21 64.14 21.61 0.15 5 2.615 2.7 1 1.75 0.26 Kgs 2.946 50 200 450 150 300 2 1 150 300 5% 0.21 25 15% 2% 4.17 8.72 20.25 2.5 8.75 1 8.15 5 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 -5.29 58.24 11.99 0.24 92.08 Cost of Raw Material: It is given by: Landed Price per Kg = Buying price(BP) - Excise Duty (ED) – Value Added Taxes(VAT) + Transportation Cost (Tpt) + Icc Raw Material Cost = Input Weight * Landed Price (per kg) Cost of Machining It is given by the time required for different processes multiplied by cost of machining operation for a particular process. The time computations for various processes are as follows: I. Turning Figure 6. 3: CNC Machine turning A. Machine Speed: To achieve a specific cutting speed: N= k*V * D1 N = machine speed in revolutions/minute (RPM) k is a constant to “correct” speed (V) and part diameter (Di ) units V is desired cutting speed, a Handbook Value D1 is largest part diameter (initial size) V given in surface feet per minute (SFPM), D1 in inches: k = 12 V given in meters per second (MPS), D1 in mm: k = 60000 V given in meters per minute (MPM), D1 in mm: k = 1000 If Cutting Speed for a given RPM rate is desired, solve above equation for V: V = πND/k B. Cutting Time: minutes per operation CT is cutting time per “pass” L is length cut A is “allowance” or starting offset fr is machine feed rate units/revolution, a Handbook Value CT = (L + A) fr*N II. Boring Figure 6. 4: CNC boring A. Machine Speed: As above except D1 is the finished (larger) diameter B. Cutting Time: Same as above III. Facing, Slot Cutting or Cut Off Figure 6. 5: CNC Facing or Slot Cutting In facing, slot (plunge) cutting and cut off, the cutting speed for a given RPM decreases as the tool progresses toward the center of the piece being cut. This follows since most (manual) lathes cannot increase spindle speed (N) during cutting operations. Thus, the required N is calculated as above using the outside (largest) diameter of the part for a given V. A. Machine Speed N = kV D If Cutting Speed for a given RPM rate is desired, solve above equation for V: V = πND/k B. Cutting Time CT = (L + A) fr*N IV. Slab (Horizontal) Milling Terms Used: of Slab CutterMilling FigureN: 6. RPM 6: CNC n: Number of Teeth on Cutter W: Width of cut (may be full cutter or partial cutter) t: depth of cut V: cutting speed -- a Handbook value L: Length of pass or cut fm: Table (machine) Feed ft: feed/tooth of cutter -- a Handbook value D: Cutter Diameter A. Cutting Speed: N = kV D If Cutting Speed for a given RPM rate is desired, solve above equation for V: V = πND/k B. Table Feed Rate: f m = f t * N* n C. Cutting Time: CT = L + LA fm LA is Length of Approach of Tool to Work LA = t(D - t) V. Face (Vertical) Milling: Figure 6. 7: Face (Vertical) Milling Terms Used: N: RPM of Cutter n: Number of Teeth on Cutter W: Width of cut (may be full cutter or partial cutter) t: depth of cutter engagement V: cutting speed -- a Handbook value L: Length of pass or cut fm: Table (machine) Feed ft: feed/tooth of cutter -- a Handbook value D: Cutter Diameter LA: Approach Length LO: Length of “OverTravel” A. Cutting Speed: N = kV D If Cutting Speed for a given RPM rate is desired, solve above equation for V: V = πND/k B. Table Feed: 𝑓𝑚 = 𝑓𝑡 × N × 𝑛 C. Cutting Time: Here several situation must be considered, these include: 1. Tool Not Fully Engaged with W<D/2 2. Tool not Fully Engaged but W> D/2 3. Tool Fully Engaged, Roughing Pass -- Doesn’t require “Full Wipe” 4. Tool Fully Engaged, Finishing Pass -- requires “Full Wiping Action” CT = (L+ LA + LO) fm 1. LA = LO = W(D - W) 2. LA = LO = 3. LA = D 2 D 2 2 2 LO = - 0.5 * D - W 4. LA = LO = D 2 VI. Drilling Figure 6. 8: CNC Drilling A. Drill Speed, RPM N = kV D k is a “Units Constant” D is Drill Diameter V is cutting speed, a Handbook Value, if Cutting Speed for a given RPM rate is desired, solve above equation for V: V = πND/k B. Cutting Time (min) CT = A is allowance; usually f r is drill feedrate L is the length of Hole D 2 (L + A) fr*N MACHINING TIME CALCULATIONS CUTTING SPEED M/MIN DIAMETER RPM CUTTING FEED IN MM/REV TOOL TRAVEL IN MM NO OF CUTS CUTTING TIME ALLOWANCES(LOAD/UNLOAD) TOTAL TIME IN MINUTES CUTTING SPEED M/MIN DIAMETER RPM CUTTING FEED IN MM/REV TOOL TRAVEL IN MM NO OF CUTS CUTTING TIME ALLOWANCES(LOAD/UNLOAD) TOTAL TIME IN MINUTES CUTTING SPEED M/MIN DIAMETER RPM CUTTING FEED IN MM/REV TOOL TRAVEL IN MM NO OF CUTS CUTTING TIME ALLOWANCES(LOAD/UNLOAD) TOTAL TIME IN MINUTES CNC Turning 150 150 150 150 150 47 47 47 47 47 1016 1016 1016 1016 1016 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 23 8 8 23 8 2 2 2 2 2 0.45 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.16 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.953 0.157 0.157 0.953 0.157 2.377 Minutes With 90% Efficiency In 2.615 Minutes 156.9093 Seconds Pre Turning 60 60 60 60 60 50 50 50 50 50 382 382 382 382 382 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 25 17 12 25 12 2 2 2 2 2 0.87 0.59 0.42 0.87 0.42 0.5 0 0.5 0 1.372 0.593 0.419 1.372 0.419 4.175 Minutes With 90% Efficiency In 4.592 Minutes 275.5427 Seconds Hard Turning 150 30 1592 0.1 16 3 0.3 0.5 0.801 0.801 Minutes With 90% Efficiency In 0.882 Minutes 52.89504 Seconds Table 6. 2: Machining Time Calculations VII. Hobbing Time Hobbing is a continuous gear generation process widely used in the industry for high or low volume production of external cylindrical gears. Depending on the tooth size, gears and splines are hobbed in a single pass or in a two-pass cycle consisting of a toughing cut followed by a finishing cut. State-of-the-art hobbing machines have the capability to vary cutting parameters between first and second cut so that a different formula is used to calculate cycle times for single-cut and double-cut hobbing. Figure 6. 9: Hobbing of Gear Single Cut Hobbing Cycle The cycle time is given by the equation, T= Z *L N *K *F where T = cycle time in minutes Z = number of gear teeth L = length of cut in inches N = hob revolutions per minute K = number of hob starts F = feed rate in inches per revolution of work HOBBING TIME CALCULATION JD Gear 4287-27 SRNO. PARAMETER 1 NO. OF TEETH OF GEAR 2 NO. OF STARTS OF HOB 3 AXIAL FEED (MM/WORK REV) 4 HOB RPM 5 WIDTH OF GEAR 6 O.D. OF GEAR 7 ROOT DIA OF GEAR 8 HELIX ANGLE OF GEAR 9 LEAD ANGLE OF HOB PRESSURE ANGLE OF 10 COMPONENT 11 O.D. OF HOB 12 LOADING / UNLOADING HOBBING TIME IN MINUTES Shaving Time Table 6. 3: Hobbing Time Calculation VALUE 17 1 1.6 250 13 44.52 38.019 14 2.17 17 80 1 2.7 1.75 NOTE: The cost of machining operation per hour is quoted by the company and those prices cannot negotiated. The cost of cleaning and washing, Inspection and Checking, Packing and Freight are also quoted by the company. Cost of Scrap recovery and machining Scrap weight = Input Weight (Weight of the Blank) – Net Weight (Finished weight of Gear) Scrap Recovery = Scrap Weight * Cost of Scrap per Kg NOTE: Cost of Scrap per kg varies from company to company. Overhead and Profit is considered as 15% on Raw Material and Machining. Cost of Rejection is considered 2% of the overhead and profit. CHAPTER 6.3: RESULT AND DISCUSSION Part no. Part Desc. Raw Material RM Rate Table 1: Company Quotation 2523-27 Water Pump Drive Gear Gross wt. Cut weight Forging wt. Finish wt. Scrap wt. (Forging) RM cost Scrap Cost Bar Cutting Hardening & Tempering Rough Turning CNC Turning Hobbing Tooling Cost Shaving Tooling Cost Machine Deburring Punching & Marking Heat Treatment (Gas Nitriding) Hard Turning Sub Total ICC on RM Rejection Profit Over Head Packing & Freight Total Scrap machining Total Table 6. 4: Company Quotation EN19T 60 Bar Route 0.32 0.26 Rs./Kg Rs./Kg 15 220 450 2 2 275 2 100 1 105 290 3% 2% 10% 10% Pune 1 0.123 0.042 19.2 -0.76 3.05 3.9 3 7.33 15 2 9.17 2 1.67 1 12.915 4.83 58.92 0.78 1.7 5.89 5.89 1.55 100.13 -2.19 102.32 Table 2: Cost Calculations SR. NO. DESCRIPTION A 1 2 Bar Route RAW MATERIAL INPUT WEIGHT Net Wt of Gears 3 4 SCRAP WEIGHT RAW MATERIAL Drive Gear 2559-27T D50*22 EN19T 0.337 KG 0.088 KG (INP. WT - NET WT) BP ED VAT Tpt Icc less Vat & ED 5 B Landed Price per Kgs RAW MATERIAL COST MACHINEING Finish Weight of Blank Cutting Rough Turning CNC Turning Hobbing Deburing & Chamfering Shaving Punching Nitriding Bore Grinding Tooling Cleaning & Washing Inspection & Checking Packing Freight Upto Lonikand Scrap Recovery in Machineing OH & Profit 15% on RM & Machiening Rejection Round Up Table 6. 5: Cost Calculations for Drive Gear 2559-27T 0.249 61.9 Rs/Kg 7.74 12.50% 2.48 4% 1 1 1.238 2% 10.21 64.14 21.61 0.15 5 2.615 2.7 1 1.75 0.26 Kgs 2.946 50 200 450 150 300 2 1 150 300 5% 0.21 25 15% 2% 4.17 8.72 20.25 2.5 8.75 1 8.15 5 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 -5.29 58.24 11.99 0.24 92.08 Table 1 shows the quotation and cost break up of manufacturing the gear. The estimates were analysed by us using the above mentioned methodologies and we found the following things that added to the cost: The quotation had redundant processes like hardening and tempering and hard turning. The cost of processes was quoted higher that what was calculated like nitriding, tooling etc. The scrap weight calculated was significantly low than what was expected. To remove the above stated anomalies we recalculated the cost break up using maximum possible values for raw materials and processes (time taken maximum). We even considered processes like cleaning washing inspection etc. Even after the considerations we found a significant difference in the pricing of the component. The changes in the above anomalies are made and tabulated as shown in Table 2. CHAPTER 6.4: Conclusion Remarks And Scope For Future Work By the implementation of solutions to the problems we find that the cost of manufacturing 1 gear goes down by Rs. 10.24. The company requires 10000 gears per month so that the manufacturing process is not stagnant. Hence, Number of gears ordered per month = 10000 Difference in price per component = 102.32-92.08 = Rs. 10.24 Saving per month = 10.24*10000 = Rs. 10,2400 Savings per year = 102400*12 = Rs. 12,28800 Percentage savings = (10.24/102.32)*100% = 10% The price of component can be further brought down if the exact price of raw materials can be determined. Moreover a detailed process study will show that some of the conventional processes may be replaced by newer and fewer CNC operations. Also, there is scope to change the material specifications by cheaper materials without compromising with the quality of the finished product. Lastly the design can be optimised so that the part manufactured is made using lesser material.