SUPPLIER ASSESSMENT SUPPLIER NAME: CONTACT PERSON: POSITION: SUPPLIER LOCATION: Existing Supplier New Supplier Current 6 Month DPPM Average (where applicable) Current 6 Month OTD Average (where applicable) TYPES OF OPERATION: FOUNDRY MACHINING FABRICATION FULL MANUFACTURING RAW MATERIAL DISTRIBUTOR OTHERS (Reference Welding, Coating, NDE Testing Tabs as applicable) Specify here: Supplier Self-Assessment Weir Audit EVALUATOR: DATE: FOR WEIR OIL & GAS USE ONLY Weir Quality Leader Signature & Date: Weir Supply Chain Leader Signature & Date: WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019 Page 1 of 5 # Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnelPrinted or by NDA copies are UNCONTROLLED. CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Company: Address: City: State: Phone Number: Fax Number: Web site: Contact person 1: Position: Phone No: E-Mail: Contact Person 2: Position: Phone No: E-Mail: GENERAL INFORMATION Business Type: Product / Service (WEIR): Other Capabilities: Year Established: Company Ownership: Major Customers: Number of Employees: Number of Shifts: Annual Sales: IT Readiness (Systems): Management System Certificates: WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019 Page 2 of 5 # Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDA Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED. Context of the Organization & Quality Management Key Word Leadership Support 4 3 2 1 Is the company ISO 9001 certified? Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place 2 Quality System Is the company ISO 14001/ OHSAS certified? Yes, valid certification System,but not certified No system in place 3 Extenal & Internal Issue Is the company has determines external and internal issues relevant to its purpose and strategic direction? Yes Yes, not documented No 4 Interested Parties Is the company has determines what interested parties are relevant to the QMS? Yes Yes, not documented No 5 Quality System Is the quality system defined & documented? Yes Yes, not documented No 6 Documentation Is the company's documents & records properly controlled? Yes Partially No 7 Doc's review Does the company review customer & general engineering standards/specs? Yes Only when notified No Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 QA Policy Is there a Quality policy available / displayed / understood? Avl,displayed,understood Policy awareness,not defined None 2 Vision / Mission Company vision / mission communicated / discussed with employees? Communicate/documented Discussed,not documented None in place 3 Performance Does the company set out KPIs, being tracked/ monitored/ reviewed? Yes Some evident No KPI's 4 Continual Improvement Are continual improvement tracked / monitored / reviewed? Yes Some evident No 5 Customer focus Are customer requirements determined,met for increased customer satisfaction? Determined & met Some evident Not determined 6 Role/ responsibilities/ Authority Does responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles are assigned, communicated and understood within the organization. Yes & effective Some communication evident No communication Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 Training Are employees trained to perform their job functions? Yes, trained with records Some training evident None evident 2 Training Are employees competent to perform their job functions? Yes, with assessment records Competency observed No evidence 3 Infrastructure Does the company have the necessary infrastructure (buildings, equipments, transport,IT.)? Yes, effective Partially / Able to invest Not satisfactory 4 Plant layout Does the company have any plant layouts available? Yes & documented Yes but not documented None available 5 Work environment Does the company consider personnel safety within the manufacturing process? Yes, effectively Yes but not effectively Not at all Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 1 Product Acceptance Does the company verify,validate,monitor, and / or inspect customer product? All evident with records Some evident None evident 2 Change Control Are the effects of any change (drawings,etc) properly controlled? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 3 Requirements Are customer requirements such as delivery (packaging) & post delivery (warranty) evident? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 4 Communication Does the company have a proper communication system with the customer? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No system evident 5 Communication Is the necessary info communicated,to the customer, in the appropriate method/language? Yes Partially No 6 Product Design Is there a process of verifying / validating new product (ex OTSR)? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 7 Supplier monitoring Does the company track / monitor supplier PPM for improvement initiatives? Displayed with targets vs actual Some evident No system evident 8 Supplier monitoring Does the company track / monitor supplier OTD for improvement initiatives? Displayed with targets vs actual Some evident No system evident 9 Production Process Is information available on daily Production such as schedule adherence & discussed? Yes, documented & discussed Yes, not documented No evidence 10 Maintenance Is there any maintenance / preventative maintenance activities evident? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 11 Tooling Are any manufacturing tooling requirements available & demonstrated? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 12 Identification Does the company identify product through process for traceability purposes (Internal)? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 13 Conformity Is measurement equipment verified for manufacturing process (ex. Calibrated, GR&R)? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence Key Word Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 1 Monitoring Does the company demonstrate any measurement,analysis & improvement processes? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 2 Non conformances Does the company track / monitor scrap for improvement initiatives? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No tracking of scrap 3 Continuous Improvement Does the company demonstrate internal audits for continuous improvement? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 4 Continuous Improvement Does the company monitor actions from audits regularly? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 5 Monitoring Does the company demonstrate any monitoring & measurement of product? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 6 Data Analysis Is the company demonstrating appropriate analysis of data (ex. Product conformance)? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 7 Continuous Improvement Does the company demonstrate any cont. improvement (ex. Kaizen,6 Sigma, Lean) Demonstrated & defined Demonstrated, not defined No cont. improvement 8 Problem Solving Does the company demonstrate effective problem solving leading to root cause identification? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 9 Corrective Action Does the company take necessary CA to eliminate causes of non-conformities from customer? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 10 Corrective Action Are the corrective actions effective (any recurrences)? Yes,documented,effective Partially, & / or with recurrences No evidence 11 Poka yoke Is there any usage of poka yoke in the process? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence Key Word 1 PPE 3 Housekeeping 4 5S 5 Environment 6 Safety Machinery 7 Safety Lifting Ops 8 Safety Segregation 9 Environment & Safety 10 Environment 11 Safety Risk Prog. 12 Environment Risk Prog. Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 Is the necessary protective equipment worn in designated areas? Yes Partially None Are work areas clean & orderly? Yes Partially No Are any 5S principles evident? Yes & documented Partially None Do working areas have sufficient space, lightening,and ergonomically position? Yes Partially None Are primary moving parts of machines adequately guarded ? Yes Partially None Are lifting operations / use of cranes and fork lift trucks safe ? Yes Partially None Are workers segregated from traffic movement and other high risk activities (e.g. metal pouring) where required? Yes Partially None Are chemical risks adequately controlled (storage and spillage) ? Yes Partially None Is there a waste management system / process in place - segregate / recycle? Yes Partially None Is there a robust risk assessment / job safety analysis programme in place ? Yes & documented Partially None Is there a robust environmental impacts and aspects assessment programme in place? Yes & documented Partially None Overall Score (Average) Overall Avg. Score > 4.50 4.00 -- 4.50 3.25 -- < 4.0 > 2.00 -- < 3.25 0.00 -- 2.00 Ratings Excellent Good Satisfactory Adequate Unsatisfactory AVG. SCORE AVG. 0 1 Analysis Criteria SCORE 0 1 Key Word Operation 5 Quality System Key Word Measurement, Analysis & Improvement Evaluation Score: 1 Key Word Health, Safety & Environment Analysis Criteria SCORE AVG. 0 SCORE AVG. 0 SCORE AVG. 0 SCORE AVG. 0 0.000 Development Required Not required Required Required Required Alternative supplier to be considered WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019 Page 3 of 5 # Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDA Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED. General Calibration Requirements General Product Inspection Controls Design Data & Change Control Quality / Inspection System & Procedures General Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 4 3 2 1 1 Are Management responsibilities that affect quality clearly defined? Yes Partially No 2 Is contract review performed to identify and evaluate Quality Requirements? Yes Partially No 3 Does a procedure exist for quality review for an amendment to a contract? Yes Partially No 4 Is an organizational chart available show the relationship of Quality Control to other Management functions? Yes Partially No Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 Is there a list of approved suppliers maintained and periodically updated? Yes Partially No 2 Are there procedures for preservation, packaging, storeage, marking and shipping? Yes Yes, not documented No 3 Are there Quality incentive programs? Yes Yes, not documented No 4 Is there a procedure for handling non-conforming material? Yes Yes, not documented No 5 Are training programs implemented in your Quality System? Yes, trained with records Some training evident None evident Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 Are procedures in effect to assure that the drawings, specifications, and instructions required by the contract as well as applicable changes are used for processing? Yes Yes, not documented No 2 Are drawings and specifications available to inspection personnel at point of use? Yes & Evidence Some Evident No evidence 3 Does a master list of drawing and specs exist, including customer furnished documents. Yes Partially No 4 Does a system exist for controlling and removing obsolete documents? Yes & documented Yes but not documented None available Evaluation Score: 5 4 3 2 1 1 Is there a system in place to cover the control of non-conforming materials? All evident with records Some evident None evident 2 Is approval to use or rework nonconforming material obtained from customer? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 3 Is Receiving Inspection performed to written procedures? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 4 Is inspection performed by someone other than the one who filled the order or produced the item? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No system evident 5 Is there a system in place which indicates a products inspection status throughout all stages of manufacturing? Yes Partially No 6 Are statistical process control (SPC) techniques used in your facility? Yes, not documented No evidence 7 Are shop travelers, operation sheets and/or inspection instructions used during manufacturing process? Yes & documented Displayed with targets vs actual Some evident No system evident Analysis Criteria Evaluation Score: 5 Are records of calibrations maintained and traceable to measuring and test equipment? 3 2 1 Yes, not documented No evidence Yes, not documented Documentation exists but is not detailed No Evidence 3 Are adequate inspection and test equipment provided and maintained? Yes & documented Does Calibration documentation include appropriate notification procedures for cases of significant out of tolerance conditions? Yes & documented 4 Are measuring and test equipment inspected and calibrated at pre-established intervals? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 5 Does a procedure exist for the recall of product due to an out of tolerance condition? Yes & documented Yes, not documented No evidence 1 2 ISO 9001 2 API 3 ASME 4 ASNT 5 CE / PED 6 MIL-Q9858A 7 MIL-I-45208A 8 Other Overall Score (Average) Development Required Not required Required Required Alternative supplier to be considered Analysis Criteria 1 Yes & documented 4 Registrar Registration # AVG. SCORE AVG. 0 1 Analysis Criteria SCORE 0 1 Overall Avg. Score Ratings > 4.50 Excellent 4.00 -- 4.50 Good > 2.00 -- < 4.0 Adequate 0.00 -- 2.00 Unsatisfactory General Calibration Requirements 5 SCORE AVG. 0 SCORE AVG. 0 SCORE AVG. 0 No evidence 0.000 Expiration Date WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019 Page 4 of 5 # Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDA Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED. SUPPLIER EVALUATION FEEDBACK REPORT Ref Description of area for improvement Evidence (Photo) Corrective Action Responsible Deadline Status 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WOG-DF-Q 001, Rev 0, May 20, 2019 Page 5 of 5 # Confidential - Access limited to Weir personnel or by NDA Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
