URAYAN, Djohamie Denise V. 118-0040 INSIGHT INTO CONSUMER DECISION MAKING FOR 3-D TV 1. First, quickly at a glance, what TV do you think you would buy? At a first glance, as a customer, I will prefer to buy LG Model PX950. 2. On what criteria do you think you based that decision? Among all the televisions offered, it has the cheapest price and its features possess positive reviews from the customers. Try these decision-making processes, see what brand results for each, and see how confident you feel about the resulting brand suggested from each approach: 3. What attribute do you find least informative? Eliminate that row. Continued to do so until a clear brand winner emerges. The attributes that I find the least informative are the following: a. 3-D Glasses - Wearing a pair 3-D glasses are not preferable because most of the time, I only watch a television when I watch news. 3-D glasses are specifically intended for action movies. In addition, I am not fond of watching movies. I prefer reading books. Lastly, it would cost me again $150. b. 3-D from angle - Honestly, the 3-D feature of a television doesn't attract me to buy this specific television. 4. Which brand of TV would seem to be the riskiest to buy? Eliminate it. Continue until an obvious choice result. The brand of television that would be the riskiest to buy is Samsung Model UNC8000 because it costs $2,999 and received neutral reviews from the customers. Based on the information, for me, customers were not satisfied with its features given its expensive price. The next brand of television that would be eliminated is Sony XBR-HX909 since according to customers, it usually flickers or blinks, the gray color that appears when it has lost its connection. Lastly, Panasonic TC-PVT25 would also be eliminated from my choice. Actually, I am torn between choosing Panasonic and LG because of the customer reviews. Since LG is cheaper than Panasonic, I would prefer to eliminate Panasonic since the additional cost of $629 outweighs the benefits. 5. If you made a price-based decision, would you be happy? As a customer, I would be happy to purchase using a price-based decision especially when that specific item is worth its price compared to my other choices. 6. How would your final brand choice define you? I think my choice would define me as a person practicing practicality. As long as the television gives me quality colors and does not case eye pain, I'm fine with it. Which of these criteria wouldn't have concerned you? How similar was the thought process to your natural analysis? How can you find out if your consumers along this line? The criteria that would not bother me is the 3-D glasses and 3-D from angle because of the reasons stated above. On the other hand, the decision-making process of the mini-case is very similar with my natural analysis. I always consider previous customers' reviews. I also rank my choices according to their features. Moreover, whenever there are features that I am not familiar with, specifically the crosstalk and 3-D from angle, I first conduct a research about it to be able to identify if that specific feature would concern or bother me. As a marketing person, to be able to determine if the consumers think along these lines, I would conduct a research about the features the consumers always consider when purchasing a specific item. Finally, I would also conduct a competitor benchmarking analysis to be able to watch out for models that received positive customer reviews so that the company would be able to adjust or outperform those offered by competitors.