Uploaded by Amal Alshardan

Rubric for Evaluating Project Presentation

advertisement
Rubric for Evaluating IS 340 Project Presentation
Attribute
1-Not acceptable
2-Below expectations 3-Meets expectations
4-Exceeds expectations Score
0 less than ½
½ to less than ¾
¾ to less than full
Full
some content placed
incorrectly in slides
content appropriate to
all slides
some portions are
sloppy and difficulty to
read; style needs
improvement
excellent organization
enhances readability
and/or understandability
of slides
text, tables, figures
,fount readable and
understandable; style is text, tables, figures,
acceptable
fonts so clear and
understandable as to
followed specified
enhance slides impact;
format
style enhances
readability
Presentation Mechanics
Organization & inappropriate
Format
content of several
slides
20%
unacceptable
appearance e.g.,
tables and figures
cannot be read or
understood, fonts
too small or too big
a few format errors
difficult to read;
style unclear
unique format aspects
that enhance slides
impact
so many format
errors
Spelling
Grammar and
Punctuation
10%
many spellings
errors
paragraphs with
multiple grammar
and punctuation
errors
only spelling errors are no spelling errors
different spellings for
minor grammar or
same pronunciation
punctuation errors
a few significant
grammar and
punctuation errors
no grammar or
punctuation errors
Creativity (10%) Straightforward, No Some creative aspects more creative aspects Very creative in design
creative design or Such as creative design Such as creative design and presentation of the
ideas
or ideas
or ideas
topic
Attribute
1-Not acceptable
2-Below expectations 3-Meets expectations
4-Exceeds expectations Score
0 less than ½
½ to less than ¾
¾ to less than full
Full
a few aspects of the
topic is missing
Topic covered in its
entirety
material added
enhances quality of the
term paper
Content
Delivery
oral
Topic is
incompletely
covered
Rubric for Evaluating IS 340 Project Presentation
Contents not
explained, missing,
incomplete or
incorrect
description,
assumptions not
listed, contains
results/conclusions
References
provided are
appropriate
Contents explained,
perhaps poorly; no, or
limited discussion of
constraints and
assumptions
incorrect format,
not cited in report
Contents explained
so clear, complete, and
clearly, and assumptions enhanced with
clearly listed with some appropriate detail
detail
correct format, all cited
in report
5%
Attribute
1-Not acceptable
2-Below expectations 3-Meets expectations
4-Exceeds expectations Score
0 less than ½
½ to less than ¾
Full
¾ to less than full
Delivery
appearance
No diagramsOr few incorrect
diagrams
Few diagrams added or Most required diagrams All required diagrams
diagrams with
added with correct and added with correct and
incorrect and
appropriate detail
appropriate detail
inappropriate detail
Nonverbal skills
Verbal skills
Awareness of
audience
Engagement of
audience
Teamwork
TOTAL POINTS
Download