I. INTRODUCTION to COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY Tuesday, August 31, 2021 11:05 PM Guide Questions: 1. What is cognitive psychology? 2. How did psychology develop as a science? 3. How did cognitive psychology develop from psychology? 4. How have other disciplines contributed to the development of theory and research in cognitive psychology? 5. What methods do cognitive psychologist use to study how people think? 6. What are the current issues and various fields of the study within cognitive psychology? COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY the study of how people perceive, learn, remember, and think about info how people perceive various shapes, why they remember some facts but forget others, how they learn languages PHILOSOPHICAL ORIGINS OF PSYCHOLOGY: RATIONALISM VERSUS EMPIRICISM Where and when did the study of cognitive psychology begin? Approaches to understand the human mind; o Philosophy o Physiology PHILOSOPHY: Understand the general nature of many aspects of the world, in part through introspection, the examination of inner ideas and experiences INTROSPECT - intro ("inward, within") and spect ("look") PHYSIOLOGY - study of life-sustaining functions in living matter, primarily through empirical observations RATIONALISM and EMPIRICISM PLATO and ARISTOTLE - affected modern thinking in psychology and many other fields -disagreed on how to investigate ideas PLATO (RATIONALIST) route to knowledge is through thinking and logical analysis does not need experiments to develop new knowledge reason is a source of knowledge or justification ARISTOTLE (EMPIRICIST) we acquire knowledge via empirical evidence obtain evidence through experience and observation design experiment and conduct studies in which they would observe the behavior and processes of interest to them AVAILABILTY HEURISTIC- examples immediately come to mind HEURISTICS- mental shortcuts to process info Understanding cognitive psychology can help us understand much of what goes on in our everyday lives. WHY STUDY THE HISTORY OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY? If we know where we come from, we may better understand where we are heading. In addition, we can learn from past mistakes. Fundamental questions are the same but ways of addressing issues have changes DIALECTIC - approaches and ways scientist study issues cognitive psychology change over time developmental process whereby ideas evolve over time DIALECTICAL PROCESS: A thesis is proposed o Thesis - statement of belief An antithesis emerges o Antithesis - counters thesis A synthesis integrates the viewpoints o debate between thesis and antithesis which integrate the most credible features of each view The dialectic is important bcuz we may be tempted to think that if one view is right, another seemingly contrasting view must be wrong RATIONALISM important in theory development rationalist theories without any connection to observations gained through empiricist methods may not be valid mountains of observational data without an organizing theoretical framework may not be meaningful RENE DESCARTES French Rationalist reflective method as being superior to empirical methods for finding the truth Cogito, ergo sum ( I think, therefore I am" only proof of his existence is that he was thinking and doubting one could not rely on one's senses because those very senses have often proven to be deceptive (optical illusions) JOHN LOCKE British empiricist believed that humans are born without knowledge and therefore must seek knowledge through empirical observations tabul rasa (blank slate) life and experience "write" knowledge in us study of learning was the key to understanding the human mind there are no innate ideas NURTURE WORKS IN DIFFERENT WAYS Asian cultures o dialectical in thinking o Tolerant of holding beliefs that are contradictory o Resolution will resolve the conflict in their beliefs European and North American o o Linear Belief system is consistent Western cultures o process objects independently of the context Eastern cultures o Look at objects embedded in their surrounding context Asians o Emphasize the context more than the objects embedded in those context If a synthesis advances our understanding of a subject, it then serves as a new thesis. A new antithesis then follows it, then a new synthesis, and so on. PSYCHOLOGICAL ORIGINS IN COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive psychology has roots in many different ideas and approaches Approaches that will be examined include early approaches such as structuralism and functionalism, followed by a discussion of associationism, behaviorism and Gestalt psychology EARLY DIALECTS IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF COGNITION Psychology only recently emerged as a new independent field of study developed in a dialectical way an approach to studying the mind would be developed; people then would use it to explore the human psyche UNDERSTANDING THE STRUCTURALISM OF THE MIND STRUCTURALISM o first major school of though in Psychology o understand the STRUCTURE (configuration of elements of the mind) and its perceptions o analyzing perceptions into teir constituent comnents affection attention memory sensation WHILHELM WUNDT o German psychologist o contributed to development of structuralism o often viewed as founder of structuralism on psychology o used INTROSPECTION as meethod in research INTROSPECTION - conscious observation of one's own thinking process look at the elementary component of an object or process METHODS to GAIN KNOWLEDGE RATIONALISM - reflective thinking and logicl analysis EMPIRICISM - through observation SYNTHESIS - use of observation, thinking and logical analysis ROOTS of COGNITIVE PSYCH: APPROACHES to STUDYING the MIND - Method Used- What is Studies STRUCTURALISM - Introspection - Structure of Mind FUNCTIONALISM- depends - process of how mind works PRAGMATSM- various - research applied to real world SYNTHESIS (Associationism)- Ebbbinghaus used himself as a subject; Throndlike used cats and humans -how learning takes place by associating things with each other BEHAVIORISM(extreme associationism)- use of animals and humans in research; quantitative analysis- relations between observable behavior and environmental events/stimuli GESTALT PSYCHOLOGY- introspection, experiments- psychological phenomena studies as organized wholes SYNTHESIS(Cognitivism) - experiments computer simulation, protocol analysis - understand behavior through the ways people think Intro of introspection as an experimental method was an important change in the field Main emphasis in the study of the mind shifted from rationalist approach to empiricist approach of observing behavior to draw conclusions about the subject Experiments involving introspection, indivs reported on their thoughts as they were working on a given task CHALLENGES is the METHOD OF INTROSPECTION: 1. May not always be able to say exactly what goes through thei mind or may not be able to put it into words 2. What they say may niot be accurate 3. People working on a task may alter the processes EDWARD TITCHENER follower of Wundt firstt full-fledgd structuralilst helped bting structualism to the US use introspection in research explore sych from vantage point of the experiencing individual UNDERSTANDING THE PROCES OF THE MIND: FUNCTIONALISM developed as an alternative to structuralism "psychologists should focus on the processes of thought rather than its contents understand what people do and why they do it FUNCTIONALIST- study the process of how and why the mind works, rather than study the structural contents and elements of the mind PRAGMATISTS believe that knowledge is validated by its usefulness want to know what we can do with our knowledge of what people do WILLIAM JAMES leader in guiding functionalism toward pragmatism Principles in Psychology core topics in the field: ATTENTION, CONSCIOUSNESS, PERCEPTION JOHN DEWEY early pragmatist influenced contemprary thinking in cogni psych pragmatic approach to thinking and schooling AN ALTRNATIVE SYNTHESS: ASSOCIATIONISM influential way of thinking than rigid school of psych examine how elements of the mind (events/ ideas), can become associated with one another in the mind to result in a form of learning May result from: contiguity - occur together at about the same time similarity - similar features or properties contrast - things that show polarities (hot-cold, light-dark, day-night) *Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve - show that fist few repetitions result in steep learning curve. Later repetitions result in slower increase of remembered words HERMANN EBBINGHAUS first experimenter to apply accociationist principles systematically studied his own mental processes made up list of nonsense syllables studied how people learn and remember material through rehearsal REHEARSAL - conscious repetition of material to be learned found that frequent repetition can fix mental association more firmly in memory repetition aids in learning EDWARD LEE THORNDIKE "Satisfaction" is the key to forming associations Law of Effect - stimulus tend to produce a certain response over time if an organism is rewarded for that response It's Only What You Can See That Counts: Associationism to Behaviorism BEHAVIORISM - focus only on the relation between observable behaviorand environmental events or stimuli Make physical whatever others might have called "mental" IVAN PAVLOV Nobel Prize winning physiologist studied involuntary learning behavior began with the observation that dogs salivate in response to the sight of lab tech that fed them Classical Conditioning Learning - dogs had no conscious control involves more than an association based on temporal contiguity effective conditioning requires contingency on the presentation of the conditioned stimulus contingencies in form of reward and punishment are still used in the 21st cent. doing something (repeatedly) to have someone react a certain way when that action is done = repeated action to stimulate response* RADICAL BEHAVIORISTS any hypothesis about internal thoughs and ways of thinking are nothing more than speculation tried to influence the way people handle problems in everyday life, from chld-rearig, to schooling, even to close personal rel. PROPONENTS OF BEHAVIORISM: JOHN WATSON father of radical behaviorism no use for internal mental contents (thoughts) or mechanisms believed tha psyschologists should concentrate only on the study of observable behavior dismissed thinking as nothing more than sub-vocalized speech RADICAL BEHAVIORISM B.F. SKINNER radical behaviorist virtually all forms of human behavior, not just learning, could be explained by reactions to the envi. researched primarily with nonhuman subjects rejected mental mechanisms operant conditioning Operant Conditioning involving the strengthenig or weakening of behavior contingent on the presence or absence of reinforcement (reward) or punishments could explain all forms of human behavior applies experimental analysis of behavior to many psychologiclal phenomena (learning, language acquisition, problem solving) CRITICISMS OF BEHAVIORISM 1. Behaviorism did nor account as well for complex mental activities (language learning & problem solving) 2. wanting to know what went on inside the head 3. using techniques of behaviorism to study nonhuman subjects was often easier than studying humans *Behaviorists Daring to Peek into the Black Box Behaviorists regarded the mind as a black box that is best understood in erms of its input and output, but whose internal processes cannot be accurately described because they are not observable EDWARD TOL-MAN critic though that understanding behavior required tking into account the purpose of, and the pla for, the behavior all behavior is directed toward a goal viewed as forefather of modern cognitive psychology The Whole is More than The Sum of its Parts Gestalt Psychology We best understand osychological phenomena when we view them as organized, structured wholes we cannot fully understand behavior when we only break phenmena down into smaller parts GESTATLTISTS studied insight to understand the unobservable mental event by which someone goes from having no idea about hot to solve a problem to understanding it fully in what seems a mere moment of time EMERGENCE OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 1950's = "cognitive revolution" movement; in reponse to behaviorism COGNITIVISM -most human behavior explains how people think rejects behavioristicnotio that psychologits should avoid studying mental processes just becaue they are unobservable synthesis of earlier forms of analysis, such as behaviorism and Gestaltism adopts precise quantitative analysis to study how people learn and think like Gestaltism; emphasizes internal mental processes EARLY ROLE OF COGNI. NEUROSCIENCE KARL SPENCER LASHLEY challenged behaviorist view that the human brain is a passive organ merely responding to environmental contingencies outside the indiv. brain- an active, dynmic organizer of behavior sought to understand how macro-org of human brain made possible complex, planned activities(musical, gaming, using language) DONALD HEBB propose concept of cell assemlblies as basis for learning in the brain cell assemblies = coordinated neural structures that develop through freq. simulation develop over time as ability of one neuron(nerve cell) to stimulate firing in a connected neuron increases NOAM CHOMSKY (linguist) wrote a scathing review of Skinner's ideas stressed both bio basis and the creative potential of language pointed out the infinite numbers of sentences we can produce with ease defied behaviorist notions that we learn language by reinforcement TURING soon it will be hard to distinguish communication of machines from that of humans TURING TEST - judges whether a computer program's output v.s. output of humans interrogator communicates via computer and keyboard with real human and computer; find out who is the computer by asking questions ARTIFICAL INTELIGENCE (AI) human attempts to construct systems that show intelligence processing info "THE MAGIC NO. 7" GEORGE MILLER no.7 appeared in many diff. places in cogni psych. (literature on prception and memory) hidden meaning in frequent reappearance? JERRY FODOR Conceptof the modularity of the mind mind has distinct modules , special-purpose systems, to deal with linguistics and possible other info MODULARITY - processs that are used in one domain of processing(linguistic or perpetual domain) operate independently of processes in ther domains FRANZ JOSEPH GALL (PHRENOLOGIST) patterns of bumps and swells on skullis associatedwith one's pattern of cogni skills not scientifically valid; mental catography lingered and gave rise to ideas of modularity based on modern scientific techniques RESEARCH METHODS IN COGNI PSYCH Laboratory or other controlled experiments Neuro scientific research Self-Reports Case Studies Naturalisic Observation Computer Simulations AI DATA GATHERING reflects empirical aspect of the scientific enterprise THEORY organized body of general explanatory principles; based on observation HYPOTHESIS tentative proposals regaring expected empirical consequences of the theory, such as the outcomes of research and is tested through experimentation must be subjected to statistical analysis and determine stat significance STATISTCAL SIGNIFICANCE indicates the likelihood that a given set o results would obtain if only chance factors were in operation INVESTIGATIVE CYCLE theories give rise to hypotheses that can be tested and often lead to a revision of the theory DEDUCTION o HYPOTHESES/PREDICTIONS OBSERVATION o TEST HYPOTHESES/ PRED. o DATA GATHERING o STAT ANALYSIS INDUCTION o REVISION OF THEORY EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEHAVIOR Controlled experimental designs- laboratory setting Two kinds of variables a. Independent - individually manipulated or carefully regulated by the experimenter other aspects are constant b. Dependent- outcome responses, values of which depnde on how one I.V affect the participants OUTCOMES when the experimenter manipulates I.V, they control for the effect of the irrelevant variables and observe the effects on the D.V CONTROL VARIABLES irrelevant variables held constant CONFOUNDING VAR. type of irrelevant var. that has been left uncontrolled in the study ex: time of day (refer to p. 20 *print out) TWO COMMON DEPENDENT VARABLES: 1. PERCENT CORRECT (additive inverse, error rate) 2. REACTION TIME - uses subtraction method a. Subtraction Method - estimating the time a cognitive process takes by subtracting amount of the information processing takes with the process from the time it takes without the process *Researcher investigates how many items the participant can answer correctly, or how long *Can tell investogator, respectively, the accuracy and speed of mental processing CORRELATION CHART Negative (upper left to lower right- descending) Zero Positive (lower left to upper right-ascending) *ranges from -1 to 0 to 1 NEUROSCIENTIFIC RESEARCH investigators study the relationship between cogni performance and cerebral events and structures Categories of the techniques used in neuroscientific research 1. Studying individual's brain ppostmortem(after death), relate to individual's cognitive function before death to observable features of the brain 2. sudy images showing structures of or activities in the brain of an indiv. who is known to have a particular cognitive deficit 3. obtaining info about cerebral processes during normal performance of a cognitive activity POSTMORTEM STUDIES offered some of the first insights into how specific lesions (areas of injury in the brain) may be assoc. with particular cogni deficits continue to provide useful insights into how the brain influeces cogni function STUDYING NORMAL COGN FUNCTIONING cerebral activity in animal subjects researchers use animals as subjecs involving neurosurgical procedures that cannot be performed on humans becuase uch procedures would be difficult, nethical, or impractical OTHER METHODS used to obtain richly textured info about prticular indiv. think in a broad range of contexts: 1. SELF-REPORTS - an indiv's own acct. of cogni processes 2. CASE STUDIES- in-depth studies of indiv. 3. NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION - detaled studies of cogni performance in everyday situations and non laboratory contexts 4. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH - test hypotheses 5. SELF-REPORTS, CASE SUDIES ANDNATURALISTIC OBSERVATION- useful for formulation of hypotheses TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - a condition that cannot be manipulated in humans in the lab when traumatic brain injury occurs, case studies are the onl way to gather info VERBAL PROTOCOL- used in studying complex cogni processes, such as proble solving decision making participants describe aloud all their thoughts and ideas during the performance of a given cogni task ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY - findings in one environmental context may be considered relevant outside of that context ECOLOGY - stuudy of the interactive re;ationship between an organism and its envi COMPUTER SIMULATIONS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIGITAL INFLUENCE OF COMPUTER; 1. Indirect - models of human cognition based on models of how compters process info 2. Direct - computer simulations and AI COMPUTER SIMULATIONS- research program computers to imitate a given human function or process BRUTE FORCE - researcehr constrict algorithm that considers extremely large numbers of moves in a very shot period of time COGNITIVE SCIENCE- cross-disciplinary filed that uses ideas and methods from cogni psych, cogni neuroscience, AI, philosophy, linguistics and anthropology OTHER COLLABS: SOCIAL PSYCH- motivation and emotion ENGINEERING PSYH- human-machine interactions CLINICAL PSYCH- psychological disorders PSYCHIATRIST - how brain works and how it influeces our thinking, feeling, reasoning ANTHROPOLOGISTS- explore how reasoning and perception process differ COMPUTER SPECIALISTS- develop computer interfaces that are highlyefficient TRAFFIC PLANNERS- plan and construct traffic situations that result in maximal overview for trafffic through cogni psych FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS IN COGNI PSYCH 1. Empirical data and theories are both important; data in cogni psych can only be fully understood in context of an explanatory theory; theories are empty without empirical data 2. Cognition is generally adaptive but not in all specific instances 3. Cogni processes interact with e/o and w/ noncogni processes 4. needs to be sudied through variety of scientific methods 5. all basic research in cogni psych may lead to applications, and all applied research may leas to basic understandings KEY THEMES: 1. NATURE VS NATURE explore how covariations and interactions in the envi adversely affec someone whose genes otherwise might have led to success in a variety of tasks 2. RATIONALISM VS EMPIRICISM Combine theory with empirical methods to learn the most we can about cogni phenomena 3. STRUCTURES VS PROCESS instead of focusing solely on the study of the contents or of th processes of the mind; explore how mental process operate on mental structures 4. DOMAIN GENERALITY VS DOMAIN SPECIFICITY explore which mightbe domain general and which might be domain spec. 5. VALIDITY OF CASUAL INFERENCES VS ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY combne variety of methods, (lab and moore naturalistic ones) to converge on findings that hold up, regardless of method 6. APPLIED VS BASIC RESEARCH combine 2 kinds of research so that basic research eads to applied research, which leads to further basic research 7. BIOLOGICAL VS BEHAVIORAL METHODS synthesize biological and bahvioral methods so that we understand cogni phnomena at multiple levels of analysis