Singapore’s Security - Crisis Management What are some examples of Singapore dealing with crises? It is a known fact that Singapore has good crisis management. Singapore had been able to get through many different crises and most recently, Singapore had to overcome the Covid-19 crisis. Before the virus even hit Singapore, Singapore already had a pandemic response plan that was developed back from the 2003 SARS outbreak. This meant that Singapore had experience in preventing a virus outbreak and as such, Singapore was well prepared. For example, testing regimes were up and running by the time the first case was confirmed on January 23. Labs were in place for the first case of coronavirus, such that soon after the first case, every lab in every public hospital laboratory was capable of doing tests. These meant that Singapore wasted no time in their battle against the battle of the virus, helping control it. Furthermore, a network of health clinics with expertise in treating respiratory illnesses were set up early such that by mid-February, about 900 clinics were in operation. These clinics act as the first point of contact for people with flu-like symptoms, taking the pressure off the hospitals and stopping them from becoming a source of infection themselves. Contact tracing, where once a person has tested positive, health ministry workers begin detailed tracking of that person's recent movements; where they have been and who they have come into contact with. The officials then track down the people who have had contact with the infected person and are referred to early medical assessment. This allows for the identification of the contacts of a case early on before they developed symptoms, hence breaking the chain of transmission. However, contact tracing led to people being worried that there is an imposition on civil liberties and worry about the uses that governments might put that to. This was then soon addressed by the government. Singapore also had to deal with the 2008 financial crisis. Headlined by the collapse of American investment bank Lehman Brothers in September 2008. By the third quarter of 2008, the banking crisis in the United States (US) and its ripple effects had greatly stressed the Singapore economy, causing it to be the first country in East Asia to succumb to recession. It was hailed as Singapore’s worst ever recession. To help Singapore businesses and workers cope with the economic downturn, the government pledged S$2.9 billion in November 2008 and a further S$20.5 billion Resilience Package(focus is on keeping employment levels as high as possible while minimizing business failures) in January 2009. How well did Singapore fare in these episodes? Singapore has a relatively low number of coronavirus cases(59869) and many were discharged (59,731). Furthermore, there was a low number of deaths(29). As such, Singapore did well against the virus. The Singapore economy weathered the financial storm better than feared with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announcing in August 2009 that “the worst is over for the Singapore economy” and that “the eye of the storm has passed”. In November, the Ministry of Trade and Industry declared that the recession was effectively over and projected a growth forecast of between three and five percent in 2010. The economic figures achieved in 2010 defied gloomy predictions made the year before when the recession was in full steam. Social Harmony What are some major threats to Singapore’s social harmony, and how are they managed? Some of the major threats to Singapore’s social harmony are the resurgence of identity politics worldwide which rejects diversity and co-existence with others; the Internet allowing hate speech and incitement to spread further and faster; and religiously motivated terrorist groups continuing to sow discord. Firstly, online falsehoods, if left unchecked, have the potential to chip away at, destabilize and ultimately destroy the social harmony Singapore has painstakingly nurtured over the past few decades, particularly between different races and religions. Dr Mathews, a researcher into issues related to social cohesion, made this point in his written and oral representations to the Select Committee tasked to look into the problem of deliberate online falsehoods. Citing research and surveys, Dr Mathews explained that the existence of harmonious relationships between the different communities in Singapore does not mean that there are no misperceptions or prejudices about different groups in the population. Society, he said, is still not race-blind, and differences still matter in how people perceive and interact with each other at the workplace, and in social settings. He cited a local example of how a website The Real Singapore had spread a story about a Filipino family complaining about Singaporeans who played music loudly during the Thaipusam religious festival. “I personally witnessed just how quickly netizens took to this story and without questioning the veracity of facts, made comments maligning Filipinos,” he said in his written representation. One of the ways that the government has chosen to manage this is the introduction of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, also known as POFMA. POFMA seeks to prevent the electronic communication of falsehoods as well as to safeguard against the use of online platforms for the communication of such falsehoods. It also puts in place various measures to counteract the effects of such communication and to prevent the misuse of online accounts and bots Do you think these management strategies are effective? Without intervention, these falsehoods could have spread unchecked, caused public panic and reduced public confidence in Singapore’s efforts to combat COVID-19 The use of POFMA clarified the facts quickly and required corrections to be placed alongside the posts at their source, for example, on intermediary platforms like Facebook and HardwareZone. On the other hand, it is true that POFMA hands the government a disproportionate amount of power, with little accountability about what is or isn’t deemed “in the public interest” to take action on. The threshold for intervention remains very low, without any need to demonstrate clear incitement to harm or violence before a government minister issues orders under the law. People also question whether fake news can be rectified via other means unlike POFMA which could potentially defund platforms or lead to excessive censorship. There are also platforms whereby POFMA is unable to take effect, for example the closed or encrypted chat apps like WhatsApp. There’s little the government can do to address the endlessly forwarded messages in our family chat groups. National service What is the justification for national service? The need for National Service (NS) became clear when Singapore gained independence in 1965 looking back at how easily the japanese conquered our tiny island nation. It was first instituted in 1967 to help build Singapore's military forces soon after its independence. However, It would not have been possible to raise a regular force of a sufficient size to protect this island state given our small population.Therefore, for over 50 years, NS has evolved into a national institution that is well accepted and a part of our way of life. As the bedrock of our fighting force and national security, NS remains critical for Singapore’s continued survival and success. A strong defence underpins the peace and prosperity we enjoy by safeguarding Singapore’s independence and sovereignty How has NS evolved? An ns servicemen’s roles have also expanded. Beyond protecting Singapore from armed conflicts, our servicemen are now involved in countering terrorism, dealing with the aftermath of natural disasters and tackling health epidemics. In 1975, the first intake of Police full-time National Servicemen was enlisted and deployed for peacetime and emergency functions. The SCDF enlisted its first intake of NSFs in 1981 to provide emergency services to the nation during peacetime and crises. Today, the changing roles of our servicemen reflect the need for NS to evolve and keep pace with the changes in our society as well as our threat environment. What are some of the recent debates surrounding National Service (e.g. training safety issues, perceived unequal opportunities for Muslims, etc.)? The accident that led to NS reservist and actor Aloysius Pang’s death was the result of safety lapses by Pang and the other personnel who were with him in a Singapore Self-Propelled Howitzer (SSPH) at the time, a committee of inquiry (COI) has determined. Pang was crushed by the gun barrel of the SSPH that he was working in, during Exercise Thunder Warrior at Waiouru Training Area in New Zealand. He died of his injuries days later. Another less known case, was when a Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) officer was charged on Friday (Oct 25) in relation to the death last year of full-time national serviceman (NSF) Liu Kai, who was driving a Land Rover commanded by him. Regular serviceman Ong Lin Jie, 28, a captain, was charged with doing a rash act causing death. Court documents say he had allegedly failed to keep a safety distance of 30m between the Land Rover and a Bionix Infantry Fighting Vehicle, which had reversed and mounted the driver's side of the Land Rover during a training exercise at Murai Urban Training Facility on Nov 3. Corporal First Class (CFC) Liu, 22, a transport operator from SAF's Transport Hub West, died after the Land Rover he was driving was mounted by the Bionix despite repeated commands by the rear guide to stop the Bionix. Emerging threats to national security What are some recent cases of extremism and self-radicalisation in Singapore and how is Singapore countering these threats? Have they been effective? A 16-year-old Singaporean had hatched a plan to attack the Assyafaah Mosque along Admiralty Lane and Yusof Ishak Mosque in Woodlands on March 15 with a machete. The date is the second anniversary of when Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant livestreamed the massacre of more than 50 Muslims at mosques in the New Zealand city of Christchurch. In giving more details of the case on Wednesday night, ISD said that it was online exposure to extremist materials that contributed to his self-radicalisation. The 16-year-old S’porean who made ‘detailed plans’ to attack 2 mosques in Woodlands detained under ISAHe was influenced by Tarrant’s livestream video of an attack at a mosque in Christchurch and his manifesto, as well as propaganda videos put out by terrorist group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The teenager was arrested in November last year and detained under the Internal Security Act. On his rehabilitation, ISD said: “As with other terrorism-related youth cases dealt with under the Internal Security Act in recent years, a mentor will be assigned to him, to motivate him to focus on his rehabilitation, studies and family, and guide him towards pro-social behaviours.” What is the Internal Security Act? The Internal Security Act of Singapore is a statute that grants the executive power to enforce preventive detention, prevent subversion, suppress organized violence against persons and property, and do other things incidental to the internal security of Singapore. Effective? Between January and March 2019, one Singaporean was issued with an Order of Detention (OD) under the Internal Security Act (ISA), while another two were issued with Restriction Orders (RO) under the ISA for their involvement in terrorism-related conduct. Separately, in March and June 2019, four Singaporeans were released from detention with restrictions, and the RO issued against one Singaporean was allowed to lapse. The four had shown good progress in their rehabilitation and were assessed to no longer pose a security threat that required preventive detention. Abd Rahim’s detention was suspended with a Suspension Direction (SD)[1] in March 2019. Asyrani was released on a RO when his OD expired in March 2019, while Izzah and Khairul were released on ROs when their ODs expired in June 2019. What are some recent cases of fake news and how is Singapore countering this threat? Have they been effective? 6 in 10 of the participants in a local study have received fake news about COVID-19 on social media. Social media was cited as the preferred source of information on the outbreak for the public, and the most prevalent channels used to share COVID-19 information are messaging platforms, which include WhatsApp, Telegram and Facebook Messenger. These were some of the findings released on Thursday (May 21) as part of an ongoing study by the National Centre of Infectious Diseases (NCID) on the Singapore population’s knowledge, risk perception and behaviour during the COVID-19 outbreak. Protection From Online Falsehoods And Manipulation Act (POFMA) What is it? ● Introduced in 2019 in response to surge of fake news ● Under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, correction directions will be issued to party responsible - these directions do not require the online falsehood to be removed but require recipients to post a correction notice and a link to the facts alongside a false statement. In more serious cases, a stop communication or disabling direction may be used. What are some concerns regarding it? One of the key concerns was that it could chill free speech and give too much power to ministers as arbiters of truth. The Workers' Party (WP) had opposed the Bill, arguing that the Executive should not be the first to decide what is false. What did it do? On 26 Jan 2020, a thread on the popular HardwareZone forum popped up with the title: Singapore Reports First Death From New Virus. A 66-year-old man had died after developing severe pneumonia. (First coronavirus death only happened in March). The next day Health Minister Gan Kim Yong issued a general correction order under POFMA to SPH Magazines, which runs HardwareZone.