A+ to B+ Organization Content/Development Style Key words in the CLAIM were also present in the DATA Student wrote a CCDWDWC paragraph The data was relevant to the claim and well-chosen as an example. Warrants were clearly and logically tied to the data. Style did EVERYTHING characteristic of the middle-range papers AND ALSO… Demonstrated superior vocabulary and a variety of sentence structures Contained few, if any, errors in GUMS. Student wrote a CCDWDWC paragraph Development was adequate for the assignment and level Data was reasonably relevant to the claim. Warrants made adequate explanation of the data, but could have said more about why or in what way the author was correct. Student had some issues with style, but not significant enough to affect overall meaning. Some issues may have included… One or more fragments or run-ons Use of I or you Over-used pronouns More than one fake question Weak diction Student wrote less than a CCDWDWC paragraph – may only have included one data or one warrant. Student had frequent issues with style, including… Fragments or run-ons Frequent use of I or you Over-used pronouns Several fake questions Weak diction Misunderstood passage Key words or ideas in the claim and data were also in the WARRANT Claim used “because…and also since” and offered TWO DIFFERENT reasons B to C C- to D Key words in the claim were present in the data and warrant, but not as clearly as they needed to have been. Connection between claim, data, and warrant was unclear and seemed random. Student chose not to use “because…and also since” pattern in the claim Student chose not to use key words from the data in the claim and the warrant. Data seemed disconnected or randomly chosen Development was minimal. Student may have forgotten to put “moreover” and give more information. AUTOMATIC REDOS IF… Key words in the claim were not in the data or not in the order promised. Multiple spelling errors, fake questions, sentence errors, and vague pronouns made it challenging to read