Nadeera Galagedarage English 1100-17 Nina Johnson Jan. 23, 2022 Summary of “Shale Gas Revolution” by David Brooks In the article “Shale Gas Revolution” by David Brooks, the author speaks about “Fracking”, a method of extracting natural gas from shale, and possible benefits and limitations associated with it. After it’s discovery by George P. Mitchell, shale gas now occupies almost one third of American natural gas supply compared to 1% in year 2000. U.S. now possesses enough resources to last them a century. Author speaks about the half a million new jobs that were created and potential opportunities in the future. He states that the large availability of natural gas result in lowering electricity prices and furthermore, attracts gas reliant chemical companies to invest in U.S, creating billions of additional revenues. However, author states that some conservative parties and environmentalists oppose to shale gas and as it has impacted the demand for coal industry too, several parties have joined together to prevent investigation of new gas. He concedes that fracking carries the risk of water pollution through the chemicals used for drilling, however, citing the study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology he believes that the risk can be mitigated through introducing a sound legal framework for the companies engaged in fracking. David concludes that, the industry has become a point for political debates between the parties, rather than finding a solution for the problems and reaping the benefits with the general public being uninterested as a whole. (238- 240). Nadeera Galagedarage English 1100-17 Nina Johnson Jan. 23, 2022 Summary of “Safety First, Fracking Second”, Scientific American In the article “Safety First, Fracking Second” in Scientific American on October 19,2011, the author emphasizes on the lack of research into water contamination through “fracking” and inadequate regulations in place to govern the natural gas industry. The author states that shale gas supply has increased by “30%” within the last decade, which is beneficial in terms of national energy and environmental wise, however, drinking water pollution by chemicals used in the fracking process and resultant methane gas has created a fear among the general public. He points out to a study published by Duke University, where they found high levels of methane gas in wells situated within close proximity to fracking sites. The author believes fracking should be limited by the states until proper research is carried out on water pollution issue. He expects new regulations to be issued by The State Department of Environment Conservation by the end of the year. He states existing state regulations are inadequate and emphasizes the need of a common standard for the gas industry. The decision of the congress to exempt fracking from regulation under “Safe Drinking Water Act” is seen as a shortcoming by the author. Quoting an article, “The truth about Fracking”, by Cris Mooney, writer lists out steps to be taken as preventative measures for water pollution, such as, Inspection of well casings, storage of toxic fluid in tanks, inspection of leakages from residents’ faucets and finally testing water before and after chemical levels of fracking to monitor changes. (240- 242).
