Lesson 3.3 Curriculum Mapping and Curriculum Quality Audit Daisybel Tura CURRICULUM MAPPING DEFINITION A model for designing, refining, upgrading and reviewing the curriculum resulting in a framework that provides form, focus, and function (Hale & Dunlap, 2010 Reflective process that helps teachers understand what has been taught in class, how it has been taught and how learning outcomes are assessed An ongoing process or “work-in-progress” Not a one time initiative but a continuing action, which involves the teacher and other stakeholders, who have common concerns Can be done by teachers alone, a group of teachers teaching the same subject, the department, the whole school or district or the whole educational system. BENEFITS Ensures alignment of the desired learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment of learning Addresses the gaps or repetitions in the curriculum. It reveals if certain program goals or learning outcomes are not adequately covered or overly emphasized in the current curriculum Verifies, clarifies and establishes alignment between what students do in their courses and what is taught in the classrooms and assessed as their learning Visually show important elements of the curriculum and how they contribute to student learning Connects all initiatives from instruction, pedagogies, assessment and professional development. It facilitates the integration of cross-curricular skills. CURRICULUM MAPPING Questions to consider in mapping curriculum What do my students learn? What do they study in the first quarter? What are they studying in the school throughout the year? Do my co-teachers who handle the same subject, cover the same content? Achieve the same outcomes? Use similar strategies? How do I help my students understand the connections between my subjects and other subjects within the year? Next year? CURRICULUM MAPPING PROCESS Steps to Follow For a Degree Program in College OBE – Inspired Syllabus for Higher Education 1. Make a matrix or a spread sheet 1. Make a matrix or a spreadsheet 2. Place a timeline that you need to cover (one quarter, one semester, one year). This should be dependent on time frame of a particular curriculum that was written 2. Identify the degree or program outcomes (ex.BEEd, or BSEd) 3. Identify the subjects or courses under the degree (GenEd, Prof Ed, and Major for BSEd) 4. List the subjects along the vertical cells of the matrix in a logical or chronological order 3. Enter the intended learning outcomes, skills needed to be taught or achieved at the end of the teaching 4. Enter in the same matrix the areas/subject areas to be covered content 5. 5. Align and name each resource available such as textbooks, workbooks, module next to subject areas List the degree program outcomes along the horizontal cell (use code as PO1, PO2,… if outcomes are too long to fit in the cell) PO means Program Outcomes 6. Cross the Subject determine if such outcomes as either or give Opportunity corresponding cell 7. Fill up all cells 8. After accomplishing the map, use it as a guide for all teachers teaching the course for students to complete the degree in four years. 6. Enter the teaching-learning methods to be used to achieve the outcomes 7. Align and enter the assessment procedure and tools to the intended learning outcomes, content areas, and resources 8. Circulate the map among based all involved personnel for their inputs 9. Revise and refine map based on suggestions and distribute to all concerned and the Outcomes, and subject accomplishes the Learned (L), Performed (P) (O). Place the code in the Sample Curriculum Map Excerpt form the DepEd Curriculum Guide for JHS TLE Sample Curriculum Map Excerpt from CMO No. 79, 2017 CURRICULUM MAPPING DEFINITION A form of curriculum mapping A process of mapping the curricular program or syllabus against established standards. Supported by Susan Rafe when she said that the best practice in curriculum development and implementation require that discipline based standards embody curricular and program scopes and sequences (Arafeh, 2016,p.585) Requires a written curriculum and the tested curriculum linked to both the taught and the written curricula BENEFITS Identify gaps, under and overrepresentation of the curriculum based on the standards Ensures alignment of learning outcomes, activities and assessment to the standards Achieve an internationally comparable curriculum as standards become the basis of the curriculum analysis CURRICULUM Quality Audit Questions to consider in engaging curriculum quality Is the curriculum planned, executed, and assessed in accordance with appropriate standards? How does the school system conform to the standards of quality in instructional organization like specificity, quality and scope for teaching, learning and assessment? Are all students achieving success equally and effectively? If not, what can be done about it? STANDARDS THAT CAN BE USED IN CURRICULUM Quality Audit Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) can be used as anchor in curriculum quality audit. It aims to set clear expectations of teachers along well-defined career stages of professional development from beginning to distinguished practice. It is adopted and implemented through Department of Education Order (DO) 42, s. 2017. Teacher educator, program heads, curriculum planners may refer to the PPST to “quality audit” the pre-service teacher education curriculum as basis for quality assurance provision of teacher education. First CQA in teacher education curriculum in the Philippines: 1. Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) 2. Philippine Normal University 3. Cebu Normal University 4. West Visayan University 5. West Mindanao State University 6. other member universities of the National Network of Normal Schools (3Ns) Using the CQA, pre service syllabi were mapped to the PPST to ensure the standards for beginning teachers are addressed in the pre-service curriculum. This embody the competencies of beginning teachers as they practice their profession in the DepEd. STANDARDS THAT CAN BE USED IN CURRICULUM Quality Audit CHED CMOs 74 to 83 , standards set by the Commission on Higher Education, specific to the degree program being offered and the teachers who are the outcomes of the programs. They have both the generic standards for all teacher education degree programs and specific standards for each degree program. For example, CMO 74, s. 2017 contains the standards for BEEd and CMO 75, s. 2017 contains the BSEd. Competency Framework for Teachers in Southeast Asia (CFT-SEA) SEAMEO and SEAMES and the European Tuning Asia Southeast (TASE) teacher competencies, international standards for teachers.