Uploaded by upasanapuri2020

JSNA

advertisement
Page:of 17
8
Skin Cancer
Skin serv
ices have been peer reviewed and Trusts and the network are producing action
plans to ensure compliance with the IOG and to meet peer review requirements.
Brain and Central Nervous System
The National Cancer Action have tasked each MDT to update MDT activi
ty and
workforce against
the IOG for submission by the
February 2010
S
upportive and Palliative Car
e
A final
Stock take
is currently being undert
aken for submission to NCAT
by March
2010.
The Cancer Action Team along with an SHA lead will be visiting networ
ks in 2010 to
offer further support.
The Network along with the majority of other networks will be red lighted
on
psychological care and rehabilitation where further work and investment is still needed.
3.
What is this telling us?
L
ocal
V
iews
The South
East London Cancer Network model for user partnership was established in
2005
.
A
revised South
East London Cancer Network (SELCN) user partnership strategy
(2008
2012) has been developed building on the work of the previous strategy.
The overall aim of
this strategy is to embed user partnership working and user
involvement in policy development, service planning and service delivery of high quality,
user
centered
cancer services in SELCN.
In addition to this overarching framework there is current activ
e user involvement in
many but not all of the tumour working groups, supportive care groups and generic
working groups. Users are also involved in one
off projects, focus groups and in peer
review.
NHS Lewisham has been recently
recognized
by the DH and
NHS London for the wo
rk
carried out through the Pace
setters programme, working with local women from Black
and minority ethnic communities to promote attenda
n
ce for breast screening.
The Healthy Communities Collaborative Cancer Project works with a team
of lay
volunteers to
organise and facilitate cancer awareness workshops, presentations,
festival or group meetings
,w
hich attract a diverse population in terms of age and
ethnicity.
Interim results from a Cancer Awareness Survey carried out in a neighbou
ring borough
in South East London with a similar population profile to Lewisham found that there was:

Low knowledge of “persistent cough and hoarseness” and “sore that does not
heal” as warning signs of cancer

Knowledge of warning signs for cancer lower
among non
white and
economically inactive people

Low knowledge of HPV, low intake of fruit and vegetables and low physical
activity as risk factors for cancer

Underestimation of personal risk of cancer

Low knowledge of frequency of bowel cancer

Low knowle
dge of frequency of lung cancer in women

Low knowledge of existence of bowel screening programme
9

Lower knowledge of existence of NHS screening programmes in people who
are non
white, economically inactive and living in poorer areas. Also
particularly low f
or the Black African subgroup.
National and Local Strategies
The
Cancer Reform Strategy
, published in 2007, builds on the progress made since the
publication of
Cancer Plan
(2000) and strives to close the gap in cancer outcomes
between the UK and the r
est of Western Europe. The key aims are to
:

Prevent cancer by tackling the lifestyle factors that increase the risk of
developing the disease
.

Diagnose cancer earlier by increasing coverage of cancer screening and
increasing awareness of cancer symptoms
.

Ensure that patients have access to high quality cancer care
.

Support and empowering patients through their ‘cancer journey’

Reduce inequalities in cancer incidence, mortality and access to care
.

Bring cancer care closer to home where appropriate
.
Healthc
are for London: A Framework for Action
was published in July 2007. Led by
Professor Lord Darzi it made a compelling case for change in health and healthcare
services across London.
To support the implementation of this policy in cancer services
a “Case for
Change” was published in March 2010 which provided a set of arguments for
the need to improve cancer services in London. This has been followed by the
publication
of a
Model of C
are for London cancer services.
The South E
ast London
Cancer N
etwork
has de
vel
oped its strategic vision covering all
aspects of cancer services
prevention,
screening, diagnosis, treatment (
s
urgery,
radiotherap
y and systemic
therap
y)
and
suppo
rtive palliative
care which has
been
published is Collaborative
Commissioning Initiative
s 2008
09 to 2010
0
13.
NHS Lewisham’s Commissioning
Strategy Plan (2009
2015) “Improving Health and
Well
being” has Reducing Premature Mortality from Cancer as one of its seven strategic
goals.
Current
Activity and S
ervices
Primary
P
revention
Preven
tion remains the best form of tackling cancer, reducing the human suffering
caused by the disease and improving outcomes. There is also a strong economic case
for investing more in prevention, therefore reducing the pressure on services in the long
term.
Reducing smoking prevalence
Smoking is the single largest preventable risk factor for cancer.
The key actions of
the Lewisham Tobacco Control P
lan are:

Reducing availability to children
vending machines/ supply of tobacco to minors
10

Reducing attractiven
ess of tobacco products
removal of display/ reducing
promotion/ limiting exposure to tobacco use in media/ reducing promot
ion
through tobacco accessories

Taking action on illicit toba
cco

Counterfeit Tobacco Seizures

NHS intervention
Stop Smoking
services

Smoking and
Pregnancy.
Healthier nutrition /
increasing
physical activity
The evidence linking poor diet and obesity to cancer has
become much stronger. In
Lewisham there is a Prom
oting Health Wei
ght for Lewisham Children, Young People
and their F
amilies Strategy
and an
action plan
.
The action plan
includes the following:

Promotion of Healthy Weight for all children, including
measuring
of children
in R
and year 6,
linking with scho
ols nurses, Maternity, Early years, schools (linking
with Healthy Schools)

Leisure Sports and Environment
including the promotion of free swimming, and
the adoption of Change for Life to promot
e local activities and projects
, the
development of a Physica
l Activity Strategy and action plan in 2010.

Lewisham Food Strategy, which includes improving food access through the
development of Food Co
ops, food growing through Community gardens and
allotments , Schools Food Policy and Schools meals

Workforce train
ing
and communications

Development of target
ed and specialist
weight management services
for children
a
nd adults
.
Alcohol
Excessive alcohol consumption is strongly linked to an incre
ased risk of several cancers.
Lewisham
has published an
Alcohol Strategy
2009
2012. The strategy
aim
s
to promote
sensible drinking and to reduce the impact of alcohol misuse
. Priorities for the coming
year include the revision and development of the Council and PCT’s workplace alcohol
polices, to run seasonal campaigns, to c
ontinue and develop the primary care based
Directed and Local Enhanced Services and to develop an alcohol prevention pathway
as part of the Health Checks programme.
Skin Campaign
The skin campaign was launched in April 2009 and ran until September
2009
across
the
six boroughs covered by the South East London Cancer Network. The campaign used
innovative evidence
based social marketing techniques to produce measured behaviour
change amongst residents, who are most at risk of skin
cancer. Three
‘behavioura
l’
groups were targeted using a range of communication channels including a bespoke
website, nightclub posters and on
the
ground engagement, supplemented with an
education programme.
The budget for the research and campaign implementation was jointly fun
ded by the
South East London Cancer Network (SELCN) and six PCTs. The results showed that
22% of South East London residents had remembered seeing the campaign, and of
those who had seen it 36% said they had taken action as a result, including checking
the
ir skin more often and using higher level sun
protection.
11
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination for cervical cancer
Vaccination now presents a further opportunity in cancer prevention, specifically for
cervical cancer. The government has introduced a n
ational vaccination programme for
young girls against the human papillomavirus. This will protect against the strains of the
virus which cause around seven out of ten cases of cervical cancer.
In the academic
year 2008
09 Lewisham achieved an uptake of 72.
6%, lower than the national target of
80%.
Increasing awareness and earlier presentation
Healthy Communities Collaborative Cancer project
A two
year community
based cancer ini
tiative was launched i
n
Lewisham
September
2008
and completed in September 2010
The Healthy Communities Collabor
ative aimed
to raise awareness and promote the earlier presentation of cancer symptoms.
The
project was
focusing on three wards
in Lewisham that
have
high
deprivation with
, high
mortality
and poor survival rates
for
cancer
. These are Evelyn
, New Cross and
Bellingham
and it
included
working with fourteen general practices
in these wards.
The
focus was
on breast, bowel and lung cancer.
Earlier diagnosis
Increasing the coverage/uptake of cancer screening
A key objective
for NHS
Lewisham and partners in reducing health inequalities is to
improve
cervical
,
breast
and bowel screening uptake. Central to this is the involvement
of primary care to promote screening. A specification for cancer screening and primary
care is bei
ng developed.
Health Equity Audits are currently being carried out on the
breast and cervical screening progrmammes to assess issues of access.
Cervical cancer screening
Uptake rates for cervical screening will be
analyzed
by practice and poor perfor
ming
practices will be targeted with support and best
practice
shared.
Breast Screening
A breast screening action plan has been developed and submitted to the
London
S
trategic
H
ealth
A
uthority
. Key actions to implement this include
,v
alidation of
pract
ice
lists,
supporting and
involving primary
care
to promote breast cancer screening
and
aw
a
ren
e
ss
r
a
ising
and health promotion activities
to women in the community.
Bowel cancer
A health promotion specialist has been
appointed in South East London by t
he Bowel
Cancer Screening Programme to promote bowel cancer screening, to work closely with
Primary Care Services and to develop strategies to increase the uptake rate
.
Southwark
PCT has developed a ‘bowel screening action pack’ to raise awareness of the
p
rogramme among GP practices
which will be promoted in Lewisham
.
Training and
health promotion sessions
have been and will continue to be carried out for health and
social care professionals and a wide rang
e
of
community
and voluntary
groups
in
Lewisham.
An application for NAEDI funding
for South E
ast London sector to develop
an integrated
programme of
awareness raising of bowel cancer symptoms and the screening
programme
was
submitted
at end of April 2010
and was successful. A campaign to raise
12
awareness
of bowel cancer signs and symptoms in the members of the community most
at risk and in selected GPs practices is being planned for summer of 2011.
Secondary and tertiary care services
NHS
Lewisham
commissions for its patients
access
to a
comprehensive
range of
diagnostic and treatment services for cancer,
including
tertiary care, primarily provided in
the SELCN area
.
SELCN Strategic Commissioning Priorities
for
2009
2013

Bring cancer mortality in
line with National target of 20
% reduction over 10 year
s.

Increase levels of awareness of cancer and causes
.

Improve continuously towards meeting National Targets and increase coverage.
Breast
70% Minimum
80% Target. Cervical
80
%
.
Reduce
Delays in reporting
cervical cancer to 2 weeks. Implement Bow
el Cancer Screening programme
including age extension.

Undertake National Audit in Primary Care for all newly diagnosed patients with
cancer.

Implement National Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Guidance to improve
access to treatment
.

Reduce inpatient be
d days for cancer patients and increase ambulatory care.

Reconfigure services in South London Healthcare, UHL and AHSC to deliver
safe services locally where possible and centralise where necessary.

Establish clear
arrangements for the commissioning
and provision of NICE
approved drugs.

Transform the Cancer Network management into clearly focused support for
commissioning.
.
What is this telling us?
What are the key inequalities?
There is now a
range of evidence about the nature and extent of inequalities which occur
in cancer, including:

Cancer incidence and mortality are generally higher in deprived groups
compared with affluent groups, older compared with younger people and men
compared with w
omen. Conversely, breast cancer has higher incidence in more
affluent groups, but mortality is actually higher in less affluent women. The
picture for ethnic minority groups varies according to cancer type and ethnic
group. In general, incidence is lower a
mongst ethnic minority groups, although
there are some important exceptions (incidence of prostate cancer is greater
amongst Black African and Black African
Caribbean men, liver cancer in South
Asians, and mouth cancer in Bangladeshis);

Levels of public aw
areness of cancer signs and symptoms are generally low, but
even lower in some groups, such as deprived communities, some BME groups
and men. This may contribute to lower uptake of screening and later presentation
when symptoms arise;

Lifestyle factors (s
uch as smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption and physical
inactivity) almost certainly account for most of the variance in cancer incidence
between the most and least deprived;

Poorer experience of care is reported by black and minority ethnic groups, men
with prostate cancer, and people living in London;

Part of the variance in mortality rates can be attributed to delayed diagnosis
amongst deprived groups, older people (at least for breast cancer) and certain
13
BME groups (at least for breast cancer). The co
ntribution of delayed diagnosis to
poorer survival rates and higher mortality amongst men th
an women is still
uncertain;

Improvements in mortality have been slower in older people than in younger
people. Older people with cancer receive less intensive tre
atment than younger
people. In many cases this may be clinically appropriate. However, there is
increasing evidence that under
treatment of older people
may occur.
Cancer mortality is the third major contributor for both men and women to the gap in life
e
xpectancy between Lewisham and England. Circulatory disease fo
llowed by respiratory
disease are
the first and second contributors respectively. In 2006
08
c
ancer
mortality
accounted
for
19% of the gap in male life expectancy in Lewisham compared to England
and 13% of the gap in female life expectancy in Lewisham compared to England.
In Lewisham lung cancer deaths for
both men and women is the major contributor to the
“cancer”
gap.
Table 8:
Causes of death from cancer and their contribution to the gap in
life
expectancy between Lewisham and England 2006
08
Men
Women
Oesophageal
cancer
4.4%
2.3
%
Stomach cancer
2.2
%
1.5%
Colorectal cancer
..
0.5
%
Lung cancer
8.3
%
8.2
%
Breast cancer
..
..
Other cancers
4.5%
..
Source:http://www.lho.org.uk
Age
spec
ific Death Rates from Cancer
The following tables and charts show age
specific death rates per 100,000 people for
males and females separately, during the period 2005
7, for Lewisham, with
comparative data for England, London overall, and the ONS London Co
smopolitan
comparator group
1
. The charts use a logarithmic scale for ease of readability.
Figure 2:
Age
specific death rates
per 100,000
, cancer, Males 2005
7
Age Specific Death Rates 2005-7, Cancer, Males
1
10
100
1000
10000
1-4
5-14
15-34
35-64
65-74
75+
age-band
Deaths/100,000 males
ENGLAND
LONDON
LONDON COSMOPOLITAN
Lewisham LB
Source:
NCHOD
1
Source: NCHOD Compendium of Public Health Indicators
14
Figure 3:
Age
specific death rates, cancer, Females 2005
7
Age Specific Death Rates 2005-7, Cancer, Females
1
10
100
1000
10000
1-4
5-14
15-34
35-64
65-74
75+
age-band
Deaths/100,000 females
ENGLAND
LONDON
LONDON COSMOPOLITAN
Lewisham LB
Source:
LHO
The f
ollowing observations can be made:
Lewisham’s cancer death rate for pre
school age boys is around three times
as high as the England and London rates. This may be a statistical “blip”, as
absolute numbers (which are not included in the source data) are v
ery small.
Lewisham’s rates in school
age children are low for both sexes (again,
absolute values will be low).
Lewisham death rates from cancer in younger working
age people of both
sexes are less than half the national rates.
Lewisham’s cancer death rate
s in older working age people of both sexes are
below national rates, and closely comparable to the other comparators.
In males aged 65
74, Lewisham’s cancer death rates are 29% higher than
England’s.
In males aged over 75 and over, Lewisham’s death rate f
rom cancer are 6%
higher than the national rate.
In females age 65
74, Lewisham’s death rate from cancer is 12% higher than
England’s.
In females aged 75 and over, Lewisham’s death rate from cancer is 3%
higher than the national rate.
Deprivation
There a
re significant inequalities in cancer mortality within Lewisham.
Bellingham and
New Cross
wards
have the highest mortality rates for 2003
07. These wards
are the
second and fourth most deprived in the Borough respectively.
15
Figure 4:
Standardised Mortalit
y Ratios for Cancer, Lewisham Wards, Aged <75,
2003
2007
Mortality from all cancers: persons, less than 75 years, indirectly standardised
ratios (SMR, 100 = England) with 95% confidence intervals by ward, 5 year
average, 2003-07
50
70
90
110
130
150
170
190
210
230
Bellingham
Blackheath
Brockley
Catford South
Crofton Park
Downham
Evelyn
Forest Hill
Grove Park
Ladywell
Lee Green
Lewisham Central
New Cross
Perry Vale
Rushey Green
Sydenham
Telegraph Hill
Whitefoot
SMR (100 = England)
Source:
LHO
What are the key gaps in knowledge/services?


Further detailed information analysis to understand the excess cancer mortality in
older people in Lewisham compared to England.

Further
detailed analysis to understand
1
–
year survival for colon cancer.

Roll out the learning from the HCC cancer project across Lewisham practices.

Effective interventions to increase uptake of screening services
and awareness
of symptoms and signs
of canc
er
in
the population as a whole and in
specific
population
groups
.

The need to increase the scale of primary prevention interventions to
reducing
smoking prevalence, the promotion of healthy eating and physical activity,
promote sensible drinking and to
sustain the skin campaign.
What are the risks of not delivering our targets?
The primary target for cancer is a minimum 20% reduction in cancer mortality by 2010
from the 1995/97 rate and that fewer people will die prematurely from cancer, heart
disease
and stroke before the age of 75. Thus the risks of not delivering in other areas,
such as smoking and physical activity and diet obesity, will have an impact on cancer
outcomes. In particular,


Smoking prevalence remains higher than the national average
–
reflecting
Lewisham’s socioeconomic landscape;


The
socioeconomic and
ethnic
diversity of
Lewisham population
impacts on late
presentation of cancer and uptake of screening programmes. Innovati
ve social
16
marketing combined with community engagement approaches are required
otherwise this will impact on early diagnosis;
Is what we are doing working?
Deaths from cancer are affected by a wide range of factors
including all aspects of
cancer care;
prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
Considerab
le
progress
has been made both nationally and locally. There has been a decline in cancer mortality
both nationally and locally
, nationally cancer survival rates for breast, colon, rectum and
pro
s
t
ate cancer has improved since 2000.
The HPV vaccination programme has been
implemented. The bowel cancer screening programme has been rolled out
.
Lewisham
NHS successfully complied with the original waiting standards and is making good
progress with th
e
extended
waiting time standards.
What is coming on the horizon?
Greater demand from health services related to cancer due to

Improved
detection
through screening programmes, which will increase
screening activity and the proportion of cancers requ
iring active, curative and
intensive treatment.

Increased demand for
adjuvant
therapy

Improved survival rates will lead to increased workload in monitoring and
treatment of recurrence

Increased demand for emotional support.
Greater focus on Awareness and
early diagnosis requiring the development of skills and
knowledge in primary care.
Shift in the focus of care from a hospital setting to a community based setting
where
appropriate
.
The implementation of the Healthcare for London “Case for change” and
the Cancer
model of care.
What should we be doing next?

Increase the scale of primary prevention interventions to
reducing smoking
prevalence, the promotion of healthy eating and physical activity, promote
sensible
drinking and
to sustain the skin campaig
n.

Role out the learning from the Health Community Collaborative Cancer Project
across Lewisham. There is a need to have a greater focus on raising awareness
and early diagnosis across GP practices in Lewisham. This will require support
and training in pr
imary care.

Consider what are the most effective interventions to promote awareness of
cancer symptoms and the benefits of screening to the diverse populations in
Lewisham.

Negotiate and implement a Cancer screening specification in primary care to
incre
ase the uptake of cancer screening programmes.

Spread best practice in cervical screening across all practices in Lewisham to
reduce variability in coverage.
17

Further analysis to understand excess cancer mortality in older age population
compared to Engl
and and the 1
year colon cancer survival rates.
Download