Uploaded by Fatimazahra

chapter 23

advertisement
Chapter 23
Should Policy
Makers Be
Restrained?
•
•
Given the uncertainties
about the effects of
macroeconomic policies,
would it be better not to
use policy at all?
Can we trust policy makers
to carry out the right policy?
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
Arguments for and against restraints on policy
Arguments for restraints on policy
1. Policy makers may have good intentions, but they end
up doing more harm than good.
2. Policy makers do what is best for themselves, which is
not necessarily what is best for the country.
The argument against a rigid policy rule
• It is not possible to write a policy rule that covers all
possible circumstances.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-1
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-1 | Uncertainty and Policy
How Much Do Macroeconomists Actually Know?
Consider an economy with high unemployment.
Central bank is considering the use of monetary policy to
increase economic activity.
•
•
•
•
Is the current high rate of unemployment a sign that
unemployment is above the natural rate or a sign that the natural
rate has increased?
By how much will the change in money supply decrease the shortterm interest rate?
How long will it take for lower long-term interest rates and higher
stock prices to affect investment and consumption spending?
How will the proposed policy affect expectations of future output
and future interest rates?
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-2
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-1 | Uncertainty and Policy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-3
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-1 | Uncertainty and Policy
Should Uncertainty Lead Policy Makers to Do Less?
A Scenario: The economy is in a recession
What the Bank of Canada knows:
•
•
•
•
Without changes in monetary policy, unemployment
will still be 10.0% next year.
The natural rate of unemployment is 8.0%.
Okun’s law: 1% more output growth for a year leads to
a reduction in the unemployment rate of 0.4%.
If it could achieve 5% more output growth over the
coming year, the unemployment rate would go down to
its natural rate of 8.0%.
οƒ˜ By how much should the Bank of Canada reduce the
interest rate?
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-4
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-1 | Uncertainty and Policy
Average Response to the Models:
•
•
•
A decrease in interest rates of 1% point should
increase GDP by 0.4% points.
To return the unemployment rate to its natural rate in
one year requires 5% more output growth.
To increase real GDP growth by the required 5%
requires a initial 12.5% reduction in the nominal
interest rate.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-5
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-1 | Uncertainty and Policy
•
The proposed policy is an enormous reduction in the
short-term interest rate.
•
Short-term interest rates are between 0 and 2% in
many countries, including Canada.
•
Large reductions in the nominal interest rate
would hit the zero lower bound on nominal
interest rates (liquidity trap).
οƒ˜ Uncertainty reduces the size of policy actions.
οƒ˜ Policy makers should be more cautious.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-6
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
• Macroeconomic policy: a game (strategic
interactions) between players.
• Policy makers and “the economy”.
• What people and firms do depends on what they
expect policy makers to do.
• What policy makers do depends on what is
happening in the economy.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-7
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
Hostage Takings and Negotiations
• Should governments discontinue their
stated policy of “no negotiation” with
plane hijackers?
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-8
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
Inflation and Unemployment Revisited
Recall the relation between inflation and unemployment
𝝅 = 𝝅𝒆 − 𝜢 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏
Suppose the Bank of Canada announces it will follow a
monetary policy consistent with zero inflation.
• Wage setters believe the announcement: 𝝅𝒆 = 𝟎.
The Bank of Canada faces the following relation
𝝅 = −𝜢 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-9
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
𝝅 = −𝜢 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏
οƒ˜ If the Bank of Canada follows its announced policy
of zero inflation, 𝝅 = 𝝅𝒆 = 𝟎, and 𝒖 − 𝒖𝒏 = 0.
οƒ˜ Bank of Canada can actually do even better.
• By accepting just 1% inflation (and α=2.5), the
Bank of Canada can achieve an unemployment
rate of 0.4% point below un.
• The time inconsistency of optimal policy.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-10
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
• Wage setters will notice that the Bank of Canada has
increased money by more than it announced.
• “The economy” will expect positive inflation of 1%.
• If the BofC still wants to achieve an unemployment rate 0.4%
point below the natural rate, it now has to accept π = 2%.
οƒ˜ Attempts by the Bank of Canada to make things better
lead to things being worse.
οƒ˜ The economy ends up with the same unemployment rate as
would have prevailed if the Bank of Canada had followed its
announced policy, but with much higher inflation .
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-11
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
Establishing Credibility
1. Make the central bank independent.
•
Appointing central bankers for longer terms will make them
more likely to resist political pressure.
2. Choose a “conservative” central banker.
•
somebody who dislikes inflation and is unwilling to accept
more inflation in exchange for less unemployment.
3. Make central banks more “transparent.”
•
Reveal to the public as much as possible concerning the
information that the central bank uses to make its decisions
and the process by which the decisions are made.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-12
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-13
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-2 | Expectations and Policy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-14
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-3 | Politics and Policy
Games between Policy Makers and Voters
• Tax cuts
• Trade-off: growth today and deficits tomorrow.
• Short versus Longsighted voters
• Political business cycle
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-15
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-3 | Politics and Policy
Some Evidence
οƒ˜ Ratio of Debt to GDP
οƒ˜ Debt buildup associated with Depression and World War II
οƒ˜ Debt/GDP fell from over 140% in 1949 to 31% in 1976
οƒ˜ Debt/GDP rose from 1976 to 1996
οƒ˜ Debt/GDP has fallen since 1996
οƒ˜ 2009 recession and the following years of large deficits, the
debt-to-GDP ratio began to rise again.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-16
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-3 | Politics and Policy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-17
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-3 | Politics and Policy
Games between Policy Makers
Budget deficit reduction in Canada.
• When first elected, the Conservative government of
Brian Mulroney had a clear mandate to reduce the
deficit. It did not succeed.
•
Some of its failure: normal electoral and political process.
• Wars of attrition.
• Some Conservatives wanted less government spending.
Others did not.
• The hope that the other side will give in leads to long
and often costly delays.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-18
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
23-3 | Politics and Policy
Back to a Balanced-Budget Law
The Case Against:
οƒ˜ It would eliminate the use of fiscal policy
οƒ˜ Deficit reduction can be achieved without the
constraints of a balanced budget law
The Case For:
οƒ˜ Macro policy is not effective
οƒ˜ Micro perspective: A new spending program
should be accompanied by a discussion on funding
it.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-19
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
Summary
• Uncertainty about the effects of macroeconomic
policies should lead policy makers to be more
cautious, use less active policies.
• Using macroeconomic policy to control the economy is
fundamentally different from controlling a machine.
• Macroeconomic policy can be thought of as a game
between policy makers and the economy.
• By credibly committing to not using monetary policy to
decrease unemployment below its natural rate, a
central bank can alleviate fears that money growth will
be high and, in the process, decrease both expected
and actual inflation.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-20
Should Policy Makers Be Restrained?
Summary
• Policy makers may play games either with the public or
among themselves, leading to undesirable outcomes.
• The evidence is that balanced-budget laws are
ineffective and easily sidestepped in practice.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Canada Inc.
23-21
Download