1 B V RAJU COLLEGE Vishnupur :: Bhimavaram – 534 202 Department of M.C.A LECTURE NOTES ON HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION III MCA I Semester 2 MCA-19503 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION (ELECTIVE-II) Instruction: 4 Periods/week Internal: 25 Marks Time: 3 Hours External: 75 Marks Credits: 4 Total: 100 Marks UNIT-I Introduction: Usability of Interactive Systems- introduction, usability goals and measures, usability motivations, universal usability, goals for our profession Managing Design Processes: Introduction, Organizational design to support usability, Four pillars of design, development methodologies, Ethnographic observation, Participatory design, Scenario Development, Social impact statement for early design review, legal issues, Usability Testing and Laboratories. UNIT-II Command and Natural Languages: Introduction, Command organization Functionality, Strategies and Structure, Naming and Abbreviations, Natural Language in Computing Interaction Devices: Introduction, Keyboards and Keypads, Pointing Devices, Speech and Auditory Interfaces, Displays- Small and large. UNIT-III Quality of Service:Introduction, Models of Response-Time impacts, Expectations and attitudes, User Productivity, Variability in Response Time, Frustrating Experiences Balancing Function and Fashion: Introduction, Error Messages, Nonanthropomorphic Design, Display Design, Web Page Design, Window Design, Color. UNIT-IV Information Search:Introduction, Searching in Textual Documents and Database Querying, Multimedia Document Searches, Advanced Filtering and Searching Interfaces Information Visualization: Introduction, Data Type by Task Taxonomy, Challenges for Information Visualization Text Books 1. Designing the User Interface, Strategies for Effective Human Computer Interaction, 5ed, Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine Cohen, Steven M Jacobs, Pearson 2. The Essential guide to user interface design,2/e, Wilbert O Galitz, Wiley DreamaTech. Reference Books 1. Human Computer, Interaction Dan R.Olsan, Cengage ,2010. 2. Designing the user interface. 4/e, Ben Shneidermann , PEA. 3. User Interface Design, Soren Lauesen , PEA. 4. Interaction Design PRECE, ROGERS, SHARPS, Wiley. 3 UNIT-I Introduction: Usability of Interactive Systems- introduction, usability goals and measures, usability motivations, universal usability, goals for our profession Managing Design Processes: Introduction, Organizational design to support usability, Four pillars of design, development methodologies, Ethnographic observation, Participatory design, Scenario Development, Social impact statement for early design review, legal issues, Usability Testing and Laboratories. INTRODUCTION Human–computer interaction (HCI), alternatively man–machine interaction (MMI) or computer–human interaction (CHI) is the study of interaction between people (users) and computers. • With today's technology and tools, and our motivation to create really effective and usable interfaces and screens, why do we continue to produce systems that are inefficient and confusing or, at worst, just plain unusable? Is it because: 1. We don't care? 2. We don't possess common sense? 3. We don't have the time? 4. We still don't know what really makes good design? DEFINITION • "Human-computer interaction is a discipline concerned with the design, evaluation and implementation of interactive computing systems for human use and with the study of major phenomena surrounding them." GOALS • A basic goal of HCI is – to improve the interactions between users and computers – by making computers more usable and receptive to the user's needs. • A long term goal of HCI is – to design systems that minimize the barrier between the human's cognitive model of what they want – to accomplish and the computer's understanding of the user's task WHY IS HCI IMPORTANT • User-centered design is getting a crucial role! • It is getting more important today to increase competitiveness via HCI studies (Norman, 1990) • High-cost e-transformation investments • Users lose time with badly designed products and services • Users even give up using bad interface – Ineffective allocation of resources 4 DEFINING THE USER INTERFACE • User interface, design is a subset of a field of study called human-computer interaction (HCI). • Human-computer interaction is the study, planning, and design of how people and computers work together so that a person's needs are satisfied in the most effective way. • HCI designers must consider a variety of factors: – what people want and expect, physical limitations and abilities people possess, how information processing systems work, – what people find enjoyable and attractive. – Technical characteristics and limitations of the computer hardware and softwaremust also be considered. • The user interface is to – the part of a computer and its software that people can see, hear, touch, talkto, or otherwise understand or direct. • The user interface has essentially two components: input and output. • Input is how a person communicates his / her needs to the computer. – Some common input components are the keyboard, mouse, trackball, one's finger, and one's voice. • Output is how the computer conveys the results of its computations and requirements to the user. – Today, the most common computer output mechanism is the display screen, followed by mechanisms that take advantage of a person's auditory capabilities: voice and sound. • The use of the human senses of smell and touch output in interface design still remain largely unexplored. • Proper interface design will provide a mix of well-designed input and output mechanisms that satisfy the user's needs, capabilities, and limitations in the most effective way possible. • The best interface is one that it not noticed, one that permits the user to focus on the information and task at hand, not the mechanisms used to present the information and perform the task. 5 THE IMPORTANCE OF GOOD DESIGN With today's technology and tools, and our motivation to create really effective and usable interfaces and screens, why do we continue to produce systems that are inefficient and confusing or, at worst, just plain unusable? Is it because: • We don't care? • We don't possess common sense? • We don't have the time? • We still don't know what really makes good design? • But we never seem to have time to find out what makes good design, nor to properly apply it. After all, many of us have other things to do in addition to designing interfacesand screens. • So we take our best shot given the workload and time constraints imposed upon us. The result, too often, is woefully inadequate. • Interface and screen design were really a matter of common sense, we developers would have been producing almost identical screens for representing the real world. • – – Example bad designs Closed door with complete wood suggestion : glass door THE IMPORTANCE OF THE USER INTERFACE • A well-designed interface and screen is terribly important to our users. It is their window to view the capabilities of the system. • It is also the vehicle through which many critical tasks are presented. These tasks often have a direct impact on an organization's relations with its customers, and its profitability. • A screen's layout and appearance affect a person in a variety of ways. If they are confusing and inefficient, people will have greater difficulty in doing their jobs and will make more mistakes. • Poor design may even chase some people away from a system permanently. It can also lead to aggravation, frustration, and increased stress. The Benefits of Good Design • – – Poor clarity forced screen users to spend one extra second per screen. Almost one additional year would be required to process all screens. Twenty extra seconds in screen usage time adds an additional 14 person years. 6 • The benefits of a well designed screen have also been under experimental scrutiny for many years. – One researcher, for example, attempted to improve screen clarity andreadability by making screens less crowded. – Separate items, which had been combined on the same display line to conserve space, were placed on separate lines instead. – The result screen users were about 20 percent more productive with the less crowded version. • Proper formatting of information on screens does have a significant positive effect on performance. – In recent years, the productivity benefits of well-designed Web pages have also been scrutinized. • Training costs are lowered because training time is reduced. • support line costs are lowered because fewer assist calls are necessary. • Employee satisfaction is increased because aggravation and frustration are reduced. • Ultimately, that an organization's customers benefit because of the improved service they receive. • Identifying and resolving problems during the design and development process also has significant economic benefits • How many screens are used each day in our technological world? • How many screens are used each day in your organization? Thousands? Millions? • Imagine the possible savings. Proper screen design might also, of course, lower the costs of replacing "broken" PCs. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERFACE • The need for people to communicate with each other has existed since we first walked upon this planet. • The lowest and most common level of communication modes we share are movements and gestures. • Movements and gestures are language independent, that is, they permit people who do not speak the same language to deal with one another. 7 • The next higher level, in terms of universality and complexity, is spoken language. • Most people can speak one language, some two or more. A spoken language is a very efficient mode of communication if both parties to the communication understand it. • At the third and highest level of complexity is written language. While most people speak, not all can write. • But for those who can, writing is still nowhere near as efficient a means .of communication as speaking. • In modem times, we have the typewriter, another step upward in communication complexity. • Significantly fewer people type than write. (While a practiced typist can find typing faster and more efficient than handwriting, the unskilled may not find this the case.) • Spoken language, however, is still more efficient than typing, regardless' of typing skill level. • Through its first few decades, a computer's ability to deal with human communication was inversely related to what was easy for people to do. -- The computer demanded rigid, typed input through a keyboard; people responded slowly using this device and with varying degrees of skill. -- The human-computer dialog reflected the computer's preferences, consisting of one style or a combination of styles using keyboards, commonly referred to as Command Language, Question and Answer, Menuselection, Function Key Selection, and Form Fill-In. • Throughout the computer's history, designers have been developing, with varying degrees of success, other human-computer interaction methods that utilize more general, widespread, and easier-to-learn capabilities: voice and handwriting. --Systems that recognize human speech and handwriting now exist, although they still lack the universality and richness of typed input. INTRODUCTION OF THE GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE • The Xerox systems, Altus and STAR, introduced the mouse and pointing and selecting as the primary human-computer communication method. • The user simply pointed at the screen, using the mouse as an intermediary. • These systems also introduced the graphical user interface as we know it a new concept was born, revolutionizing the human-computer interface. 8 A BRIEF HISTORY OF SCREEN DESIGN • While developers have been designing screens since a cathode ray tube display was first attached to a computer, more widespread interest in the application of good design principles to screens did not begin to emerge until the early 1970s, when IBM introduced its 3270 cathode ray tube text-based terminal. • A 1970s screen often resembled the one pictured in Figure. It usually consisted of many fields (more than are illustrated here) with very cryptic and often unintelligible captions. • It was visually cluttered, and often possessed a command field that challenged the user to remember what had to be keyed into it. • Ambiguous messages often required referral to a manual to interpret. • Effectively using this kind of screen required a great deal of practice and patience. • Most early screens were monochromatic, typically presenting green text on black backgrounds. • At the turn of the decade guidelines for text-based screen design were finally made widely available and many screens began to take on a much less cluttered look through concepts such as grouping and alignment of elements, as illustrated in Figure 1.2. • User memory was supported by providing clear and meaningful field captions and by listing commands on the screen, and enabling them to be applied, through function keys. Messages also became clearer. • These screens were not entirely clutter-free, however. Instructions and reminders to the user had to be inscribed on the screen in the form of prompts or completion aids such as the codes PR and Sc. 9 • Not all 1980s screens looked like this, however. In the 1980s, 1970s-type screens were still being designed, and many still reside in systems today. • The advent of graphics yielded another milestone in the evolution of screen design, as illustrated in Figure above. While some basic "design principles did not change, groupings and alignment, for example, Borders were made available to visually enhance groupings, and buttons and menus for implementing commands replaced function keys. • Multiple properties of elements were also provided, including many different font sizesand styles, line thicknesses, and colors. • The entry field was supplemented by a multitude of other kinds of controls, including list boxes, drop-down combination boxes, spin boxes, and so forth. 10 • These new controls were much more effective in supporting a person's memory, nowsimply allowing for selection from a list instead of requiring a remembered key entry. • Completion aids disappeared from screens, replaced by one of the new listing controls. Screens could also be simplified, the much more powerful computers being able to quickly present a new screen. • In the 1990s, our knowledge concerning what makes effective screen design continued to expand. Coupled with ever-improving technology, the result was even greater improvements in the user-computer screen interface as the new century dawned. 1.1 Usability of Interactive Systems- Introduction New technologies provide extraordinary-almost supernatural-powers to those people who master them. Networked computers with advanced interfaces are compelling new technologies that are being rapidly disseminated. Great excitement spreads as designers provide remarkable functions in carefully crafted interactive devices and interfaces. The opportunities for rule-breaking innovators and business-focused entrepreneurs are substantial, and the impacts on individuals, organizations, and cultures are profound. Like early photography equipment or automobiles, early computers were usable only by people who devoted effort to mastering the technology. Harnessing the computer's power is a task for designers who combine an understanding of technology with a sensitivity to human capacities and needs. User interfaces help produce business success stories and Wall Street sensations. They also produce intense competition, copyright-infringement suits, intellectual-property battles, mega-mergers, and international partnerships. Crusading Internet visionaries promote a world with free access to music, while equally devoted protectors of creative artists argue for fair payments. User interfaces are also controversial because of their central role in national identification schemes, homeland defense, crime fighting, medical records management, and so on. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, some members of the U.s. Congress blamed the inadequacies of user interfaces for the failure to detect the terrorists. At an individual level, user interfaces change many people's lives: effective user interfaces for professionals mean that doctors can make more accurate diagnoses and pilots can fly airplanes more safely; at the same time, children can learn more effectively and graphic artists can explore creative possibilities more fluidly. Some changes, however, are disruptive. Too often, users must cope with frustration, fear, and failure when they encounter excessively complex menus, incomprehensible terminology, or chaotic navigation paths. What user wouldn't be disturbed by receiving a message such as "Illegal Memory Exception: Severe Failure" with no guidance about what to do next? 11 1.2 Usability goals and measures Usability goals: 1. Ascertain the users' needs. 2. Ensure proper reliability. 3. Promote appropriate standardization, integration, consistency and portability. 4. Complete projects on schedule and within budget. Standardization refers to common user-interface features across multiple applications. Apple Computers successfully developed an early standard that was widely applied by thousands of developers, enabling users to learn multiple applications quickly. When the Microsoft Windows interface became standardized, it became a powerful force. Similarly, the standards provided by the World Wide Web Consortium have done much to accelerate adoption of the Web. Integration across application packages and software tools was one of the key design principles of Unix. (Portability across hardware platforms was another.) If file formats are used consistently, users can apply multiple applications to transform, refine, or validate their data. Consistency primarily refers to common action sequences, terms, units, layouts, colors, typography, and so on within an application program. Consistency is a strong determinant of success of interfaces. It is naturally extended to include compatibility across application programs and compatibility with paper or non-computer-based systems. Portability refers to the potential to convert data and to share user interfaces across multiple software and hardware environments. The fourth goal for interface designers is to complete projects on schedule and within budget. Proper attention to usability principles and rigorous testing often lead to reduced cost and rapid development 1.3 Usability Measures: If adequate requirements are chosen, reliability is ensured, standardization is addressed, and scheduling and budgetary planning are complete, developer can focus their attention on the design and testing process. Multiple design alternatives must be evaluated for specific user communities and for specific benchmark tasks. A clever design for one community of users may be inappropriate for another community. An efficient design for one class of tasks may be inefficient for another class. 1. Time to learn. How long does it take for typical members of the user community to learn how to use the actions relevant to a set of tasks? 2. Speed of performance. How long does it take to carry out the benchmark tasks? 3. Rate of errors by users. How many and what kinds of errors do people make in carrying out the benchmark tasks? Although time to make and correct errors might be incorporated into the speed of performance, error handling is sucha critical component of interface usage that it deserves extensive study 12 4. Retention over time. How well do users maintain their knowledge after an hour, a day, or a week? Retention may be linked closely to time to learn, and frequency of use plays an important role. 5. Subjective satisfaction. How much did users like using various aspects of the interface? The answer can be ascertained by interview or by written. 1.4 Usability motivations The enormous interest in interface usability arises from the growing recognition of how poorly designed many current interfaces are and of the benefits elegant interfaces bring to users. This increased motivation emanates from developers of life-critical systems; industrial and commercial systems; office, home, and entertainment applications; exploratory, creative, and collaborative interfaces; and socio technical systems. Life-critical systems Life-critical systems include those that control air traffic, nuclear reactors, power utilities, police or fire dispatch, military operations, and medical instruments. In these applications high costs are expected, but they should yield high reliability and effectiveness. Industrial and commercial uses Typical industrial and commercial uses include banking, insurance, order entry, inventory management, airline and hotel reservations (Fig. 1.8), car rentals, utility billing, credit-card management, and point-of-sales terminals. In these cases, costs shape many judgments. Operator training time is expensive, so ease of learning is important. Since many businesses are international, translation to multiple languages and adaptations to local cultures are necessary. Office, home, and entertainment applications The rapid expansion of office, home, and entertainment applications is the third source of interest in usability. Personal-computing applications include e-mail, bank machines, games, educational packages, search engines, cell phones, and mobile devices. For these interfaces, ease of learning, low error rates, and subjective satisfaction are paramount because use is frequently discretionary and competition is fierce. If the users cannot succeed quickly, they will abandon the use of a computer or try a competing package. In cases where use is intermittent, clear, easy-to-remember procedures are important, and if retention is still faulty, comprehensible online help becomes important. Exploratory, creative, and collaborative interfaces An increasing fraction of computer use is dedicated to supporting human intellectual and creative enterprises. Exploratory applications include World Wide Web browsing search engines, scientific simulation, and business decision making. Creative environments include writing work benches, architectural design systems Sociotechnical systems A growing domain for usability is in complex systems that involve many people over long time periods, such as systems for voting, health support, identity verification, and crime reporting. 13 1.5 Universal usability Universal usability refers to the design of information and communications products and services that are usable for every citizen. The concept has been advocated by Professor Ben Shneiderman, a computer scientist at the Human-Computer Interaction Lab at the University of Maryland, College Park. Variations in physical abilities and physical workplaces These physical abilities influence elements of the interactive-system design. They also play a prominent role in the design of the workplace or workstation (or play station). The draft standard Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations (2002) lists these concerns: work-surface and display-support height • Clearance under work surface for legs • Work-surface -width and depth • Adjustability of heights and angles for chairs and work surfaces • Posture-seating depth and angle; back-rest height and lumbar support • Availability of armrests, footrests, and palm rests • use of characteristic. Diverse cognitive and perceptual abilities •Short-term and working memory •Long-term and semantic memory •Problem solving and reasoning •Decision making and risk assessment •Language communication and comprehension •Search, imagery, and sensory memory •Learning, skill development, knowledge acquisition, and concept attainment. •Arousal and vigilance •Fatigue and sleep deprivation •Perceptual (mental) load •Knowledge of results and feedback •Monotony and boredom •Sensory deprivation •Nutrition and diet •Fear, anxiety, mood, and emotion •Drugs, smoking, and alcohol •Physiological rhythms Personality differences Extroversion versus introversion. Extroverts focus on external stimuli and like variety and action, whereas introverts prefer familiar patterns, rely on their inner ideas, and work alone contentedly. • Sensing versus intuition. Sensing types are attracted to established routines, are good at precise work, and enjoy applying known skills, whereas intuitive types like solving new problems and discovering new relations but dislike taking time for precision. • Perceptive versus judging. Perceptive types like to learn about new situations but may have trouble making decisions, whereas judging types like to make a careful plan and will seek to carry through the plan even if new facts change the goal. • Feeling versus thinking. Feeling types are aware of other people's feelings, seek to please others, and relate well to most people, whereas thinking types are unemotional, may treat people impersonally, and like to put things in logical order. 14 1.6 Goals for our profession Clear goals are useful not only for interface development but also for educational and professional enterprises. Three broad goals seem attainable: (1) influencing academic and industrial researchers; (2) providing tools, techniques, and knowledge for commercial developers; and (3) raising the computer consciousness of the general public. Influencing academic and industrial researchers: Understanding of a practical problem and related theory Lucid statement of a testable hypothesis Manipulation of a small number of independent variables Measurement of specific dependent variables Careful selection and assignment of subjects Control for bias in subjects, procedures, and materials Application of statistical tests Interpretation of results, refinement of theory, and guidance for experimenters Providing tools, techniques, and knowledge for commercial developers Raising the computer consciousness of the general public. 1.7Managing Design Processes: Introduction In the first decades of computer-software development, technically oriented programmers designed text editors, programming languages, and applications for themselves and their peers. The substantial experience and motivation of these users meant that complex interfaces v, There accepted and even appreciated. Now, the user population for mobile devices, instant messaging, e-business, and digital libraries is so vastly different from the original that programmers' intuitions may be inappropriate. Current users are not dedicated to the technology; their background is more tied to their work needs, while their use of computers for entertainment is discretionary. Designs should be based on careful observation of current users, refined by thoughtful analysis of task frequencies and sequences, and validated through early usability and thorough acceptance tests. 15 1.8 Organizational design to support usability Usability engineers and user-interface architects are gaining experience in managing organizational change. As attention shifts from software-engineering or management-information systems, battles for control and power manifest themselves in budget and personnel allocations. Well-prepared managers who have a concrete organizational plan, defensible cost/benefit analyses, and practical development methodologies are most likely to be winners. Design is inherently creative and unpredictable. Interactive system designers must blend a thorough knowledge of technical feasibility with a mystical esthetic sense of what attracts users. Carroll and Rosson (1985) characterize design in this way: • Design is a process; it is not a state and it cannot be adequately represented statically. • The design process is nonhierarchical; it is neither strictly bottom-up norstrictly top-down. • The process is radically transformational; it involves the development of partialand interim solutions that may ultimately play no role in the final design. • Design intrinsically involves the discovery of new goals. 1.9 Four pillars of design Used to help user interface architects to turn ideas into successful systems, though not guaranteed to work flawlessly. A set of fundamentals to assist interface designers optimize usability. These are benefits that are derived from Academic Research and if used properly will assist the designer in creating a Successful Interface. Ethnographic Observation provides User-interface Requirements Theories and Models provide a means of developing Guidelines Documents & Process Algorithms and Prototypes assist the development of User-interface Software Tools which can be used for Rapid-Prototyping. Controlled Experimentation provides Expert Reviews & Usability Testing 16 User Interface requirements Soliciting and clearly specifying user requirements is major key to success in any development activity for a successful end result. System Requirements, whether it be hardware, software, system performance, or reliability, must be clearly stated and agreed upon. Team must have clear understanding of requirements. Tools which construct interactive user interfaces must support rapid development and component and modular development through ethnographic observation. The ability to rapidly prototype the look-and-feel leads to early and immediate feedback. Guidelines Documents and Processes Elicit user requirements and mutually agree to them o System requirements and user requirements are aligned through interface design The more thorough and complete these are, the better chance of success o Incomplete and vague requirements create an interface adrift Examples o Performance requirements o Functional requirements o Interface requirements. User interface Software Tools *Use simple and handy tools for early prototyping:* Word, PowerPoint, Visio, etc. PageMaker, Illustrator, Photoshop. Flash, Javascript, Processing, Ajax Powerful IDEs Visual Studio C#, VisualBasic.NET, Expression Designer, etc. Java SDK Java Look and Feel Design Guidelines, Swing/JFC, LWUIT 17 1.10 Development methodologies Many software development projects fail to achieve their goals due to poor communication between Developers and their business clients/users. Successful developers o work careful to understand the business's needs and refine their skills in eliciting accurate requirements o also know that careful attention to user centered design issues during software development dramatically reduces development time and cost. o Design methodologies include: GUIDE, STUDIO, OVID Rapid contextual design Examples o Contextual Inquiry Field interviews and observation o Interpretation sessions and working modeling Team discussions on workflow and organizational issues o Model consolidation and affinity diagram building Synthesize observations and share with target population o Persona development Develop fictitious characters and enact scenarios o Visioning Walk through scenarios using the developed personal o Storyboarding Design users tasks with visuals and sequencing o User environment design Comprehensive and coherent representation, built from the storyboards o Paper prototypes and mock-up interviews Testing on paper 1.11 Ethnographic observation Early stages of most methodologies include observation of users. A user group constitutes a unique culture so, o Ethnographic methods are appropriate as they are used to observe people within their own culture o Ethnographic methods allow for immersion by listening, observing and asking questions Non-traditional ethnography o User-interface designers observe and listen in order to create designs which improve and otherwise change the users’ lives o User-interface designers do not have weeks and/months to observe, they must keep it short Intentions for observation o Influence design o Follow a valid process 18 Guidelines for an Ethnographic Study Preparation o Understand policies in work environments and family values in homes. o Familiarize yourself with the existing interface and its history. o Set initial goals and prepare questions o Gain access and permission to observe or interview. Field Study o Establish a rapport with all users o Observe and collect (objective/subjective, qualitative/quantitative) data o Follow any leads that emerge from the visits and record you visits. Analysis o Compile and organize (databases) o Quantify and summarize (statistics) o Reduce and interpret data o Refine and revisit goals Report Consider multiple audiences and goals Prepare a report and present findings 1.12 Scenario Development When a current interface is being redesigned, reliable data about the distribution of task frequencies and sequences is an enormous asset. If current data do not exist, usage logs can quickly provide insight. How is the interface used? o What is the frequency with which each user performs each task Scenarios “Day-in-the-life” helpful to characterize what happens when users perform typical tasks. Analogs and metaphors Describes novel systems Write scenarios of usage and then if possible, act them out as a form of theater, effective with multiple user cooperation. Useful applications Control rooms, cockpits, financial trading rooms and other places where people must coordinate 1.13 Social Impacts Interactive systems often have a dramatic impact on large numbers of users. To minimize risks, a thoughtful statement of anticipated impacts circulated among stakeholders can be a useful process for eliciting productive suggestions early in development. * Inspired by the environmental impact statement * Encourages early and wide discussion Examples of a social impact statement Describe the new system and it's benefits o Convey the high-level goals of the new system o identify the stakeholders. o Identify specific benefits Address concerns and potential barriers o Anticipate changes in job functions. 19 o o o o o o o o address security and privacy issues Describe accountability and responsibility for system misuse and failure. Avoid potential biases. weigh individual rights assess trade-offs between centralization and decentralization Preserve democratic principles ensure divers access promote simplicity. Outline the development process o Present an estimated project schedule o propose a process for making decisions discuss expectations of how stake holders will be involved. o recognize needs for staff,training and hardware. o propose a plan for backups of data o outline a plan for migrating to the new system. o Describe a plan for measuring the success of the new system. 1.14 Legal Issues As user interfaces have become more prominent, serious legal issues have emerged. Privacy o Medical,legal, financial, an data that can be used for unapproved access illegal tampering. . Safety and reliability o User interfaces for aircraft, automobiles, medical equipment, military systems, utility control rooms anything that can effect a life or death situation. Paten protection for software o developers who patent software who attempt to recover time and money spent on the project and make a profit. Piracy, P2P, file-sharing, etc. o Do customers have the right to store the information electronically for later use, can they share this copy, do you own the contents of an email. Freedom of Speech o Do users have the right to make controversial or potential offensive statements through e-mail or list servers? Localization: o International, Federal, State, Municipality, etc.