Risk and Return Ferdinand L. Timbang CPA, REB, MSCF, DBA Risk • Risk is the exposure to uncertainty or danger resulting to changes in the expected return in a given investment. • The chance that some unfavorable event will occur (Brigham, 4th edition). Ranking of Risk - Securities 1. Treasury bills/bonds 2. Bonds – corporate bonds 3. Mutual funds 4. Stocks The Risk- Return Trade-Off • To attract investors to take more risk, an investment should provide higher expected returns. • The higher the risk, the higher the return. Investment return Good investments: The return is sufficient to compensate for the perceived risk Risk-return trade-off Bad investments: The return is insufficient to compensate for the perceived risk Investment risk Probability A listing of all possible outcomes, and the probability of each occurrence. For instance: State of Economy Recession Normal Prosperity Probability distributions (pi) 0.20 0.60 0.20 The expected return is the return after considering the probabilities of occurrence, the state of economy, individual’s expected outcomes. Needless to say, the risk has already been factored in this type of return. Probability XYZ Corporation is planning to invest in Stock A. The firm expects that the possible returns are dependent on the state of the economy. Determine the expected return on their planned investment. State of Economy Recession Normal Prosperity Expected return (ř) Possible returns (ri) 10% 15% 20% Probability distributions (pi) 0.20 0.60 0.20 = (10% x 0.20) + (15% x 0.60) + (20% x 0.20) = 0.15 or 15% Assets Risk The asset’s risk can be analyzed in two ways: 1. Stand-alone basis. It is where the asset is considered by itself. Example: T-bill vs. Stock 2. Portfolio basis. It is where the assets is held as one of a number of assets bin a portfolio. Measuring Risk – Stand Alone = Standard deviation Variance N 2 ˆ (r - r) Pi i=1 2 Measuring Risk – Stand alone For FLI State of Economy Return ( ri ) Probability (pi) ri x pi Recession -8.00% 0.15 -1.20 Normal 15.00% 0.70 10.50 Prosperity 35.00% 0.15 5.25 ř = 14.55 = = 139.16 11.80% ( ri - ř )2 508.50 0.21 418.20 (ri - ř )2(pi) 76.28 0.15 62.73 2=139.16 Measuring Risk Using Historical Data Year 2016 Return 42.0% (ri - ř )2 (0.42 – 0.20)2 2017 2018 2019 12.0% -30.0% 56.0% (0.12 – 0.20)2 (-0.30 – 0.20)2 (0.56 – 0.20)2 Ave. 20.0% σ = square root of variance/(n-1) = (0.4344/3) = 38.05% 0.0484 0.0064 0.2500 0.1296 Variance = 0.4344 Conclusion - Measuring Risk • Standard deviation (σi) measures total, or stand-alone, risk. • The larger σi is, the lower the probability that actual returns will be closer to expected returns. • Larger σi is associated with a wider probability distribution of returns. Covariance It is a measure of the degree to which two variables move together relative to their individual mean values over time. A positive covariance means that the rates of return for two investments tend to move in the same direction relative to their individual means during the same time period. A negative covariance indicates that the rates of return for two investments tend to move in different directions relative to their means during specified time intervals overtime. For two assets, i and j, we define the covariance rates of return as: Covij = E [Ri – E(Ri)] [Rj – E(Rj)] when applied to the monthly rates of return during the n year, it becomes 1 ∑ [Ri – E(Ri)] [Rj – E(Rj)] n – 1 t=1 If the correlation coefficient is given, covariance can be computed as Cov = rijδiδj Covariance January February March April May June July August September October November December Mean Wilshire 5000 Stock Index (Ri) (1.51) 0.96 3.77 3.33 (1.55) (3.47) 1.12 3.46 2.03 (4.73) (0.76) (6.23) (0.30) A Wilshire 5000 Lehman Brothers Stock Index Treasury Bonds (Rj) (Ri - Ri) (0.16) (1.21) 1.66 1.26 (0.05) 4.07 0.52 3.63 (0.90) (1.25) (0.04) (3.17) 1.66 1.42 1.57 3.76 0.54 2.33 0.79 (4.43) 3.07 (0.46) 0.08 (5.93) 0.73 B Lehman Brothers Treasury Bonds (Rj - Rj) (0.89) 0.93 (0.78) (0.21) (1.63) (0.77) 0.93 0.84 (0.19) 0.06 2.34 (0.65) AxB 1.08 1.17 (3.17) (0.76) 2.04 2.44 1.32 3.16 (0.44) (0.27) (1.08) 3.85 9.34 Covariance The covariance between the rates of return for Wilshire and Lehman is Covi,j = = 1 (12 – 1) 0.85 (9.34) The relationship was not very strong because there are months that the two assets moved counter to each other. The 0.85 might indicate a weak positive relationship if the two individual indexes were volatile, but would reflect a strong positive relationship if the two indexes were stable. Covariance Correlation Coefficient To standardize the covariance by the product of the individual standard deviations yields the correlation coefficient rij. It can only vary from -1 to +1. A +1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship between Ri and Rj. It means that the return for the two assets move together in a completely linear manner. A -1 indicates a perfect negative relationship between the two return indexes. To compute for the correlation coefficient, we have rij = Covij δiδj where rij = the correlation coefficient of returns δi = the standard deviation of Rit δj = the standard deviation of Rjt Correlation Coefficient January February March April May June July August September October November December Mean Variance Std. Deviation Wilshire 5000 Stock Index (Ri) (1.51) 0.96 3.77 3.33 (1.55) (3.47) 1.12 3.46 2.03 (4.73) (0.76) (6.23) (0.30) 11.00 3.32 Lehman Brothers Treasury Bonds (Rj) (0.16) 1.66 (0.05) 0.52 (0.90) (0.04) 1.66 1.57 0.54 0.79 3.07 0.08 0.73 1.19 1.09 rij = Covij δiδj = 0.85 (3.32)(1.09) = 0.235 Portfolio Risk p = w2A2A+w2B2B+2wAwB CovA,B Or p = w2A2A+w2B2B+2wAwB ● (ρ) ABAB Portfolio risk is associated with the total risks of the portfolio consisting of systematic and unsystematic risks. Portfolio Risk Weight is 50% for Wilshire and 50% for Lehman p = w2W2W+w2L2L+2wWwL ● (ρ) WLWL = (0.50)(11.0) + (0.50)(1.19) + 2 (0.50)(0.50) (0.235)(3.32)(1.09) = 2.55 p = w2W2W+w2L2L+2wWwL CovW,L = (0.50)(11.0) + (0.50) (1.19) + 2 (0.50)(0.50) (0.85) = 2.55 Equal Risk and Return with Changing Correlations Example: E(R1) = 0.20 E(R2) = 0.20 E(δ1) = 0.10 E(δ2) = 0.10 Consider the following five correlation coefficients and the covariances they yield. a. r1,2 = 1.00 Cov1,2 = (1.0)(0.10)(0.10) = 0.01 b. r1,2 = 0.50 Cov1,2 = (0.50)(0.10)(0.10) = 0.05 c. r1,2 = 0.00 Cov1,2 = (0.00)(0.10)(0.10) = 0.00 d. r1,2 = -0.50 Cov1,2 = (-0.50)(0.10)(0.10) = -0.005 e. r1,2 = -1.00 Cov1,2 = (-1.00)(0.10)(0.10) = -0.01 Computing the standard deviation for each using the portfolio standard deviation, we have: a. δport(a) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.01) = 0.10 Equal Risk and Return with Changing Correlations Computing the standard deviation for each using the portfolio standard deviation, we have: a. δport(a) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.01) = 0.10 b. δport(b) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.05) = 0.0866 c. δport(c) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.00) = 0.0707 d. δport(d) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(-0.005) = 0.05 e. δport(e) = (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (0.5)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(-0.01) = 0.0 Equal Risk and Return with Changing Correlations Combining Stocks with Different Returns and Risk Asset 1 2 Case A B C D E E(Ri) 0.10 0.20 Correlation Coefficient (r1,2) +1.00 +0.50 0.00 -0.50 -1.00 Wi 0.50 0.50 Variance (δ2) Std. Dev(δ) 0.0049 0.07 0.0100 0.10 Covariance (r1,2,δ1δ2) 0.0070 0.0035 0.0000 -0.0035 -0.0070 Er = 0.10(0.50 + 0.20(0.50) Combining Stocks with Different Returns and Risk Computing the standard deviation for each using the portfolio standard deviation, we have: Notice that the 2 2 2 2 a. δport(a) = (0.5) (0.07) + (0.5) (0.10) + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.0070) perfect negative = 0.085 correlation did not result to 2 2 2 2 b. δport(b) = (0.5) (0.07) + (0.5) (0.10) + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.0035) zero standard = 0.07399 deviation. It is because the 2 2 2 2 c. δport(c) = (0.5) (0.07) + (0.5) (0.10) + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(0.00) different = 0.0610 examples have equal weights, 2 2 2 2 d. δport(d) = (0.5) (0.07) + (0.5) (0.10) + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(-0.0035) but the asset = 0.0444 standard deviations are 2 2 2 2 e. δport(e) = (0.5) (0.07) + (0.5) (0.10) + (2)(0.5)(0.5)(-0.0070) not equal. = 0.0015 Constant Correlation With Changing Weights Assume that the correlation coefficient is 0. Case F G H I J K L A1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 A2 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 W1 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.80 1.00 W2 E(Ri) 1.00 0.20 0.80 0.18 0.60 0.16 0.50 0.15 0.40 0.14 0.20 0.12 0.00 0.10 Asset 1 2 Variance Std. (δ2) Dev(δ) 0.0049 0.07 0.0100 0.10 Constant Correlation With Changing Weights Computing the standard deviation for each using the portfolio standard deviation, we have: δport(f) = (0.0)2 (0.07)2 + (1.0)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.0)(0.1)(0.00) = 0.10 δport(g) = (0.20)2 (0.07)2 + (0.80)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.20)(0.80)(0.00) = 0.0812 δport(h) = (0.40)2 (0.07)2 + (0.60)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.40)(0.60)(0.00) = 0.0662 δport(j) = (0.60)2 (0.07)2 + (0.40)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.60)(0.40)(0.00) = 0.0580 δport(k) = (0.80)2 (0.07)2 + (0.20)2 (0.10)2 + (2)(0.80)(0.20)(0.00) = 0.0595 Constant Correlation With Changing Weights Summary where the correlation coefficient is 0. Case F G H I J K L A1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 A2 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 W1 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.80 1.00 W2 E(Ri) 1.00 0.20 0.80 0.18 0.60 0.16 0.50 0.15 0.40 0.14 0.20 0.12 0.00 0.10 E(δport) 0.1000 0.0812 0.0662 0.0610 0.0580 0.0595 0.0700 Three-Asset Portfolio E(ri) E(δi) Wi Stocks (S) 0.12 0.20 0.60 Bonds (B) 0.08 0.10 0.30 Cash Equivalent (C) 0.04 0.03 0.10 Asset Classes The correlation coefficients are RS,B = 0.25 RS,C = -0.08 RB,C = 0.15 E(Rport) = (0.60)(0.12) + (0.30)(0.08) + (0.10)(0.04) = 0.10 δ2port = [w2S2S + w2B2B + w2C2C] + [2wSwB ● ρSBSB] + [2wSwC ●ρSCSC] + [2wBwC ●ρBCBC] = [(0.60)2(0.20)2 + (0.30)2(0.10)2 + (0.10)2(0.03)2 ] + [2(0.60)(0.30)(0.25)(0.20)(0.10)] + = [2(0.60)(0.10)(-0.08)(0.20)(0.03)] + [2(0.30)(0.10)(0.15)(0.10)(0.03)] = 0.015309 + 0.0018 - 0.0000576 + 0.000027 = 0.170784 δport = √0.170784 = 0.1306 0r 13.06%