Running Head: EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE SUBSTANTIATING POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS
Name
Institution
Course
Date
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
2
Introduction
For public health Community institutions, the sustainability of evidence-based
interventions (EBIs) is a challenge. Researchers and practitioners do not uniformly agree on
the conceptual notion of sustainability and tactics used to support EBI are not consistently
reported in published literary material. Due to the limitations in this sector, a systematic
review was done in order to summarize the current evidence supporting separate EBIs and
sustainability criteria.
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are described as the most relevant information
supporting the procurer's decision. EBIs have been derived from the movement of evidencebased medicine. This movement has been adopted in recent years in many sectors involving
routine intervention and clinical decision-making. This encompasses a variety (Rosswurm &
Larrabee 1999)) of EBIs in therapeutic research, preventive, policy, medicine, public health
and health overall. While EBIs are conceptually attractive, our grasp of the implementation
procedures including sustainability essential to execute these practices in community-based
environments over time remains ambiguous.
Special definitions of conceptually distinct terms, sustainability and sustainability
have been supplied by the D&I field. Sustainability is "as much as a proven intervention can
deliver its expected benefits for a prolonged period following termination of external
support," while sustainment is defined as "the creation and support of organizational or
institutional structures, processes and processes that enhance the performance of an
innovation in the system or organization."
Strategy For Evidence Supporting Improvement Interventions
I would like to say that the pandemic has highlighted patient safety and the
Department of Defence health problem to determine whether the current health care
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
3
environment represents a chance for a substantial improvement for my existing Organization.
The present company I examine is the Defence Health Agency, in which my institution is
comprised of the 23rd Medical Group. There is sufficient literary data to confirm the DoD
response from earlier health outbreaks to the current health issue of COVID-19. Proof-based
practices (EBPs) steps can be assessed with regard to research and knowledge generation.
One option is to transmit information from knowledge, social marketing, social and
organizational innovation and behaviour modification to the Health Care Research and
Quality Agency (AHRQ) and patient safety models. Three main stages indicate knowledge
transfer steps through the AHRQ paradigm. Knowlagent of research development and
distillation in real-world health environments from multiple delivery systems (Kalsi-Ryan &
Verrier 2011).
Through EBP dissemination and dissemination cooperation with other healthcare
leaders in other organizations is the dissemination of knowledge which becomes the basis for
action. In this case, information is distributed during the pandemic from Disease Control
Centres to military officers. The third phase involves the implementation and implementation
of research findings by health organizations. The key to EBP is for the organization to
implement and implement changes (Kerr et al., 2021). Based on the present epidemic, the
evidence to justify the challenge
There is enough evidence for improvements in both military and civic healthcare. In
the last 20 months, a broader spectrum of information sources has been provided based on
what we learnt. The implementation of established population health strategy requires
increased disease rates, reduced financing and a scientific basis for intervention. EBP and
health monitoring and policy-making are essential instruments for eradicating pandemics and
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
4
changing health comfortabilities. The EBP's major public health and military health
components are;

Involve the community in evaluation and making judgments

Use of information and data systems

Take judgments based on facts examined by peers

Applying Frameworks for Programming

Sound assessment and dissemination of what is found
Whatever has turned out to be an issue faced by many organizations, is that many
EBP health initiatives take place under political and public pressure (Lee et al., 2021).
Evidenced that more civilian statistics are available, I found comparing civil health facilities
with air force facilities. While the other military services have numbers and answers posted,
my website has limited data. I think it is not population-specific, but site-specific because of a
HIPAA release in July 2020. This unlawful publication created a media frenzy for my present
facility through social media.
The transfer of information is therefore more protected. On the other side, there are
greater possibilities for more evidence to become present with the increasing COVID delta
variation. At now, 59,337 members of the aviation force (armed services, personnel, civil and
construction companies) are affected (Lee et al., 2021). The potential results for my
organization include an increase in the number of operations committed to COVID screening
and vaccination over increasing hours.
Defend Of the Evidence-Based Intervention
Evidence has been provided for the successful implementation of many public health
initiatives in academic environments. It is nonetheless an issue to ensure that they might be
transferred to community settings or organizations while sustaining trustworthiness. This
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
problem could be due to a lack of clarity or awareness of the frameworks concerned and the
procedures taken to achieve the sustainability of the procedure (Popay et al., 2006).
Conforming to these findings, only five research indicated an existing framework to ensure
the continuation of the EBI in our systematic review. My results support limited studies on
sustainability strategies. This sub reporting could therefore be expected to widen the
research-practice gap further.
5
EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
Reference
Rosswurm, M. A., & Larrabee, J. H. (1999). A model for change to evidence‐based
practice. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(4), 317-322.
Kerr, A., Kelleher, C., Pawlikowska, T., & Strawbridge, J. (2021). How can pharmacists
develop patient-pharmacist communication skills? A realist synthesis. Patient
Education and Counseling.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S.
(2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A
product from the ESRC methods programme Version, 1, b92.
Kalsi-Ryan, S., & Verrier, M. C. (2011). A synthesis of best evidence for the restoration of
upper-extremity function in people with tetraplegia. Physiotherapy Canada, 63(4),
474-489.
Lee, S., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Substantiating Clinical Effectiveness and Potential
Barriers to the Widespread Implementation of Spinal Cord Injury Telerehabilitation:
A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis of Randomized Trials in the Recent
Past Decade. Telemedicine Reports, 2(1), 64-77.
6