SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT and POVERTY Allan WM Estillore, DPA Student ISSUES Understanding Youth’s Role to Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Population and Aging in Asia: The Growing Elderly Population Strategies for Providing Social Protection to All The Marawi Relief Effort Ambitious Vision to End Poverty in the Philippines 2040 ‘Social Development’ • ‘Social’ means relating to society or its organization • ‘Develop’ = to unfold itself or to grow into fuller or mature condition • ‘Ment’- referring to an instrument of action, an act or process • Therefore, Social Development refers to the progressive improvements in the living conditions and quality of life enjoyed by society and shared by its members. Social Development • Social development has been described as a process of change from the traditional way of living of rural communities to progressive ways of living. • As a method by which people can be assisted to develop themselves on their own capacities and resources, social development is more concerned with the investment in human beings. Social Development • A unit of investment in education, health, social welfare etc., social development aims at the total development of people. • Social development is inter-sectoral, interregional and inter- disciplinary and visualizes institutional and structural reforms to provide greater social justice. Social Development • According to Bilance, 1997 “Social Development is the promotion of a sustainable society that is worthy of human dignity by empowering marginalized groups, women and men, to undertake their own development, to improve their social and economic position and to acquire their rightful place in society.” • According to Amartya Sen, 1995 “Social Development is equality of social opportunities.” Social Development • The Copenhagen Social Summit, 1995 defined Social Development in terms of three basic criteria: Poverty Eradication Employment Generation Social Harmony Social Development • According to M.S Gore, the concept of social development is inclusive of economic development but it emphasizes the development of the society in totality that is, in its economic, political, social and cultural aspects. In the broadest sense “it signifies all aspects of development that are of collective nature pertaining to the society as a whole.” Social Development • In a narrower sense, it would be used with reference to the human welfare aspects of development, that is improving the quality of life and more equitable distribution of material and cultural goods. • Social development may be used in connection with structural transformation in society seeking changes in the system of stratification and in degree of mobility. Social Development • Social development requires decentralization of power and decision making so that process of planning at the grass root level is made possible. • Active people’s participation in making political and economic decision involving their welfare. There should be combination of central leadership, central coordination and central resources contribution with decentralized decision making and mobilization of local resources to make social development programs more effective. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT • Social development: Equitable growth for all. • Social development is about achieving equitable and sustainable improvements in the physical, social, and economic well-being of individuals and groups, especially the socially or economically disadvantaged. Dimensions of Social Development • Two interrelated dimensions: First, the development of capacity of people to work continuously for their own and society’s welfare. Secondly, the alteration of institutions so that human needs are met at all levels especially the lowest, through the process of improving the relationships between expression of needs and the means to attain them. Areas of Development Economic Development Political Development Social Development Goals of Social Development • To create a society where living conditions of the people are better. • People do not suffer from hunger and are not denied the basic necessities of life. • To remove regional imbalance and rural-urban disparities. • To create infrastructure where basic needs of the people are met at all levels, including those who constitute the poorest and deprived sections of society. Features of Social Development • The process of social development is inextricably linked to economic development. • SocDev has an interdisciplinary focus which draws insights of the various social sciences (be it political science, sociology, philosophy, economics, psychology etc.) Emerging Social Development Concepts • Social development invokes a sense of process, i.e., it is a dynamic concept in which the notion of growth and change is explicit. • The process of change is progressive in nature, social development proclaims a faith in the prospect of human betterment. Emerging Social Development Concept • SocDev is about improving the well-being of every individual in society so they can reach their full potential. • The success of society is linked to the well-being of each and every citizen. Emerging Social Development Concept • SocDev is investing in people. • It is about refusing to accept that people who live in poverty will always be poor. • It is about helping people so they can move forward on their path to self-sufficiency. Emerging Social Development Concept • Social Development focuses on the need to “put people first” in development processes. Poverty is more than low income – it is also about vulnerability, exclusion, unaccountable institutions, powerlessness, and exposure to violence. • Social Development promotes social inclusion of the poor and vulnerable by empowering people, building cohesive and resilient societies, and making institutions accessible and accountable to citizens. (Worldbank) POVERTY • 1995:United Nations adopted two definitions of poverty. Absolute Poverty Overall Poverty Poverty • Absolute poverty was defined as: A condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services. Poverty • Overall poverty takes various forms, including: Lack of income and productive resources to ensure sustainable livelihoods; hunger and malnutrition; ill health; limited or lack of access to education and other basic services; increased morbidity and mortality from illness; homelessness and inadequate housing; unsafe environments and social discrimination and exclusion. It is also characterized by lack of participation in decision making and in civil, social and cultural life. Poverty • Occurs in all countries • as mass poverty in many developing countries, • pockets of poverty amid wealth in developed countries • loss of livelihoods as a result of economic recession • sudden poverty as a result of disaster or conflict • the poverty of low-wage workers, and • the utter destitution of people who fall outside family support systems, social institutions and safety nets. AmBisyon 2040 MATATAG, MAGINHAWA AT PANATAG NA BUHAY TO LAY DOWN THE FOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH, A HIGH-TRUST SOCIETY, AND A GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY “MALASAKIT” ENHANCING THE SOCIAL FABRIC Ensure people-centered, clean, and efficient governance Pursue swift and fair administration of justice Promote Philippine culture and values Ensure peace and security “PATULOY NA PAG-UNLAD” INCREASING GROWTH POTENTIAL “PAGBABAGO” INEQUALITY-REDUCING TRANSFORMATION Increase access to economic opportunities Expand economic opportunities Promote technology adoption Stimulate innovation IMPLEMENT STRATEGIC TRADE AND FISCAL POLICY, MAINTAIN MACROECONOMIC STABILITY, PROMOTE COMPETITION Accelerate human capital development Accelerate strategic infrastructure development Reduce vulnerability of individuals Ensure safety and build resilience Maximize demographic dividend Ensure ecological integrity, clean and healthy environment • AmBisyon Natin 2040 represents the collective long-term vision and aspirations of the Filipino people for themselves and for the country in the next 25 years. • It describes the kind of life that people want to live, and how the country will be by 2040. • As such, it is an anchor for development planning across at least four administrations. • AmBisyon Natin 2040 is a picture of the future, a set of life goals and goals for the country. It is like a destination that answers the question “Where do we want to be?” • AmBisyon Natin 2040 is the result of a long-term visioning process that began in 2015. More than 300 citizens participated in focus group discussions and close to 10,000 answered the national survey. The Life We Want Matatag • • Living together with family Time with family and friends (work/life balance) Maginhawa • • • • Freedom from hunger and poverty Guaranteed mobility Secure home ownership Travel and vacation opportunities Panatag • Security of place • Resources adequate for dayto-day needs and unexpected expenses Passive income during retirement • 3.9 An overwhelming majority of Filipinos aspire for a simple and comfortable life… % Life of the Rich 16.9 % Prosperous or 79.2 A ffluent Life % Simple and Comfortable Life 30 What is a “simple and comfortable” life ? Own at least one car Have enough money for dayto-day needs Own a medium-sized home Decent work All children are college-educated Relax with family and friends Business owner Able to take occasional trips around the country What is a “simple and comfortable” life ? P 120,000 Gross Monthly Family Income 25,000 5,000 Own one car 10,000 Income Tax All children are college-educated 40,000 Have enough money for day-today needs 30,000 Own a mediumsized home 4,000 Relax with family and friends 6,000 Able to take occasional trips around the country Vision for the Country: Hunger, local employment and poverty are the main socioeconomic issues that should be addressed No one is hungry 64 All Filipinos have a chance for adequate jobs.... 51 No one is poor 50 Everyone can get treatment when sick 50 38 All Filipino families have their own house 36 Everyone has modern lifestyle The country is a world leader in science Base: Total Interviews unwtd/wtd (10000/10000) 17 10 Eradication of corruption is the most important aspect of governance that should be addressed Eradication of Corruption 82 16 11 98 2 96 Fair enforcement of the law 76 22 2 98 2 96 Fast and easy processes 74 24 2 98 2 96 Order and Safety in the... 72 26 21 97 3 94 Fast response towards... 72 25 21 97 3 94 21 97 3 94 Enough avenues to be able... Slightly important Base: Total Interviews unwtd/wtd (10000/10000) 69 Slightly not important 28 Definitely not important From vision to action 20292034 20232028 20172022 20352040 • Requires strong ownership and buy-in by stakeholders and the country’s leaders over the next 25 years • Each plan must build on previous plan, not change it unnecessarily • Needs and preferences may change over time • Unexpected developments may arise (e.g. climate, science & technology) 35 10-POINT SOCIO- ECONOMIC AGENDA 1. Continue and maintain current macroeconomic policies, including fiscal, monetary, and trade policies. 2. Institute progressive tax reform and more effective tax collection, indexing taxes to inflation. 3. Increase competitiveness and the ease of doing business. 4. Accelerate annual infrastructure spending to account for 5% of GDP, with Public-Private Partnerships playing a key role. 5. Promote rural and value chain development toward increasing agricultural and rural enterprise productivity and rural tourism. 10-POINT SOCIO- ECONOMIC AGENDA 6. Ensure security of land tenure to encourage investments, and address bottlenecks in land management and titling agencies. 7. Invest in human capital development, including health and education systems, and match skills and training. 8. Promote science, technology, and the creative arts to enhance innovation and creative capacity. 9. Improve social protection programs, including the government's Conditional Cash Transfer program. 10. Strengthen implementation of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law. EMERGING 10++ SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENDA 1. Promote rural development to ensure food selfsufficiency; 2. Ensure access to land and property through democratization & post-land distribution support; 3. Enhance broad-based, sustainable livelihood and employment that are sector-specific and areabased; 4. Promote accessible, inclusive, nationalist, allencompassing and rights-based education; 5. Develop a culture-sensitive development program that advances artistic expression and strengthens Filipino Identity and Nationalism; EMERGING 10++ SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENDA 6. Encourage continuity of Peace Process and provide development and protection in conflict-related areas in the attainment of lasting peace; 7. Promote government accountability for community empowerment, resiliency, safety and sustainability; 8. Ensure universal health care to basic social services, especially heath care and education; 9. Invest heavily in human capital for health and education systems; and 10. Uphold rights to self-determination of IPs, Bangsamoro and other peoples. Vision for Country “By 2040, the Philippines shall be a prosperous, predominantly middle-class society where no one is poor. Our people will enjoy long and healthy lives, are smart and innovative, and will live in a high-trust society” Understanding Youth’s Role to Achieving Sustainable Development Goals “Connected to each other like never before, young people want to and already contribute to the resilience of their communities, proposing innovative solutions, driving social progress and inspiring political change.” Youth and the SDG “They are also agents of change, mobilizing to advance the Sustainable Development Goals to improve the lives of people and the health of the planet.” Youth and the SDG • 1.8 billion people between the ages of 10-24 • 25 % of the global population, with 87 % of this youth population residing in developing countries • Largest generation of youth in history. • Close to 90 % live in developing countries. • Expected to grow—between 2015 and 2030 alone, about 1.9 billion young people are projected to turn 15 years old Youth and the SDG • Youth can be a driving force for supporting development and contributing to peace and security. • Youth-led organizations need to be empowered in translating the 2030 Agenda into local, national and regional policy. • They play a significant role in the implementation, monitoring and review of the Agenda and in holding governments accountable. • With political commitment and adequate resources, the youth have the potential to make the most effective transformation of the world into a better place for all. The UN and the Youth • Building on its global convening role, the United Nations is uniquely placed to act as a source of protection and support for young people, and a platform through which their needs can be addressed, their voice can be amplified, and their engagement can be advanced. The UN and the Youth • The UN recognizes young people as rights-holders, and promotes and facilitates transparency, accountability, and responsiveness from governments, international organizations and others toward young people. Roles for Youth and the SDGs • Critical thinkers: Part of being young involves making sense of personal experiences and asking questions about the world around them. Youth have the capacity to identify and challenge existing power structures and barriers to change, and to expose contradictions and biases Roles for Youth and the SDGs • Change-makers: Young people also have the power to act and mobilize others. Youth activism is on the rise the world over, bolstered by broader connectivity and access to social media. Roles for Youth and the SDGs • Innovators: In addition to bringing fresh perspectives, young people often have direct knowledge of and insights into issues that are not accessible to adults. Youth best understand the problems they face and can offer new ideas and alternative solutions. Roles for Youth and the SDGs • Communicators: Outside the international development sector, few people are aware that world leaders have come to a historic, far-reaching agreement to improve the lives of people and the planet by 2030. Young people can be partners in communicating the development agenda to their peers and communities at the local level, as well as across countries and regions. Roles for Youth and the SDGs • Leaders: When young people are empowered with the knowledge of their rights and equipped with leadership skills, they can drive change in their communities and countries. Youth and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development • World Youth Report on “Youth and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, prepared by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) Youth and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development • “…mutually supportive roles of the new agenda and current youth development efforts.” • provides insight into the role of young people in sustainable development in the context of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and related frameworks. Youth and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development • considers the role the 2030 Agenda can play in enhancing youth development efforts. • examines how evidence-based youth policies can help accelerate youth-related objectives. • explores the critical role of young people in the implementation of sustainable development efforts at all levels. Advancing Youth Development • The active engagement of youth in sustainable development efforts is central to achieving sustainable, inclusive and stable societies by 2030, and to averting the worst threats and challenges to sustainable development, including the impacts of climate change, unemployment, poverty, gender inequality, conflict, and migration. Why young people are key to achieving the SDGs? • The goals established that young people are a driving force for development – but only if they are provided with the skills and opportunities needed to reach their potential, support development and contribute to peace and security. Why young people are key to achieving the SDGs? • One way of doing this would be by implementing an economic citizenship strategy for children and youth. • It would help national policymakers and leading youth-serving organizations achieve many of the SDGs and sub-targets in the drive to create a viable economic and social system for the future. What is economic citizenship? • An emerging concept in the field of development, economic citizenship refers to “economic and civic engagement to promote sustainable livelihoods, sustainable economic and financial well-being, a reduction in poverty and rights for self and others”. • An environment where every citizen has the opportunity and the capacity to exercise his or her economic, social and cultural rights”. Economic Citizenship Economic citizenship has the potential to improve economic and social well-being, increase economic and social engagement, enhance understanding of and respect for basic rights, reduce income and asset poverty, and lead to sustainable livelihoods for children and youth. Main Pillars of Economic Citizenship 1. 2. 3. 4. Financial inclusion is access to safe, appropriate, and affordable financial services. Financial education includes instruction and/or materials designed to increase financial knowledge and skills. Social education is the provision of knowledge and skills that improve an individual’s understanding and awareness of their rights and the rights of others. Livelihood education builds one’s ability to secure a sustainable livelihood through skills assessment and a balance between developing entrepreneurial and employability skills • Youth Campaigns http://www.nottooyoungtorun.org/ • We believe that if you’re old enough to vote, you’re old enough to run for office. • 73% of countries restrict young people from running for office, even when they can vote. Population and Aging in Asia: The Growing Elderly Population Asia’s elderly population is projected to reach nearly 923 million by the middle of this century. As a result, the region is on track in the next few decades to become one of the oldest in the world. Over the coming decades Asia will rapidly age, governments must prepare for this reality. Asia is on track to have the oldest population in the world in next few decades. The proportion of people aged 60 and over is projected to grow in all Asian countries with Japan and South Korea aging faster than their neighbors. Laos will remain the youngest nation in Asia. Japan has the largest population of elderly people at 33.1 %. South Korea is growing older faster than any other country. The older population is projected to grow from 18.5 percent to 31.4 percent by 2030. Thailand is the third rapidly aging country in Asia. Thailand’s population is projected to grow by 26.9 percent by 2030 which means one out of four Thais will be a senior citizen. China’s one-child policy has resulted in the demographic transition the Japan way. The aged population is Analysts: Negative impact on projected to grow from 15. China’s growing economy as 2 percent to 25. 3 percent. the workforce will shrink faster than its overall population Sri Lanka: 5th rapidly growing population of older people in Asia. Vietnam: aging quickly with 17.5 % people projected to be old by 2030 which means 1/3 of total population would be old. Vietnam has proposed two child solution and increasing retirement age to increase the labor force in order to deal with burden of the aging population. India remains a young nation; has currently 8.9 % of older population. 2030: 12.5 % of the population that will be old. In 2008 India revised the scheme for older people to provide nursing care centers and respite care homes. Nepal will have 10. 8 % older population by 2030 The Philippines and Bangladesh will see an increase to 10.3 and 11.5 respectively. Cambodia, Pakistan and Mongolia will have an increase in older population by 10.4, 8.4 and 11.9 respectively. Laos will remain the youngest nation in Asia and is estimated to have just 8.1 percent population aged 60 and over by 2030. “Asia's worst aging fears begin to come true: Policymakers in South Korea, China and Japan stare into demographic abyss” A nursing home in Japan: Social security outlays have ballooned over the past two decades, forcing the government to borrow to sustain the system. (Photo by Akira Kodaka) The Gray Abyss The Asian century is going to be gray. Aging populations - to fundamentally change societies, business strategies and government policies. Trend could tilt the regional and global power balance, as some economies are stunted while others continue to grow on the back of still-plentiful labor. How does aging population affect the economy? Population ageing is harmful for economic growth; leads to a shrink in the workforce relative to total population. Direct effect of population ageing through labor market participation Rise in social security tax on the workforce as the dependency ratio rises Increase in labor income tax in Asia given the projected demographic transition. Population ageing could lead to an increase in government consumption due to the rise in the demand for health care. Singapore-based Asia Pacific Risk Center: Asia's population is ageing faster than anywhere in the world; the swelling ranks of the elderly will cost the region $20 trillion in healthcare by 2030 Health systems, businesses and families across Asia-Pacific will come under huge pressure as some 200 million people pass the age of 65 by then. Yearly spending on caring for the elderly is expected to reach $2.5 billion—five times the cost in 2015 “Low fertility eventually leads to too few people of workingage in a population—creating an insufficient support ratio for catchup with advanced economies... Fertility affects the support ratio with a time lag and complex dynamics.” Strategies for Providing Social Protection to All What is SOCIAL PROTECTION? ADB: Social protection is defined as the set of policies and programs designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability by promoting efficient labor markets, diminishing people’s exposure to risks, and enhancing their capacity to protect themselves against hazards and interruption/loss of income. (https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutionaldocument/32100/social-protection.pdf) Defining social protection • “Social safety net” and “social security” • “Social safety net” appears to have a less precise meaning; some people use it to mean the whole set of programs and policies/strategies of social protection; welfare programs targeted to the poor. • “Social security” is generally used to refer to the comprehensive mechanisms and coverage in high-income countries, and is less applicable to new areas such as community and area based schemes. (ADB) • ADB: The Asia and Pacific Region has half of the world’s population. Of the total 3.1 billion, 900 million are poor (30%), 1.2 billion are children and youth (40%) and 1.8 billion live in rural areas (60%). These populations are highly vulnerable. Social Protection systems should be built to address these needs. Social Protection: Concepts/Definitions Concerned with protecting and helping those who are poor, vulnerable, marginalized or dealing with risks. Vulnerable groups helped by social protection include poor children, women, older people, and people living with disabilities, as well as the displaced, the unemployed, and the sick. Social Protection: Concepts/Definitions Social protection is commonly understood as ‘all public and private initiatives that provide income or consumption transfers to the poor, protect the vulnerable against livelihood risks and enhance the social status and rights of the marginalized; with the overall objective of reducing the economic and social vulnerability of poor, vulnerable and marginalized groups’ (Devereux & SabatesWheeler, 2004: i). https://gsdrc.org/topicguides/social-protection/what-is-social-protection/ Objectives of Social Protection • The objectives of social protection vary widely, from: reducing poverty and vulnerability building human capital empowering women improving livelihoods, and responding to economic and other shocks. • There is a great deal of variation in social protection approach, composition, and implementation. (UNDP, 2016: 14) Social Protection Frameworks Devereux & Sabates-Wheeler (2004): most commonly used conceptual framework/ 4 social protection functions: 1. Protective: providing relief from deprivation (e.g. income benefits, state pensions); 2. Preventative: averting deprivation (e.g. social insurance, savings clubs); 3. Promotive: enhancing incomes and capabilities (e.g. inputs, public works); and 4. Transformative: social equity and inclusion, empowerment, and rights (e.g. labor laws). Social protection and the Sustainable Development Goals: Source: BMZ (2017), adapted by DFID; UN (2015) Social Protection for All • Social protection systems must meet three basic conditions if they are to leave no one behind: 1. they must provide universal coverage; 2. be accessible to all, and 3. offer sufficient benefits to ensure income security Social Protection for All – Universal Coverage • United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: “All persons should be covered by the social security system, especially individuals belonging to the most disadvantaged and marginalized groups, without discrimination on any of the grounds prohibited under article 2, paragraph 2, of the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights”. Social protection coverage of disadvantaged social groups • Attributes such as age, gender, disability, origin, ethnicity and race continue to exacerbate the risk of being left behind in rich and poor countries. • Children, persons with disabilities, migrants, members of ethnic or racial minorities and indigenous peoples are at higher risk of poverty than other groups. • The income security of most older persons is at risk once they leave the labor market. • Lack of job opportunities puts young people at high risk of poverty as well, with great costs for societies in terms of wasted human and productive potential. • More data will be needed to ensure that everyone is adequately covered by social protection systems. • Cross-country data on access to other programs— such as unemployment benefits for persons with disabilities or households with children—is largely lacking. • Information on social protection coverage by race, ethnicity, indigenous or migrant status is scant. • Data on the coverage of young people are also lacking. • Information base on what appear to be largely underserved groups of the population needs to be improved • Access to social protection varies significantly between social groups but also between countries, including those with similar income levels or in the same region. • For example, the proportion of older persons who received a pension was estimated at 52 per cent in Ecuador but at only 19 per cent in Peru in 2016, even though the two countries have similar GDP per capita. Likewise, 100 per cent of persons with disabilities receive disability benefits in Mongolia, compared with 3 per cent in the Philippines (ILO, 2017a). • Women lag systematically behind in terms of access to social protection across all groups/countries. The disadvantages they face, including in the labor market, curtail their entitlements and hinder their effective coverage. • Workers in the informal sector are insufficiently covered by social protection, or not covered at all. • Many other people—from members of ethnic minorities with disabilities to homeless migrants and people living in the most extreme poverty— suffer from overlapping disadvantages. Impact of Social Protection • Social protection is fundamental for achieving the SDGs. Despite gaps in coverage, social protection systems are crucial to keeping people out of poverty and helping them to escape poverty. • They have also contributed to gains in health and education among beneficiaries and helped to reduce income inequality. • Transfers/Interventions are often too small or too short in duration to make a lasting difference in the lives of recipients. • Some social protection schemes can also reinforce exclusion. • Example: Disability benefits for persons of working age that are linked to their capacity to work can create disincentives for participating in the labor market and thereby perpetuate dependency. • Targeted transfers can result in improvements in income and overall economic wellbeing while, in some cases, generating community discord or inducing a sense of shame among recipients. • Progress towards meeting SDG targets should therefore be faster among individuals and population groups that are currently lagging behind—that is, gaps in well-being should be closing. • While there is ample evidence of the effects of social protection on well-being, the empirical literature says little about its impact on inequalities between social groups. • Not all individuals and social groups benefit equally from social protection systems. Inclusive social protection systems: policy implications • Social protection is but one of the policy tools needed to combat poverty and inequality, improve people’s wellbeing and facilitate the participation of individuals and groups that are excluded. • Measures to promote access to land, credit and other productive resources, to ensure equal access to housing, and to foster fair inheritance rights, full legal capacity and access to justice by poor women and men, are also critical for social inclusion. • Entitlement to contributory schemes is often conditional on participation in the formal labor market, putting them beyond the reach of some members of society. • First-time jobseekers, such as young people and recently arrived migrant workers, are unlikely to be covered by unemployment insurance. • Women, who bear a disproportionate share of unpaid care and domestic work, are less often covered by contributory schemes as well. • Embedding social protection programs in strong legal frameworks, as called for at the World Summit for Social Development, helps to secure long-term funding and institutional stability for a comprehensive social protection system (ILO, 2016e; Devereux, 2011). In contrast, absence of strong legal and institutional frameworks puts the political and fiscal sustainability of social protection programs at risk (Sepúlveda and Nyst, 2012; European Commission, 2015d). Changes in political priorities or fluctuations in external funding can pose a greater threat to programes that are not embedded in national legislation than those that Improving accessibility – complementing universal schemes with special measures • Even in a policy framework grounded in universalism, certain segments of the population face greater challenges than others in overcoming poverty and social exclusion. • Children, young people, older persons, persons with disabilities, international migrants and ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples face barriers to accessing even universal social protection schemes. • The effectiveness of conditions varies greatly depending on how and in what context conditional transfers are implemented. • Crucial factor for success is the existence of goodquality and appropriate public services (Barrientos and others, 2013). • Encouraging school attendance is unlikely to result in improved educational outcomes if there are no schools in the areas where potential beneficiaries live or if the quality of education is low. • Moreover, if employment prospects are poor, even improvements in health and education may fail to break the poverty cycle. • Social protection systems require strong coordination in order to be effective. • One institution must take charge of overall coordination. It must have the capacity to manage and implement a social protection system and enough political influence to secure resources and ensure that the system is prioritized. • Much can be done to simplify complex and lengthy administrative procedures, reduce paperwork and avoid overlapping systems. Procedures that require a high degree of literacy or time investment tend to exclude those who are most in need of support. • The role of intermediaries should also be curbed. They can make arbitrary decisions on who may or may not have access to support. • Lack of beneficiary participation in the design or delivery of a scheme results in unnecessary barriers to access. • Participation and consultation are critical to ensuring that such barriers are identified and removed. Providing sufficient benefits to ensure income security - Sustainable financing for social protection • A critical factor for the establishment and expansion of successful social protection systems is sustainable funding. • Social protection is usually financed from a combination of sources: tax and other revenue, contributions from employees and employers, private savings and—in some developing countries—development assistance. No “one size fits all” template for successful social protection systems. Common elements that can improve outcomes: Detailed and frequent monitoring and evaluation Close coordination of systems at the policy, program, and administrative levels. Adoption of a single registry management information Innovative outreach activities to improve access to services Strong governance and coordination among government agencies. Benefit portability to extend coverage to migrant workers The MARAWI Relief Effort “Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby declare Marawi City liberated from the terrorist influence that marks the beginning of the rehabilitation for the people.” - Pres. Rodrigo R. Duterte (Oct.17, 2017) Overview: The Siege of Marawi The Islamic City of Marawi is the capital of the province of Lanao del Sur, one of five provinces of the former Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM. With a population of around 201,785 (PSA, 2015), it is the largest urban center in the ARMM. It is a center of commercial activities and institutional services that attract many to find work and settle in the City. The siege of Marawi City is part of a prolonged conflict that has exacerbated the socio-economic conditions in the conflict-affected areas. Lanao del Sur has long been the epicenter of conflict between multiple groups and clans, often resulting from competition over access to and control of land and resources. Lanao del Sur has the highest incidence of poverty among all provinces in the Philippines: 71.9% of the population living below the annual per capita poverty threshold of about $442.8 (P22,802) in 2015 compared with 53.7% for the entire region of ARMM and 21.6% nationally. This extreme poverty combined with land dispossession, social exclusion, and constrained access to basic services exacerbated the long-standing conflicts, including the Bangsamoro struggle for self-determination, led by MILF and MNLF, and the struggle of the Communist Party of the Philippines-NPA. Task Force Bangon Marawi Administrative Order No. 3 established the TFBM. Post-Conflict Needs Assessment (PCNA) to inform the formulation of the Bangon Marawi Comprehensive Rehabilitation and Recovery Plan. National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC), through its secretariat, the Office of Civil Defense, coordinated the activities related to the PCNA. Human Impact Massive displacement of communities. Total of 369,196 individuals were displaced. Internally displaced persons (IDPs) were brought to emergency shelters; home-based arrangements. Casualties and injuries: Government reports 168 casualties from the government forces; 114 civilians; 270 unidentified individuals; and 924 from the rebel forces. Around 88 individuals were also reported missing by their relatives. Immediate Disaster Relief In response to the emergency needs of the IDPs, the Government has initially allocated $93.8 million (P5.0 billion) budget in over 100 shelters. Over 100 organizations, both local and international, have extended assistance to attend to the massive humanitarian needs of the displaced. National government agencies also mobilized to provide psycho-social and medical services to the IDPs. IDPs concerns: Unsatisfactory delivery of services in the evacuation centers Poor quality of facilities (e.g., limited comfort rooms, poor solid waste management, etc.) Non-issuance of disaster family access cards to extended families and single parents Irregular provision of health service to far-flung evacuation centers, and Non-equitable distribution of relief goods/assistance to families, regardless of size. Emergency shelters are also not designed to meet specific cultural needs, such as the segregation of males and females. Due to the large displacement caused by the siege, the internally displaced persons (IDPs) numbered to a total of 369,921 individuals (equivalent to around 77,170 families) 'Kambalingan'- a maranao term which means returning/ homecoming. The return date for the residents outside the 24 most affected barangays was made possible through the collaborative implementation of “Kambalingan “Kathanor”, an Internally Displaced Person (IDP) profiling with a biometric feature to identify bona fide displaced individuals, their original homes, their family members and the programs/services they have availed themselves of from the government and nongovernment interventions. KAWIYAGAN. A Maranao term means livelihood, TFBM Subcommittee on Business and Livelihood in partnership with humanitarian organizations provide livelihood assistance and business intervention to the displaced families of Marawi City affected by the siege.