Uploaded by aytrading247

412353810-The-corrupt-theatre-orchestrated-by-the-Banking-Cartel-and-Black-Nobility

advertisement
The World Bank
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
Tokyo Office
10F, Fukoku Seimei Building
2-2-2, Uchisaiwai-Cho
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, Japan
Telephone: (03) 3597 6650
Fax: (03) 3597 6695
Cable: INTBAFRAD TOKYO
Tuesday, June 4, 2019
------ Forwarded message --------From: Karen Hudes
Date: Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: Why did Australia risk its 'security' by interfering in the US presidential
election?
To: Susan Brown <subrown33@yahoo.com.au>
Dear Susan,
I will ask you whom you believe and why you believe them. All of what is written is
simply a hoax.
Australia's and all of the other countries' intelligence agencies are puppets, working for
the Bankers. There is no such thing as Australia's national security according to the
corrupt way things are operating until we clean them up.
As for your question about the elections. When the Constitution of Australia is not in
effect, and the government is simply a corporation, the elections are not legitimate.
Australia was not "interfering" in the United States elections, because these were bogus
as well.
Sincerely,
Karen Hudes
Acting General Counsel, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Overseer Mandate Trustee, Global Debt Facility, TVM-LSM-666
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:21 PM Susan Brown <subrown33@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Hi Karen,
I’m sending this to you for your perusal. This is an article via
the CItizens Electoral Council (CEC) whom are affiliated with LaRouche.
I can pick out some of the misinformation but you will undoubtedly be able to identify with more
than I.
Karen, apart from this article. I have a Question I would like answered.
1: If Australia is also in Interregnum, then why is it we have just had a Federal Election?
Against all the polls and odds, the encumbent party won another term. I’m wondering if this is
due to them already being the ‘Caretaker’ govt whom needed to be reinstated, or is it just
business as usual for the banking cartel?
I can’t figure much else out Karen. There is NOT ENOUGH INFO about Australia coming out
from you on details such as these and we need to gain perfect clarity.
Please take some thought on this when you get more time. I know you are dealing with such a
lot; not only on social media.
Kindest regards, Susan Brown.
From: CEC Media Release <cec@cecaust.com.au>
Date: 30 May 2019 at 10:20:29 am AWST
To: <subrown33@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Why did Australia risk its 'security' by interfering in the US presidential election?
Reply-To: <cec@cecaust.com.au>
Click here to recommend this to your friends
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release Thursday, 30 May 2019
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 1800 636 432
Email: cec@cecaust.com.au
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au
Why did Australia risk its ‘security’ by
interfering in the US presidential election?
The following release is an article by Robert Barwick in the 29 May 2019 Australian Alert
Service, the weekly magazine of the Citizens Electoral Council. It questions the national security
implications for Australia of the Trump administration’s investigation of Australia’s, specifically
Alexander Downer’s, role in providing the intelligence pretext for the FBI wiretaps on the
Trump campaign on the now-disproven suspicion of collusion between the Trump campaign and
Russia. It is remarkable how quiet the Australian government and media are being about this.
Not mentioned in the following article is this reminder about Downer, which proves he is not
above spying on Australia’s “friends”: in 2004, as Foreign Minister Downer was in charge of
the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), the Australian branch of MI6, when it planted
bugs in the Timor-Leste cabinet room to eavesdrop on the Timor-Leste government’s
deliberations about their negotiations with Australia over the rights to oil in the Timor Sea.
Negotiation transcripts show Downer was trying to bully the Timorese, the poorest country on
earth, into mostly giving up their oil claims. Former ASIS officer Witness K, who blew the
whistle on this operation, said he decided to come forward after Downer took a highly-paid job
as a consultant with Woodside Petroleum, which was the beneficiary of the treaty Downer
negotiated. The government’s ongoing cover-up of the Timor-Leste spying scandal, and
prosecution of the whistleblower, speaks to the nefarious abuse of secrecy in intelligence
operations. It is increasingly clear that this extends into Australia’s participation in the Five
Eyes intelligence partnership, which, as the evidence known so far indicates, mobilised in 2016
to sabotage the possibility that in the 2016 presidential election the American people might
democratically back a change of US foreign policy in relation to Russia and regime-change
wars.
The cornerstone of Australia’s national security is its alliance with the United States. Beginning
in World War II, the alliance continued and strengthened during the Cold War. Post-Cold War it
has, if anything, intensified, with Australia participating in every US regime-change intervention,
and taking a leading role in the diplomatic attacks on the USA’s chief rivals, Russia and China.
Then-Prime Minister John Howard’s ultimate justification for Australia’s participation in the
illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq was to honour the US alliance on which our security depended. The
attachment to the US alliance has become so intense that two former prime ministers, the late
Malcolm Fraser and Paul Keating, have both criticised Australia’s lack of foreign policy
independence—Fraser described Australia’s alliance partners, the USA and UK, in the title of his
2014 book as Dangerous Allies.
It should therefore be highly alarming to the Australian government that the President of the
United States now views Australia not as a close ally, but with suspicion, due to the role of
Australia’s intelligence agencies in spying on his 2016 election campaign. It should also be
concerning that President Trump has ordered his Attorney General to include Australia, as well
as the UK, in his investigation of the fabrication of the so-called “Russiagate” hoax. What is
strange, however, but also revealing, is that nobody in the Australian government or the
mainstream state and corporate media are really talking about the national security implications
of this scandal.
The role of Australia in establishing the Russiagate hoax hinges on former Foreign Affairs
Minister Alexander Downer. The AAS reported on Downer’s curious participation in a 10
January 2018 article entitled, “What has five eyes and wears fishnet stockings? The Australian
link in the British intelligence operation to sabotage US-Russia cooperation”. In May 2016
Downer, then Australia’s High Commissioner to London, met with then 28-year-old Trump
campaign associate George Papadopoulos in the Kensington Wine Bar for drinks. Downer
claims that Papadopoulos informed him that the Russian government had thousands of hacked
Hillary Clinton emails that would damage her campaign. Downer said he passed this information
on to Australia’s intelligence agencies at the time, which subsequently passed it on to US
intelligence. “That’s just the end of the story; there’s nothing else to it”, Downer told the ABC’s
Matt Bevan in a 22 May interview for his podcast, “Russia, if you’re listening”. (Bevan’s
podcast is alone among Australian mainstream media in reporting on this in detail.)
We now know that Downer’s information, along with the infamous dossier fabricated by former
MI6 officer Christopher Steele, was instrumental in the FBI getting FISA warrants to spy on the
Trump campaign. This set in train the Russiagate scandal that led to Special Counsel Robert
Mueller’s investigation of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, which derailed
most of Trump’s first two years as president, but which found no evidence of collusion. Now the
tables have turned, and Russiagate is being investigated as a hoax. The worry for Australian and
British intelligence is that there is more to it than Downer admits, the revelation of which could
be very damaging to the Five Eyes intelligence partnership, but beneficial to global relations.
Certainly George Papadopoulos is saying that there is more to it than Downer admits. Having
gone to prison for a fortnight for falling into a perjury trap set by Mueller, Papadopoulos has
recognised that his encounter with Downer was central to the way Russiagate unfolded, and has
had time to piece together the sequence of events around it. Significantly, he claims that he did
not tell Downer that the Russians had Hillary’s emails, and that Downer was spying on him, the
implication being that it was to fabricate intelligence.
In April 2016, prior to his meeting with Downer, Papadopoulos was encouraged to meet with
Professor Joseph Mifsud, who was widely described in the Russiagate media reporting as having
intelligence links to Russia. The opposite was true, as the US Congress established after much
investigation; former US House Judiciary Committee chairman Devin Nunes, who conducted the
investigation, insisted on Fox News on 5 May 2019: “Mifsud has an awful lot of ties to US,
British, and Italian intelligence services”—i.e. the agencies that were actively opposed to
Trump’s foreign policy. It was Mifsud who told Papadopoulos that the Russians had Hillary’s
emails. If, as Papadopoulos insisted, he didn’t pass this information on to Downer, it is clear that
he was supposed to, so that Downer could report it had come from a Trump campaign official, to
establish a basis for collusion, which Downer did anyway.
Everything else that is known about Downer and the Kensington meeting would confirm
Papadopoulos’s suspicions. Downer denied to Matt Bevan Papadopoulos’s claim that he said he
knew all about him, but admitted that the Israeli embassy “suggested” the meeting, then
hurriedly insisted the Israelis didn’t “organise” it. Israeli intelligence is very close to its US and
British counterparts. Downer himself is deeply connected into British intelligence. As the AAS
reported:
“As foreign minister he had been in charge of Australia’s MI6, the Australian Secret Intelligence
Service (ASIS). ASIS agents, who are usually recruited from the diplomatic corps, where indeed
Downer started his career, are known to refer to Canberra as ‘home office’ and MI6 headquarters
in London as ‘head office’. ASIS and Australia’s other intelligence agencies are part of the Five
Eyes intelligence sharing alliance with the UK, USA, New Zealand and Canada; the popularised
terms ‘deep state’ and ‘secret state’ refer to these interconnected intelligence agencies. After
leaving politics, Downer stayed involved in this intelligence world. In 2008 he joined the
advisory board of secretive British firm Hakluyt & Co., a private intelligence company founded
by ‘former’ officers of MI6. … Downer resigned from Hakluyt & Co. when he was appointed
High Commissioner in 2014, but has continued to attend group functions. Today the
international advisory board of Hakluyt & Co. includes Sir Iain Lobban, the former director of
GCHQ, the UK’s top and most secretive intelligence agency.”
Downer’s own words, from his interview with Matt Bevan, are revealing of his orientation to the
Five Eyes apparatus. First he tried to ridicule the idea of a conspiracy, saying, “This sort of idea
that there is a kind of ASIS, ASIO, MI6, MI5, FBI, CIA, Ukrainian government or something
like that, some conspiracy to bring down the Trump administration … it’s a little bit sad.” Except
that the list of intelligence agencies he gave is a very good description of the Five Eyes
partnership, which in the next breath he declared his loyalty to: “If people tell me things like that,
which I think are damaging to Western security interests, particularly to the security interests of
the Five Eyes countries, expect me, Alexander Downer, former foreign minister of Australia, to
be supporting Western interests against Russian intelligence. You can count on me.” In 9 May
interview with Andrew Bolt on Sky News, Downer described himself as “part of the Five Eyes
intelligence community” and a “warrior for the Western alliance”.
The evidence is that British intelligence opposed Trump’s stated desire to improve relations with
Russia, and acted pre-emptively to undermine it, using assets including Alexander Downer and
Christopher Steele. This was the real “interference” in the US election, but it has now backfired,
and as a result Australia’s shadowy intelligence relationships with the Five Eyes apparatus are
now in the spotlight. These relationships are implicated in everything from the 1975 dismissal of
the democratically-elected Whitlam Labor government, to our involvement in regime-change
wars based on lies, to the dangerous escalation of tensions against Russia and China. The
Australian intelligence agencies and those who are determined to keep Australia dependent on
the USA for security will be panicked, but to those who want Australia to have an independent
foreign policy, this scrutiny is well overdue.
https://twitter.com/KarenHudes,
https://www.facebook.com/karen.hudes.10/
On Tuesdays at 7:00 pm EST http://dctv.org/Live
https://www.youtube.com/user/KarenHudes/videos
www.kahudes.net
interviews: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Bibliography1.pdf
Download