1. Update methodology based on comments
2. Update discussion based on comments
3. Edit results
a. Remake maps by colour
b. Accessibility map: Change the grey – as you use grey for “missing” data in
your other maps…? Maybe change your missing data grey to a dashed
pattern or something?
c. Run holistic analysis for all food outlets
d. Summarise
e. Reorganise
4. Devise index
a. Add section in methodology
5. Add conclusion statement that is a call to arms
Questions
 Choice of fonts!
 Need to include QGIS .qz files or whatever as ‘proof of QGIS’?
o Put a readme file in. In it, explains which scripts do what, a quick data section
or a data descriptor table.
o Figure x and Figure y were made from administrative data downloaded
 _ visualises the accessibility of food outlets to each residence at a radius of 1km.
Residences with highest accessibility to hawker centres are mostly located in the
central region, with another cluster farther north in Toa Payoh.
o Can highlight just one anomaly
o Given enough reference info in front to double check if reading the map
correctly
 No affordability data for Outram and Tanglin – Imputation of missing data - Should I
do this only for the Index or include in the affordability map as well? OR remove
completely from Index creation?
 Sense check the index results
 Where to put policy implications?
o Opportunites for future research and what should they lead to. Can
reference policy ina single sentence
 In ‘results’, do I still need the bar plots?
 In ‘results’ and ‘discussion’, should I be name dropping PAs?
Should I label anomalies?
Don’t use divergent palette for Foodscape Index map
 Yellow to Green to go for darker green
 Green she likes it, quite a cheery colour
 Red always signifies danger; best to focus on positivity
Underline ‘Regions’ and ‘Planning areas’ within the legend