Uploaded by sarabista27

SOCIAL DISTANCE MEASUREMENT

advertisement
Experiment no 2: To measure the social attitude of
Brahmin and Chhetri ethnic group towards Dalit by
using Borgadus Social Distance scale
Introduction
• This study has been conducted so as to measure the social attitude of
Brahmin and Chhetri ethnic group towards Dalit by using Borgadus
Social Distance Scale . It has the following sub topics ;
Background of the topic
• Social attitude refers to the negative or positive evaluation of social or ethnic groups in the society
• According to Dockey and Bedian, social attitude is a behavior pattern , anticipatory tendency, predisposition
to specific adjustment or more simply a conditioned response to stimuli.
• Brahmin and Chhetri are regarded as high caste ethnic group that comprises 12.2% and 16.6% respectively
whereas Dalit is regarded as low caste ethnic group that comprises 13.03%
• Dalit being below of the all caste have to face various problems because of the prejudice and negative social
attitude towards them. We can take example from the “Soti incident”. The group of 18 people went to fetch
the girl Sushma Parajuli. Sushma Parajuli and Nabaraj Bk had been in relation about three years. Nabaraj
Bk including 17 other went to Rukum to take the girl. However, the dead bodies of two men including
Nabaraj Bk was found . According to villagers, the incident occurred due to difference in caste . Sushma
Parajuli was of high caste Brahmin whereas Nabaraj Bk was of low caste Dalit.
• In terms of martial relations, Brahmin , Chhetri and even other castes are strictly not allowed to marry Dalit
people. They have the negative social evaluation towards Dalit.
• Not only in terms of martial relations but also in job opportunities, educational sector they are backward
Review of the topic
• According to the survey conducted by Dalit Human Organization,
there is undervalued representation in the census data of Dalit
population
• According to source of Wikipedia, “Soti incident” occurred due to the
difference in caste between the girl and the boy. The boy Nabharaj Bk
was of low caste Dalit and the girl Sushma Parajuli was of high caste
Brahmin.
• According to Feminist Dalit Organization(FEDO), Dalit women are
exploited sexually, refused to enter any kind of public temples, tea
shops ,schools and denied the use of public wells and taps.
Objective
• The main objective of this study is to find out the social evaluation of
Brahmin and Chhetri towards Dalit group.
• This study is broadly focused on the martial relations between high
caste and low caste.
• This study helps to determine how the society evaluates low caste
people when it comes to keep them close in afamily.
Method
• The participants were asked some of the questions through the
survey. The data was gathered in the following ways;
Description
• Total number of 10 participants were asked questions. Four of them
were Brahmins , Four of them were Chhetri and two of them were
Newars.
• They were selected for this study because it favors the topic of the
study.
Description of test measures
• Ten number of questions were asked to the participants through survey by
using Borgadus Social Distance Scale
• Borgadus Scale: Emory Borgadus had developed this scale. It is a social
distance measure to identify an individuals attitude toward different
groups. There are different attitude scores for different groups. People
can be compared on their prejudice behavior from their score. It can be
used to measure attitude toward objects also.
• The main purpose of this scale is to measure the attitude towards a
particular racial group. The scale is measured by the closeness of
relationship that a respondent is willing to accept. Borgadus scale usually
applied to the study of ethnic relations, social classes, and social values.
Procedure
• Ethical consideration: The information about this study by the
participants was given in a convenient manner. They were given a
clear explanations and hence it was conducted on the basis of their
acceptance . The study and research was done by ensuring them that
their name will not be exposed and they can write letters A,B instead
of their names.
Testing Procedure
• When I first told about my project work they were quite hesitant
about it. I explained about them a little longer. It took about 3 to 4
minutes to them to finish the survey.
• Introspective Report: When the participants were asked about their
feelings and thoughts during the survey their common answers were
they were nervous about it at first however when the other questions
followed they were quite comfortable with it.
Result
• The participants were given to tick the questions each for Brahmin, Chhetri, Magar ,Dalit
and Newars.
• Chhetri got 6 points for to close kinship by marriage, 3 points for to club as my friend, 1
point for to citizenship in my country
• Brahmin got 3 points for to close kinship by marriage and to citizenship in my country, 1
for to my street as my neighbor and to visitor only to my country , 2 for to my close as my
personal friend.
• Magar got 1 points for to close kinship by marriage, 3 for to club as my personal friend,
to my street as my neighbor and to employment in my occupation.
• Dalit got 1 point for to close kinship by marriage ,3 to club as my personal friend , 4
points to street as my neighbor 1 for to employment in my occupation and 1 for to visitor
in my country.
• Newar got 2 points for to close kinship by marriage 1 for to club as my close friend, 3
points to my street as my neighbor and to visitor only to my country and 1 for to
citizenship in my country.
Discussion and Conculsion
Chhetri and Brahmin got more points for to close kinship by marriage
whereas Dalit got less points for to close kinship by marriage. The
theory of this report suggests that Brahmin and Chhetri have negative
social evaluation towards Dalit.
Hence, the result of this finding supports the theory of this report.
Since, Dalit got only 1 point for to close kinship by marriage it clarifies
that Dalit people are kept at distance when it comes in martial relation.
Download