Uploaded by Mary McGarrity

George Washington 3

advertisement
McGarrity 1 of 7
Mary McGarrity
George Washington: The Right Choice for the Revolution
The Second Continental Congress began preparing for the inevitable war as the British
army increased its forces by almost five thousand during 1775. On June 15, there was a unanimous decision among the delegates to appoint George Washington, the delegate hailing from
Virginia, to command all the continental forces.1 There were many motivations for choosing
Washington for this post; however, his health history may have made him the perfect appointee.
Although the British and their Loyalists were the stated opponent, the constant task of keeping
the militia healthy was just as essential a fight as any battle. Some of the nation's earliest recorded programs promoting health in the United States were those enacted regarding military troops
during the Revolutionary War. Because soldiers were more likely to die of infections caused by
communicable diseases and bacterial contaminations, a plan needed to be directed and carried
out by a commander with the authority to prevent and avoid these situations.
Is having survived smallpox what made George Washington the perfect appointee for
commanding the continental army's general based upon his health history? No, but in combination with his family's mediocre lifespan, he was influenced by the Enlightenment philosophers,
believing in science over religion, and he had his episodes of illness and disease, which shaped a
well-rounded attitude on the subject. Author Jeanne E. Abrams states of Washington's understanding of medicine, "...he appreciated both the value of preventative health measures and the
need for prompt medical intervention for sickness".2 He wanted to live longer and read extensively on science and medicine subjects but was friends with the top physicians of his time, like
Drs. James Craik and Benjamin Rush.3
1
Risjord, Norman K. 2002. Jefferson's America, 1760-1815. p. 122
2 Abrams,
Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. p.78
3 Abrams,
Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine.
McGarrity 2 of 7
George was born of his father's second marriage in Wakefield, Virginia, on February 22,
1732. He was the first of the children in the second marriage and the fifth of his father's ten children. Washington had his bouts with malaria, pleurisy, influenza, and dysentery throughout life,
in addition to the more severe afflictions suffered in his youth.4 In his youth, it is assumed that
he had survived both the measles and the mumps because he did not get the diseases later in life
when he was exposed.5 Washington's father died at forty-eight, and he outlived all his siblings
leading him to say, "though I was blessed with a good constitution, I was of a short-lived
family".6 The belief that Washington's father and the males in the family had a paternal predisposition to tuberculosis led young George's fixation on moderation and stoicism to live a long
life.7 Perhaps Washington's preoccupation with illness and the depression that would come with
such a preoccupation caused him to be conscious of the troops' health when he said, "The General has nothing more at heart than the Health of the Troops".8
It may have been a trip to Barbados in 1751 with his brother Lawrence that gave him the
most perspective on diseases relevant to the war. The trip's purpose was to go to a more temperate climate to ease the coughing and congestion associated with Lawrence's consumption. Consumption, now known as tuberculosis, was thought to be hereditary and possibly alleviated by a
climate change more suitable to the individual, most often seaside or mountainside.9 Shortly after the Washington brothers arrived in Barbados, they were invited to the home of Gedney Clarke
on November 3. However, George wrote of his hesitation to go, "We went, --myself with some
reluctance, as the smallpox was in his family."10 For the next two weeks, George and Lawrence
were active members of the Barbados social life, when on November 17, the smallpox infection
4
Ibid p. 34
5
Ibid p. 35
6
Ibid p. 35
7
Ibid p. 34
8
Ibid p. 33
9
Fenn, Elizabeth A. 2002. Pox Americana. p. 13
10
Fenn, Elizabeth A. 2002. Pox Americana. p. 14
McGarrity 3 of 7
hit George with wrath.11 The seventeen-year-old George survived smallpox and returned to Virginia with a pockmarked face and lifelong immunity from Variola. From his personal experience
with smallpox came the perspective of how bad smallpox could render the afflicted and for how
long.
Smallpox had been of epidemic proportion in the colonies throughout the 1700s. However, the repeated outbreaks of 1721, 1752, 1764, and 1775 were especially severe in Boston. In
the 1700s, the only preventative act people could take for smallpox was inoculation, though it
was not without controversy. To inoculate a person, the person would have a small incision cut
in their skin, and discharge from the pus-filled scabs of a smallpox victim would be introduced in
the hope of getting a milder form, yet severe enough to make the individual immune. Smallpox
inoculation had been practiced in Greece, Armenia, and northern Africa for centuries before being introduced in Boston by Dr. Zabdiel Boylston during the 1721 epidemic. In response to an
inquiry on the efficacy of inoculation being used as a preventative of death, Benjamin Franklin
responded, in 1759, "that among 5059 un-inoculated white people, 452 had died (a death rate of
8.9%), whereas among 1974 inoculated individuals, only 23 (1.2%) had died. The corresponding
mortality rates among blacks were 12.8% and 5.0%, respectively".12 There were strict rules and
laws in the states that permitted the inoculation procedure to prevent outbreaks caused by the inoculations.13
The scourge of smallpox was such a factor for Washington's army in the Canada and Boston campaigns that he saw the need for addressing it during a time of war (Becker 2004).14 The
British troops had mostly been exposed during childhood while in Britain. However, they would
inoculate when the need arose since it was not a large scale operation like what had to happen for
the Patriots, who had no immunity. For Washington to inoculate his troops, it would put the
11
Ibid p. 14
12
Hasselgren, Per-Olof. 2020. "The Smallpox Epidemics In America In The 1700S And The Role Of The Surgeons:
Lessons To Be Learned During The Global Outbreak Of COVID-19". World Journal Of Surgery 44 (9): 2837-2841.
13
Becker, Ann. 2004. "Smallpox In Washington's Army: Strategic Implications Of The Disease During The American Revolutionary War".
14
Ibid
McGarrity 4 of 7
colonists at a disadvantage. However, he had decided to inoculate as written in his correspondence to Dr. William Shippen Jr. on January 6, 1777.15 From January to March 1777, the Continental Army was at a disadvantage with many of the troops undergoing inoculation. Strategically the decision to inoculate was a crucial one. As historian Dr. Ann Becker writes, "Washington's
desire to have an army healthy and ready to fight...explains his insistence on having the inoculations done as soon as possible...". 16
Washington had the foresight to understand that without defeating the unrelenting spread
of smallpox amongst his militia, he would never defeat the British, therefore developing and enforcing a program for inoculation was essential. George Washington saw the need and began
programs to keep diseases and contaminations from collapsing troop encampments. He issued
directives on camp hygiene, both the soldiers' hygiene and sanitation, as evidenced in one of his
first directives on July 4, 1775.17 One read, "All officers are required and expected to pay diligent Attention to keep their Men neat and clean . . . and inculcate upon them the necessity of
cleanliness".18 He went on to say, "They are also to take care that necessarys [latrines] be provided in the camps".19 Washington's statement is most interesting because it confers his belief that
fecal matter may have something to do with disease spread.
Smallpox was not the only threat to health during the revolution. At that time, fevers
were believed to be the result of bad air (miasmas) or humor imbalances. The term fever was
broad for any illness with a fever, though it may have been one of many diseases.20 Fevers were
caused by insects, bacteria, contaminated food and water, and crowded living conditions.
Washington had joined the Virginia militia and risen to the ranks to lieutenant-colonel in
1754 when he fought for the British against the French's infiltrations into the area. The military
15
Becker, Ann. 2004. "Smallpox In Washington's Army: Strategic Implications Of The Disease During The American Revolutionary War".
16
Ibid
17 Wilcox,
Lynne S. 2005. "Preventing Chronic Disease: Special Issue, November 2005: 05_0134". Cdc.Gov
18
Ibid
19
Ibid
20
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution". Journal Of The American Revolution.
McGarrity 5 of 7
camps were over-crowded, and the unhygienic conditions led to sickness and disease among the
troops, not sparing Washington and those of rank.21
Though the thinking was that imbalances in the bodily fluids caused illnesses, correspondences show that there may have been thoughts that camp overcrowding may be involved. Dr.
Benjamin Rush wrote of his concerns on overcrowding in December of 1777 to General Washington that "Too many sick are crouded together in One house. I have seen 20 sick men in One
room ill with fevers & fluxes, large eno' to contain only 6 or 8 well men without danger to their
health".22 Washington's faith in doctors conjugated with his unacknowledged personal experience with an infectious disease may have precipitated the second portion of his July 4, 1775 directive, which read, "They are also to take care that necessarys [latrines] be provided in the
camps".23 Washington's statement is most interesting because it confers his belief that fecal matter may have something to do with disease spread. This connection between cause and effect,
though not acknowledged as the causation for disease, was essential.
Washington's ability to see the need for a plan in addressing the military health and the
understanding of when to take action made him an essential leader for the tasks that were to
present themselves as the war pressed on. The programs he instilled in the military were for the
common good of the militia and the nation.
21 Abrams,
22
Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. p. 39
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution". Journal Of The American Revolution.
23 Wilcox,
Lynne S. 2005. "Preventing Chronic Disease: Special Issue, November 2005: 05_0134". Cdc.Gov.
McGarrity Page 1 of
FOOTNOTES
1.
Risjord, Norman K. 2002. Jefferson's America, 1760-1815. p. 122
2.
Abrams, Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. p.78
3.
Ibid
4.
Ibid p.34
5.
Ibid, p.35
6.
Ibid, p.35
7.
Ibid, p.34
8.
Ibid, p.33
9.
Fenn, Elizabeth A. 2002. Pox Americana. p. 13
10.
Ibid, p.14
11.
Ibid, p.14
12.
Hasselgren, Per-Olof. 2020. "The Smallpox Epidemics In America In The 1700s
And The Role Of The Surgeons: Lessons To Be Learned During The
Global Outbreak Of COVID-19".
World Journal Of Surgery 44 (9): 2837-2841.
13.
Becker, Ann. 2004. "Smallpox In Washington's Army: Strategic Implications Of
The Disease During The American Revolutionary War".
14.
Ibid
15.
Ibid
16.
Ibid
17.
Wilcox, Lynne S. 2005. "Preventing Chronic Disease: Special Issue,
November 2005: 05_0134". Cdc.Gov
18.
Ibid
19.
Ibid
20.
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution".
Journal Of The American Revolution.
21.
Abrams, Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. p. 39
22.
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution".
Journal Of The American Revolution.
23.
Wilcox, Lynne S. 2005. "Preventing Chronic Disease: Special Issue,
November 2005: 05_0134". Cdc.Gov.
McGarrity Page 1 of
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abrams, Jeanne E. 2013. Revolutionary Medicine. New York: New York University Press.
Becker, Ann. 2004. "Smallpox In Washington's Army: Strategic Implications Of The Disease
During The American Revolutionary War". Jstor. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3397473.
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution". Journal Of The American
Revolution. https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/11/fever/.
Burdick, Kim. 2015. "Fever - Journal Of The American Revolution". Journal Of The American
Revolution. https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/11/fever/.
Fenn, Elizabeth A. 2002. Pox Americana. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hasselgren, Per-Olof. 2020. "The Smallpox Epidemics In America In The 1700S And The Role
Of The Surgeons: Lessons To Be Learned During The Global Outbreak Of
COVID-19". World Journal Of Surgery 44 (9): 2837-2841.
Risjord, Norman K. 2002. Jefferson's America, 1760-1815. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md.: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers.
Wilcox, Lynne S. 2005. "Preventing Chronic Disease: Special Issue, November 2005:
05_0134". Cdc.Gov. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/nov/05_0134.htm.
Download