Sept 2014
FSW Online Course Evaluation Form
Dear External Reviewer,
Thank you for evaluating this online/blended course and ensuring its quality prior to delivery to students. The TIFDOL
Design Team requests that you function on two levels:
1) Evaluate how effectively this course fulfills course outcomes and prepares students for the next course in
their course sequence, and
2) Put the course through its paces by playing the role of the student in taking every quiz, test, submitting fake
assignments, opening links and files, etc.
Your thorough efforts now avoid future problems for multiple instructors and students, plus improve course effectiveness
and satisfaction.
Thank you for your time and feedback.
Design Team
Teaching Innovation, Faculty Development, and Online Learning Division
Your contact information:
Name
Title
Email
Banner ID #
Phone number
CRN and Course Name that you are evaluating:
RATING SCALE QUESTIONS
The following questions use a rating scale of 5=strong, 1=weak, and 0=N/A.
Resources:
Rate this course for the quality of its resources:
0 Text
0 Supplemental readings
0 Multimedia
0 Tutorials
0 Case studies
0 Other
Engagement:
Rate the extent to which the course design supports interaction and engagement. For example,
in addition to requiring students to interact with the instructor, are mastery elements included
to lend greater value to discussions? Do instructional activities require students to collaborate
and is this collaboration supported by technologies exceeding text-only?
0 Instructor-student interaction
0 Student-student interaction
0 Student-content interaction
Please explain your interaction and engagement scores.
Usability:
Did you find the course easy to use? Consider its consistency of design, organization, and
intuitiveness.
0 Consistency of design
0 Organization
0 Intuitiveness
Please explain your usability scores.
Academic rigor:
Rate this course on the appropriateness of its overall academic rigor and cognitive load.
0 Overall academic rigor
0 Cognitive load per module/activity
0 Scaffolding
Please explain your academic rigor score.
ERROR CHECK
The purpose of the following grid is to checkmark areas in which you discovered errors. Since different
courses have different numbers of modules, the matrix might be wider than you need; in which case,
disregard the extra fields.
MODULE #
Intro
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Overview
Learning
Activities
Assignments
Discussions
Quizzes
Tests
Multimedia
Other
FINAL COMMENTS AND COURSE RATING
Please use this space to make any other comments about the course to improve its quality and
effectiveness before it is distributed.
Does this course cover everything that you would expect it to cover given its place in the program?
Would you enjoy being a student in this course? Please explain.
Midterm
Final
Assign an overall rating for this course (check one):
Exemplary:
This course exceeded my
expectations and provides a
rich learning environment.
Students will appreciate the
thoughtfully crafted learning
experiences and assessments
that foster mastery learning,
engagement, and higher
order thinking. This course
meets all program outcomes;
links to outcomes are
embedded in assessments to
provide feedback to the
department.
Accomplished:
Rather than a repetitive readquiz-test sequence, this
course intersperses engaging
learning activities and
supports students in their
synthesis of concepts. This
course meets all program
outcomes; links to outcomes
may be present in
assessments.
Acceptable:
This is the minimum score
needed for the course to be
launched. This course
provides a complete and
error-free framework for
instructors. It is logically
organized and intuitive. The
course is of the appropriate
academic rigor and meets all
program outcomes.
Needs
improvement:
After several corrections, the
course could be released.
This course might be missing
some critical components,
contain errors, require only
lower-order thinking, or not
meet program outcomes.
Recommended
for redesign:
This course does not meet
program outcomes and/or is
too problematic for release.
Please sign, scan and email this form to the Director of Design and Development when completed. Your
stipend payment will then be processed. Thank you for providing valuable feedback to the development
team.
Signature______________________________________________Date___________________________