Zero Your Account
Here's an interesting article about getting refund of our credit
that we extend to the US inc. That 1099 method of cancelling
civil cases is particularly interesting.
Zero Your Account
"A Question of Philosophy
A few years ago, we were employing IRS Form 1099-OID by
naming the straw party as the “Recipient” and the de facto entity
as the Payer. Roger Elvick used that very method in the case that
landed him in prison. More recently, the Zero Your Account
(“ZYA”) method for bringing the Individual Master File / social
security record to a zero balance has employed the OID form by
naming the straw party as “Payer” and the de facto entity as
“Recipient.” And even more recently, a method which uses a
1099-A which names the straw party as the Lender in
conjunction with a 1099-OID which names the straw party as
the recipient has appeared and, as of this writing, has shown
promise for resolving Court cases and providing a substantial
return of funds to the Source (the living Man/Woman).
PHILOSOPHY OF ZYA
The philosophy of ZYA is simple. Living men have prepaid the
entire de facto concoction with the loss of the Land in 1865 and
the transfer of all wealth to the United States Federal
Corporation and subjugation of free-holding rights in 1933. This
mega-pool of credit is used to fund the abomination and
production of all goods and services there under. The correct
economic model therefore for a simple retail purchase would be
to visit the store and have the value of the requisitioned goods
set-off against Our credit. But since it does not work that way,
since living Men are forced to “pay” for goods and services they
have already funded, we seek a refund of the “payment.” The
invoice or billing amount with which we are served is the fiction
value that is attributed to the amount of our credit that was used
to produce the good or service. Since U.S. Inc. paid nothing for
the gain and is charging us the invoice amount, that invoice
amount comprises the Original Issue Discount – the amount that
they will gain when we “pay” them minus the cost of the credit
to produce the good or service (which was $0.00).
In banking situations, we approach a licensed credit bearer
(bank) for the purpose of buying back our own goods – a house
or a car for instance. Since the bank claims to be “loaning” us
value of some sort, and we supplied all of that value when our
money was confiscated by deception in 1933 under the
Communist Roosefesto, in effect the bank is charging us for
access to our own credit. So we are injured twice – when we
purchase the car and when we pay the bank the usury rape tax.
Therefore, since the bank‟s investment was $0.00 and they are
making value equal to the principal and interest of the loan, the
Original Issue Discount is equal to the face value of the contract
plus any payments that were made.
Under ZYA, the author suggests that the OID amount is listed in
Box #1 and noted as a federal withholding in Box #4. Those
amounts are then transferred to the cover form, Form 1096.
Simple and neat.
Form 1096 is especially revealing because it asks, remarkably,
for the EIN and social security number of the filer which has
been interpreted to mean it is asking for information about the
living man‟s live account and the fiction‟s dead corporate
account, although implies that these boxes are provided to
accommodate individual OR corporate “filers.”
That total amount as listed on the 1096 is then transferred to
Lines 21, 22, 37, 38, 41 and 43 on IRS Form 1040 as Taxable
Income. And on the very next line, Line 44, the Tax on that
income is listed as $0.00 so that a refund of the full OID can be
sought on Line 74a (all lines from 2007 Form 1040). This is the
primary concern of those who are now using the older method as
they believe such a filing could lead to fraud charges or an audit.
Proponents of ZYA simply call attention to the following:
1. The tax is stated to be voluntary and is known to be selfassessing. A living man can elect to assess a zero amount.
2. The living man is not a corporation and hence not taxable.
Interestingly, the 1040 does NOT state “Your” Taxable Income.
It only states “Taxable Income” on Line 43. But on Line 63 the
form states: “This is your tax.”You admit to the tax. They get to
retain the gain.
3. The purpose of all of these filings is to present the distinction
between the living and straw parties. Form 1040 is being used to
identify withheld funds. Period.
4. Form 56 (see below).
PHILOSOPHY OF THE ORIGINAL METHOD
The philosophy of the original method is similar to the above as
far as pre-payment and being blocked from accessing our own
credit. However, in the original method, the tax on Line 43 is
completed by looking up the applicable tax on a tax table, and
then subtracting the tax from the OID to arrive at the applicable
refund.
PHILOSOPHY OF THE 1099-A METHOD
This method was designed by two very clever men who
researched IRS codes and regs (especially Publication 1212, 26
U.S.C. Secs. 1271 – 1275, and Chapter 33A of American
Jurisprudence 2d, pages 695 – 715. It is intended to identify the
living man as the “sponsor of the credit.” A 1099-A is used to
identify the court or bank as the borrower of funds that have
been abandoned. When U.S. Inc. failed to redeem the notes
which signified their debt to the Sovereigns (FRNS), the 1099-A
identifies the value of the case or original mortgage note as the
amount of the credit that has been abandoned. This is a simple
system in which a simple Affidavit of Original Issue with
Exhibits A and B (photocopy of Copy B of court‟s 1099-OID;
photocopy of Copy B of 1099-A) is filed in the case, with
another original sent to the Plaintiff/prosecutor with Exhibits A
and B (photocopy of Copy B of Plaintiff‟s 1099-OID;
photocopy of Copy B of 1099-A). It has succeeded in achieving
abandonment of all civil court cases in which it‟s been tired and
various refunds. CAUTION: DO NOT EXTRAPOLATE A
SILVER BULLET. Many such technologies have succeeded at
first and then been stone-walled.
WHICH OF THESE METHODS TO CHOOSE, however, is
less a function of any of the above information and more a
function of:
Faith in the Creator
And
Willingness to persevere
It has been suggested that the Secretary of the Treasury be
appointed as fiduciary for all tax and judicial matters (they are
the same issues by the way) on IRS Form 56. It is not the
method, but the Man that makes the difference. Only the man
can stand up and be counted:
“That‟s my understanding. Show me where I‟m wrong.”
“It‟s fraud? Don‟t you have a copy of Form 56? If I got it
wrong, why are you not correcting it?Do you not have the
authority?”
If a Sovereign living Man receives a Notice of Frivolous
Penalty, instead of crying or quitting or skulking away, he
recognizes this as a novation, a re-draft, a substitution of a new
contract for the old contract, and he celebrates by issuing a
corrected set of filings to institute a return of those additional
funds to the Source. Interest, fees and penalties? Who cares?
Here‟s another filing for return to the Source. It is his faith that
keeps him true to the Creator when others fold their cards, tuck
tail and run.
He knows that when you accede to Satan‟s promises, Satan will
then be able to control his every move.
A Sovereign living Man holds his ground and remains consistent
with his beliefs and his Faith regardless of the provocation or the
venue (commerce, common law, Constitution, Articles of
Confederation, Original jurisdiction). The venue other than
Original jurisdiction„s irrelevant. He knows the Lord said, “fear
not, nor be dismayed; to morrow go out against them: for the
LORD will be with you.” (Chronicles, 20:17). Therefore, when
a Sovereign man hears about the 1099-A method, he will NOT
run out and correct all of his ZYA returns, he will merely
continue to persevere.
Commerce is just another way of demonstrating who you are. So
is common law. So is abatement. So are declarations of political
status. So are David Clarence‟s removals. So are Keith
Edwards‟s Cancellatura documents. The pathway to freedom is
in you, my friends. Not on a piece of paper. None of us have
complete knowledge. That‟s the way they intend it. Satan does
not want to let us off the hook. It‟s what‟s in your heart that
matters, the strength of your faith, the commitment to
perseverance. Once you turn around, you are lost in the kingdom
of Satan from which there is no escape. This is what I believe."
Here's the Affidavit of original issue:
AFFIDAVIT%20OF%20ORIGINAL%20ISSUE.doc
http://www.freewebs.com/iamsiren/Misc%20Legal%20Docume
nts/AFFIDAVIT...
Plain Statement of Facts
1. Affiant is the agent for alleged Defendant JOHN H.
DOE©.
2. Alleged Defendant JOHN H. DOE© is the "Original
Issuer" of the credit on the debt instrument commonly
known and identified as Claim or Case No. 0108-XXXX in
THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE.
3. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE is a
corporation doing business under an unknown tax
identification number also known as THE EAST
OCEANSIDE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA located at 1234 River Avenue,
OCEANSIDE, CA 86851.
4. The Original Issue price of $20,289.92 for Claim or Case
No. 0108-XXXX was accepted on June 30, 2008, by THE
MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE and is
filed on Internal Revenue Service Form 1099-OID
(attached hereto and stated herein as alleged Defendant's
"Exhibit A").
5. Creditor JOHN H. DOE© accepted the Claim or Case No.
0108-XXXX on the attached Internal Revenue Service
Form 1099-OID (please see "Exhibit A") for the assessed
value of the taxes owed.
6. There being no controversy in THE EAST OCEANSIDE
MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA on Claim or Case No. 0108-XXXX, this
court does not have subject matter jurisdiction and must
vacate any order(s) or judgment(s) made.