D8.1 Deliverable 1.1: Detailed deployment scenarios for wave and tidal energy converters Scientific and Technical coordination Guidelines Hydraulics & Maritime Research Centre - University College Cork This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 608597 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios D1.1: Detailed Deployment Scenarios for wave and tidal energy converters Project: DTOcean - Optimal Design Tools for Ocean Energy Arrays Code: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Name Date 19/02/2014 Checked Work Package 1 & Work Package 9 Work Package 6 Approved Project Coordinator 27/02/2014 Prepared 24/02/2014 The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement No. 608597 (DTOcean). No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form – electronic, mechanical, photocopy or otherwise without the express permission of the copyright holders. This report is distributed subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired-out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 2 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios DOCUMENT CHANGES RECORD Edit./Rev. Date Chapters Reason for change A/0 New Document 27/01/2014 All Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 3 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Overall scope of the tools ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Scope for Wave ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Scope for Tidal ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Detailed Cross Cutting Scope Parameters for Wave and Tidal Design Tools.......................... 9 2.4 Specific Technology Type Input Details ................................................................................ 10 2.4.1 Wave ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.4.2 Tidal ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 3 4 Validation Scenarios...................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Validation Scenario 1 – North-west Lewis ............................................................................ 14 3.2 Validation Scenario 2 – Fair Head Tidal ................................................................................ 16 3.3 Validation Scenario 3 - Aegir Shetland Wave Farm .............................................................. 18 3.4 Validation Scenario 4 – WestWave ....................................................................................... 20 3.5 Validation Scenario 5 –Sound of Islay ................................................................................... 22 Overall Validation Scenarios ......................................................................................................... 24 4.1 5 Site Data Requirements ........................................................................................................ 13 Validation Scenario summary ............................................................................................... 24 References .................................................................................................................................... 25 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 4 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Figures Index Figure 1: Seabed fixed oscillating wave surge converter. Source: Aquaret.......................................... 10 Figure 2a: Point absorber. Source: Aquaret.......................................................................................... 11 Figure 3: Attenuator. Source: Aquaret. ................................................................................................ 12 Figure 4: Fixed horizontal axis tidal turbine. Source: Aquaret.............................................................. 12 Figure 5: Floating tidal turbine. Source: HydraTidal. ............................................................................ 13 Figure 6: Lewis wave scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. ....................... 14 Figure 7: Fair Head Tidal scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. ................. 16 Figure 8: Aegir Shetland Array scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. ........ 18 Figure 9: WestWave scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service......................... 20 Figure 10: Sound of Islay scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. ................. 22 Tables Index Table 1: Specific Scope Parameters. ....................................................................................................... 9 Table 2: Scenario 1 project summary table. ......................................................................................... 15 Table 3: Scenario 2 project summary table. ......................................................................................... 17 Table 4: Scenario 3 project summary table. ......................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Scenario 4 project summary table. ......................................................................................... 21 Table 6: Scenario 5 project summary table. ......................................................................................... 23 Table 7: Validation scenarios combined summary. .............................................................................. 24 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 5 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Abstract This report provides an overview of the setting of the overall scope for the functionality of the DTOcean design tools as well as outlining the 5 validation scenario’s which will be further used for the testing of the design tools developed during the DTOcean project. This report presents the overall scope and each of the validation projects, along with their specific location and detailed parameters which will be used for validation. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 6 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 1 Introduction The main goal of this report is to define the overall functionality and scope of the DTOcean tools and identify and describe the array development scenario’s that will be used for validation of the tools. This has two main functions: • • To provide the generic scope for the application and functionality of the design tools; and To identify relevant deployment validation scenarios. Additionally this report will • • • Provide technology specific input requirements. Characterise physical and environmental parameters at deployment locations. Produce a database of parameter values at selected sites for tool validation. To achieve these objectives, Deliverable 1.1 defines 5 different sites for wave and tidal energy array locations, which have been developed in conjunction with project developers and utilities already involved in the development of European ocean energy array projects. 3 of the locations chosen are considered for development of wave arrays, whilst the remaining 2 are targeted towards tidal array development. Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 are specific, 4 and 5 are generic. In addition to the variety of the validation scenarios, a number of technology types and array sizes have been identified. The validation scenarios presented within this document are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. North-west Lewis Fair Head Tidal Aegir-Shetland Wave Farm WestWave Scottish Power Sound of Islay The validation scenarios presented within this report will be used for testing of the design tools developed within the DTOcean project. It is expected that using a variety of sites and technologies will provide a comprehensive data suite that will allow for a robust validation of the tools. In addition to the variety of sites and technology types, the scenarios consider wave and tidal energy deployment at varying scales relevant to demonstration, pre-commercial deployment and fullcommercial deployment. . Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 7 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 2 Overall scope of the tools This section of the report will deal with setting the underpinning scope of the functionality of the tool. Initially, the scope has been split into 3 categories: • • • Wave/Tidal Deployment Location Technology type The details of the scope can then be fully generated from a summation of generic and cross cutting information. This information, in addition to detailed specific datasets will provide the information required for the full validation scenarios. 2.1 Scope for Wave In conjunction with the project development partners and the DTOcean Strategic Advisory Board the following scope decisions were made for the deployment location options and technology types for the wave energy functionality of the tools. Deployment location options to be considered 1. Open sea nearshore 2. Open sea offshore Technology types to be considered 1. Fixed device 2. Floating point absorber 3. Floating attenuator 2.2 Scope for Tidal In conjunction with the project development partners and the DTOcean Strategic Advisory Board the following scope decisions were made for the deployment location options and technology types for overall tidal energy functionality of the tools Deployment location options to be considered 1. Constrained channel, 2-20km wide 2. Headland flow open-ocean Technology types to be considered 1. Horizontal axis fixed-ducted or un-ducted 2. Floating 3. Vertical axis fixed Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 8 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 2.3 Detailed Cross Cutting Scope Parameters for Wave and Tidal Design Tools A project Workshop Meeting, which took place on 27th November 2013, enabled discussion between DTOcean project development partners about the detailed scope of the tool functionality. The parameters presented in Table 1 exhibit the details on the agreed specific lower and upper bounds of the tool. Later in this report, specific parameters for each validation site are also displayed. . Table 1: Specific Scope Parameters. Specific Scope Parameters Array Size (MW) ≤10-100 Water depth Tidal(m) 15-80 Water depth Wave(m) 12-200 Seabed Rock Rock with Sediment Single device rating (MW) Cable distance to shore (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Sand and Muddy Sand 100kW-3MW 0-50 0-2000 0-50 0-100 Additionally, specific technology information will be required for technology types that will be input into the generic location information and this is detailed in the following section of the report. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 9 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 2.4 Specific Technology Type Input Details The following section outlines the specific details needed for each technology types and will be necessary inputs for use of the tool by end-users. 2.4.1 Wave Seabed FIXED • Mass (for load-out) • Dimensions o Operation o Transportation • Power capture characteristic curve/matrix • Fixing options o Ballast o Drilled pins o Monopiles • Installation strategy and phase definition • O&M strategy • Electrical generator type o Converters within generator o On-board transformer requirements Figure 1: Seabed fixed oscillating wave surge converter. Source: Aquaret. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 10 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Wave- Point absorber • Seabed or surface reaction • Mass (for load-out and anchoring) • Dimensions o Operation o Transportation • Any Assembly required afloat • Power capture characteristic curve/matrix • Mooring System • Anchor/fixing system • Installation strategy and phase definition • O&M strategy • Footprint • Minimum device spacing • Electrical generator type o Converters within generator o On-board transformer requirements Figure 2a: Point absorber. Source: Aquaret. Figure 2b: Floating point absorber. Source: OPT. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 11 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Wave attenuator • Mass (for load-out and anchoring) • Dimensions o Operation o Transportation • Power capture characteristic curve/matrix • Mooring System • Anchor/fixing system • Installation strategy and phase definition • O&M strategy • Footprint • Electrical generator type o Converters within generator o On-board transformer requirements 2.4.2 Tidal Tidal Sea based (horizontal/vertical axis) • Mass (for load-out) • Dimensions o Operation o Transportation • Depth as % of diameter • Minimum tip clearance • Operating window & power curve/matrix • Fixation options o Ballast o Drilled pins o Monopiles • Foundation loads • Installation strategy and phase definition • O&M strategy • Footprint including min seabed footprint gradient • Minimum lateral and longitudinal spacing • Electrical generator type o Converters within generator o On-board transformer requirements Figure 3: Attenuator. Source: Aquaret. Figure 4: Fixed horizontal axis tidal turbine. Source: Aquaret. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 12 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Tidal floating • Mass (for load-out and moorings) • Dimensions o Operation o Transportation • Depth as % of diameter (may be different than fixed) • Operating window & power curve/matrix • Fixation/mooring • Installation strategy and phase definition • Footprint • O&M strategy • Spacing • Electrical generator type o Converters within generator o On-board transformer requirements Figure 5: Floating tidal turbine. Source: HydraTidal. 2.5 Site Data Requirements In addition to technology and location information, the following characterisation data will be taken into consideration when developing the functionality of the tools. These data sets will be further developed throughout WP1, specifically in D1.2: • • • • • • • Metocean – wind wave tidal, near-shore and offshore Geophysics / Geotechnics Bathymetry Competing uses –shipping, fishing Environmental constraints (SACs, etc.) Electrical Landfall Characteristics Port and service base Information Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 13 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 3 Validation Scenarios The 5 validation scenarios presented in this section will be utilised as a way to evaluate, validate and test different functionality within the tools. Each specific project site, which cover a comprehensive range of the parameters identified in Table 1, are described throughout this section. 3.1 Validation Scenario 1 – North-west Lewis Aquamarine Power, with industry partners Scottish and Southern Energy and ABB Technology Ventures, are intending to develop a near-shore 40MW site on the north-western side of the island of Lewis, in the western Hebrides, Scotland. It is intended that Aquamarine Power will deploy an array of Aquamarine Oyster devices. Figure 6: Lewis wave scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 14 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table 2: Scenario 1 project summary table. Validation Scenario 1 – Summary Table Project information Name North-west Lewis Location Technology Aquamarine Oyster Industry Partners West Lewis, Scotland Aquamarine Power Scottish and Southern Energy ABB Technology Ventures Technology and site information * The blue shading indicates the parameter that applies to the specific scenario. Wave Nearshore Offshore Constrained Fixed Floating Floating Fixed Point Attenuator Absorber Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Tidal Headland Floating Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 12-20 20-80 Rock Rock with sediment ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand ≤3 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 15 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 3.2 Validation Scenario 2 – Fair Head Tidal DP Energy wih project partners DEME Blue Energy, and associated technology suppliers, intend to build out a 100MW tidal energy project on the north east coast of Northern Ireland at Fair Head near Ballycastle. The preferred technology used for this location will be seabed mounted horizontal axis turbine however, floating tidal devices are also under consideration. The technology has not yet been confirmed, however, the devices currently under consideration are from Marine Current Turbine, Alstom TGL and Scotrenewables Tidal Power Ltd. Figure 7: Fair Head Tidal scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 16 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table 3: Scenario 2 project summary table. Validation Scenario 2 – Summary Table Name Fair Head Tidal Location Technology Marine Current Turbines, Alstom TGL or Scotrenewables Tidal Power Ltd Industry Partners Fair Head, Northern Ireland DP Energy DEME Blue Energy Technology and site information * The blue shading indicates the parameter which applies to the specific scenario. Wave Tidal Nearshore Offshore Constrained Headland Fixed Floating Floating Fixed Floating Point Attenuator Absorber Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 10-20 20-80 rock Rock and Sediments ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand 3 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 17 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 3.3 Validation Scenario 3 - Aegir Shetland Wave Farm Pelamis Wave Power and Vattenfall have created a joint venture called Aegir Wave Power, the purpose of which is to develop commercial wave farms. A 10MW array, of Pelamis P2 floating attenuator devices, is currently in the planning stage. This development will be located offshore on the west coast of Shetland. Figure 8: Aegir Shetland Array scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 18 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table 4: Scenario 3 project summary table. Validation Scenario 3 – Summary Table Name Technology Aegir Shetland Pelamis P2 Location Industry Partners West Shetland Aegir Wave Power Pelamis Wave Power Vattenfall Technology and site information * The blue shading indicates the parameter which applies to the specific scenario. Wave Nearshore Offshore Constrained Fixed Floating PA Floating Fixed Attenuator Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Tidal Headland Floating Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 10-20 20-80 rock Rock and Sediments ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand 3 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 19 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 3.4 Validation Scenario 4 – WestWave ESB International (ESBI) in Ireland are developing a small wave energy array under European Investment Bank supported NER300. ESBI is working with a consortia of developers, electricity providers and Government bodies to develop a 5MW array of wave energy converters. Whilst the full details of this development are still undergoing consideration, a favoured site of the array is off the coast of west County Clare, Ireland. Figure 9: WestWave scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 20 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table 5: Scenario 4 project summary table. Validation Scenario 4 – Summary Table Name Technology ESBI WestWave Various Location Industry Partners West Clare ESB International Large consortia of technology developers, electricity providers and Government bodies Technology and site information * The blue shading indicates the parameter which applies to the specific scenario. Wave Tidal Nearshore Offshore Constrained Headland Fixed Floating PA Floating Fixed Floating Attenuator Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 10-20 20-80 rock Rock and Sediments ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand 3 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 21 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 3.5 Validation Scenario 5 –Sound of Islay ScottishPower Renewables have applied to develop a 10MW tidal turbine demonstration array in the Sounds of Islay, between the islands of Islay and Jura on the west coast of Scotland. The technology has not yet been confirmed, however, the devices currently under consideration are the HS1000 developed by Andritz Hydro Hammerfest and Alstom’s 1MW tidal turbine. Figure 10: Sound of Islay scenario location map. Source: EDINA Marine Digimap Service. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 22 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios Table 6: Scenario 5 project summary table. Validation Scenario 5 – Summary Table Name Technology Sound of Islay Alstom, Andritz Hydro Hammerfest Location Industry Partners Sound of Islay ScottishPower Renewables Technology and site information * The blue shading indicates the parameter which applies to the specific scenario. Wave Nearshore Offshore Constrained Fixed Floating PA Floating Fixed Attenuator Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Tidal Headland Floating Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 10-20 20-80 Rock Rock and Sediments ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand 3 Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 23 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 4 Overall Validation Scenarios The 5 validation scenarios presented above have been combined in Table 7. The table indicates that the combination of sites exhibited address a wide range of the parameters. Although the scenarios provide a robust dataset for validation purposes, these do not cover the full range of parameters that will be available in the tool. Some exceptions of parameters that are not seen in the scenarios presented above include: • • Very deep water wave or tidal, Very large single rated devices. This summary of which area of the scope are covered provides an indicator of where industry is focusing at the immediate and medium term, and hence provides valuable input to the overall scope of the DTOcean design tools and the corresponding validation scenarios. Table 7: Validation scenarios combined summary. Wave Nearshore Fixed Offshore Floating PA Floating Attenuator Array Size (MW) Water depth Tidal(m) Water depth Wave(m) Seabed Single device rating (MW) Cable distance (km) Load out (km)distance Onshore distance (km) O&M distance (km) Constrained Fixed HA Tidal Headland Floating Cross Cutting Information 5-10 10-60 <30 30 - 80 12-20 20-80 rock Rock with sediment ≤1 ≤2 0-10 10-20 ≤200 ≤2000 0-10 10-50 <20 <100 >60 80-200 Sand and muddy sand ≤3 4.1 Validation Scenario summary Overall, the 5 sites selected as validation scenarios display the wide range of the parameters required for validation of the tool. The chosen sites will allow for validation of immediate, medium and long-term development scenarios. In addition, the design tools will support parameters beyond the details of the scenarios, as has been presented in Table 1. The data from the validation cases will provide a wide range of options and opportunities for validation of the tools developed in subsequent work packages within the DTOcean project. Data will be supplied by the industry partners undergoing actual development of the projects at the validation scenario sites, and the details and format will be further developed during the formulation of Deliverable 1.2(Report on characterisation of data for input to other work packages and formation of database details). Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 24 Deliverable 1.1 – Detailed Scenarios 5 References 1. Aquamarine Power, 2014. Projects: North-west Lewis. Available at: http://www.aquamarinepower.com/projects/north-west-lewis/ [Accessed February 24, 2014]. 2. Aquaret, 2012. Technology animations. Available at: http://www.aquaret.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=203&Itemid=34 4&lang=en#Animations [Accessed February 24, 2014]. 3. Cradden, Lucy, "Aegir Shetland Array Scenario Location Map" [PNG map], Scale , SeaZone Charted Raster [TIFF geospatial data], Updated: , SeaZone Solutions Ltd, UK, Using: EDINA Marine Digimap Service, <http://edina.ac.uk/digimap>, Created: February 2014 4. Cradden, Lucy, "Fair Head Tidal Scenario Location Map" [PNG map], Scale , SeaZone Charted Raster [TIFF geospatial data], Updated: , SeaZone Solutions Ltd, UK, Using: EDINA Marine Digimap Service, <http://edina.ac.uk/digimap>, Created: February 2014 5. Cradden, Lucy, "Lewis Wave Scenario Location Map" [PNG map], Scale , SeaZone Charted Raster [TIFF geospatial data], Updated: , SeaZone Solutions Ltd, UK, Using: EDINA Marine Digimap Service, <http://edina.ac.uk/digimap>, Created: February 2014 6. Cradden, Lucy, "Sound of Islay Scenario Location Map" [PNG map], Scale , SeaZone Charted Raster [TIFF geospatial data], Updated: , SeaZone Solutions Ltd, UK, Using: EDINA Marine Digimap Service, <http://edina.ac.uk/digimap>, Created: February 2014 7. DP Energy, 2012. Fair Head Tidal. Available at: http://www.fairheadtidal.com/ [Accessed February 24, 2014]. 8. Energie hydraulique Innover, 2011. L’hydrolienne 100% bois! Available at: http://www.faiteslepleindavenir.com/2011/11/04/lhydrolienne-100-bois/ [Accessed February 26, 2014]. 9. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2009. Ocean Power Technologies. Available at: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/conservationstrategy/news/2009/2009_march.asp [Accessed February 26, 2014]. 10. Pelamis Wave Power, Aegir-Shetland Wave Farm. Available at: http://www.pelamiswave.com/our-projects/project/3/Aegir-Shetland-Wave-Farm [Accessed February 24, 2014]. 11. ScottishPower Renewables, 2014. Sound of Islay. Available at: http://www.scottishpowerrenewables.com/pages/sound_of_islay.asp [Accessed February 14, 1BC]. 12. WestWave, 2012. The WestWave Project. Available at: http://www.westwave.ie/ [Accessed February 26, 2014]. Doc: DTO_WP1_ECD_D1.1 Rev: 1.0 Date: 26.02.2014 25