Uploaded by raven1985

Research topic for Workshop

advertisement
2015 UCLA-SJTU Summer Workshop
July 7-13, 2015
Shanghai Jiaotong University
Research Topic
I am going to examine the relationship between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Chinese
Protestantism in the early People's Republic of China (PRC) in terms of state-society relationship by
analyzing Tian Feng, official journal of the Three-self Reform Movement Committee, preserved in the
Shanghai Municipal Archives.
The research Question is why the CCP allowed the Three-self Committee, the mass organization for
Protestantism and sustained tolerant attitude to Protestants right after having established the Communist
state. Although many conventional studies assumes that the system by which the CCP managed Chinese
Protestantism in the early days of the PRC was coercive and the Party-state was the only agent of
religious policy formation aiming at complete control over Chinese Protestantism. the CCP encouraged
political participation of Chinese Protestantism for efficient implementation of its religious policy.
According to my analysis, this was due to the discrepancies between the ideals and the realities. the
CCP state’s strong intention to expand its power to religious area, on one hand, and on the other, the
lack of means to realize the intention. Facing such discrepancies CCP paid its attention to “autonomous”
Christian’s organization which led to the establishment of Three-self Committee in national level in
1954.
According to the CCP terminology, the “autonomy” did not mean self-determination or complete
independence of Protestantism from state power, but rather believers’ voluntary response to and active
participation in the governmental religious policy execution. The CCP’s emphasis upon the autonomy
of Protestantism signifies that the CCP power could not infiltrate into religious area under its early
conditions of lacking in enough ability to administer the over one million protestants believers, and
thereby appealing to the their voluntary cooperation with state. And in the early PRC, the Party-state
intended to exert effectively its power over the religious sphere, thereby absorbing social capital from
religious forces to consolidate the regime. To this end, the CCP guaranteed a certain space of religious
activities for Chinese Protestantism and invited it to cooperate with state by forming its own mass
organization.
In response to state's demand, Chinese Protestantism organized Three-self Reform Movement
Committee since 1950 and cooperated with CCP in its religious policy in many ways. First, the
Committee legitimized its participation in the Korean War and the anti-imperialism movement by
declaring a series of manifesto. And it also arranged various accusation meetings and political study
sessions in favor of CCP's requests. It is worth noting that such cooperation with the CCP was based on
Chinese Protestantism's own motives. By meeting the state's demand, it could secure a theoretical basis
that guaranteed the existence of Christianity under the communist regime and furthermore could obtain
social reward that permitted the Committee to exert its influence on whole Chinese Christianity. In this
regard, it can be concluded that the Committee's political participation in the early 1950s was not
necessarily attributed to fear for the repressive Party-state, but to a certain degree of voluntarism of
Chinese Protestantism itself.
In sum, beyond the conventional “state control” approaches based on the totalitarian model, I try to
redefine such autonomy given to the Three-self Committee as the Communists’ effort to establish a kind
of governance system in which the state leads religious autonomy under the state leadership. In other
words state-society relationship formed between the CCP and Chinese Protestantism in the early PRC
is kind of co-operational governing meaning that the state encourages the voluntary participation of
society under state leadership rather than state's unilateral control over society. In this system, though it
is apparent that the Party-state still played a leading role in the relationship with Protestantism, it
attempted to govern society through the interaction with people who have faith in God.
Download