Critical Thinking and Reflective Practices (EDU406) Assignment 1 (Fall 2019) Total Marks: 20 Lecture No. 1-12 (Topic 1-72) Instructions: Late assignments will not be accepted. If the file is corrupt or problematic, it will be marked zero. Plagiarism will never be tolerated. Plagiarism occurs when a student uses work done by someone else as if it was his or her own; however, taking the ideas from different sources and expressing them in your own words will be encouraged. No assignment will be accepted via e-mail. The solution file should be in Word document format; the font colour should be preferably black and font size should be 12 Times New Roman. Synopsis and context of assignment This assessment aims to develop your critical thinking skills and reflection skills, comprising two components: knowledge of reflective practice and a critical disposition. This reflective essay of 800-1000 words aims to assess your critical disposition by using a range of critical skills to reflect upon a critical incident. This incident is one that has significance for you as a particular individual, leading to a shift in your understanding of teaching and learning or towards an aspect of education. It could be a single lesson, or a semester of teaching, for example. That is, it may have led you questioning an aspect of your beliefs, values, attitude or behaviour as a teacher/ reflective practitioner. The focus of event MUST be on building student-teacher relationships. Reflective Essay Task: Reflect about your developing critical disposition towards building student-teacher relationships by using critical skills in an essay. Essay shall consist of following three parts: Background/Description (recollect, comprehend, apply) Reflection/ Interpretation (analyze, evaluate) Outcomes (justify, synthesize) 1 Reflective Essay Criteria Sheet and Rubric Criterion Reflect about your developing critical disposition towards teaching by using critical skills in an essay: background (recollect, comprehend, apply) reflection (analyse, evaluate) outcomes (justify, synthesise) High Distinction Distinction Average Below Average In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a background that comprised: a detailed and thorough description of what you recollected about the incident, including when and where it took place (7 marks) a perceptive explanation of why it was significant (had meaning) for you, that included applying the important relevant aspects of the incident to your disposition towards teaching (8 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a background that comprised: a detailed description of what you recollected about the incident, including when and where it took place (6 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a background that comprised: a partly detailed description of what you recollected about the incident, including when and where it took place (5 marks) an explanation of why it was significant (had meaning) for you, that included applying some of the important relevant aspects of the incident to your disposition towards teaching (6 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a background that comprised: an outline of what you recollected as the order of events in the incident, including when and where it took place (4 marks) a comprehensive explanation of why it was significant (had meaning) for you, that included applying most of the important relevant aspects of the incident to your disposition towards teaching (7 marks) loosely-linked statements about why it was significant (had meaning) for you, that made passing reference to the important relevant aspects of the incident (4 marks) Poor In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a background that comprised: a rough outline of what you recollected as the order of events in the incident including when and where it took place (3 marks) separate sweeping statements about the incident and what you thought about it (2 marks) 2 Reflective Essay Criteria Sheet and Rubric Criterion High Distinction Distinction Average Below Average In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a reflection that involved: a thorough and insightful analysis in which you identified the thoughts and feelings that were generated during and after the incident, and clearly explained how all of these related to each other (10 marks) a considered and sensitive evaluation of how much impact the incident had on these thoughts and feelings in terms of affecting your knowledge, values, assumptions, beliefs or perspectives (10 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a reflection that involved: a reasonably thorough analysis in which you identified the thoughts and feelings that were generated during and after the incident, and clearly explained how most of these related to each other (8 marks) a considered evaluation of how much impact the incident had on these thoughts and feelings in terms of affecting your knowledge, values, assumptions, beliefs or perspectives (8 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a reflection that involved: an analysis in which you identified the thoughts and feelings that were generated during and after the incident, and explained how most of these related to each other (6 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: a reflection that involved: a superficial analysis in which you identified the thoughts and feelings that were generated during and after the incident, and made general statements about how these related to each other (5 marks) a partial evaluation made up of broad generalisations about how much impact the incident had on these thoughts and feelings (5 marks) an evaluation of how much impact the incident had on these thoughts and feelings in terms of affecting your knowledge, values, assumptions, beliefs or perspectives (6 marks) Poor In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: an reflection that involved: a repetition of the information given in the background (4 marks) a statement that the incident did or did not have an impact on your thoughts and feelings (4 marks) 3 Reflective Essay Criteria Sheet and Rubric Criterion High Distinction Distinction Average Below Average In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: outcomes that included: a realistic and achievable plan of action with convincing reasons (justification) that explicitly related to your analysis and evaluation of the incident (7 marks) a logically organised and concise conclusion (synthesis) that combined the different parts of your reflection into a new and cohesive observation about how your critical disposition has changed (8 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: outcomes that included: a realistic and achievable plan of action with mostly convincing reasons (justification) that related to your analysis and evaluation of the incident (6 marks) a logically organised conclusion (synthesis) that combined the different parts of your reflection into a new and mostly cohesive observation about how your critical disposition has changed (7 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: outcomes that included: a realistic plan of action with partly convincing reasons (justification) that made some reference to your analysis and evaluation of the incident (5 marks) In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: outcomes that included: a plan of action with reasons (justification) that made some reference to your analysis and evaluation of the incident (4 marks) a conclusion (synthesis) that combined most of the different parts of your reflection into a new observation about how your critical disposition has changed (6 marks) a conclusion (synthesis) that combined a few of the different parts of your reflection into a new observation about how your critical disposition has changed (4 marks) Poor In your reflective essay about a critical incident you provided: outcomes that included: general ideas rather than a plan of action, with reasons (justification) that paraphrased previous information given in the background (3 marks) a conclusion stating that your critical disposition has changed (2 marks) 4