Global Human Resource Management Chapter 18 © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 The Strategic Role of International HRM Staffing policy: Selecting individuals with requisite skills to do a particular job. Tool for developing and promoting corporate culture. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-1 Strategy, Structure and Control Systems International Strategy Structure and Controls Centralization of operating decision Horizontal differentiation Need for coordination Integrating mechanisms Performance Ambiguity Need for cultural controls Multidomestic Decentralized Worldwide area structure Low None International Global Transnational Core competency Some centralized Mixed centralized centralized and decentralized Rest decentralized Informal matrix Worldwide product division Worldwide Informal matrix product division Moderate High Very high Few Many Very many Low Moderate High Very high Low Moderate High Very high © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Table 18.1 18-2 Types of Staffing Policy Ethnocentric: All key management positions are filled by parent-company nationals. Polycentric: Host-country nationals manage subsidiaries, parentcompany nationals have key positions at headquarters. Geocentric: Seek best people for key jobs, regardless of nationality. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-3 Comparison of Staffing Approaches Staffing Approach Ethnocentric Strategic Appropriateness International Polycentric Multidomestic Geocentric Global and Transnational Advantages Overcomes lack of qualified managers host nation Unified culture Helps transfer core competencies Alleviates cultural myopia Inexpensive to implement Uses human resources efficiently Helps build strong culture and informal management network © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Disadvantages Produces resentment in host country Can lead to cultural myopia Limits career mobility Isolates headquarters from foreign subsidiaries National immigration policies may limit implementation Expensive Table 18.2 18-4 The Expatriate Problem Expatriate failure: Premature return of the expatriate manager to his/her home country. Cost of failure is high: Estimate - 3X the expatriate’s annual salary plus the cost of relocation (impacted by currency exchange rates and assignment location). © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-5 Expatriate Failure Rates Recall Rate Percent US Multinationals 20 - 40% 10 - 20% < 10 European Multinationals 11 - 15% 6 - 10 <5 Japanese Multinationals 11 - 19% 6 - 10 <5 Percent of Companies 7% 69 24 3% 38 59 14% 10 76 Table 18.3 © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-6 Reason for Expatriate Failure US Multinationals Inability of spouse to adjust. Manager’s inability to adjust. Other family problems. Manager’s personal or emotional immaturity. Inability to cope with larger overseas responsibilities. Japanese Firms Inability to cope with larger overseas responsibilities. Difficulties with the new environment. Personal or emotional problems. Lack of technical competence. Inability of spouse to adjust. European Multinationals: Inability of spouse to adjust. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-7 Expatriate Selection Self-orientation: Strengthen self-esteem, self-confidence and mental well-being. Others-orientation: Enhance ability to interact with host-country nationals. Perceptual ability: The ability to empathize - understand why people in host-country behave the way they do. Cultural toughness: How well an expatriate adjusts to a particular posting tends to be related to the country of assignment. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-8 Training for Expatriate Managers Cultural: Seeks to foster an appreciation of the hostcountry’s culture. Language: Can improve expatriate’s effectiveness, relate more easily to culture 1. Culture and fostered a better firm image. 2. Language Practical: 3. Practical Ease into day-to-day life of the host country. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-9 Repatriation of Expatriates Didn’t know what position they hold upon return. Firm vague about return, role and career progression. Took lower level job. Leave firm within one year. Leave firm within three years 10 © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 20 30 40 50 60 18-10 70 Performance Appraisal Problems: Unintentional bias. • Host-nation biased by cultural frame of reference. • Home-country biased by distance and lack of experience working abroad. Expatriate managers believe that headquarters unfairly evaluates and appreciates them. • Many believe a foreign posting does not benefit their career. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-11 Guidelines for Performance Appraisal More weight given to on-site manager’s evaluation. Former expatriate who served in the same location should assist home-office manager with the evaluation. If foreign on-sight manager preparing evaluation, home-office manager consulted before evaluation is finalized. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-12 A Typical Balance Sheet Figure 18.1 Income Taxes Home and HostCountry Income Taxes Housing Additional Costs Paid by Company Income Taxes Premiums and Incentives Housing Income Taxes Housing Goods and Services Goods and Services Reserve Housing Goods and Services Reserve Goods and Services Reserve Reserve HomeCountry Salary HostCountry Costs Host-Country Costs Paid by Company and from Salary Home- Country Equivalent Purchasing Power © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-13 International Labor Relations Key issue: degree to which organized labor can limit the choices of an international business. Labor concerns: Counter bargaining power with threat to move jobs off-shore. Keep high-skill work at home and ship lowskill work to foreign plants. Importing employment practices and contractual agreements from the home-country. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-14 Strategy of International Labor Try to establish international labor organizations. Lobby legislatures to restrict multinationals. Use United Nations to regulate multinationals. Efforts have not been successful. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-15 Multinationals’ Approach to Labor Relations Decentralize: labor laws, union power and nature of collective bargaining varies from country to country. Centralize: Want to rationalize global operations. Need to control labor costs and maximize threat of move to lower cost country. Before move, get new union approval for work practices. © McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 18-16