Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Division of QUEZON
General Nakar District 2
PAARALANG SEKUNDARYA NG HENERAL NAKAR-MAIN
General Nakar, Quezon
CONSOLIDATED NARRATIVE REPORT OF THE FIRST SEMESTER 2018-2019
Result of Mean, MPS and SD from First Quarter to Second Quarter
on Grade 11 –Courage TVL Housekeeping,
Grade 11 Empathy HUMSS Personal Development
Grade 12 Chastity GAS on Community Engagement
Grade 12 Benevolence HUMSS on Philippine Politics and Governance
INTRODUCTION
Apparently handling various Senior High Track is very challenging on the part of the
mentor. Considering the fact that the performance of the learners depends on how the learning
competencies have been acquired and done in the given time bound.
However, even the content standard and performances obtain a very satisfactory rate after
end of every quarter; the challenge will still be there to move towards the higher level. This is
education, the continuing process of learning.
Housekeeping is introduced as additional strand under the TVL track of Home
Economics. The Personal Development is a Core Subject while Community Engagement and
Philippine Politics and Governance are both major subjects under Humanities and Social Science
Strand of Academics Track.
MEAN, MPS AND SD IN HOUSEKEEPING GRADE 11-COURAGE
First and Second Quarter of First Semester 2018-2019
Table 1
SECTION
COURAGE
AVERAGE
FIRST QUARTER
MEAN
MPS
SD
25.90
25.90
64.77
64.77
8.40
8.40
SECOND QUARTER
STANDARD
MEAN MPS
DEVIATION
35.18
35.18
70.20
70.20
6.30
6.30
Table 1 showed the result of Mean, MPS and SD of Grade 11 Courage taking TVLHousekeeping from the First and Second Quarter of First Semester 2018-2019. The MEAN is
increased to 9.28 while the MPS elevated to 5.43 in the second quarter while the SD has a
difference of 2.10.
MEAN, MPS AND SD IN PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT GRADE 11-EMPATHY
HUMSS
First and Second Quarter of First Semester 2018-2019
Table 2
SECTION
EMPATHY
AVERAGE
FIRST QUARTER
MEAN
MPS
SD
25.52
25.52
63.80
63.80
7.20
7.20
SECOND QUARTER
STANDARD
MEAN MPS
DEVIATION
29.02
29.02
64.49
64.49
7.10
7.10
Table 2 showed the result of Mean, MPS and SD of Personal Development of Grade 11
Empathy taking Humanities and Social Science from the First and Second Quarter of First
Semester 2018-2019. The MEAN is increased to 3.50 while the MPS minimal increased to .69
in the second quarter while the SD has only less difference of .10.
MEAN, MPS AND SD IN COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GRADE 12-CHASTITY GAS
First and Second Quarter of First Semester 2018-2019
Table 3
SECTION
CHASTITY
AVERAGE
FIRST QUARTER
MEAN
MPS
SD
25.41
25.41
63.52
63.52
9.10
9.10
SECOND QUARTER
STANDARD
MEAN MPS
DEVIATION
34.54
34.54
68.60
68.60
8.90
8.90
Table 3 showed the result of Mean, MPS and SD of Community Engagement of Grade 12
Chastity taking General Academics Strand from the First and Second Quarter of First Semester
2018-2019. The MEAN is increased to 9.13 while the MPS ascended to 5.08 in the second
quarter while the SD has only less difference of 0.20.
MEAN, MPS AND SD IN PHILIPPINE POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE GRADE 12BENEVOLENCE HUMSS
First and Second Quarter of First Semester 2018-2019
Table 4
SECTION
BENEVOLENCE
AVERAGE
FIRST QUARTER
MEAN
MPS
SD
34.42
34.42
64.41
64.41
8.29
8.29
SECOND QUARTER
STANDARD
MEAN MPS
DEVIATION
36.61
36.61
73.00
73.00
8.20
8.20
Table 4 showed the result of Mean, MPS and SD of Philippine Politics and Governance of
Grade 12 Benevolence taking Humanities and Social Science from the First and Second Quarter
of First Semester 2018-2019. The MEAN is increased to 2.19 while the MPS ascended to 8.59
in the second quarter while the SD has only less difference of 0.09.
PROBLEMS MET
The following are the problems encountered:
1. Sudden power interruption while doing some ICT Integration in the lessons
2. Lack of Housekeeping tools and Equipment/Supplies and Materials for practical
application.
3. Unpredictable weather condition that caused delay of implementation in the field
practicum for Community Engagement activity.
ACTION TAKEN/INTERVENTION
The following are the solutions done in order to address the aforementioned problems
encountered:
1. Rescheduling of ICT Integration and Utilization and get advance notice of scheduled
power interruption.
2. Use available cleaning tools ( from SHS TVL supplies) as alternative.
3. Utilize alternative activity to be done inside the school community with the same
program.
RECOMMENDATIONS :
The following are the recommendations for the improvement of the learners’ academic
performance in terms of MPS:
1. Always make use of Plan A and B in ICT integration and may request to have additional
DLP.
2. Make request to SHS MOOE for the Housekeeping tools and equipment, supplies and
materials. Provided a room as avenue for actual training on housekeeping.
3. Provide financial assistance as travel expenses for Community Engagement Activity
outside the school.
Submitted by
GEMMA V. ASTOVEZA
SHS T-III
Submitted to:
JEAN J. CRISOSTOMO
SHS MT-I/COORDINATOR
Noted:
FELIX M. ALEGRE
PRINCIPAL III
PAARALANG SEKUNDARYA NG HENERAL NAKAR
Gen. Nakar, Quezon
Narrative Report on Third Quarter MEAN, MPS and SD in
Technology and Livelihood Education
Grade 8
INTRODUCTION
Teaching is a very noble profession that shapes the character, calibre, and future of an
individual (A. P. J. Abdul Kalam). This is one of the common quotations we hear today that
makes us determined, hopeful and confident as teacher. Hence, we did our best just to teach
and nurture the young minds of this present generation, the millennial learners.
The Department of Education particularly the Division Office set a standard of 60% in
terms of Mean Percentage Score (MPS) to assure that our students receive quality education.
Fortunately, there are three sections in G8 who got an MPS greater than the set standard by
the Division. The remaining two sections got a little lower but remain higher the average than
the 60% target.
Since there is only one quarter left for the present school year, the Grade 8 teacher in
TLE aims 5% additional increase in the MPS of third quarter so that all classes in Grade 8 will
reach the Division standard. The teacher believes that this will be attained by intensifying the
use of technology in teaching such as laptop, LCD projector (if available), and other innovative
techniques in assessing and evaluating the learners’ performance. One example in
administering formative test is that the teacher will always prepare five-item HOTS questions.
These questions will be compiled in individual folder. During periodical test, the teacher will
just pick at questions from their folder to be included in the test.
MEAN, MPS AND SD IN TLE 8
Third Quarter
Table 1
SECTION
MEAN
MPS
SD
HUMILITY
30.21
75.53
6.70
FORTITUDE
24.73
61.83
7.88
TEMPERANCE
22.98
57.44
7.92
SIMPLICITY
26.12
65.30
6.31
Newton
22.72
56.79
6.85
Average
25.35
63.38
7.13
PROBLEMS MET
The following are the problems encountered by the teachers in teaching TLE subject:
1. Limited resources/materials in TLE subject
2. Absenteeism and cutting classes
3. Less retention of the learners on the subject matter
ACTION TAKEN/INTERVENTION
The following are the solutions done by the teachers in order to address to
aforementioned problems encountered:
1. Provide materials for the learners’ activity such as photocopy of the lesson, browsing
from the internet
2. One-on-one conference with the learners after class
3. Use of Individual Folder containing HOTS questions given as formative assessment
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are the recommendations for the improvement of the learners’ academic
performance in terms of MPS:
1. Provision of Teacher’s Guide and Learner’s Module in TLE
2. Conduct one-on-one conference with the learners after class
3. Utilization of Individual Folder containing HOTS questions given as formative
assessment
Comparison of MEAN, MPS & SD in TLE 8
Table 2
SECOND QUARTER
SECTION
THIRD QUARTER
DIFFERENCE
MEAN
MPS
SD
MEAN
MPS
SD
MEAN
MPS
SD
HUMILITY
27.19
67.98
4.79
30.21
75.53
6.7
3.02
7.55
1.91
FORTITUDE
22.67
56.67
7.28
24.73
61.83
7.88
2.06
5.16
0.6
TEMPERANCE
22.11
55.28
6.47
22.98
57.44
7.92
0.87
2.16
1.45
SIMPLICITY
24.2
60.49
6.57
26.12
65.3
6.31
1.92
4.81
-0.26
Newton
22.05
55.13
5.61
22.72
56.79
6.85
0.67
1.66
1.24
Average
23.64
59.11
6.14
25.35
63.38
7.13
1.71
4.27
0.99
Table 2 shows the comparison of Mean, MPS and SD of the second and third quarter in
G8 TLE. Based on the presented data, there is anincrease of 1.71% in the average Mean, 4.27%
in the average MPS and 0.99% in the average Standard Deviation. The increase can be attributed
to the different factors mentioned in the action taken.
Prepared by:
RHOEL P. BALITACTAC
G8 TLE Teacher
Noted:
CORAZON S. BAJADO
TLE Department Head