Dropping of the Atomic DBQ Name HISTORICAL CONTEXT: With the dropping of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese surrendered signaling the end of WWII. Historians, however, are still debating whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war quickly. TASK: In a well-written essay, you must: Decide whether or not the United States was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Give at least three (3) historically accurate facts to defend your position. HELPFUL HINTS: Use at least 3 documents in your essay. This will require you to utilize a document that does not help your argument. You must be able to take a document and spin it to explain how it actually is incorrect in your opinion. When selecting documents, be sure that you do not simply list them, but accurately analyze them (this is what separates a “4” paper from a “5” paper). Your outside knowledge on this subject is extensive. Think of everything that we have learned over the past 3 weeks and use it to your advantage. When taking a stand, be sure to use as much evidence as possible to explain your point. Stick to your point. When writing an argumentative DBQ paper, be sure to avoid telling both sides of the argument. A Defense lawyer does not explain the Prosecution’s side she simply makes her client look innocent. Cite the documents after the sentence and try to quote at least one document in your paper. If you believe that the United States was not justified in dropping the atomic bomb, you should offer what you believe was the best alternative. Choosing nothing is not a choice. DOCUMENT #1: Rape of Nanking In 1936 and 1937 the Japanese army entered the city of Nanking, what happened there over six weeks is known as The Rape of Nanking. 1. How might the photograph influence the American president into believing that the atomic attacks on Japanese civilians were justified? The Japanese were brutally killing unarmed Americans that were captured. DOCUMENT #2: League of Nations International Law Protection of Civilian Populations Against Bombing From the Air in Case of War, League of Nations, September 30, 1938 PROTECTION OF CIVILIAN POPULATIONS AGAINST BOMBING FROM THE AIR IN CASE OF WAR Unanimous resolution of the League of Nations Assembly, September 30, 1938. The Assembly, Considering that on numerous occasions public opinion has expressed through the most authoritative channels its horror of the bombing of civilian populations; Considering that this practice, for which there is no military necessity and which, as experience shows, only causes needless suffering, is condemned under the recognised principles of international law;… I. Recognizes the following principles as a necessary basis for any subsequent regulations: 1) The intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal; 2) Objectives aimed at from the air must be legitimate military objectives and must be identifiable; 3) Any attack on legitimate military objectives must be carried out in such a way that civilian populations in the neighbourhood are not bombed through negligence; 1. What is the date of this document? September 30, 1938 2. What international organization passed this law? 3. Identify one way the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illegal according to this law. They were innocent civilians that had no part in the war. League of Nations DOCUMENT #3: Japanese Kamikaze Pilots As the war progressed and it became obvious that American technology was superior to Japan’s, the Japanese began utilizing kamikaze pilots to attack Allied ships in the Pacific to balance the power. The Japanese pilots became “guided” missiles taking out American ships. 1. How might the Japanese use of Kamikaze pilots influence Harry Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? They were taking out innocent lives on ships. The Japanese believed if their plane was going down that they should do as much destruction to enemies as possible. DOCUMENT #4: Letter of Scientists opposed to nuclear weapon in war EXCERPTS OF THE LETTER: To the President of the United States: We, the undersigned scientific personnel…believe that the worldwide political and social consequences of the power of the weapon being developed…(require the United States to have that power to be) made known by a demonstration to the peoples of the world…Therefore we recommend that before this weapon be used without restriction…its powers should be…demonstrated, and the Japanese nation should be given the opportunity to consider the consequences of further refusal to surrender. 1. According to this letter, why are these scientists opposed to the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japanese cities? They know that the effects of the bomb will be completely devastating, so they recommend giving Japan an opportunity to surrender. DOCUMENT #5: Invasion of JapanThe following are the estimates of casualties, made by US military personnel, in the invasion of Japan. Approximately 500,000 Purple Heart medals (awarded to those wounded or killed while serving with the US military) were manufactured in anticipation of the invasion. However, nobody knows for sure how many Allied or Japanese casualties an invasion would have resulted in. There have been many estimates over the years (some of the estimates below do not include losses at sea). Estimate US/Allied Casualties Japanese Casualties Olympic Wounded: 347,000 Olympic Dead/Missing: 109,000 Coronet Wounded: 744,000 Coronet Dead/Missing: 158,000 TOTAL: 1,200,000 N/A First 30 Days: 49,000 N/A General MacArthur's Staff (June 1945) First 120 Days: 125,000 N/A General MacArthur's Staff (Revised Estimate) First 120 Days: 105,000 N/A 70,000 ? 268,000 ? 31,000 to 41,000 ? Wounded: 1,300,000 to 3,200,000 Dead: 400,000 to 800,000 Total: 1,700,000 to 4,000,000 Dead: 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 Kyle Palmer Dead: 500,000 to 1,000,000 ? Harry S. Truman Dead: 500,000 to 1,000,000 ? Joint Chiefs of Staff (April 1945) Admiral Nimitz's Staff (May 1945) General Marshall Admiral Leahy Admiral King William Shockley 1. How many casualties did Harry S Truman believe would occur in an invasion of Japan? 500,000 to 1,000,000 2. How would this influence his decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japanese cities? He could create hundreds of thousands of casualties with only a couple bombs. DOCUMENT #6: Effects of Atomic Attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki The following are visuals and a graph of the after-effects of the attacks. TABLE A: Estimates of Casualties Hiroshima Pre-raid population Nagasaki 255,000 195,000 Dead 66,000 39,000 Injured 69,000 25,000 135,000 64,000 Total Casualties 1. What was the Pre-raid Population of Hiroshima? 255,000 2. What was the Total Casualties number of Hiroshima? 135,000