WHO Global Action Network on Nutrition Labeling: 6-7th February 2019 (Paris) Taking action for better informed consumer choices in the Decade of Action on Nutrition Class 2 – Combination of under-nutrition and obesity (with insufficient vitamin and mineral nutrition) – double burden of malnutrition. Can’t divide people into those that eat too little and those that eat too much, malnutrition is a multidimensional issue, most people are not eating right. Remarkable convergence between the health movement and the environmental movement Different forms of malnutrition can be present throughout one’s life – wasted/stunted children are more likely to develop obesity/hypertension later in life, once exposed to an environment of excess caloric intake. Need a comprehensive response to the challenges of nutrition: Poor water/sanitation Food system that is not providing the right nutrients to everybody SDG 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture Countries asked to make “SMART” commitments during this decade of action on nutrition Means of implementation: Action Networks Information coalitiosn of countries Advocate for the establishment of policies/legislation, allowing the exchange of practices providing mutual support to accelerate implementation Established at the request of one or more countries that have made formal commitments and are prepared to implement policies Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat will disseminate action network information Nutrition Decade champions are frontrunners and lead by example Specific Country Targets: Portugal marketing foods to children Switzerland reduction of sodium Norway sustainable fisheries Chile healthy food environments Nutrition labeling School food procurements What is a HEALTHY DIET? breastmilk calories protein fat carbohydrates sugars sodium fruit n veg Breastfeed exclusively for the first 6mo and continuous breastfeeding until 2years old Energy intake should balance energy expenditure Protein is needed in good quality and adequate amounts to meet individual needs according to factors such as age, gender, and bodyweight Keep total fat intake to less than 30% of total energy intake, with a shift in fat consumption away from saturated to unsaturated fats, and towards the elimination of industrial trans fats Get most of the dietary energy from carbohydrates, mainly as unrefined complex carbohydrates Limit intake of free sugars to less than 10% (or even less than 5%) of total energy intake Keep salt intake to less than 5g per day Eat at least 400g (5 portions) of fruit and vegetables a day Class 3 – the modern political economy of food With much of our global food system controlled by a handful of actors, what is the new political economy of food and how do we promote health in this paradigm? Include the complex and diverse relationships between private sector and policy markers, including the concept of the commercial determinants of health and disease French Anti-Waste Law – no food waste allowed Obligation for restaurants and bars to provide recyclable to-go containers A subsistence economy: A growing population with underprivileged people o 820 million people malnourished o 2.4 billion people obese o 2 billion people deficient on micro-nutrients Food Security o Global food demand is expected to grow by 46% by 2050 Food Waste and Food Aid o 20kg food wasted/person/year (7kg unopened/still packaged); global cost 12-20 billion euros (100-160 euros/person/year), 1/3 of food wasted along supply chain Class 4 – Guest: Prof Bernard Ruffieux Bernard.Ruffieux@grenoble-inp.fr Econ food terms: Client Value, Willingness to Pay (WTP), Posted Price All products in stores are presented as “ultimatums” What is the unit you sell? Ex. Michellin selling tires, OR selling kilometers (safe kilometers). Ex. a Bar selling alcohol OR selling time (branded time) Key Issues of Lecture: consumer (buyer) preferences and behavior (choice) information on the final market foresight (industry 4.0), business strategy and public regulation Foresight – a glance at our possible desired future “out of the box” Classical Economics based on homo Oeconomicus preferences and rationality Focus on Asymmetric Information (i.e. vs. monopoly power, externalities) Lesson: the need for “signals” credible relevant information Public Regulation issue in this frame: “Nutrition Facts are crucial, FoPL is useless” Behavioral Economics Based on Homo Sapiens preferences and rationality (imported from psychology) Focus on a sequential human response to information: exposure (awareness), integration (understanding), valuation (assessment), decision (purchase) Lesson: need for precisely designed information Dd??? Since the 18th century, we’ve lived four industrial revolutions: 1. Age of Adam Smith 2. Age of Fordism 3. Age of Toyotism 4. Age of Industry (4.) 1. Classical Economics Review Market failures. We live in a market society; market is the first matching institution between business and consumers. Public authorities should have (good) reasons to interfere in the market exchanges between private agents (B2B or B2C). Economics identifies a series of reasons for public regulation on the market (i.e. asymmetric information, externalities (positive/negative) and market power (monopoly, oligopoly, cartel)) Product design management follows business strategy: Value proposition: “A consumers target, a desire, a price” Profit – captured value – costs Two Complementary Approaches of a product A Global View – An analytical view (“characteristics” or “attributes”) Food characteristics: price, hedonic, functional (e.g. convenience), brand, production process, nutrition, impacts, etc Economics of Information: three types of characteristics (Search, Experience, Credence) Context of Classic Economics of Information Value and costs Class 6 – EAT – Fabrice DeClerck Norman Borlaug – maize and wheat Background in agricultural and environmental studies, agronomist and ecologist – working with Jessica Fanso (agriculture, environmental health and human health) Setting clear environmental targets, setting clear health targets as to the future of public health, environmental health and agricultural policy Health scientists and environmental scientists are starting to converge, exciting time to pursue this fusion – pluri-disciplinary approaches Columbia Univeristy – Jeff Sachs (an ecologists) on the millennial goals abt hunger and health, transformative program for him and many others Founded 6 years ago – founder brought together 50 ppl to figure out what we know and what we don’t know about this relationship. EAT was formed as a relationship between the STORM_ALLY foundation, Stockholm resilience center and the welcome trust – one of the biggest donors globally in terms of public hleaht and meidcla scietists Science policy and business can have conversations around these challenges and seek solutions, recognize that these challenges were environmental health, human health and htat FOOD is a common theme Stockholm Food Forum (annual event) What is a shared vision in terms of where food needs to go? Can we create a shared set of targets of aspirations for food addressing these multiple dimensions Reocgnizing the scale of the problem – Yohan has been a visionary Scale of human action on the environment has reached geological proportions – there are consequences on a global scale, EAT wants to highlight its not just climate consequences Systems based interventions will be required if we’re going to address these issues We are not yet bending environmental curves Ozone – 1960s, recognized planetary scale When we look at other major environmental challenges, there is no sign of htat curve bending – freshwater resources (ex. Capetown water shortage) Can we bend the curve on biodiversity? By 2020, can we bend the curve on CO2? 2017 we had a slight reduction 80% of freshwater resources go into food production, 80% of dead zones are driven by agricultural production, Feeding 7.5 billion people – Lancet is seating the food system limits for the environmental boundaries, what they don’t do is say how to do it! There are camps that are in agroecology, camps in medical technology saying you should be using GMOs, other saying other things, etc Food systems failing the environment, we see the same thing when we talk about health 3 forms of malnutrition are now spread rather globally – number of countries facing burdens of malnutrition is becoming more complex UNICEF used to have very targeted interventions, but now the challenges faced by children globally are much more systemic, and UNICEF Is trying to take a more food systems approach, you’re finding htat reflection ina growing number of oganizations, increasingly they are being confronted with how are we dealing with these systemic issues --- food, which should be a primary sources of wellbeing has become one of the sources of primary mortality. Food is failing on health as well. We need a systems based approach, how is food a unifying theme that tries to address this. Then what is it about food systems change that To what extent does diet have an impact on environment? Can we define targets for health and sustainable goals for food production systems ? IFPRI - ?? Mixed policy people with environmental science, public health to try to get groups that don’t typically speak to each other to try and tackle these issues. Safe operating space for environment and health – if we exceed those, there are societal consequences that we’ll pay for. What are those limits for food? And can we bring food within those limits? Malleable part (white part of the oreo) – the choices, what we produce, where we produce, gmo vs non, organic vs conventional. This is the safe operating space, this is also the innovation space. 1. Define a healthy reference diet using the best available evidence (controlled feeding studies, long-term cohort studies, randomized trials) 2. Define planetary boundaries for 6 key environmental systems and processes (GHG, cropland use, water use, nitrogen, and phosphorus application, extinction rate) 3. ? 4. ? Health food production. What is a healthy diet? 50% protective 36% netural (refined grains, startches, potatoes) 2% harmful – high fat, high sugar, high sodium 12% PUFA IHME – UNIVERISTY OF WASHINGTON There might be a universal diet, but we need to differentiate pathways (based on income level) to reaching that diet. We’ve been tremendous on being able to provide enough calories for a global diet. Can we produce enough food? YES. But is it the right food ?! Not even close. Focus? Quantity? Proportions? Boston Medical Center culinary prescriptions Copenhagen kitchens went from scissors to knives, from central kitchens to school kitchens Putting the staff in the kitchen Agro-diversity Antibiotics, pesticides, plastics fabrice@eatforum.org 5 strategies : 1. Seek international and national commitment to shift towards healthy diets, food policy and agricultural policy are often antagonistic, agricultural targets work in complete odds to env/health targets can agricultural policy become food policy ?! Paris “Strategie de Paris pour une alimentation durable” producing within a watershed 2. Reorient agricultural priorities from producing high quantities of food to producing healthy food . network for 25 countries/40 cities/40 companies that have agreed to challenge themselves with the EAT commission guidelines. Create a safe space for the hard conversations . reorient food towards quality rather than quantity 3. d 4. strong nad coordinated governnacen of land and oceans -- Class – PNNS: stakes, objectives Objectives: why a national nutrition program in France? Which main strategies? Some main actions: communication, nutria-score, reformulation Why in France, a country proud of its gastronomy, there is a need to develop a specific Programme since 2001? Epidemiological transition away from infectious diseases with the help of magic bullets, yes, but mostly SOAP! Today we have chronic diseases, with a plethora of risk factors ranging from lifestyle choices (i.e. smoking, diets, alcohol consumption, physical activities) to environmental regulation. Individual perception plays a role here, freedom of choice and autonomy are sacred, our diets are intertwined with our identities Nutrition: food and physical activity: nutrients, foods, social, cultural, economic, sensorial and cognitive determinants of food and physical activity behaviors. Permanent evolutions The “way of life” des modes de vie (urbanism – work, hobbies – communications) Food offer, purchase and food and physical activity behaviors Development of the PNNS in France 1998-1999: Rapport DGS (Hercberg & Basdevant) Objectifs nutritionnels de santé publique pour la France 1999-2000: Rapport du HCSP (Hercberg & Tallec): Pour une politique nutritionnelle de sante publique: Enjeux et propositions Improve the health of the population by acting on Nutrition (food and physical activity) one of its main determinants 2001-2005: PNNS1 2006-2010: PNNS2 2011-2018: PNNS3 (+PO 2010-2013) 2019-2023: PNNS4 (related SNSS, PNA, Feuille de route obésité) Nutritional objectives SMAR: Sensitive, Measurables, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound Within the social gradient, tendency of obesity rates to decrease as income levels drop Class 2007 – European strategy on nutrition overweight and obesity-related health issues The EU Platform activity and Health: representatives from the civil society (ONG, scientists, economic actors) a forum for actors at European level who are willing to commit themselves to engaging in concrete actions designed to contain or reverse current trends. The High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity 28 countries + Norway and Switzerland (+WHO) 2-4 meetings a year It seeks European solutions to health issues related to obesity by: Giving an overview of the different national policies on nutrition and physical activity; Helping public authorities to share their ideas and practices Improving communication between the public authorities and the European platform on nutrition, physical activity and health. 2008 – European framework for national initiatives on the reduction of salt intakes 2011 – European framework for specific nutrtients: calories, saturated fatty acids, added sugars 2013 – European plan on childhood obesity prepared, set for 2014-2020. Objective: halt the rise of obesity among children and adolescents (0-18 years old) Suggest to MS 8 priority actions with operational objectives. MS are encouraged to develop their own National plan of action. 1. Support a good start in life: increase the prevalence of breastfed children, encourage pregnant women to have healthy eating habits and regular physical activity 2. Promote healthier environments: especially in schools and nurseries, promote the consumption of water and fresh fruits and vegetables at school, make physical education more attractive to teenagers, educate children about nutrition, physical activity at school 3. Facilitate the adoption of healthy behaviors: promote water consumption, inform about portion sizes 4. Restrict communication and advertising: aimed at children, make recommendations regarding food marketing on television, on the internet and at events. 5. Inform and encourage families: promote the importance of time together in a family or with friends, make nutritional information more effective and understandable by all 6. Encourage the practice of physical activity: create urban environments conducive to the daily practice of physical activities 7. Monitor and evaluate: harmonize school nutrition monitoring, health, eating behaviors and physical activity levels of children, set up indicators to evaluate the action plan. 8. Develop research: increasing financial support of national and European research programs European actions on Nutrition and Physical Activity …. EU Council Resolution on health and nutrition (14 December 2000) EU Council Conclusions on: o Obesity (2002) o Healthy lifestyle (2003) o Promoting Heart Health (2004) o Health in all policies (HiAP) (2006) o Putting the EU strategy on nutrition, overweight and obesity-related health issues into operation (2007) o Action to reduce population salt intake for better health (2010) o Innovative approaches for chronic diseases in public health and healthcare systems (2010) o Closing health gaps within the EU through concerted action to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors (2011) o Promoting health-enhancing physical activity (2012) o Health Ageing across Lifecycle (2012) o Recommendation on promoting health enhancing physical activity across sector (2013) o Nutrition and physical activity (2014) o Improvement of food products (2016) o Halt the rise of childhood overweight and obesity (2017) o Healthy nutrition for children: the healthy future of Europe (2017) Many research and intervention projects receive financial support form the Commission: SALUS, HEPCOM, PoHeFa, EYTO, MOVE, FOOD, IMPALA, PASEO, PREVACT, Healthy Children in Healthy Families, Obesity Governance project, Community based Childhood Obesity, Econda Project, NOPA, COSI, Toybox, Habeat, Healthy Eco Life Project, Equity action, Euro Hear II JANPA organization Class 11 – New Business Models (for prevention) Dr. Hazel Wallace, Isabelle Grosmaitre, Sandrao Demaio What is the role of innovation and social enterprise in driving a new wave of health, prevention and promotion activities? What are tangible examples of success, and what can be adapted or learnt from other sectors? Include role of mixed-funding models and PPPs. Catalyst – Danone Role is to bring people together to best impact the lives of people, health of people and health of the planet – businesses are playing a critical role, worked in pharma, worked in health insurance, joined Danone 7 years ago b/c food is the biggest challenge of the 21st century. Set up partnerships and collaborative models. “Get the right people around the table.” Rebalance the unbalance. A company the size of Danone can really change the landscape of the world. Revolutionary thinking is needed to impact the world, need to bring new business practices that will grow ….grow what? The business? Need to act together, more about the skills and the attitude. The food generation craving for change. Cannot talk about health and nutrition if we don’t consider the health of the planet. Millennials are 1/3 of total consumption – looking for brands that are doing good to the world Strive to eliminate the trade off between economic success and social progress. B Corp Certified B Corporations are businesses that meet the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability to balance profit and purpose. B Corps form a community of leaders and drive a global movement of people using business as a force for good. Each time you eat and drink, you vote for the world you want to live in. A new food economy is being invented. Re-localization of the economy, big companies are losing ground – in the last 5 years, big companies have lost 18 billion, whereas start ups and smaller companies are taking 46% of market share. Issue with the mid-range businesses, smaller than Danone but bigger than start-ups, who run a certain model and can’t afford a complete shake-up in the name of sustainability, what are they supposed to do? Danone wants to change the way they operate. Emmanuel Faber (Chairman & CEO): “People are changing the ways they eat and drink and the values they attach to food. There is a growing expectation for integrity and transparency, and for products that are grounded in local cultures. This is the start of a revolution in food.” Yogurt gives off 1.25kg of Co2 for every 1kg of yogurt produced. So Danone, who are #1 in fresh dairy products and responsible for production of 27.8% of the yogurt market share in the world, are creating a good deal of CO2. Catalyzing collaborations. Example: Bill Gates. Embarking on a partnership with Danone. Working with cities is important, because it can be difficult to forge partnerships with countries. A coalition of willing partners in service of the food revolution. setting up an Act Tank (vs. Think Tank) Healthier hydration kids project: fluid intakes survey ‘mascot’ marketing campaign business success and healthy switch in kids’ drinking habits Function in various sectors: Schools: teach children, teach staff, reward schools Stores: nudge & reward, healthier baskets, playful education, Danoners & kids day Home: entertainment partnerships, connected hydration, home delivery Communities: farms visit, Danone nations cup, breakfast clubs, access and support programs Want to transform the system at scale. Beyond “license to operate” and beyond “reputation” ? SDG provides an opportunity to transition from peripheral CSR departments to new models where sustainability is actually integrated in the company. Generate profitable, sustainable growth. Growth nonetheless. You’re depending on a consistent proliferation of the livestock industry, which we all know drives emissions – energy use, land-use …. Largest slice of the pie when it comes to food systems emissions …. Largest contributer of non-CO2 emissions, methane roughly 30x more potent as a heat trapping gas due to enteric fermentation – hilariously enough, cow burps Carbon neutrality As an aggregate buyer, how can they use their purchasing power to change dietary behavior. Mayors are huge players in this game. Have their hands on the biggest levers. … fortunate at the global stage.