Patriarchy is a social system in which males hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property. Historically, patriarchy has manifested itself in the social, legal, political, religious and economic organization of a range of different cultures. Even if not explicitly defined to be by their own constitutions and laws, most contemporary societies are, in practice, patriarchal. Example of Patriarchy in the US A photograph of Donald Trump signing the “Global Gag Rule,” which bans international groups from receiving U.S. health funding for providing or even discussing abortions. Monopoly of violence? The monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force, also known as the monopoly on violence, is a core concept of modern public law. Government, in fact, is often defined as the entity which holds the monopoly on violence within a given territory. For millenia, which gender has – by virtue of its significant average genetic physical advantages – held a near monopoly of violence in society? [before the invention of firearms] What Does the Bible Say About Women's Rights? What Does the Bible Say About Women in Ministry? In order to not keep having to repeatedly utter the phrase “according to God, at least from the perspective of Christians who believe that all Bible texts are, as 2 Timothy 3:16-17 states, ‘Inspired by God’” I will simply write “According to God”, “by God” or “According to the Bible”. Please forgive the academic laziness. Frequently Asked Questions Does the Bible say that women must obey their husbands? Is it a sin for a woman to speak in church? Does the Bible say women have lower standing than men? Does the Bible authorize discrimination against women? Should women be submissive? Old Testament Genesis Most of the Bible's teachings about women are based upon the foundation laid in Genesis. Genesis 2:18 “Then the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner.’” “helper” = English translation of the word עֵ זֶרor ʻêzer, [pronounced ay'-zer] found in the original Hebrew Tanakh Other instances of עֵ זֶר in the Tanakh Psalm 33:20 “Our soul waits for the Lord; he is our עֵ זֶר and shield.” Who is ? עֵ זֶר Would you say that the text is implying that “the Lord” is in a position of weakness? Psalm 70:5 “But I am poor and needy; hasten to me, O God! You are my עֵ זֶרand my deliverer; O Lord, do not delay!” Who is ? עֵ זֶר Would you say that the text is implying “God” is subservient to man because He is man’s עֵ זֶר/ “helper” ? Other instances of עֵ זֶר in the Tanakh Psalm 115:9 “O Israel, trust in the Lord! He is their עֵ זֶרand their shield. Look at the Hermeneutics notes you took yesterday from the PowerPoint By showing different Biblical uses of the word עֵ זֶרin order to better understand Genesis 2:18 “Then the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper [ ] עֵ זֶרas his partner.’” what step in the Exegetical Process did we practice? Lexical Analysis: Repeated words Woman predestined by God to be a “helper” to man For millennia, Genesis 2:18 has been used by many ancient and modern Jews, Christians, and Muslims as the basis for implying that women were programmed right down to their DNA- to be Inferior Subservient However, a simple word study can provide an alternative perspective on the “helper” role assigned by God at the beginning Woman as …? Genesis 1:27-28 So God created humankind[a] in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” Who is being given authority to “subdue1” the earth? Who is being given dominion over the sea, air, and earth? כָּבַ ׁשkâbash, [kaw-bash‘] = bring into subjection Woman as an equal to man Genesis 1:27-28 So God created humankind[a] in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” Does God seem to differentiate here on who has authority over the earth? Godlike woman Genesis 5:1-2 When God created humankind, he made them in the likeness of God. 2 Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them “Humankind” when they were created. According to this text, which gender was created to be like God? According to this text, was one gender created to be less Godlike than the other? “Yeah, but Eve ate the forbidden fruit…” Woman as the target of evil For reasons that are never revealed in the Bible, the Serpent tempted Eve instead of Adam. The fact that the scripture says that Eve ate the forbidden fruit FIRST has been used for millennia as a sign of her inferiority to men, though one could argue it was an arbitrary sequence of events Furthermore… Genesis 3:16-19 What conclusion might one draw from the man receiving the brunt of the punishment? To the woman he said And to the man he said “I will greatly increase your pangs in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life; 18 thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return.” Who is cursed with the bulk of the punishment here? Genesis 3:16-19 To the woman he said And to the man he said “I will greatly increase your pangs in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life; 18 thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return.” Genesis 3:16-19 To the woman he said “I will greatly increase your pangs in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” And to the man he said “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ note:of you; cursed Interesting is the ground to because It isinimplied hereeat that type ofof your toil you shall of itthe all the days life; that women have for for men desire 18 thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for is what? you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return.” Does God command Adam to sweat? If a man does not sweat, is he disobeying a command of God? Woman as ruled As you can see from the text, man was not ordered by God to rule over woman. It can be easily argued that Woman was cursed with a desire that would cause, by consequence, men to rule over her If “he shall rule over you” were an edict by God, who would God have addressed that passage to? In fact who was He addressing, according to the text? Whether or not one interprets “he shall rule over you” as a direct punishment or as descriptor of the impending consequence of the “desire” curse, this passage is key to understanding later Biblical teachings about women. Both Adam and Eve were punished, and Adam seemingly more so. Yet, throughout the course of history, this text has repeatedly been used by Jews, Christians, and Muslims to justify the degradation and subjugation of women Woman as obeyed Exodus 20:12 Honor your father and your mother, so that your days may be long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you. Who does the writer of Exodus claim wrote the original 10 Commandments? Rarely is the claim made in or out of the Bible that God himself penned words its words, except in this case. Did God differentiate the amount of honor that should be showed to a father or mother? So, if God ordained equal honor to be shown to both parents, to what extent do you think that is a significant indicator of the Judeo-Christian god’s intended status of women? Woman as ruler Following the conquest of Canaan by Joshua until the formation of the first Kingdom of Israel (ca. 1150–1025 BC), the Israelite tribes formed a loose confederation. No central government existed in this confederation; in times of crisis, the people were led by ad hoc chieftains, known as judges (shoftim). Woman as ruler Judges 4:1-15 The Israelites again did what was evil in the sight of the LORD, after Ehud died. So the LORD sold them into the hand of King Jabin of Canaan, who reigned in Hazor; the commander of his army was Sisera, who lived in Harosheth-ha-goiim. Then the Israelites cried out to the LORD for help; for he had nine hundred chariots of iron, and had oppressed the Israelites cruelly twenty years. Woman as ruler At that time Deborah, a prophetess, wife of Lappidoth, was judging Israel. She used to sit under the palm of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim; and the Israelites came up to her for judgment. She sent and summoned Barak son of Abinoam from Kedesh in Naphtali, and said to him, “The Lord, the God of Israel, commands you, ‘Go, take position at Mount Tabor, bringing ten thousand from the tribe of Naphtali and the tribe of Zebulun. I will draw out Sisera, the general of Jabin’s army, to meet you by the Wadi Kishon with his chariots and his troops; and I will give him into your hand.’” Barak said to her, “If you will go with me, I will go; but if you will not go with me, I will not go.” And she said, “I will surely go with you; nevertheless, the road on which you are going will not lead to your glory, for the Lord will sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.” Then Deborah got up and went with Barak to Kedesh. Barak summoned Zebulun and Naphtali to Kedesh; and ten thousand warriors went up behind him; and Deborah went up with him. Woman as ruler Now Heber the Kenite had separated from the other Kenites,[a] that is, the descendants of Hobab the father-in-law of Moses, and had encamped as far away as Elon-bezaanannim, which is near Kedesh. When Sisera was told that Barak son of Abinoam had gone up to Mount Tabor, Sisera called out all his chariots, nine hundred chariots of iron, and all the troops who were with him, from Harosheth-hagoiim to the Wadi Kishon. Then Deborah said to Barak, “Up! For this is the day on which the Lord has given Sisera into your hand. The Lord is indeed going out before you.” So Barak went down from Mount Tabor with ten thousand warriors following him. And the Lord threw Sisera and all his chariots and all his army into a panic[b] before Barak; Sisera got down from his chariot and fled away on foot, while Barak pursued the chariots and the army to Harosheth-ha-goiim. All the army of Sisera fell by the sword; no one was left. Woman as ruler What in the text indicates that Deborah was an authority over men and women? What in the text indicates that it was God’s will that Deborah be in authority over men and women? How successful was Deborah as a Godly leader over men and women? Was Deborah married? As a married woman, did she speak through her husband or did she speak for herself? Other OT women who decided the fate of Israel in big and small ways: Tamar Hagar Rahab Ruth Esther Woman as disciple Jesus' attitude toward women was radically different from what was customary at the time. Women normally stayed home and attended to domestic duties. But Jesus allowed women to travel with Him and His twelve disciples Woman as disciple John 8:1-3 “Soon afterwards he went on through cities and villages, proclaiming and bringing the good news of the kingdom of God. The twelve were with him, as well as some women who had been cured of evil spirits and infirmities: Mary, called Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out, and Joanna, the wife of Herod’s steward Chuza, and Susanna, and many others, who provided for them out of their resources.” Woman as disciple What is the definition of disciple? a personal follower of Jesus during his life Do Mary Magdalene an other women here fit the definition of disciple? John 8:1-3 “Soon afterwards he went on through cities and villages, proclaiming and bringing the good news of the kingdom of God. The twelve were with him, as well as some women who had been cured of evil spirits and infirmities: Mary, called Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out, and Joanna, the wife of Herod’s steward Chuza, and Susanna, and many others, who provided for them out of their resources.” John 20:1-18 Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene came to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the tomb. So she ran and went to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved, and said to them, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him.” Then Peter and the other disciple set out and went toward the tomb. The two were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. He bent down to look in and saw the linen wrappings lying there, but he did not go in. Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb. He saw the linen wrappings lying there, and the cloth that had been on Jesus’ head, not lying with the linen wrappings but rolled up in a place by itself. Then the other disciple, who reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and believed; for as yet they did not understand the scripture, that he must rise from the dead. Then the disciples returned to their homes. John 20:1-18 But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb. As she wept, she bent over to look into the tomb; and she saw two angels in white, sitting where the body of Jesus had been lying, one at the head and the other at the feet. 13 They said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping?” She said to them, “They have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid him.” 14 When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not know that it was Jesus. 15 Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you looking for?” Supposing him to be the gardener, she said to him, “Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away.” 16 Jesus said to her, “Mary!” She turned and said to him in Hebrew,[b] “Rabbouni!” (which means Teacher). 17 Jesus said to her, “Do not hold on to me, because I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’” 18 Mary Magdalene went and announced to the disciples, “I have seen the Lord”; and she told them that he had said these things to her. Woman as apostle What is an apostle? from Greek apostolos meaning ‘messenger,’ from apostellein ‘send forth.’ What message was Mary Magdalene sent to tell? How significant is that message to the religion of Christianity? Who was the first person sent to tell the message of the Resurrection? Who sent Mary Magdalene? Mary Magdalene is often called “the Apostle to the Apostles” Application So, if the Gospel of John claims that Jesus Christ (God according the Christian doctrine) ordained that a woman should be the first messanger of the Resurrection, to what extent do you think that is a significant indicator of the Christian god’s intended status of women? Woman as subject Ephesians 5:22-33 22 Wives, be subject to your husbands as you are to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife just as Christ is the head of the church, the body of which he is the Savior. 24 Just as the church is subject to Christ, so also wives ought to be, in everything, to their husbands. 25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, 26 in order to make her holy by cleansing her with the washing of water by the word, 27 so as to present the church to himself in splendor, without a spot or wrinkle or anything of the kind—yes, so that she may be holy and without blemish. 28 In the same way, husbands should love their wives as they do their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hates his own body, but he nourishes and tenderly cares for it, just as Christ does for the church, 30 because we are members of his body.[a] 31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.” 32 This is a great mystery, and I am applying it to Christ and the church. 33 Each of you, however, should love his wife as himself, and a wife should respect her husband. The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Although the woman was considered a Roman citizen, she obtained her position only through her husband. Neither slaves nor women could carry their own name. Only men carried this distinct sign of their being a Roman citizen. Moreover, the woman was excluded from all public functions and rights: “Women are excluded from all civil and public functions and therefore can neither be judges nor carry any civil authority, they cannot bring a court case, nor intercede for someone else nor act as mediators”. The woman could not have charge of another person. “Tutela virile officium est” [Tutelage is generally a male duty]. She could not have patronage of her children and cousins (except in 3rd & 4th century Roman Law, after all of the books of the Bible had been written and collected). Women could not function as witnesses, whether at the drawing up of a last will, or in any other form of law. “The woman is incapable of being a witness in any form of jurisprudence where witnesses are required”. Women were reckoned with minors, slaves, the dumb and criminals to be incapable of being witnesses. The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Women could not start a court case without being represented by a man. Women cannot represent themselves in law “because of the infirmity of their sex and because of their ignorance about matters pertaining to public life”. In spite of a slight relaxation in laws which offered more protection to women in the Roman Empire of the 3rd and 4th centuries, the overall inferior status of women remained the same. Since early Church leaders were understandably influenced by Roman culture, morality and subject to Roman Law as the norm for what is right and just, the same negative rules regarding women found their way into Christian thought, practice and law. Building Context When Ephesians was written by Paul to the Church in Ephesus [Greek province of Rome]… Did women have legal rights as individuals (apart from their fathers/husbands) in Ephesus? Given the cultural context of Paul’s writings, why do you think it is that Paul would have instructed Christian wives of Ephesus to honor the legal authority of their husbands? Application In the United States, what are the legal rights of women in relation to men? At work? In marriage? As mothers? Do you think that Paul’s instruction for the women of Ephesus to follow Roman Law in their marriages be applied to American women today? Why or why not? 1 Corinthians 11:5 “…any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled disgraces her head—it is one and the same thing as having her head shaved. For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or to be shaved, she should wear a veil.” Greek and Roman Culture Classical Greek and Hellenistic statues sometimes depict Greek women with both their head and face covered by a veil. Caroline Galt1 and Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones2 have both argued from such representations and literary references that it was commonplace for women (at least those of higher status) in ancient Greece to cover their hair and face in public. Roman women were expected to wear veils as a symbol of the husband's authority over his wife; A married woman who omitted the veil was seen as withdrawing herself from marriage. In 166 BC, consul Sulpicius Gallus divorced his wife because she had left the house unveiled, thus allowing all to see, as he said, what only he should see. Unmarried girls normally didn't veil their heads, but matrons did so to show their modesty and chastity. 1 Professor of Archaeology at Mount Holyoke College (1903–1937) 2Professor of Ancient History at Cardiff University (present) Building Context When 1 Corinthians was written by Paul to the Church in Corinth [a city in the Greek province of Rome]… was it decent for a respectable woman to be seen anywhere without a head covering? Given the cultural context of Paul’s writings, why do you think it is that Paul would have instructed Christian wives of Corinth to wear head coverings in church? Building Context Is it decent for a respectable woman in the United States to be seen without a head covering? Application Do most American churches require women to wear head covering outside of the church walls? Why do you think that is? Do most American churches require women to wear head covering outside of the church walls? Why do you think that is? If most American churches have generally recognized the cultural irrelevance of Paul’s instruction about head covering, why do you it is that American churches have not applied the same logic to a woman’s role in marriage? God-ordained as helpers? Or is Genesis telling us something true about why the world is predominantly patriarchal in nature? Or… ? Hermeneutics By looking at a number of crucial scripture references regarding the status of women in the Bible, which step of the Exegetical Process have we been practicing? Canonical analysis If we were to practice the Secondary Sources step of the Exegetical Process, do you think that we would find a majority of conclusions that God ordained women with inferior status? Why or why not? Christian concept of God Malachi 3:6 (OT) “For I, the Lord, do not change.” Psalm 102:27 (OT) “But You are the same, And Your years will not come to an end.” Hebrews 13:8 (NT) “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” Ezekiel 21 (OT) “The word of the Lord came to me: 2 ‘Son of man, set your face against Jerusalem and preach against the sanctuary. Prophesy against the land of Israel 3 and say to her: “This is what the Lord says: I am against you.”’ Ezekiel 36 (OT) 7 I, the Sovereign Lord, solemnly promise that the surrounding nations will be humiliated. 8 But on the mountains of Israel the trees will again grow leaves and bear fruit for you, my people Israel. You are going to come home soon. 9 I am on your side, and I will make sure that your land is plowed again and crops are planted on it. 10 I will make your population grow. You will live in the cities and rebuild everything that was left in ruins. Revelation 2-3 (NT) Seven Churches are named for their locations. Provides descriptions of each Church. Ephesus (Revelation 2:1-7) the church known for having laboured hard and not fainted, and separating themselves from the wicked; admonished for having forsaken its first love Smyrna (Revelation 2:8-11) the church admired for its tribulation and poverty; forecast to suffer persecution Pergamum (Revelation 2:12-17) the church located at 'Satan's seat'; needed to repent of allowing false teachers Thyatira (Revelation 2:18-29) the church known for its charity, whose "latter works are greater than the former"; held the teachings of a false prophetess Sardis (Revelation 3:1-6) the church that has a good name; cautioned to fortify itself and return to God through repentance (3:2-3) Philadelphia (Revelation 3:7-13) the church steadfast in faith, that had kept God's word and endured patiently (3:10) Laodicea, (Revelation 3:14-22) the church that was lukewarm and insipid (to God) (3:16) Synthesis Christians believe that God does not change over time. Most humans believe (including Christians) that humanity changes over time. According to the NT & OT, does God’s message change over time depending on the changing needs / circumstances of the human audience? Insider vs. Outsider perspective: Insider: God’s message changes depending on the changing needs of the audience. Outsider: the Bible is full of contradictions. How does this Christian understanding of sacred text apply to the discussion on women in sacred text? Is Paul’s message about women different from that of the Jewish writers of Judges (story of Judge / General / Prophetess Deborah)? Insider vs Outsider interpretation? Before we move on to the video… The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review The woman was excluded from all public functions and rights: “Women are excluded from all civil and public functions. Is teaching in a public school a public function? American culture comparison: 76 % of American public school teachers are female The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review She could not have patronage of her children and cousins (except in 3rd & 4th century Roman Law, after all of the books of the Bible had been written and collected). Western Culture today: Do women in most Western nations have legal custody rights to their own children? The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review The woman could not have charge of another person. “Tutela virile officium est” [Tutelage is generally a male duty]. 1 Timothy 2:12 Paul wrote a letter of advice to a young man named Timothy who was pastoring in Ephesus “I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.” Acts 1-2 When they had entered the city, they went to the room upstairs where they were staying, Peter, and John, and James, and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James son of Alphaeus, and Simon the Zealot, and Judas son of[c] James. 14 All these were constantly devoting themselves to prayer, together with certain women, including Mary the mother of Jesus, as well as his brothers…When the day of Pentecost had come, they were all together in one place. 2 And suddenly from heaven there came a sound like the rush of a violent wind, and it filled the entire house where they were sitting. 3 Divided tongues, as of fire, appeared among them, and a tongue rested on each of them. 4 All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages, as the Spirit gave them ability. (Then Peter quotes Joel to the crowd that thinks they’re all drunk) Joel 2 (OT) – Quoted by Peter on the day of Pentecost (NT) Then afterward I will pour out my spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions. 29 Even on the male and female slaves, in those days, I will pour out my spirit. • Is it possible to prophesy without speaking? • Were women speaking on the day of the birth of the Church (Pentecost) according to the apostle Peter? • According to the Bible, who decided who would prophesy on the day of Pentecost? • The Holy Spirit (God chose both women and men to speak for him on the day of the birth of the Church) Women as deacons 1 Timothy 3:8-13 (Paul) 8 In the same way, deacons are to be worthy of respect, sincere, not indulging in much wine, and not pursuing dishonest gain. 9 They must keep hold of the deep truths of the faith with a clear conscience. 10 They must first be tested; and then if there is nothing against them, let them serve as deacons. 11 In the same way, the women are to be worthy of respect, not malicious talkers but temperate and trustworthy in everything. 12 A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children and his household well. 13 Those who have served well gain an excellent standing and great assurance in their faith in Christ Jesus. The only higher position in the church at that time was bishop / “overseer” Romans 16:1-2 (Paul) 16 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church at Cenchreae, 2 so that you may welcome her in the Lord as is fitting for the saints, and help her in whatever she may require from you, for she has been a benefactor of many and of myself as well. Greet Prisca and Aquila, who work with me in Christ Jesus, 4 and who risked their necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles…. Greet Mary, who has worked very hard among you. … Greet Philologus, Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them. ..All the churches of Christ greet you. 17 I urge you, brothers and sisters, to keep an eye on those who cause dissensions and offenses, in opposition to the teaching that you have learned; avoid them. Who is Paul instructing to do what Phoebe requires? Just women? Did Paul prohibit females from having authority in the early church? Women as hosts of house churches Women as hosts of house churches “When he [Peter] realized this, he went to the house of Mary, the mother of John who is called Mark, where there were many people gathered in prayer” (Acts 12:12). “When they [Paul and Silas] had come out of the prison, they went to Lydia’s house where they saw and encouraged the brothers, and then they left” (Acts 16:40). “Give greetings to the brothers in Laodicea and to Nympha and to the church in her house” (Colossians 4:15). Woman as teacher? Paul wrote a letter of advice to a young man named Timothy who was pastoring in Ephesus “I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.” Application: Weighing this text against the other texts in the Biblical canon, would you say that this is an instruction that is temporal [meant for a specific group of people at a specific time] or eternal [meant to be applied to all women at all times]? Roman Catholic The teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, as emphasised by Pope John Paul II in the apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, is "that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgement is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful".[132] This teaching is embodied in the current canon law 1024[133]) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), by the canonical statement: "Only a baptized man (Latin: vir) validly receives sacred ordination."[134] Insofar as priestly and episcopal ordination are concerned, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that this requirement is a matter of divine law; it belongs to the deposit of faith and is unchangeable.[135][136][137] In 2007, the Holy See issued a decree stating that attempted ordination of a woman would result in automatic excommunication for the women and bishops attempting to ordain them,[138] and in 2010, that attempted ordination of women is a "grave delict".[139] An official Papal Commission ordered by Pope Francis in 2016 is charged with determining whether the ancient practice of having female deacons (deaconesses) is possible. Determined: male deacon authority – proclaiming the Gospel at Mass, giving a homily, and performing non-emergency baptisms – would not be permitted for the discussed female diaconate. Protestant Today, over half of all American Protestant denominations ordain women,[127] but some restrict the official positions a woman can hold. For instance, some ordain women for the military or hospital chaplaincy but prohibit them from serving in congregational roles. Over one-third of all seminary students (and in some seminaries nearly half) are female.[128][129] The Protestant denominations that refuse to ordain women often do so on the basis of New Testament scriptures that they interpret as prohibiting women from fulfilling church roles that require ordination.[130] An especially important consideration here is the way 1 Timothy 2:12 is translated and interpreted in the New Testament.[130] Debate on how to best interpret the 1 Timothy verse is intense and ongoing. Arguments regarding context and the Greek words have been used against the literal interpretation of some.[131] Othodox The Orthodox Church follows a line of reasoning similar to that of the Roman Catholic Church with respect to the ordination of bishops and priests, and does not allow women's ordination to those orders.[108] Thomas Hopko and Evangelos Theodorou have contended that female deacons were fully ordained in antiquity.[109] K. K. Fitzgerald has followed and amplified Theodorou's research. Metropolitan Kallistos Ware wrote:[110] The order of deaconesses seems definitely to have been considered an "ordained" ministry during early centuries in at any rate the Christian East. ... Some Orthodox writers regard deaconesses as having been a "lay" ministry. There are strong reasons for rejecting this view. In the Byzantine rite the liturgical office for the laying-on of hands for the deaconess is exactly parallel to that for the deacon; and so on the principle lex orandi, lex credendi— the Church's worshipping practice is a sure indication of its faith—it follows that the deaconesses receives, as does the deacon, a genuine sacramental ordination: not just a χειροθεσια (chirothesia) but a χειροτονια (chirotonia). On October 8, 2004, the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Greece voted to permit the appointment of monastic deaconesses, that is, women to minister and assist at the liturgy within their own monasteries, but it made clear that the rite was a χειροτονία (appointment), not a χειροθεσία (ordination). The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review The woman was excluded from all public functions and rights: “Women are excluded from all civil and public functions. Is teaching in a public school a public function? American culture comparison: 76 % of American public school teachers are female The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review She could not have patronage of her children and cousins (except in 3rd & 4th century Roman Law, after all of the books of the Bible had been written and collected). Western Culture today: Do women in most Western nations have legal custody rights to their own children? The rights of women in general Civil Roman Law Review The woman could not have charge of another person. “Tutela virile officium est” [Tutelage is generally a male duty]. Global comparison today… Today, can women legally take charge of other persons, including men? Today, can women legally take charge of other persons, including men? 43.6% of Senior Lecturer faculty positions in Australia are held by women 36% percent of university professors in the US are women. Margaret Thatcher was a British stateswoman who was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1979 to 1990. She was the longest-serving [democratically elected] British prime minister of the 20th century. A Soviet journalist dubbed her The Iron Lady, for she made her mark in history as a significant force of resistance against the USSR during the Cold War. Does our Western culture consider it categorically scandalous for a woman to take a position of instruction and leadership over adult men? Synthesis If most American churches have generally recognized the cultural irrelevance of Paul’s instruction about head covering, why do you it is that American churches have not as consistently applied the same logic to a woman’s role in marriage? a woman’s role in the church?