
Transmission System
Modeling Data
Requirements and
Reporting Procedures
In Accordance with NERC’s MOD-032-1 Reliability
Standard “Data for Power System Modeling and
Analysis”
Prepared by:
Vito De Luca, Eng.
Effective date:
July 1, 2015
Revision:
1
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Table of Contents
1.
Objective............................................................................................................................. 5
2.
Power System Modeling .................................................................................................... 6
2.1
Power flow and Dynamics Case Building ........................................................................................6
2.2
Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection....................................................................6
2.3
Power System Modeling Workflow and Processes ..........................................................................8
2.3.1
Power System Modeling Workflow ......................................................................................8
2.3.2
Description of Power System Modeling Activities .............................................................10
2.3.3
Case Building Timeline.......................................................................................................11
3.
Modeling of Generating Facilities ....................................................................................12
3.1
Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................12
3.1.1
Steady-State Data Requirements for Generator Modeling ..................................................13
3.1.2
Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Generator Modeling .........................14
3.2
Reporting Procedures .....................................................................................................................17
3.2.1
Data Format.........................................................................................................................17
3.2.2
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................18
4.
Transmission System Equipment ....................................................................................19
4.1
Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................19
4.1.1
Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Requirements ...................................20
4.1.2
Transmission System Equipment Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements ..........23
4.2
Reporting Requirements .................................................................................................................25
4.2.1
Data Format.........................................................................................................................25
4.2.2
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................26
5.
Modeling of Aggregate Demand ......................................................................................27
5.1
Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................27
5.1.1
Steady-State Data Requirements for Demand Modeling ....................................................27
5.1.2
Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Demand Modeling ...........................29
5.2
Reporting Procedures .....................................................................................................................29
5.2.1
Data Format.........................................................................................................................29
5.2.2
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................29
6.
Complementary Power System Information ...................................................................30
6.1
Resource Planning Data..................................................................................................................30
6.1.1
Resource Planning Data Requirements ...............................................................................30
6.1.2
Data Format.........................................................................................................................30
6.1.3
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................30
6.2
Interchange Schedule......................................................................................................................30
6.2.1
Interchange Data Requirements ..........................................................................................31
6.2.2
6.2.3
7.
Data Format ........................................................................................................................ 31
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ......................................................................... 31
Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ....................................................................32
7.1
Data Submission Procedure ........................................................................................................... 32
7.2
Data Submission Schedule............................................................................................................. 33
7.3
Compliance Violations................................................................................................................... 34
REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................35
APPENDIX 1 – Load Data Reporting Templates .......................................................................36
APPENDIX 2 – List of Approved Dynamics Models..................................................................37
A2.1 Standard Library Models .................................................................................................................. 37
A2.2 Approved User-Defined Models....................................................................................................... 41
APPENDIX 3 – Examples of Siemens-PTI PSS/E Model Library Data sheets ......................... 43
APPENDIX 4 – Generator Modeling Data Reporting Template ................................................44
APPENDIX 5 – HQT Bus Numbering and Classification...........................................................45
A5.1 Bus Number Ranges ......................................................................................................................... 45
A5.2 NPCC Area Codes ............................................................................................................................ 46
A5.3 Québec Interconnection Zoning Codes ............................................................................................ 46
APPENDIX 6 – Interchange Data Template ...............................................................................49
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
1. Objective
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (HQT), in its role as Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner,
is charged with the task of maintaining transmission system models (steady-state, dynamics, and
short-circuit) and developing power flow and dynamics cases necessary to support planning studies
and reliability analysis of Québec’s interconnected transmission system. The accuracy of system
models is heavily dependent on the reliability of modeling data collected from the various
functional entities that interface with the transmission system.
The purpose of this document is to establish steady-state, dynamics, and short-circuit modeling data
requirements and reporting procedures, in accordance with NERC’s MOD-032 reliability standard,
“Data for Power System Modeling and Analysis”. The document shall serve as a reference guide to
all functional entities that provide data necessary for system modeling, providing the basic
requirements regarding the type of data required as well as applicable data submission procedures.
It will also describe how entities shall reference and use existing HQT technical documents and
procedures to meet modeling data requirements.
The most updated version of the present document shall be made available to all concerned
functional entities by means of an online posting on HQT’s website, via the following link:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/en/modeling.html.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
5
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
2. Power System Modeling
Power flow and dynamics cases are developed by the Planning Coordinator (PC) in order to
realistically simulate the steady-state and dynamic performance of the Québec interconnected
transmission system. All electrical elements that comprise the transmission system, such as
generating units, power lines, transformers, reactive power compensation equipment, and system
loads, are modeled based on measured electrical parameters (modeling data) provided by various
functional entities within or connected to the transmission system.
2.1 Power flow and Dynamics Case Building
Power flow and dynamics cases are developed using the Siemens Power Technologies Inc. (PTI)
Power System Simulator for Engineers (PSS/E) simulation software. A power flow case is a
collection of steady-state models of generation, transmission system equipment and topology,
short-circuit data, load, dispatch, and interchanges that constitute a snapshot of the selected set of
operating conditions. A dynamics case is a collection of dynamic models used in conjunction with a
power flow case to perform stability analysis of system performance.
The PC develops a series of power flow and dynamics cases (also referred to as base cases) on an
annual basis, reflecting various system conditions and planning scenarios. These cases are used by
the PC and Transmission Planners (TPs) for system studies and reliability analysis. They are also
used by the NPCC through its SS-37 Working Group on Base Case Development. Consequently,
the accuracy of studies and reliability of base cases are heavily dependent on the quality of
modeling data collected from functional entities.
The PC’s annual case building exercise is a structured and detailed process, which is explicitly
outlined in HQT’s base case building manual document entitled “Mise à jour des réseaux
planifiés” as well as in NPCC’s C-29 Document entitled “Procedures for System Modeling: Data
Requirements & Facility Ratings”, available at https://www.npcc.org/Standards/Procedures/c29.pdf.
2.2 Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection
The functional entities, as per MOD-032-1 (part A, section 4.1 “Applicability”), that play key roles
in obtaining, submitting, validating, and maintaining modeling data within the Québec
Interconnection are defined in the following table.
6
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Table 1 – Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection
Functional Entities
Generator Owners (GO)
Names of Organization(s)
•
Canadian Hydro Developers Inc.
•
Cartier Wind Energy Inc.
Role in Power System
Modeling
Provides modeling data for
generating units and generation
outage information.
•
Domtar Inc.
•
Énergie éolienne Le Plateau s.e.c.
(Invenergy Wind LLC)
•
Énergie La Lièvre s.e.c. (Brookfield
Renewable Power)
•
Hydro-Québec Production (HQP)
•
Hydro-Saguenay
•
Manicouagan Power Limited Partnership
(SCHM)
•
NextEra Energy Resources (FPL Group)
•
Northland Power Inc.
•
Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA)
•
Rolls-Royce Canada Limited
•
TransCanada Québec Inc.
•
All other privately owned hydroelectric,
biomass and fossil fuel generating stations,
and windfarms
Load Serving Entity
(LSE)
•
Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD)
Provides aggregate demand
modeling data.
Planning
Authority/Coordinator
(PC)
•
HQT – Direction - Planification
Responsible for Interconnectionwide base case building and
modeling data maintenance (data
storage).
Resource Planner (RP)
•
Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD)
Provides generator dispatching
information based on load-side
contractual obligations.
Transmission Owners
(TO)
•
Arcelor Mittal Montréal
•
Canexus Chemicals Canada Limited
Partnership
Provides modeling data and
outage information of
transmission system equipment.
•
Cedars Rapids Transmission Co. (CRT)
•
Énergie éolienne Le Plateau s.e.c.
(Invenergy Wind LLC)
•
Énergie La Lièvre s.e.c. (Brookfield
Renewable Power)
•
HQT – Direction Principale – Exploitation des
installations
•
Kruger Inc. (Trois-Rivières)
•
Manicouagan Power Limited Partnership
(SCHM)
•
PPG Canada Inc.
•
Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA)
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
7
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission Planners
(TP)
•
HQT – Direction - Planification
Users of base cases for system
studies.
Transmission Service
Providers (TSP)
•
HQT - Direction – Commercialisation et
affaires règlementaires
•
Cedars Rapids Transmission Co. (CRT)
Provides transmission service
customer contract data (point-topoint transmission service details)
as published on OASIS.
2.3 Power System Modeling Workflow and Processes
2.3.1 Power System Modeling Workflow
The PC’s annual exercise of developing reliable base cases is an intricate process requiring active
inter-organizational collaboration from all function entities.
The following figure illustrates a general overview of how the functional entities listed above shall
interact in regards to the submittal and processing of modeling data within the Québec
Interconnection.
8
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Figure 1 – Planning Coordinator Modeling Data Workflow
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
9
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
2.3.2 Description of Power System Modeling Activities
As illustrated above, power system modeling is comprised of a sequence of modeling data
submission, validation and processing activities required to produce interconnection-wide base
cases suitable for system studies. Modeling data is collected from various functional entities,
validated to ensure functionality and compatibility with simulation tools, and then entered into
specific data bases for referencing and base case building.
Essentially, case building is achieved based on the following inputs:
1. Steady-state and Short-circuit Modeling Data from PSS® Model on Demand (MOD)
Database
The MOD database consolidates all generation and transmission system steady-state and
short-circuit modelling data (including planned future projects) collected from various
functional entities in a central data repository. MOD is synched with DSR, the PC’s main
equipment data base containing updated modeling data of all existing generating and
transmission system facilities, producing a MOD base case scenario in PSS/E format (.sav).
Future projects, consisting of generation or transmission system additions, upgrades or
modifications, are submitted to the PC by TPs and stored in MOD. They are then applied to
the MOD base case scenario, allowing the PC and TPs to customize planning cases for any
desired future point in time.
Corrections or modifications to modeling data for existing facilities are validated before
data is updated in the DSR database. In the case of future projects, preliminary modeling
data submitted by GOs, TOs and TPs are entered directly into MOD, after model validation
by the PC. New generating units or transmission system equipment are only added to DSR
after project commissioning and after the PC has received all updated modeling data. This
updated data is obtained from GOs and TOs at the later stages of the project commissioning
phase.
2. Dynamics Models and Modeling Parameters
Validated dynamics models and modeling parameters of existing facilities and future
projects collected from GOs, TOs and TPs are stored in the PC’s dynamics library. The
PC’s dynamics library consists of all dynamics model files required to run dynamics
simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll, etc.), source code files for certain user-defined
models, dynamics parameters in the form of DYR files, and any IDEV or PYTHON
programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation parameters.
3. Aggregate Demand Data
Once aggregate demand data for each load-serving bus is received from the LSE, the PC
validates and processes the data, mapping load data to the appropriate load serving buses in
the MOD base case. The validated data is then stored in the PC’s Load Forecast Database
which is used to produce load profiles for a given forecast year in the form of PYTHON
10
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
automation files. These files are applied to the MOD base case scenario to produce
customized planning cases for any desired future point in time.
4. Resource Data
The RP, in collaboration with GOs, provide the PC with data regarding all available
resources needed to fulfill LSE demand requirements. This allows the PC to produce
realistic generation dispatch scenarios, adequately balancing load and generation.
5. Interchange Data from TSPs
When preparing a base case scenario, the PC must consider scheduled MW transfer levels at
each inter-area interconnection facility. Interchange data used in base case building is based
on transmission service customer contract data (point-to-point transmission service details)
as published on OASIS, as well as the NPCC Interchange Schedule prepared annually by
NPCC’s SS37 work group.
6. Equipment Outage Information
Planned maintenance or commissioning of generating units and transmission system
equipment resulting in outages must be considered in base case development. Short-term
generator outages are reported to the PC by GOs and transmission system equipment
outages are reported by the TOs.
2.3.3 Case Building Timeline
The modeling data produced by the power system modeling activities described above are
assembled during case building according to the timeline illustrated in the following figure.
June 1st
Phase 1 of
Load Data
Collection
March 1st
Reporting deadline
for new future
projects and
modifications to
existing modeling
data (DSR & MOD)
January 15th
Start of Annual
Case Building
Exercise
(Winter Peak)
October 1st
Phase 2 of
Load Data
Collection
(All data)
February 1st
Generation
Modeling Data
Collection
May 1st
Delivery of
finalized
Power flow
and dynamics
base cases
April 1st
Integration of
complementary power
system information
(Outage, resource
allocation and
Interchange data)
Figure 2 - Case Building Timeline
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
11
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
3. Modeling of Generating Facilities
3.1 Modeling Data Requirements
All Generator Owners (GOs) connected to the Québec interconnected transmission system must
provide valid modeling data of existing and future generating units to the PC on an annual basis.
The PC also requires GOs of existing facilities to recertify generator modeling data on an annual
basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling data or by certifying that data has not changed
from the previous year’s data submission. In the case of changes to modeling data, GOs must
clearly identify all changes and submit all modified modeling data in accordance with the
requirements herein.
For new or future planned generating units, generator modeling data shall be submitted 1) during
the project’s planning phase, normally 3-5 years prior to commissioning, and 2) immediately after
project commissioning.
1- Project Planning Phase Data
The PC and TPs initially collect approximated generator modeling data from new and
prospective GOs in order to conduct interconnection or system impact studies prior to
commissioning of generating facilities. This preliminary data is submitted to the PC and TPs in
conjunction with GOs’ request for system impact studies, as described in section 3 of HQT’s
technical requirements document and in HQT’s Procedure document for the connection of new
generating units, available (in French) on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/demarche-a-suivre-2012.pdf.
2- Post-commissioning Data
GOs shall update the preliminary data provided to the PC and TPs during the project planning
phase by providing actual or measured modeling parameters. GOs must conduct data
validation testing in order to validate modeling data as well as demonstrate that their facilities
meet the requirements set out in the document “Transmission Provider Technical Requirements
for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System”, available on
HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_e
n.pdf.
The validation procedures and testing for wind farms are outlined in HQT’s “General Validation
Test Program for Wind Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System”
document, available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/essais-eoliennes2011-en.pdf
12
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
The validation of modeling data is a prerequisite for final TO acceptance of the generating facility
project and must be completed within 6 months of initial commercial commissioning.
GOs of generating units with capacities less than 10 MW that are connected at the distribution
network level are not required to provide detailed modeling data unless specifically requested by
TPs or the PC for system studies purposes.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to
effectively model all generating units within the Québec interconnected transmission system,
defining the type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
3.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Generator Modeling
i.
In general, generator owners shall provide steady-state modeling data of existing and
prospective generating units according to the requirements set forth in Appendix A of
HQT’s technical requirements document entitled “Transmission Provider Technical
Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission
System”. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website
at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_0
9_en.pdf.
ii.
The table below summarizes the main steady-state data requirements, as outlined in MOD032-01, A1-3.
Table 2 – Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements for Generator Modeling
Generator Unit
Component
Synchronous/Asynchronous
Generators
Generator Step-Up
Transformers *
*
Steady-State Modeling Data Requirements
•
Generator type (hydroelectric, thermal, wind, etc.)
•
Real power capabilities (maximum and minimum values in
MW)
•
Reactive power capabilities (maximum and minimum
values in MVAR)
•
Machine MVA base
•
Generator unit regulated bus and set point voltage
•
Machine grounding impedances
•
In-service status
•
Number of transformers
•
Nominal voltages of windings (kV)
•
Rated power (MVA)
•
Power ratings (MVA) with corresponding cooling method
•
Positive sequence impedances and winding resistance
(Ohms or p.u.)
This data shall be provided by the owner of generator step-up transformers, which can be the GO or the TO.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
13
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Wind Farm Collector Network
Equipment
•
Coupling (winding connection)
•
Number of tap positions (kV or p.u.)
•
Tap ratios (voltage or phase angle)
•
Minimum and maximum tap position limits
•
Regulated bus (for voltage regulating transformers)
•
In-service status
•
Transmission line impedance parameters (ohms or p.u.)
•
Transmission line admittance (siemens or p.u.)
•
Transmission line ratings (MVA or A)
•
Capacitor/Inductor number, in-service status, reactive
power ratings and voltage.
iii.
For future planned generating units, GOs shall provide the expected commissioning date.
iv.
GOs shall also provide generating station service auxiliary load information for existing
units, detailing real (MW) and reactive power (MVAR) load values associated with a given
generating unit.
v.
In regards to “in-service status”, a 10-year forecast of scheduled outages of duration greater
than 6 months shall be provided by GOs on a yearly basis. Outage information shall consist
of:
•
Start and end dates of planned outage
•
Generating unit(s) and/or specific equipment within generation facility scheduled to
be out of service.
•
Impact of outage on generation (i.e. reduction in power plant generation in MW)
3.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Generator Modeling
i.
In general, GOs shall provide short-circuit and dynamics modeling data of existing and
future planned generating units according to the requirements set forth in Appendices A and
B of HQT’s technical requirements document entitled “Transmission Provider Technical
Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission
System”. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website
at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_0
9_en.pdf.
ii.
In order to accurately simulate dynamic performance of generating units, GOs must provide
the PC with validated dynamics models and associated parameters of all power generating
equipment and components of the power plant, including:
•
14
Generators, including Wind Turbines, Photovoltaic Systems, Fuel Cells and any
other resource that delivers MW to the electric power system.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
iii.
•
Excitation systems
•
Turbine and speed governors
•
Voltage regulators (if equipped)
•
Power system stabilizers (if equipped)
All dynamics models submitted to the PC must be based on standard IEEE models and must
be compatible with the current version of Siemens-PTI’s PSS/E (Power System Simulator
for Engineers) software, which is used by the PC and TPs for dynamics system studies.
The use of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models is preferred when they can
accurately represent the dynamic performance of the device being modeled.
A list of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models as well as all user-defined models
approved by the PC for use in dynamic simulations is listed in Appendix 2 of the present
document.
iv.
User-defined models
a) In the event that a compatible standard IEEE or PSS/E dynamics model is
unavailable, user-defined or “black-box” models may be used. A user-defined
model is any model that is not a standard Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model but has
been accepted by the PC after being successfully tested for compatibility.
b) User-defined models submitted to the PC shall fulfill the following requirements:
• User-defined models must be able to work with a time-step exceeding 4 ms.
• User-defined models must be accompanied by a user manual providing all
relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the model, including
block diagrams, values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state
variables.
• GOs must also provide compliance test results demonstrating that the model
accurately represents the dynamic performance of the device being modeled. GOs
must ensure that model compliance testing is performed every 10 years.
c) GOs are responsible for validating and maintaining all dynamics models, ensuring
that models submitted to the PC are compatible and fully functional in the current
version of PSS/E, allowing for error-free initialization. In the event of PSS/E version
updates (PC migrates to a newer version of the PSS/E software), GOs shall provide
all necessary model updates, ensuring all models are compatible with the new
version of PSS/E.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
15
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
d) In the case of user-defined models representing wind farms, the following
requirements shall be observed:
• Validation of wind turbine models shall be conducted using HQT’s
“Procedure for PSS/E model validation” document, available on HQT’s
website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/procedurevalidation-modeles-psse-en.pdf
Test base cases are also available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/zip/procedurevalidation-eolien-v32.zip.
• The user-defined model must allow wind turbines to be represented as a single
generator and must be functional across its entire range of real and reactive
power.
• In the case where voltage regulation of a wind power plant is achieved by
means of additional compensation equipment in the switchyard, the GO shall
also provide the complete PSS/E model for the corresponding reactive power
compensation equipment, including all associated technical documentation,
modeling data and parameters.
e) In addition to providing all required data for user-defined models as stipulated in
3.1.2.iv above, GOs must also identify the Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library
model(s) that most closely represents the dynamic performance of the user-defined
model, as well as provide the corresponding modeling parameters. GOs may refer to
the list of accepted models presented in Appendix 2.
v.
When submitting model parameters, GOs shall indicate the source of the data reported
(manufacturer technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical
values, etc.).
vi.
In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, GOs shall provide the PC with
estimated values based on the GO’s assumptions and hypotheses. All estimated values shall
be clearly indicated as such.
vii.
In regards to under/over-frequency protection of generating units, all GOs shall provide
under/over-frequency relay data, specifically generator unit protection relay trip settings and
time delay, as described in NERC’s PRC-006-1 standard “Automatic Underfrequency Load
Shedding”.
16
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
3.2 Reporting Procedures
3.2.1 Data Format
i.
ii.
iii.
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data shall be submitted to the PC in one of the
following formats:
•
Table format: Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all
corresponding model parameters are provided in a table format. GOs with numerous
generating units may use the sample modeling data reporting table provided in
Appendix 4 of the present document.
•
PSS/E Library Data Sheets: GOs using Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library
models may also elect to submit modeling parameters using the corresponding
Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model data sheets. These data sheets may be provided to
the GO upon request. An example of a PSS/E library model data sheet is included in
Appendix 3.
•
PSS/E RAW, DYR format: PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all
corresponding steady-state and dynamics parameters are provided in RAW and
DYR files, respectively.
In the case of user-defined models, GOs shall submit:
•
All associated model files required to run simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll,
etc.). The PC may request the source code for certain user-defined models, which
must be submitted in the FLECS language of the current PSS/E revision, in C, or in
FORTRAN.
•
All corresponding user-defined model steady-state and dynamics parameters,
provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
•
All relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the user-defined model,
including compliance test results, block diagrams, values and names for all model
parameters and a list of all state variables.
•
Any IDEV or PYTHON programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation
parameters.
•
The Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model that most closely represents the
generating unit’s dynamics performance, along with all corresponding model
parameters.
GOs shall provide generator outage information in an Excel table format.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
17
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
3.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i.
18
Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule
described in section 7.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
4. Transmission System Equipment
4.1 Modeling Data Requirements
All Transmission Owners within the Québec Interconnection shall provide the PC with valid
modeling data of all existing and future transmission system equipment, including:
•
AC transmission lines
•
DC transmission systems
•
Voltage and phase shifting transformers
•
Breakers
•
Shunt reactive compensation equipment (capacitors and reactors)
•
Series reactive compensation equipment
•
Static Var systems and synchronous condensers
•
Special protection systems (SPS)
The PC, in accordance with NERC’s MOD-032 standard, requires all TOs of existing facilities to
recertify system modeling data on an annual basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling
data or by certifying that data has not changed from the previous year’s data submission. In the case
of changes to modeling data, TOs must clearly identify all changes and submit all modified
modeling data in accordance with the requirements herein.
For future planned modifications, additions or upgrades of transmission system equipment, TOs
must submit preliminary modeling data to the PC and TPs during the planning phase of the project,
during which system impact studies are conducted. This data is generally submitted to the PC and
TPs approximately 3-5 years prior to project commissioning. At this stage, estimated or typical
modeling parameters are acceptable.
TOs shall update the preliminary data provided to the PC during the project planning phase by
providing actual or measured modeling parameters based on equipment compliance testing results
conducted during the commissioning phase. The validation of modeling data is a prerequisite for
final TO acceptance of the transmission system facility project and must be completed within 6
months of initial commercial commissioning.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to
effectively model transmission system equipment within the Québec Interconnection, defining the
type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
19
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
4.1.1 Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Requirements
i.
Each TO shall provide steady-state modeling data of existing and future transmission
equipment according to the requirements set forth in the present document.
ii.
The table below summarizes the main steady-state data requirements, as outlined in MOD032-01, A1- 1, 4-8.
Table 3 – Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements
Transmission System
Component
Buses
AC Transmission Lines
DC Transmission Systems
(DC lines and converter
stations)
Transformers (Voltage and
Phase Shifting)
20
Steady-State Modeling Data Requirements
•
Bus numbers and alphanumeric names
•
Nominal voltage
•
Type of bus (substation bus bar, load or generator)
•
Area, zone and owner
•
Associated substation or line
•
To and from buses or substations
•
Line length (km)
•
Impedance parameters, R and X (ohms or p.u.)
•
Susceptance, B (siemens or p.u.)
•
Thermal ratings at -20⁰C, 0⁰C and 30⁰C (MVA or A)
•
In-service status
•
To and from buses or substations
•
DC Line length (km)
•
DC Line impedances and data (Voltage, Rcmp-Ohms,
Vcmode, CCC Itmax, Rdc-Ohms, Delti, Dcvmin, CCC
Accel)
•
Rectifier and Inverter data (Primary base voltage, Bridges
in Series, Trans Ratio, CCC X, AC Tx From Bus, AC Tx
To Bus, Max Firing Angle, Commutating R and X, Max &
Min Tap Settings, Tap Step)
•
In-service status
•
Location of transformer (substation name)
•
Transformer name (ID number) and assigned position
number
•
Nominal voltages of primary, secondary and tertiary
windings (kV)
•
Impedance parameters, R and X (p.u.)
•
Magnetizing admittance G and susceptance B (p.u.)
•
Nominal MVA base
•
Tap ratios (voltage or phase angle)
•
Minimum and maximum tap position limits
•
Number of tap positions
•
Regulated bus (for voltage regulated transformers)
•
Capacity ratings at -20⁰C, 0⁰C and 30⁰C (MVA)
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Breakers
Shunt Reactive
Compensation Devices
(Capacitors and Reactors)
Series Reactive
Compensation Devices
Static Var Systems and
Synchronous Condensers
iii.
•
In-service status
•
Location of breaker (substation name)
•
Breaker name (ID number) and assigned position number
•
Nominal voltage (kV)
•
Manufacturing data (manufacturer, year, design standard)
•
Breaker interrupting symmetrical and asymmetrical
current capacities (kA)
•
Breaker X/R ratio
•
Location of shunt unit (substation name)
•
Shunt unit name (ID number) and assigned position
number
•
Number of capacitors and reactors in unit
•
Reactive power capacity of each capacitor and reactor
(MVAR)
•
Rated voltage (kV)
•
Regulated voltage band limits (kV)
•
Mode of operation (fixed, discrete, continuous, etc.)
•
Regulated bus
•
In-service status
•
Location of series capacitor (substation name and
transmission line compensated)
•
Series capacitor unit name
•
Unit type
•
Rated voltage (kV)
•
Unit impedance (p.u. or ohms)
•
Unit admittance (p.u. or siemens)
•
Reactive compensation %
•
Reactive power capacity (MVA)
•
Overload factor
•
In-service status
•
Location of Static VAR or Synchronous Condenser
(substation name)
•
Rated voltage (kV)
•
Machine MVA base
•
Reactive power limits (MVAR)
•
Regulated bus
•
Voltage set point (p.u. or kV)
•
In-service status
Attribution of bus numbers and associated bus data must be consistent with the PC’s bus
numbering and naming practices presented in the table below:
Table 4 – HQT Bus Numbering and Naming Practices
Bus Data
Bus Number
Bus Numbering and Naming Practices
•
Bus numbers must be unique for all buses in the Québec
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
21
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Interconnection.
Bus Name
•
Bus numbers must be attributed in accordance to the assigned
bus number ranges presented in Appendix 5.
•
Bus names are descriptive names given to buses in PSS/E
•
Bus names must be unique for all buses in the Québec
Interconnection and must not exceed 8 alphanumeric
characters.
•
By convention, bus names must be in the following format:
ABC123-1 or ABC123-A
In general, the first 3 characters are letters relating to the name
of the substation where the bus is located, and the next 3
characters are numbers denoting the nominal voltage level of
the bus. A dash and a number or letter may be added at the end
of the name in order to help differentiate between multiple buses
with the same first 6 characters.
For example, according to the naming practice, the PSS/E
names of two 315 kV bus bars at the Duvernay substation would
be DUV315-1 and DUV315-2.
Bus Location
•
For each bus in the transmission system, an Area number, Zone
number and Owner name/number must be specified.
•
Area refers to the NPCC Area where a given bus is located. For
example, buses of the HQT transmission system are located in
the HQTÉ Area denoted by number 104.
•
Zone refers to the specific geographic region within the Québec
Interconnection.
•
Owner refers to the specific transmission owner responsible for
a given bus.
•
A complete listing of all available Area and Zone number codes
are presented in Appendix 5.
iv.
Transmission owners shall also provide substation service auxiliary load information for
existing substations, detailing real (MW) and reactive power (MVAR) load values
associated with a given substation.
v.
For all future additions or upgrades where HQT is TO, steady-state modeling data shall
reflect technical data specified in the Design Specifications Document (cahier des charges).
vi.
In regards to “in-service status”, transmission system equipment outages for the upcoming
year of duration greater than 6 months shall be provided by the TO on a yearly basis.
Outage information shall consist of:
22
•
Start and end dates of planned outage
•
Transmission equipment scheduled to be out of service
•
Voltage level
•
Location (substation name, zone, etc.)
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
•
Description of project or maintenance causing outage
4.1.2 Transmission System Equipment Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data
Requirements
i.
Each TO shall provide short-circuit and dynamics modeling data of existing and future
transmission equipment according to the requirements set forth in the present document.
ii.
The table below summarizes the main short-circuit and dynamics modeling data
requirements, as outlined in MOD-032-01, A1.
Table 5 – Transmission System Equipment Short-circuit and Dynamic Data Reporting Requirements
Transmission System
Component
Dynamics and Short-Circuit Modeling Data
Requirements
•
Zero sequence impedance parameters, R and X
(ohms or p.u.)
•
Zero sequence susceptance, B (siemens or p.u.)
DC Transmission Systems (DC
lines and converter stations)
•
DC line dynamics model and associated parameters
•
DC converter dynamics model and associated
parameters
Transformers (Voltage and Phase
Shifting)
•
Winding connection
•
Zero sequence impedance parameters, R and X
(ohms or p.u.)
•
Zero sequence grounding impedances, RG and XG
(ohms or p.u.)
Shunt Reactive Compensation
Devices (Capacitors and
Reactors)
•
Zero sequence shunt admittances, G and B (p.u.)
Series Reactive Compensation
Devices
•
Zero sequence impedances, R and X (p.u. or ohms)
•
Zero sequence admittance, B (p.u. or siemens)
•
Unit admittance (p.u. or siemens)
•
Positive sequence machine impedances, R1 and X1
(p.u.)
•
Negative sequence machine impedances, R2 and X2
(p.u.)
•
Zero sequence machine impedances, R0 and X0
(p.u.)
•
Static Var System equipment dynamics model and
associated parameters
•
Synchronous Condenser dynamics model and
associated parameters
•
SPS dynamics model and associated parameters
AC Transmission Lines
Static Var Systems and
Synchronous Condensers
Special protection systems (SPS)
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
23
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
iii.
All dynamics models submitted to the PC must be based on standard IEEE models and must
be compatible with the current version of Siemens-PTI’s PSS/E (Power System Simulator
for Engineers) software, which is used by the PC and TPs for dynamics system studies.
The use of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models is preferred when they can
accurately represent the dynamic performance of the device being modeled.
A list of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models as well as all user-defined models
approved by the PC for use in dynamic simulations is listed in Appendix 2 of the present
document.
iv.
In the event that a compatible standard IEEE or PSS/E dynamics model is unavailable, userdefined or “black-box” models may be used. A user-defined model is any model that is not
a standard Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model but has been accepted by the PC after being
successfully tested for compatibility.
v.
User-defined models submitted to the PC shall fulfill the following requirements:
•
User-defined models must be able to work with a time-step exceeding 4 ms.
•
User-defined models must be accompanied by a user manual providing all relevant
technical documentation and characteristics of the model, including block diagrams,
values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state variables.
•
TOs must also provide compliance test results demonstrating that the model
accurately represents the dynamic performance of the device being modeled. TOs
must ensure that model compliance testing is performed every 10 years.
vi.
TOs are responsible for validating and maintaining all dynamics models, ensuring that
models submitted to the PC are compatible and fully functional in the current version of
PSS/E, allowing for error-free initialization. In the event of PSS/E version updates (PC
migrates to a newer version of the PSS/E software), TOs shall provide all necessary model
updates, ensuring all models are compatible with the new version of PSS/E.
vii.
In addition to providing all required data for user-defined models as stipulated in 4.1.2.iv-vi,
TOs must also identify the Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model(s) that most closely
represents the dynamic performance of the user-defined model, as well as provide the
corresponding modeling parameters. TOs may refer to the list of accepted models presented
in Appendix 2.
viii.
When submitting model parameters, TOs shall indicate the source of the data reported
(manufacturer technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical
values, etc.).
24
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
ix.
In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, TOs shall provide the PC with
estimated values based on the TO’s assumptions and hypotheses. All estimated values shall
be clearly indicated as such.
x.
For all future additions or upgrades where HQT is TO, short-circuit modeling data shall
reflect technical data specified in the Design Specifications Document (cahier des charges).
4.2 Reporting Requirements
4.2.1 Data Format
iv.
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data shall be submitted to the PC in one of the
following formats:
•
Table format: Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all
corresponding model parameters are provided in a table format.
•
Manufacturer Testing Reports: Modeling parameters may be submitted in the
form of a report, presenting results from the manufacturer’s technical compliance
testing.
•
PSS/E Library Data Sheets: TOs using Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library
models may also elect to submit modeling parameters using the corresponding
Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model data sheets. These data sheets may be provided to
the TO upon request. An example of a PSS/E library model data sheet is included in
Appendix 3.
•
PSS/E RAW, DYR format: PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all
corresponding steady-state and dynamics parameters are provided in RAW and
DYR files, respectively.
•
Siemens PSS®MOD format: This form of data reporting is only applicable to
HQT. Future projects or modifications shall be submitted to the PC in the form of
MOD *.prj files or entered directly into HQT’s MOD database, available online at:
http://131.195.100.81/MODWeb/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fmodweb%2fDefault.asp
x.
v.
TOs shall also submit a one-line diagram, illustrating the planned or commissioned
transmission system additions and/or modifications.
vi.
In the case of user-defined models, TOs shall submit:
•
All associated model files required to run simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll,
etc.). The PC may request the source code for certain user-defined models, which
must be submitted in the FLECS language of the current PSS/E revision, in C, or in
FORTRAN.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
25
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
vii.
•
All corresponding user-defined model steady-state and dynamics parameters,
provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
•
All relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the user-defined model,
including compliance test results, block diagrams, values and names for all model
parameters and a list of all state variables.
•
Any IDEV or PYTHON programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation
parameters.
•
The Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model that most closely represents the
generating unit’s dynamics performance, along with all corresponding model
parameters.
The TO shall provide transmission system equipment outage information in the form of a
report or a simplified Excel table.
4.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i.
26
Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule
described in section 7.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
5. Modeling of Aggregate Demand
5.1 Modeling Data Requirements
The main Load Serving Entity (LSE), in this case Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD), is
responsible for preparing and submitting demand data to the Planning Coordinator (PC) for the
entire Québec Interconnection. This data is based on demand forecasts prepared and/or assembled
on an annual basis by all LSEs.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to
effectively model demand within the interconnected transmission system, defining the type of data
required and the units this data is to be reported in.
5.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Demand Modeling
i.
Steady-state load data shall be submitted to the PC, listing forecasted aggregated load data
at each load-serving bus bar for each year of a given demand forecast.
ii.
The LSE shall also provide Interconnection-wide total demand forecasts, summing
substation, customer facility and substation auxiliary load data.
iii.
Demand forecasts shall be prepared and submitted to the PC in accordance with HQD-HQT
agreements (“Ententes sectorielles”) 1, 3 and 6, available at http://transenergie.hydro.qc.ca/
planification_expertise_aff_reglementaires/528.htm, and in compliance with NERC
standards MOD-016, MOD-017, MOD-018, MOD-019, MOD-020, MOD-021.
The table below summarizes the steady-state data requirements outlined in the HQD-HQT
agreements for loads modeled at satellite substation feeder buses (< 44 kV) and loads
representing customer facilities (large industrial plants, pulp and paper mills, aluminum
smelters, refineries, mining facilities, etc.), directly connected to the high voltage
transmission system (44 kV to 324 kV).
Table 6 – Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements for Demand Modeling
Loads at satellite substation feeder
buses < 44 KV
(15 year forecast)
Customer facility loads at buses > 44 kV
(10 year forecast)

Bus number

Bus number

Substation name

Customer facility name

Real power (MW)

Expected real power (MW)

Reactive power (MVAR)

Total load apparent power (MVA)

Load apparent power (MVA)

Load in-service status

Rated power (MVA) and voltage (kV) of
low-voltage side reactive compensation

Number of shunt capacitors and reactors

Rated power (MVA) and voltage (kV) of each
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
27
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
equipment
iv.
v.
reactive compensation equipment

Reactive compensation equipment in-service
status

Quantity of interruptible load
In general, load data submitted to the PC shall reflect the following annually prepared
demand forecasts:
•
A 15-year aggregate demand forecast for all load-serving satellite substations within
the Hydro-Québec Distribution system with secondary bus voltages less than 44 kV.
•
A 15-year aggregate demand forecast for all load-serving substations belonging to
independent municipal distribution systems with secondary bus voltages less than 44
kV.
•
A 10-year estimated demand forecast for industrial customer facilities (large
industrial plants, pulp and paper mills, aluminum smelters, refineries, mining
facilities, etc.), directly connected to the high voltage transmission system (44 kV to
324 kV).
•
A 10-year Interconnection-wide aggregated demand forecast for all three categories
listed above.
Each demand forecast shall provide load data for the following types of load levels:
•
Winter Peak Load
•
Summer Peak Load
•
Summer Light Load
vi.
According to HQD-HQT Agreement #1, Part 2, Article 1, HQD must also provide historical
load data based on meter readings at each load-serving satellite substation.
vii.
In the case of new customer facilities connected directly to the high voltage transmission
system, the submission of more detailed modeling information is required prior to the
commissioning of new customer facilities, as stipulated in the PC’s “Technical
Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission
System” document. The most updated version of the document is readily available on
HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
viii.
28
Existing customer facilities must also provide load modeling data according to these same
technical requirements upon request from the PC or in the event of any modifications to
customer facilities.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
5.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Demand Modeling
i.
Short-circuit and dynamics data is normally required for customer facilities equipped with
large motors that can impact the transmission system’s transient and dynamic performance.
This information is normally provided by customer facilities prior to commissioning and
connection to the transmission system or in the event of modifications to existing customer
facilities.
ii.
Customer facilities, with the collaboration of HQD, shall provide short-circuit and dynamics
data according to the requirements set forth in Appendix 1 of HQT’s “Technical
Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission
System” document. The most updated version of the document is readily available on
HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
iii.
Customer facilities must also indicate the source of the data submitted (manufacturer
technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical values, etc.).
iv.
In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, HQD/Customer facilities are
responsible for providing theoretical or estimated values.
5.2 Reporting Procedures
5.2.1 Data Format
i.
Steady-state load data submitted to the PC shall be presented in an Excel table format
similar to the sample tables provided in Appendix 1, as stipulated in HQD-HQT Agreement
#1, Part 2, Articles 2 and 4.
ii.
Short-circuit and dynamic load data shall be submitted to the PC using the modeling data
template provided in Appendix A of the “Technical Requirements for Customer Facilities
Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System” document. All fields of the said
document must be completed in order to be considered as a valid data submission. Other
accepted data submission formats for short-circuit and dynamic load data are the following:
•
Excel Table listing model parameters
•
PSS/E RAW and DYR files, with all corresponding PSS/E dynamic model files.
5.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i.
Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule
described in section 7.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
29
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
6. Complementary Power System Information
In addition to steady-state and dynamics models, power flow and dynamics cases require
quantitative power system information in order to set generation dispatch and inter-area transfer
levels. This additional information consists of resource planning data and interchange transfer
quantities to neighbouring Areas.
The following sections present the data required to effectively integrate resource planning and
interchange data into power flow and dynamics cases, defining the type of data required and the
units this data is to be reported in.
6.1 Resource Planning Data
6.1.1 Resource Planning Data Requirements
i.
The Resource Planner (RP), in this case Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD), shall provide
the PC with data regarding all long term generation purchasing agreements between GOs
and LSEs, determining the generating resources available to fulfill demand requirements.
ii.
This data shall be prepared and submitted to the PC in accordance with HQD-HQT
agreements (“Ententes sectorielles”) 1, 3 and 6, available at http://transenergie.hydro.qc.ca/
planification_expertise_aff_reglementaires/528.htm
6.1.2 Data Format
i.
Resource data shall be reported in an Excel table format, as specified in the above
mentioned HQD-HQT agreements.
6.1.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i.
Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule
described in section 7.
6.2 Interchange Schedule
An Interchange schedule is a list of scheduled power transfer quantities exchanged between the
Québec Interconnection and its neighbouring Area systems (i.e. New England, New York, Ontario,
and New Brunswick). These transactions and transmission reservations reflect firm export/import
or point-to-point transmission agreements, as per HQT’s Open Access Transmission Tariff
(OATT). This information is published on the OATI webOASIS application and provided to the PC
by the Transmission Service Provider (TSP).
30
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
6.2.1 Interchange Data Requirements
i.
The TSP shall collect and provide the required interchange data regarding all point-to-point
transmission agreements, transmission reservations and spot trades between TOs within the
Québec Interconnection as well as TOs of neighbouring NPCC Areas. This information
must be reflective of the most updated transaction information available on OASIS.
ii.
Interchange data shall include:
•
Transmission service customer name
•
OASIS reference number
•
Source and destination substations
•
Name of interconnection path
•
Transaction quantity (MW)
•
Transaction frequency (yearly, monthly, etc.)
•
Transmission service type
•
Start and end date of transmission service contract
6.2.2 Data Format
i.
Interchange data shall be reported in an Excel table format, similar to the sample table in
Appendix 6.
6.2.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i.
Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule
described in section 7.
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
31
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
7. Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
7.1 Data Submission Procedure
i.
All communication regarding modeling data submission shall be sent to the following email
address: te_donneesdemodelisation@hydro.qc.ca.
ii.
Data submission is to be performed electronically by email, preferably using a secure file
transfer server such as Hydro-Québec’s secure FTP server, available to HQ entities at
https://ftps.hydro.qc.ca/ and external clients at https://ftps.hydroquebec.com/.
iii.
TOs owned by HQT may also submit modeling data using Hydro-Québec’s file storage
software, Hydro-Doc (Enterprise Connect) or enter future project data directly into MOD
using the MOD online application, available at:
http://131.195.100.81/MODWeb/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fmodweb%2fDefault.aspx
iv.
Recertification Process
As stipulated in sections 3.1 and 4.1 of the present document, in addition to reporting
additions or modifications to modeling data, GOs and TOs of existing facilities must
recertify that existing unchanged modeling data is valid. This recertification of modeling
data shall be performed on an annual basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling
data or by submitting a written confirmation that data has not changed from the previous
year’s data submission. The recertification process is presented as follows:
v.
32
•
Request for recertification: Every year, the PC shall send an email to GOs and
TOs requesting the recertification of modeling data for existing generators and
transmission system equipment 90 calendar days prior to scheduled data submission
deadlines. The PC’s request for recertification will include the modeling information
currently maintained by the PC in DSR and MOD.
•
Recertification response: Recertification of modeling data or information
indicating changes to modeling data shall be provided to the PC prior to the data
reporting deadline. GOs and TOs must identify all changes or updates to modeling
data (including model compatibility updates for PSS/E version upgrades) and submit
the changes in accordance to the requirements specified in sections 3 and 4 of the
present document. In the case there are no changes to modeling data, GOs and TOs
must submit a written confirmation indicating that there are no changes to report and
that current modeling data is valid.
Technical Concerns and Questions Regarding Submitted Modeling Data
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
a) In the case there are technical concerns with regards to the data submitted, the
concerned entity (GO, TO, LSE, RP, etc.) will receive a written notification from the
PC or a TP describing the technical basis or reason for the technical concerns.
b) Each notified entity shall respond to the notifying PC or TP as follows:
• Provide either updated data or an explanation with a technical basis for
maintaining the current data;
• Provide the response within 90 calendar days of receipt of the notification,
unless a longer time period is agreed upon with the PC or TP.
7.2 Data Submission Schedule
All concerned entities responsible for providing modeling data shall submit data annually according
to the following schedule:
Table 7 – Modeling Data Submission Schedule
Modeling Data
Aggregate Demand
Data
Generation Data
Transmission
System Equipment
Data
Complementary
Power System
Information
Description of Deliverables
Steady-state winter peak load forecast
Functional Entity
Responsible
Load Serving Entity
Submission
Date
st
June 1
Steady-state summer peak and light load Load Serving Entity
forecasts
October 1
st
Steady-state demand forecast for
industrial customer facilities
Load Serving Entity
October 1
st
Total system load forecast
Resource Planner
October 1
st
Recertification of steady-state, dynamics Generator Owners
and short-circuit modeling data for
existing generating units
February 1
st
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit
modeling data for new future planned
projects
Generator Owners
February 1
st
Generator facilities outage schedule
Generator Owners
April 1
st
Recertification of steady-state, dynamics Transmission Owners
and short-circuit modeling data for
existing equipment
March 1
st
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit
modeling data for new future planned
projects
Transmission Owners
March 1
st
Transmission system equipment outage
schedule
Reliability Coordinator
April 1
st
Resource Planning Data
Resource Planner
April 1
st
Interchange Data
Transmission Service
Provider
April 1
st
Transmission Planners
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
33
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
7.3 Compliance Violations
For entities registered with NERC, failure to submit required modeling data by the prescribed
submission schedule and in the requested format may be in violation of the requirements
established in NERC’s MOD-032 standard.
For more information regarding compliance violations, functional entities may refer to pages 5-11
of the MOD-032-1 standard document, available on NERC’s website at:
http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Reliability%20Standards/MOD-032-1.pdf
34
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
REFERENCES
[1]
Data for Power System Modeling and Analysis, NERC Reliability Standard MOD-032-1,
2015.
[2]
Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding, NERC Standard PRC-006-1, 2015.
[3]
Demand and Energy Data, NERC Reliability Standard MOD-031-1, 2015.
[4]
Procedures for System Modeling: Data Requirements & Facility Ratings, NPCC Document
C-29, March 2007.
[5]
F. Bélanger, ing, “Mise à jour des réseaux planifiés,” Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie,
Montréal, Québec, September 2015.
[6]
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (July 2012), Démarche à suivre pour un raccordement de
centrale au réseau d’Hydro-Québec [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/
transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/demarche-a-suivre-2012.pdf
[7]
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (February 2009), Transmission Provider Technical
Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission
System [Online]. Available :
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_0
9_en.pdf
[8]
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (February 2011), General Validation Test Program for Wind
Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System [Online]. Available :
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/essais-eoliennes2011-en.pdf.
[9]
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (April 2014), Procedure for PSS/E Model Validation [Online].
Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/procedurevalidation-modeles-psse-en.pdf.
[10]
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (December 2008), Technical Requirements for Customer
Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System [Online]. Available :
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
[11]
Ententes sectorielles HQ Distribution / HQ TransÉnergie [Online]. Available FTP :
transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : commerce/commerce/ File : FBack_ententes_sect.htm
[12]
Siemens Energy Inc. (October 2010), PSSE 32.05 Model Library [Online]. Available FTP :
transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : PTI/PSSE32/DOCS/ModelLibrary File : MODELS.pdf
[13]
Siemens Energy Inc. (October 2010), PSSE 32.05 Program Operation Manual [Online].
Available FTP : transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : PTI/PSSE32/DOCS/POM File : POM.pdf
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
35
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 1 – Load Data Reporting Templates
36
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Total Demand Forecast Template (Winter)
PRÉVISION DE LA CHARGE LOCALE DU TRANSPORTEUR - POINTE D'HIVER (MW)
Version du JJ/MM/AAAA
2014-15
Besoins réguliers du Distributeur1
- Consommation des centrales HQP dans BRD
= Charge locale du Transporteur
Croissance annuelle
en %
dont Alcan
1
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
37 892
74
37 818
375
1.0%
92
La définition des besoins réguliers du Distributeur (BRD) se limite aux besoins des clients desservis par le réseau de TransÉnergie (exclusion des besoins des réseaux autonomes). Les BRD incluent la consommation des
centrales d'HQP associée à l'électricité patrimoniale. Ils sont après effacement de la bi-énergie résidentielle (tarif DT) et avant interruptions chez les clients de la Grande entreprise.
2015-12-16
H:\deluca\2015\Autres\MOD-032\APPENDIX 1 - Load Data Reporting Templates.xlsx
Total Demand
Tarification, prévision et caractérisation
Vice-présidence - Clientèle
Aggregate (per bus/substation) Demand Forecast Template (Winter)
Nom_Poste
Abitibi
Abitibi
Abitibi
Achigan
Achigan
Achigan
Acton
Acton
Acton
Adamsville
Adamsville
Adamsville
Alain-Grandbois
Alain-Grandbois
Alain-Grandbois
Albanel
Albanel
Albanel
Alma
Alma
Alma
Almaville
Almaville
Almaville
Amos
Amos
Amos
Amqui
Amqui
Amqui
Anne-Hébert
Anne-Hébert
Anne-Hébert
Anse Pleureuse 25 kV
Anse Pleureuse 25 kV
Anse Pleureuse 25 kV
Antoine Lemieux
Antoine Lemieux
Antoine Lemieux
Aqueduc 25
Aqueduc 25
Aqueduc 25
Armagh
Armagh
Armagh
Arthabaska
Arthabaska
Arthabaska
Arthur-Buies
Arthur-Buies
Arthur-Buies
Asbestos
Asbestos
Asbestos
Atwater 12
Atwater 12
Atwater 12
Atwater 25
Atwater 25
Atwater 25
Aubertois
Aubertois
Aubertois
Austin
Austin
Austin
Baie D'urfée 12
Baie D'urfée 12
Baie D'urfée 12
Baie D'urfée 25
Baie D'urfée 25
Baie D'urfée 25
Baie Saint-Paul
Baie Saint-Paul
Baie Saint-Paul
Baie Saint-Paul 315
Baie Saint-Paul 315
Baie Saint-Paul 315
Baie-Trinité
Baie-Trinité
Baie-Trinité
Beauceville Est
Beauceville Est
Beauceville Est
Beaulieu
Beaulieu
Beaulieu
Beaumont 12
Beaumont 12
Bus No.
Unité
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
MVA
MW
MVAR
Saison Année V01 Charge V01 Charge V02 Charge V03 Charge V04 Charge V05 Charge P01 Charge P02 Charge P03 Charge P04 Charge P05 Charge P06 Charge P07 Charge P08 Charge P09 Charge P10 Charge P11 Charge P12 Charge P13 Charge P14 Charge P15
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hiver
2009
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 2 – List of Approved Dynamics Models
A2.1 Standard Library Models
Model Name
Model Description
Developer
CBEST
EPRI battery energy storage FACTS model
PTI-Siemens
CDSMS1
American Superconductor DSMES device model
PTI-Siemens
CGEN1
Third order generator model
PTI-Siemens
CIMTR1
Induction generator model with rotor flux transients
PTI-Siemens
CIMTR2
Induction motor model with rotor flux transients
PTI-Siemens
CIMTR3
Induction generator model with rotor flux transients
PTI-Siemens
CIMTR4
Induction motor model with rotor flux transients
PTI-Siemens
CSMEST
EPRI superconducting electromagnetic energy storage FACTS model
PTI-Siemens
CSTATT
Static condenser FACTS model
PTI-Siemens
CSVGN1
SCR controlled static var source model
PTI-Siemens
CSVGN3
SCR controlled static var source model
PTI-Siemens
CSVGN4
SCR controlled static var source model
PTI-Siemens
CSVGN5
WECC controlled static var source model
PTI-Siemens
CSVGN6
WECC controlled static var source model
PTI-Siemens
FRECHG
Salient pole frequency changer model
PTI-Siemens
Generator Models
GENCLS
Classical generator model
PTI-Siemens
GENDCO
Round rotor generator model with dc offset torque component
PTI-Siemens
GENROE
Round rotor generator model
PTI-Siemens
GENROU
Round rotor generator model
PTI-Siemens
GENSAE
Salient pole generator model
PTI-Siemens
GENSAL
Salient pole generator model
PTI-Siemens
GENTRA
Transient level generator model
PTI-Siemens
Compensator Models
COMP
Voltage regulator compensating model
PTI-Siemens
COMPCC
Cross compound compensating model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEVC
1981 IEEE voltage compensating model
PTI-Siemens
REMCMP
Remote bus voltage signal model
PTI-Siemens
Stabilizer Models
BEPSST
Transient excitation boosting stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
IEE2ST
Dual-input signal power system stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEST
1981 IEEE power system stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
IVOST
IVO stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
OSTB2T
Ontario Hydro delta-omega power system stabilizer
PTI-Siemens
OSTB5T
Ontario Hydro delta-omega power system stabilizer
PTI-Siemens
PSS1A
IEEE Std. 421.5-2005 PSS1A Single-Input Stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
PSS2A
1992 IEEE type PSS2A dual-input signal stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
37
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
PSS2B
IEEE 421.5 2005 PSS2B IEEE dual-input stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
PSS3B
IEEE Std. 421.5 2005 PSS3B IEEE dual-input stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
PSS4B
IEEE 421.5(2005) dual-input stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
PTIST1
PTI microprocessor-based stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
PTIST3
PTI microprocessor-based stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
ST2CUT
Dual-input signal power system stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
STAB1
Speed sensitive stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
STAB2A
ASEA power sensitive stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
STAB3
Power sensitive stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
STAB4
Power sensitive stabilizer model
PTI-Siemens
STABNI
Power sensitive stabilizer model type NI (NVE)
PTI-Siemens
STBSVC
WECC supplementary signal for static var system
PTI-Siemens
Excitation System Models
AC7B
38
IEEE 421.5 2005 AC7B excitation system
PTI-Siemens
AC8B
IEEE 421.5 2005 AC8B excitation system
PTI-Siemens
BBSEX1
Brown-Boveri static excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
BUDCZT
Czech proportional/integral excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
CELIN
ELIN brushless excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
DC3A
IEEE 421.5 2005 DC3A excitation system
PTI-Siemens
DC4B
IEEE 421.5 2005 DC4B excitation system
PTI-Siemens
EMAC1T
AEP Rockport excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC1A
1992 IEEE type AC1A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC2A
1992 IEEE type AC2A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC3A
1992 IEEE type AC3A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC4A
1992 IEEE type AC4A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC5A
1992 IEEE type AC5A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC6A
1992 IEEE type AC6A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESAC8B
Basler DECS model
PTI-Siemens
ESDC1A
1992 IEEE type DC1A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESDC2A
1992 IEEE type DC2A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESST1A
1992 IEEE type ST1A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESST2A
1992 IEEE type ST2A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESST3A
1992 IEEE type ST3A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
ESST4B
IEEE type ST4B potential or compounded source-controlled rectifierexciter
PTI-Siemens
ESURRY
Modified IEEE Type AC1A excitation model
PTI-Siemens
EX2000
EX2000 Excitation System
PTI-Siemens
EXAC1
1981 IEEE type AC1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXAC1A
Modified type AC1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXAC2
1981 IEEE type AC2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXAC3
1981 IEEE type AC3 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXAC4
1981 IEEE type AC4 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXBAS
Basler static voltage regulator feeding dc or ac rotating exciter model
PTI-Siemens
EXDC2
1981 IEEE type DC2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXELI
Static PI transformer fed excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
EXNEBB
Bus or solid fed SCR bridge excitation system model type NEBB (NVE)
PTI-Siemens
EXNI
Bus or solid fed SCR bridge excitation system model type NI (NVE)
PTI-Siemens
EXPIC1
Proportional/integral excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXST1
1981 IEEE type ST1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXST2
1981 IEEE type ST2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXST2A
Modified 1981 IEEE type ST2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
EXST3
1981 IEEE type ST3 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEET1
1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEET2
1968 IEEE type 2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEET3
1968 IEEE type 3 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEET4
1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEET5
Modified 1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEX1
1979 IEEE type 1 excitation system model and 1981 IEEE type DC1 model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEX2
1979 IEEE type 2 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEX3
1979 IEEE type 3 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEX4
1979 IEEE type 4 excitation system, 1981 IEEE type DC3 and 1992 IEEE type
DC3A models
PTI-Siemens
IEET1A
Modified 1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEET1B
Modified 1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEET5A
Modified 1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IEEX2A
1979 IEEE type 2A excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
IVOEX
IVO excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
OEX12T
Ontario Hydro IEEE Type ST1 excitation system with continuous and bang bang
terminal voltage limiter
PTI-Siemens
OEX3T
Ontario Hydro IEEE Type ST1 excitation system with semicontinuousand acting
terminal voltage limiter
PTI-Siemens
REXSYS
General purpose rotating excitation system model
PTI-Siemens
MAXEX1
Maximum excitation limiter model
PTI-Siemens
MAXEX2
Maximum excitation limiter model
PTI-Siemens
MNLEX1
Minimum excitation limiter model
PTI-Siemens
MNLEX2
Minimum excitation limiter model
PTI-Siemens
Excitation Limiter Models
MNLEX3
Minimum excitation limiter model
PTI-Siemens
UEL1
IEEE 421.5 2005 UEL1 under-excitation limiter
PTI-Siemens
UEL2
IEEE 421.5 2005 UEL2 minimum excitation limiter
PTI-Siemens
BBGOV1
Brown-Boveri turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
CRCMGV
Cross compound turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
Turbine-Governor Model
DEGOV
Woodward diesel governor model
PTI-Siemens
DEGOV1
Woodward diesel governor model
PTI-Siemens
GAST
Gas turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
GAST2A
Gas turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
GASTWD
Gas turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
GGOV1
GE general purpose turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
HYGOV
Hydro turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
39
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HYGOV2
Hydro turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
HYGOVM
Hydro turbine-governor lumped parameter model
PTI-Siemens
HYGOVT
Hydro turbine-governor traveling wave model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEG1
1981 IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEG2
1981 IEEE type 2 turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
IEEEG3
1981 IEEE type 3 turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
IEESGO
1973 IEEE standard turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
IVOGO
IVO turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
PIDGOV
Hydro turbine and governor model
PTI-Siemens
SHAF25
Torsional-elastic shaft model for 25 masses
PTI-Siemens
TGOV1
Steam turbine-governor model
PTI-Siemens
TGOV2
Steam turbine-governor model with fast valving
PTI-Siemens
TGOV3
Modified IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model with fast valving
PTI-Siemens
TGOV4
Modified IEEE type 1 speed governing model with PLU and EVA
PTI-Siemens
TGOV5
Modified IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model with boiler controls
PTI-Siemens
Two-Terminal DC Line Models
CDC1T
Two-terminal dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CDC4T
Two-terminal dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CDC6T
Two-terminal dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CDC6TA
Two-terminal dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CDC7T
dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CDCABT
ABB dc line model for Kontek line
PTI-Siemens
CEELT
New Eel River dc line and auxiliaries model. This model internally uses the
following models: CHAAUT (auxiliary-signal model), CEEL2T (two-terminal dc
line model), and RUNBK (dc line runback model).
PTI-Siemens
New Eel River dc line model
PTI-Siemens
CEEL2T
Multi-Terminal DC Line Models
MTDC1T
Multiterminal (five converter) dc line model
PTI-Siemens
MTDC2T
Multiterminal (five converter) dc line model
PTI-Siemens
MTDC3T
Multiterminal (eight converter) dc line model
PTI-Siemens
VSCDCT
Two-terminal VSC dc line model
VSC dc Line Model
PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Generator Models
WT1G1
Direct connected (Type 1) generator
PTI-Siemens
WT2G1
Induction generator with controlled external rotor resistor (Type 2)
PTI-Siemens
WT3G1
Doubly-fed induction generator (Type 3)
PTI-Siemens
WT3G2U
Doubly-fed induction generator (Type 3), version 2
PTI-Siemens
WT4G1
Wind generator model with power converter (Type 4)
PTI-Siemens
W4G2U
Wind generator model with power converter (Type 4), version 2
PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Electrical Model
WT2E1
Rotor resistance control model for Type 2 wind generator
PTI-Siemens
WT3E1
Electrical control for Type 3 wind generator
PTI-Siemens
WT4E1
Electrical control models for Type 4 wind generator
PTI-Siemens
W4E2U
Electrical control for Type 4 wind generator, version 2
PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Mechanical Model
40
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
WT12T1
Two mass turbine model for Type 1 and Type 2 wind generators
PTI-Siemens
WT3T1
Mechanical system model for Type 3 wind generator
PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Pitch Control
WT3P1
Pitch control model for Type 3 wind generator
PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Aerodynamic Model
WT12A1
Pseudo-governor model for Type 1 and Type 2 wind generators
PTI-Siemens
Switched Shunt Model
CHSVCT
SVC for switched shunt
PTI-Siemens
CSSCST
SVG for switched shunt
PTI-Siemens
SWSHNT
Switched shunt model
PTI-Siemens
A2.2 Approved User-Defined Models
Model Name
Model Description
Developer
Stabilizer Models
MBPS4S
User-defined PSS model
EXHQSC
User-defined Excitation System model for synchronous condensers
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Excitation System Models
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Excitation Limiter Models
OELHQ
User-defined Excitation Limiter Model (TCE)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Turbine-Governor Model
HQRVW
User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVM
User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVN
User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVC
User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Two-Terminal DC Line Models
CHTFWX
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHTRVX
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHTFWD
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHARVS
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
RSPDC3
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HIGTDC
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model (High Gate)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CMDS
User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Multi-Terminal DC Line Models
NEDCV3
User-defined Multi-Terminal DC Line Model (HQ-NE)
VSCDCT
Two-terminal VSC dc line model
VSC dc Line Model
PTI-Siemens
CABB02
HVDC Light® Open model version Ov1.1.10
ABB
CEmpty
HVDC Light® Open model version Ov1.1.10 (Dummy call)
ABB
Generic Wind Generator Models
EXF2
User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon E82
Enercon
EXS3
User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon E82
Enercon
E822S3
User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon
Enercon
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
41
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
R21201
User-defined Wind Generator Model for Senvion MM92
Senvion
R21301
User-defined Wind Generator Model for Senvion MM82
Senvion
Generic Wind Electrical Model
EFCU02
User-defined Wind Farm Control Unit Model (Enercon)
Enercon
RPMU01
Senvion User-defined Power Management Unit Model
Senvion
Switched Shunt Model
CHASVC
User-defined SVC Model for synchronous condensers
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_AM1
User-defined SVC Model for shunt reactors
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_CMP
User-defined SVC Model (Master)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_EXC
User-defined SVC Model (Slave)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
SVSMO1U1
User written model for continuously controled SVC
PTI-Siemens
SVSMO2U1
User written model for discretely controled SVC
PTI-Siemens
Other Models
42
VFTU1
User-defined Phase Shifting Transformer Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
PVGU1
User written generator model to represent photo-voltaic (PV) systems
PTI-Siemens
PVEU1
User written electrical control model for photo-voltaic (PV) systems
PTI-Siemens
PANELU1
User written model to represent the linearized model of PV panel’soutput
curve
PTI-Siemens
IRRADU1
User written model to represent the linearized model of PV panel’ssolar
irradiance profile.
PTI-Siemens
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 3 – Examples of Siemens-PTI PSS/E
Model Library Data sheets
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
43
PSS®E32.0.5
PSS®E Model Library
Generator Model Data Sheets
GENSAL
1.21 GENSAL
Salient Pole Generator Model (Quadratic Saturation on d-Axis)
This model is located at system
bus
#_____
IBUS,
Machine identifier
#_____
ID,
This model uses CONs starting
with
#_____
and STATEs starting with
#_____
Pm PMECH
EFD
J,
Efd
K.
VOLT at
VT
Terminal
Bus
The machine MVA is _________ for each of units =
_________ MBASE.
#
Speed
ISORCE
Source Current
GENSAL ETERM
ANGLE
ZSORCE for this machine is _________ + j
________ on the above MBASE.
CONs
SPEED
Value
Terminal Voltage
Angle
Description
J
T´do (>0) (sec)
J+1
Tdo (>0) (sec)
J+2
Tqo (>0) (sec)
J+3
H, Inertia
J+4
D, Speed damping
J+5
Xd
J+6
Xq
J+7
X´d
J+8
Xd = Xq
J+9
Xl
J+10
S(1.0)
J+11
S(1.2)
Note: Xd, Xq, X´d, Xd, Xq, Xl, H, and D are in pu, machine MVA base.
Xq must be equal to Xd.
STATEs
#
Description
K
E´q
K+1
kd
K+2
q
K+3
 speed (pu)
K+4
Angle (radians)
IBUS, ’GENSAL’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+11) /
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
1-47
PSS®E 32.0.5
®
PSS E Model Library
Excitation System Model Data Sheets
IEEEX1
6.44 IEEEX1
IEEE Type 1 Excitation System
This model is located at system bus
#_______
IBUS,
Machine identifier
#_______
ID,
ECOMP
This model uses CONs starting with
#_______
J,
VOTHSG
and STATEs starting with
#_______
K,
VUEL
and VAR
#_______
L.
VOEL
CONs
#
Value
EFD
Description
TR (sec)
J
J+1
KA
J+2
TA (sec)
J+3
TB (sec)
J+4
TC (sec)
J+5
VRMAX or zero
J+6
VRMIN
J+7
KE or zero
J+8
TE (>0) (sec)
J+9
KF
J+10
TF1 (>0) (sec)
J+11
Switch
J+12
E1
J+13
SE(E1)
J+14
E2
J+15
SE(E2)
STATEs
K
6-98
IEEEX1
#
Description
Sensed VT
K+1
Lead lag
K+2
Regulator output, VR
K+3
Exciter output, EFD
K+4
Rate feedback integrator
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
PSS®E 32.0.5
PSS®E Model Library
Excitation System Model Data Sheets
IEEEX1
VAR
#
Description
KE
L
IBUS, ’IEEEX1’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+15) /
VREF
VS
+
EC
(pu)
1
1 + sTR
–

+
+
VERR

VRMAX
Regulator
1 + sTC
KA
1 + sTB
1 + sTA
–
VRMIN
VFB
+
VR
1
sTE

EFD
(pu)
–
SE + KE
sKF
1 + sTF1
VS = VOTHSG + VUEL + VOEL
Damping
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
6-99
PSS®E 32.0.5
PSS®E Model Library
Turbine-Governor Model Data Sheets
GAST2A
7.6 GAST2A
Gas Turbine Model
This model is located at system bus
#_______
IBUS,
Machine identifier
#_______
ID,
This model uses CONs starting with
#_______
J,
and STATEs starting with
#_______
K,
and VARs starting with
#_______
L.
CONs
J
#
Value
SPEED
GAST2A
PMECH
Description
W, governor gain (1/droop) (on turbine rating)
J+1
X (sec) governor lead time constant
J+2
Y (sec) (> 0) governor lag time constant
Z, governor mode:
J+3
1 Droop
0 ISO
J+4
ETD (sec)
J+5
TCD (sec)
J+6
TRATE turbine rating (MW)
J+7
T (sec)
J+8
MAX (pu) limit (on turbine rating)
J+9
MIN (pu) limit (on turbine rating)
J+10
ECR (sec)
J+11
K3
J+12
a (> 0) valve positioner
J+13
b (sec) (> 0) valve positioner
J+14
c valve positioner
J+15
f (sec) (> 0)
J+16
Kf
J+17
K5
J+18
K4
J+19
T3 (sec) (> 0)
J+20
T4 (sec) (> 0)
J+21
t (> 0)
J+22
T5 (sec) (> 0)
J+23
af1
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
7-13
PSS®E 32.0.5
®
PSS E Model Library
Turbine-Governor Model Data Sheets
GAST2A
CONs
#
Value
Description
J+24
bf1
J+25
af2
J+26
bf2
J+27
cf2
J+28
TR (degree), Rated temperature1
J+29
K6 (pu), Minimum fuel flow
J+30
TC (degree), Temperature control1
1 Units can be F or C depending on constants a and b .
f1
f1
STATEs
#
Description
K
Speed governor
K+1
Valve positioner
K+2
Fuel system
K+3
Radiation shield
K+4
Thermocouple
K+5
Temperature control
K+6
Gas turbine dynamics
K+7
Combustor
K+8
Combustor
K+9
Turbine/exhaust
K+10
Turbine/exhaust
K+11
Fuel controller delay
K+12
Fuel controller delay
VARs
L
#
Description
Governor reference
L+1
Temperature reference flag
L+2
Low value select output
L+3
Output of temperature control
IBUS, ’GAST2A’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+30) /
7-14
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
PSS®E 32.0.5
PSS®E Model Library
Turbine-Governor Model Data Sheets
GAST2A
MAX
TC
+
Temperature
Control*
T5s + 1
t s

Thermocouple
1
T4s + 1
–
Radiation
Shield
K4 +
Turbine
K5
f1
T3s + 1
Wf1
Reference
VAR(L)
MAX
+
W(Xs+1)

Ys + Z
–
MIN
Speed
Governor
Low
Value
Select
Speed
Control
K6
Fuel
Control
K3
X
e-sT
+
+

Turbine Exhaust
Valve
Positioner
Fuel
System
a
bs + c
fs + 1
1
–
Kf
SPEED
(pu deviation)
PMECH TRATE
MBASE
+
+
1.0

Wf
Fuel Combustor
Flow
e-sECR
Gas Turbine
Dynamics
1
TCDS + 1
Turbine
X
e-sETD
f2
Wf2
N
f1 = TR - af1(1 - wf1) - bf1(SPEED)
f2 = af2 +bf2(wf2) - cf2 (SPEED)
*Temperature control output is set to output of speed governor when temperature control input changes from positive to negative.
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
7-15
PSS®E 32.0.5
®
PSS E Model Library
Generic Wind Generator Model Data Sheets
WT3G2U
17.5 WT3G2U
Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (Type 3)
This model is located at system bus
#_______
IBUS,
Machine identifier
#_______
ID,
This model uses CONs starting with
#_______
J,
and STATEs starting with
#_______
K,
and VAR
#_______
L,
and ICON
#_______
M.
CONs
#
Value
Description
J
Tiqcmd, Converter time constant for IQcmd
J+1
Tipcmd, Converter time constant for IPcmd
J+2
KPLL, PLL gain
J+3
KIPLL, PLL integrator gain
J+4
PLLMAX, PLL max. limit
J+5
Prated
J+6
VLVPL1, LVPL voltage 1 Low voltage power logic
J+7
VLVPL2, LVPL voltage 2
J+8
GLVPL, LVPL gain
J+9
VHVRCR, High Voltage Reactive Current (HVRC) logic, pu voltage
J+10
CURHVRCR, HVRC logic, current (pu)
J+11
RIp_LVPL, Rate of active current change
J+12
T_LVPL, Voltage sensor for LVPL, second
STATEs
Description
K
Converter lag for Ipcmd
K+1
Converter lag for Iqcmd
K+2
PLL first integrator
K+3
PLL second integrator
K+4
Voltage sensor for LVPL
VAR
L
17-8
#
#
Description
deltaQ, overvoltage correction factor
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
PSS®E 32.0.5
PSS®E Model Library
Generic Wind Generator Model Data Sheets
WT3G2U
ICON
M
#
Description
Number of lumped wind turbines
IBUS, ’USRMDL’, ID, ’WT3G2U’, 1, 1, 1, 13, 5,1, ICON(M), CON(J) TO COM(J+12)
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
17-9
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 4 – Generator Modeling Data Reporting
Template
44
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Generator Modeling Data Reporting Template
Generator Characteristics and Steady-state Data
Base Values
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
Machine Type
MES
Sb (MVA)*
Round rotor or salient Initial Commissioning Rated apparent
pole
Date
power
Generator Capacties
Eb (kV)
Rated phase
voltage
Damper
winding
(connection
method)
Coolant
Nominal Values
Sété (MVA)
Shiv (MVA)
Coolant temp. Rated power @ Temp. rise at Rated power @ Design ambient
rated power ⁰C design ambient temperature ⁰C
⁰C
high temp.
temp.
S2h
Pnom (MW)
Nominal Real
Power
En (kV)
Nominal
Voltage
Snom (MVAR)
Nominal
Apparent
Power
PF (%)
Power Factor
H
Inertia Constant
(for each
generating unit)
* Machine reactances (in p.u.) and inertia values must all be based on the base apparent power Sb (MVA) of the machine.
Generator Dynamics Data - Syncrhonous Machines
Unsaturated reactances
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
Saturation coefficients
Saturated reactances
Model Type
Ra @ 25 C
R1
Xl
X2
Xdu
X'du
X''du
Xqu
X'qu
X''qu
Dynamic Model
Standard Library Model
or User-written Model
Armature
resistance per
phase
Stator forward
resistance
Positivesequence
leakage
reactance
Negativesequence
reactance
Unsaturated
direct-axis
synchronous
reactance
Unsaturated
direct-axis
transient
reactance
Unsaturated
direct-axis
subtransient
reactance
Unsaturated
quadrature-axis
synchronous
reactance
Unsaturated
quadrature-axis
transient
reactance
Unsaturated
quadrature-axis
subtransient
reactance
GENSAL
Standard
X'ds
X''ds
Saturated direct- Saturated directaxis subtransient
axis transient
reactance
reactance
X'qs
X''qs
Saturated
quadrature-axis
transient
reactance
Saturated
quadrature-axis
subtransient
reactance
Sgl
Sgu
Saturation factor Saturation factor
at 1 p.u. of
at 1.2 p.u. of
nominal voltage nominal voltage
Time constants
T'do
T''do
T'qo
T''qo
Direct-axis
transient opencircuit time
constant
Direct-axis
subtransient
open-circuit time
constant
Quadrature-axis
transient opencircuit time
constant
Quadrature-axis
subtransient
open-circuit time
constant
KF
T F1
T F2
Generator Dynamics Data - Asyncrhonous Machines
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
Model Type
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
Dynamic Model
Rs
Standard Library Model Stator resistance
or User-written Model
Xs
Rr
Xr
Xm
Xlr
Xo
T'do
s
Stator leakage
reactance
Rotor
resistance
Rotor leakage
reactance
Magnetizing
reactance
Locked rotor
reactance
Open-circuit
reactance
Direct-axis
transient opencircuit time
constant
Generator slip
factor
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
CON7
CON8
CON9
Voltage Regulator Dynamics Data
Model CONS
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
CON1
Dynamic Model
Model Type
Standard Library
Model or User-written
Model
Dynamic Model
VR Type
Model Type
RR
T RH
Regulator
Standard Library
Excitation Type
Exciter
Model or User-written
response ratio Input filter
time
constant
Model
CON6
Model ICONS
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
ICON3
ICON4
Excitation System Dynamics Data
Typical Exciter Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of exciter model)
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
KA
T A1
T A2
VRMAX
VRMIN
KE
TE
Regulator
gain
Regulator time
constant 1 (s)
Regulator time
constant 2 (s)
Maximum
regulator output
Minimum
regulator output
Exciter selfexcitation
Exciter time
constant (s)
SE.75 max
SE max
Rotating exciter Rotating exciter
saturation at 0.75 saturation at max
field voltage
max field voltage
EFD max
EFD min
AEX
BEX
Maximum field
voltage (p.u.)
Minimum field
voltage (p.u.)
Derived
saturation
constant
Derived
saturation
constant
CON3
CON4
CON5
Regulator
Regulator
Regulator
stabilizing circuit stabilizing circuit stabilizing circuit
time constant (s) time constant (s)
gain
(s)
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
IEEET5
Standard
Turbine & Speed Governor Dynamics Data
Other Constants
Typical Governor Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of governor model)
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
Dynamic Model
GOV
Model Type
R
PMAX
T1
Control time
Maximum
Standard Library
Governor Type Turbine steadyconstant
state regulation turbine output
Model or User-written
(governor
(MW)
setting (droop)
Model
delay)
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
HQRVN
T2
T3
T4
T5
F
Hydro reset time
constant or pilot
valve time
Servo time
constant or
dashpot time
constant
Steam valve bowl
time constant
Steam reheat time, hydro water
starting time constant (s) or
minimum gate velocity (MW/s)
Shaft output
(p.u.) or
maximum gate
velocity (MW/s)
CON1
CON2
CON6
CON7
User-Written
Power System Stabilizer Governor Dynamics Data
Typical Stabilizer Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of stabilizer model)
Other Constants
CON8
CON9
CON10
i
Bus No. Installation
No.
Power Plant Name
Unit
No.
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 1
Plant 2
Plant 2
Plant 3
1
2
3
1
2
1
Dynamic Model
Model Type
PSS
KQV
PSS feedback
PSS voltage gain
Standard Library
(p.u.)
Model or User-written (frequency, speed,
accelerating
Model
power)
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
99990
99991
99992
99993
99994
99995
IEEEST
Standard
KQS
TQ
T'Q1
T Q1
PSS speed
gain (p.u.)
PSS reset
time constant
(s)
First lead time
constant (s)
First lag time
constant (s)
T'Q2
T Q2
Second lead time Second lag time
constant (s)
constant (s)
T'Q3
T Q3
VS lim
Third lead time
constant (s)
Third lag time
constant (s)
PSS output limit
setting (p.u.)
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
CON6
CON7
CON8
Wind Farm Modeling Data Reporting Template
Wind Generator Characteristics and Steady-state Data
Single Wind Turbine (WT) Data
i
Bus No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm Name
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
MES
Unit Initial Commissioning
No.
Date
PMAX (MW)
Installed Capacity
EPOI (kV)
PRated (MW)
Rated
power of
one WT
Number of
WTs
WEC
Manufacturer
Model Name
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
Voltage level at
point of
interconnection
QMAX (MVAR)
Max Reactive
Power Export
Collector Network Data
QMIN (MVAR)
Min Reactive
Power Import
En (kV)
Nominal
Voltage
Snom (MVAR)
Nominal
Apparent
Power
XSource (p.u.)
Source
Reactance
ECollector (kV)
RCollector (p.u.) XCollector (p.u.)
Voltage level of
collector network
Equivalent
Equivalent
Resistance of
Reactance of
collector network collector network
CON7
CON8
CON9
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
CON7
CON8
CON9
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
CON7
CON8
CON9
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
CON7
CON8
CON9
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
1
1
Wind Generator Dynamics Data
Model CONS
i
Bus No.
Model Type
Wind Farm Name
Unit
No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
1
1
Dynamic Model
Standard Library Model
or User-written Model
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
Dynamic Model
Model Type
Standard Library
Model or User-written
Model
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
Dynamic Model
Model Type
Standard Library
Model or User-written
Model
Model Type
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
CON6
Model ICONS
ICON3
ICON4
Wind Electrical Model Data
Model CONS
i
Bus No.
Wind Farm Name
Unit
No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
1
1
CON6
Model ICONS
ICON3
ICON4
Wind Mechanical Model Data
Model CONS
i
Bus No.
Wind Farm Name
Unit
No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
1
1
CON6
Model ICONS
ICON3
ICON4
Wind Pitch Control Model Data
Model ICONS
Model CONS
i
U it
CON6
ICON3
ICON4
Bus No.
Wind Farm Name
Unit
No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
1
1
Dynamic Model
Standard Library
Model or User-written
Model
Wind Aerodynamic Model Data
Model CONS
i
Bus No.
Wind Farm Name
Unit
No.
9500
9501
Wind Farm 1
Wind Farm 2
1
1
Dynamic Model
Model Type
Standard Library
Model or User-written
Model
CON1
CON2
CON3
CON4
CON5
CON6
Model ICONS
CON7
CON8
CON9
CON10
ICON1
ICON2
ICON3
ICON4
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 5 – HQT Bus Numbering and
Classification
A5.1 Bus Number Ranges
Bus Number Ranges
Bus Types
Nominal
Voltage
Regional Area
1-299
Generator Buses
All
All
300-699
Substation and Line Buses
315 kV
All
700-799
Substation and Line Buses
735 kV
All
800-999
Reactive Compensator Buses
735 kV
All
1000-1099
Miscellaneous Buses
All
All
1100-1599
Substation and Line Buses
120 kV
All
1600-1699
Substation and Line Buses
161 kV
All
1700-1999
Miscellaneous Buses
All
All
2000-2399
Substation and Line Buses
230 kV
All
2400-2499
Substation and Line Buses
69 kV
All
2500-2799
Load Buses
< 120 kV
La Grande
2800-3149
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Mauricie Nord
3150-3499
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Manicouagan
3500-3829
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Montmorency Nord
3860-4149
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Saguenay
4150-4499
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Laurentides (Outaouais)
4500-5509
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Richelieu
5510-5699
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Mauricie Sud
5700-6349
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Montmorency Sud
6350-6999
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Matapédia
7000-7599
Load Buses
< 120 kV
St-Laurent
7600-8899
Load Buses
< 120 kV
Laurentides (inc. Laval)
8900-8999
Reserved Buses
All
All
9000-9999
Miscellaneous Load Buses
< 120 kV
All
10000-12999
Miscellaneous
All
All
13000-13999
Generator Buses (Wind Farm)
< 6 kV
Montmorency
14000-14999
Generator Buses (Wind Farm)
< 6 kV
Richelieu
15000-15999
Generator Buses (Wind Farm)
< 6 kV
Mauricie
16000-16999
Generator Buses (Wind Farm)
< 6 kV
Matapédia
17000-19999
Miscellaneous Buses
All
All
20000-98999
Transformer tertiary winding bus
< 69 kV
All
99000-99999
Miscellaneous Buses
All
All
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
45
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
A5.2 NPCC Area Codes
Area Number
Area ID
Area Name
101
ISO-NE
ISO New England
102
NYISO
New York ISO
103
IESO
Independant Electric System Operator (Ontario)
104
HQT
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
105
NB
New Brunswick Power
106
NS
Nova Scotia Power
107
CRT
Cedars Rapids Transmission
A5.3 Québec Interconnection Zoning Codes
46
Zone Number
Classification
Voltage Level
Regional Zone
1
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
St-Laurent
2
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Laval
3
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
St-Laurent
4
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Laval
5
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Richelieu
7
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Rive-Nord
8
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
9
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
10
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Mauricie Nord
11
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Montmorency Nord
12
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Rive-Nord
13
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Mauricie Nord
14
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Montmorency Nord
15
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Mauricie Nord
16
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Laval, Rive-Nord
17
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Richelieu
18
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Mauricie Sud
19
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Montmorency Sud
20
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Richelieu
21
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Richelieu
22
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Mauricie Sud
23
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Montmorency Sud
24
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Richelieu
25
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Mauricie Sud
26
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Mauricie Nord
27
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Matapédia
28
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Matapédia
29
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Matapédia
30
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Matapédia
32
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Manicouagan
33
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Manicouagan
34
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Manicouagan
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
36
SCHM Transmission System
N/A
Manicouagan
37
RTA Transmission System
N/A
Saguenay
38
RTA Transmission System
N/A
Saguenay
39
RTA Generating Facilities
N/A
Saguenay
41
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Saguenay
42
RTA Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Saguenay
43
HQT Transmission System
230 kV
Outaouais
44
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Outaouais
45
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Outaouais
46
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Outaouais
47
ÉLL Transmission System
N/A
Outaouais
48
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Abitibi
49
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Abitibi
50
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Abitibi
51
HQT Transmission System
161 to 49 kV
Baie James
53
HQT Transmission System
735 kV
Manicouagan
54
HQT Transmission System
735 kV
Montmorency Nord, Rive-Nord, Saguenay
55
HQT Transmission System
735 kV
Mauricie Sud, Montmorency Sud, Richelieu
56
HQT Transmission System
735 kV
Laval
57
HQT Transmission System
735 kV
Baie James, Rive-Nord, Sageunay
58
HQT Transmission System
315 kV
Baie James
59
HQP Generating Facilities
N/A
Baie James
60
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Abitibi, Baie James
61
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Laval, Rive-Nord
62
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Matapédia
63
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
64
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Manicouagan
65
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
66
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Richelieu
67
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
St-Laurent
68
Privately Owned Generating Facilities
N/A
Saguenau
69
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Manicouagan
70
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Matapédia
71
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Saguenay
72
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Outaouais
73
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Abitibi
74
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Mauricie Sud
75
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Richelieu
76
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Montmorency Nord
77
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Montmorency Sud
78
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
St-Laurent
79
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Rive-Nord
80
High Voltage Client Facilites
N/A
Mauricie Nord
81
Interconnections
N/A
Outaouais
82
Interconnections
N/A
Richelieu
83
RTA Transmission System
N/A
Mauricie Nord
84
RTA Transmission System
N/A
Richelieu
85
RTA Transmission System
N/A
Saguenay
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
47
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
48
86
Interconnections
N/A
Abitibi
87
Interconnections
N/A
Richelieu
88
Interconnections
N/A
Matapédia
90
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Saguenay
91
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Manicouagan
92
Load Zone
< 49 kV
St-Laurent
93
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Richelieu
94
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
95
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Laval, Outaouais, Rive-Nord
96
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
97
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Abitibi, Baie James
98
Load Zone
< 49 kV
Matapédia
99
Reserved for internal usage
N/A
N/A
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
APPENDIX 6 – Interchange Data Template
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
49
LISTE DES CLIENTS 20XX
POUR LE SERVICE DE TRANSPORT
POINT-À-POINT
No.
dossier
Clients
Code
OASIS
Résev.
No
ref
OASIS
Code
PSE
Tag
Nom
original
Mode
prépaiement
Date signat.
Convention
AA/MM/JJ
POR/POD
MW
(sortie)
Convention
LT
Début
Fin
LT
Lcrédit /garantie
CT
Révoquée
Actifs
Dernier achat
achats en 2015
Année
Délégué
responsable
AA/MM/JJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mise à jour: 23 février 2015
1
HQT-DYMO
HQT-LAW
HQT-ON
HQT-P33C
HQT-CORN
HQT-NB
HQT-DEN
HQT-MASS
HQT-DER
HQT-HIGH
HQT-NE
EMI-MAHO
LAW-HQT
ON-HQT
OTTO-HQT
Q4C-HQT
NB-HQT
LAB-HQT
DEN-HQT
MASS-HQT
HIGH-HQT
NE-HQT
MATI-HQT
MAFA-HQT
MAHO-MATI
cacapcité maximale des chemins
HQT-CHNO
Fin
Début
À L'ÉTUDE
RECALL
REDIRECT
MW sortie
POR / POD
client
Référence
OASIS
RÉCEPTIONS
LIVRAISONS
65
85
800
1250
345
160
1029
199
1800
50
225
2000
250
470
1250
85
140
785
5150
100
1000
170
2000
250
99
110
LÉGENDE :
renouvellement
à l'étude
Planification et stratégies du réseau principal
Direction Planification
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Division d’Hydro-Québec
