AMERICAN ORTHOPAEDIC FOOT & ANKLE SOCIETY June 2015 Radiographic Assessment of Lower Extremity Alignment in Ankle Arthritis Using Long-Leg Alignment Views Benjamin R. Williams, MD1 James Holmes, MD1 Paul T. Fortin, MD2 Todd A Irwin, MD1 1 University of Michigan Health System, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery 2 William Beaumont Health System, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery NO CONFLICT TO DISCLOSE Radiographic Assessment of Lower Extremity Alignment in Ankle Arthritis Using Long-Leg Alignment Views Benjamin R. Williams My disclosure is in the Final AOFAS Mobile App. I have no potential conflicts with this presentation. Ankle Arthritis Ankle arthritis has been reported to be as physically and mentally disabling as hip arthritis 70% of ankle arthritis cases are reported to be posttraumatic Lower extremity deformities are common These deformities, whether proximal or distal to the knee and whether post-traumatic or otherwise, have an effect on the biomechanical load at the ankle joint Long-Leg Alignment Long leg alignment views are currently used in knee and hip surgeries to assess multilevel angular deformities In knee arthroplasty, restoring mechanical alignment of the knee is critical for a successful joint replacement Radiographs of the ankle capture deformities at the ankle and distal tibia, but will miss a deformity present in the more proximal aspects of the lower extremity Purpose of Study To use the long-leg alignment view in conjunction with standard ankle radiographs to evaluate the presence of lower extremity deformity in the setting of ankle arthritis The presence of these deformities may have significant impact on surgical decision-making in this cohort of patients Investigate the mean axis deviation (MAD) at the knee through a long-leg alignment view and determine if there is a correlation to the degree of ankle arthritis Determine the prevalence, specific location and characteristics of lower extremity deformity in patients who present with ankle arthritis Outcome Assessment Radiographic Measurements for affected and unaffected sides Mean axis of deviation (MAD) at the knee Anatomic medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA) Anatomic lateral distal tibial angle (aLDTA) Joint line congruence angle (JLCA) at the knee Arthritis Classification Scales Knee Kellgren-Lawrence Ankle Takakura van Dijk COFAS MAD JLCA aMPTA aLDTA Results 53 patients (59 arthritic ankles) without prior ankle surgery Mean age 59 years (range, 28 to 85 years) 24 left and 35 right ankles 15 female patients and 38 male patients Patient’s grouped by Arthritis Grades Van Dijk Grade 0 0 Takakura X COFAS 1 (2%) Kellgren-Lawrence (knee) 2 (4%) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 3a Grade Grade 4 3b 0 X X X 13 46 (22%) (78%) 0 2 (3%) X 4 (7%) 26 (44%) 27 (46%) 9 (15%) 4 (7%) X X 10 35 (17%) (59%) 11 (20%) X X 2 (4%) 17 22 (31%) (41%) Results cont. 47 patients had unilateral ankle arthritis When compared to the contralateral, unaffected ankle: 57.4% of patients had a change in MAD (Δ MAD) ≥10 mm 25.5% of patients had a Δ JLCA ≥ 3° 19.1% of patients had a Δ aMPTA ≥ 5° 48.9% of patients had a Δ aLDTA ≥ 5° A higher aLDTA was a significant predictor for allocation to a grade 3 van Dijk ankle arthritis grade No predictive effect was found between the proximal radiographic parameters and degree of ankle arthritis A Kellgren-Lawrence knee arthritis grade increase from 2 to 3 correlated with an increase in van Dijk ankle arthritis grade from 2 to 3 Case example The clinical utility of the LLA is demonstrated by this patient •The ankle radiograph demonstrated ankle arthritis without visualizing more proximal deformity •The LLA view shows a genu varus deformity which likely contributes to the patients compensatory valgus ankle arthritis. •Angular measurements indicate a varus aMPTA, suggesting a proximal tibia osteotomy may be needed to correct overall alignment. Conclusions In patients with ankle arthritis, there is a high prevalence of lower extremity malalignment using radiographic parameters measured with a LLA view when compared to the unaffected extremity While proximal malalignment was not found to be predictive of degree of ankle arthritis, it is important to recognize the presence of these deformities when surgical planning is performed We recommend obtaining LLA view in all patients with ankle arthritis, in particular those who will undergo a total ankle arthroplasty References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Huch K, Kuettner KE, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis in ankle and knee joints. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997 Feb;26(4):667-674. Saltzman CL, Zimmerman MB, O'Rourke M, Brown TD, Buckwalter JA, Johnston R. Impact of comorbidities on the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 Nov;88(11):2366-2372. Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001 Feb;83-A(2):219-228. Easley ME, Adams SB,Jr, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 Aug 3;93(15):1455-1468. Bibbo C. Controversies in total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2013 Jan;30(1):21-34. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PF. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee 2013 Aug;20(4):242-249. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007 Dec;22(8):1097-1106. Frigg A, Nigg B, Hinz L, Valderrabano V, Russell I. Clinical relevance of hindfoot alignment view in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2010 Oct;31(10):871-879. Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int.1995 Sep;16(9):572-6.