Outline Physics of particle accelerators 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. IDPASC School Basic principles of particle accelerators Several ways of accelerating particles Accelerator zoology Colliders Some more complex topics Conclusions LPNHE, Paris, 8-21 February, 2015 Patrick Puzo Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Université Paris-Sud puzo@lal.in2p3.fr P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 2 References I assume you have prerequisite on classical electrodynamics and special relativity So: Total Energy = γ m c2 107 Protons 105 An introduction to the Physics of Particle Accelerators, World Scientific Publishing, M. Konte & W. Mackay Accelerator Physics, World Scientific Publishing, S. Lee 104 103 2 Momentum = γ m β c ≈ γ m c Particle Accelerator Physics, Springer, H. Wiedemann Electrons 106 102 Kinetic Energy = (γ −1) m c € We will always deal with ultra-relativistic particles Lorentz Facteurfactor de Lorentz Cern Accelerator Schools (specialized) and Cern Summer Student Lectures (introduction) 10 1 1 10 102 103 104 105 106 107 Energie totale (MeV) Total energy (MeV) € Some pictures will be taken from a book on Accelerators I am currently writing with André Tkatchenko (in French) € P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 3 A bit of vocabulary P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 4 Outline Accelerators/colliders Past • CERN (Geneva): Sp pS (p, p ), LEP (e+, e-) • SLAC (Stanford): PEP (e+, e-), SLC (e+, e-), PEP II (e+, e-) • DESY (Hamburg): HERA (e, p) € € • Fermilab (Chicago): Tevatron (p, p) • KEK (Tsukuba): KEK-B (e+, e-) Present € Au) • BNL (New York): RHIC (Au, • GANIL (Caen): SPIRAL (ions) • CERN: LHC (p, p) (Far) future • ILC (e+, e-) 1. Basic principles of particle accelerators P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 5 Several ways of accelerating particles Accelerator zoology Colliders Some more complex topics Conclusions P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 6 1 Lorentz force : action of E field Driving equations in accelerator physics Particle accelerators use electromagnetism and special relativity Maxwell equations ρ ∇.E = ε0 ∂B ∇×E = − ∂t ∇.B= 0 1 ∂E ∇ × B = µ0 J + 2 c ∂t € ∫ F .dt The kinetic energy gain is: ΔEkin = ∫ F € . ds F = q ( E + v × B) Lorentz force Electric force Magnetic force with ds = v dt and F = q ( E + v × B) dEkin ⇒ ΔEkin = q ∫ E . ds ⇒ = q E .v dt ⇒ Ekin = Cste if E = 0 or E ⊥ v € € To produce high energy photons or neutrons, one needs first to accelerate charged particles and create neutral particles via nuclear reaction. For instance: 9 Be(d, n)10B or e+ + e − → q + q + γ Neutral beam cannot be well collimated € School, February 2015 IDPASC P. Puzo € 7 dp d(γ m v ) = = qv×B dt dt Trajectory is curved in B field: Projecting: (ρ: local radius) dv =0 dt γm € P. Puzo No speed € variation v2 p =qvB ⇒ Bρ= ρ q Magnetic rigidity Numerically (for a quantum charge): Particles turn around B field at cyclotron frequency € Classical case ωc = P. Puzo qB m Accelerating a charged particle is always done by an electric € field 8 IDPASC School, February 2015 Relative effects of E and B Lorentz force: action of B field The momentum variation of a charge under the Lorentz force is: Δp = Lorentz: Action of E(t) and B(t) on a charge q (moving at speed v): pGeV/c = 0,3 BT ρ m € qB or ωc = γm If B and v are perpendicular: E Fe E = = Fm v × B β c B If E = 107 V/m, then the B field to have the same force is 3 T if β = 0,01 and 0,03 T if β = 1 € Relativistic case 9 IDPASC School, February 2015 Limits: Emin ≈ 0 and Bmin ≈ BEarth Emax in vacuum: ≈ 100 kV/cm or 107 V/m Bmax ≈ 2 T (classical magnet) or ≈ 10 T (superconducting magnet) At high energy, guiding of high energy particles will only be done by B fields. E fields are only used at low energy P. Puzo 10 IDPASC School, February 2015 € Charged particle optics Optics is guiding of charged particles. To 1st order (as in geometrical optics), it is linear A x : position x’ : angle ⎛1 L ⎞ C = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝0 1 ⎠ ⎛ x ⎞ ⎛ e f ⎞ ⎛a b ⎞ ⎛ x0 ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ xʹ′ ⎠ ⎝ g h ⎠ ⎝ c d ⎠ ⎝ x0ʹ′ ⎠ B ⎛a b ⎞ A = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ c d ⎠ P. Puzo ⎛ e f ⎞ B = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ g h ⎠ ⎛ x ⎞ ⎛ x ⎞ ⇒ ⎜ ⎟ = B A ⎜ 0 ⎟ ⎝ xʹ′ ⎠ ⎝ xʹ′0 ⎠ ⎛ x ⎞ ⎛ x ⎞ ⇒ ⎜ ⎟ = B C A ⎜ 0 ⎟ ⎝ xʹ′ ⎠ ⎝ xʹ′0 ⎠ An accelerator merges drift spaces and elements where B field € € guides charged particles: Usually dipoles, quadrupoles and sextupoles € IDPASC School, February 2015 € B L For two elements: € A € Between elements, we have drift spaces: An element is a region where B ≠ 0. For one element: ⎛ x ⎞ ⎛a b ⎞ ⎛ x0 ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ xʹ′ ⎠ ⎝ c d ⎠ ⎝ xʹ′0 ⎠ 11 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 12 € 2 Fringe field Dipoles Orthogonal B field usually is uniform if pole geometry is under control 1 qB qBc = ≈ ρ p γ m c2 A charged particle is bent on a circular trajectory with radius ρ: A particle with another momentum will be more or less deviated: Particles with Δp will not be kept on magnetic axis p + Δp € p p - Δp For an angle θ and a radius of curvature ρ : Matrix for a dipole P. Puzo In a ring, all particles come back to the same longitudinal position s after one turn (but not necessary at the same transverse position) If all dipoles have the same B field value (or the same radius of curvature ρ), the ring is isomagnetic Be careful of the difference between the dipole radius of curvature ρ and the ring circumference R ⎛1 ρ θ ⎞ A = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝0 1 ⎠ 13 IDPASC School, February 2015 € P. Puzo 14 IDPASC School, February 2015 Yoke Culasse g 8000 µ = f(B) Bobine d’excitation Each coil parcourues par le circulates courant NI/2 μr max 6000 Be = f(μ) 4000 2000 NI/2 μr >> 1 Be μr Vacuumà chamber Chambre vide Classical dipoles are usually in iron to keep magnetic field lines g is the gap 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 B (T) For a C-shape magnet iron Real example: to 1st order Yoke Culasse Several types: C-shape magnets H-shape magnets Window magnets Culasse Chambre à vide From theory to practice Chambre à vide Vacuum chamber IDPASC School, February 2015 LEP dipole Bobine d’excitation parcourues par le courant NI/2 g P. Puzo NI (Ampères-tours) μr >> 1 15 P. Puzo 16 IDPASC School, February 2015 Quadrupoles B field proportional to the axis: the further away from the axis, the higher deviation A set of two orthogonal quadrupoles focusing in each plane is globally focusing: 1 1 1 L = + − f fF f D fF f D ∂B ∂B Bx = k y and By = k x with k = x = y ∂y ∂x € € Geometry of the poles matters a lot for the field homogeneity Each quadrupole is focusing in one plan and defocusing in the other but … P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 17 Matrices are: ⎛ 1 AFoc = ⎜ ⎝−1/ fF 0 ⎞ ⎟ et 1 ⎠ ⎛ 1 ADéfoc = ⎜ ⎝1/ fD 0 ⎞ ⎟ 1 ⎠ Convention: a focusing quadrupole is focusing in horizontal (and defocusing in vertical) and a defocusing quadrupole is defocusing € in horizontal (and focusing in vertical) P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 18 3 Sextupoles Field is non linear: Bx = ∂2 By ∂x 2 x y et By = B field on€horizontal axis: Bx = B field on vertical axis: € Bx = ∂2 By ∂x 2 ∂2 By ∂x 2 ∂2 By ∂x 2 Classical dipole schematics: z (x 2 −y 2 ) Bobine x0 Δy and By = x ⎞ ∂2 By ⎛ x02 ⎜ − x0 Δx ⎟ ∂x 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ y0 Δx and By = − ⎞ ∂2 By ⎛ y02 ⎜ − y0 Δy ⎟ ∂x 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ From theory to practice N S S N Classical sextupole schematics: z A sextupole is equivalent to a dipole combined with a quadrupole. It creates some coupling between horizontal and vertical planes S € N N S S From theory to practice x N P. Puzo 19 IDPASC School, February 2015 Combined function magnets 20 IDPASC School, February 2015 Superconducting magnets z z Z P. Puzo I(θ) Chambre à vide Vacuum chamber N X, x x N d Combine focusing and deviation S S 12,5 kA 21 IDPASC School, February 2015 Quadrupole (Tm) Classical magnet ≈2 ≈ 20 Superconducting magnet ≈8 ≅ 100 Limits: Joule effect or high B threshold for Sc phase Differences: Classical: conductor position does not matter. Quality of the B field is given by the geometry of the polar pieces Superconducting: conductor position gives quality of the field. The yoke purpose is only to channel the B lines outside and has no influence on the field in the center P. Puzo P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 IDPASC School, February 2015 22 Large Hadron Collider (LHC) High field limits: Dipole (T) Sextupôle I(θ) = I0 cos(3θ) Squew quadrupole: combines H and V focusing Superconducting magnets Quadrupôle I(θ) = I0 cos(2θ) No longer used nowadays on purpose, but can be created by misalignment .. To correct for the coupling, one uses sextupoles or squew quadrupoles P. Puzo Dipôle I(θ) = I0 cos(θ) 23 p-p collider (E = 7 TeV) built in the LEP tunnel (2πR = 27 km) Superconducting magnets (dipoles: 8,4 T) 90 tons of liquid helium II Helium phase diagram (no field) p (bar) (S) 30 (L) He II 10 P. Puzo He I C hg (V) 0 0 (L) hs 20 1 2 3 4 5 T (K) « The largest refrigerator in the world » IDPASC School, February 2015 24 4 LHC dipole magnets P. Puzo 25 IDPASC School, February 2015 P. Puzo 26 IDPASC School, February 2015 Source Simplest ion source 1st part of an accelerator is always a source delivering stable particles (electrons, protons, ions) Anode Simplest electron source Simplest proton source H+ Best performances are obtained with more sophisticated sources using: Plasmas Chemistry for surfaces (breakdowns, ..) Vacuum technology Lasers (photocathodes) More realistic example Plasma (obtained by heating) P. Puzo 27 IDPASC School, February 2015 Vacuum chambers NEG coating Proton Lead shield P. Puzo Photons emitted by ultra-relativistic electrons in a cone centered on the trajectory with opening angle θ = 1/γ θ= New technology since LEP: distributed pumping using NEG pumps (Non Evaporable Getter) Al € Energy loss on one turn by ultra-relativistic electrons: (ΔE )[ keV ] = 88,5 LHC vacuum chamber IDPASC School, February 2015 29 1 γ First evidence in 1947 on an electron synchrotron from GE built by Langmuir Cooling LEP vacuum chamber 28 IDPASC School, February 2015 Synchrotron radiation Vacuum is needed to limit interactions with residual gas (elastic or inelastic collisions) and allow perfect running of specific systems (sources, accelerating cavities, ..) -5 to 10-13 mbar (lower than on the Moon) In practice: from 10 Cooling Ion and p beam properties are fixed after the source P. Puzo P. Puzo 4 E [GeV ] ρ [m] IDPASC School, February 2015 Radius of curvature 30 € 5 For e± and protons of the same Momentum on the same orbit, one has: e PRS ⎛ m ⎞4 ⎛ 1 ⎞4 −13 = ⎜⎜ e ⎟⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ ≈ 10 ⎝1836 ⎠ ⎝ m p ⎠ Synchrotron radiation is only visible on electron machines, and barely on proton machines € E (GeV) e± protons p PRS 50 1,1 LEP 2 108 15,6 7000 0,0073 Synchrotron power can be very damaging P. Puzo PSR (MW) LEP 1 LHC 31 IDPASC School, February 2015 Power stored in the beam is enormous Energy (GeV) P(MW) = E(GeV) × I(mA) Total current (mA) Power (GW) 60 60 1000 € HERA p 920 HERA e 27,5 20 0,55 RHIC 250 0,013 0,003 LHC 7000 500 3500 SOLEIL 2,75 400 1,1 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 32 60 1. Basic principles of particle accelerators 2. Several ways of accelerating particles 55 3. 4. 5. 6. 33 IDPASC School, February 2015 Static electric field Accelerator zoology Colliders Some more complex topics Conclusions P. Puzo Bertozzi experiment (1964) ΔL = 8 m Evidence of relativistic effects in the electron gun of a microscope v2/c 2 Classical theory: IDPASC School, February 2015 34 Static electric field Obviously, the synchrotron radiation limitation vanishes (quite completely) for a linear accelerator Safety aspects are crucial P. Puzo Synchrotron radiation is looked forward in some cases Dedicated accelerators to produce synchrotron radiation will be compact Outline Tevatron Synchrotron radiation is a limit if the energy is the key point HEP accelerators will be large Example of the lead shielding of the LEP polarimeter Beam power Practical limitation due to breakdowns (order of MV/m) Can push limit up to 10 MV/m using SF6, but not more How to reach higher energies ? Would it be possible to chain these accelerating cells ? 1.2 1 0.8 Relativistic theory: γ = 1+ Ec m c2 0.6 0.2 0 0 € P. Puzo Description relativiste Relativistic theory Classical theory classique Description Experimental dataerimentales Donn ees exp 0.4 1 2 IDPASC School, February 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ec/mc 2 35 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 36 6 Time varying electric field VRF is the accelerating voltage (time dependant) across the gap A particle crossing the gap will receive: +g /2 ΔE = q ∫ −g /2 E z (z, t) dz Time varying magnetic field Accelerating cavity What€matters only in the field when the particle goes through the cavity (10 cm ≈ 300 ps) Neglecting B variation on one turn, total force F and accelerating force Facc are: ⇒ Facc = Half accelerating cell P. Puzo Acceleration via the induced electric field 37 IDPASC School, February 2015 e r dB 2 dt Sparsely used € P. Puzo 38 IDPASC School, February 2015 Plasma based acceleration 1979: first proposal (Tajima and Dawson) 1983: first acceleration (UCLA and LULI laboratories) 2004: first bunches (RAL and LOA laboratories) An intense laser beam creates a plasma wave: some electrons can experience very high gradients Electric field v Electron density One can reach in principle 10 GV/m (compared to < 50 MV/m in a classical structure) P. Puzo Laser wake field accelerator Plasma created by laser pulse IDPASC School, February 2015 LWFA example: 39 PWFA example (FFTB) 42 GeV electrons in plasma cell Nature 445 741 15-Feb-2007 v moving charge a =3 P. Puzo a = 10 IDPASC School, February 2015 40 Plasma is probably (part of) the future of high energy accelerators Timescale ? Co nv en t ion al ac ce ler at or s Plasma wake field accelerator Particule au repos a = 1.2 Plasma created by ultra-relativistic electron beam v Filed line for fast P. Puzo Next step: 40 J / 40 fs 10 GeV Some electrons double their energy in 84 cm IDPASC School, February 2015 41 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 42 7 More exotic scheme Outline CLIC project: energy transfer from low energy high intensity beam through high energy low intensity beam 1. Basic principles of particle accelerators 2. Several ways of accelerating particles 3. Accelerator zoology 4. Colliders 5. Some more complex topics 6. Conclusions Concept tested since several years. 80 MV/m achieved, but with damages in the transfer structure. Will it be operational one day ? P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 43 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 44 Outline Repetition rate can be much higher on a circular machines than on a linear one (50 kHz versus 100 Hz typically) Consequences for a collider on beam size 1. Basic principles of particle accelerators 2. Several ways of accelerating particles 3. Accelerator zoology 1. Circular accelerators 2. Linear accelerators Is synchrotron radiation a concern ? 4. Colliders 5. Some more complex topics 6. Conclusions P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 45 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 46 Cyclotron Principle due to Ernest Lawrence (1929) Beam is curved by B field in « Ds » produced by classical magnets Alternative E field in the gap Time to travel in one D is independent of the radius One could show that: ω= 1st cyclotron (80 keV) A modern one: the 590 MeV from PSI (Zurich) Cavities qB γm Magnets Used for ions and protons, not for electrons € P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 47 P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 48 8 Synchrotron For years, cyclotrons were the most popular accelerators in the world (simplicity, cost, compactness, ..) Synchrotron € To go higher than the GeV, something else is needed TRIUMPH cyclotron (used for heavy ion research) P. Puzo 1 qB = ρ p Cyclotron 49 IDPASC School, February 2015 On the opposite to the cyclotron, B field is applied on the circumference only Principle: Particles are running on a circular path and gain energy by going through accelerating cavities The higher the energy, the higher the cavity frequency B field has to increased simultaneously to keep the particle on the circular orbit P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 50 Example with an injector Guiding and focusing are done by different elements Dynamical range of a classical mgnet is limited (≈ Bmax/20, Bmax) Examples: • LEP: from 20 tp 110 GeV • LHC: from 0,45 to 7 TeV Synchrotron concept requires the use of an injector Acceleration chain at DESY (920 GeV protons and 27,5 GeV e+/e-) P. Puzo 51 IDPASC School, February 2015 Two types of synchrotrons: Proton synchrotrons • The 1st one discovered the antiproton (Bevatron, Berkeley, 1954) • SppS (CERN) discovered W± and Z0 • LHC discovered Higgs boson Electron synchrotrons • LEP was a Z0 and W± factory. Determined the number of neutrino families and 10s of precise standard model measurements Most of the HEP discoveries since 1955 were done on synchrotrons P. Puzo IDPASC School, February 2015 52 Betatron Principle is to used time varying B field to accelerate particles vie induced E field (formerly only with protons) One has: Fem = e r dB 2 dt F Particle trajectory F € B field € Modern use: X ray production (with electrons) € Radiography P. Puzo Tumor treatment IDPASC School, February 2015 53 9