Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental
Assessment Report
9 December 2013
Final
Issue No 2
47068886
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase II Environmental Assessment Report
Project Title:
Manor Royal, Crawley
Report Title:
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
Project No:
47068886
Report Ref:
Status:
Final
Client Contact Name:
Mr. Greville English
Client Company Name:
Harwoods
Issued By:
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd.
St Georges House
5 St Georges Road
Wimbledon
London SW19 4DR
United Kingdom
Tel: + 44 (0) 20 8944 3300
Fax: + 44 (0) 20 8944 3301
www.urscorp.eu
Document Production / Approval Record
Issue No:
Name
Prepared
by
Approved
by
Signature
Date
Position
Paolo Donati
09 December
2013
Geoenvironmental
Consultant
Stefano Alba
09 December
2013
Technical Director
Document Revision Record
Issue No
Date
Details of Revisions
1
29 November 2013
Draft
2
9 December 2013
Final
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase II Environmental Assessment Report
LIMITATION
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd. (URS) have prepared this Report for the sole use of
Harwoods in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other
warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any
other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior
and express written agreement of URS. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments
made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without
significant change. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon
information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been
provided by those parties from whom it has been requested. Information obtained from third parties
has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail
required to achieve the stated objectives of the services. The results of any measurements taken may
vary spatially or with time and further confirmatory measurements should be made after any significant
delay in using this Report.
COPYRIGHT
© This Report is the copyright of URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised
reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
CONTENTS
Section
Page No
1.
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 2
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2
Site Location and Description ....................................................................................... 2
Scope of Works............................................................................................................ 3
2.
REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL (CSM)........................................................... 3
2.1.
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
2.5.
2.6.
2.7.
Geology ....................................................................................................................... 3
Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................... 4
Surface water and flood risk ......................................................................................... 4
Site History & Potential for Significant Contamination ................................................... 4
Waste .......................................................................................................................... 5
Industrial Land Use ...................................................................................................... 5
Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) .................................................................... 6
3.
SITE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................ 9
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
Health, Safety and Environment Plan (HSEP) .............................................................. 9
Underground Service Clearance................................................................................... 9
Intrusive Site Works ..................................................................................................... 9
Laboratory Analysis...................................................................................................... 9
Geology ..................................................................................................................... 11
4.
GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 12
4.1.
4.2.
4.3.
4.4.
Generic Risk Screening Approach .............................................................................. 12
Environmental Analytical Results and Generic screening ............................................ 13
Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC).............................................................. 14
ACEC Classification ................................................................................................... 15
5.
UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL .................................................................. 16
6.
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 17
6.1.
6.2.
6.3.
Human Health ............................................................................................................ 17
Controlled Waters ...................................................................................................... 17
Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 17
FIGURES
APPENDIX A - BOREHOLE LOGS
APPENDIX B - CONTAMINATION TABLES AND LABORATORY CERTIFICATES
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
i
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
1.
INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared by URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd (URS) on
behalf of Harwoods, and presents the findings, conclusions and recommendations from
the Phase 2 Environmental Investigation carried out at the BOC Ltd site located in Manor
Royal, Crawley, herein referred to as “the site”. At the time of the investigation the site
was demolished. The site is centred on National Grid Reference 527500, 138470, and
located within an industrial district in Crawley, West Sussex (see Figure 1).
URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd (URS) is pleased to present (the Client) this
proposal to undertake a Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the BOC Ltd,
Manor Royal,
The work was performed in accordance with URS proposal dated 07 November 2013
(proposal ref: 071113SA). The objectives and scope of this assessment are presented in
the following sections.
1.1.
Objectives
The objectives of this assessment is to complete an intrusive investigation at the site in
order to supplement and provide contamination data relating to the ground conditions
underlying the site, and to inform the significance of potential environmental liabilities as
part of the proposed acquisition. The works aim to refine the Conceptual Site Model
(source-pathway-receptor of contamination) using information previously acquired during
the URS July 2009 investigation.
1.2.
Site Location and Description
The site is located at the corner of Manor Royal and Faraday Road, Crawley, West
Sussex (see Figure 2). The site covers an area of approximately 3.8 hectares and is
located within an industrial area comprising several engineering and manufacturing
works, plus various appliances including tanks and electric sub-stations.
The site is currently being partially used as a long term car park (approximately 60% of
site space) the remaining portion is a demolished building footprint associated with the
previous BOC facility; covered by hardstanding comprising tarmac or concrete slabs.
Isolated areas of grass are present in the north, west and south of the site.
Existing buildings and infrastructure include, from north to south: a car park and a
temporary storage and welfare facility for on-site workers. It is understood that the site
was demolished in 2011 and that all operations associated with BOC Ltd have ceased.
The site topography is generally flat; evidence of swelling and shrinking of ground surface
(possibly associated with the underlying Weald Clay) is present in the car park in the
north of the site.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
2
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
1.3.
Scope of Works
The following work was carried out as part of the Phase 2 Environmental investigation:
2.

Prior to commencement, a project specific Health & Safety Plan was produced
which included a method statement for the works and a hazard risk assessment;

Prior to intrusive works, an underground survey was undertaken by specialist
sub-contractor ADP Group Ltd at each exploratory location to detect the
presence of underground services. A plan indicating proposed drilling and
excavation locations was emailed to Greville English for review and agreement
prior to works;

Concrete coring and hardstanding breakout was carried out at borehole locations
BH9, BH10 and BH11 located on hardstanding;

Drilling of 5 no. boreholes (BH7 to BH11) using window sampling techniques to a
maximum depth of 3.8m bgl; each borehole location was hand dug to a depth of
1.2 m bgl as a secondary precaution against any unidentified subsurface utilities;

Soil arisings were screened using a Photoionisation Detector (PID) and
representative soil samples collected as appropriate for laboratory analyses; and

Soil samples were sealed and stored under appropriate conditions and sent by
courier to a United Kingdom Accredited (UKAS) laboratory for environmental
analysis.
REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL (CSM)
The following subsections summarise the general environmental setting of the site and its
surroundings utilising observations made during the site walkover and desktop
assessment included in the URS 2009 report.
Under UK best practice a preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM) lays the foundation to
subsequent assessments. As additional site-specific data is obtained, equally the CSM is
revised in order to interpret findings appropriately.
The URS 2009 investigation comprised 6 No. window sampling boreholes (BH1 to BH6)
to a maximum depth of 2.9m bgl. The 2009 report identified no groundwater beneath the
site therefore it is considered that controlled waters continue to no longer be a sensitive
receptor at this site.
2.1.
Geology
A review of the British Geological Survey (BGS) Map of Horsham (BGS Sheet 302, Solid
and Drift Edition, 1: 50 000 series) indicates that the site is underlain by Made Ground
and below by Weald Clay, which is categorised as a non-aquifer.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
3
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
2.2.
Hydrogeology
The National Rivers Authority Groundwater Vulnerability Map for East Kent (Sheet 46,
East Sussex 1:100,000 Series) indicates that a negligibly permeable unproductive strata
underlies the site, namely the Weald Clay. These formations are generally regarded as
containing insignificant quantities of groundwater.
There were no groundwater source protection zones designated by the Environment
Agency in the immediate area surrounding the site. The 2009 Envirocheck report
indicates that there were no licensed surface water or groundwater abstractions within
1km of the site.
2.3.
Surface water and flood risk
According to the 2009 Envirocheck report the nearest surface water feature was an
unidentified water body located approximately 240m south of the site. According to the
available OS map this feature appeared to be a drain to the south of Magpie Wood. No
classified rivers are present within 1km of the site.
There were twelve discharge consents located within 1km of the site. The closest was at
approximately 260m northeast of the site and associated with British Telecommunications
Plc for the discharge of surface water into the Crawters Brook stream. The remaining
consents related to the discharge of cooling water or surface water for industrial activities
into streams.
According to the 2009 Envirocheck report, there were six recorded pollution incidents
located within 500m of the site. The closest (Category 3 – Minor Incident) occurred in
1992 within the subject site and involved the discharge of unknown sewage to an
unidentified receptor, presumably a drain. Two Category 2 - Significant Incidents
involved the release of unknown oils and chemicals at approximately 360m northeast of
the site (unidentified receptors). The site is not located within an area at risk from
flooding. The site is located within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone with respect to surface
water.
2.4.
Site History & Potential for Significant Contamination
Ordnance Survey Maps of the following scales 1:1,250, 1:2,500, 1:10,000 and 1:10,560
dated between 1869 and 2008 were reviewed.
2.4.1. On Site History
According to anecdotal information within the 2009 URS report, the site was a greenfield
site up to 1957. This is consistent with the available historical maps, which show the
existing main building already present in 1959. The same 1959 map showed a pond
located in the southeast of the site, and unidentified tanks to the north of the main
building; these tanks were not reported present at the time of the 2009 site visit and,
according to the former BOC’s site manager, contained argon and liquid nitrogen and
were removed few years before the site visit.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
4
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
The 1971 map shows the storage buildings (recently demolished) in the middle and
northwest of the site, and additional tanks to the north of the main building which,
according to the site manager, were used for water storage.
The later maps do not show significant changes in land use.
2.4.2. Off Site History
The surrounding site area was occupied by greenfields until the late 1950s. A variety of
engineering and manufacturing works are shown on the 1959 and later maps.
Greenfields were located to the north of the site and to the south of the site (the latter
named Magpie Wood).
Since 1970 additional factories were built to the north of the site.
2.5.
Waste
According to the 2009 Envirocheck report, there were no licensed waste management
facilities or recorded waste transfer sites within 500m of the site.
There were two recorded waste transfer sites within 500m of the site. The closest was
approximately 260m northeast and authorised to handle pharmaceutical waste.
One registered waste treatment or disposal site was located approximately 230m north of
the site (license now elapsed / revoked), for incineration of pharmaceutical waste.
No historical landfills or local authority recorded landfills were recorded within 2km of the
site.
2.6.
Industrial Land Use
2.6.1. Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
According to the 2009 Envirocheck report, there was one contemporary trade directory
entry located on-site, associated with the former BOC site (Edwards, pump
manufacturers).
There were more than 130 contemporary trade directory entries located within 500m of
the site including: packaging manufacturers, garage services, television and video
manufacturers, car body repairs, painting works, metal finishing, printers and several
engineering works.
2.6.2. Fuel Station Entries
There was one fuel station entry within 500m from the site, located at approximately
460m west of the site (petrol station).
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
5
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
2.6.3. Hazardous Substances
There were no entries associated with handling or storage of hazardous substances
within 500m of the site.
2.7.
Preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM)
2.7.1. Potential On Site Sources of Contamination
The available historical maps and the 2009 URS report highlighted the following potential
sources of contamination:

Former paintshop and cleaning tank in the southeast of the main building
(chlorinated solvents and Trichloroethylene (TCE));

Former old paintshop, cleaning tank and plating works in the west of the main
building (metals, chlorinated solvents and TCE);

Laboratory workshop in the west of the site associated with the use of mercury
for the production of manometers (mercury);

Existing compressor in the north of the main building, with evidence of oil leakage
noted on site (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH));

Hazardous waste storage area for hydrocarbon contaminated material to the east
of the main building (TPH);

Water treatment plant to the east of the main building (acidic substances used for
treatment of heavy metals in water) (metals, acids); and

Former electric sub-station in the southwest of the site (Poly Chlorinated
Biphenyls (PCB)).
In addition, the current use of the site is an airport related car park (TPH).
2.7.2. Potential Off Site Sources of Contamination
Surrounding industrial land use, including: packaging manufacturers, garage services,
television and video manufacturers, car body repairs, painting works, metal finishing,
printers, several engineering works, waste transfer and treatment sites.
2.7.3. Receptors
Based on the desk study review and current statutory guidance, the following potential
receptors have been identified:

Human Health: comprising future site employees and workers;

Controlled Waters: including the unidentified surface water feature at 240m south
of the site, and other unclassified streams surrounding the site); and
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
6
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report

Property: proposed building foundations, underground structures and services (e.g.
water supply pipes).
2.7.4. Pathways
The pathways considered viable for the migration of potential contaminants are as
follows:
2.7.4.1. Human Health
Based on future continued industrial land use for the site, the following exposure
pathways are considered viable:

Ingestion of superficial soils;

Indoor and outdoor ingestion of soil derived dust;

Dermal contact with superficial soils and soil derived dust;

Indoor and outdoor inhalation of soil derived dust; and

Indoor and outdoor inhalation of vapours from volatile soil and groundwater
contamination.
It is noted that the pathways listed above are those typically considered for chronic
human health risk assessments and do not include pathways associated with short-term
remediation or maintenance activities where workers may come into contact with soils
2.7.4.2. Controlled Waters
Based on the known site environmental setting and UK statutory and technical guidance,
the following migration pathways that have the potential to cause pollution of sensitive
Controlled Waters receptors viable:

Leaching of chemicals from impacted soils into soil pore-water by infiltrating
precipitation; and

Lateral migration of constituents of concern in perched groundwater to surface
waters of unclassified streams in the surrounding area.
No vertical migration pathways due to the absence of potential groundwater receptors
(the site is located on a Non-Aquifer (Weald Clay)).
2.7.4.3. Property
Migration and exposure pathways that might impact below ground foundations, structures
and services include:

Permeation of plastic pipes by certain organic compounds; and
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
7
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report

Dissolution of sulphate and magnesium into perched water, creating conditions
aggressive to underground concrete.
Table 2.1 below presents a summary of the preliminary CSM discussed in the Sections
above.
Table 2.1 Preliminary Pollutant Linkage
SOURCE
Former paint shops, cleaning
tanks and plating works inside
main building (metals, chlorinated
solvents and Trichloroethylene TCE)
Laboratory workshop in the west
of the site associated with the
use of mercury for the production
of manometers (mercury)
Compressor in the north of the
main building, with evidence of oil
leakage (Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons - TPH)
Hazardous waste storage area
for hydrocarbon contaminated
material to the east of the main
building (TPH)
Water treatment plant to the east
of the main building (acidic
substances used for treatment of
heavy metals in water) (metals,
acids)
A former pond in the southeast of
the site, which was infilled with
unknown material and planted as
a garden (unknown substances)
PATHWAY
RECEPTOR
Human Health
Ingestion of superficial soils;
Future Site Workers & Visitors
Indoor and outdoor ingestion of soil
derived dust;
Dermal contact with superficial soils
and soil derived dust;
Indoor and outdoor inhalation of soil
derived dust; and
Indoor and outdoor inhalation of
gases / vapours from volatile soil and
groundwater contamination.
Controlled Waters
Leaching of chemicals from impacted
soils into soil pore-water by infiltrating
precipitation
Surrounding unclassified streams
(closest is 240m south of the site)
Lateral migration of contaminants of
concern in perched water to surface
waters of unclassified streams in the
surrounding area.
Property
Permeation of pipes
Building foundations
Dissolution into perched water
Underground structures
Ingress of gases through foundations
Underground services
Buildings
An electric sub-station in the
southwest of the site (Poly
Chlorinated Byphenyls – PCB)
Current use: car park (TPH)
N.B. – not all contaminant sources apply to all pathways. This table is intended as a summary only.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
8
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
3.
SITE INVESTIGATION
An intrusive site investigation was undertaken at the site by URS on 14 to 15 November
2013. The following sections detail the work carried out and the findings of the
investigation.
3.1.
Health, Safety and Environment Plan (HSEP)
A URS‘ Health Safety and Environmental Plan was completed prior to any site
reconnaissance or preliminary works being undertaken at the Site. The HSEP described
the health, safety and environmental requirements for URS project personnel and their
contractors' personnel involved in the environmental site investigation works. The HSEP
included key project responsibilities, standard safe working practises, general physical
and chemical hazards, a detailed hazard risk assessment, requirements for personal
protective equipment (PPE), environmental management, decontamination procedures,
waste management, management of change and emergency response plans.
3.2.
Underground Service Clearance
The presence of underground services such as electrical cables and drainage and
effluent pipes in the vicinity of each proposed location was assessed by specialist
subcontractor ADP Group Ltd.
3.3.
Intrusive Site Works
The approximate location of each intrusive location is shown in Figure 2.
sampling logs are presented in Appendix A.
Window
Five soil bore locations (BH7 – BH11) were completed by ADP Group Ltd using a tracked
continuous percussive drilling method to a maximum depth of 3.8m bgl, with soil arisings
recovered within plastic liners.
Soil borings were backfilled with on-site soils and the surface reinstated to the original
condition.
3.3.1. Soil Sampling
Based on field observations of potential contamination, two soil samples were generally
collected from each of the soil bores and sent to the accredited laboratory.
Soil from selected locations was also monitored for volatile organic compounds using a
handheld PID. All arisings were logged in general accordance with BS EN ISO 14688 12002 and BS 5930.
3.4.
Laboratory Analysis
Soil samples collected during the subject investigation in November 2013 were submitted
for analysis to Chemtest, an approved subcontract laboratory that meets the
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
9
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
requirements of URS’ Laboratory Quality Management System. Chemtest is UKAS
accredited and holds MCERTS accreditation for a number of its analytical methodologies.
Soil samples collected during the 2009 investigation were analysed by Alcontrol
Laboratories, also UKAS accredited.
Environmental laboratory certificates are presented as Appendix B.
3.4.1. Environmental Analytical Schedule
The analytical schedules for soil samples collected for the subject investigation was
carried out as following:

A suite of selected metals (arsenic, chromium, chromium VI, copper, lead,
mercury, selenium, nickel and zinc);

Poly-cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH);

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH);

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC);

pH;

Asbestos Presence Screen;

Total Organic Carbon (TOC).

Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) testing (2 samples only)
Typically two samples were analysed from each borehole location, one from Made
Ground within the first 0.5m, where present, and the second from underlying natural soil
(Weald Clay).
The analytical schedules for soil samples collected in 2009 were very similar, with
selected samples being also tested for Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC),
sulphate and Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB).
The analytical schedule for samples collected in both investigations is shown in the
appended Table 1.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
10
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
3.5.
Geology
Two main soil units were encountered in the intrusive investigation. The general geology
encountered is summarised in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Geological Summary
Thickness Range
(m)
Stratum
Description
Made Ground
Made Ground generally comprised
concrete and tarmac hardstanding above
clayey sandy GRAVEL of tarmac brick
and concrete.
0.3 to 0.74
Predominantly soft to firm brown to
orange / red mottled grey CLAY / SILT
1.82 to 3.40
(Topsoil encountered
two locations instead)
Weald Clay
at
Depth not proven
3.5.1. Made Ground
Made Ground was encountered in all five locations up to a maximum depth of 0.74m.
Made Ground generally comprised concrete and tarmac hardstanding above sandy
gravel or gravelly sand, locally clayey, of brick and concrete. Fragments of tarmac were
encountered at borehole BH7. Grass overlying topsoil and reworked clay mixed with
concrete and brick fragments were encountered in BH8, the only borehole positioned on
soft ground.
3.5.2. Weald Clay
This unit is generally characterised by soft to stiff brown to orange / red mottled grey
CLAY / SILT, grading to weak siltstone at depth.
3.5.3. Groundwater
No groundwater or perched water was encountered at any of the boreholes.
3.5.4. Observations of Impact
During site works visual and olfactory observations of contamination were recorded on
the borehole and trial pit logs. PID measurements of ionisable hydrocarbons were taken
at regular depth intervals. The maximum recorded concentrations were of 0.3ppm in two
samples from BH7 and BH11 at 0.5m bgl. Both collected from the top of the Weald Clay.
PID measurements recorded during the field works are presented on the borehole logs
included as Appendix A.
Visual and olfactory observations of contamination were not encountered, with the
exception of Made Ground recovered from boreholes BH7 (slight hydrocarbon odour from
tarmac) and BH11 (staining).
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
11
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
4.
GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENT
This section presents the methodology of the Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment
(GQRA). A risk-based approach has been adopted for the assessment of data from the
site. The data have been screened against criteria considered appropriate given the
continued commercial / industrial use of the site and within the context of the site
environmental setting, in order to assess the significance of identified impacts (if present).
Constituent concentrations in soil at the site were deemed ‘potentially significant’ where
they exceeded the ‘generic’ values. These values are used for initial screening of
contaminant concentrations for the purpose of providing an initial indication of impacts at
a site and evaluating the compounds that could proceed to a detailed assessment. As
such, it should be noted that generic exceedances are not an indication of the
requirement for remediation but rather, an indication of the need for further assessment.
Additionally, where further risk assessment is considered necessary, use of more site
specific information in the assessment can often lead to the conclusion that the observed
concentrations are present at levels which represent an acceptable level of risk,
considering the actual or proposed end use of a site (although each site assessment
does have to be considered on an individual basis).
4.1.
Generic Risk Screening Approach
For the purposes of this report, comparing the concentrations recorded in soil against
appropriate guideline values has been carried out to provide a preliminary assessment of
the potential risks arising from identified impacts.
Given the environmental setting of the site, the following receptors have been identified
for potential on-site and off-site contamination:

Future workers / users of the site (adult human health receptor); and

Unidentified water stream located approximately 240 m south of the site (surface
water receptor).
The generic guideline values used are described below and are based on the UK
guidance commercial / industrial use scenario.
The assessments of risks described herein focus on the long-term and chronic exposure
to human health and the environment exposure. Short term acute exposure during
construction works are considered to be outside the scope of this report and should be
addressed using site and method specific assessment and mitigation measures in
accordance with prevailing legislation and guidance. Generic Guideline Values for Human
Health – URS Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC)
Soil data have been compared against generic screening criteria derived by URS. URS
GAC are risk-based soil and groundwater concentrations that are protective of chronic
risks to human health for a broad range of site conditions and different generic land-uses.
They represent the first stage of assessment (also commonly called “screening values”).
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
12
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
If applied correctly to a site with a broadly consistent conceptual exposure model, it is
recommended that an exceedance of a URS GAC triggers a need for further assessment
of some form, such as a re-evaluation of the applicability of the conceptual site model
relative to the GAC, further site investigation, more detailed quantitative risk assessment
(also known as Stage 3 DQRA), and potentially remedial action, subject to tests of costbenefit, practicability and reasonableness.
For the purpose of this assessment, both data from the 2009 and 2013
investigations were compared to the most recently derived GAC.
4.1.1. Generic Guideline Values for Controlled Waters
Following development of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for the site as described in
Chapter 2, namely that the site is underlain by an unproductive strata and an unidentified
surface water receptor 240m south of the site, soil data has been compared against
generic criteria for controlled waters taken from Freshwater Environmental Quality
Standards (EQS’s).
To evaluate potential risks to controlled waters from identified soil concentrations, Stage
2 GAC were calculated based on concentrations that would partition at equilibrium to give
EQS concentrations in soil pore water. This soil screening is required to identify
potentially significant areas of soil impact that might not yet have had sufficient time to
impact groundwater. It is noted that this methodology is highly conservative but is
consistent with the Environment Agency approach.
For the purpose of this assessment, both data from the 2009 and 2013 investigations
were compared to the most recently derived GAC.
4.2.
Environmental Analytical Results and Generic screening
The laboratory analytical results have been screened against generic assessment criteria
(GACs) as described above. The following section describes the distribution of identified
impacts across the site, including its significance in terms of the adopted screening
criteria.
Table 1 provides an analytical schedule for both the 2009 and 2013 analyses.
Tables 2 to 6 provide soil analytical data and observed exceedances of generic screening
criteria for both the 2009 and 2013 analyses, which are discussed below.
Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B.
4.2.1. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) and BTEX Compounds
No samples exceeded the human health GAC for TPH and BTEX.
TPH concentrations exceeded controlled waters GAC for one or more aromatic fractions
in samples BH4 (0.4m), BH8 (0.2m) and BH9 (0.5m).
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
13
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
4.2.2. Metals
No samples exceeded the adopted human health GAC for metals. However, chromium
concentrations were compared with relevant GAC for chromium III. If they were to be
compared with chromium VI GAC, seven out fifteen samples would exceed this GAC.
However, Chromium VI is known as an unstable form of chromium and is likely to be
present in elevated concentrations only if coming from specific anthropogenic sources.
For this reason, the use of chromium VI GAC is considered to be too conservative for the
purpose of this assessment.
All the analysed samples exceeded the adopted controlled waters GAC for copper, nickel
and zinc. Two samples exceeded the controlled waters GAC for mercury.
4.2.3. Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) and Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAH)
No samples exceeded the human health GAC for SVOC. Among PAH, only one sample
exceeded the human health GAC (benzo(a)pyrene in sample from BH8, 0.2m).
Samples collected from BH4 (0.40m) and BH8 (0.2m) recorded concentrations exceeding
the relevant controlled water GACs for the majority of PAH compounds.
4.2.4. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
No samples exceeded the human health and controlled waters GACs for VOC.
4.2.5. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
All samples were tested for ACM screen and did not show the presence of asbestos
fibres.
4.2.6. Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Tests
WAC testing was carried out on two samples from BH11 (1.5m) and BH9 (0.5m). Results
of analysis showed that detected concentrations to be generally below the limits for Inert
Waste Landfills. An exceptions were two determinands from BH9 (0.5m), namely
sulphate and Total Dissolved Solids. These two parameters were detected in
concentrations above the respective limits for Inert Waste Landfills, but below the limits
for ‘Stable Non-reactive Hazardous Waste in Non-Hazardous Landfills’.
4.3.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC)
Comprehensive Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures were
implemented at all stages of the work to assess the accuracy of the data set collected
and enable provision of data that is considered acceptable. In addition to adherence to
URS’ sampling protocols, internal QA/QC checks by the laboratory are completed. Soil
samples were subject to sampling, sample custody and laboratory protocols to check
traceability and reliability of analytical results. These included:
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
14
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
4.4.

Record of all works and sampling in site field notes;

Transport of samples with chain of custody documents; and

Confirming receipt of all samples and correct analytical instructions against
laboratory supplied test schedules.
ACEC Classification
Soil analysis was undertaken to assess the Aggressive Chemical Environment for
Concrete (ACEC) site classification. Six samples collected in 2009 were analysed for
water soluble sulphate, with results presented in Table 2.
Based on BRE Special Digest 1 procedures, according to the 2009 report the site was
assessed to have the following classifications for design of below grade concrete
elements:

Design Sulphate Class = DS-1

ACEC Class = AC-1s
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
15
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
5.
UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
Based on the desk study information and findings of intrusive investigation, the
preliminary CSM has been updated to cover the following aspects:
Potential Sources: one isolated concentration of benzo(a)pyrene (PAH) was recorded in
excess of the relevant human health criteria. Various exceedences of controlled water
GAC.
Potential Pathways: ingestion, direct contact and inhalation (see Table 5.1). No
significant pathways related to controlled water receptors are deemed to be present
because of the absence of groundwater and perched water at the site.
Potential Receptors: Future site workers, surface water receptor 240m south of site.
Property receptors such as substructures and underground services were not included,
assuming that a suitable concrete mix will be adopted (see section 4.4) and that new
services will be laid in trenches with clean backfill.
Table 5.1 presents a summary of the CSM showing viable pollutant linkages for the site
following the Generic Risk Assessment.
Table 5.1 – Updated Conceptual Site Model
Medium/
Source
Surface water – 240m S
(unidentified water body)
 Pathway Present
9) Horizontal groundwater
migration
8) Vertical groundwater
migration
7) Leaching from
unsaturated zone

6) Inhalation of vapours

5) Ingestion of groundwater
4) Inhalation of fugitive dust

3) Dermal contact
Soils
Future site workers
(female adult aged 16-59 years) Groundwater
2) Consumption of
vegetables
Pathway
1) Direct soil and dust
ingestion
Receptor

Soils
Groundwater
Blank: Pathway absent or not applicable
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
16
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
6.
SUMMARY
6.1.
Human Health
No samples exceeded the adopted human health GAC for metals.
No samples exceeded the human health GAC for TPH and BTEX.
No samples exceeded the human health GAC for SVOC.
Among PAH, only one sample exceeded a human health GAC (benzo(a)pyrene in BH08
at 0.2m).
6.2.
Controlled Waters
Several metals were identified at concentrations exceeding the controlled waters GAC in
all samples collected across the site.
TPH concentrations exceeded controlled waters GAC for one or more aromatic fractions
in samples BH4 (0.4m), BH8 (0.2m) and BH9 (0.5m).
PCBs exceeded the controlled waters GAC at one location (BH4, 0.4m).
Due to the absence of significant pathways for contamination (no groundwater or perched
water was encountered on site, which is underlain by an unproductive strata) and highly
sensitive water receptors, the overall risk to controlled waters posed by the subject site is
deemed to be low.
6.3.
Conclusions
Based on these results and the continued commercial / industrial use of the site, the risk
to future human health receptors is considered to be low.
During proposed development works ground contamination may be locally encountered,
at locations not covered by the URS investigation. However, any encountered
contamination is likely to be local and to not pose significant risks to relevant human
health and controlled water receptors.
It is recommended that an ACEC Class AC-1s concrete type will be adopted for all
concrete substructures. New services should be laid in trenches provided with clean
backfill.
It is considered, based on the findings of this investigation, that no further assessment or
mitigation measures are required.
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
47068886 Manor Royal, Crawley
December 2013
17
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
Figures
Title: Manor Royal, Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
Location: Crawley
Client: Harwoods Ltd
App’d:
Drawn:
PD
PD
Figure No: 1
Site Location Plan
Scale: NTS
TI Ch’kd:
Drg Size:
A4
Job No: 47068886
Date: December 2013
Note: Figure extracted from Landmark
Envirocheck report 27793979_1
BH7
BH8
BH9
BH6
BH4
BH3
BH1
BH11
BH10
BH2
BH5
Title
SITE LAYOUT PLAN
Location
CRAWLEY
Client
HARWOODS LTD
App’d:
PD
Drawn:
AD
BOREHOLE LOCATION
AD
Status:
Ref:
Scale:
Job No:
DRAFT
KEY:
TI Ch’kd: Drg.Size:
Date:
NTS
NOV 2013
A4
PD/AD/LON
47068886
FIGURE 2
J:\Wimbledon-Jobs\BOC Limited\49318646 BOC Manor Royal Crawley\General\Graphics\TI_Only\49318646_Ste_Lyt.ai
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
Appendix A - Borehole Logs
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG
Project Name and Site Location
BOREHOLE No
Client
BOC Crawley, Sussex
Date
Start Date
End Date
TBC
15-11-13
15-11-13
Ground Level (m)
Contractor
Sheet
Method / Plant Used
ADP
1 of 1
Sample / Test
Details
Water
Window Sampling Drilling Rig
PID (ppm)
Depth
BH07
Co-Ordinates ()
STRATA
Depth
Legend (Thickness)
0.09
(0.36)
BH07_0.4
DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
MADE GROUND. Tarmac.
MADE GROUND. Dark grey sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is
fine to medium of angular to subangular tarmac stone.
Sand is coarse.
NVO
Slight hydrocarbon
odour. Damp.
Olive green mottled grey sandy soft CLAY. Sand is fine to
medium. Lithorelics of fine to medium angular to
subangular siltstone.
NVO. Moist.
Geology becoming
harder and friable
with depth.
Instalation
/Backfill
Job No
Harwoods
0.45
0.3
0.5
BH07_1.0
1.0
<0.01
1.5
<0.01
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG 21/09/07 BOC CRAWLEY.GPJ AGS3_ALL.GDT 18/11/13
(2.55)
2.0
<0.01
2.5
<0.01
3.0
<0.01
3.00
Borehole terminated at target depth of 3.0m bgl.
WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS
Cement seal
Backfilled with on-site
soils.
Bentonite Fill
LEGEND
Road Pavement
Made Ground (Fill)
GENERAL
REMARKS
NVO - No Visulal or Olfactory
Observations
No installation.
Borehole Backfilled with on site
arisings.
BGL - Below Ground Level
Sandy CLAY
SAMPLE TYPE DETAILS
Environmental Sample
Groundwater Table
Water Strike
bgl = Below Ground Level
Logged By
M.Forman
Approved By
P.Donati
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG
Project Name and Site Location
BOREHOLE No
Client
BOC Crawley, Sussex
Date
Start Date
End Date
TBC
14-11-13
14-11-13
Ground Level (m)
Contractor
Sheet
Method / Plant Used
ADP
1 of 1
Sample / Test
Details
Water
Window Sampling Drilling Rig
PID (ppm)
Depth
BH08
Co-Ordinates ()
STRATA
Depth
Legend (Thickness)
0.10
BH08_0.2
(0.30)
0.40
<0.01
0.5
DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
Grass topped brown slightly sandy clayey topsoil.
MADE GROUND. Brown slightly sandy slightly gravelly
reworked CLAY. Gravels are of fine to medium angular to
subrounded of concrete and brick. Sand is fine.
Dry. NVO
Dry. NVO
Orange mottled grey sandy gravelly firm CLAY. Gravels
are of fine angular to subrounded natural stone.
NVO. Wet at 1.4m
bgl.
Orangey brown mottled grey firm sandy CLAY and
lithorelics of of weak orangey grey subangular fine
siltstone. Sand is fine.
Dry. NVO
Instalation
/Backfill
Job No
Harwoods
BH08_1.0
1.0
<0.01
1.5
<0.01
2.0
<0.01
2.5
<0.01
(1.20)
1.60
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG 21/09/07 BOC CRAWLEY.GPJ AGS3_ALL.GDT 18/11/13
(2.20)
3.0
<0.01
3.5
<0.01
3.80
Borehole terminated at target depth of 3.8m bgl.
WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS
Backfilled with on-site
soils.
Bentonite Fill
LEGEND
Topsoil
Made Ground (Fill)
Sandy CLAY
CLAY
SAMPLE TYPE DETAILS
GENERAL
REMARKS
NVO - No Visulal or Olfactory
Observations
No installation.
Borehole Backfilled with on site
arisings.
BGL - Below Ground Level
Environmental Sample
Groundwater Table
Water Strike
bgl = Below Ground Level
Logged By
M.Forman
Approved By
P.Donati
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG
Project Name and Site Location
BOREHOLE No
Client
BOC Crawley, Sussex
Date
Start Date
End Date
TBC
15-11-13
15-11-13
Ground Level (m)
Contractor
1 of 1
Water
Sample / Test
Details
PID (ppm)
Window Sampling Drilling Rig
STRATA
Depth
Legend (Thickness)
(0.24)
0.24
BH09_0.5
(0.50)
<0.01
0.5
0.73
0.74
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG 21/09/07 BOC CRAWLEY.GPJ AGS3_ALL.GDT 18/11/13
Sheet
Method / Plant Used
ADP
Depth
BH09
Co-Ordinates ()
WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS
Cement seal
DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
MADE GROUND. Concrete.
NVO
MADE GROUND. Reddish orange gravelly sand. Gravels
are fine to medium angular to subrounded of red brick and
concrete. Sand is coarse.
Dry. NVO.
MADE GROUND. Concrete slab.
Borehole terminated at 0.735m bgl due to refusal on
concrete.
NVO
LEGEND
Instalation
/Backfill
Job No
Harwoods
GENERAL
REMARKS
Backfilled with on-site
soils.
NVO - No Visulal or Olfactory
Observations
No installation.
Borehole Backfilled with on site
arisings.
BGL - Below Ground Level
SAMPLE TYPE DETAILS
Environmental Sample
Groundwater Table
Water Strike
bgl = Below Ground Level
Logged By
M.Forman
Approved By
P.Donati
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG
Project Name and Site Location
BOREHOLE No
Client
BOC Crawley, Sussex
Date
Start Date
End Date
TBC
15-11-13
15-11-13
Ground Level (m)
Contractor
Sheet
Method / Plant Used
ADP
1 of 1
Sample / Test
Details
Water
Window Sampling Drilling Rig
PID (ppm)
Depth
BH10
Co-Ordinates ()
STRATA
Depth
Legend (Thickness)
(0.25)
0.25
0.30
0.5
BH10_0.6
<0.01
1.0
BH10_1.1
<0.01
DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
MADE GROUND. Concrete.
Wet. NVO.
MADE GROUND. Brown slightly sandy slightly clayey
medium GRAVEL. Gravel is angular to subangular of fine
to medium concrete. Sand is coarse.
Orangey brown mottled grey firm CLAY. Some with
lithorelics of fine angular to subrounded siltstone.
Dry. NVO
Dry. NVO.
Becoming friable
with depth.
Instalation
/Backfill
Job No
Harwoods
(2.06)
1.5
<0.01
2.0
<0.01
2.36
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG 21/09/07 BOC CRAWLEY.GPJ AGS3_ALL.GDT 18/11/13
Borehole terminated at target depth of 2.36m bgl.
WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS
Cement seal
Backfilled with on-site
soils.
Bentonite Fill
LEGEND
Concrete
Made Ground (Fill)
GENERAL
REMARKS
NVO - No Visulal or Olfactory
Observations
No installation.
Borehole Backfilled with on site
arisings.
BGL - Below Ground Level
CLAY
SAMPLE TYPE DETAILS
Environmental Sample
Groundwater Table
Water Strike
bgl = Below Ground Level
Logged By
M.Forman
Approved By
P.Donati
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG
Project Name and Site Location
BOREHOLE No
Client
BOC Crawley, Sussex
Date
Start Date
End Date
TBC
15-11-13
15-11-13
Ground Level (m)
Contractor
Sheet
Method / Plant Used
ADP
1 of 1
Sample / Test
Details
Water
Window Sampling Drilling Rig
PID (ppm)
Depth
BH11
Co-Ordinates ()
STRATA
Depth
Legend (Thickness)
DESCRIPTION
COMMENTS
MADE GROUND. Concrete
NVO
MADE GROUND. Dark grey sandy slightly clayey fine to
medium GRAVEL. Gravel is angular to subrounded of
concrete and brick.
Olive slightly sandy firm CLAY. Sand is fine.
Staining. Wet at
0.4m bgl.
Damp. NVO
Yellow slightly sandy gravelly firm CLAY. Gravels are
angular to subrounded fine to medium of natural stone.
Sand is fine.
Damp. NVO
Instalation
/Backfill
Job No
Harwoods
(0.27)
BH11_0.3
0.27
0.45
0.5
0.3
1.0
<0.01
(0.95)
1.40
BH11_1.5
<0.01
1.5
(0.87)
<0.01
2.0
2.27
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG 21/09/07 BOC CRAWLEY.GPJ AGS3_ALL.GDT 18/11/13
Borehole terminated at target depth of 2.27m bgl.
WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS
Cement seal
Backfilled with on-site
soils.
Bentonite Fill
LEGEND
Concrete
Made Ground (Fill)
CLAY
Sandy Gravelly
CLAY
SAMPLE TYPE DETAILS
GENERAL
REMARKS
NVO - No Visulal or Olfactory
Observations
No installation.
Borehole Backfilled with on site
arisings.
BGL - Below Ground Level
Environmental Sample
Groundwater Table
Water Strike
bgl = Below Ground Level
Logged By
M.Forman
Approved By
P.Donati
Edwards, Manor Royal, Crawley
Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report
Appendix B - Contamination Tables and
Laboratory Certificates
Table 1
Analytical Schedule for Soil Samples
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC)
X
Poly Chlorinated Byphenils
(PCB)
X
Asbestos Screen
X
X
X
pH
Soluble Sulphate
X
X
Total Organic Carbon
(TOC)
2013 data
X
X
X
X
PolyCyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
2009 data
BH
BH1
BH1
BH2
BH2
BH3
BH3
BH4
BH4
BH5
BH6
BH6
BH6 (DUPLICATE)
BH08
BH08
BH10
BH10
BH11
BH11
BH09
BH07
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Phase of SI
CLEA Metals
Analysis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Table 2
Miscellaneous Soil Data
Depth (m)
Units
Water Soluble Sulphate as SO4 2:1 Extract
Total Organic Carbon
Moisture
Stones content (>50mm)
Asbestos Containing Material Screen
pH Value
g/l
%
%
%
NONE
pH Units
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
BH1
0.5
0.015
0.3
6.3
BH1
1.0
4.93
BH2
0.2
0.061
<0.2
No ACM Detected
9.41
2009 data
BH2
BH3
0.4
0.2
0.16
5.76
10.28
BH4
0.4
0.47
1.6
No ACM Detected
10.88
BH5
0.7
0.016
<0.2
7.46
BH6
0.6
0.14
-
BH08
0.2
2.1
10.8
<0.02
BH08
1
0.49
11
<0.02
BH10
0.6
0.33
17.8
<0.02
2013 data
BH10
BH11
1.1
0.3
0.38
3.4
11.7
21.5
<0.02
<0.02
BH11
1.5
0.43
17.2
<0.02
BH09
0.5
1.1
9.8
<0.02
BH07
0.4
0.24
13.1
<0.02
No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected No ACM Detected
8.15
8.3
7.9
7.2
5.4
5.9
4.7
11.2
7.7
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Table 3
Concentrations of Metals in Soils
Depth (m)
Units
MDL
HH GAC
CW GAC
BH1
0.5
BH1
1.0
BH2
0.2
BH2
0.4
2009 data
BH3
BH3
0.2
0.3-0.4
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
2
0.1
5
5
5
0.1
5
0.2
5
640
230
8840
71700
6010
354
1800
13000
665000
25.00202156
NA
240
0.1
259.2
0.5
1.00E+01
1
0.304
3
ND
52
33
20
ND
34
ND
120
4
ND
33
22
23
ND
16
ND
47
7
ND
28
32
8
ND
25
ND
53
ND
ND
24
15
16
ND
16
ND
43
9
ND
15
17
37
ND
16
ND
38
XX
XX
ND
NA
RPD
MDL
ND
0.3
35
24
17
ND
34
ND
70
BH4
0.4
BH5
0.7
BH6
0.6
BH6
1.0
BH08
0.2
BH08
1
BH10
0.6
4
ND
18
47
28
3.1
25
ND
53
ND
ND
42
27
25
ND
37
ND
71
ND
ND
18
11
26
ND
13
ND
49
ND
ND
45
32
32
ND
31
ND
71
16
0.89
210
53
210
1.1
550
0.28
150
12
0.21
33
11
34
ND
35
0.23
50
12
0.17
35
15
28
ND
27
0.3
49
2013 data
BH10
BH11
1.1
0.3
5.7
0.22
40
24
28
ND
32
ND
62
8.3
0.21
40
58
38
ND
41
0.21
62
BH11
1.5
BH09
0.5
BH07
0.4
2.1
ND
32
23
26
ND
15
ND
39
25
0.16
8.1
61
130
0.27
9.3
ND
92
11
0.2
31
18
29
ND
23
ND
52
= Value Exceeds CW GAC
= Value Exceeds CW and HH GAC
= Not Detected
= Non Available
= Relative Percentage Difference
= Method Detection Limit
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Table 4
Concentrations of TPH and PCB in Soils.
2009 data
BH3
BH4
0.3-0.4
0.4
Depth (m)
Units
HH GAC
CW GAC
BH1
0.5
BH1
1.0
BH2
0.2
BH3
0.2
GRO Surrogate
GRO (C4-C12)
MTBE
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Sum of Xylenes
Aliphatics C5-C6
Aliphatics >C6-C8
Aliphatics >C8-C10
Aliphatics >C10-C12
Aliphatics >C12-C16
Aliphatics >C16-C21
Aliphatics >C21-C35
Total Aliphatics C5-C35
Aromatics C6-C7
Aromatics >C7-C8
Aromatics >EC8-EC10
Aromatics >EC10-EC12
Aromatics >EC12-EC16
Aromatics >EC16-EC21
Aromatics >EC21-EC35
Total Aromatics C6-C35
TPH (Aliphatics and Aromatics C5-C35)
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
No Criterion
No Criterion
38400
1380000
1380000
No Criterion
34400
28100
28400
No Criterion
No Criterion
No Criterion
No Criterion
9350.587758
1001304.438
1001304.438
No Criterion
2.62E+00
7.377092384
65.71954558
No Criterion
No Criterion
120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1
8.4
43
54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
17
17
71
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCBs (vs Aroclor 1254)
mg/kg
34.8
0.159505317
-
-
-
-
-
XX
XX
ND
2013 data
BH10
BH11
1.1
0.3
BH4
0.7-1.0
BH5
0.7
BH6
0.6
BH6
1.0
BH08
0.2
BH08
1
BH10
0.6
97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.5
20
58
82
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
11
72
84
170
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.16
2
31
33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
27
27
60
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
310
ND
ND
ND
0.41
-
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
BH11
1.5
BH09
0.5
BH07
0.4
ND
ND
2900
ND
-
-
-
-
= Value Exceeds CW GAC
= Value Exceeds CW and HH GAC
= Not Detected
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Table 5
Concentrations of SVOC and PAH in Soils
2009 data
BH3
BH4
0.3-0.4
0.4
Depth (m)
Units
HH GAC
CW GAC
BH1
0.5
BH2
0.2
BH3
0.2
Phenols
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PAHs
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
72600.0
73300
5.18E+05
89.7
14.3
101
658
143
140
12.8
22600
59200
60.4
95.6
21800
54200
5.454820183
0.953528863
0.003265625
0.013057649
3.74E-02
No Criterion
No Criterion
No Criterion
0.924445002
0.003132148
0.010558309
3.605162493
No Criterion
0.009086469
2.872243737
8.187171867
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Phthalates
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butylbenzyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-Octyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
-
-
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Other Semi-volatiles
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
4-Bromophenylphenylether
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenylphenylether
4-Nitroaniline
Azobenzene
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Carbazole
Dibenzofuran
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Isophorone
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
XX
XX
ND
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
2013 data
BH10
BH11
1.1
0.3
BH4
0.7-1.0
BH5
0.7
BH6
0.6
BH08
0.2
BH08
1
BH10
0.6
BH11
1.5
BH09
0.5
BH07
0.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14
ND
0.86
3.1
3
2.6
1.5
2.2
3.1
0.35
7.9
0.12
1.8
ND
3.3
6.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.8
0.81
13
27
23
21
16
17
28
5.1
59
3.7
17
0.32
35
46
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.13
0.55
ND
0.65
0.13
ND
0.34
ND
ND
ND
0.22
0.28
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14
ND
ND
0.22
ND
0.23
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
ND
0.23
0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
= Value Exceeds CW GAC
= Value Exceeds CW and HH GAC
= Not Detected
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Table 6
Concentrations of VOC in Soils
Depth (m)
Units
4-Bromofluorobenzene % Surrogate Recovery %
Dibromofluoromethane % Surrogate Recovery %
Toluene-d8 % Surrogate Recovery
%
1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/kg
1.1.1-Trichloroethane
mg/kg
1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/kg
1.1.2-Trichloroethane
mg/kg
1.1-Dichloroethane
mg/kg
1.1-Dichloroethene
mg/kg
1.1-Dichloropropene
mg/kg
1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene
mg/kg
1.2.3-Trichloropropane
mg/kg
1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
mg/kg
1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene
mg/kg
1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
mg/kg
1.2-Dibromoethane
mg/kg
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg
1.2-Dichloroethane
mg/kg
1.2-Dichloropropane
mg/kg
1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene
mg/kg
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg
1.3-Dichloropropane
mg/kg
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg
2.2-Dichloropropane
mg/kg
2-Chlorotoluene
mg/kg
4-Chlorotoluene
mg/kg
4-Isopropyltoluene
mg/kg
Benzene
mg/kg
Bromobenzene
mg/kg
Bromochloromethane
mg/kg
Bromodichloromethane
mg/kg
Bromoform
mg/kg
Bromomethane
mg/kg
Carbon Disulphide
mg/kg
Carbontetrachloride
mg/kg
Chlorobenzene
mg/kg
Chloroethane
mg/kg
Chloroform
mg/kg
Chloromethane
mg/kg
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene
mg/kg
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene
mg/kg
Dibromochloromethane
mg/kg
Dibromomethane
mg/kg
Dichlorodifluoromethane
mg/kg
Dichloromethane
mg/kg
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene
mg/kg
Isopropylbenzene
mg/kg
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
mg/kg
Naphthalene
mg/kg
n-Butylbenzene
mg/kg
o-Xylene
mg/kg
p/m-Xylene
mg/kg
Propylbenzene
mg/kg
sec-Butylbenzene
mg/kg
Styrene
mg/kg
tert-Butylbenzene
mg/kg
Tetrachloroethene
mg/kg
Toluene
mg/kg
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene
mg/kg
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene
mg/kg
Trichloroethene
mg/kg
Trichlorofluoromethane
mg/kg
Vinyl Chloride
mg/kg
XX
XX
ND
URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd
HH GAC
CW GAC
BH1
0.5
BH2
0.2
2009 data
BH4
BH4
0.4
0.7-1.0
BH5
0.7
BH6
0.6
BH08
0.2
BH08
1
BH10
0.6
2013 data
BH10
BH11
1.1
0.3
BH11
1.5
BH09
0.5
BH07
0.4
No Criterion
No Criterion
No Criterion
19.2
3340
29500
5.48
-
No Criterion
No Criterion
No Criterion
0.123652977
0.007167047
0.061929403
0.00882385
-
90
130
92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.011
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
92
81
91
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
78
9.8
91
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
97
130
94
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
75
110
88
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0028
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0011
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0039
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0036
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0033
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0037
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0018
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
96
110
95
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.005
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0017
ND
ND
0.0076
ND
ND
= Value Exceeds CW GAC
= Value Exceeds CW and HH GAC
= Not Detected
Phase II Geoenvironmental Site Investigation
Harwoods - Crawley
November 2013
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
SW1P 1PL
FAO M Forman
20 November 2013
Dear M Forman
Test Report Number
244734
Your Project Reference
BOC Crawley
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 18 November 2013.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
•
The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
•
The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
•
Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
•
The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
•
Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
•
The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
•
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
2183
Test Report
244734 Cover Sheet
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
SW1P 1PL
FAO M Forman
20 November 2013
Dear M Forman
Test Report Number
244734
Your Project Reference
BOC Crawley
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 18 November 2013.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to customerservices@chemtest.co.uk. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
•
The sign < means 'less than'
•
Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
•
Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
•
Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
•
Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
•
n/e means 'not evaluated'
•
i/s means 'insufficient sample'
•
u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
•
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
•
The results relate only to the items tested
•
All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
•
The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
•
For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
•
Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
•
None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Test Report
244734 Cover Sheet
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Login Batch No
Chemtest LIMS ID
Sample ID
Sample No
Sampling Date
Depth
Matrix
SOPi Determinandi
2010 pH
2625 Total Organic Carbon
2450 Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Selenium
Zinc
2670 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2700 Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
CAS Noi
7440382
7440439
7440473
7440508
7439976
7440020
7439921
7782492
7440666
91203
208968
83329
86737
85018
120127
206440
129000
56553
218019
205992
207089
Unitsi
%
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
AJ44379
BH08
AJ44380
BH08
AJ44381
BH10
AJ44382
BH10
AJ44383
BH11
AJ44384
BH11
Not Provided
0.20m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.00m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.60m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.10m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.30m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.50m
SOIL
8.3
2.1
16
0.89
210
53
1.1
550
210
0.28
150
310 ¹
0.32
0.81
3.8
3.7
35
13
59
46
27
28
21
17
7.9
0.49
12
0.21
33
11
<0.10
35
34
0.23
50
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
0.22
< 0.1
0.34
0.28
0.1
0.13
0.55
0.65
7.2
0.33
12
0.17
35
15
<0.10
27
28
0.30
49
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
5.4
0.38
5.7
0.22
40
24
<0.10
32
28
<0.20
62
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
5.9
3.4
8.3
0.21
40
58
<0.10
41
38
0.21
62
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
0.23
0.14
0.24
0.13
< 0.1
< 0.1
0.22
0.23
4.7
0.43
2.1
<0.10
32
23
<0.10
15
26
<0.20
39
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
*
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
All tests undertaken between 18/11/2013 and 20/11/2013
Column page 1
* Accreditation status
Report page 1 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Login Batch No
Chemtest LIMS ID
Sample ID
Sample No
Sampling Date
Depth
Matrix
SOPi Determinandi
2010 pH
2625 Total Organic Carbon
2450 Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Selenium
Zinc
2670 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
2700 Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
CAS Noi
7440382
7440439
7440473
7440508
7439976
7440020
7439921
7782492
7440666
91203
208968
83329
86737
85018
120127
206440
129000
56553
218019
205992
207089
Unitsi
%
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
AJ44385
BH09
AJ44386
BH07
Not Provided
0.50m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.40m
SOIL
11.2
1.1
25
0.16
8.1
61
0.27
9.3
130
<0.20
92
2900 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
7.7
0.24
11
0.20
31
18
<0.10
23
29
<0.20
52
< 10 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
*
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
Column page 2
* Accreditation status
Report page 1 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2700 Benzo[a]pyrene
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Total (of 16) PAHs
2760 Methyl tert-butylether
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Dichloromethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Bromochloromethane
Trichloromethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloromethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
50328
53703
193395
191242
1634044
75718
74873
75014
74839
75003
75694
75354
75092
156605
75343
156592
74975
67663
71556
56235
563586
71432
107062
79016
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
M
M
M
U
M
M
N
M
M
M
U
M
M
M
U
M
M
U
AJ44379
BH08
AJ44380
BH08
AJ44381
BH10
AJ44382
BH10
AJ44383
BH11
AJ44384
BH11
Not Provided
0.20m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.00m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.60m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.10m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.30m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.50m
SOIL
23
5.1
17
16
320
3.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
0.13
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
2.4
2.8 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
3.9 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
3.6 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
7.6 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
3.3 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
All tests undertaken between 18/11/2013 and 20/11/2013
Column page 1
* Accreditation status
Report page 2 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2700 Benzo[a]pyrene
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
Total (of 16) PAHs
2760 Methyl tert-butylether
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Dichloromethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Bromochloromethane
Trichloromethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloromethane
1,1-Dichloropropene
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
50328
53703
193395
191242
1634044
75718
74873
75014
74839
75003
75694
75354
75092
156605
75343
156592
74975
67663
71556
56235
563586
71432
107062
79016
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
M
M
M
U
M
M
N
M
M
M
U
M
M
M
U
M
M
U
AJ44385
BH09
AJ44386
BH07
Not Provided
0.50m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.40m
SOIL
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
3.7 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
<2
1.8 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 20 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
ne ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
Column page 2
* Accreditation status
Report page 2 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2760 1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
m- & p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tribromomethane
Isopropylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
2-Chlorotoluene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
78875
74953
75274
10061015
108883
10061026
79005
127184
142289
124481
106934
108907
630206
100414
1330207
95476
100425
75252
98828
108861
96184
103651
95498
95636
106434
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
M
M
M
N
M
N
M
M
U
U
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
M
M
N
U
M
M
U
AJ44379
BH08
AJ44380
BH08
AJ44381
BH10
AJ44382
BH10
AJ44383
BH11
AJ44384
BH11
Not Provided
0.20m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.00m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.60m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.10m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.30m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.50m
SOIL
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
1.1 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
1.7 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
All tests undertaken between 18/11/2013 and 20/11/2013
Column page 1
* Accreditation status
Report page 3 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2760 1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
m- & p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tribromomethane
Isopropylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
2-Chlorotoluene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
78875
74953
75274
10061015
108883
10061026
79005
127184
142289
124481
106934
108907
630206
100414
1330207
95476
100425
75252
98828
108861
96184
103651
95498
95636
106434
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
M
M
M
N
M
N
M
M
U
U
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
U
M
M
N
U
M
M
U
AJ44385
BH09
AJ44386
BH07
Not Provided
0.50m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.40m
SOIL
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 5.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 2.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 10 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
Column page 2
* Accreditation status
Report page 3 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2760 tert-Butylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
4-Isopropyltoluene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
98066
108678
135988
541731
99876
106467
104518
95501
96128
120821
87683
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
AJ44379
BH08
AJ44380
BH08
AJ44381
BH10
AJ44382
BH10
AJ44383
BH11
AJ44384
BH11
Not Provided
0.20m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.00m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.60m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.10m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.30m
SOIL
Not Provided
1.50m
SOIL
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
All tests undertaken between 18/11/2013 and 20/11/2013
Column page 1
* Accreditation status
Report page 4 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Report Date
20 November 2013
BOC Crawley
244734
2760 tert-Butylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
4-Isopropyltoluene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
98066
108678
135988
541731
99876
106467
104518
95501
96128
120821
87683
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
µg kg-¹
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
M
U
AJ44385
BH09
AJ44386
BH07
Not Provided
0.50m
SOIL
Not Provided
0.40m
SOIL
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 50 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
< 1.0 ¹
¹No sampling date was specified, stability times for this analyte may have been exceeded and these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
Column page 2
* Accreditation status
Report page 4 of 4
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
URS
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
6-8 Greencoat Place
Asbestos in Soils
London
Results of analysis of 8 samples
received 18 November 2013
BOC Crawley
SW1P 1PL
FAO
M Forman
Login Batch No:
244734
Qualitative Results
SOP 2190
ACM Type
Chemtest ID
AJ44379
AJ44380
AJ44381
AJ44382
AJ44383
AJ44384
AJ44385
AJ44386
Report Date
20 November 2013
Sample ID
BH08
BH08
BH10
BH10
BH11
BH11
BH09
BH07
Sample Desc
Depth (m)
0.20
1.00
0.60
1.10
0.30
1.50
0.50
0.40
Asbestos Identification
UKAS Accredited
UKAS Accredited
-
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
No Asbestos Detected
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Signed
Steve McGrath
Asbestos Analyst
All tests undertaken between 20-Nov-2013 and 20-Nov-2013 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ44379 to AJ44386
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
SW1P 1PL
FAO M Forman
25 November 2013
Dear M Forman
Test Report Number
244737i Interim Test Report
Your Project Reference
BOC Crawley
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 18 November 2013.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to customerservices@chemtest.co.uk. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
•
The sign < means 'less than'
•
Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
•
Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
•
Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
•
Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
•
n/e means 'not evaluated'
•
i/s means 'insufficient sample'
•
u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
•
Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
•
The results relate only to the items tested
•
All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
•
The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
•
For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
•
Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
•
None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Test Report
244737 Cover Sheet
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
CEN 10:1 CUMULATIVE TWO STAGE BATCH TEST
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
Results of analysis of 4 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
Report Date
25 November 2013
BOC Crawley
FAO M Forman
Login Batch No
244737
Chemtest LIMS ID
Sample ID
Sample No
Sampling Date
Depth
AJ44411 Soil: AJ44409
BH11
Landfill Waste Acceptance
Criteria Limits
00:00:00
1.50m
Inert Waste
Landfill
Solid Waste Analysis
Determinand i
Total Organic Carbon
Loss on Ignition
Total BTEX
TPH Total WAC
Total (of 17) PAHs
pH
Acid Neutralisation Capacity
SOP i
2625
2610
2761
2670
2700
2010
2015
mol kg-¹
*
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
N
N
N
2:1
Eluate
mg l-¹
0.001
0.009
<0.0005
<0.001
0.002
<0.0005
<0.001
0.011
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.02
5.4
0.18
79
150
<0.030
4.7
Eluate Analysis
Determinand i
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Lead
Antimony
Selenium
Zinc
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Phenol Index
Dissolved Organic Carbon
SOP i
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1220
1220
1220
1040
1920
1610
Solid Information
Dry mass of test portion/kg
Moisture (%)
Units i
%
%
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
*
M
N
M
M
N
M
N
0.46
2.78
<0.005
< 10
<2
6.5
0.104
8:1
Eluate
mg l-¹
0.001
0.002
<0.0005
<0.001
<0.001
<0.0005
<0.001
0.009
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.006
0.55
0.16
30
48
<0.030
1.8
2:1
Eluate
mg kg-¹
<0.05
<0.5
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.5
10.8
<1
158
300
<0.5
<50
Cumulative 10:1
Eluate
mg kg-¹
<0.05
<0.5
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
<0.01
<0.05
0.09
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.5
8.53
1.61
330
544
<0.5
<50
3
Stable
Non-reactive
Hazardous
Hazardous
Waste in Non- Waste Landfill
Hazardous
Landfill
5
6
10
6
500
100
>6
To evaluate
To evaluate
Limit values for compliance leaching test
using BS EN 12457-3 at L/S 10 l/kg
0.5
20
0.04
0.5
2
0.01
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.06
0.1
4
800
10
1000
4000
1
500
2
100
1
10
50
0.2
10
10
10
0.7
0.5
50
15000
150
20000
60000
25
300
5
70
100
2
30
40
50
5
7
200
25000
500
50000
100000
800
1000
Leach Test Information
0.175
17.7
Leachant volume 1st extract/l
Leachant volume 2nd extract/l
Eluate recovered from 1st extract/l
All tests undertaken between 18-Nov-2013 and 22-Nov-2013
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
0.312
1.4
0.1092
Column page 1
Report Page 1 of 2
LIMS sample ID range AJ44409 to AJ44412
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
CEN 10:1 CUMULATIVE TWO STAGE BATCH TEST
URS
6-8 Greencoat Place
London
Results of analysis of 4 samples
received 18 November 2013
SW1P 1PL
Report Date
25 November 2013
BOC Crawley
FAO M Forman
Login Batch No
244737
Chemtest LIMS ID
Sample ID
Sample No
Sampling Date
Depth
AJ44412 Soil: AJ44410
BH09
Landfill Waste Acceptance
Criteria Limits
00:00:00
0.50m
Inert Waste
Landfill
Solid Waste Analysis
Determinand i
Total Organic Carbon
Loss on Ignition
Total BTEX
TPH Total WAC
Total (of 17) PAHs
pH
Acid Neutralisation Capacity
SOP i
2625
2610
2761
2670
2700
2010
2015
mol kg-¹
*
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
N
N
N
2:1
Eluate
mg l-¹
0.012
0.033
<0.0005
<0.001
0.035
<0.005
0.067
0.005
0.002
0.004
0.008
0.099
130
0.25
1500
2100
<0.030
29
Eluate Analysis
Determinand i
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Lead
Antimony
Selenium
Zinc
Chloride
Fluoride
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Phenol Index
Dissolved Organic Carbon
SOP i
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1450
1220
1220
1220
1040
1920
1610
Solid Information
Dry mass of test portion/kg
Moisture (%)
Units i
%
%
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
mg kg-¹
*
M
N
M
M
N
M
N
0.71
2.95
<0.005
1500
<2
11.5
0.086
8:1
Eluate
mg l-¹
0.008
0.026
<0.0005
<0.001
0.01
<0.0005
0.012
<0.001
<0.001
0.002
0.003
0.082
8
0.15
1400
1400
<0.030
10
2:1
Eluate
mg kg-¹
<0.05
<0.5
<0.01
<0.05
0.07
<0.01
0.13
<0.05
<0.01
0.01
0.02
<0.5
260
<1
3000
4190
<0.5
57.9
Cumulative 10:1
Eluate
mg kg-¹
0.08
<0.5
<0.01
<0.05
0.13
<0.01
0.18
<0.05
<0.01
0.02
0.04
0.84
218
1.61
14100
14800
<0.5
122
3
Stable
Non-reactive
Hazardous
Hazardous
Waste in Non- Waste Landfill
Hazardous
Landfill
5
6
10
6
500
100
>6
To evaluate
To evaluate
Limit values for compliance leaching test
using BS EN 12457-3 at L/S 10 l/kg
0.5
20
0.04
0.5
2
0.01
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.06
0.1
4
800
10
1000
4000
1
500
2
100
1
10
50
0.2
10
10
10
0.7
0.5
50
15000
150
20000
60000
25
300
5
70
100
2
30
40
50
5
7
200
25000
500
50000
100000
800
1000
Leach Test Information
0.175
9.57
Leachant volume 1st extract/l
Leachant volume 2nd extract/l
Eluate recovered from 1st extract/l
All tests undertaken between 18-Nov-2013 and 22-Nov-2013
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
0.331
1.4
0.1985
Column page 1
Report Page 2 of 2
LIMS sample ID range AJ44409 to AJ44412