•
•
•
•
•
http://blog.victoryenergy.com/
http://www.clipartbest.com
•
•
http://www.popsci.com/see-beautiful-pictures-ges-new-environmentally-friendly-train
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pittsburgh_WEO_Night_1.jpg
•
•
•
•
•
http://www.port.pittsburgh.pa.us/index.aspx
SD70M2SD70M-2SD70M-2SD70M-2
•
•
•
SD70M-2
•
•
•
http://www.emdiesels.com/emdweb/products/sd70m.jsp
Decision Matrix
-Identified customers as being citizens of a specific city
-Point Distribution: (Little importance) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, (Most Important)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Emissions/Regulatory requirements
Costs: fuel, infrastructure, etc.
Freight throughput/capacity
Public opinion
On-time delivery
5
3
2
4
1
Original Ideas
Scale: (bad) 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (good)
Concept
Emissions(x5)
Costs (x3)
Throughput (x2)
Public (x4)
On time (x1)
Total
Decreasing
Thickness
0
6
10
12
5
33
Hybrid Engine
25
0
10
12
5
52
Steam Model
15
9
2
12
3
41
Regenerative
Braking
25
15
10
16
5
71
Aftertreatment
25
6
10
20
5
66
Barges
25
12
10
12
1
60
Decision: In order to be implemented the concept needed to be a minimum of 60 points.
•
•
•
- Locomotive NOx must reduced from 5.5 (g/hp-hr) to 1.3 (g/hp-hr)
- Particulate Matter must go from 0.2 (g/hp-hr) to 0.03 (g/hp-hr)
https://cms.psu.
edu/Fall2/201516FA/201516FAUP___REDSGN100_023/
_assoc/77B982A483724DE0884236338DF1A710/GE_Sli
des.pdf
Diesel fuel
DC
•
•
•
•
•
http://www.sterlingrail.com/classifieds/classified.php?id=2478
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html
•
•
•
•
•
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNDWzFaiDZQ&list=PL3mNee2cpk41AozCJHkhbqBU3y8WhgXkd
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
http://business.tenntom.org/why-use-the-waterway/shipping-comparisons/
Savings Calculations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8clK9qSGlk
http://cumminsengines.com/cummins-aftertreatment-system
http://www.mtu-online.com/fileadmin/fm-dam/mtu-global/technical-info/whitepapers/3100691_MTU_General_WhitePaper_SCR_2014.pdf
Final Costs:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sell 15 mineral locomotives (3 trains): $1.5 million each = $22.5 million
Cost of aftertreatment unit: $100,000 x 35 locomotives = $3.5 million
Cost of DEF: $75,834.57 per year
Cost of Construction per barge: $225,000 x (40 barges)= $9 million
Cost of Implementing regenerative braking = $2,520,000
Savings to using barges = $498,593 per year
Savings due to regenerative braking = 10% reduction in fuel use =
$5,824,468.08
Total (initial): [($22,500,000) - ($3,500,000 + $9,000,000 + $2,520,000)] =
$7,480,000
Total over 10 years: [$7,480,000 - ($75,834.57 * 10) + ($498,593 * 10) +
http://www.caria.org/barges_tugboats.html
($5,824,468 * 10)] = $69,952,264.3
So did our locomotives meet Tier 4?
Yes we did!
● NOx went from 5.5 g/hp-hr to 0.525 g/hp-hr (Tier 4 requires 1.3 g/hp-hr)
● Particulate Matter went from 0.2 g/hp-hr to 0.018 g/hp-hr (Tier 4 requires
0.03 g/hp-hr)
Conclusion
•
•
http://cumminsengines.com/
Works Cited
●
http://business.tenntom.org/why-use-the-waterway/shipping-comparisons/
●
http://www.caria.org/barges_tugboats.html
●
http://cumminsengines.com/
●
http://www.emdiesels.com/emdweb/products/sd70m.jsp
●
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html
●
http://www.mtu-online.com/fileadmin/fm-dam/mtu-global/technical-info/whitepapers/3100691_MTU_General_WhitePaper_SCR_2014.pdf
●
http://www.port.pittsburgh.pa.us/index.aspx
●
http://www.port.pittsburgh.pa.us/index.aspx?page=97
●
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=kNDWzFaiDZQ&list=PL3mNee2cpk41AozCJHkhbqBU3y8WhgXkd