Double Platinum LEED Performance: National Grid Optimal Lighting

advertisement
Double Platinum LEED Performance:
National Grid Optimal Lighting/Minimal Energy
Terr Clark,
Terry
Clark Fo
Founder
nder & CEO – Finelite,
Finelite Inc
Inc.
What is good lighting?
It’s
It
s hard to quantify
ƒ IALD metric of quality (Still being developed)
quality
y of the visual environment
ƒ IES q
(Still being developed)
ƒ Visually comfortable
ƒ Appropriate
A
i t illuminance
ill i
YOU KNOW IT WHEN YOU SEE IT!
Page ƒ 2
Page ƒ 3
Page ƒ 4
New drivers for lighting
ƒ Building energy codes and
standards
- ASHRAE / IES
Standard 90.1
- IECC
- California Title 24
- IGCC
- ASHRAE 189
ƒ G
Green building
b ildi certification
tifi ti
programs
ƒ Advocacy
y groups
g
ƒ Professional organizations
Page ƒ 5
The evolving ASHRAE / IES standard 90.1
Open office as an example:
ƒ 90.1 - 1999
1 5 w/ft2 plus 0
1.5
0.35
35 w/ft2 VDT allowance
ƒ 90.1 - 2001
No change
ƒ 90.1 - 2004
Office allowance 1.1 w/ft2 plus a 0.35 w/ft2 VDT allowance
ƒ 90.1 - 2007
No more VDT allowance
ƒ 90.1 - 2010
0 97 w/ft2
0.97
Page ƒ 6
Refining “good” lighting as an essential building element
“Sustainable
lighting design
meets
t the
th
qualitative needs
of the visual
environment with
the least impact
on the natural
environment.”
International Association of Lighting Designers, 2001
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2003
Page ƒ 7
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Appealing
Efficient
S t i bl
Sustainable
Enlivening
Provocative
Engaging
Comfortable
Designers
Codes
Good Lighting
E
Energy
Code
C d
Visual Quality,
Health, & Wellbeing
No
Nothing
Daylighting
2% daylight for 75%
regularly occupied spaces
New 90.1 top lighting
allowances
Energy
gy Efficiency
y
Cumulative 14% ≤
ASHRAE/IES Std. 90.1 - 2007
Standard 90.1 - 2007
IECC 2007 CA Title 24
Controls
Individual control,
y g dimming
g
daylight
Occupancy controls
Dark Sky
Limited skyward light
depending on
environmental zone
Energy standards, IDA
Model Ltg Ordinance
Page ƒ 8
Q: What does it take to achieve remarkable high performance lighting?
Page ƒ 9
Q: What does it take to achieve remarkable high performance lighting?
A: Collaboration
Page ƒ 10
Q: What does it take to achieve remarkable high performance lighting?
A: Collaboration
This is the story of National Grid
Page ƒ 11
Who are they?
National Grid is an international
electricity and gas company.
They are one of the largest
energy companies
i iin th
the world.
ld
Page ƒ 12
National Grid
What were their goals?
ƒ Build a benchmark building
g in energy
gy
performance as U.S. Headquarters
ƒ Demonstrate low energy lighting to their clients
ƒ Create an attractive workplace for the National Grid staff
Page ƒ 13
National Grid
How to achieve their goals?
ƒ Assemble a collaborative team that will work toward
sustainable goals with a focus on lighting.
ƒ Set aggressive Lighting Power Density (LPD) targets
ƒ Closely integrate lighting design with the interior design
Page ƒ 14
Typical lighting information flow
Page ƒ 15
National Grid lighting information flow
Page ƒ 16
National Grid
How to achieve their goals?
ƒ Set aggressive
gg
Lighting
g
g Power Density
y ((LPD)) targets
g
Page ƒ 17
National Grid
ƒ The client had an LPD target! 0.65 w/ft2 or 35%
below code before we started the project.
Page ƒ 18
National Grid
Page ƒ 19
National Grid
Page ƒ 20
National Grid
LPD: How do you get there?
Collaboration and a confluence of good design decisions.
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Page ƒ 21
Right sizing the illuminance
Task/ambient/vertical
Lamp and ballast
Efficient fixtures
Reflectances
Furniture layout
National Grid
Page ƒ 22
National Grid
Page ƒ 23
National Grid - High efficiency fixtures
Page ƒ 24
National Grid - High efficiency fixtures
Page ƒ 25
National Grid
Page ƒ 26
National Grid
How to achieve their goals?
ƒ Assemble a collaborative team that will work toward
sustainable goals with a focus on lighting.
ƒ Set aggressive Lighting Power Density (LPD) targets
ƒ Closely integrate lighting design with the interior design
Page ƒ 27
Collaboration
Page ƒ 28
Collaboration
Page ƒ 29
Breakthrough
i G
in
Generall Li
Lighting
hti
An Overview
Page ƒ 30
Finding # 1 – Light the task first
Make LIGHTING THE TASK
properl your
properly
o r FIRST priority!
priorit !
ƒ Use task lighting as the
PRIMARY layer of light
ƒ New, LED task luminaires
provide the right amount of
light
g exactly
y where yyou need it
ƒ Old, fluorescent task luminaires
simply do not work
- Too much light
- Too much glare
- Too much energy
gy
Page ƒ 31
#1
Finding # 2 – Light the vertical surfaces
Page ƒ 32
#2
Finding # 3 – Ambient light needs only 0.4 w/ft2
When,
Wh
ƒ Task lighting is
correct,
ƒ Vertical surfaces
are lighted
Then,
ƒ Ambient lighting
needs only 0.4 w/ft2
Page ƒ 33
#3
Finding # 3 – High-efficiency T8 luminaires
Use high-efficiency
pendant T8 luminaires
with only 1-lamp in
cross section
ƒ 1-lamp
1l
T8 cross section
ti
ƒ Over 90 lumens/watt
ƒ 12 to 16 ft on center
ƒ 0.4 w/ft2
0.4 w/ft2 works!
Page ƒ 34
ƒ $2
$2.33/ft
33/ft2 installed cost
#3
Finding # 3 – High-performance recessed luminaires
High-performance recessed
luminaires can also be used
t provide
to
id ambient
bi t lilight
ht att
0.4-0.5 w/ft2
ƒ 2-lamp T8
- 0.71 BF
- Over 80 lumens/watt
- 8’ x 10’ on center spacing
- 0.49 w/ft2
0.4 - 0.5 w/ft2 works!
Page ƒ 35
ƒ 1-lamp T8
- 1.20 BF
- Over 85 lumens/watt
- 8’ x 10’ on center spacing
- 0.40 w/ft2
ƒ Advantages of 1-lamp approach:
- 50% fewer lamps
- 20% energy savings
over 2-lamp
#3
Key results summary
Three “layers of light” satisfy users at under 0.5 w/ft2
Page ƒ 36
ƒ
When task lighting is not done properly,
all carry part of the load
ƒ
User satisfaction is achieved with half of
the energy used before
ƒ
Less material is used
ƒ
Fewer lighting controls are needed
ƒ
Installation costs are optimized
ƒ
Air conditioning loads are reduced
ƒ
Operating costs are slashed
Verify the quality: Task
Luminance (cd/m2)
Task (fc)
3
2
1
12
7
130
30
48
54
68
1
Page ƒ 37
Meets targets
1
Luminance Uniformity Ratios
Around Seating Area = 11:1
Across Broad Viewing Areas = 26:1
Verify the quality: Vertical
Luminance (cd/m2)
Vertical (fc)
12
25
47
9
5
130
2
2
4
9
1
Page ƒ 38
Meets targets
1
Luminance Uniformity Ratios
Around Seating Area = 33:1
Across Broad Viewing Areas = 1.3:1
Adding the layers and verify the quality: Task + Vertical
Luminance (cd/m2)
Task + Vertical (fc)
15
26
49
12
21
130
32
50
58
77
2
Page ƒ 39
Meets targets
2
Luminance Uniformity Ratios
Around Seating Area = 6:1
Across Broad Viewing Areas = 2.2:1
Verify the quality: Ambient
Luminance (cd/m2)
Ambient (fc)
225
9
11
29
18
130
18
20
26
Page ƒ 40
59
32
Meets targets
14
Luminance Uniformity Ratios
Around Seating Area = 5:1
Across Broad Viewing Areas = 0.5:1
Adding all the layers and verify the quality
Task + Vertical + Ambient (fc)
Luminance (cd/m2)
240
60
35
50
30
130
50
70
90
136
28
Page ƒ 41
Meets targets
16
Luminance Uniformity Ratios
Around Seating Area = 2.6:1
Across Broad Viewing Areas = 1.5:1
Key results – energy savings
Documented
56%
TOTAL
ENERGY SAVINGS
Design Calculations and Installed Cost Estimates:
Standard Practice: 1.1w/ft2, 3-lamp T8 parabolic, 8’ x 10’ on center spacing, T8 Undercabinet task lights
Breakthrough: 0.48w/ft
0 48w/ft2, 1-lamp T8 indirect/direct pendant
pendant, 12’
12 on center spacing
spacing, 6W LED Undercabinet task lights
Page ƒ 42
Remember, know the costs for best practices
Lower Installed Cost
Design calculations and installed cost estimates
Standard Practice: 1.1w/ft2, 3-lamp T8 parabolic, 8’x10’ on center spacing, T8 Undercabinet task lights
Breakthrough: 0.48w/ft2, 1
1-lamp
lamp T8 indirect/direct pendant, 12’
12 on center spacing, 6W LED Undercabinet task lights
Page ƒ 43
Collaboration
Page ƒ 44
Project Vision
Page ƒ 45
Project Vision
Page ƒ 46
Project Vision
Page ƒ 47
Project Vision
Page ƒ 48
Project Vision
Page ƒ 49
Project Vision
Page ƒ 50
Project Vision
Page ƒ 51
Project Vision
Page ƒ 52
Project Vision
Page ƒ 53
Project Vision
Page ƒ 54
Project Vision
Page ƒ 55
Project Vision
Page ƒ 56
Collaboration
Page ƒ 57
Collaboration
Page ƒ 58
How did we do?
ƒ ASHRAE allowable Lighting
g
g Power Density
y 1.0 w/ft2
ƒ National Grid target 0.65
ƒ National Grid actual 0.54!
LEED CI awards:
1 point for 15% below ASHRAE
2 points for 25% below ASHRAE
3 points for 35% below ASHRAE
Page ƒ 59
How did we do?
ƒ LEED 2.2
2 2 Platinum Core and Shell
ƒ LEED 2.2 Platinum Corporate Interiors
Second single occupant tenant building in
the world to achieve this with energy use
40% b
below
l
ASHRAE 90
90.1
1
Page ƒ 60
Download