Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson - Design Automation Conference

advertisement
Dr. Bernard Meyerson
y
– IBM Fellow,, Vice President - Innovation,, IBM
Design
g Automation Conference 2010:
Echoes of DACs Past: From Prediction to
Realization and Watts Next?
Realization,
© 2010 IBM Corporation
First,, a trip
p down memory
y lane -
2
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
The Core Issue Then and Now; Power
As Classical Scaling
g Ends,, Innovation Accelerates
CPU
1
L2
Cache
Multi-Core
“Lower-Power” Multicore
14
CMOS
12
Bipolar
Power4
10
8
6 Junction
Transistor
4
Integrated
Circuit
Water
Cooling
?
2
Vacuum
tube
0
1950
IBM
360
1960
1970
1980
1990
Year of Announcement
3
SoC / eDRAM
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
2000
Inno
ovation R
Required
d
Module Heat Flu
M
ux (wattts/cm2)
CPU
2
2010
3D Integration
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Bets
ets Placed
aced Five
e Years
ea s Ago……….…
go
ƒ
Innovation drives future technology performance
– Blind scaling runs one (ran some) into thermal walls
ƒ
Processor design and metrics have changed irrevocably
– Gigahertz are gone, replaced by application specific metrics
ƒ
System solutions optimized via Holistic Design will ultimately dominate
progress in information technology
– Application specific computing revolutionizes computation costs
ƒ
Fiscal reality has driven and is driving our industry towards technological
consolidation
– Globalization of technology ecosystems is a result
4
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Holistic Design; Innovation at All Levels of Systems Stack
5
Clouds
ƒ Help improve Data Center efficiency
System
Management
ƒ Allow better asset utilization
Hybrid Systems
ƒ Enhance emerging workload consolidation
S
Security
it
ƒ Provide
P id ttrusted
t d computing
ti
10G Ethernet
ƒ Enable network fabric convergence
3D Integration
ƒ Revolutionize chip packaging
Fl h
Flash
ƒ Increase system performance and efficiency
Multi-core
Processors
ƒ Change hardware system design
Computational
Lithography
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
ƒ Extend CMOS density scaling
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Foundational Innovation; Materials
ƒ Elements Employed in Silicon Technology
Before 90’s
90 s
90’s through 2005
Beyond 2006
6
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
More of Moore? Not Quite (Don’t Get Comfortable)
The Drive for Density Continues, but NOT Linearly
ƒ Non-planar technology (FINFET) emerges
0.16 μm
P
PU PD
ƒ Smallest SRAM cell shown with optical lithography –
but based on FINFETs
– 0.063
0 063 μm2 cell with 80 nm gate pitch
– Cell show excellent functionality down to 0.4 V Vdd
– 40 nm fin pitch demonstrated for first time using
optical lithography
– IBM, GlobalFoundries, Toshiba, and NEC result
0.394
μm
SRAM
M cell size (μ m 2)
0.4
ITRS
Conference report
SRAM post fin etch
0.3
This work:0.063 μm2
(SIT-FinFET by ArF)
0.2
40nm fin pitch
0.1
0
45
35
25
15
Tech. Node (nm)
7
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
5
TEM of fins
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Meanwhile-The Search Goes on for A New Switch;
One Example - A Graphene RF Transistor
Single
Layer
Graphene
Gate length = 200 nm
Gate length = 150nm
fT = 10 GHz
ƒ fT ~ 26 GHz measured in a 150-nm-gate graphene transistor
ƒ The highest fT reported for graphene so far
8
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
Lin et al., Nano Letters 9, 422-426 (2009)
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Electrical Bandwidth Bottlenecks Emerge
Forcing Optics Innovation and Integration
•
Electrical Buses become increasingly difficult
at high data rates (physics):
•
10000
Optical Backplane: 10 GB/s, 62.5μm pitch
Increasing losses & cross-talk ; Frequency
resonant affects
Estimated Limit of MCM Electrical Escape BW
Optical data transmission:
•
Power Efficiency , much less lossy, not
plagued by resonant effects
BW
W (GB/s)
•
Off-card Bandwidth, GB/s
Limit of Electrical Backplane BW
1000
2015
2011
100
10
2 Core 2 Core 2 Core 2 Core 2 Core 4 Core 8 Core
16
Core
32
Core
System or Time
Rack
p
Backplane
Card
Module
μP
OPTICS
μP
MULTI CHIP MODULE
CIRCUIT BOARD
9
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Packaging Innovation Enabling
3D Integration of Logic, Memory and Optics
ƒ
3D Integration allows restructuring of the compute node to leverage dense memory and
dramatically increase memory bandwidth
ƒ
This produces significant performance improvements with necessary software coevolution/adaptation
p
ƒ Optics: Multi-cores
Multi cores require huge bandwidth,
bandwidth but the cost of
optics is dropping rapidly, allowing Optics to move inside the
system: rack to card to chip
ptical tr
affic
al I/O
On-chip
o
Off-ch
ip
Optiic
optica
ls
ignals
ƒ CMOS integrated silicon photonics can provide large power
savings for on-chip interconnects
Photonic Plane
Memory Plane
Logic Plane
ƒ Logic plane
ƒ Memory plane
ƒ Photonic plane
10
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
~300 cores
~30GB eDRAM
On-Chip Optical Network
>1Tbps optical on-chip
>1Tbps optical off-chip
© 2010 IBM Corporation
I Could Follow This Thread For Several
M
More
Hours,
H
B
Butt That
Th t Would
W ld Be;
B
DEATH BY POWERPOINT
So Instead, Visit One’s CFO to Explain…
© 2010 IBM Corporation
The Impact of Physics on Finances
DEATH BY CFO
© 2010 IBM Corporation
All This Innovation Did Not Come Cheap!
ƒ Extraordinarily complex and costly solutions have emerged to address;
–Lithography (Multiple exposure, EUV,……..)
–Transistors (FinFet’s, Graphene, ……)
–Interconnects
Interconnects (3D/Stacking
(3D/Stacking, Optical
Optical,…))
–Manufacturing (32nm->22nm fabs)
EUV at
Albany Nanotech
13
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Was/Is There a Sustainable Business Model?
Chip Making R&D Versus Revenues
6
10
ƒ The industry trend as of today: R&D
Expenses
p
far outpace
p
revenues
2004-2020 Projected CAGR
With
VLSI inc.
(Worldwide
in Permission,
$M)
~$2.3B
5
10
Estimated
cost to develop the
4
1022-nm CMOS logic process
1,800
3
10
2
1,400
,
R&D ~ 12
12.2%
2%
$1.1B
10
Process development
Revenue
Growth
6.5%
2004 - 2010 CAGR
ƒ This was NOT sustainable
1,000
Process ramp-up
1
10
0
800
10
70
600
60
400
50
Revenu
ue/RD&E
R&D
Expenses
12.2%
Costs ($M)
C
1,200
Total RD & E (Chip + Eq)
Semiconductor Revenues
extrapolate
ed
1,600
Revenues ~ 6.5%
200 40
ƒ Fiscal reality drove our industry to
0
consolidate around Innovation
30
180nm 130nm
90nm
65nm
45nm
32nm
22nm
Networks.
Source: IBS Global
20 System IC Service Management Report, April 2006.
ƒ The predicted consolidation
continues virtually unabated.
unabated
14
Dr. Bernard
Meyerson
Dr.S.Bernard
S. Meyerson
10
0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Year
Source: VLSI Research inc.
© 2008 IBM Corporation
Semiconductor Technology Globalization
Intel
AMAT
GF
Freescale
SEMATECH
R&H
IBM
IMEC
Infineon
GF
STM
TNS
Hitachi TEL
NEC
ToshibaSamsung
Sony JV
Toppan
SELETE
TSMC
GF(Chartered)
Equipment and Materials Partners with IBM
IBM Partners
CEA-LETI Partners
Major Consortia-IMEC&SEMATECH
15
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Emergent-Silicon Valley East; The Hudson Valley
Emergent2005--2008
2005
Yorktown Research
Filtering New Materials & Processes
Albany R&D
32 nm node and beyond Process & Tool R&D
Process Window / Manufacturing Scaling / Learning Rates
Early Defective & Yield Assessment
New metrology/characterization methods
Production
Scaling-Fishkill
IBM
Partners
16
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
Materials &
Equipment
Suppliers
Matheson Tri Gas
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Albany NanoTech Evolves to be a Full Flow Fabricator
2005
Panoramic and aerial views of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE) facilities, which houses the Center for Semiconductor
Research (CSR) Line where IBM is performing 22nm advanced semiconductor research and development
2009
NanoFab
South
Annex
(NFX)
NanoFab
North
(NFN)
NanoFab
N
F b
East
(NFE)
NanoFab
S th
South
(NFS)
17
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
An Ecosystem Grows Based Upon Radical Collaboration
2009--……….
2009
Design IP
Advanced Research
Design Tools
Manufacturing
Platform
NYS
Partnerships
CCIC
Manufacturing
Design
Services
Design Tools
Ecosystem
SOI &
Bulk CMOS Joint
Process Development
Alliances
Tools & Materials
IP Solutions
Computational
Scaling
Matheson
Exploratory Research
Library Solutions
Packaging Joint Development
De elopment
NRI
18
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
The New Paradigm; Radical Collaboration as Taught at HBS
Science-Based Business and
the Business of Science
19
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Acknowledging A Discontinuity;
Information Technology
gy Reinvents Metrics
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Systems and Technology Group
A Prime IBM
Example
Of How Metrics Have Evolved;
The Clock Race Terminates
Where have all the “Giga Hertz” gone?
21
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
New Metrics for Processors
•Compute
Compute capacity in a given System implementation
•Application Adaptive Multicore designs
y
y address throughput
g p and/or thread p
performance apps
pp
•Dynamically
•Autonomic energy efficiency & management capabilities
•Advanced enablement of platform and systems management
•Virtual Server Placement
•Image Management
•Storage/Network Integration
The Bottom Line;; We Must Now Focus On Solutions
<<< Solution >>>
process of solving
gap
problem
The action or p
22
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Application Specific
Problem Solving”
Solving
“Problem
Stream Computing:
A paradigm
di
for
f handling
h dli
the flood of data
© 2010 IBM Corporation
What Flood?
By 2011, the world will store 10X the Data stored in 2006, BUT;
1,800
1,600
10x
growth
th in
i Data
D t
over five years
Exabytes
s
1,400
RFID
RFID,
1 200
1,200
Digital TV,
1,000
MP3 players,
Digital cameras,
800
Camera phones, VoIP,
Medical imaging, Laptops,
600
smart meters, multi-player games,
400
Satellite images, GPS, ATMs, Scanners,
Sensors Digital radio,
Sensors,
radio DLP theaters,
theaters Telematics ,
Peer-to-peer, Email, Instant messaging, Videoconferencing,
CAD/CAM, Toys, Industrial machines, Security systems, Appliances
200
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
I
Internet
connected
d devices
d i
will
ill grow by
b 2000X,
2000X from
f
500M to 1 T
Trillion,
illi
and each will demand that someone “listen”.
24
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
An Application Specific Solution
Stream Computing, aka How not to drown in data
A new paradigm for ultra low latency and high throughput in-motion
in motion analytics
Continuous Ingestion
25
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
Continuous Queries /Analytics on data in motion
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Streams Processing Building Blocks
Transform
NYSE
Dynamic
P/E Ratio
Calculation
Milllions of Eve
ents
VWAP
Calculation
SEC Edgar
10 Q
Earnings
Extraction
Caption
Caption
Extraction
Caption
Extraction
Extraction
Video News
Video News
Video News
Weather Data
Speech
Speech
Recognition
ecog
to
Speech
Recognition
Recognition
Hurricane
Weather
Data
Extraction
Filter
Annotate
Correlate
Join P/E
with
Aggregate
Impact
Earnings
Moving
Average
Calculation
Topic
Topic
Filtration
Topic
Filtration
Filtration
Earnings
Earnings
Related
Earnings
Related
News
Related
News
Analysis
News
Analysis
Anal sis
Analysis
Hurricane
Forecast
Hurricane
Model
1
Forecast
Hurricane
Model
2
Forecast
Hurricane
Model
…
Forecast
Model N
Earnings
News
Join
Hurricane
Risk
Encoder
Trade
Decision
Hurricane
Impact
Hurricane
Industry
Impact
Classify
< 1 millisecond latency
26
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
TD Bank
Building a next generation trading platform
ƒ Identify and execute trades
ƒ Process over 5M events per second
with average latency of 150
microseconds
ƒ Expand to incorporate content
feeds, news text, audio, video, to
establish greater context for better
decisions
CIO TD Bank
B k "TD Bank
B k Financial
Fi
i l Group
G
worked
k d with
ith IBM R
Research
h tto d
develop
l a first-of-a-kind
fi t f ki d
architecture capable of consuming, analyzing and acting on real-time market data while maintaining
sub-millisecond response times even under extreme data loads”
27
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Life-Changing When Applied in Medicine
University
y of Ontario Institute of Technology
gy
A Research Project to monitor premature infants in the ICU
ƒ Correlating blood oxygenation
with blood pressure to predict
“Baby crashing”
ƒ Nosocomial
N
i l IInfection
f ti
Prediction
–Monitoring heart rate
variability with other
information to predict
sepsis
–Alarms
Alarms up to 24 hours
earlier than by
experienced ICU Nurses
Sources
On-the-fly stream computing
InfoSphere Streams
Files, TCP
Sockets
Persist/Enrich
solidDB
Persist
stream data
ODBC/JDBC/SA
solidDB, DB2, IDS
InfoSphere
Warehouse
http://www.youtube.com/ibmhealthcare
//
/
28
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Cloud Computing;
Solutions on a Global Scale
© 2010 IBM Corporation
IBM Systems and Technology Group
Why Not Stay With What We Know?
Spending
(US$B)
Installed Base
(M Units)
Worldwide IT Spending Trend
$300
$250
Power and cooling costs
50
Server mgmt and admin costs
45
New server spending
40
35
$200
30
$150
25
20
$100
15
10
$50
5
$0
10
08
09
20
20
20
07
20
06
20
05
20
03
04
20
02
00
01
20
20
20
20
98
99
19
19
97
19
19
96
0
We cannot continue our past strategy;
ƒ
Server management costs dwarf
all others
ƒ
Datacenter power demands are
growing at unsustainable rates
– 1.2% of global electrical output
is used by servers and related
cooling equipment
– Spending on datacenter power
is growing 600
600-800%
800% faster
than spending on servers.
Source: IDC, Virtualization 2.0: The Next Phase in Customer Adoption, Doc #204904, Dec 2006
30
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Economy
y of Scale is Driving
g IT From Left to Right
g
Complex
p
Physical
Consolidation
Logical
Simplification
Service Managed
Data Centers
Windows Servers
Windows Server
Firewalls,
Unix Servers
Virtual Servers,
Storage, Networks
Assets
Routers
Unix Server
Switches
Networks
Virtualization
Management
Assets
Assets
Servers
Linux Server
Linux Servers
Storage
Storage
Servers
Storage
Assets
Networks
Build It Yourself
Requirements
• Lower management costs
• Reduced time to deploy applications, including self-service
• Higher availability, security, energy efficiency, resource utilization
• Service managed infrastructure
31
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
Grouping of like systems
Complexity hiding
Self-service to resources, applications
Request driven provisioning
Automated application on-boarding
Appliances
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Applying Cloud
Computing to the EDA
Industry
32
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Exponential Growth of Transistors But Not of Designers
W Must
We
M t Make
M k This
Thi Process
P
“Easier”
“E i ”
1.8
10,000
1.4
1.2
1
1,000
0.8
0.6
0.4
Power uP Transisto
P
ors M
Designers (u
uP Design) rel. units
1.6
Designers
Designers/Transistor
Transistors
0.2
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
11
20
10
20
09
20
08
20
07
20
06
20
05
04
20
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
20
19
19
33
99
100
98
0
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Compounding the Challenge, Design Issues are Ever More Complex,
Even in This Back-level
Back level Assessment!
Functionality + Testability
Thousands
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay
F
Functionality
ti
lit + Testability
T t bilit + Wire
Wi Delay
D l + Power
P
Mgmt
M t
# Transistors
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software +
g
Integrity
g y
Signal
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software +
Signal Integrity + Hybrid Chips
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software +
Signal Integrity + Hybrid Chips + RF
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software +
Signal Integrity + Hybrid Chips + RF + Packaging
Billions
Functionality + Testability + Wire Delay + Power Mgmt + Embedded Software +
Signal Integrity + Hybrid Chips + RF + Packaging + Mgmt of Physical Limits
•Exponentially growing number of elements
•Design
D i complexity
l it is
i exponential
ti l function
f
ti off element
l
t countt
Source: Semiconductor Research
Corporation
34
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Cloud Computing Solutions Are Highly Tuned To Workloads
– Flexible,
Fl ibl configurable
fi
bl cloud
l d off virtualized
i t li d iimages
1-1000 Servers
• Ease of management and cost reduction of many
different system images.
***
***
• W
Workloads
kl d & A
Application
li ti D
Development
l
t&T
Testt
systems
Cloud Burst
Many Different Images
• Dynamic, user configurable systems – e.g.
Amazon EC2,, IBM Cloud Burst,…….
,
– Cloud of highly utilized common systems for
batch intensive workloads and priority interactive
jobs
• Ease of management and cost reduction of
compute intensive workloads.
• Workloads & Applications
Batch jobs of Engineering applications
Interactive jobs with same image
• Maniacally eliminate computational overhead
to increase utilization.
• Lower cost per node
35
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
10-100,000 Servers
***
Few Images
***
Design Cloud
© 2010 IBM Corporation
IBM Design Cloud History and Roadmap
ƒ IBM has been using a design cloud/grid for more than 20 years.
– Begun in the late ‘80s as a grid of servers and PC’s doing logic simulation/verification.
– In 2Q of 2009 all designers were using the design cloud.
ƒ Today
– All IBM chips are designed in the cloud
– IBM Design Cloud
• 20,000+ Cores, 150+ TB RAM, 1+ PB Disk in production across 3000+ Users
• 40K+ Jobs/day, 50M+ Sim cycles (processor clocks)
– Global EDA Cloud infrastructure and user community
– Tool sets;
• Logic design, Circuit design, Layout, Verification, IBM EDA tools, Vendor tools
ƒ 22nm designs have launched on the Design Cloud.
C
– Infrastructure upgraded to handle larger chips/transistor counts.
– Collaboration with Mentor to minimize OPC runtimes.
• 32nm OPC uses a Roadrunner Supercomputer.
36
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Design Cloud Delivery Management System
Batch (90%)
Interactive (10%)
ƒ Optimized for high-utilization
high utilization through a balance of batch
and realtime jobs
Cloud
ƒAchieves 80-90% CPU utilization / 60% memory utilization.
g Cloud was enabled by
y the ability
y to support
pp remote high
g
ƒThe Global Design
resolution graphics
ƒInteractive user jobs run at maximum priority for designer efficiency
–Over 3000 demanding Design Cloud users
•Interactive
I t
ti jobs
j b are performance
f
critical
iti l tto maintain
i t i user acceptance.
t
ƒUnique computing Resources are deployed for maximum efficiency
–OPC mask preparation requires a high-performance supercomputer
–Logic simulation for virtual Bring-up and Power-on requires a massive
FPGA system.
–Must support varied computer architectures and operating systems
•Today – Power, x86, SUN, Roadrunner and AWAN(FPGA)
37
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Data Wins; High Utilization is Consistently Achieved
High utilization (~ 90% steady state) for 48 hours while
handling both batch and interactive jobs simultaneously
38
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
The (New) Bottom Line
• Innovation Drives Performance, Period.
• There are no magic bullets left, just a lot of hard work.
• System, not chip performance, is the new metric
• A focus on enabling Solutions is emerging; e.g. Stream
p
g, Application-Specific
pp
p
Acceleration,, Appliances,………
pp
,
Computing,
• Cloud computing is emergent as a class of Solution as
applied to EDA
• EDA Clouds have proven track records in supporting
demanding users on a global scale.
• Economy of scale, agile and adaptive capacity, and the
conversion from Capex to Opex all favor this trend.
• The transformation of this industry is still accelerating
39
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Backup
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Scaling streams using cloud computing - from a single instance to thousands
VWAP
Timeperiod
NYSE
Calculate P/E
Ratio
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
Deployment
on on the
Deployment
High Performance
Cluster
Cloud
News
Join P/E and
Aggregate
Impact
Semi
Annual
Moving
Average
SEC Edgar
Keyword
Filter
Gister
RSS Parser
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
Hurricane
Forecast
Hurricane
Impact
Hurricane
Industry
Impact
Weather Data
VWAP
Timeperiod
NYSE
Calculate P/E
Ratio
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
News
Join P/E and
Aggregate
Impact
Semi
Annual
Moving
Average
SEC Edgar
Keyword
Filter
Gister
RSS Parser
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
Hurricane
Forecast
Hurricane
Impact
Trade Decision
Hurricane
Industry
Impact
Weather Data
VWAP
Timeperiod
NYSE
Calculate P/E
Ratio
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
Semi
Annual
Moving
Average
SEC Edgar
News
Keyword
Filter
Gister
RSS Parser
RSS Parser
Keyword
Filter
Hurricane
u ca e
Forecast
Hurricane
u ca e
Impact
Join P/E and
Aggregate
Impact
Hurricane
Industry
Impact
Weather Data
41
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
The Cloud over the years
Network-Delivered
Network Delivered Services are the culmination of a long term trend to simplify the purchase of IT
Services
1961: John McCarthy proposes computing as a utility
1961: IBM Services Bureau
1975: First inter
industry EDI standards
inter-industry
1981: SMTP defines the standard electronic mail service
1985: United Nations sponsors EDIFACT
1990: Berners-Lee invents the World-Wide Web
1994: CommerceNet
1998: RosettaNet
1999: i-Mode mobile internet
2000: IBM BCRS
2000: UDDI 1.0; “SaaS”
SaaS coined
2001: Dot com bubble bursts
IBM Service
Bureau (1961)
2005: IBM AoD
2006: Amazon EC2
2007: Google Health; force.com launch
2008: IBM ww Cloud Computing
centers
19601970
42
1980
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
1990
2000
2010
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Innovation Across Novel Materials, Structures, Processes,
and
d Architecture
A hit t
Continues
C ti
…
Airgap
eDRAM
3D Chip
Stacking
High-k
Frozen
SiGe Chip
Immersion
Dual Core
SOI
Strained
Silicon
Slowing
Speed
p
of
Self
Light
Assembly
Copper
Atomic
p
Manipulation
Nanotube
IC
Atomic
Molecular Storage
Processing
Nanophotonic
S itch
Switch
Highest
Resolution
Carbon
Nanotube STEM
Transistors
Nobel Prize, STM
43
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Application Specific Computing Within a Cloud
More ways to skin a compute intensive cat;
System X (dx360 M3) – Server w/embedded GPU Configuration
Announced – May 18, 2010
4- 2.5” SS SAS 6Gbps
(or SATA, or 3.5”, or SSD…)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 #2
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 #1
(or NVIDIA Quadro FX3800, or Fusion IO, or…)
( NVIDIA T
(or
Tesla
l M1060
M1060,or FX3800
FX3800, or Fusion
F i IO,
IO or))
Server level value
44
ƒ
Each server
ser er is individually
indi id all serviceable
ser iceable
ƒ
Each GPU is individually replaceable
ƒ
6Gbps SAS drives and controller for maximum performance
ƒ
Service and support for server and GPU from IBM
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
Infiniband DDR
(or QDR, or 10GbE…)
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Design Cloud Criteria for Success
ƒ Extremely high server utilization
–minimize cost while maintaining high performance globally
ƒ Simplified maintenance and scalability
–Servers and storage co-located for ease of scaling.
–Revision
Revision control readily effected with no shadowing to remote locations.
ƒ High security, availability and reliability
–Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo designs were done in the Design Cloud.
–When
When a servers goes down all batch jobs are restarted
restarted.
–Interactive jobs do not lose data given uniform backup policies.
ƒ Efficient use of design licenses.
–Designers from around the world use the licenses on a pool of servers.
ƒ High resolution graphics must be accessible globally.
–Improves
p
designer
g
p
productivity.
y
45
Dr. Bernard S. Meyerson
© 2010 IBM Corporation
Download