STATUS OF DRY AMD MANAGEMENT

advertisement
RETINA
MODERN RETINA
STATUS OF DRY AMD
MANAGEMENT
Risk management in patients with early dry AMD includes nutritional
supplementation. Researchers seek to understand the pathogenesis of AMD in order
to develop treatment options.
BY DEREK N. CUNNINGHAM, OD, AND ALAN FRANKLIN, MD, PhD
The nonexudative, or dry,
form of age-related macular
degeneration (AMD) is characterized by progressive macular changes that can lead to
significant visual impairment.
In 2004, it was estimated
that 7.3 million people in the
United States were considered to have high-risk features of
dry AMD in one or both eyes.1 The primary risk factors for
developing AMD include advanced age, female sex, lighter
skin pigmentation, cigarette smoking, low dietary intake of
antioxidants, and multiple genetic factors.
AMD accounts for approximately 46% of cases of severe
visual loss (visual acuity of 20/200 or worse) in the United
States.2 Although dry AMD accounts for approximately 80%
of all cases of AMD, it is responsible for only approximately
10% of the cases with severe visual loss; the other cases are
attributable to exudative, or wet, AMD.3
Dry AMD has multiple clinical features, including drusen,
alterations in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) resulting in hyper- or hypopigmentation of the macula, and RPE
atrophy. The most frequently used classification system for
dry AMD, described in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study
(AREDS),4 includes four categories.
• Category 1: No AMD (Figure 1), characterized by no or
few small drusen (< 63 µm);
• Category 2: Early AMD (Figure 2), characterized by
multiple small drusen, few intermediate drusen
(63-124 µm), or mild RPE abnormalities;
• Category 3: Intermediate AMD, characterized by
multiple intermediate drusen, at least one large druse
(>124 µm), or geographic atrophy (GA) not involving
the center of the fovea; and
• Category 4: Advanced AMD (Figure 3), characterized by
GA involving the foveal center.
18 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | SEPTEMBER 2015
Figure 1. Category 1 dry AMD.
A
Figure 2. Category 2 dry AMD.
B
C
Figure 3. Category 4 AMD (A); FA (B) and OCT (C).
RETINA
RESEARCH: DRY AMD PIPELINE
Recent advances in the understanding of geographic atrophy
(GA) have led to numerous ongoing clinical trials targeting different molecules shown to be associated with the underlying
disease pathophysiology. Most disease processes that include
age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have common pathophysiologic themes that include altered immune status, immune
dysregulation, oxidative damage, and increased apoptosis. Current
molecules under investigation aim to inhibit GA progression by a
variety of mechanisms including reducing toxic byproduct generation and accumulation, slowing the visual cycle, and inhibiting the
complement pathway, which has been shown to be involved in
the pathogenesis of AMD.
The products of oxidative stress trigger a chronic low-grade
inflammation (pathophysiological parainflammation) process in
AMD patients. In early AMD, soft drusen contain many mediators
of chronic low-grade inflammation such as C-reactive protein,
adducts of the carboxyethylpyrrole protein, immunoglobulins,
and acute-phase molecules, as well as the complement-related
proteins C3a, C5a, C5, C5b-9, complement factor H (CFH), CD35,
and CD46.1 Inappropriate activation of the complement system,
mainly the alternative pathway, mediates chronic autologous
pathophysiological parainflammation in dry and exudative AMD.
CFH, which functions to inactivate the alternate complement
pathway, has been found to harbor potential loss of function in
genetic alterations associated with both complement activation
and dry AMD progression. In addition, cigarette smoking decreases CFH function thereby exacerbating dry AMD progression and
chronic inflammation mediated by C-reactive protein.
There are multiple clinical trials now enrolling for various inhibitors of the alternate complement pathway, such as lampalizumab,
and APL-2.2 Visual cycle end products have been shown to accumulate in the subretinal and subretinal pigment epithelium (RPE)
space, which ultimately act as a barrier between RPE and photoreceptor molecular chaperoning and transfer. Therefore, some visual
cycle inhibitors (eg, emixustat) are undergoing testing to slow the
progression of dry AMD.3 Dicer enzyme deficiency leads to inappropriate accumulation of Alu RNA, which over time becomes
toxic to the RPE.4
In AREDS, at 10 years, progression from either category
1 or 2 to high-risk disease (ie, category 3) occurred in only
15% of patients.5 However, patients with intermediate AMD
were at much higher risk of disease progression and vision
loss. Further, patients with advanced AMD in one eye are at
high risk of developing advanced disease in the fellow eye at
5 years (35%-50%).6
Contemporary treatment recommendations for dry AMD
are based on the results of the AREDS and AREDS2 studies.5-7 AREDS demonstrated a significant benefit from the
More recently, the HIV reverse transcriptase drugs, NRTIs, have
been shown to reduce Alu RNA, thereby demonstrating that
some NRTIs may be a good candidate treatment for AMD progression.5
There is also supporting research that the involvement of Rhoassociated kinase (ROCK) has also been indicated as a key factor
in the progression of AMD.6 ROCK involvement suggests ageinduced innate immune imbalance as an underlying AMD pathogenesis, which may open up new possibilities for more effective
AMD treatment by targeting macrophage plasticity. Oxidative
stress has also been shown as an important mediator of dry AMD
progression. Current nutriceutical formulations have shown some
benefit, and there are more potent antioxidant compounds
currently under development for the treatment of dry AMD.
Microglial activation can injure photoreceptor cells and lead to
the development of dry AMD.
For a disease that is so prevalent in eye care, there is still a considerable amount of speculation as to the specific nature and
pathogenesis of AMD. Although many novel compounds are in
clinical trials, and other established molecules may be found to have
a new indication as effective treatments for both dry and wet AMD
progression, there are no approved pharmacologic treatments for
dry AMD. There is research pointing to seemingly endless potential
avenues for treatment, but let’s take a look at what we know for
now. The number of promising and diverse treatments for AMD
progression are certainly encouraging, and over the next 5 years will
likely lead to a quantum improvement in our ability to treat this
common and visually threatening disease.
1. Nita M, Grzybowski A, Ascaso FJ, Huerva V, et al. Age-related macular degeneration in the aspect of chronic
low-grade inflammation (pathophysiological parainflammation). Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:930671. doi:
10.1155/2014/930671.
2. Rhoades W, Dickson D, Do DV et al. Potential role of lampalizumab for treatment of geographic atrophy. Clin
Ophthalmol. 2015;11;9:1049-1956. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S59725. eCollection 2015. Review. Erratum in: Clin Ophthalmol.
2015;9:1135.
3. Dugel PU, Novack RL, Csaky KG, et al. Phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, 90-day study of emixustat hydrochloride in geographic atrophy associated with dry age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2015;35(6):1173-1183.
4. Kaneko H, Dridi S, Tarallo V, Gelfand BD, et al. DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular
degeneration. Nature. 2011;471(7338):325-330.
5. Fowler BJ, Gelfand BD, Kim Y, et al. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors possess intrinsic anti-inflammatory
activity. Science. 2014:21;346(6212):1000-1003.
6. Zandi S, Nakao S, Chun KH, et al. ROCK-isoform-specific polarization of macrophages associated with agerelated macular degeneration. Cell Rep. 2015;10(7):1173-1186.
combination antioxidant vitamins (vitamin A, C, and E) and
zinc, resulting in a 34% reduction of the risk of developing
advanced AMD (ie, category 4) over a median of 6.3 years of
follow-up in persons at high risk of developing advanced AMD
(category 3).4 The authors concluded that patients with extensive intermediate size drusen, at least one large druse, noncentral GA in one or both eyes, or advanced AMD or vision loss
due to AMD in one eye, and without contraindications, should
consider taking a supplement of antioxidants plus zinc.
The AREDS2 study was designed to determine whether
SEPTEMBER 2015 | ADVANCED OCULAR CARE 19
RETINA
adding lutein plus zeaxanthin, docosahexaenoic acid plus
eicosapentaenoic acid, or both to the original AREDS formulation decreases the risk of developing advanced AMD and to
evaluate the effect of eliminating beta-carotene, lowering zinc
doses, or both in the AREDS formulation.7 The study’s results
demonstrated that addition of lutein plus zeaxanthin, docosahexaenoic acid plus eicosapentaenoic acid, or both to the
AREDS formulation did not further reduce risk of progression
to advanced AMD. Because of potential increased incidence of
lung cancer in former smokers, lutein plus zeaxanthin could be
an appropriate carotenoid substitute in the formulation.7
A post-hoc analysis of the AREDS has suggested that AMD
patients with certain genotypes, as determined by genetic testing for AMD risk alleles, may derive greater benefit from specific
supplements (antioxidants alone, zinc alone), but these data
have been disputed, and the conclusions from these post-hoc
analyses have not as of yet been supported by additional statistical analysis or replicated with a prospective study.8-10
At present, the most evidence-based, cost-efficient, and
practical approach to management of dry AMD seems to be
to recommend AREDS2 vitamins to all high-risk dry AMD
patients and to defer genetic testing until prospective studies
support an alternative approach. This approach is consistent
with the recommendations of the American Academy of
Ophthalmology.
GOAL OF MANAGEMENT
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a useful tool in
the diagnosis and management of patients with dry AMD.
OCT imaging allows the identification and characterization
of drusen and GA and provides quantitative information
about the disease state and its progression. OCT can also
detect subtle changes resulting from wet AMD, such as a
fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment or shallow
subretinal fluid that may be difficult to appreciate on clinical
examination alone (Figure 3C).w
Significant vision loss related to dry AMD is typically the
result of GA. In contrast to wet AMD, there is no effective
treatment to halt or reverse vision loss in patients affected by
GA. Additionally, GA can result in progressive vision loss in
patients with concomitant wet AMD who are being treated
with antivascular endothelial growth factor injections.
Recent advances in the understanding of GA have led to
numerous ongoing clinical trials targeting different molecules
shown to be associated with the underlying disease pathophysiology (see Research: Dry AMD Pipeline). Molecules under investigation aim to inhibit GA progression by a variety of mechanisms including reducing the generation and accumulation of
toxic byproducts, slowing the visual cycle, and inhibiting the
complement pathway, which has been shown to be involved in
the pathogenesis of AMD.
The goal of managing patients with dry AMD is to slow progression of the disease with AREDS supplementation and to
20 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | SEPTEMBER 2015
promptly identify patients progressing to wet AMD, allowing
early and more effective treatment of the exudative disease.
All dry AMD patients should be instructed on the appropriate
use of an Amsler grid and should monitor their vision daily.
Recently, an alternative home visual field monitoring
device to detect metamorphopsia, the ForeseeHome AMD
Monitoring Program (Notal Vision Inc.), was described.11 The
system has been demonstrated to provide earlier detection
of choroidal neovascularization development, increasing the
likelihood of better visual acuity results with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy.11 This device will
likely gain more widespread use and will be a consideration
for monitoring dry AMD patients.
When progression to wet AMD is detected, patients
should be evaluated and treated by a retina specialist, preferably within 1 to 2 weeks. Retina evaluation should be strongly considered in the absence of definitive exudative disease
in patients with new or progressive metamorphopsia, an
unexplained decrease in visual acuity, or new or progressive
GA that may meet inclusion criteria for one of the numerous
ongoing clinical trials. n
1. Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol.
2004;122(4):564-572.
2. Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch
Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):477-485.
3. Ferris FL 3rd, Fine SL, Hyman L. Age-related macular degeneration and blindness due to neovascular maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(11):1640-1642.
4. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with
vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS Report No. 8. Arch Ophthalmol.
2001;119(10):1417-1436.
5. Chew EY, Clemons TE, Agron E, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Research Group. Ten-year follow-up of agerelated macular degeneration in the age-related eye disease study: AREDS report no. 36. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(3):272-277.
6. Ferris FL, Davis MD, Clemons TE, et al. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Research Group. A simplified severity scale for
age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(11):1570-1574.
7. Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group. Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2005-2015.
8. Awh CC, Hawken S, Zanke BW. Treatment response to antioxidants and zinc based on CFHand ARMS2 genetic risk allele number in
the Age-Related Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):162-169.
9. Chew EY, Klein ML, Clemons TE, Agrón E, Abecasis GR. Genetic testing in persons with age-related macular degeneration and the
use of the AREDS supplements: to test or not to test? Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):212-215.
10. Wittes J, Musch DC. Should we test for genotype in deciding on age-related eye disease study supplementation? Ophthalmology.
2015;122(1):3-5.
11. AREDS2-HOME Study Research Group, Chew EY, Clemons TE, Bressler SB, et al. Randomized trial of a home monitoring
system for early detection of choroidal neovascularization home monitoring of the Eye (HOME) study. Ophthalmology.
2014;121(2):535-544.
Section Editor Derek N. Cunningham, OD
Director of optometry and research at Dell Laser Consultants
in Austin, Texas
n Founding member and chair of the American Society of
Cataract and Refractive Surgery’s Integrated Ophthalmic
Managed Eyecare Delivery Task Force
n Chief medical editor of Advanced Ocular Care
n dcunningham@dellvision.com
n Financial interest: none acknowledged
n
Medical Editor Alan Franklin, MD, PhD
Practices at the Retina Specialty Institute in Mobile, Alabama
afranklin@retinaspecialty.com
n Financial interest: none acknowledged
n
n
Download