Cleaning House
Broker Forums
Selling Tips
Training & Certification
Legal & Compliance
Regulatory
Marketing
Career
Leisure
Mutual Funds
Equities
Fixed Income
Alternative Investments
Money Managers
Annuities & Insurance
Estate Planning
Tax Strategies
Retirement Planning
College Planning
Options Corner
from CBOE
Trust & Estates
National Real Estate
Investor
Sponsored Links
Buy a Sponsored Link
Now.
Start driving targeted
traffic to your site with
Sprinks.
List Your Site Here!
Cleaning House
Search
By Dave Sterman
Registered Rep., Apr 1, 2002
Print-friendly format
E-mail this information
Will Enron prove to be the last straw?
Investors have been clamoring for Wall Street to clean up its act for decades. And
the cataclysmic demise of what was the nation's seventh-largest company (in terms
of sales) has many hoping that 2002 will be the year of reform.
Seizing on the current Zeitgeist, various parties are weighing in with ideas on how
to straighten out the mess and rebuild investor confidence. Will their concerns lead
to genuine reform of the conflict-cursed accounting profession?
In March, SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt kicked off a series of hearings that could
eventually lead to a new set of industry regulations. He called for an oversight
committee that monitors the accounting profession — a move that überinvestor
Warren Buffett applauds. Buffett said auditors are too easily swayed by their clients.
“They've got to be more scared of [the shareholder] than the client,” he said.
The SEC would also like to shorten the time a company has to file financial
statements. With accounting software now able to compile numbers with lightning
speed, critics question why companies spend weeks preparing official results. In
addition, the SEC would like to compel companies to publicly disclose “critical
accounting policies” that shed light on the judgments made by executives and
accountants.
SEC Director of Enforcement Stephen Cutler would also like to find a way to bar
unfit executives from holding top jobs in publicly traded companies. And Cutler
wants to see federal prosecutors join the SEC in its investigations, which could lead
to more execs serving jail time.
How much more the SEC can do remains a question since the General Accounting
Office said in March that the agency is already short of resources. To satisfy the
voters back home, Congress is also giving Wall Street the once over. Enron-related
hearings are looking at how Wall Street analysts rate stocks while their investment
banking colleagues are trying to solicit business. (See “Hardball with Sen. Jim
Bunning” on page 28.) A few have even suggested that banks be forced to choose
whether to analyze or finance a particular company — not do both. “The Chinese
Wall hasn't worked,” says Joseph Whall, who heads up The Whall Group, a Michiganbased forensic accounting firm.
Missouri Sen. Jean Carnahan has already introduced a new bill, The Fully Informed
Investor Act, which calls for shortening the time in which insiders need to file after
buying or selling stock. The legislation would require the company to file the
information by the end of the day that the transaction was made, and the SEC
would be required to release the information online that same day. Jonathan
Moreland, director of research at InsiderInsights.com, notes that the SEC's Pitt has
sent Carnahan a letter expressing support for the bill. “Hopefully, his backing will
force Congress to adopt the measure,” he says, but adds that Sen. Carnahan needs
http://www.registeredrep.com/ar/finance_cleaning_house (1 of 2)11/13/2003 6:31:03 AM
●
Magazine Subscriptions
●
Email Newsletter
●
Advertiser Information
Cleaning House
a co-sponsor to help push the legislation.
Nevertheless, it's an open question whether Congress will enact new legislation.
Wall Street lobbyists are a quite powerful force on Capitol Hill and have a history of
blocking change. After all, it took 17 years to overcome resistance to a rewrite of
securities laws that ended Depression-era Glass-Steagall limits on banks. “It's not
clear that everything Congress raises will ever come to pass,” Pitt says.
Whall is a bit more optimistic. “We'll see something everyone can brag about by the
end of the year,” he says. But, he says, simply writing new laws isn't enough. “We
need congressional mandates that will be enforced.”
Self Regulation
The accountants are also trying to reform themselves in a bid to stave off regulatory
action. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) hopes to have new regs in
place by July. One proposal: limit a company's ability to hide debt obligations.
Presently, a company needs to find a partner willing to own just 3 percent of a
separate entity that will control an asset (or a liability) that can then exist off of the
balance sheet. FASB wants to raise that figure to only 10 percent, which would not
have a major impact on the “special purpose entity” abuses.
And the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR), which
certifies CFAs, is calling on analysts to step up the quality of their work. In a fullpage Wall Street Journal ad, AIMR implored analysts to “ferret out information
contained in the primary financial statements — and adjust valuations accordingly.”
Merrill Lynch's research department has already heeded that call. Deepak Raj,
director of equity research, issued a memo that called for analysts to dig past
company-issued “pro-forma” numbers. Analysts, he said, should look more closely
at other measures such as pension plan funding, off-balance sheet entities and
asset measures such as inventory turnover.
Companies are also doing their part. General Electric and IBM have already fattened
their annual reports with more detail. “The 10-Ks are going to make interesting
reading,” says Rick Roberts, a Deutsche Bank institutional broker.
Companies are also looking to improve board-level oversight. Advertising giant
Interpublic Group, for example, recently booted four executives off its board and
replaced them with outsiders.
In a year, the financial landscape could be radically changed. Or all the current
indignation could fail to change the status quo. Finance professionals have a lot
riding on the outcome; action or inaction could mean the difference between a stock
market that attracts or repels investors.
© 2003, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and
may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed,
published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written
permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2003, PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.
Print-friendly format
© 2003 Primedia Business Magazines & Media.
http://www.registeredrep.com/ar/finance_cleaning_house (2 of 2)11/13/2003 6:31:03 AM
E-mail this information
About Us | Contact Us | For Advertisers | For Search Partners | Privacy Policy