A CMOS 5.4/3.24-Gbps Dual-Rate CDR with Enhanced Quarter

advertisement
A CMOS 5.4/3.24-Gbps Dual-Rate CDR with
Enhanced Quarter-Rate Linear Phase Detector
Jae-Wook Yoo, Tae-Ho Kim, Dong-Kyun Kim, and Jin-Ku Kang
This paper presents a clock and data recovery circuit
that supports dual data rates of 5.4 Gbps and 3.24 Gbps
for DisplayPort v1.2 sink device. A quarter-rate linear
phase detector (PD) is used in order to mitigate high speed
circuit design effort. The proposed linear PD results in
better jitter performance by increasing up and down pulse
widths of the PD and removes dead-zone problem of
charge pump circuit. A voltage-controlled oscillator is
designed with a ‘Mode’ switching control for frequency
selection. The measured RMS jitter of recovered clock
signal is 2.92 ps, and the peak-to-peak jitter is 24.89 ps
under 231–1 bit-long pseudo-random bit sequence at the
bitrate of 5.4 Gbps. The chip area is 1.0 mm×1.3 mm, and
the power consumption is 117 mW from a 1.8 V supply
using 0.18 µm CMOS process.
Keywords: Linear phase detector, clock and data
recovery, quarter-rate PD, dual-rate voltage controlled
oscillator (VCO), DisplayPort.
Manuscript received Oct. 04, 2010; revised Dec. 24, 2010; accepted Jan. 13, 2011.
This work is supported by Inha University and Korea Institute for Advancement of
Technology (KIAT) through the Human Resource Training Project for Strategic Technology.
Jae-Wook Yoo (phone: +82 10 9197 6271, email: jwyoo@siliconworks.co.kr) is with
Siliconworks Co., Daejeon, Rep. of Korea.
Tae-Ho Kim (corresponding author, email: taeho.kim.inha@gmail.com), Dong-Kyun Kim
(email: crow@inha.edu), and Jin-Ku Kang (email: jkang@inha.ac.kr) are with the School of
Electronics Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Rep. of Korea.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4218/etrij.11.0110.0578
752
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
© 2011
I. Introduction
Clock and data recovery (CDR) circuits are used extensively
in high-speed interface systems, such as Ethernet receivers,
disk drive, digital mobile receivers, and serial high-speed
interfaces, to extract timing information from data. DisplayPort
is a high-speed digital display interface standard set by the
Video Electronics Standard Association (VESA) for highresolution display devices. The DisplayPort source transmits
data in serial, and the sink device should recover clock from the
input data [1]. On the receiver side, the most important building
block is the CDR, and various design approaches of CDR
design have been published [2]-[7]. The phase detector (PD) in
the CDR, a linear type PD, is preferred to a bang-bang type PD
since the linear PD has better jitter performance. Also, subrate
PDs have been proposed to mitigate design effort and process
restriction for high-speed operation circuit. However, the larger
subrate linear PD (for example, 1/8 rate) increases a
complexity compared to full-rate PD and has drawbacks such
as larger area and layout mismatch [2].
In this paper, we designed a CDR with an enhanced quarterrate PD working at dual data rates, 5.4 Gbps and 3.24 Gbps. A
quarter-rate PD generating increased up/down pulse widths is
proposed. Section II describes the CDR architecture and
operating principle. Details of the building block are given in
section III. The measurement results are presented in section IV.
Section V presents the conclusion and the performance
summary of the work.
II. CDR Architecture
Figure 1 shows the block diagram of the proposed dual-rate
CDR. A quarter-rate CDR architecture is adopted [3]. A
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
Data
Divider
Lock
detector
REF_CLK
Latch
Mode
UP
[3:0]
Loop filter
Charge
pump
1/4-rate PD
DN (Iup:Idn=4:5)
[3:0]
MUX
R1
C1
4 bit
Latch
VCO
UP[0]
DN[0]
CLK270"
C2
Loop 2
Latch
4-phase Rclk
Latch
quarter-rate PD generating enlarged up/down pulse widths and
charge pump (CP) blocks are proposed.
The dual-loop architecture consists of a frequencyacquisition loop and a phase-locked loop [2], [3], [6], [8].
During the frequency locking process (Loop 1), the frequency
detector (FD) compares the frequency difference between an
external reference clock and recovered clock. When the rising
edge of the REF_CLK stays within two adjacent phase clocks
for a certain period, the frequency lock detector sends the lock
signal to shift the operation from the frequency acquisition
process to the phase locking process. During the phase locking
(Loop 2), the clock is recovered and the data are retimed. Since
the first draft version of DisplayPort v1.2 standard should
support the dual data rates (3.24 Gbps and 5.4 Gbps), the dualrate voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) is designed. The target
clock frequency can be selected by the ‘Mode’ signal generated
by the DisplayPort link layer detecting the input data rate. At
‘Mode 0’, the VCO operates at 810 MHz, which is a quarter
rate of 3.24 Gbps input data. At ‘Mode 1’, the VCO generates a
1.35 GHz clock for 5.4 Gbps data. The DisplayPort leaves the
designer as an option for the CDR design whether using a
reference clock or not using a reference clock (reference-less
CDR). In this paper, the CDR with reference clock is adopted
for the faster lock.
III. Building Block Design
1. Enhanced Quarter-Rate Linear PD
Figure 2 shows the proposed quarter-rate linear PD. The
proposed PD consists of latches, XOR, and AND gates. The
two outputs from the second (CLK90') and first (CLK90)
latches are compared by XOR gates and generate UP[3:0]
signals. These UP[3:0] signals also make DN[3:0] signals
through the AND gates’ operation with the four phase-
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
CLK270
Latch
C
Latch
D
Latch
CLK0'
Latch
A
Latch
Latch
Latch
Latch
G
UP[2]
DN[2]
CLK90"
H
UP[3]
DN[3]
CLK180"
PD core
CLK90"
CLK180"
Latch
CLK270'
CLK270
CLK0"
Latch
CLK180'
CLK180
DN[1]
Latch
CLK90'
CLK90
UP[1]
CLK0"
CLK0'
CLK0
F
CLK270'
Latch
Recovered
data
Fig. 1. Block diagram of dual-loop CDR with quarter-rate PD.
B
CLK180'
Latch
CLK90
CLK180
Data
recovery
E
Mode
Loop 1
Data
input
Latch
CLK90'
Latch
CLK0
FD
A
CLK270"
Latch
CLK dummy
Fig. 2. Block diagram of proposed quarter-rate linear PD with
dummy delay.
recovered clocks from VCO (CLK0", CLK90", CLK180" and
CLK270"). Also, the A, B, C, and D outputs are provided to the
data recovery (DR) block to retime the data. Linear PD is
affected by clock duty and unwanted gate delay mismatch due
to parasitic elements. In practice, the proposed PD is
implemented with clock and data buffer for delay matching. In
this work, all gates in the PD are implemented with current
mode logic for supporting high-speed operation.
In the quarter-rate PD operation, the up pulse width is
proportional to the phase error, whereas the down pulse width
is constant regardless of the phase error. In the locked state, the
up pulse width is 2.5 times of 1-bit data period (2.5×TBIT) and
down pulse width is twice of data rate (2.0×TBIT). Thus, the
ratio of the up and down pulse widths is 5/4. The difference
between up and down pulse widths can be compensated by the
CP with a reverse current ratio.
The timing diagram of the quarter-rate linear PD is shown in
Fig. 3. Waveforms, A, B, C, and D are the first latch outputs
and E, F, G, and H are the second latch outputs. Figure 4 shows
the comparison of the simulated current mismatch effect in the
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
753
DATA
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
200
150
PD output average (ps)
CLK0
CLK90
CLK180
CLK270
A
0
1
B
2
1
2
C
0
5
H
0
UP1
4
UP3
1
6
DN2
1
2
7
5
5
6
2.0
15.0
12.5
10.0
1.6
7.5
1.4
A
5.0
1.2
2.5
1.0
0
0
1.0
2.0
Time (ns)
(a)
0.8
3.0
I (µA)
1.8
Input
B
2.0
1.8
10.0
7.5
A
5.0
1.6
1.4
V (V)
B
Y1 (V)
Y0 (µA)
15.0
12.5
CP_out
Input
1.2
2.5
1.0
0
–2.5
0
1.0
2.0
Time (ns)
(b)
0.8
3.0
Fig. 4. Simulated current mismatch effect by up/down pulse
width: (a) reference PD (1.5×TBIT) and (b) proposed PD
(2.5×TBIT). Mismatch ratio: A/B.
CP between the reference PD [3] and the proposed PD.
Figure 4(a) represents the PD in [3], and Fig. 4(b) represents
the proposed PD assuming the same resistor-capacitor (RC)
time constant at the PD output node. The CP’s up/down current
is proportional to up/down pulse width in the PD. As the input
data rate goes higher, the current pulse will become shorter and
the current mismatch ratio will be increased due to the RC
effect. Compared to the current pulse in Fig. 4(a), the current
754
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
100
150
Proposed
[2]
work
Quarter1/8-rate
rate
[3]
[4]
[5]
QuarterHalf-rate Full-rate
rate
8
Fig. 3. Timing diagram of proposed quarter-rate linear PD.
CP_out
0
50
Phase error (ps)
Pulse Up 2.5×TBIT 3.5×TBIT 1.5×TBIT 0.5×TBIT 0.5×TBIT
width Down 2.0×TBIT 4.0×TBIT 1.0×TBIT 1.0×TBIT 0.5×TBIT
7
4
4
DN3
6
3
3
8
Type of PD
5
DN1
Reference
5
2
2
7
7
4
DN0
8
6
UP2
–50
Table 1. Comparison of proposed quarter-rate linear PD with other
subrate linear PDs (TBIT=width of one bit data).
8
5
3
3
–100
7
7
4
2
–150
Fig. 5. Simulated PD gain.
4
1
–50
–100
8
6
3
5.4 Gbps
3.24 Gbps
0
–200
–150
8
7
50
6
3
UP0
7
5
2
G
7
6
4
2
F
8
6
4
3
1
6
5
3
1
E
5
3
2
D
4
100
pulse in Fig. 4(b) has lower current mismatch ratio (A/B).
Therefore, the proposed PD leads to the lower jitter generation.
Figure 5 shows the simulated PD gain for each data rate. The
pulse widths of a generated up/down pulses (PD output) versus
phase difference between the data edge and clock edge are
plotted for each data rate.
Table 1 shows the comparison of the proposed quarter-rate
linear PD with other subrate linear PDs published before.
When the PD in [3] is compared with the PD in [4], the
difference is an increased up pulse width. Compared to the PDs
in [3]-[5], the proposed PD has the longer pulse width.
Comparing the proposed PD to [2], the proposed PD’s pulse
widths are equivalent to 4×TBIT (up pulse) and 5×TBIT (down
pulse), respectively, if it is modified to 1/8 rate PD as in [2]. As
a result, the proposed PD has the widest pulse width. Hence, it
can show the better jitter performance. Though the pulse width
is increased, total current consumption can be controlled by
adjusting the CP current.
2. VCO with Mode Control
Since the CDR should support two different data rates, the
VCO should generate two different frequencies. At each
frequency, the VCO generates four different phase clocks for
the quarter-rate PD. The ring oscillator type VCO is proposed
with a digital mode switch for selecting the operating frequency.
The frequency ‘Mode’ value is provided from the link layer
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
VDD
Mode
M9
2.25
M5 M3
M4 M6
Out
Out
M10
Mode
2.00
In
Vctrl
M1
M2
Frequency (GHz)
1.75
In
M7
1.50
1.25
1.00
1.35 GHz (FF, 0°C)
1.35 GHz (TT, 27°C)
1.35 GHz (FF, 85°C)
810 MHz (FF, 0°C)
810 MHz (TT, 27°C)
810 MHz (FF, 85°C)
0.75
0.50
Fig. 6. Dual-rate VCO delay cell.
td = Reff_load × Ceff_out .
(1)
The VCO changes its effective resistance by adding PMOS
(M9-M10) elements which are controlled by the ‘Mode’ signal.
At ‘Mode 0’, the M9 and M10 are in the cut-off (switch-off)
region and the node is in open state. At ‘Mode 1’, the M9 and
M10 are in the linear region (switch-on) and they act like an
additional resistor. Assuming that the total effective resistance
at ‘Mode 0’ is Reff1 and the effective resistance of M9 and M10
is Rm9,10, the total effective resistance at ‘Mode 1’ will be
Reff1 || Rm9,10 and it is smaller than Reff1. Consequently, according
to (2), the time delay at ‘Mode 1’ is shorter than at ‘Mode 0’.
Thus, two target frequencies (810 MHz and 1.35 GHz) are
controlled by the ‘Mode’ signal.
Reff1 @ Mode 0 > Reff1 || Rm9,10 @ Mode 1.
0.50
3. CP Circuit
The CP circuit is shown in Fig. 8. A unity gain buffer is used
to clamp the terminal voltages of current sources during the
zero-current pumping period. In this way, glitches on the loop
0.75
1.00
1.25
Control voltage (V)
(a)
1.50
1.75
2.00
0
–25.0
1.35 GHz
–50.0
810 MHz
–75.0
–100
–125
–150 3
10
104
105
106
Relative frequency (Hz)
(b)
107
108
Fig. 7. VCO characteristics: (a) VCO operating range and (b)
phase noise.
VDD
Output
UP
UPB
(2)
The proposed VCO also adds current source to decrease VCO
gain, and it covers all tuning range of the VCO.
Simulations show that the gains of VCO are 920.55 MHz/V
at 3.24 Gbps and 832.48 MHz/V at 5.4 Gbps, as shown in
Fig. 7(a). Corner simulations show that the target frequency
ranges are safely covered under the process, supply voltage,
and temperature (PVT) variations. The simulated VCO phase
noise shows –80 dBc/Hz and –88 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset
from 810 MHz and 1.35 GHz clock frequency, respectively, as
shown in Fig. 7(b).
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
0.25
25.0
Phase noise (dBc/Hz)
protocol.
Figure 6 shows the schematic of the proposed dual-rate VCO
delay cell. The load of the differential pair is made up of
p-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor
(PMOS). According to (1), the delay of the delay cell can be
decided by the load effective resistance and capacitance:
0.25
0.0
DN
DNB
4Is
5Is
Fig. 8. CP circuit.
filter due to the charge sharing can be minimized. Since the up
and down pulse widths of the PD are different, two different
bias current sources are placed. The up/down current ratio is set
to be 4/5 (reverse of the up/down pulse width ratio). The up
and down current values of the CP are 12 μA and 15 μA,
respectively, in the CDR loop. If the CP has a ±5% current
mismatch due to PVT variations, 0.08 UI of data eye is
affected.
4. Data Recovery
Since the proposed CDR recovers the data with the quarter-
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
755
CLK0
A
VDD
DFF
Latch
DFF
4 bit
counter
RDATA1
MUX
MUX
C
CLK90
DFF
Latch
DFF
Count
reset
DFF
Mode
REF_CLK
REF_CLK
CLK0
B
4
DFF
Lock
signal
Reset
DFF
Fig. 11. Block diagram of frequency lock detector.
Latch
RDATA2
MUX
MUX
D
Detection phase margin (90°)
Latch
CLK90
①
⑮
REF_CLK
DDFF
CLK0
CLK45
CLK90
MUX
Count
reset
Lock
signal
VDD
Count start (4 bit)
FLD end
Fig. 12. Timing diagram of frequency lock detector.
Fig. 9. Block diagram of data recovery.
5. Frequency Lock Detector
DATA
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CLK0
CLK90
CLK180
CLK270
A
0
1
B
C
D
MUX A&C
2
1
0
0
4
2
2
3
1
6
5
2
7
6
4
7
5
4
1
8
6
4
3
0
MUX B&D
5
3
8
7
8
6
3
8
5
7
CLK45
RDATA1
0
2
4
6
RDATA2
–1
1
3
5
Fig. 10. Timing diagram of data retiming block.
rate PD, it needs data retiming block for recovering the data
with 1:2 demultiplexed formats. The data retiming block is
shown in Fig. 9. It consists of 2:1 multiplexer and double edge
triggered D-F/F (DDFF). Figure 10 shows the timing diagram
of the data retiming block. A, B, C, and D are outputs of the
first latches in the PD. The A and C outputs are selected by
CLK0, and the B and D outputs are selected by CLK90. Also,
two multiplexed outputs (A and C, B and D) are realigned by
the DDFF. Consequently, the parallelized 2-bit signals are
recovered and aligned by CLK45 (45 degree shifted from
CLK0).
756
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
Figure 11 shows the frequency lock detector block. The
resolution of the frequency lock detector is determined by (3).
Thus, the frequency detection resolution can be improved by
increasing the number of the counter bit size. The timing
diagram of the frequency lock detector is shown in Fig. 12. If
the reference clock is located between zero phase clock
(CLK0) and 90 degree phase clock (CLK90) for a certain
period, the frequency lock signal is on. After the frequency lock
detector generates the lock signal, the lock signal makes the
CDR shift the operation from the frequency acquisition process
to the phase locking process. Since the 4-bit counter is used in
this design, the lock signal is on if the generated clocks (CLK0,
CLK90) stay at the same position during continuous 16
reference clock period.
resolution =
90°
2
bit_counter
× 360°
= ±1.56%.
(3)
IV. Measurement Results
The CDR circuit using the quarter-rate linear PD with
enhancing the CP pulse width has been fabricated in a 0.18-µm
complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) RF
technology. The chip consumes 117 mW at 5.4-Gbps data rate.
The chip microphotograph is shown in Fig. 13. Loop
bandwidth of the implemented CDR has 10 MHz, and its
capacitances were implemented using metal-insulator-metal
capacitor for accurate capacitance on the chip. Also, the loop
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
102
Data
buffer QuarterCDR
tree rate PD
CP
VCO
Loop
filter
PLL
CP
Jitter tolerance (UI)
DR Output
circuit buffer
Jitter spec.
Measurement
101
100
10–1
10–2
105
106
Fig. 13. Photomicrograph of proposed chip.
107
108
Jitter frequency (Hz)
109
1010
Fig. 15. Jitter tolerance.
Table 2. Performance summary of proposed CDR and other works.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 14. Jitter measurement result: recovered data eye and jitter
histogram of recovered clock (a) at 5.4 Gbps PRBS
input data and (b) at 3.24 Gbps PRBS input data.
filter values are R1 (1.6 KΩ), C1 (900 fF), and C2 (200 fF).
The core area of the CDR circuit is 1 mm×1.3 mm. For
facilitating the measurements, a test chip was mounted on a
FR-4 printed circuit board using bonding wires.
Figure 14 shows the measured eye-diagram of the recovered
half-rate data output and recovered clock for 231–1 pseudorandom bit sequence (PRBS) input data at 5.4 Gbps and
3.24 Gbps. The measured RMS jitter and peak-to-peak jitter of
the recovered clock are 2.92 ps and 24.89 ps at 5.4 Gbps, and
4.55 ps and 27.4 ps at 3.24 Gbps, respectively. The bit error rate
is measured to be less than 10-12 at both data rates with PRBS
231–1 data format. Figure 15 illustrates the jitter tolerance at
5.4 Gbps. It shows that the designed circuit meets the jitter
tolerance specification.
The performance comparison of the proposed CDR is given
in Table 2. The proposed one and previous 5-Gbps CDRs with
the same process were compared. The proposed circuit shows
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
Specification
This work
[2]
[5]
Technology
(CMOS)
[9]
0.18 µm
0.18 µm
0.18 µm
Supply voltage
1.8 V
1.8 V
1.8 V
1.8 V
0.18 µm
Data rate
3.24/5.4 Gbps
5 Gbps
5 Gbps
155 Mbps to
3.125 Gbps
PD type
Quarter-rate
1/8-rate
Full-rate
Full-rate
2.92 ps
Clock jitter
(@5.4 Gbps)
6.8 ps
6.04ps
6.4ps
(RMS)
4.55 ps
(@5 Gbps) (@5 Gbps) (@3.125 Gbps)
31
(@2 –1 PRBS)
(@3.24 Gbps)
Power
117 mW
consumption
144 mW 130 mW
95 mW
(@5.4 Gbps)
(w/o I/O buffer)
better jitter and power consumption performance. Since [3] and
[4] adopted LC-VCO rather than ring oscillator type VCO and
designed for a 10 Gbps data rate, the measurement data of [3]
and [4] were not included in the comparison table.
V. Conclusion
A CDR circuit that supports dual data rates of 5.4 Gbps and
3.24 Gbps for DisplayPort v1.2 sink device is presented in this
paper. The CDR is realized with a quarter-rate PD with
enhancing the up and down pulses. The proposed CDR circuit
is fabricated in a 0.18-µm CMOS technology, and it shows
2.92-ps RMS and 24.89-ps peak-to-peak jitter in the recovered
quarter-rate clock from 231–1 PRBS at 5.4-Gbps serial input.
Acknowledgment
Authors thank the IDEC program and for its hardware and
software assistance for the design and simulation.
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
757
References
[1] VESA, DisplayPort Standard, v1.2, Jan. 2010.
[2] Y.S. Seo et al., “A 5-Gbit/s Clock-and-Data-Recovery Circuit
With 1/8-Rate Linear Phase Detector in 0.18-um CMOS
Technology,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. 56, no. 1, Jan. 2009,
pp. 6-10.
[3] S. Byun et al., “A 10-Gb/s CMOS CDR and DEMUX IC with a
Quarter-Rate Linear Phase Detector,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits,
vol. 41, no. 11, Nov. 2006, pp. 2566-2576.
[4] J. Savoj and B. Razavi, “A 10-Gb/s CMOS Clock and Data
Recovery Circuit with a Half-Rate Linear Phase Detector,” IEEE
J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, no. 5, May 2001, pp. 761-767.
[5] D. Rennie and M. Sachdev, “A 5-Gb/s CDR Circuit with
Automatically Calibrated Linear Phase Detector,” IEEE Trans.
Circuits Syst., vol. 55, no. 3, Apr. 2008, pp. 796-803.
[6] H.S. Muthali, T.P. Thomas, and I.A. Young, “A CMOS 10-Gb/s
SONET Transceiver,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, no. 7,
July 2004, pp. 1026-1033.
[7] M. Hsieh and G.E. Sobelman, “Architectures for Multi-Gigabit
Wire-Linked Clock and Data Recovery,” IEEE Circuit Syst. Mag.,
vol. 8, 2008, pp. 45-57.
[8] L. Henrickson and D. Shen, “Low-Power Fully Integrated 10Gb/s SONET/SDH Transceiver in 0.13-μm CMOS,” IEEE J.
Solid State Circuit, vol. 38, no. 10, Oct. 2003, pp. 1595-1601.
[9] R. Yang et al., “A 155.52 Mbps-3.125 Gbps Continuous-Rate Clock
and Data Recovery Circuit,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuit, vol. 41, no.
6, June 2006, pp. 1380-1390.
Dong-Kyun Kim received the BS in
electronics engineering from Inha University,
Incheon, Rep. of Korea, in 2009. He is currently
toward the MS at the same university. His
research interests include high speed clock and
data recovery and VLSI circuit design.
Jin-Ku Kang received his BS in nuclear
engineering from Seoul National University, his
MS in electrical engineering from New Jersey
Institute of Technology, and his PhD in
electrical engineering from North Carolina State
University, in 1983, 1990, and 1996,
respectively. From 1983 to 1988, he worked at
Samsung Electronics, Inc., Rep. of Korea. In 1988, he was with Texas
Instruments Korea. From 1996 to 1997, he was with Intel as a senior
design engineer. Since 1997, he has been a professor in School of
Electronics Engineering at Inha University. His research interests are
high-speed CMOS VLSI design, mixed mode IC design, and highspeed serial interface design.
Jae-Wook Yoo received the BS and MS in
electronics engineering from Inha University,
Incheon, Rep. of Korea, in 2008 and 2010,
respectively. Since 2010, he has been with
Siliconworks Co., Daejeon, Rep. of Korea. His
research interests include high speed clock and
data recovery and VLSI circuit design.
Tae-Ho Kim received the BS and MS degrees
in electronics engineering from Inha University,
Incheon, Rep. of Korea, in 2007 and 2009,
respectively. He is currently working toward the
PhD at the same university. His research
interests are mixed mode high speed links
interface and signal integrity.
758
Jae-Wook Yoo et al.
ETRI Journal, Volume 33, Number 5, October 2011
Download