August 7, 2015
Surface Water Permits Branch
Kentucky Division of Water
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
Subject: KPDES Permit Application for Sections 4B & 5 of the East End Crossing of the
LSIORBP
KPDES NO. KY0111864
AI ID: 115698
Jefferson County, Kentucky
As per your KPDES Application Notice of Deficiency dated July 23, 2015, and conversations
with the KDOW on August 6, 2015, the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA) and the Indiana
Department of Transportation (INDOT), re-submits for your review and approval the enclosed
KPDES Permit Application for the proposed storm water drainage system for Sections 4B & 5 of
the East End Crossing of the Louisville – Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project
(LSIORBP).
This system, required by the 2012 Revised Record of Decision (RROD), the 2003 FEIS and the
2012 SFEIS for the Bridges Project, will capture storm water runoff from the East End Bridge
and approaches, collect it and carry it out of the Louisville Water Company (LWC) Wellhead
Protection Area near Prospect, Kentucky. There will be a single outfall, located within the
project right of way, at Harrods Creek, River Mile 0.8 that will discharge storm water. No nonstorm water discharges are proposed. The permit application includes the design documentation
performed by the Developer’s engineering consultant, Jacobs Engineering.
In accordance with the 2012 RROD the project obtained concurrence on the final design from
the Louisville Water Company (on March 23, 2015) and the Kentucky Division of Water (April
22, 2015). This correspondence is included as an attachment to the permit application.
We appreciate the cooperation and efforts that KDOW has provided to-date to help in making
the LSIORB Project successful and we look forward to your continued involvement. If you have
any questions, please contact Phil Banton, IFA Permits Coordinator at (502) 498-8896 or feel
free to give either one of us a call.
Sincerely,
Ronald Heustis, PE (Indiana)
INDOT Senior Project Manager
812-202-4075 o
317-691-6620 c
Cc:
IFA/INDOT: Phil Banton, Dennis Bassett, Paul Boone, Kevin Hetrick, Laura Hilden,
Steve Nicaise, Cindy Shell, File
KYTC:
Andy Barber, Barry Sanders, David Waldner
FHWA:
Rick Marquis, Thomas L. Nelson, Jeffrey Schmidt
Attachments:
KPDES Permit Application for Sections 4B & 5 of the East End Crossing of the
LSIORBP (Revised August 7, 2015)
Application for Section 402 Permit
Sections 4B & 5 (East End Bridge and Approaches)
Ohio River Bridges Project
Indiana Finance Authority
August 7, 2015
Table of Contents
KPDES Permit Application
Sections 4B & 5, East End Bridge and Approaches
Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project (LSIORBP)
PERMIT APPLICATION
1. KPDES Form 1
2. KPDES Form F
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map (topographic) – location of outfall
2. Vicinity Map (aerial) - with project limits
3. Correspondence
3.1.
Louisville Water Company concurrence on proposed stormwater
system in the WHPA
3.2.
Kentucky Division of Water concurrence on proposed stormwater
system in the WHPA
3.3.
Agency correspondence accompanying concurrences
4. Design Documentation & Drainage Maps
5. Current Permits
KPDES FORM 1
KENTUCKY POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
PERMIT APPLICATION
This is an application to: (check one)
Apply for a new permit.
Apply for reissuance of expiring permit.
Apply for a construction permit.
Modify an existing permit.
Give reason for modification under Item II.A.
A complete application consists of this form and one of the
following:
Form A, Form B, Form C, Form F, or Form SC
For additional information contact:
Surface Water Permits Branch (502) 564-3410
AGENCY
USE
I. FACILITY LOCATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION
A. Name of Business, Municipality, Company, Etc. Requesting Permit
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
B. Facility Name and Location
C. Primary Mailing Address (all facility correspondence will be sent to
Facility Location Name:
this address). Include owner’s mailing address (if different) in D.
Facility Contact Name and Title: Mr.
Ms.
Ohio River Bridges Project – Sections 4B & 5
Facility Location Address (i.e. street, road, etc., not P.O. Box):
Dennis L. Bassett, Public Finance Director
Mailing Address:
East End - Prospect Area near the Ohio River
Facility Location City, State, Zip Code:
Indiana Finance Authority
One North Capitol Ave, Suite 900
Mailing City, State, Zip Code:
Prospect, KY 40059
D. Owner’s name (if not the same as in part A and C):
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Facility Contact Telephone Number:
Owner’s Mailing Address:
(317) 233-4337
Owner’s Telephone Number (if different):
II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION
A. Provide a brief description of activities, products, etc:
Operation and maintenance of an interstate highway that includes the collection of storm water runoff from the roadway surfaces and
bridge decks. The permit application is for the storm water collection system in Sections 4B and 5 of the East End Crossing of the
Louisville – Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project. The purpose of the storm water system is to convey the runoff, collect it in
lined detention ponds and discharge it into Harrods Creek, out of the Louisville Water Company (LWC) Wellhead Protection Area.
See attached documentation for details.
B. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code and Description
Principal SIC Code &
Description:
4785 Fixed Facilities and Inspection and Weighing Services for Motor Vehicle Transportation
Other SIC Codes:
III. FACILITY LOCATION
A. Attach a U.S. Geological Survey 7 ½ minute quadrangle map for the site. (See instructions)
B. County where facility is located:
City where facility is located (if applicable):
Jefferson
Prospect
C. Body of water receiving discharge:
Harrods Creek
DEP 7032
1
Revised February 2009
D. Facility Site Latitude (degrees, minutes, seconds):
N 38 deg 19’ 51”
Facility Site Longitude (degrees, minutes, seconds):
W 85 deg 37’ 46”
E. Method used to obtain latitude & longitude (see instructions):
GIS
DEP 7032
2
Revised February 2009
IV. OWNER/OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. Type of Ownership:
Publicly Owned
Privately Owned
State Owned
B. Operator Contact Information (See instructions)
Both Public and Private Owned
Name of Treatment Plant Operator:
Federally owned
Telephone Number:
Not applicable
Operator Mailing Address (Street):
Operator Mailing Address (City, State, Zip Code):
Is the operator also the owner?
Is the operator certified? If yes, list certification class and number below.
Yes
Yes
No
Certification Class:
No
Certification Number:
V. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
Current NPDES Number:
Issue Date of Current Permit:
Expiration Date of Current Permit:
KYR10H336
Other DOW Operational Permit #:
401 WQC #2013-017-7M (AI#115698)
Stream Constr uction Permit 20169-REV
Other Existing Environmental Permit #:
April 8, 2013
Kentucky DMR Permit Number(s):
Nov. 30, 2019
Sludge Disposal Permit Number:
Other Existing Environmental Permit #:
Other Existing Environmental Permit #:
USACE Sect. 404 LRL-2011-375-omb
USFWS MB 75575A - O
Which of the following additional environmental permit/registration categories will also apply to this facility?
CATEGORY
EXISTING PERMIT WITH NO.
PERMIT NEEDED WITH
PLANNED APPLICATION DATE
Air Emission Source
Solid or Special Waste
Hazardous Waste - Registration or Permit
VI. DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS (DMRs)
KPDES permit holders are required to submit DMRs to the Division of Water on a regular schedule (as defined by the KPDES
permit). Information in this section serves to specifically identify the name and telephone number of the DMR official and the DMR
mailing address (if different from the primary mailing address in Section I.C).
A. DMR Official (i.e., the department, office or individual
designated as responsible for submitting DMR forms to the
Division of Water):
Mr. Dennis L. Bassett
DMR Official Telephone Number:
(317) 233-4337
B. DMR Mailing Address:
• Address the Division of Water will use to mail DMR forms (if different from mailing address in Section I.C), or
• Contact address if another individual, company, laboratory, etc. completes DMRs for you; e.g., contract laboratory address.
DMR Mailing Name:
DMR Mailing Address:
DMR Mailing City, State, Zip Code:
DEP 7032
3
Revised February 2009
Filing fee paid on-line.
KPDES FORM 1 -- INSTRUCTIONS
Section A: General Instructions
With the exceptions described in Section C of these instructions, Federal and State laws prohibit you from the discharge of
pollutants into the waters of the United States or waters of the Commonwealth.
Where to file
Return completed application forms to Surface Water Permits Branch, Division of Water, 200 Fair Oaks Lane, Frankfort,
Kentucky 40601.
When to file
File the application at least 180 days prior to expiration of your current KPDES permit or at least 180 days prior to startup of a
new facility.
Fees
Filing fees and five-year permit fees are listed in Section B. Filing Fees are not refundable.
Completion of Forms
Unless otherwise specified in the detailed instructions, each item in each form must be answered. To indicate that each item has
been considered, enter “NA,” for not applicable, if a particular item does not fit the circumstances or characteristics of your facility or
activity. If more space is necessary to answer a question, attach a separate sheet entitled “Additional Information.”
Section B: Completing Form 1
Listed below are explanations of select Form 1 questions. If further information is needed concerning any question, please contact
Division of Water, Surface Water Permits Branch at (502) 564-3410.
I. Facility Location and Contact Information
A. Use the official or legal name of the business, company, municipality, etc. requesting permit. Do not use a colloquial name. Give
the name, as it is legally referred to, of the person, firm, public organization, or any other entity that operates the facility described in
this application. This may or may not be the same name as the facility. The operator of the facility is the legal entity which controls
the facility’s operation rather than the plant or site manager. This use of “operator” in many cases is not the same as the treatment
plant Certified Operator.
B. The facility name should be the name by which the facility is commonly known and/or uniquely identified. Enter the facility’s
official or legal name. Do not use a colloquial name. The information given as the facility name and location address should be the
for the actual location of the facility (i.e. road name, highway number, not the P O Box address). If there is no street address, identify
the facility location by the most accurate alternative geographic information such as direction and distance to nearest intersection or
permanent landmark (e.g., ½ mile east of intersection of KY 70 and US 127).
C. The primary mailing address should be the legal permittee of record and is the address where correspondence regarding the
application, permit, etc. for the facility will be sent unless otherwise indicated. This often is not the address used to designate the
location of the facility or activity. Give the name, title, and work telephone number of a person who is thorough familiar with the
operation of the facility and with the facts reported in this application and who can be contacted by reviewing offices if necessary.
The owner mailing address is to be provided in “D” if different from the primary mailing address. Discharge Monitoring Reports
will be mailed to the address indicated in part VI.
D. If the applicant for the permit is not the owner of the facility, include the name of the owner of the facility. Include the mailing
address of the owner of the facility if the owner is not the applicant for the permit.
II. Facility Description
A. Briefly describe the nature of the business and the activities being conducted that require a KPDES permit.
B. List, in descending order of significance, the four 4-digit standard industrial classification (SIC) codes that best describe your facility
in terms of the principal products or services you produce or provide. Also, specify each classification in words. These
classifications may differ from the SIC codes describing the operation generating the discharge. The SIC codes are numbers and
descriptions of activities classified by the Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. These are found in
the 1987 Edition of the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. List the SIC codes(s) that best describe the products or
services provided by the facility in descending order of importance. If an SIC code book is not available, please describe in detail the
nature of the business and activities conducted so that an appropriate code can be assigned.
DEP 7032
1
Revised February 2009
III. Facility Location
A. Attach a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 7 1/2 minute topographic quadrangle map(s) extending at least one mile beyond the
property boundary of the discharge source. Depict or mark the facility and each of its intake and discharge structures. Also mark the
locations of those wells, springs, surface water bodies, and drinking water wells listed in public records or otherwise known to the
applicant within one-quarter mile of the facility property boundary. USGS maps may be obtained from the University of Kentucky,
Mines and Minerals Bldg. Room 104, Lexington, Kentucky 40506. Phone: (859) 257-3896.
B. List the county and, if applicable, city where facility is located.
C. List the body of water receiving discharge.
D. List the latitude and longitude for the facility site. The latitude/longitude reading for the site should be taken at the influent to the
wastewater treatment plant, if applicable.
E. List the method used to obtain the latitude and longitude (i.e. topo map coordinates, GPS reading, etc.)
F. List the facility's Dun and Bradstreet Number if applicable.
IV. Owner/Operator Information
A. Place a check in the applicable type ownership as listed.
B. These sections must be completed by all municipal and sanitary wastewater applicants.
For those facilities that require a Certified Operator, enter the name of a Certified Operator who will operate the treatment plant,
or enter the name of an operator who will be certified before commencement of discharge. The operator of the treatment plant is
often someone other than the operator of the facility identified in Part I.
List the name and address of the person who operates the sewage treatment plant.
Indicate if the operator is also the owner.
The operator must be currently certified with the Division of Water. For information concerning those requirements,
Contact: Division of Compliance Assistance, Certification Section, at (502) 564-0323.
List the Operator’s Certification Class and Certification Number.
V.
List any existing environmental permits that the facility has or will be applying for. KPDES permits use an NPDES generated
number.
VI.
List the address where Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms are to be mailed. Complete this section if you are requesting
a different address than the address in Part I (C.)
VII.
Application Filing Fee
The payment of a filing fee as listed below must accompany the application for a KPDES Permit. Your check must be made
payable to "Kentucky State Treasurer." For permit renewals, to ensure proper credit to your account, please include
the KPDES permit number on the check. This fee will be applied toward the final discharge permit fee. The filing fee is not
refundable if the application is withdrawn or the permit is denied. Listed below are the facility categories, associated base fiveyear fees, and application filing fees. (See the separate "General Instructions" for definitions of facility categories.)
Facility Category
Five-Year Fee (100%)
Application Filing Fee (20%)
Major Industry
$7,000
$1,400
Minor Industry
$4,500
$900
Non-Process Industry
$2,200
$440
Large Non-POTW
$3,700
$740
Intermediate Non-POTW
$3,200
$640
Small Non-POTW
$2,200
$440
Agriculture
$1,200
$240
Surface Mining Operation
$3,300
$660
501(c)(3)
$100
$20
If this application is for a new project, see separate General Instructions for the applicable Construction Permit fee.
A permit application cannot be processed unless the application filing fee and (if applicable) construction permit fee is enclosed.
Make your check payable to "Kentucky State Treasurer."
VIII.
DEP 7032
Certification
The permit application must be signed as follows:
Corporation: by a principal executive officer of at least the level of vice president.
Partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor respectively.
Municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official.
2
Revised February 2009
Section C—Activities Which Do Not Require KPDES Permits
You are not required to obtain a KPDES permit if your discharge is one of the following categories, as provided by
the Clean Water Act (CWA) and KPDES regulations (401 KAR Chapter 5).
1.
Dredged or Fill Material: Discharges of dredged or fill material as defined at 33 CFR 323.2 into waters of the
Commonwealth do not need KPDES permits if the dredging or filling is authorized by a permit issued by the U.S.
Army Corp of Engineers.
2.
Discharges into Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW): The introduction of sewage, industrial wastes, or
other pollutants into a POTW does not need a KPDES permit. You must comply with all applicable pretreatment
standards promulgated under Section 307 (b) of the CWA, which may be included in the permit issued to the
POTW. If you have a plan or an agreement to switch to a POTW in the future, this does not relieve you of the
obligation to apply for and receive a KPDES permit until you have stopped discharging pollutants into waters of
the Commonwealth.
3.
Dischargers into Privately Owned Treatment Works: Dischargers into privately owned treatment works do not
have to apply for or obtain KPDES permits except as otherwise required by the Cabinet. The owner or operator
of the treatment works itself, however, must apply for a permit and identify all users in its application.
4.
Discharges from Agricultural and Silvicultural Activities: Most discharges from agricultural and silvicultural
activities to waters of the Commonwealth do not require KPDES permits. These include runoff from orchards,
cultivated crops, pastures, range lands, and forest lands. However, the discharge listed below DO require KPDES
permits.
a. Discharges from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
b. Discharges from Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Facilities.
c. Discharges associated with approved Aquaculture Projects.
d. Discharges from Silvicultural Point Sources. Nonpoint source silvicultural activities are excluded from
KPDES permit requirements. However, some of these activities, such as stream crossings for roads, may
involve point source discharge of dredged or fill material which may require a Section 404 permit. See 33
CFR 209.120.
Underground Injection Control Permits Under the Safe Drinking Water Act
5.
DEP 7032
3
Revised February 2009
KPDES Form F
KPDES FORM F
KENTUCKY POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
PERMIT APPLICATION
A complete application consists of this form and Form 1.
For additional information, Contact Surface Water Permits Branch, (502) 564-3410.
AGENCY USE
I. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and name the receiving water.
A. Outfall Number
S4-A4-4A
B. Latitude
N38
19'
C. Longitude
57"
W85
37'
D. Receiving Water (name)
50"
Harrods Creek
II. IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any federal, state, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction,
upgrading or operation of wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the
discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement
orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions.
1. Identification of Conditions,
Agreements, Etc.
No.
2. Affected Outfalls
Source of Discharge
3. Brief Description
of Project
4. Final Compliance Date
a. req.
b. proj.
B. You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution (or other environmental projects which may affect
your discharges) you now have under way or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now under way or planned, and
indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.
III. SITE DRAINAGE MAP
Attach a site map showing topography (or indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfall(s) covered in the application if
a topographic map is unavailable) depicting the facility including: each of its intake and discharge structures; the drainage area of each
storm water outfall; paved areas and buildings within the drainage area of each storm water outfall, each know past or present areas
used for outdoor storage or disposal of significant materials, each existing structural control measure to reduce pollutants in storm
water runoff, materials loading and access areas, areas where pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied; each
of its hazardous waste treatment, storage of disposal units (including each area not required to have a RCRA permit which is used for
accumulating hazardous waste under 40 CFR 262.34); each well where fluids from the facility are injected underground; springs, and
other surface water bodies which receive storm water discharges from the facility.
DEP 7032F
1
Revised February 2009
DEP 7032F
3
Revised February 2009
VII. DISCHARGE INFORMATION
OUTFALL NO:
Part A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for
additional details.
Maximum Values
Average Values
(include units)
(include units)
Pollutant and
Grab Sample
Grab Sample
Number of
Sources of
CAS Number
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Storm Events
Pollutants
(if available)
30 Minutes
Composite
30 Minutes
Composite
Sampled
Oil and Grease
Biological
Oxygen Demand
BOD5
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD)
Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen
Nitrate plus
Nitrite Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus
N/A
pH
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Part B - List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility’s KPDES permit for its process
wastewater (if the facility is operating under an existing KPDES permit). Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements.
Maximum Values
Average Values
(include units)
(include units)
Pollutant and
Grab Sample
Grab Sample
Number of
Sources of
CAS Number
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Storm Events
Pollutants
(if available)
30 Minutes
Composite
30 Minutes
Composite
Sampled
DEP 7032F
5
Revised February 2009
Part C - List each pollutant shown in Tables F-2, F-3, and F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements. Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values
Average Values
(include units)
(include units)
Pollutant and
Grab Sample
Grab Sample
Number of
CAS Number
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Taken During 1st
Flow-weighted
Storm Events
Sources of
(if available)
30 Minutes
Composite
30 Minutes
Composite
Sampled
Pollutants
Part D - Provide data for the storm event(s) which resulted in the maximum values for the flow-weighted composite sample.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Date of
Duration of
Total rainfall
Number of hours
Maximum flow
Storm Event
Storm Event
during storm
between beginning of
rate during
(in minutes)
event (in inches)
storm measured and
rain event
end of previous
(gal/min or
measurable rain event
specify units)
6.
Total flow from rain
event (gallons or
specify units)
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
DEP 7032F
6
Revised February 2009
KENTUCKY POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
FORM F -- INSTRUCTIONS
WHO MUST FILE FORM F
Form F must be completed by operators of facilities which discharge storm water associated with industrial activity or by operators of
storm water discharges that EPA is evaluating for designation as a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the United States, or as
contributing to a violation of a water quality standard.
Operators of discharges which are composed entirely of storm water must complete Form F (KY Form 7032-F) in conjunction with Form
1 (KY Form 7032-1).
Operators of discharges of storm water which are combined with process wastewater (process wastewater is water that comes into direct
contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, byproduct, waste product,
or wastewater) must complete and submit Form F, Form 1, and Form C (KY Form 7032-C).
Operators of discharges of storm water which are combined with nonprocess wastewater (nonprocess wastewater includes noncontact
cooling water and sanitary wastes which are not regulated by effluent guidelines or a new source performance standard, except discharges
by educational, medical, or commercial chemical laboratories) must complete Form 1, Form F, and Form SC (KY Form 7032-SC).
Operators of new sources or new discharges of storm water associated with industrial activity which will be combined with other nonstormwater new sources or new discharges must submit Form 1, Form F, and Form C or Form SC.
WHERE TO FILE APPLICATIONS
The application forms should be sent to the Kentucky Division of Water, Surface Water Permits Branch, 200 Fair Oaks Lane, Frankfort,
KY 40601. To obtain copies of the appropriate forms you can write the above address or call (502) 564-3410.
COMPLETENESS
Your application will not be considered complete unless you answer every question on this form and on Form 1. If an item does not apply
to you, enter "NA" (for not applicable) to show that you considered the question.
PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF SUBMITTED INFORMATION
You may not claim as confidential any information required by this form or Form 1, whether the information is reported on the forms or
in an attachment. Section 402(j) of the Clean Water Act requires that all permit applications will be available to the public. This
information will be made available to the public upon request.
Any information you submit to EPA which goes beyond that required by this form, Form 1, or Form C you may claim as confidential, but
claims for information which are effluent data will be denied.
If you do not assert a claim of confidentiality at the time of submitting the information, the Cabinet may make the information public
without further notice to you. Claims of confidentiality will be handled in accordance with EPA's business confidentiality regulations at
40 CFR Part 2.
DEFINITIONS
All significant terms used in these instructions and in the form are defined in the glossary found in the General Instructions which
accompany Form 1.
Item I
You may use the map you provided for item XI of Form 1 to determine the latitude and longitude of each of your outfalls and the name of
the receiving water.
Item II-A
If you check "yes" to this question, complete all parts of the chart, or attach a copy of any previous submission you have made to EPA
containing the same information.
Item II-B
You are not required to submit a description of future pollution control projects if you do not wish to or if none is planned.
DEP 7032F Instructions
1
Revised February 2009
Item III
Attach a site map showing topography (or indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfalls(s) covered in the application if a
topographic map is unavailable) depicting the facility including:
each of its drainage and discharge structures;
the drainage area of each storm water outfall;
paved areas and building(s) within the drainage area of each storm water outfall, each known past or present areas used for
outdoor storage or disposal of significant materials, each existing structural control measure to reduce pollutants in storm water
runoff, materials loading and access areas, areas where pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied;
each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities (including each area not required to have a RCRA permit
which is used for accumulating hazardous waste for less than 90 days under 40 CFR 262.34);
each well where fluids from the facility are injected underground; and
springs, and other surface water bodies which receive storm water discharges from the facility;
Item IV-A
For each outfall, provide an estimate of the area drained by the outfall which is covered by impervious surfaces. For the purpose of this
application, impervious surfaces are surfaces where storm water runs off at rates that are significantly higher than background rates (e.g.
predevelopment levels) and include paved areas, building roofs, parking lots, and roadways. Include an estimate of the total area
(including all impervious and pervious areas) drained by each outfall. The site map required under item III can be used to estimate the
total area drained by each outfall.
Item IV-B
Provide a narrative description of significant materials that are currently or in the past three years have been treated, stored, or disposed in
a manner to allow exposure to storm water; method of treatment, storage or disposal of these materials; past and present materials
management practices employed, in the last three years, to minimize contact by these materials with storm water runoff; materials loading
and access areas; and the location, manner, and frequency in which pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners, and fertilizers are applied.
Significant materials should be identified by chemical name, form (e.g. powder, liquid, etc.), and type of container or treatment unit.
Indicate any materials treated, stored, or disposed of together. "Significant materials" includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels;
materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food
processing or production; hazardous substances designated under Section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to
report pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the
potential to be released with storm water discharges.
Item IV-C
For each outfall, structural controls include structures which enclose material handling or storage areas, covering materials, berms, dikes,
or diversion ditches around manufacturing, production, storage or treatment units, retention ponds, etc. Nonstructural controls include
practices such as spill prevention plans, employee training, visual inspections, preventive maintenance, and housekeeping measures that
are used to prevent or minimize the potential for releases of, pollutants.
Item V
Provide a certification that all outfalls that should contain storm water discharges associated with industrial activity have been tested or
evaluated for the presence of non-storm water discharges which are not covered by a KPDES permit. Tests for such non-storm water
discharges may include smoke tests, fluorometric dye tests, analysis of accurate schematics, as well as other appropriate tests. Part B must
include a description of the method used, the date of any testing, and the onsite drainage points that were directly observed during a test.
All non-storm water discharges must be identified in a Form C or Form SC which must accompany this application (see beginning of
instructions under section titled "Who Must File Form F" for a description of when Form C and Form SC must be submitted).
Item VI
Provide a description of existing information regarding the history of significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the
facility in the last three years.
DEP 7032F Instructions
2
Revised February 2009
Item VII-A, B, and C
These items require you to collect and report data on the pollutants discharged for each of your outfalls. Each part of this item addresses a
different set of pollutants and must be completed in accordance with the specific instructions for that part. The following general
instructions apply to the entire item.
General Instructions
Part A requires you to report at least one analysis for each pollutant listed. Parts B and C require you to report analytical data in two ways.
For some pollutants addressed in Parts B and C, if you know or have reason to know that the pollutant is present in your discharge, you
may be required to list the pollutant and test (sample and analyze) and report the levels of the pollutants in your discharge. For all other
pollutants addressed in Parts B and C, you must list the pollutant if you know or have reason to know that the pollutant is present in the
discharge, and either report quantitative data for the pollutant or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged.
(See specific instructions on the form and below for Parts A throught C.) Base your determination that a pollutant is present in or absent
from your discharge on your knowledge of your raw materials, material management practices, maintenance chemicals, history of spills
and releases, intermediate and final products and byproducts, and any previous analyses known to you of your effluent or similar effluent.
A.
Sampling: The collection of the samples for the reported analyses should be supervised by a person experienced in performing
sampling of industrial wastewater or storm water discharges. You may contact EPA or your State permitting authority for
detailed guidance on sampling techniques and for answers to specific questions. Any specific requirements contained in the
applicable analytical methods should be followed for sample containers, sample preservation, holding times, the collection of
duplicate samples, etc. The time when you sample should be representative, to the extent feasible, of your treatment system
operating properly with no system upsets. Samples should be collected from the center of the flow channel, where turbulence is
at a maximum, at a site specified in your present permit, or at any site adequate for the collection of a representative sample.
For pH, temperature, cyanide, total phenols, residual chlorine, oil and grease, fecal coliform, and E. coli, grab samples taken
during the first 30 minutes (or as soon thereafter as practicable) of the discharge must be used (you are not required to analyze a
flow-weighted composite for these parameters). For all other pollutants both a grab sample collected during the first 30 minutes
(or as soon thereafter as practicable) of the discharge and a flow-weighted composite sample must be analyzed. However, a
minimum of one grab sample may be taken for effluents from holding ponds or other impoundments with a retention period of
greater than 24 hours.
All samples shall be collected from the discharge resulting from a storm event that is greater than 0.1 inches and at least 72 hours
from the previously measurable (greater than 0.1 inch rainfall) storm event. Where feasible, the variance in the duration of the
event and the total rainfall of the event should not exceed 50 percent from the average or median rainfall event in that area.
A grab sample shall be taken during the first thirty minutes of the discharge (or as soon thereafter as practicable), and a flowweighted composite shall be taken for the entire event or for the first three hours of the event.
Grab and composite samples are defined as follows:
Grab sample: An individual sample of at least 100 milliliters collected during the first thirty minutes (or as soon thereafter as
practicable) of the discharge. This sample is to be analyzed separately from the composite sample.
Flow-weighted Composite sample: A flow-weighted composite sample may be taken with a continuous sampler that
proportions the amount of sample collected with the flow rate or as a combination of a minimum of three sample aliquots taken
in each hour of discharge for the entire event or for the first three hours of the event, with each aliquot being at least 100
milliliters and collected with a minimum period of fifteen minutes between aliquot collections. The composite must be flow
proportional; either the time interval between each aliquot or the volume of each aliquot must be proportional to either the
stream flow at the time of sampling or the total stream flow since the collection of the previous aliquot. Aliquots may be
collected manually or automatically. Where GC/MS Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) is required, aliquots must be combined in
the laboratory immediately before anlaysis. Only one analysis for the composite sample is required.
Data from samples taken in the past may be used, provided that:
All data requirements are met;
Sampling was done no more than three years before submission; and
All data are representative of the present discharge.
DEP 7032F Instructions
3
Revised February 2009
Among the factors which would cause the data to be unrepresentative are significant changes in production level, changes in raw
materials, processes, or final products, and changes in storm water treatment. When the Agency promulgates new analytical
methods in 40 CFR Part 136, EPA will provide information as to when you should use the new methods to generate data on your
discharges. Of course, the Cabinet may request additional information, including current quantitative data, if they determine it to
be necessary to assess your discharges. The Cabinet may allow or establish appropriate site-specific sampling procedures or
requirements, including sampling locations, the season in which the sampling takes place, the minimum duration between the
previous measurable storm event and the storm event sampled, the minimum or maximum level of precipitation required for an
appropriate storm event, the form of precipitation sampled (snow melt or rainfall), protocols for collecting samples under 40
CFR Part 136, and additional time for submitting data on a case-by-case basis.
B.
Reporting: All levels must be reported as concentration and mass (note: grab samples are reported in terms of concentration).
You may report some or all of the required data by attaching separate sheets of paper instead of filling out pages VII-1 and VII-2
if the separate sheets contain all the required information in a format which is constant with pages VII-1 and VII-2 in spacing
and identification of pollutants and columns. Use the following abbreviations in the columns headed "Units."
ppm
Concentration
parts per million
lbs
Mass
pounds
mg/l
milligrams per liter
ton
tons (English tons)
ppb
parts per billion
mg
milligrams
µg/l
micrograms per liter
g
grams
kg
kilograms
T
tonnes (metric tons)
All reporting of values for metals must be in terms of "total recoverable metal," unless:
(1) An applicable, promulgated effluent limitation or standard specifies the limitation for the metal in dissolved, valent, or total
form; or
(2) All approved analytical methods for the metal inherently measure only its dissolved form (e.g., hexavalent chromium); or
(3) The permitting authority has determined that in establishing case-by-case limitations it is necessary to express the limitations
on the metal in dissolved, valent, or total form to carry out the provisions of the CWA. If you measure only one grab sample and
one flow-weighted composite sample for a given outfall, complete only the "Maximum Values" columns and insert "1" into the
"Number of Storm Events Sampled" column. The permitting authority may require you to conduct additional analyses to further
characterize your discharges.
If you measure more than one value for a grab sample or a flow-weighted composite sample for a given outfall and those values
are representative of your discharge, you must report them. You must describe your method of testing and data analysis. You
also must determine the average of all values within the last year and report the concentration and mass under the "Average
Values" columns, and the total number of storm events sampled under the "Number of Storm Events Sampled" columns.
C.
Analysis: You must use test methods promulgated in 40 CFR Part 136: however, if none has been promulgated for a particular
pollutant, you may use any suitable method for measuring the level of the pollutant in your discharge provided that you submit a
description of the method or a reference to a published method. Your description should include the sample holding time,
preservation techniques, and the quality control measures which you used. If you have two or more substantially identical
outfalls, you may request permission from your permitting authority to sample and analyze only one outfall and submit the
results of the analysis for other substantially identical outfalls. If your request is granted by the permitting authority, on a
separate sheet attached to the application form, identify which outfall you did test, and describe why the outfalls which you did
not test are substantially identical to the outfall which you did test.
Part VII-A
Part VII-A must be completed by all applicants who must complete Form F for all outfalls.
Analyze a grab sample collected during the first thirty minutes (or as soon thereafter as practicable) of the discharge and flow-weighted
composite samples for all pollutants in this part, and report the results except use only grab samples for pH and oil and grease. See
discussion in General Instructions to Item VII for definitions of grab sample collected during the first thirty minutes of discharge and
flow-weighted composite sample. The "Average Values" column is not compulsory but should be filled out if data are available.
DEP 7032F Instructions
4
Revised February 2009
Part VII-B
List all pollutants that are limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to (see 40 CFR Chaper I, Subchapter N to determine
which pollutants are limited in effluent guidelines) or any pollutant listed in the facility's KPDES permit for its process wastewater (if the
facility is operating under an existing KPDES permit). Complete one table for each outfall. See discussion in General Instructions to Item
VII for definitions of grab sample collected during the first thirty minutes (or as soon thereafter as practicable) of discharge and flowweighted composite sample. The "Average Values" column is not compulsory but should be filled out if data are available.
Analyze a grab sample collected during the first thirty minutes of the discharge and flow-weighted composite samples for all pollutants in
this part, and report the results, except as provided in the General Instructions.
Part VII-C
Part VII-C must be completed by all applicants for all outfalls which discharge storm water associated with industrial activity, or that the
Cabinet has designated as a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the Commonwealth, or as contributing to a violation of a
water quality standard. Use both a grab sample and a composite sample for all pollutants you analyze for in this part except use grab
samples for residual chlorine and fecal coliform. The "Average Values" column is not compulsory but should be filled out if data are
available. Part C requires you to address the pollutants in Table F-2, F-3, and F-4 for each outfall. Pollutants in each of these tables are
addressed differently.
Table F-2: For each outfall, list all pollutants in Table F-2 that you know or have reason to believe are discharged (except pollutants
previously listed in Part VII-B). If a pollutant is limited in an effluent guideline limitation which the facility is subject to, the pollutant
must be analyzed and reported in Part VII-B. If a pollutant in Table F-2 is indirectly limited by an effluent guideline limitation through an
indicator (e.g., use of TSS as an indicator to control the discharge of iron and aluminum), you must analyze for it and report the data in
Part VII-B. For other pollutants listed in Table F-2 (those not limited directly or indirectly by an effluent limitation guideline), that you
know or have reason to believe are discharged, you must either report quantitative data or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is
expected to be discharged.
Table F-3: For each outfall, list all pollutants in Table F-3 that you know or have reason to believe are discharged. For every pollutant in
Table F-3 expected to be discharged in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater, you must submit quantitative data. For acrolein, acrylonitrile,
2,4 dinitrophenol, and 2-methyl-4,6 dinitrophenol, you must submit quantitative data if any of these four pollutants is expected to be
discharged in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. For every pollutant expected to be discharged in concentrations less than 10 ppb (or
100 ppb for the four pollutants listed above), then you must either submit quantitative data or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is
expected to be discharged.
Small Business Exemption - If you are a "small business," you are exempt from the reporting requirements for the organic toxic
pollutants listed in Table F-3. There are two ways in which you can qualify as a "small business". If your facility is a coal mine, and if
your probable total annual production is less than 100,000 tons per year, you may submit past production data or estimated future
production (such as a schedule of estimated total production under 30 CFR 795.14(c)) instead of conducting analyses for the organic toxic
pollutants. If your facility is not a coal mine, and if your gross total annual sales for the most recent three years average less than $100,000
per year (in second quarter 1980 dollars), you may submit sales data for those years instead of conducting analyses for the organic toxic
pollutants. The production or sales data must be for the facility which is the source of the discharge. The data should not be limited to
production or sales for the process or processes which contribute to the discharge, unless those are the only processes at your facility. For
sales data, in situations involving intracorporate transfer of goods and services, the transfer price per unit should approximate market
prices for those goods and services as closely as possible. Sales figures for years after 1980 should be indexed to the second quarter of
1980 by using the gross national product price deflator (second quarter of 1980=100). This index is available in National Income and
Product Accounts of the United States (Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis).
Table F-4: For each outfall, list any pollutant in Table F-4 that you know or believe to be present in the discharge and explain why you
believe it to be present. No analysis is required, but if you have analytical data, you must report them. Note: Under 40 CFR 117.12(a)(2),
certain discharges of hazardous substances which establishes reporting requirements, civil penalties, and liability for cleanup costs for
spills of oil and hazardous substances. A discharge of a particular substance may be exempted if the origin, source, and amount of the
discharged substances are identified in the KPDES permit application or in the permit, if the permit contains a requirement for treatment
of the discharge, and if the treatment is in place. To apply for an exclusion of the discharge of any hazardous substance from the
requirements of Clean Water Act Section 311, attach additional sheets of paper to your form, setting forth the following information:
DEP 7032F Instructions
5
Revised February 2009
1.
The substance and the amount of each substance which may be discharged.
2.
The origin and source of the discharge of the substance.
3.
The treatment which is to be provided for the discharge by:
a.
An onsite treatment system separate from any treatment system treating your normal discharge;
b.
A treatment system designed to treat your normal discharge and which is additionally capable of treating the
amount of the substance identified under paragraph 1 above; or
c.
Any combination of the above.
See 40 CFR 117.12(a)(2) and (c), published on August 29, 1979, in 44 FR 50766, for further information on exclusions from Section 311.
Part VII-D
If sampling is conducted during more than one storm event, you only need to report the information requested in Part VII-D for the storm
events which resulted in any maximum pollutant concentration reported in Part VII-A, VII-B, VII-C.
Provide flow measurements or estimates of the flow rate, and the total amount of discharge for the storm events sampled, the method of
flow measurement, or estimation. Provide the data and duration of the storm events sampled, rainfall measurements, or estimates of the
storm event which generated the sampled runoff and the duration between the storm event sampled and the end of the previous
measurable (greater than 0.1 inch rainfall) storm event.
Part VII-E
List any toxic pollutant listed in Tables F-2, F-3, or F-4 which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or
byproduct. In addition, if you know or have reason to believe that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is discharged or if you use
or manufacture 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4,5,-T); 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid (silvex,2,4,5,-TP); 2-(2,4,5trichlorophenoxy) ethyl, 2,2-dichloropropionate (erbon); O,O-dimethyl O-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl) phosphorothioate (Ronnel); 2,4,5trichlorophenol (TCP); or hexachlorophene (HCP); then list TCDD. The Cabinet may waive or modify the requirement if you
demonstrate that it would be unduly burdensome to identify each toxic pollutant and the Cabinet has adequate information to issue your
permit. You may not claim this information as confidential; however, you do not have to distinguish between use or production of the
pollutants or list the amounts.
Item VIII
Self explanatory. The permitting authority may ask you to provide additional details after your application is received.
Item X
KRS Chapter 224 provides for severe penalties for submiting false information on this application form.
This section must be signed in accordance with the requirements in 401 KAR 5:060.
DEP 7032F Instructions
6
Revised February 2009
TABLE F-1
CODES FOR TREATMENT UNITS
1-A
1-B
1-C
1-D
1-E
1-F
1-G
1-H
1-I
1-J
1-K
1-L
Ammonia Stripping
Dialysis
Diatomaceous Earth Filtration
Distillation
Electrodialysis
Evaporation
Flocculation
Flotation
Foam Fractionation
Freezing
Gas-Phase Separation
Grinding (Comminutors)
Physical Treatment Processes
1-M
1-N
1-O
1-P
1-Q
1-R
1-S
1-T
1-U
1-V
1-W
1-X
Grit Removal
Microstraining
Mixing
Moving Bed Filters
Multimedia Filtration
Rapid Sand Filtration
Reverse Osmosis (Hyperfiltration)
Screening
Sedimentation (Settling)
Slow Sand Filtration
Solvent Extraction
Sorption
2-A
2-B
2-C
2-D
2-E
2-F
Carbon Adsorption
Chemical Oxidation
Chemical Precipitation
Coagulation
Dechlorination
Disinfection (Chlorine)
Chemical Treatment Processes
2-G
2-H
2-I
2-J
2-K
2-L
Disinfection (Ozone)
Disinfection (Other)
Electrochemical Treatment
Ion Exchange
Neutralization
Reduction
3-A
3-B
3-C
3-D
Activated Sludge
Aerated Lagoons
Anaerobic Treatment
Nitrification-Denitrification
Biological Treatment Processes
3-E
3-F
3-G
3-H
Pre-Aeration
Spray Irrigation/Land Application
Stabilization Ponds
Trickling Filtration
4-A
4-B
Discharge to Surface Water
Ocean Discharge Through Outfall
5-A
5-B
5-C
5-D
5-E
5-F
5-G
5-H
5-I
5-J
5-K
5-L
Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion
Belt Filtration
Centrifugation
Chemical Conditioning
Chlorine Treatment
Composting
Drying Beds
Elutriation
Flotation Thickening
Freezing
Gravity Thickening
Other Processes
DEP 7032F Instructions
4-C
4-D
Sludge Treatment and Disposal Processes
5-M
5-N
5-O
5-P
5-Q
5-R
5-S
5-T
5-U
5-V
5-W
7
Reuse/Recycle of Treated Effluent
Underground Injection
Heat Drying
Heat Treatment
Incineration
Land Application
Landfill
Pressure Filtration
Pyrolysis
Sludge Lagoons
Vacuum Filtration
Vibration
Wet Oxidation
Revised February 2009
TABLE F-2
CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
Bromide
Chlorine, Total Residual
Color
Fecal Coliform
Fluoride
Nitrate-Nitrite
Nitrogen, Total Organic
Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Radioactivity
Sulfate
Sulfite
Surfactants
Aluminum, Total
Barium, Total
Boron, Total
Cobalt, Total
Iron, Total
Magnesium, Total
Molybdenum, Total
Manganese, Total
Tin, Total
Titanium, Total
DEP 7032F Instructions
8
Revised February 2009
TABLE F-3
TOXIC POLLUTANTS AND PHENOLS
TOXIC POLLUTANTS AND TOTAL PHENOL
Antimony, Total
Copper, Total
Silver, Total
Arsenic, Total
Lead, Total
Thallium, Total
Beryllium, Total
Mercury, Total
Zinc, Total
Cadmium, Total
Nickel, Total
Cyanide, Total
Chromium, Total
Selenium, Total
Phenols, Total
GC/MS FRACTION VOLATILES COMPOUNDS
Acrolein
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane
Acrylonitrile
1,1-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Toluene
Bromoform
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Chlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Chlorodibromomethane
Ethylbenzene
Trichloroethylene
Chloroethane
Methyl Bromide
Vinyl Chloride
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
Methyl Chloride
Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
ACID COMPOUNDS
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
Phenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-O-Cresol
p-Chloro-M-Cresol
2-methyl-4,6 dinitrophenol
DEP 7032F Instructions
9
Revised February 2009
TABLE F-3 (Continued)
BASE/NEUTRAL
Acenaphthene
2-Chloronaphthalene
Fluroanthene
Acenaphthylene
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
Fluorene
Anthracene
Chrysene
Hexachlorobenzene
Benzidine
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Benzo(a)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Benzo(a)pyrene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Isophorone
Benzo(ghi)perylene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Napthalene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Diethyl Phthalate
Nitrobenzene
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Dimethyl Phthalate
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
N-Nitrosodi-N-Propylamine
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Bis(2-ethylyhexyl)phthalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Phenanthrene
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
Di-N-Octylphthalate
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl Phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as
Azobenzene)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
PESTICIDES
Aldrin
Dieldrin
PCB-1254
Alpha-BHC
Alpha-Endosulfan
PCB-1221
Beta-BHC
Beta-Endosulfan
PCB-1232
Gamma-BHC
Endosulfan Sulfate
PCB-1248
Delta-BHC
Endrin
PCB-1260
Chlordane
Endrin Aldehyde
PCB-1016
4,4'-DDT
Heptachlor
Toxaphene
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor Epoxide
4,4'-DDD
PCB-1242
DEP 7032F Instructions
10
Revised February 2009
TABLE F-4
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Toxic Pollutant
Asbestos
Hazardous Substances
Kelthane
Kepone
Malathion
Mercaptodimethur
Methoxychlor
Methyl mercaptan
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl parathion
Mevinphos
Mexacarbate
Monoethyl amine
Monomethyl amine
Naled
Napthenic acid
Nitrotolune
Parathion
Phenolsulfonate
Phosgene
Propargite
Propylene oxide
Pyrethrins
Quinoline
Resorcinol
Stronthium
Strychnine
Styrene
2,4,5-^ (2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
TDE (Tetrachlorodiphenyl ethane)
2,4,5-TP [2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy) propanoic
acid]
Trichlorofan
Triethylamine
Trimethylamine
Uranium
Vanadium
Vinyl Acetate
Xylene
Xylenol
Acetaldehyde
Allyl alcohol
Allyl chloride
Amyl acetate
Aniline
Benzonitrile
Benzyl chloride
Butyl acetate
Butylamine
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbon disulfide
Chlorpyrifos
Coumaphos
Cresol
Crotonaldehyde
Cyclohexane
2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlobenil
Dichlone
2,2-Dichloropropionic acid
Dichlorvos
Diethyl amine
Dimethyl amine
Dinitrobenzene
Diquat
Disulfoton
Diuron
Epichlorohydrin
Ethion
Ethylene Diamine
Ethylene Dibromide
Formaldehyde
Furfural
Guthion
Isoprene
Isopropanolamine
DEP 7032F Instructions
11
Revised February 2009
Attachment 1 - Location Map
Location of
Outfall S4-A4-4A
1 mile radius
Facility Location
Outfall S4-A4-4A
East End Crossing
Ohio River Bridges Project - Sections
4&5
Prospect, Jefferson County,
Kentucky
Attachment 2 - Vicinity Map
LOCATION OF DESIGN SECTIONS 4A, 4B, AND 5
EAST END BRIDGE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES
LOUISVILLE - SOUTHERN INDIANA OHIO RIVER BRIDGES
PROJECT (LSIORBP)
1.
51
SECTION
5
i
n
2.
56
SECTION 4B
in
9.3
SECTION
4A
2
in
Attachment 3 - Correspondence
Attachment 3.1
Louisville Water Company concurrence on
proposed stormwater system in the WHPA
SUBMITTAL REPLY FORM
TO:
WVB East End Partners
9300 Shelbyville Road, Suite 300
Louisville, KY 40222
502 498-8873 office
ATTENTION:
Ron Huestis
Andy Barber
PROJECT:
Ohio River Bridges Project
SUBMITTAL:
WVC D3.03 RPT 4. ALL DRN 10001
Stormwater Drainage System in Wellhead Protection Area
CH2M HILL IS TAKING THE FOLLOWING ACTION ON THIS SUBMITTAL ON
BEHALF OF LOUISVILLE WATER COMPANY:
See summary of submittal review responses in bold below. The overall disposition for
this submittal reply is “Approved As Noted”.
CH2M HILL, on behalf of the Louisville Water Company would also like to convey
appreciation for the additional information provided in this document. The overarching
principal regarding the information contained in this submittal is to protect the source
water in and around the east end bridges infrastructure. Our primary concern is the
water quality in the well head protection area. Thus the majority of our comments
provided below are focused on the conveyance and treatment of any stormwater or
potential sources of contamination leaving the bridge infrastructure.
The Louisville Water Company would appreciate the treatment system O&M manual
and any associated guidance with the treatment facilities in and around the shared
area.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation with these remaining items.
CC:
Kay Ball
Spencer Bruce
Page 1 of 6
Final Design of Stormwater Drainage System in WHPA
Summary of Responses to LWC Comments
LSIORB Project East End Crossing
Note: Page references are to the document WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001 Stormwater
Drainage System in Wellhead Protection Area as submitted to LWC by Third Rock Consultants on
September 30, 2014.
1. The table of Hydraulic Design Criteria is illegible. Please replace.
The table has been replaced in the attached Final Design documentation.
Approved. Hydraulic Design Criteria table resubmitted is clear and legible.
2. The paragraph Additional Drainage Calculations indicates that the drainage system shall
have the capacity to capture and carry the 100-year, 1-hour storm away without
overflow into the WHPA. Please clarify this volume and what facilities in the deck
drainage system are counted as the holding volume. Provide calculations.
Clarification and calculations are provided in the attached Final Design documentation.
Approved. Calculations and supporting documentation (HEC-HMS model output)
are provided in Appendix E of the submittal package.
3. This is a partial set of drawings. Please submit Index for all drawings.
An index is included in the attached Final Design documentation.
Approved. Partial set of drawings submitted because the rest of the drawings do
not pertain to the Stormwater Drainage System in the WHPA. Full drawing index
has been provided in submittal package.
4. Where is the design for the ditch that is receiving the 66” RCP stormwater discharge?
Outfall design is provided for in the landscape design and includes depressed areas as well
as blasted limestone rock fill for energy dissipation. A copy of the landscape plan is
included on page 32 in the attached Final Design documentation depicting the discharge
ditch.
Approved. Landscaping design drawings included in submittal package show the
design of the ditch receiving 66” RCP discharge.
5. Page 53 of 61 states that the runoff from the roadway north of the Harrods Creek Bridge
will be discharged into Pond A or B without any direct roadway runoff to the WHPA. It
appears on sheet 35 that a section of the GREEN system that runs along River Road and a
short segment of the Emergency Access Road bypasses both ponds and discharges directly
to Harrods Creek without treatment, which violates Requirement 1. If correct, please
reconfigure to provide pond treatment.
Page 2 of 6
The roadway referenced on page 53 of 61 is KY 841 main line and does not include River
Road or the emergency access road. Requirement 1 is a requirement for the drainage
design for KY 841.
Approved as noted.
6. For the drainage section outlined in PINK, it appears that all runoff is routed directly to
Middleton Run Creek without treatment. Middleton Run Creek is located between Sta.
147+00 and 159+00, which is in the WHPA, according to page 5 of 61 of the Memo. If
correct, please reconfigure to provide pond treatment.
Treatment is required for all runoff from the roadway, which is KY 841. Roadway runoff is
not directed to Middleton Run Creek, which is conveying the creek from the east to west
side of the right-of-way under KY 841.
Approved. The original concern about runoff being routed to the Middleton Run
Creek has been clarified in the note above. The clarification was helpful and no
further discussion is required.
7. The Memo states that the current proposed SWTB can handle 32.17 CFS, but the bypass
structure is designed to divert flows so the flowrate through the SWTB does not exceed
34 CFS. Verify that the SWTB has adequate capacity.
The SWTB has a capacity of 34 cfs. The Memo was intended to state that 32.17 cfs is the
site specific design criteria for the box.
Approved as noted. However, it doesn’t appear that the wording has been
changed in the memo to clarify. Please provide this clarification and a copy of
the revised memo.
8. How is the SWTB cleaned (settled material and floatable material) after a rain event or
spill? Please confirm that all runoff will be captured and floatables separated for this
section, since the Memo states that any flow in excess of 34 CFS will bypass the SWTB
and flow directly to Harrods Creek.
The treatment structure will be monitored and cleaned as necessary based on sediment
levels or spills per the Operation Manual requirements. KYTC District 5 Maintenance will
inspect and clean the SWTB on a regular basis, and in the event of spill. Only
uncontaminated water will be discharged from the bottom of the SWTB. All runoff is
captured in the storm sewer system or ditches and, as stated in the memo, the EPA
considers subsequent runoff after the first flush to be “cleansed”. In the event of a spill,
an automatic valve will be installed in place of the manual valve which can be closed
quickly by emergency responders to prevent spill from being discharged out of the
system. Operations and maintenance of the SWTB and the automatic valve will be
included in the Emergency Response Plan and Operations Manual for the Tunnel. A copy
of the manual will be provided to LWC when complete.
Approved per discussion in 1-30-15 meeting.
Page 3 of 6
9. The SWTB only holds 1,009 gallons. To meet the requirement to contain 26,000 gallons,
the Memo indicates that a manual valve would be closed to gain the holding volume of
66” upstream pipes. Who realistically would close the manual valve during a storm
event? What is the process for dealing with a spill after the manual control gate has
been closed and the pipe network is used for storage? This is not a viable configuration.
We recommend a holding pond for the south side of Harrods Creek.
An automatic valve will be provided in lieu of the manual valve and will be closed by the
emergency responder when required due to an incident. The current system will contain
in excess of the 26,000 gallon requirement with the valve closed. In the event of a spill
during a storm event, there is sufficient storage in the system to contain the spill and the
run-off. A secondary pipe will be provided to drain the SWTB of uncontaminated water
from the bottom of the SWTB. The contaminated fluid will be pumped out by vacuum
trucks and treated as appropriate after an incident. KYTC will provide operations and
maintenance on the SWTB and associated valves. Trimarc, under contract with KYTC, will
monitor the SCADA system for any emergency situations affecting drainage to the SWTB
and will operate the automatic valve via the SCADA system. In the event of a spill,
Trimarc will notify emergency responders and follow the Emergency Response Plan and
Operations Manual to have the contaminated fluid pumped out by vacuum trucks
following the event.
Approved per discussion in 1-30-15 meeting.
10. The memo states that water will be discharged from the ponds into the outlet pipe, and
the skimmed materials will remain in the pond. Will all floatables remain in the pond
indefinitely? What measures are planned for cleaning floatables, trash, and debris, and
maintaining aesthetics?
Ponds will be cleaned as necessary based on sediment levels or spills per the Operation
Manual requirements.
Approved. Agreement shall be made as to how and when the ponds will be
cleaned before the completion of the project.
11. Explain the gasket material of the 66” pipe that will be used as holding possible spill.
Oil resistant rubber gaskets will be used as recommended by the reinforced concrete
pipe manufacturer.
Approved. Please provide information relating to gasket material prior to
installation. Contractor shall verify that gaskets for the 66” pipe have a high
resistance to petroleum and other contaminants when for used for containment
of polluted water in the event of a spill.
Page 4 of 6
12. Provide type of liner used in the ponds.
The ponds will be lined with a geo-membrane overlaid by loamy soil to promote
vegetation.
Approved. Contractor shall be certain that the geo-membrane material will be
resistant to possible chemicals that may be contained in the pond. Please note
that the guiding principal for this question is intended to keep any
contaminated water from entering the groundwater in the WHPA.
Questions from 1-30-15 Meeting at LWC
1. What are the design details for the automated valve as well as the communication
protocol for the operating team?
Approved as noted. Communication protocol is acceptable per response to
comment 9 above. Please provide details on the design of the valve.
2. How often will the automated valve be exercised?
Approved as noted. Please provide manual referenced in response to comment
8 above, when complete.
3. Will a standard operating procedure be in place for both maintenance and operation of
the valve?
Approved as noted. Provide manual as noted above in comment 8.
4. How frequently will the storm water treatment box be serviced? Are there standard
operating procedures for cleaning and maintaining the treatment box?
The treatment structure will be monitored and cleaned as necessary based on
sediment level or spills per the operation manual requirements, as noted above
in the response to comment 8.
5. Is the lower drain on the treatment box necessary for operations?
Approved as noted. Please address valve use in the manual referenced in
comment 8.
6. What type of gasket material will be used in the drain piping? And is it compatible with a
large array of chemicals?
Approved as noted. The response above states that the gasket will be oil
resistant, but the material is not provided in comment 11. Please provide the
reference material for the type of gasket prior to installation. Please note that
the guiding principal for this question is intended to keep any contaminated
water from entering the groundwater in the WHPA.
Page 5 of 6
7. What is the allowable leakage per the manufacturer for this gasket material?
Approved as noted. Please provide the requested information also related to
comment 11. Please note that the comment intent for this question is also to
ensure water carried in the pipe does not leak out or impact the groundwater in
the WHPA.
8. What is the liner material being proposed to line the retention ponds?
Approved as noted. It was stated in the response to comment 12 above that
the liner material will be a geo-membrane material. The intent for this
comment is the same as noted above regarding the wellhead protection area.
END OF COMMENTS
Page 6 of 6
Attachment 3.2
Kentucky Division of Water concurrence on
proposed stormwater system in the WHPA
Attachment 3.3
Agency correspondence accompanying
concurrences
Indiana Finance Authority
Indiana Department of Transportation
Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project
East End Crossing
February 5, 2014
Mr. Jeffrey Schmidt, P.E.
FHWA Project Manager – Ohio River Bridges Project
RE:
Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project
East End Crossing – Section 4
Stormwater Drainage System, Louisville Water Company Wellhead Protection Area
Jefferson County, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
Thank you for your response dated January 21, 2014 to the INDOT request for FHWA concurrence that a
proposed open storm drainage system within the Louisville Water Company (LWC) Wellhead Protection
Area (WHPA) meets the intent of the Revised Record of Decision (RROD) to make efforts to prevent
roadway pollutants from entering the WHPA and to contain runoff prior to being released into Harrods
Creek.
In response to your request for additional information we provide the following discussion of the bullet
points in your letter:
•
Discuss the benefits or advantages of using the open system versus the vault system as described in
the RROD.
o Either a vault system or an open system can be utilized to prevent roadway pollutants from
entering the WHPA. However, an open drainage system has advantages over a closed system
that will make the system more effective in preventing pollutants from entering the WHPA and
Harrods Creek. These advantages are achieved during the operations and maintenance of the
system post-construction and include:
 Visibility of the system from the roadway for operations personnel to
quickly check the condition and level of water in the system,
 Ease of access for maintenance of the open ponds and associated outlet
controls, and
 Quicker access for removal of hazardous materials, should a spill occur on
the bridge or roadway.
•
Discuss any federal, state or local permits that are required based on the open system versus the
vault system.
o There are no differences in permit requirements between an open and vault system. Either type
system will require a Section 402 permit. The final design of the drainage system, whether open
or vault, will be submitted to the Kentucky Department of Water (KDOW) and LWC for
concurrence.
•
Discuss how context sensitive solutions in the design of the open system will be used to complement
the surrounding historic properties and will be in keeping with the LSIORB First Amended [106] MOA,
IFA Ref: 1-239
Ohio River Bridges – East End Crossing Project Office
Page 1 of 2
1302 Port Rd, Jeffersonville, IN 47130
812-202-4077
dated March 23, 2012 and its resulting Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) for the Country Estates of
River Road/River Road Corridor.
o Neither a vault nor open system will be visible from surrounding historic properties. The system
will be hidden from view from River Road and the Rosewell Estate by contour grading and
landscaping. Please see attached Exhibit “A” showing how the sight lines from River Road and
Rosewell are screened by the berms creating the ponds of an open system. Also included in
Exhibit “A” are pages from the Aesthetic and Landscape Concept Master Plan, as submitted by
WVB East End Partners, showing how landscape plantings will be used to screen views of the
ponds. INDOT believes that either a vault or an open system will be fully in keeping with the
SFEIS, RROD, the LSIORB First Amended [106] MOA and the resulting Historic Preservation Plan
(HPP) for the Country Estates of River Road/River Road Corridor.
•
Discuss any visual or other effects on the surrounding historic properties.
o The open system is fully contained within project right of way, and neither an open nor vault
system will be visible from surrounding historic properties. Therefore there will not be any
effect on the surrounding historic properties. See discussion above and Exhibit “A”.
•
Discuss whether there are any effects on 4(f) properties.
o The open system is fully contained within project right of way, and neither an open nor vault
system will be visible from 4(f) properties, therefore there will not be any effects on 4(f)
properties. See previous discussion and Exhibit “A”.
•
Consult with the Bi-State Historic Consultation Team and obtain their views/recommendations for
the open system concept.
o The materials provided in Exhibit “A” were discussed with the BSHCT on January 28, 2014 and
their comments and recommendations regarding viewsheds will be solicited and addressed in
relation to stipulation II.M.2 of the First Amended [106] MOA.
Based on the additional information provided herein, INDOT beleives an open drainage system meets
the intent of the RROD and is requesting FHWA concurrence, with the understanding that KDOW and
LWC must concur with the final design.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Ronald Heustis, P.E.
INDOT Senior Project Manager and IFA Authorized Representative
Cc:
Kevin Hetrick, Brian Shaw, Steve Nicaise, file
Attachment (1)
Page 2 of 2
Indiana Finance Authority
Indiana Department of Transportation
Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project
East End Crossing
January 13, 2014
Mr. Jeffrey Schmidt, P.E.
FHWA Project Manager – Ohio River Bridges Project
RE:
Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project
East End Crossing – Section 4
Stormwater Drainage System, Louisville Water Company Wellhead Protection Area
Jefferson County, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
During development of the Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement (SFEIS) for the Bridges
Project, a coordination meeting was held on March 5, 2009 with the Louisville Water Company (LWC)
and Kentucky Department of Water (KDOW) to discuss the proposed design of the stormwater drainage
system within the LWC Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). To prevent roadway runoff pollutants from
entering the WHPA, the drainage system proposed at that time would direct all runoff into an
underground vault system for containment and removal of floatable materials prior to releasing the
runoff into Harrods Creek. The concept was considered reasonable and acceptable by both LWC and
KDOW and it was agreed that the final design of the drainage system would be submitted to LWC and
KDOW for review and approval.
The SFEIS was approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on April 20, 2012 and in June of
2012 a Revised Record of Decision (RROD) was issued by the FHWA, in consultation with the Indiana
Department of Transportation (INDOT) and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC). The RROD
documents the decision to approve the Modified Selected Alternative as proposed in the SFEIS. The
commitments for the proposed underground vault design of the stormwater drainage system within the
WHPA were carried forward and included as part of the RROD.
Concurrent with the drafting of the SFEIS and RROD, INDOT continued discussions with LWC regarding
the stormwater drainage system within the WHPA. Subsequent to the SFEIS, LWC stated in a meeting on
May 10, 2012 (minutes attached) that they did not have a requirement or preference for a buried
chamber (closed vault) over an open ditch drainage system, provided the ditch was lined to prevent
infiltration and included outfall controls. In a subsequent letter dated March 19, 2013 (attached), LWC
refers to the Technical Provisions of the East End Crossing P3 contract (relevant section attached) as the
requirements for discharge of runoff to Harrods Creek. The Provisions include options for either a closed
or open system. The understanding with LWC at the time was that LWC and KDOW would retain
approval of the final design of the stormwater drainage system within the WHPA.
IFA Ref: 1-227
Ohio River Bridges – East End Crossing Project Office
Page 1 of 2
1302 Port Rd, Jeffersonville, IN 47130
812-202-4077
Subsequent to the issuance of the RROD and the award of the East End Crossing P3 procurement to
WVB East End Partners (WVB), IFA requested and received concurrence with an open stormwater
drainage system within the WHPA from KDOW in a letter dated January 6, 2014 (attached). KYTC has
also provided their concurrence in a letter dated November 15, 2013 (attached).
The design of the stormwater drainage system within the WHPA has been advanced by WVB through
preliminary engineering and an open system is being proposed that will be effective in prevention of
roadway runoff pollutants entering the WHPA. The proposed system will contain and treat all roadway
and bridge runoff prior to discharge into Harrods Creek. The system will convey and collect runoff in two
ponds, with the ditches and ponds being constructed with impermeable liners extending a minimum of
1-foot beyond the top of bank, along the northeast side of the proposed roadway between River Road
and the Ohio River. The proposed surface ponds, A and B, will replace the sub-surface storage vaults.
Surface Pond B is connected to Surface Pond A via a below ground 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe
(RCP). Surface Pond A discharges to Harrods Creek via a 36-inch below ground RCP, south of River Road.
Any floating materials will be separated and removed prior to stormwater discharge into Harrods Creek.
The drainage system will also contain a minimum 26,000 gallon spill and will include a manual control at
the discharge point as an additional control measure to prevent any of the spill material from entering
Harrods Creek. A copy of the proposed drainage system in the WHPA is attached showing the location
of Surface Ponds A and B.
Based on the information provided, INDOT beleives the proposed open drainage system meets the
intent of the RROD and is requesting FHWA concurrence, with the understanding that KDOW and LWC
will retain approval of the final design.
Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Ronald Heustis, P.E.
INDOT Senior Project Manager and IFA Authorized Representative
Cc:
Kevin Hetrick, Brian Shaw, Steve Nicaise, file
Page 2 of 2
Attachment 4
Design Documentation & Drainage Maps
1
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES
WV B East End Partners
—
EAST END CROSSING
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES
KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA
DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
This document is applicable to :
WVB East End Partners (WVB)
✓
Walsh Vinci Construction Joint Venture (WVC)
✓
Jacobs and Designers
Subcontractors and suppliers
author to insert date only when
check or approval is obtained
Reviewed
Authorized
Originator
May 26, 2014
C
Clement
thor
WVC
Date
Name
Review within
WVB
Gina Morris
Third Rock
Robert Morphonios
WVB
,
(
D
3
0
Strategic
Process
3 R P T
Document
Type
4 A L L
DRN
Area . Design
Unit
Discipline
1
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
0 0 0
Document
Number
1
R -
0 2
Status
Rev
WV B East End Partners
I
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Review by others (add
rows if required)
Doc n°: WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
Rev.
June 25,2014
Date
Page
2 of 76
Name
Date
Review / Checker
Checker
Acceptance
Revision
istoric
Purpose
Date
R-00
First Issue
May 26, 2014
R-0
Page 4 of Appendix A rotated
June 25, 2014
1
Distribution Method
Entity
Dymadoc
WVB / WVC /
Subcontractors
e-Builder
IFA
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Date
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
3 of 76
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES – KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Table of Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
Contractual Requirements
Drainage Networks Identification
Design Criteria
Design Calculations
Appendix A – Signed and Sealed Drawings
Appendix B – Color Coded Drawings for Identification of the Different Drainage Networks
Appendix C - Water Quality Protection Volume Calculations (HEC-HMS Input and Output)
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
4 of 76
1. Contractual Requirements
Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Study (SFEIS) Requirements
from SFEIS Chapter 5, Environmental Consequences (pages 5-211):
In an effort to prevent roadway pollutants from entering the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA),
a drainage system has been designed to contain all runoff into a storm system leading to vaults
prior to releasing the runoff into Harrods Creek. A meeting was held with the Louisville Water
Company (LWC) and Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW) on March 5, 2009, to discuss the
proposed design of the storm water drainage system in the WHPA. The concept was considered
reasonable, acceptable, and of adequate design for the proposed project. The final design of
the drainage system will be submitted to LWC and KDOW for concurrence. The ditches
associated with the roadway fills within the WHPA will be constructed with a berm to contain
not only storm drainage but also materials from a spill. The ditches will drain into the storm
system and to the vaults. After a spill, ditches and pipes would be cleared of material by KYTC
and any materials that reach the vault would be contained, drained, and disposed of as required
under applicable laws and regulations. There will be no direct runoff from the roadway to the
WHPA. The project team will continue to coordinate with LWC and KDOW to ensure that there
will be no direct runoff from the roadway to the WHPA.
Private Public Agreement - Technical Provisions –Section 7.5.1.1
The following provisions shall apply to storm runoff and potential spills from the East End
Bridge, bridges, and roadway within the WHPA for the Final Design.



There shall be no direct roadway runoff to the WHPA. Runoff shall be collected and
floating materials shall be separated before the stormwater is discharged into Harrods
Creek.
Developer shall ensure the drainage system can contain a 26,000 gallon spill. A manual
control shall be provided at a point within the system to stop the spill from entering
Harrods Creek or the WHPA.
Roadway drainage shall be conveyed in either a water-tight storm sewer or lined ditch.
Ditch lining shall be impermeable and shall extend a minimum 1-foot beyond the top of
bank of the ditch.
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
5 of 76
2. Drainage Networks Identification
a. Generality
The drainage systems reaching Harrods Creek (i.e., south and north of Harrods Creek) have been
designed per the SFEIS requirements:


To contain all runoff into a storm system leading to vaults prior to releasing
runoff into Harrods Creek
To allow no direct runoff from the roadway to the WHPA
The drainage system of the East End Bridge, bridges, and roadway within the WHPA (i.e., north
of Harrods Creek) has been designed per Section 7 of the Technical Provisions:



Runoff is collected into retention ponds prior to reaching Harrods Creek
The retention ponds are equipped with a manual control can contain a 26,000
gallon spill
The storm sewer and lined ditch are designed per Technical Provision
requirements
See Signed and Sealed Drawings in Appendix A
b. Drainage Networks Identification – See Appendix B
Blue Section (South of Harrods Creek)
From STA. 61+00 to STA 137+14.08 the water is collected via open ditch, storm water pipes,
inlets and manholes. The water is directed toward the southern abutment of Harrods Creek
Bridge.
From STA 137+14.08 to STA 149+66.42 the water is collected on Harrods Creek Bridge by means
of scupper and drainage pipe. The water collected on the bridge is channeled toward the
southern abutment.
All the water collected on this “blue” section converges to the Water Treatment Box installed
around STA 133+50.00. From this Water Treatment Box, the water is diverted to Harrods Creek
via RCP pipes, manholes, and open ditch.
The liquids collected in the tunnel (water cleaning, fire suppression fluid, spillage) are also
diverted to this Water Treatment Box.
Pink Section (North of Harrods Creek)
The water collected in Middleton Run is coming from the shared used path, the emergency
access road, and upstream of the Middleton Run box culvert.
Green Section (North of Harrods Creek)
The water collected from the roadway section between STA 148+00 to STA 157+00 is diverted
toward pond A by means of paved ditch, manholes and pipes. The maximum volume capacity
for Pond A is approximately 500,000 gallons of water.
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
6 of 76
Yellow Section (North of Harrods Creek)
The water collected from the roadway section between STA 157+00 and STA 212+50 (end of the
main span bridge) is diverted toward Pond B. The water flows toward the pond through
scuppers and drainage pipes hung under the bridge decks, RCP pipes, manholes, and open
paved ditches. The maximum volume capacity for Pond B is approximately 1,000,000 gallons of
water.
All runoff water from the East End Bridge is collected on the Kentucky side of the Ohio River.
Bridge deck drains and storm sewers are used to collect bridge deck runoff into a storage area
(Pond B) at the Kentucky end of the bridge.
Ponds A & B are equipped with manual pond control structures detailed on drawing JDT D3.03
DWG 4.R02 DRN 42027 R 00 (see Appendix A). After settling, the water collected in Ponds A & B
is merged and diverted toward Harrods Creek through pipes, manholes, and open ditches.
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
7 of 76
c. Design Criteria
Information source - Extract from design criteria document JDT D3.02 SPC 4.ALL ALL 10001 R04
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
8 of 76
d. Design Calculations
Information source –Section 4 Drainage report JDT D3.03 RPT 4.R03 DRN 42106 R01
Spread Computations
Spread calculations were performed using the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KTYC) Curb Box
Inlet Calculations spreadsheet. The inlet spacing was determined using a rainfall intensity of 4
inches per hour and allowing no encroachment of the gutter flow into the travel lane. In areas
where barrier walls are present, the allowable spread shall be the width of the shoulders which
vary from 2 feet to 8 feet in the ultimate condition
Storm Sewer & Ditch Computations
The storm water collection system is comprised of a series of inlets, pipes, and drainage ditches
that discharge to either a new storm water treatment facility or to an existing drainage outfall.
Runoff collected within the ditches is captured by drop box inlets and conveyed to the enclosed
drainage system. The piped portions of the collection system have also been analyzed for the
10-year storm event using the KYTC Storm Sewer model.
The main trunk line through the tunnel and the sag location north of the North Portal was
checked with 50-year storm event, and it was confirmed that the HGL lines were below the top
of grate elevations.
Cross Drains Analysis
The headwater elevations for the existing culverts, as well as the proposed extensions have
been analyzed using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Hydraulic Analysis
Program (HY-8). The existing and proposed conditions were analyzed for the 50 and 100-year
storm events. The 50 and 100-year runoff rates were determined using the KYTC Rational
Method spreadsheet. The flows were routed through the culvert, and the rise in headwater was
calculated.
The tailwater was computed based on the normal depth of the downstream channel section at
the culvert location. The purpose of the hydraulic analysis is to ensure that the proposed
extensions do not cause a significant rise in the headwater elevations.
Ditches Calculations
KY 841 roadside ditches are Paved Ditch Type 1 at the shale protection zone near the South
Portal and between the North Portal and South Abutment of Harrods Creek Bridge.
KY 841 roadside ditches are lined with impermeable geomembrane between north of the north
abutment of Harrods Creek Bridge and south of the south abutment of the Kentucky Approach
Bridge. The lining extends a minimum of 1 foot beyond the top of bank. The ditches in this fill
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
9 of 76
section were designed to accommodate a 100-year flood storm event without the runoff
overflowing into the Well Head Protection Area.
Pond Analysis
Ponds A and B were designed and analyzed with HEC-HMS. Both ponds are lined with
geomembrane, and pond control structures are equipped with a manual control gate capable of
stopping a spill from being released into Harrods Creek or the WHPA. The ponds are designed
to contain a 26,000 gallon spill, and there will be no overtopping even with 100-year flood
event. The pond control structures have two orifices and an opening at the top with a grate due
to potential clogging. These ponds will efficiently work for treating the runoff from Section 4
pavements, as well as from the main span deck pavement, and effectively work for attenuating
the peak flows.
Water Quality Protection Volume and Storm water Treatment Box Design
One inch of rainfall was selected for this project to estimate Water Quality Protection Volume
because it is a reasonable target event to address the vast majority of smaller, pollutant-loaded
storms. One inch of rainfall is the 85th percentile storm event for a 30-minute storm duration.
The volume and peak flows were calculated for the Stormwater Treatment Box south of Harrods
Creek and two ponds north of Harrods Creek. All the details of Water Quality Protection Volume
Calculations are located in Appendix C. Stormwater Treatment Box Design was provided by
CONTECH located in Appendix I. WVC can use the CONTECH structure or equivalent approved
by the engineer of record. A selected supplier shall be coordinated with the engineer of record
for final design.
Additional Drainage Calculations
Technical Provisions Section 15.5.19 - Drainage specifies an additional design requirement for
the Kentucky Approach Bridge and Main Span Bridge. According to the IFA response of JDT’s
RFI, the bridge drainage system shall have the capacity to capture and carry the 100-year, 1hour storm away without overflow into the WHPA. In stage 2 submittal the deck pipe system
was designed for INDOT’s criteria; however, it changed to design per KYTC’s criteria. In Appendix
C the flow was very conservatively estimated since INDOT design criteria was still utilized. The
deck drainage system and the watertight deck are designed to handle the 100-year, 1-hour
storm without overflowing into the WHPA. All the detailed calculations related to the additional
drainage requirement are located in Appendix C.
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
10 of 76
Appendix A
Signed and Sealed Drawings
Extracts from JDT D3.03 PKG 4.R03 RDY 41000 Rev 6.0 – (31 pages)
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
SECTION 4A
SECTION 4B
Outfall S4-A4-4A
SECTION 4A
SECTION 4B
SECTION 4B
SECTION 5
SECTION 5
SECTION 6
Outfall S4-A4-4A
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
42 of 76
Appendix B
Color coded drawings for drainage networks identification
Extracts from JDT D3.03 PKG 4.R03 RDY 41000 Rev 6.0 – (29 pages)
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
S4-A2-1
STA. 64+50.00, Jl.00'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4BI
S4-A2-2
STA. 67+50.00. (1.00' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4B1
O
O
o
ln
(X)
zTTn
CE
O
-=
VP
B©
CRADE AREA TO DRAIN
EXISTING OUTLET
:0
END TREATMENT TYPE
GUARDRAIL
— STA. 57+12.06
_____
END GUARDRAIL' r
BEGIN END TREATMENT
TYPE!
-%
CHAIN LINK FENCE
.•?» BR RRUN
"Jin..m _-r
STA. 66*61*55END GUARDRAIL
\
BEGIN END TREATMENT
\
TYPE 1
... L
STAo.64+75.18
END END TREATMENT
TREA
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
SLOPE LMTS
SPRINGDALE RO
%
r—END TREATMENT TYPE 1
rA
*9
- ffi
u."
_. -HE
Y*—
~
r i i u — %
NOISE BARRIER NIC
ARRIER NIB
X
END TREATMENT TYPE 2A
DITCH 3-LT
o
GUARDRAIL—\
zgg
-Ct
LD
OVERHEAD S CN
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE I4B
CURVE
TCY84IM
o
-P-
1
LINE •KY84I*
lD
DITCH 4-LT
\
00
S4-A2-I
00
18' PIPE
18' PIPE
UJ
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
GUARDRAIL
CJ
u
5
EN0 TREATMENT--TYPE.
J
DITCH 3-LT
—
EXIST. R/W
—r V "
=TT
SLOPE LIMITS—'
g
. "KMT. "FOR;
HARRICR-CONSTI
NOISE BARRI
: CJ
4
;
I
1
I
P
'
NOISE BARRIER N2oP^.
STA. 58+83.49
END END TREATMENT
TYPE I
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
r o
BEGIN PAVED DITCH T
STA. 62+00.00 (KY84I
I
T\ C - - -
Ct
YECNTAE
JEONG
i:
: Z3
SSV-
- ?, v
-TJ
CP
:~
29310
ore
0/-
-O
E'cenS©
'7^
—
W0LFPEN WOODS OR
S
It
TT"
JD
O
•s!
--
V W
.•
RESRONSI8U ENGINEER
i
.
4_'
Sis
3;~
/ ^
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
n
PPL022
O _
o o
n: *
t_=l
i£> rO o
o o
: Q
PPL02I
.IIHIIIII,
PPL024
BRIDGE RLE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
l" =50'
03/26/2014
FREY
arc
-o
CONSTRUCTION
RESPONSIBLE ENGINESR
ANDREW
w v
LEAD ENGINEER
in
'PPL020 "PL023
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
PL0I9
KY
CURVE 'KY84P-I DATA
STA
80+I2.I3
= 101,436.9480
N
: 49,481.6934
E
r 26* II'43.48* (RT)
A
0
0" 33' 42.20=
R
10.200.00'
4,663.40'
L
T
2,373.18'
"
272.44'
E
e
2.20/.
: 70 MPH
D.S.
53
03/26/2014
«/-
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
Q JM
SJPENS^ ?V
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authoritygj^jQ^j^^
F
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 57 + 00 TO STA. 68 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPL007
OYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT D3.03 DWG 4.R0I RDY
4I024
43
oi
36!
VERSION
R-00
H-
D°1
V u»
in
O
O
ST A = 64+90.
ci
EL
(M
= 634.
= 313
= 1,110.00'
630
r
t+10.5000
IT)
O
O
PRO ILE GRADE
(+)0.5000 7.
'J. 042/
CO
U3
<
LU
630
00
(ISTING GROUND
.0NG LINE •KY84I
620
98'"'8'STORM
SEWER
LU
PIPE
620
O
610
610
600
600
590
590
580
530
32
s
570
570
560
550
-*U
-O
OO
UO
CT
;<£
550
550
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
\
I
:
jo::
/Ml;
SM#
5 ®
CO <\
—'
E2 £•
r-
ro G
— cc
ID ID
CP
~ rlO
vD
LC
ID
vD
(VJ CO
M <\J
10 vD
—• CO
ro (vj
Li)
-
O
CNJ vO
03 vO
(VI CM
(VI CVJ
ro <\j
ID lC
ID
ID D
60+00
M CP
in
ID ID
CP A>
id
ID ID
<M CM
03/26/2014
ID iC
65+00
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS 0NLY1
REV.
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
LEAD ENGINEER
6/20
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DATE
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
ANDREW P
-T3
-10
-Q
28991
Q3/26/2Q14
DATE
RESPONSIBLE
ore
DESIGNED
JC0
DRAWN
Indiana Finance Authority
UM
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
f'Qn
CHECKEQ
APF
CHECKED
£LLi
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
'=5'
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
*
l'=50'
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO
03/26/20M
PPF006
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
STA. 57 + 00 TO STA. 68 + 00
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I ROY 41037
SHEET NO
361
VERSION
R-00
S4-A2-3
STA. 70+50.00, d.OO'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4BI
S4-A2-4
STA. 70+50.00. (72.24' RT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-5
STA. 73+50.00. 0.00' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4BI
S4-A2-8
STA. 79+50.00. 0.00'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 14B1
S4-A2-7A
STA. 76+50.00. (61.46'RT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9B1
S4-A2-7
STA. 76+50.00. 0.00'LT.) (KY841)
CMBBI TYPE I4BI
S4-A2-6
STA. 73+50.00. (85.09'LT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
O
o
o
o
o
LO
n
u
J1
•
r
=-==i
Q r_'=-=
^
h
so-
d*
in -
CHAIN LINK FENCE
: t—
r^_
*
SPRINGDALE RD
SLOPE LIMITS
XX
PRQF- R/W
&
ST-A- XX
o
rL-nrri
PT STA. 4 2 + 8 1 . L I N E -RAMPB1 =
STA7 75+85.75 LINE 'KY84P
>
STA.
OFFSET 61.33'LT, —- — END 25; t-T APER
r—H T*+
O
O
r.GU..— — —
SE BARR ER NIC
OS.:
S4-A2-6
DITCH 4-LT
.
i_
STA. 72+85.75, 49.33'LT
• - —BEGTN-2S: UAPLH
-Q-
o
.
LINE •RAMPB'
TPH
IVE *RAMPB'-2
25:1 IAPLR
CO
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE I4B
lilt
3
O
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
RAMP R
O
CO
CURVE *KY84P-t
LINE KY84I' —v
S4-A2-J
24' PIPE
(/)
S4-A2-5
4'PIPE
UJ
^
S
o
S4-A2-7
30-
IPE
S4iA2-8
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
30' PI
LU
S4-A2-7A
y
SINGLE FACED BARRIER —'
EXISTR^/W~
7R~~
/-NOISE BARRIER N2
'
O
.
:
•STA. 70+93.64
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN SINGLE FACED BARRIER-
LOPE LIMITS
n
oqBsr^ESBTr
Y —
STA. 40+74.18 2
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
ARDRAIL
ClHc
--—
-
, ^-5TA. 76+75.00
'
\
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
\ BEGIN GUARDRAIL
GUARDRAIL
. >-5TA. 76+59.53
"
" END" SINGLE" FAUETJ BARRIER "" """
BEGIN GUAR0RAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
~J
7/r- -
—
mii,
SLOPE LIMITS -J
r-
I; £>s-*
END PAVED DITCH TYPE
STA7^70+52.12 (KY841)
R /
: ;
i!
O—b.
8 i
cro
~,0\_ ,
STA. 79 + 87.31. I78.77:'RT
END NOISE BARRIER N2
BEGIN SAFETY WALL S2
!—i !
YEGNTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
_
• } IGZ
/At 0
s
T- Q
lfp*«o6O
5
"°
ft
>O
® n!
Q
£ K
!3g
03/26/2014
*
OR
Oi-
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
PPL022
PL0I9
KY 841CURVE
PI STA
:
N
=
E
=
A
=
D
=
R
=
L
=
T
=
E
e
D.S.
-
a u.
||
X 5C
Q i—
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
•KY84I--I DATA
80+12.13
101.436.9480
49.481.6934
26' II' 43.48* (RT)
0* 33' 42.20'
10,200.00'
4,663.40'
2.373.18'
272.44'
2.20'/.
70 MPH
REV.
DESCRIPTION
CURVE 'RAMPB-2' 0ATA
= 36+09.64
PI STA
= 101,718.4604
N
=
E
49,288.1386
r 7* 30'39.36* (LT)
A
s
0* 33' 28.03'
D
= 10.272.00'
R
=
1,346.56'
L
=
T
674.25'
z 22.10'
E
z
e
2.20X
=
50 MPH
D.S
LH—1 l-N---J—
CM <n t m
O O o o
O O O o 0 0
/ /§
Q_ Q- Q- 0. cl a. I if-j
CL Q. Q- Q. °" °" / AS'PPL020 "PL023
PPL02I
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DATE
WV|
LEAD ENGINEER
PPL024
F
/
:I
CONSTRUCTION |
ANDREW P.
FREY
PE-28991
03/26/2014
VI\ "
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
S :
/OR C
DESIGNED:
JC0
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
DATE
LJM
QTJ
yA Indiana Finance AuthorityT^rrv^pC
^SODESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
KY84I
N/A
J
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 68 + 00 TO STA. 80 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT D3.03 DWG 4.R0I RDY 4I025
SHEET NO.
VERSION
R-00
650
650
640
O
o
x *:
< CD
CO
.IX) IX)
- rO CO
•?3 = =
10 lO
LD
LUUJ
wl
630
a
< -
LXJ
0O«M ,
620
298'./G
O
storu
620
^SS
PROF ILE GRADE
lie
< CD
^UJUJ
l/l - ——
sE *ER Pjpc
MOlffl
•Ol/l
i-=?
610
24' ST( RM
SEWER PIPE
1V£R
610
XI CTIEN
1X11X1
>IP£
£
UJUJ
TOP OF L MEST0NE
IS
600
24' STC RM
SEWER PIPE
298 24
STORM
O
o
XI CO
600
SEWER PIPE
H3.( 42/ JF-OR
18' STORM
SEWER PIPE
590
293
3O'STORM-SE^
590
2879
P/PE
LJ
STA = 78+90.00
580
EL
L
md KJ
580
= 592.20'
K : 211
U
.= 370.00'
570
570
560
560
550
550
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE I AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
11
a,,
i'co/
I!
540
540
Vo\
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
'''P}
o>.<
^7v
**
k ..
© ©
530
530
^
o
CVJ
ro
(\J
ro
rv i
<D
<7»
in
m
o
iD
«JT
o
Cs:
cO
70+00
LD T
o
0"> RO
O O
ro
O csj
KD JD
03/26/2014
DESCRIPTION
w
3
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE:
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
RESRONSOLE ENGINEER
80+00
75+00
CONSTRUCTION
£<*/
; / ANDREW P.
: j
FREY
PE-28991
{/A
1 ] :
/arc
''%£S
••••!?.SK-.&*
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JC0
APF
r=50*
Indiana Finance AuthorityT^rf^-pC
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
DESIGNATION
r=5'
DATE
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 68 + 00 TO STA. 80 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/20'4
PPF007
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I RDY 4I038
SHEET NO.
46
of
361
VERSION
R-00
S4-A2-9
STA. 81+50.00. 0.00' LT.) (KY841)
CMBBI TYPE I4B1
S4-A2-IIA
STA. 81+39.00. 192.16'RT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE B W/ GRATE
S4-A2-IO
STA. 82+50.00, (85.81' LT.) (KY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-II
STA. 81+40.00. (81.75' RT.XKY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-12
STA. 82+50.00. (6.50'LT.> (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE C (MODIFIED)
S4-A2-14
STA. 84+50.00, 11.00' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4BI
/
DITCH WPI-RT
//,
7
w
/
S4-A2-I6
/
STA. 87+85.51. (119.42* RT.XKY84I)
DR0P
B0X INLET TYPE 2
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
\
R\ J
L
O
O
%A?
cn
DITCH SD-I-RT
O
O
S4--A3-3
G
18' PIPE
-DITCH
WP2-LT
Yt
S4-A3--C
•IP
S4IAL=
o
M
<<;.S
ro
CHAIN LINK FENCE
SEE NOTI
PROP R/W
*
AESTHETIC WALL.
| SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
&
STA
DIT
SLOPE LIMITS
NOISE BARRIER NIC
SLOPE LMTS
OVEN'WIRE FENCE
/—RAMP B STA. 34+52.71
/
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
/
BEGIN SINGLE. £ACED-BARWER
V-R^RXMP B STA. 34+37.34
/
/ / END GUARDRAIL
//
' /
BEGIN GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR //
SD„-.-L
AESTHETIC W
SEE LANDSCA
PLANS -—AT
S4-A2-20
STA. 90+50.00. (78.21* RT.MKY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-21
STA. 31+35.00. (8.13* RT.) (RAMP A)
CMBBI TYPE 9AI
S4-A2-2IA
STA. 30+94.00. (8.13* RT.) (RAMP A)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
S4-A2-I5
STA. 88+00.00, D.OO' LT.HKY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4B1
/
/,
S4-A2-13
STA. 83+50.00. (6.51' LT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE C (MODIFIED)
DITCH SD*2
S4-A2-I9
STA. 90+50.00. (1.00'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE I4B1
S4-A2-17
STA. 87+85.51, (170.12'RT.) (KY84I)
SLOPED & FLARED BOX INLET
- h ~ TYPE-A
GUARDRAIL
RAMP B STA. 32+87;46-...
END END TREATMENT TYPE I
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
—END -IREATJAENJ -JYPE A- W ''
"
:
//
RAMP B STAZ 28+67.53
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN END TREATMENT'
Ul o
in
-iff EHMfl
GUARORAIL
CG
C\J£+
3
CO
SAFETY* WALL
OO
urnuui nAnnim IHANSIIIONS.
LU
SHEET PDS036
30* IPE
+57.00
61.33U
STA. 80+01.97
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE
LO
CURVE *KY84I*-I
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
S4-A2-I4
NOTEI
AN
S4-A2-I9
mm
S4-A
S4-A2J
S4-A2-I5
+00 00
65.98'RT
CURVE
•RAMPA'-'
febg
3m +1
R ?2.95'°RT
/
42^IPE
I- <
1
< r~
GUARDRAIL
^
y
YVI TEPFR (SFF NOTF
IIRVF 'RAUP A*-?
5=
DITCH 7-RT
NE "RAMPA
4-A2-II
STA. 80+17.43
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN SINGLE FACED BARRIER
S4-A2A-3
" J
nnnrpo
•50.00 ,
67.63* RT
OVERHEAD
SIGN
22 +61
LINE RAMP -*&• =
SIA
STA.
St 81+59.76 LINE "KY84I"
OFFSET 49.33'RT.
SAFETY WALL S3
-A2A-2
Ai.
RAMP
RDRAIL
-RAMP A STA. 25+20.92
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
KY84I STA. B3+03.67=
RAMP A STA. 25+05.53
END SINGLE FACED BARRIER
BEGIN GUARDRAIL -CONNECTOR TYPE -A
Ul
m-
x •.
18* P PE
|
^
&
PC
^C/>
Of KSA,
JQ
GATE
X—SLOPE LIMITS
. ENTRANCE
CONST. (SEE KYTC STANDARD RF|G- 010-04)
EN
TEMP. ESMT. FOR DIVERSION.
TION
RAMP A STA. 29+21.21 j
T
AND REVEGETATION
SEE NOTE 3\
~~
O
END GUARDRAIL
|
CRASH
BEGIN CUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
in
CUSHION
TYPE A
J
C\J
TYPE VI-C
RAMP A STA. 29+36.66
'
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE A RAMP A ST
29+79.97
AESTHETIC WALL.
BEGIN SINGLE FACED BARRIER
FACED BARRIER
BBGIN SI
SEE LANDSCAPE
m
LINE "RAMPA*PLANS
RAMP A STA. 30+79.40
END SINGLE FACED BARRIER
DRA NAGE
BEGIN GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
m.
TYPE A
/ R„0P. R/W &
M
m
It
So
%
/A
•IP
J
V
7
CURVE "RAMPA'-L DATA
= 25+30.63
STA
= 101,931.1884
N
=
49.192.5405
E
= 3* 03'00.93* (RT)
A
= 0* 34*03.68*
D
= 10,092.80'
R
= 537.31'
L
= 268.72'
T
= 3.58*
E
= 2.20Z
e
S 70 MPH
D.S.
it
H
II
CURVE *RAMPA*-2 DATA
PI STA
: 30+04.51
= 102.170.9246
N
= 48.783.6309
E
= 7" 12' 47.00* (RT)
A
= 3* 40'22.I0*
0
= 1.560.00*
R
= 196.39'
L
= 98.33*
T
= 3.09'
E
= 6.00*/.
e
: 50 MPH
D.S.
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
»
PPL022
-f
CURVE "RAMPB-2* DATA
= 36+09.64
PI STA
= 101.718.4604
N
= 49.288.1386
E
= 7* 30' 39.36* (LT)
A
= 0* 33' 28.03*
D
= 10.272.00'
R
= 1.346.56*
L
= 674.25'
T
= 22.10'
E
= 2.20*/.
e
=
50 MPH
D.S
CURVE *KY84I*-I DATA
s 80+12.13
PI STA
=
101,436.9480
N
49.481.6934
E
=
26* II' 43.48* (RT)
A
=
0* 33'42.20*
D
R
10.200.00'
: 4.663.40'
L
T
2.373.18'
- 272.44'
E
r 2.20*/.
e
=
70 MPH
D.S.
+PPL020 PPL023
PPL024
PPL02I
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DESCRIPTION
wv
6/20
PL019
KY 841
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
icof
03/26/2014
\7i.ANDREW P
FREY
PE-28991
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES*
/ORE
W;
'"ill"'
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
L JM
QTJ
\ : :
)K £
/Mi;
-O
BEGIN PAVED DITCH TYPE 2—STA. 31+43.95 (RAMPA)
•AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
9-^
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
/
I
AESTHETIC CABLE—'
RAILING
RET WALL RL —
/ RET WALL R2-
RAMP A STA. 30+94.59
END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
32
n
O"',
A.
\
m ?>
/A
A
C.
TE"MPI ESMT f o r ~
WALL CONST.
AND REVEGETATION
/
"'.7 / /FR:
SEE SHEET PDS005 FOR
TAPER INFORMATION.
4.
£(M
/
<C
SEE SHEETS PL0I9, PL020. PL021
& PL022 FOR WOLF PEN ROAD AND
SPRINGDALE ROAD DRAINAGE.
o
C\i
3-roQ.
CJ
I
t-
S4-A2-16—1
S4-A2-I7
18* PIPE—
SAFTFY WALL
U]
O
3G^XT?TFWW^WATER
LEAD ENGINEER
FOR RETAINING WALL LAYOUT. SEE
STRUCTURE SHEETS.
DITCH RA1-LT
WALL R6
a
THE BARRIER SECTIONS BETWEEN THESE
FOUR POINTS:
STA. 80+57.00 61.33'RT
STA. 82+00.00 65.98'RT
STA. 82+50.00 67.63' RT
STA. 83+94.00 72.95'RT
ARE TO BE CAST AS TANGENT PIECES.
cn
RZ rlrt
a _
•H a ®
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
IK: g^lVVoty1
I- <
< H-
L NE 'RAMPB
L NE 'KY841-
S4-A2-I3
k
SINGLE
FACED
BARRIER
A
3
in oj
CJURVE 'RAMPB
RAMP-6-STA. 35+99.97
END SINGLE FACED RARRIFR Co N)
RAMP B
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 80 + 00 TO STA. 91 + 00
l"= 50'
27024
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
N/A
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
03/26/2014
PPL009
OYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT D3.03 OWG 4.R0IRDY 41026
47
of
361
VERSION
R-00
650
650
T WOLF PEN BRANCH ROAD
STA 82*64.67
640
640
630
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG LINE "KY84I
STRUCTURE NO. 270 4
620
O
o
610
wCE
O
CO
u>o
in —
oio
"N m
mm
610
< o-
Ln
o
mco
600
O
600
R; a, ®tr
fir-CB
mm
UIUJ
——
J— TOP OF LIMES TONE
< CD CC
STA = 891+60.00
o o O l£>
• t- (M lO
to
590
EL
-
24' STORM
SEWER P IPE
570
8'"36' STORM
SEWER PIPE
18' STORM
SEWER PIPE
96'-36" STORM
SEWER PIPE
W-Jb' SrORR
m SEWER PIPE
T-Z
STORM
00
I, 200.00'
< cr
r"J4.
580
in in
0000
590
LLJ
SS
II. 2879
SEWER PIPE
= 5 8.42'
442
m u> io u>
m mm
PR (FILE GRAOE
580
CT>
x x: t-
u
WE
570
30' ST 0RM
SEWER PIPE
560
560
24' STOR
SEWER PIPE
550
550
540
540
550
550
520
520
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE I AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
" £
lllll!
o o
uu
u u
tt
* *
510
510
500
500
O
o I—
oo in
—
2S
IM
IN LD
CO
m
C\J
in LO
co C\J
in LO
in >2
in Id
DESCRIPTION
w
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
in u>
in i0
r- o
in 10
CONSTRUCTION
03/26/2014
90+00
03/26/2014
: ( ANDREW P.
: J
FREY
\ PE-28991
\ •
: :
/OR;
'"£'ONAL^>x
'"in
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
BRIDGE RLE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
.%*»c
DATE
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JCQ
APF
Indiana Finance Authority
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
|_ JM
QTJ
l'-50'
VERTICAL SCALE
DES GNAT10N
l'=5'
DATE
RESPONSIBLE
\
S
la:
(X)
P 6
85+00
REV
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
CO <jr
£
rs!
CO
80+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
01
(M
CO
10 (J>
in o>
R L
: :
z3.\
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 80 + 00 TO STA. 91 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO
03/26/20 4
PPF008
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I ROY 4I039
SHEET NO
48
oi
36l
VERSION
R-00
S4-A2-I8
STA. 92+00.00. (99.11' LT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-22
STA. 93+00. D.OO'LT.) (KY841)
CMBBI TYPE I4B1
S4-A2-23
STA. 96+00, (3.70'LT.) (KY84I)
CONST. CMBBI TYPE 9BI
RAMP B
STA. 24+25.38
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
RAMP B
STA. 24+40.75
END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN SINGLE
FACED BARRIER
RAMP B
STA. 26+39.65
END SINGLE FACED
BARRIER
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR
TYPE A
S4-A2-25
STA. 21+70.00. (23.47'RT.) (RAMPB)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-26
STA. 97+75.00. (6.20' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
S4-A2-24
STA. 22+63.41, (8.13* RT.) (RAMPB)
CMBBI TYPE 9AI
RET WALL R5B
0
O
AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING —
S4-A2-24C
STA. 22+63.41. (33.87'LT.) (RAMPB)
18'STANDARD HEADWALL
S4-A2-27
STA. 97+40.00. (68.53'RT.) (KY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
oo
S4-A2-3I
STA. 101+00.00. (53.14' RT.MKY841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
CHAIN LINK FENCE
O
CM
STA. 17+50.00. 15'LT
END 50:1 TAPER
END TREATMENT TYPE I
RAMP B
STA. 18+71.54
V
END ENO TREATMEN7
TYPE I
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
£
l/l
RAMPB'-2
<—
•OV^
1
OVICH rbi-R"
Ld o
—-
T
CONSTR. CHANNEL
LINING CLASS 11
841 S0UTHB0UND8,0'x5.0'
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE I4B
L NE 'KY841'
ZQ
S4-A2-29
END TREATMENT TYPE I
—-
NGLE SIDED BARRIER
—
GUARDRAIL
——
DITCH B-LT
I- O
y.
-MLU1AN BARHltH
Sift. 98+66.84END GUARDRAIL
CURVE
'K
•KY841--2I
TYPE I2D—
--BEGIN END TREATMENT
- TYPE I S4-A2-26"^
7A I RA'PPICP^TAPFR ,
48-PIPE
„
O
NOTE?
S4-A2-
^ KY 841 NORTHBOUND
if/ ...
GUARDRAIL
-
.r..
50:1
mmtjS
co
UJ
.
18' PIP
S4-A2-32B
48' PIPE
S4-A2-3IA
S4-A2-22A
* UI
r,
-J
O
STA. 100 + 75.54 'KY841' :
STA 41+90.72 'RAMPA'
BIA
RAMP A
GUARDRAIL
3
A PER
—
-21^
RET WALL R3FI^I^A-^
—"
63' W
rs)
•- —
END END TREATMENT TYPE 1
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
run
CURVE 'RAMPA'-3
+1
70? IRA
.
4-A2-3I
STAF 95+31.81
uCPT RAi-1 T
SEE SHEETS PDS06 THROUGH DS018 FOR
ADDITIONAL TAPER INFORMATION.
]9?«5ii TAPER
</>
Z7
O
54-A2-32A
42'
I— <
<T I
s-
1C*
*VXBM
T34-A2-24 '
-A2-24A
9'E
>2" 46'
UO
r>
+ V-1
S4-A2-28
S4-A2-I8
AMP 'B
-&y
OVTCH
GUARDRAIL
CO
CJ
H- < (X
fur
END TREATMENT TYPE I
CURVE
—V
—
S4-A2-25
CM CL
S4-A2-32B
STA. 102+50.00. (54.50'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-32A
STA. 102+50.00. (11.81' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
LLJ O
in
S4-A2-31A
STA. 101+00.00. (71.27' RT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 1
S4-A2-32
STA. 102+50.00, (76.95'LT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
SLOPE LIMITS
^22^ EXIST
GUARDRAIL
S4-A2-28
STA. 19+00.00, 121.67'RT.) (RAMPB)
18' STANDARD HEADWALL
S4-A2-29
STA. 19+00.00. (37.16'LT.) (RAMPB)
18*ELL HEADWALL
RAMP B
STA.-47+89.91
END END TREATMENT
TYPE I
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
O
O
RET WALL R5
-AESTHETIC CA8LE RAILING
— LINE 'RAMPB'
/—RET WALL R4
V
/ J—AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
ROP.
S4-A2-30
STA. 100+00.00. (9.42' LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
O
O
RAMP B
STA. 21+25.00
END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN SINGLE FACED
BARRIER
O
o
S4-A2-27A
STA. 38+53.90. (17.50'LT.) (RAMPA)
FLUME INLET TYPE 2
O
O
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
END TREATMENT TYPE
RAMP B
STA. 26+55.03
END GUARDRAI
CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
S4-A2-24A
STA. 23+00.38, (8.13' RT.) (RAMPB)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
S4-A2-24B
STA. 22+26.44. (8.13'RT.) (RAMPB)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
!£> RAMP B
/
—V"
STA. 21+09+62
END GUARDRAIL /
\
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
\
CONNECTOR TYPE A
\
STA. 93+88.31
END END TREATMENT
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
RAMP B
STA. 26+31.84
END SINGLE FACED
BARRIER
S4-A2-22A
STA. 37+60.00. (27.61'LT.) (RAMPA)
METAL END SECTION TYPE 3
S4-A2-22B
STA. 37+60.00, (16.92'RT.) (RAMPA)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 10
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE 12B
SIA._39+04.37
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
....TYPE.A
END STD INTEGRAL "CURB
MP
/
|
I
A
S4-AW2B
l/j
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
\
•
/OR
/MJ
RET WALL RIA
AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
PROP
TA
& C. A.
S
T- Q
RET WALL R2—
p
AESTHETIC CA8LE RAILING
SINGLE FACED —
BARRIER
RET WALL RIB
END PAVED DITCH TYPE 2
STA. 37+57.64 (RAMPA)
5£
RAMP A
STA. 38+65.27
BEGIN STD
INTEGRAL CURB
C
O
11
*T
a. £
CURVE
PI STA
N
E
A
D
R
L
T
E
e
D.S.
'KY84P-I DATA
80+12.13
101.436.9480
49.481.6934
26' II'43.48'(RT)
0' 33' 42.20'
10.200.00'
4.663.40'
2.373.18'
272.44'
2.20'/.
70 MPH
LD
CJRVE 'RAMPA'-3 DATA
ro
PI STA
= 37+35.14
= 102.616.8267
= 48.204.5186
= 29' 06' 31.72' (LT)
= 3' 40'22.10'
= 1.560.00'
= 792.55'
= 405.02'
= 51.72'
= 5.20'/.
= 45 MPH
D.S.
CURVE "RAMPB'-I DATA
PI STA
= 16+57.00
= 102,614.9815
= 47,545.4683
= 18* 44' 41.41' (RT)
= 2' 22' 38.71'
= 2.410.00'
= 788.45'
= 397.78'
= 32.61'
= 4.402
= 50 MPH
D.S.
°NSL'
-
O
AN0MRVB?~ WALL
"EVEGETATTON
03/26/2014
SLOPE LIMITS
O
RESPONSIBLE ENGWEER
STA. 39+10.87
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
SAFETY WALL S3
iSS
o
1.7
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
PPL022
RAMP A
STA. 38+88.80
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARORAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
STA. 98+11.68. 116.57'RT
BEGIN WOVEN WIRE FENCE
TYPE I
TSJ
WOVEN WIRE FENCE
TYPE I
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
PL0I9
841
RO
STA. 98+24.27 172.02'RT
END WOVEN WIRE FENCE
TYPE I
PPL020 PPL023
PPL021
PPL024
RAMP A
STA. 39+04.47
END SINCLE FACED BARRIER
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
O-OFW;,;;.,.
wv
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
CONSTRUCTION
O,',
^^03/26/2014
A'.D^bV.
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES*
FREY
28931
A:;
A/-
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JCO
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
L' = 50'
27025
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
KY84I
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 91 + 00 TO STA. 103 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPL0I0
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I ROY 41027
SHEET NO.
49
Of
361
VERSION
R-00
640
630
630
610
610
EXISTING GR JUND
ALONG LINE KY84I
O
BR AMP
STA 100+75.54
600
—
TOP OF
IM£ST0NE
590
£
< _I
[RUCTURE 10. 27025
CD (\J
U
CO CD
IN M
mm
UJ LD
570
O
570
U> CO
ro
o
=8
PROFILE GRADE
o -
560
560
l/l
in i
IB" STC RM
SEWER PIPE
LIJ
i>-
550
PIP
550
«r w
rn ro i£)
in CM CVJ
in in
"3^5:
540
U
CO —
540
FLOFIU
223'-
24' STORM
SEWER PIPE
'"48,S7( Ru
530
0000
sE*er
PlPF
530
'44'520
520
18- STORM
SFWFP
SEWER PIPE
18" STORM
SEWER PIPE
s
ia
P/PF
510
510
500
500
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE I AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2 ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
ST
gS
a!
m
IL?
%||»LI•I#
#-
&
fa
490
490
-7
v?A
PE-29310
Is;
4sf
* ^
480
430
LP X>
O =-
ro
h- C
(VJ ^
ro co
CNJ c
CM; CM
ID O
IN U>
in io
o
-
LP CO
M P->
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
100+00
95+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
REV.
DESCRIPTION
03/26/2014
in xi
in cc
DATE
1ftVi
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
WK Indiana Finance AuthorityTOuirN^pC
Z f
; i
Z^X
ANDREW P. \ FREY
j :
PE-28991
fa::
flT/2fi/2niZ
' L ^UJ/CB/CUN
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES"
DATE
T
DESIGNED:
JC0
DKiLAj±^
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
LJM
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
LEAD ENGINEER
CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGE RLE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
QTJ
STA. 91 + 00 TO STA. 103 + 00
r=50*
27025
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
r=5*
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
UJ/
03/?6/?fli4
LU/ LU "
R
PPF009
R I \j\J j
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R0I RDY 41040
SHEET NO.
60
JV
VI
of
361
JUI
VERSION
R-00
*0°
END CONSTRUCTION
RAMP A
STA. 48+54.49
M
MATCH EXIST
-
.
\
LINE -US42"
O
O
STA. 104+88.63, 451.67'LT
END CHAIN LINK FENCE
LT>
STA. 45+29+48
II'LT
BEGIN 15s I TAPER
S4-A2-33
STA. 104+00.00, <13.12* LT.) (KY841)
CMBBI TYPE 9B1
S4-A2-34
STA. 104+00.00, (55.76'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-37
STA. 107+89.18, (82.60'LT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 1
S4-A2-33A
STA. 44+97.20. (17.50'LT.) (RAMPA)
FLUME INLET TYPE 2
S4-A2-35
STA. 106+25.00, (14.96'LT.) (KY841)
CMBBI TYPE 9B1
S4-A2-38
STA. 107+89.18, (26.44'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
S4-A2-36
STA. 106+25.00, (57.63'RT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-38A
STA. 107+80.00, (2.30' RT.) (KY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 11
S4-A2-36A
STA. 106+25.00, (75.76' RT.XKY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A2-39
STA. 107+89.18, (23.00'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE C (MODIFIED)
•?0S;
POT 10+00.00
o
o
•
END CONSTRUCTION
RAMP B
STA. 12+20.00
iT
IP
\
o
m
o
A
POST
MATCH EXIST
50+14.49
CHAIN LINK FENCE
STA. 45+18.95
END END TREATMENT
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
VX
SLOPE
LIMITS
0*
STA. 44+85.95
END INTEGRAL
CURB
-2*\
STA. 28+12.81
END END TREATMENT TYPE 1
BEGIN GUARDRAIL ,
(SEE NOTE I)
*
STA. 13+00.00 ..
24'LT
BEGIN 50s I TAPER
3*
\
yr. •
-•
LINE "RAMPS' —
A
GATE
STA. 108+10.00
END SINGLE FAC|D BARRIER
<5+74.27
SINGLE FACED BARRIER
RET WALL RI2A
SINGLE FACED BARRIER
CHAlN LINK FENCE
"V-ST-A. 103+91.25 143.03'LT
BEGIN CHAIN LINK FENC£___—
~""x
PROTECTION
PAVED DITCH TYPE I
UtT€+7-TTPri \ /
STA. 103+50.00
-P"^ c
54-
DITCH 9-LTJ^
20s IB^RIER
1 TAP.
TAPER
?PAF3
-A2-3
ft
(VJ
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
Tpe38A
SEE SHEETS PDS007 FOR ADDITIONAL
TAPER
INFORMATION.
4?
,#E%
LINE -KY84I*
S4-A2-41
SINGLE
SI
RFTAPER
MEDIAN BAKHILH
W
-j -
X —
,2B
S4-A2-36
48* PIPE
7
GUARDRA L
SHALE PROTECTION
PAVEO DITCH TYPE I
SLOPE LIMITS
J
STA. 106+25.73
END GUARDRAIL.:
BEGIN_GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR TYPE
BEGIN SINGLE FACE BARRIER
TEMP. ESMT. FOR
WALL CONST.
AND REVEGETATION
-,-P
J- ~
-,Q
70s 1 BARRIER TAPER
\A
V
30s I BARRIER
TAPER
STA. 31+58.07
ENO GUAR0RA1L (SEE NOTE I)
BEGIN END TREATMENT TYPE I
-STA. 108+10.00
X;\
END SINGLE
.FACED BARRIER
•' ">
5TA. 308+50.48, 121.02'RT
END CHAIN."LINK FENCE
03/26/2014
PERM. ESMT. FOR TUNNEL
\
END TREATMENT TYPE 1
STA. 107+10.00. BEGIN BARRIER
END 14' SHLDR. BEGIN 4' SHLDR.
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
ET WALL RIO
PPL022
PL0I9
KY 841
BEGIN PAVED DITCH T"
TYPE. I
STA. 107+10.57 (KY84I)
12-WATER LINE
SEE NOTE 1
CURVE 'RAMPB'-l DA
-WATER GATE
[
)
(SEE KYTC STANDARD RFG-010-04)
(DPI STA. 107+10.00 9.62' LT
PAVEMENT TRANSITION
CURVE •KY841--2 DATA
II3+85.0I
STA
: 103.445.7375
N
46.669.6429
E
r 12* 44'14.52'(RT)
A
=
0- 35'26.44'
D
: 9. 700.00'
R
2.156.40'
L
- 1.082.66'
T
E
60.23'
r 2.20'/.
e
70 MPH
D.S.
16+57.00
102,614.9815
47.545.4683
18* 44'41.41-(RT)
2* 22' 38.712,410.00'
788.45'
397.78'
PI STA
ESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
END PAVEO DITCH TYPE 1
STA. 106 + 41.20
32.61*
4.40*/.
50 MPH
D.S.
o o
o o
ZPPL020
PPL021
ppL023
PPL024
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DESCRIPTION
'
'.O
CONSTRUCTION
03/26/2014
V-/-.
ANDREW
FREY
28991
w
6/20
\
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
T WALL fHfj
SAFETY WALL S3
&
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
I
I
T>\
2-36* RCP
3LE RAILING
PROP. R/W
BEGIN PAVED DITCH TYPE I
STA. 103+50.00
841 NORTHBOUND
7^-STA. ioS>ib.oo
' BEGIN TUNNEL
. STA.. J06+41.20
l/l
Jn
' V
.,S4-A2-41A
2-36'RCP
IPE
-34
32
FACED
BARRIl
8- PIPE
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR. TYPE-A.
LEAD ENGINEER
RELOCATED 12'WATER LINE CUTS
ACROSS PROPOSED US 42 GUARDRAIL.
CENTER RELOCATED WATERLINE
BETWEEN TWO GUARDRAIL POSTS.
ADJUST GUARDRAIL BEGIN / ENO
LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO MISS THE
WATERLINE. THE SHIFT SHALL BE LESS
THAN 12.5'.
o
L
-A2-33
END TREATMENTTYPE 2A
STA. 103+58.88
END TREATMENT
LU O
O
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
m
*1
\
OR
TYP
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE I2B
70il
PERM. ESMT. FOR TUNNEL
\ 5
CURVE
-i-
AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
N
RET WALL RI2
SOUTH PORTAL DITCH
SEE PDS042 FOR DETAILS
CLT-XO.-TQA
S4-A2-39A
AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
STA. 108+fc. 00—
END MEDIAN
BARRIER
18- PIPE
*
STA. 44+66.07
BEGIN SINGLE
FACED BARRIER
RET WALL
R3B LOWER
RET WALL
R3B UPPER
STA. 103+52.95 106.65'LT
BEGIN CHAIN LINK FENCE
S4-A2-40B
STA. 108+34.28, (2.23' RT.) (KY841)
DBI TYPE 15
(STRUCTURE LOCATED ON TOP OF SOUTH PORTAL)
0°
INGLE FACED BARRIER
STA. 44+39.07END BRIDGE
STA. 111+50.00, (34.93'RT.) (KY841)
48-JUNCTION BOX
(STRUCTURE LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL)
END PAVED DITCH TYPE I
STA. 108+09.70
a.C
ST
S4-«-41A"^"-
ft
LINE 'RAMPA* Y
Q
S4-A2-41
STA. 111+50.00, (28.43' RT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
(STRUCTURE LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL)
s
9-+
STA. 44+59.57
ENO APPROACH SLAB
A.
STA.' 107+84.24 66.57'LT
GUARDRA L CONNECTOR TYPE 2A
BEGIN SINGLE FACED BARRIER
A
&
S4-A2-40A
STA. 107+30.00. (61.23'RT.HKY841)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
STA. 107+68.40'
END GUARDRAIL
•rrfki
BEGIN -rnkikicrTAO
CONNECTOR TVDC
TYPE •2A
SlSSP*"
STA. 44+66.07
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
OF HARRODS CREEK
END PAVED DITCH TYPE I
STA. 108+14.84 «Y84I)^
0,-TF
v
STA. 44+81.45
END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR
TYPE A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
S4-A2-40
STA. 107+89.18, (61.73'RT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
STA. 107+94.17. 120.52' LT
END CHAIN LINK FENCE
CURVE "RAMPB'-2
i§
S4-A2-39A
STA. 107+89.18, (2.30'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE A
- END TREATMENT TYPE 1
''7'°NAL^V
"HI'"'
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES*
arc
Uj~
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
CHECKED:
JCO
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
|_JM
QTJ
27025
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
KY84I
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DESIGNED:
l- = 50'
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 103 + 00 TO STA. 114 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG- NO.
03/26/20'4
PPLOIl
51
of
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R0I RDY 4I028
R-00
361
620
620
610
610
600
600
£ US 42
9+73.78
STA
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG LI •JE 'KY84I
590
590
580
580
TOP OF LIMESTONE 1
570
570
!
\
560
560
550
550
•36' PIPE
36'PIPE-
540
540
D
•36- PIPE
a
6*
O
. CO CD
O O in
530
o
If) If)
X H< —•
if) O
PR0FI .E GRADE
520
530
CO 00
CO
510
PIPC
u
O
O
"TO
TOP OF
SHALE I
0O
TOP OF TUNFEL
520
c? cS !?
00
*'0000
?0
18* STORM
SEWER PIPE
R
—
SEE TUNNEL PL/ANS
>R DETAILS
18' STORM
SEWER PIPE
500
ROADWAY DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES IN TUNNEL
sewer
510
co o
<LU
- ~
CC>
CT. rr
500
CJ
JE
STORM
SEWER PIPE
35
490
*-36 Rep
sr
se»er
TOP OF LIMESTONE
J
490
Pipe
BOTTOM OF TUNNEL ^
PROPOSED TUNNEL PR0FIL
S =
?95-2^3
480
ZR'Rep
fg
430
ST0RU
sever
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE 1 AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2 ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
PIPE
470
470
460
460
o,vV
•w
JEONG
-Y.I
* S£
PE-29310
;CC
450
450
CM
CD
CM
CM
CO CI
^ cc
en -r-
in in
in in
in in
O
co en
CM
CO R;
CP
in m
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
/^^^^^DATT^"
REV.
DESCRIPTION
(\J
CO
O
CO
LD CP
if)
m k±>
—
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
105+00
LEAD ENGINEER
\f-Z-
YEONTAE
110+00
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DATE
\\IS6
1
?<*/
R / ANDREW P.
: {
FREY
PE-28991
CONSTRUCTION |
YI\ : C
/OR R
t/A
RESPONSIBLE ENGINE&N
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JC0
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
P=50'
Indiana Finance AuthorityT^inrv^'pQ
r=5*
DATE
L JM
QTJ
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 103 + 00 TO STA. 114 + 00
DRAWING DATE
KY841
DWG. NO.
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I ROY 4104I
SHEET NO.
VERSION
R-00
o
o
+
M
S4-A2-42
STA. 114+50.00. (28.57'RT.) (KY 841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-44
STA. 122+50.00, (28.57'RT.) (KY 841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-42A
STA. 114+50.00, (35.07'RT.) (KY 841)
48' JUNCTION BOX
S4-A2-44A
STA. 122+50.00, (35.07'RT.) (KY 841)
48'JUNCTION BOX
O
O
+
o
(\J
S4-A2-43
STA. 118+50.00, (28.57' RT.XKY 841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
/
S4-A2-43A
STA. 118+50.00, (35.07'RT.) (KY 841)
48'JUNCTION BOX
c?
SAFETY WALL S4
STA. 123+65.44, 205.58'LT
END CHAIN LINK FENCE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
"KL
PERM. ESMT. FOR TUNNEL
TUNNEL
O
O
M
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
C\J
=
LINE 'KY84I'
^
I C U R V E
•KY84I
LD
I
I
S 4 A2
GO
S4 -A2-
S4-A2-4
O r^36' RCP
--42A
36 RCP
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
T+-A2-43A
36 R C P
2-36' RCP
CJ
PERM. ESMT. FOR TUNNEL
OS",
Z !
YEONTAE
I -
: |
ISA
JEONG
PE-29310
/or;
-"9A
-o
I
] :
/,
r- 6
UJ
03/26/2014
J
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY!
PPL022
11
IT
* *
lis
PL0I9
KY 84!
CURVE •KY84l'-2 DATA
s 113+85.01
PI STA
=
103,445.7375
N
= 46,669.6429
E
=
12* 44'14.52'(RT)
A
=
0* 35'26.44'
D
=
R
9,700.00'
=
2,156.40'
L
; 1,082.66'
T
:
E
60.23'
s 2.20'/.
e
=
D.S.
70 MPH
PPL020 PPL023
PPL02I
PPL024
HORIZONTAL SCALE
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGE FILE
l" = 50'
C4J/
\71-
03/26/2014
ASDRBV.
FREY
-,-p
-,Q
V*.
28991
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
""in"'
JCQ
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
L JM
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority
ft
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
KY841
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWING DATE
DWG NO
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 114 + 00 TO STA. 124 + 00
03/26/20^4
PPL012
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R0I ROY 41029
SHEET NO
36!
VERSION
R-00
590
590
580
580
570
570
560
560
f
550
TOP OF
MESTONE
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG L NE 'KY84I
550
540
540
530
530
•36'PIPE
520
36' PIPE-
o
o
T
510
D
TOP OF SHALE 1
TOP OF TUNNEL
500
3
o
500
CXI
0CT
490
</>
T TOP
u
6'
ROADWAY DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES IN TUNNEL
490
/
OF LIMESTONE 2
480
a
•36'PIPE
UNNEL PROFILE GRADE
480
SE : TUNNEL 'LANS
FOR DETA LS
:
— o
lO <o
470
470
3^'^WRcTf~
or» s e * E R ~ P
PE
B0T TOM OF T INNEL
S =
460
460
395' 2-36 •RC
P ST
SEWER p PE
S = 2.25Z
253' 2-36*RCP
S£*ER PF
PIPE
s
ja
450
11
$2
13
450
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE 1 AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CCNTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
°°°0 ;r°ToL5807 •/.
STA
EL
K =
L
440
= 122+26.00
- 447.78'
401
= 2,240.00'
440
in,
430
430
-S,\
ft
**
420
CM O
CP
CO
CM
CO
O
m ^
CO
—*
/OR
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
/
DATE:
DESCRIPTION
_
LD CT>
•S) CM
CP ro
CP
CM
CP:
CM
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
115+00
REV.
CM
CP ro
a.
LEAD ENGINEER
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
420
o =
A.
•Po/-,
at.
120+00
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DATE
WV|
r=50*
Z / ANDREW P
FREY
PE-28991
: I
CONSTRUCTION |
Indiana Finance Authority
Y1-''
\ -
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES"
/DRC
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JCO
APF
DRAWNCHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
KY84I
r=5'
DATE
I :
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 114 + 00 TO STA. 124 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R01 RDY 4I042
SHEET NO.
VERSION
R-00
570
560
560
550
550
540
540
EXISTING jROUND
ALONG LINE •KY841
520
J
TOP OF L MESTONE
510
520
510
r
500
TOP
rUNNEL
\
\
500
OP OF SHALE I
\
490
490
CM
»-
7=
x
< CO
; EN
480
00
O
K Ki"l°
IX)
UI UJ
S? ULUT
co o
in ®
in ua _*
T I- in
. O IN RO
<UJ
Q:2
HZ
\
oo
C+)l.5807 '/.
\
PROFILE GRADE
470
LI.1
\
^ UJ UJ
X
460
460
OH10 RIVER 500
YR WSE =_457X)0 _
1
24-STORM
SEWER PIPE
O
-
T\\
-18* STORM
SEWER PIPE
450
18* S
SEWE
480
rO
5 S J
o o O r-
470
R>
OKLLFL
TOP OF LIMESTONE 2
X * IU-C
. <M
S = 0.
206'-66'STORM SEWER P
"
XN
450
-
620 66' STORM SEWER
PE
^ v.
440
- TUNNEL PROFILE GRADE
*>
24* STORM
SEWER PIPE
4'-66" STORM
SEWER PIPE
= 0.50X
BOTTOM OF TUNNEL
430
?, 2
44®. S«5HE§£T
335'-66" STORM
SEWERPIPE
S = 0.46/.
430
ll'-66" STORM
SEWER PIPE
S = 0.50'/.
420
4 40
§H VO *
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
I. TOP OF SHALE I AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
420
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
410
410
o o
-,o
UU
UU
•,<p
CM
O =
ID —
— .X
ID
—
ID -
ID
—
<D
~
_R
en
INI
CD
CM
REV.
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
0• :r
IN O
M ID
ID
CM
ID
— CM
ID CM
CM
125+00
LEAD ENGINEER
G>.<
400
400
_
c
ID ; CM
03/26/2014
135+00
130+00
DESCRIPTION
CX FKP.'"'
DATE
w
CONSTRUCT O N
Q,
f-.'
ANDREW P
FREY
•-•P.
PE-28991
-Q
X'ONAL^X
'IN'
03/26/2014
DiTE
RESPONSIBLE
ore
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JCQ
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
f
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
r=50'
Indiana Finance Authority
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
1-5-
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 124 + 00 TO STA. 136 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO
03/26/20)4
PPF0I2
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 41020
SHEET NO
56
oi
36!
VERSION
R-00
T-JSmta-
STA 125+46.96. 222.38'LT
BEGIN CHAIN LINK FENCE
TYPE I
O
O
-J
a
*»
9,
TEMP. ESMT. FOR ORAINAGE CONST.
I
/— PERM. ESMT. FOR DRAINAGE 8. ACCESS *
BEGIN PAVED DITCH TY I STA 124+90
_ —N A
LT)
A
^—PERM. ESMT. FOR DRAINAGE
TEMP. ESMT. FOR
SAFETY WALL CONST..
BUILDING REMOVAL
AND REVEGETATION
/
5X
CONSTR. LIMITS
O
O
O
+
O
, RN
/
RA L
IW0S
SINGLE FACE
BARRIER
PROPFL
C.A.
R/W
/
STA. 125+02.50
END SINGLE FACED BARRIER"
GU
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR
I'IHE A
L
\
^DFIBOA
a
STA. 124+90.OC
BEGIN SINGLE
FACED BARRIER
TA, 124+9Q.QQ
ND TUNNEL
HAIN LINK FENCE
STA 133+88.73 235.02'LT
BEGIN CHAIN LINK FENCE
TEMP. ESMT. FOR STREAM
RELOCATION AND REVEGETATION
END
#r
§TA. T34+69.88
END END TREATMENT
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
SAFTEY WALL S4
WATER GATE
ISEE KYTC STANDARD RFG-010-04)
A
SLOPE LIMITS
END PAVED DITCH TYPE I
STA 135+00
STA. 134+96.63
BEGIN STD INTERGRAL CURB
GUARDRAIL
STD INTERGRAL CURB
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
VNORTH PORTAL DITCH
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAILS
DWG. NO. PDS043 & PDS044)
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
CURVE
•KY84l*-2
STA. 125+17.88
131+92.86
GUARDRAIL
BEG •I END TREATMENT 1
'
-<
o
TYPE
BEGIN UJAHURA1L
S4
RDRAIL
DITCH 10-LT
END TREATMENT TYPE I
_ __
CNJ —
MEDIAE BARR
TYPE I2B L
UO
i\
'
£
MEDIAN BARRI
MTUI.
PE I2B
TYPE
S4-A2-49
/ ^
LINE •KY84P
- _ _•+—
=
70:1 BARRIER TAPER I/)
LJJ
•&>
70:1 BARRIER TOPER
NOTE:
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
aiiil Pi
HF
MIM EL
' \
4' P PE
STOSJ
EN TREA
S4-A2-50
STA. 125+05.00
STA
BAHHLFCR
-SINGLE FACEO
BARRIER
—'5T A. 124+90.00
BEGIN SINGLE FACED
BARRIER
^BEGIN' P AVED DITCH TYPE »
STA 124+90
- AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
RET WALL R17 RFTT®
• STA. 128+36.60
END END TREATMENT
TYPE \ "
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
•-
SLOPE LMTS
^000
- WE T
0*
/\
tot
S4-A2-
PROP R/
^
CHAIN LINK FENCE
Mi
-CSM
VS,'
-*o\
SEE DWG. NO.—
PDS046 FOR \
DETAILS
\
C.A
GY- -
£ •>
3
Q "
2
\
CURVE •KY84P-2 DATA
=
113+85.01
PI STA
: 103,445.7375
N
: 46,669.6429
E
=
12* 44'14.52* (RT)
A
0- 35' 26.44D
— 9. 700.C0'
R
2,156.40'
L
: 1.082.66'
T
: 60.23'
E
e
2.20X
D.S.
70 MPH
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
/arc
/&S
''fa
\P
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGWEER
PPL022
S4-A2-52A
STA. 133+35.00. (59.81'RT.) (KY84I)
CURB INLET TYPE B
S4-A2-46
STA. 125+07.88. (22.50'LT.) (KY84D
MANHOLE TYPE B
S4-A2-49
STA. 127+11.53, (0.00'LT.) (KY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 5B
S4-A2-52B
STA. 133+35.00. (69.93'RT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-46A
STA. 125+70.00, (25.62'LT.) (KY84I)
CMBBI TYPE 9BI
S4-A2-50
S4-A2-53
STA. 127+11.53. ,81.23' RT.) (KY84I)
STA. 133+53.25. (69. 79'RT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 7 (MODIFIED) MANHOLE TYPE C (BYPASS STRUCTURE)
S4-A2-47
STA. 125+07.88, (72.22'RT.) (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE A
S4-A2-52
S4-A2-53A
STA. 134+35.24. (57.38'RT.) (KY841) STA. 133+68.42. (69.68'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE A
MANHOLE TYPE C (MANUAL VALVE)
CONSTRUCTION
PL019
KY 841
S4-A2-48
STA. 127+11.53. (81.26'LT.) (KY841)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
\\v
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
TEMP. ESMT. FOR 8UILDINC
REMOVAL AND REVEGETATION
S4-A2-45
STA. 125+07.88, (28.48'RT., (KY84D
MANHOLE TYPE C (MODIFIED,
DESCRIPTION
%
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
CO3
TEMP. ESMT. FOR
CONST. AND
REVEGETATION
\
32
II
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
GUARDRAIL
STOFTW
STD 1NTERGRAL - CURB
NOISE BARRIER N3
_J O
J IS
!:--b'PiPjr
^-EN
BEGIN GUARDRAIL .
>
24' PIPE—'
END PAVED DITCH TYPE
STA ,33+31.28
.
" :^R ;"EN0 TREATMENT TYPE 1
— RET WALL RI7A
AESTHETIC CABLE RAILING
INTERGRAL CURB
STA. 133+32.39
\END END.TREATMENT
STA. 130+11.58
END GUARORAIL
BEGIN END TREATMENT
TYPE 2A"
PROP NOISE
•—1S4-A2-5
S4-A2-54
SMI
SEE SHEETS PDS008 FOR
MEDIAN BARRIER TAPER
INFORMATION.
LJ
S4-A2-
——
—
5
'
*2
ID
P -'XP*
CJ
V
L
IT N 41- 43' 21.01' W
/
STA. 124+90.0
BEGIN MEDIAN
BARRIER
Y _ __
L
—
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
-A2-4€
S1-A2-45
C
RSJ
124+90.00
BEGIN MEDIAN
BARRIER
X
REATMENT TYPE 2A
S4-A2-54
STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM & SPILL
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (VORTECHS PCI42I OR
APPROVED EOUAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.)
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAILS PDS046 FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION)
ZPPL020
S4-A2-55A
STA. 134+85.37. (57. 71'LT.) (KY84I)
FLUME INLET TYPE 2
PPL021
ppL023
PPL024
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
l" =50'
VZ -
!
ANDREW P.
FREY
PE-28991
-.O
ARC
WZ
PNAL Jjtv
"II""
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
LJM
QT0
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
N/A
KY84I
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWING DATE
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 124 + 00 TO STA. 136 + 00
03/26/2014
PPL013
55
oi
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 41011
R-00
361
o
o
»r
o
\j
IX)
•P05
\
•POST
-SPFCIV
421. SO
PERM. ESMT. FOR
DRAINAGE
V"
SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS
FOR DITCH INFORMATION
- TIP
LET ~ — - -
PROP
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE AL
STA. 136+94.88
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE AL
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
POS"
PCS"
T
Y— PERM. ESMT. FOR
/
DRAINAGE \
STA. 136+72.28, 217.30'LT
END CHAIN LINK FENCE
BEGIN WOVEN WIRE FENCE
TYPE I
STA. 137+10.25
END STD INTEGRAL CURB
N
•POST
50'
"o
'
100'
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS
•PCS
R/
•rOS
o*.
\
\
WOVEN WIRE FENCE
TYPE' 1
-SLOPE LIMITS -
*
STD INTERGRAL CURB
GUARDRAILMEDIAN BARRIE
TYPE I2B
•POST
421.60
S
•POS:
\
.CYEM
m
PROP. R/W & C. A.
-»
s;
^2
-9
z
•PC ST
O
O
n
WOVEN WIRE FENCE S
AND AESTHETIC FENCE,~
SEE LANDSCAPE PCANS
UD
ro
O
o
A2
S4-A2-55B
rs»
KY 841 SOUTHB
7Q.-I BARRIFR
NTPFH
CO
s
_
7IS.I RARR1FP
RAPER
C_)
UJ
NOTE;
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
L
/ BEGIN BRIDGE
—/STA. 137+37.07 60.22* RT
EL.-' /.BEG. NOISE BARRIER N4
^-/STA. 137+23.77 65.52'RT
/ END NOISE BARRIER N3
WSTA. 137+14.08/^
/ BEGIN APPROACH SLAB.Z-" ^
GUARDRAILS~D INTERGRAL CURB
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
A2 533
\
fo*
—1
XX
2. SEE HARRODS CREEK BRIDGE
PACKAGE FOR BRIDGE SCUPPER
LOCATIONS.
NOISE BARRIER N3B
•POST
t*!Kl
'•P3£T
£R*VI
-V
AESTHETIC FENCE
SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS
^
CJ
OPE L M TS
HAIN 'C^ F|NCE
&
1. SEE SHEETS DS009 FOR
MEDIAN BARRIER TAPER
INFORMATION.
=^TQRM
STORM
• 34
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
STA. 137 +10.2
END CURB
CO
5
LINE -KY84I-
S4-A2-56B
S4 A2
RCP
MEDIAN BARRIER-*
TYPE I2B
STA 136+94.88
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARD CONNECTOR
TYPE A
POST
/r
/
c
St
-ft
NOISE BARRIER N3
CDO
X#-'-OP)/
VXR .'
YEONTAE
I : |
JEONG
| :
VSA
PE-29310
/OR 5
-x*
PROP. R/W ¥ C. A.
/ft/.-
--o
K/ -•
/
fci
_J Q
03/26/2014
!o
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
S2
PPL022
PL0I9
KY 841XEEE3Z5ZE2
t?
n
u
S4-A2-53B
STA. 137+00.00. 043.72'RT.) (KY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE C
S4-A2-56
STA. 136+85.00, (57.33'RT.) (KY84I)
CURB BOX INLET TYPE B
S4-A2-55
STA. 136+85.00. (57.33' LT.) (KY84I)
CURB BOX INLET TYPE B
S4-A2-56B
STA. 136+85.00. (50.25'RT.) (KY841)
JUNCTION BOX
S4-A2-55B
STA. 136+85.00. (50.25'LT.) (KY84I)
JUNCTION BOX
S4-A2-57
STA. 137+34.00. (141.51'RT) (KY84I)
66' HEADWALL 0* SKEW
PPL020 PPL023
PPL02I
PPL024
.lIlU'lll,.
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
wv
CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE
VI-
^03/26/2014
ANDREW P
FREY
PE-2899'
/£c
DESIGNED:
JCO
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
L" = 50'
27026
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
N/A
KY84I
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 136 + 00 TO STA. 147 + 00
03/26/2014
PPL0I4
57
of
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 ROY 4I0I2
R-00
36!
530
530
520
520
510
500
S-
§
T UJ
£R
s_
Q- +
t/1 l/l
490
490
x *
i- o o
._• o O
480
PROFILE GRADE
sa
480
LU UJ
o
1.5807
470
470
460
0HIC
u*:
450
GO
RIVER 500 YR WSE = 457.00
460
7
HARR DDS CREEK 100 YR W 5E = 4 2.17
WI7H OHIO RIVEERI 8ACKWA' ER
100 ' R FLOW = 25.190 CF
l/>
N
450
O
440
440
u
5s= 0.
J35'-66
SEWER PI
430
u
/
OR^I
/
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG LINE 'KY841
S = 0.46'/.
430
r
420
32'-66' STORM
SEWER PIPE
S-= OrlfrX
TOP OF SHALE
IPE
(SIIZE UNKNOWN)
"20
HARR 0DS CREEK
V""T
\
" 418.80-
NORMAL POOL ELEV—^
410
410
400
400
IE
NOTE:
TOP OF LIMESTONE. TOP OF LIMESTONE
1. TOP OF SHALE I AND TOP OF
LIMESTONE 2
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY
AND ARE BASED ON RID DOCUMENT
INFORMATION AND/OR BORINGS WHERE
AVAILABLE. THESE ARE SUPPLIED TO
THE CCNTRACTOR FOR INFORMATION
ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REFLECTIVE OF
THE ACTUAL SUBSURFACE FIELD
CONDITIONS.
3 2
• IN
•f-.'
•r«3/
£ «
F-1
o o
uo
uo
-~0
--T>
1
*i=
tr> r*~!
L£> I CM
(M I/L
_• lf>
2I
a. d.
ro m
—
c
CD
F-
CD IC
_• 3
—
O
IX) . CM
°
CM
O
in
CP
o
ro vD
r- j ro
<\J
CM
CM
CD
CP
OJ
ro
CD
140+00
_
CO
ro
YEONTAE
JEONG
'E-29310
I
IOT
!fU
„ f(U.
X
CD
CC
co cn
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
145+00
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
HORIZONTAL SCALE
wv
CONSTRUCTION
l"
I<O/
Y-'~
: / ANDREW P. T ^
: !
FREY
I :
Z3\
PE-28991
/ARC
-3>\
/&S
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES*
DESIGNED:
JCO
DRAWN:
DATE
LJM
y/\ Indiana Finance Authority
J
BRIDGE FILE
=50'
27026
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
r=5*
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 136 + 00 TO STA. 147 + 00
DRAWING DATE
KY84!
DWG. NO.
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 4I02I
SHEET NO.
VERSION
R-00
CURVE
=
PI STA
=
N
=
E
=
A
=
D
=
R
L
*
=
T
=
E
e
D.S.
'EMERACCESS'-I DATA
CURVE 'EMERACCESS'-2 DATA
60+66.14
STA
= 65+24.75
105.977.5763
= 106.207.7629
44,299.7034
= 43.900.7249
29' 35' 20.82' (RT)
= 26* 24' 37.80' (RT)
33' 42'12.24'
= 8' I8'I3.45'
170.00'
= 690.00'
318.06'
87.79'
44.90'
161.90'
5.83'
18.74'
NC
NC
N/A
N/A
D.S.
STA. 149+46.25
END SB APPROACH SLAB
CURVE 'EMERACCESS'-3 DATA
STA
= 68+29.69
N
= 106.466.5277
43.728.7555
81' 53'04.70'(RT)
33' 42'12.24'
O
170.00'
O
242.96'
147.48'
O
LD
55.06'
NC
N/A
D.S.
— STA. 149+50.75
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CURB
\
GATE
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-I-
RET WALL R21
O
S4-A4-21tf>
CHANNEL LINING
CLASS IV
55.0'x23u0-'x3.0'
rCTACED
IER, — —
^sas-^lTCH
\\
BEGIN IMPERMEABLEAQAYER
STA. 151+43.65 (KY8*\
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAI\\C
DS045)
,—STA. 151+60.75 oA\
/
END STD.
LJ1 \'
/
INTEGRAL CURB + \
4-A4-I8
RI6
s
<S)
S
sT
NOISE BARRIER N3B—^
—
E
-A4-
END TREATMENT
IYPt I
TA. 151+28.61
ND GUARDRAIL
GIN END TREATMENT
N
3
D T
R
E
A
A4
PIPE
GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR
TYPE Al
-O SEE LANDSCAPING PL*
vSJ FOR DITCH INFORMATION
SEE NOTE
•7
C. A.
SEE NOTE
s^
CURVE "SHAREDUSE'-I DATA
=
75
STA
50+83.57
= 105.961.1969
N
E
44.282.0689
=
29' 35'20.82'(RT)
A
=
28* 38'52.40'
D
=
R
200.00'
103.29'
L
=
T
52.82'
=
E
6.86'
= NC
e
r N/A
D.S.
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-2 DATA
PI STA
55+22.72
= 106.181.8338
N
S
43.899.6428
E
23' 44' 35.97'(RT)
A
=
8' 02'09.15'
D
R
713.00'
=
295.47'
L
T
149.88'
=
15.58'
E
: NC
e
=
N/A
D.S.
CURVE 'SHARE0USE'-4 DATA
PI STA
61+46.02
N
106.560.8286
43.416.2214
E
A
51' 14' 11.94' (RT)
17' 37' 46.09'
D
R
325.00'
290.63'
L
Dd
T
gfy 55 + Od
E
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
e
D.S.
NC
N/A
REV.
DESCRIPTION
PE
«
'
T
PT 69+25.1
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
LINE "KY841"
N 41' 43' 21.01' W
I
C
5
KJ
X-
24'PIP
24'PIPE
5. SEE SHEET PDS010 FOR ADDITIONAL
TAPER INFORMATION.
6. SEE ITS PLANS FOR DETAILS.
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
7. SEE SHEET PPL023 FOR RIVER ROAD
ORAINAGE.
0/?!/
?<•
S4 A 4
o
DITCH 13.RT
v——
STA. 155+46.^5
END TEMP. MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE 9T
S4-A4-B
24' PI
1
o
— CRASH CUSHION
~-TYPE VI-C
MEDIAN BARRIER
9T
STORM
3. THE FIRST SECTION OF TEMPORARY
BARRIER SHALL BE PINNED TO THE
PAVEMENT AT BOTH ENDS. PINS
SHALL BE REMOVEABLE.
4. AT THE END OF BOTH PERMANENT
TRANSITIONS. CAST THE CONNECTION
DETAIL SHOWN IN RBM-115-08 INTO
THE PERMANENT BARRIER TO
CONNECT IT TO THE TEMPORARY
BARRIER.
END IMPERMEABLE LAYER
STA. 155+55.88 (KY841)
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS045)
BEGIN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
STA. 150+34.83
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS045)
STA. 150+06.13 END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE Al. BEGIN GUARDRAIL
A4
S4 A 4
T£MP MEDIAN
ARRIER TYPE 9T
BARR
STA. 156+26.55
BEGIN TEMP. MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE 9T
.—•
lPl_JCH ll-R-J
m
KY841* =
'55+87
9+62.30 'EMERAC
-CRASH CUSHION
TYPF Vl-C
P0T»69+62.30
70:1 TAPER
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
Pt~ZS
^^^'
2. TO INSURE THAT TEMPORARY
BARRIER CLOSES THE GAP BETWEEN
PERMANENT BARRIER PRECISELY. AT
ONE END OF THE PERMANENT
BARRIER RUN. DO NOT CAST THE
FINAL 25' OF PERMANENT BARRIER
OR THE 50:1 TRANSITION UNTIL
ATTENUATORS AND ALL TEMPORARY
BARRIER IS PLACED.
o
o
n,ITCH 12-1 T
SKEW
70sI TAPER
I Trt I
STA. 151+82.8
BEGIN TEMP.
EDIAN BARRIER
El
S4^ 4-1]
30'
TA
jL
r- FOR MEDIAN BARRIER
TRANSITION, SEE
SHEET PDS036
1. TEMPORARY BARRIER IS TO BE
PLACED THROUGH THE STATION
RANGE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. UP TO
ONE ADDITIONAL 20' SECTION MAY
BE PLACED TO MEET THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENT.
P/P£
STqr
NOISE BARRIER
N3C
S4-A4-9
POND B
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
POND
/Q:
RET WALL RI3
>5
-STA. 149+90.75
BEGIN CURB
STA. 149+86.92
END NB APPROACH SLAB
STA. 149+66.42
END NB BRIDGE
S4-A4-7
STA. 153+04.68. (172.11'RT.) (KY841)
POND CONTROL STRUCTURE (DBI TY7 MOD)
S4-A4-8
\
STA. 155+39.QO, 029.68' RT.) (KY84IL>W^
MANHOLE TYPE'.B
"
tl
*
-
03/26/2014
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
STA. 156+66.12
362.95' RT
/
\
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
pROPTRT^
PPL022
PL019
KY 84)
C.A.
S4-A4-I0
STA. 68+83.44. (27.81'RT.) (EMERACCESS)
METAL END SECTION TYPE 1(4:1)
S4-A4-6
STA. 153+05.11, (150.52'RT.XKY84I)
MANHOLE TYPE B
\
CONC. PAVED DITCH TYPE 1
W/ 6'BOTTOM WIDTH (TYP.)
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
SLOPE CONST
CONST* F0R
SLOPE
S4-A4-9
STA. 157+83.75. (184.93' RT.) (KY84I)
POND OUTLET STRUCTURE (DBI TY 7 MOD)
STA. 158+92.15
END TEMP. MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE 9T
^
SLOPE LIMITS
STA. 153+49.23
334.04' RT
Outfall S4-A4-4A
li
CURVE 'SHARE0USE'-3 DATA
57+89.37
PI STA
106.400.2727
N
43.739.3342
E
az sc
27' 18'09.82'(LT)
A
12' 43'56.62'
0
I
I
450.00'
R
o •
214.44'
L
109.29'
T
13.08'
E
NC
e
N/A
D.S.
\
UARDRAIL
•Co
A4
XX-
91 #/-'<">•
NOTES:
BEGIN IMPERMEABLE LAYER
STA. 156+13.88 (KY84I)
(SEE gRAINAGEyDETAIL PDS045)
1
PUSU3b
^
SEE NOTE 6 ON THE—
GENERAL NOTES
DITCH
1
SHEET
RR-L.
ITS CAMERA
TOWER FENCE
(SEE NOTE 6)
XX
M -S-HV-
>—LINE 'SHAREDUSE'
STA. 67+33.01, END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
TERMINAL SECTION NO. I
Z
S4,,—DIICH ILLI
MIDDLETON RUN 6'x5' BOX CULVERT
END STD. INTEGRA!, CURq
32
o
' <*
t+JU
TAPER
BA
MEDIA.'; BARRIER
—TYPE I2B
STA. 150+
END GUAR!
T
S4-A4-1
S3
If
S4-A4-2A
MEOIAN BARRIER
rYPE I2B
GUARDRAIL
FOR MEDIAN BARRIER
IRAN5T
bbb SHbbl
N
DITCH MP-I
GUARDRAIL
j—STA. 68+26.36
/
END GUARDRAIL
+ /
/•
g? -a f
— 579'6'x5'
U &
MIDDLETON RUN p £
CREEK BOX CUL/gRT^
.vvor-™p- "•
5T0«U=
4-A4-2B-^
V
CURVE
•SHAREDUSE'-2
URVE
:MERGACCESS'-2
CURVE "EMERGACCESS'-3 •
GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR
TYPE A
S4=A4
STQgWr
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
-GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
-RET HALL
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-3
AESTHET
JQ
STA. 67+17.00 i
END SINGLE FACBD BARRIER
BEGIN GUARDRAIL^
BEGIN. WOVEN WlRfl FENCE
-X—
?r^3.^S4-A4-20
STA.
150+52.97
230.15' LJ
AESTHETIC
FENCE.
SEE
LANSCAPE O
PLANS
O
+
o
o
S>
cQY-
LIMITS
9\ ri
S*
J&\/
If)
r—STA. 152+90.36
/
3pW3S' LT
/
/—DITCH MP-2
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-4
0^
rjiSLOPE
O
S4-A4-I9
CURVE 'EMERGACCESS'-I—i
s
S4-A4-3
STA. 150+50.00, (79.04'RT.) (KY841)
OROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A4-5
STA. 151+34.68. 068.39'RT.XKY84I)
24' HEADWALL 0' SKEW
S4-A4-2B
STA. 150+00.00,-150.25' LT.XKY84I)
JUNCTIOl^BOX
I X
STA. 149+66.13
END GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE*
BEGIN GUARDRAIL .
STA. 149+26.42 END SB BRIDGE—i
PROP.
S4-A4-2
STA. 150+00.00, (57.33'LT.) (KY84I)
CURB BOX INLET TYPE B
S4-A4-2A
STA. 151+50.00. (77.61'LT.XKY84I)
OROP BOX INLET TYPE I
25' TRANSITION C0NC
BARRIER TO CURB
PROP RET WALL R22
STA. 61+31.83 10.00'LT—x
BEGIN BARRIER
S4-A4-I
STA. 150+00.00. (57.33' RT.HKY841)
CURB BOX INLET TYPE B
S4-A4-1B
STA. 150+00.00. (50.25'RT.) (KY84I)
JUNCTION BOX
O O
o o
S4-A4-I1
STA. 68+96.41. (28. 76'LT.) (EMERACCESS)
METAL END SECTION TYPE 1(4:1)
S4-A4-I9
STA. 63+35.00. (50.30'LT.) (EMERACCESS)
SLOPED BOX OUTLET TYPE I
S4-A4-I8
STA. 63+35.00. (14.00'RT.) (EMERACCESS)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
S4-A4-20
STA. 58+75.00. (10.93'RT.) (SHAREDUSE)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
TEMP
ESMT'
F0R
SLOPE' CONST..
STREAM RELOCATION
AND REVEGETATION
'PPL020
PPL02I
pPL023
PPL024
S4-A4-2I
STA. 58+75.00. (37.35'LT.) (SHAREDUSE)
METAL END SECTION TYPE 3
BRIDGE RLE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
w
CONSTRUCTION
\tc-
^03/26/2014
ANDREW
FREY
VP.
-o
m
DESIGNED:
JCO
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
l'=50'
27026
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 147 + 00 TO STA. 159 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/20)4
PPL0I5
59
of
OYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 4IOI3
R-00
361
550
520
520
CRIVER ROAD
STA 148+36.91
STA = 156+20.00
EL
8
510
8
<r
S
CC
f-
= 501.43'
9g
bCHcc
BOO. 00
ffl
i/> —
•~OiO
J) m<r>
L
51
ts>
o
(+11.5807 •/.
PROFILE GRADE
«-)0 3809 V.
500
O
o
•s> -
o
490
•n
480
490
wi
480
I A.
24' STORM
SEW ER PIPE
t/T
LlJ
47'-24" STORM
SEWER PIPE
S = 0.50'/.
470
m
LD
470
24* STORM
PIPE
SEW
CJ
460
460
OHIO RIVER 500 YR WSE = 451.00
V: EX ST N
F-l
MIDD ETON RUN CREEK 100 YR JISE—="452700
WITH OHIO RIVER BACKWATER
R FLOW = 100.5 CFS
RIVER
100
450
7
XISTING GR 3UN0 LONG LINE XY84I'
440
440
430
MIDDLETON RUN BOX CULVERT
I.E. 433.04
J
430
6'X5'1
420
420
410
410
400
400
s
Dd
P
>Q
- .
Z3.\
21
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
,•? v^/cr
* id
Is
T
a £
~
CVJ
<7> lC
CO cD
(T»
RO
cn m
cn m
in
cn m
CO
lO
0>
J-i
co
—
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
155+00
150+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
CONSTRUCTION
frFREY
-3,\
PE-28991
"A \
-,Q.\ ,
_
/A:
yd/
/<O.
03/26/2014
ft
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
LJM
CHECKED:
_APF
CHECKED:
QTJ
T =50'
27026
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
r=5<
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
&EN&S'"in"''—
Indiana Finance Authority]
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 147 + 00 TO STA. 159 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPF014
60
of
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 ROY 41022
R-00
361
S4-A4-I4A
STA. 166+65.33. (42.25'LT.) (KY84I)
JUNCTION BOX
S4-A4-I4
STA. 166+65.33, (48.91' LT.) (KY841)
CURB INLET TYPE B
S4-A4-I4B
O STA. 166+65.33. (36.54'LT.) (KY84I)
O JUNCTION BOX
S4-A4-I6
STA. 166+00.00. (65.67' RT.XKY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE 7
LD S4-A4-I5
<-0 STA. 166+65.33. (48.91'RT.) (KY841)
CURB INLET TYPE B
S4-A4-17
\
STA. 165+87.0). 019.58'RT.) (KY84I)
42" HEADWALL 0" SKEW
O
O
o
LO
WETLANDS (DO NOT DISTURB.
SEE NOTE 3)
tOf>
slop
£
PROP
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
*>/
R/
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-7
O
(O
LO
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-5
AESTHETIC FENCE.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
10
STA. 161+11. II
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN ENO TREATMENT TYPE I
24'FRP (FROM SECTION £
45'SINGLE FACE C0NCRE1
BARRIER
S4-A4-22
pR0p
SEE PDS01I FOR TAPER DETAILS.
24'FRP (FROM APPROACH BRIDGE)
STA. 167+90.00
PGL SHIFT FROM 13.25'
LT AND R
TO CENTERLINE
STA. 166+36.12
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
STA. 162+61.12
ENO END TREATMENT
TYPE 2A
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
END TREATMENT-
33 in
7m
O
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-6
o
/v.
PROP. C. A.
-LYff a
-XX—
18' FRP (FROM SECTION
STA. 166+51.50
END GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
BEGIN 45' SINGLE FACE BARRIER
END FENCE
GUARDRAIL CONNECTOR
TYPE A
DITCH MP-I
END TREATMENT TYPE I
SLOPE LIMITS
L/O/V
END IMPERMEABLE LAYER
STA. 166+51.52 (KY84I)
(SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS045)
LINE 'SHAREOUSE'
-XX
o
4^/)
C£T4
STA. 159+36.0
END END TREATMENT
TYPE 2
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
END TREATMENT
TYPE 2
S4-A4-23
STA. 167+73.00, (48.83' RT.XKY841)
CURB INLET TYPE B
C£°*sr
&
CURVE 'SHARE0USE"-4
S4-A4-22
STA. 167+73.00, (48.83'LT.) (KY841)
CURB INLET TYPE B
S4-A4-I5A
STA. 166+65.33. (43.16'RT.) (KY84I)
JUNCTION BOX
S4-A4-I3
STA. 165+50.00, (71.33' LT.) (KY84I)
DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
DlICH_12rLJ
O
o -
cn
g.
. . ^uardrail
LT)
^^
30LP
STA. 161+50
MEDIAN BARRIER TYPE MB
SEE NOTE
LINE "KY84I"—v
STA.165+20
BEGIN 30'I0sl SLOPE
(/)
o
S4- A4-I4B
CURB
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
S4-A4-I5A
S4-A4-15
w
1—GUARDRAIL
S4-A4-I6
DITCH 13-RT
FOR MEDIAN BARRIER
TRANSITIONS. SEE
SHEET DS036
n
STD...INTEGRAL
SI
END TREATMENT TYPE I
STA. 162+32.63
END END TREATMENT TYRE I
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
FENCE,
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
\
LU
^
NOTE:
PI
UARDRA1L
TYPE A
— TOLL GANTRY
POST ;<
1. SEE KY APPROACH BRIDGE PACKAGE
FOR BRIDGE SCUPPER LOCATIONS.
2. CONSTRUCT
MEDIAN BARRIER
TYPE I4A FROM STA 163+30.00 TO
STA 165+30.00.
3. PLACE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE
FENCING ADJACENT TO THE WETLAND
ALONG THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF
WAY LINE.
CJ>
STA/ 168+23.00
BEGIN BRIDGE
42' PIPE
-ft*
\= AESTHETIC
O
o
/!
36' PIPE''
S4- A4-I4A
N 41' 43' 21.01'W
3
LD
A
END 30'10:1 SLOPE
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
.-S)
•
e
ONNECTOR
Sf*ri67+82.62
END GUARDRAIL
BEGIN GUARDRAIL
CONNECTOR TYPE A
A4
-27* FRP (FROM APPROACH BRIDGE)
c_>—TOLL GANTRY
i+61.77
'—STA. 166+C
BEGIN « TD
INTEGRI L CURB
POND
/<£
END IMPEI MEABLE LAYER
STA. 166+58.61 (KY841)
(SEE DRAHAGE DETAIL PDS045)
•PO
s
s
CP
?o
03/26/2014
AESTHETIC FENCE,
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
-5!
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
IFOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
\
PPL022
0o
s: *
£ c
1-g
a "
E£
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
PL019
KY 841
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-4 DATA
= 61+46.02
STA
N
= 106,560.8286
= 43,416.2214
E
= 51* 14' 11.94' (RT)
A
= 17' 37' 46.09'
D
= 325.00'
R
= 290.63'
L
= 155.84'
T
= 35.43'
E
= NC
e
= N/A
D.S.
IT
arc
Uj~
UJi
/
\
St
\J~\
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
/
SLOPE LIMITS
i Q
/
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-6 DATA
: 68+04.71
PI STA
=
107,171.3720
N
- 43.140.4118
E
CURVE "SHAREDUSE'-5 DATA
s 64+71.18
PI STA
=
106.899.0434
N
=
43.342.2289
E
: 24* 12'03.56'(LT)
A
s
6' 44'26.45'
D
=
R
850.00'
L
359.03'
=
T
182.23'
19.31'
E
e
NC
— N/A
D.S.
A
D
R
L
T
E
e
D.S.
20' 53'39.23'(RT)
s 6' 44' 26.45'
850.00'
=
309.97'
156.73'
=
14.33'
NC
=
N/A
:
:
CURVE 'SHAREDUSE'-7 DATA
=
PI STA
70+22.79
- 107.384.7249
N
; 43,080.6533
E
— 26' 04'31.27'(LT)
A
20' 27-46.00'
D
R
280.00'
- 127.43'
L
=
64.84'
T
7.41'
E
=
NC
e
=
N/A
D.S.
-ILL
DESCRIPTION
\\V|
^03/26/2014
A\3HBV,
CP
FREY
28991
-„Q
arc
Uj;
<OC
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
LJM
^4
CONSTRUCTION
HI1"
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
in
) -r~i
i£> r~-
'PPL020
PPL02I
ppL023
PPL024
HORIZONTAL SCALE
BRIDGE FILE
l' = 50'
I265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
KY841
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 159 + 00 TO STA. 171 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPL016
61
of
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 ROY 41014
R-00
361
550
550
540
530
530
520
520
STA 16 F+90.00
PGL SHIFT FROM 13.25
LT ANC RT TO ENTERLINE
510
510
O
Min
•OCD
~o
- iX>
RSsp
PROF
E GRADE
I- 0.9809 V.
490
STA = 167+90.0C
= 492. 5 4 5
BA
X> CD CO
cn
in -•4 —
(-J0.9809
l/>
u
6l'-42 STORM
SEWER PIPE
S = 0 982.
470
f
460
500
+)0.5
GO
(+)0.5 30
42- STORM
SEWER P PE
480
67+90.00
EL AHE ID = 492
O
-•r-T—'
500
STA =
480
IQ6'jJ8" STORM
SEWER F IPE
S = 2.4
CJ
42'STORM
SEWER P PE
STA = 166+15.00
490
470
67
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG LI IE "KY841
K = 20?
3 1 0.00'
OHIO RIVER 500 YR
= 457.0
450
/
450
OHIO RIVER 100 YR WSE = 451.82
100 YR FLOW = 812,000 CFS
440
460
\
440
V
Yr 7- 1
430
430
420
420
4I0
4I0
5
§
§5
i Q
St
So
-a!
£
R :
: {
Z3X
400
400
R-T
NOTE:
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
I.
PIER LOCATIONS ARE UNDER DEVELOPMENT
SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR DETAILS.
x *
—
c
r-
O
O s
o. a.
CM
C
Ip
—•
<r
«T
160+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
-
in c
_
CM
CM
M"
CT> M
CM O
CM CM
-• o
cn o
_
o
f-
<M
CM if)
CM RO
IN
VP
^R
VP
ro o
ro IN
(P VP
T
CO
VP CM
ro T
CP in
M-
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
CM
o
CM
T
zz
CM
O
CP
CM
RO
V
M"
vP
ro
T
CP
RO
*P
CP
CM
^ | M"
03/26/2014
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
170+00
165+00
DESCRIPTION
VP
CO
ro
CP
03/26/2014
Tl'
ASDREV.
FREY
28991
or;
tc-
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
'"II""
JCQ
APF
Indiana Finance Authority]
fa
CHECKED:
L JM
QTJ
BRIDGE RLE
T = 50'
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
P=5'
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
(FOR DRAINAGE ELEMENTS ONLY)
HORIZONTAL SCALE
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 159 + 00 TO STA. 171 + 00
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG NO.
03/26/2014
PPF0I5
62
OI
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JDT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 41023
R-00
361
o
o
+
o
o
o
+
in
PROP. R/W & C. A.
-H-
—*
00
-0"
H0H
%c
-H-
*•
. \
-)fr
£
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
-£=
-C
1
3
IR
rt!T
"T
-»
\v \
V,
FC—I
-3«-
\
S
CI
1
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
T
-8-
+=
-C
LINE -KY84I1
>J 41* 43' 21.01* W
F
HB-
»
-XX-
R/W & C.A.
"36(-
-XX-
\
LWC SLUDGE POND
C3
il
J12
32
CVJ
o
/•V
u
m
O
—J
_J
Q_
Q_
Q_
O
o /
<
!<
*+
-I J
o o
UO
O'O1
T
oc
KY
o
c\
w
—I
Q-
ii
in
o
—I
A
LiQ.
PPL022
1 —| ~zr
o o
v—'
U
Q-
O.
—1
_L
/ /o
/ /o
\ / - . o
//f
PPL020
PPL021
OH
PPL0I9
ppL023
PPL024
o =
K £.
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION
wv
CONSTRUCTION
VL-
03/26/2014
ANDREW
FREY
-7>
28931
--O
''fpNA^y
'"III"'
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
JCO
APF
f
Indiana Finance Authority]
CHECKED:
LJM
QTJ
BRIDGE FILE
l' =50'
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
KY84I
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
HORIZONTAL SCALE
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 171 + 00 TO STA. 183 + 00
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPL0I7
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 RDY 41015
63
oi
361
VERSION
R-00
540
530
520
!
I:
•
I I
"I
I
5I0
I
I
I
*
|F— P R0FILE CRJ DE
500
I
•
L
I
490
I
I
L
500
—I—
E •
_L;_
I
•
I
: 1
—I—
1 :
I
480
]
I
•
H
—I
I
I
1
I
|
I
—1
490
J
1
1
~
—
1
' I
;
u
-
o
1
o
+
t :
"TO­
GO
1
470
S
S
+
R-
£+ RO
U
< CL
TL/> a>
<
VOLT
460
S
CVJ
7
S
2 IN
•
S
£A
< CL
I/> w>
2A
< CL
2
<
tV)
r-
<
I—
GO
S V0
+
i—
1/5
en
y
ST
LD
Z
1
!U
OHIO RIVER 50
—
o
. — 1-
o
+
450
|
440
.
" iI
i•
430
-
I
—
-
«
~ T ~ "
EXISTING G ROUND
A LONG LINE •KY84I"
C_>
I—
<
1—
i~l
n
I
;I
j
i- — •
4-J
i
1-
LD
Z
_J
1
o
-
I
<
I—
GO
1;
YR WSE = 457.00
n
2
I
~R!~
-
<
"HI"
1
t• —
—
-
1—
u
i
^
_ J !_
i
420
4I0
_io
11
li
400
400
; __
j
IF
NOTE:
&
L
I. PIER LOCATIONS ARE UN0ER DEVEL0F MENT.
SEE BRI0GE PLANS FOR DETAILS.
V0
rO
LD
V <P
CP CVJ
V T
ro
CL £
_ CV
LO
T CC
<71 CV.
KD RO
CO CVJ
V co
OR CVJ
*r
T
zz
CC
+-
IN
CC
CP (V.
TX
T
KD <£
ro iN
IN
CP CVJ
T
— CVJ
IN n
IN'
CP I O
RO
co
O
=
IN
CP
(\j
ro
id
CT
>
2
3
ro
O
_
ID
—
CVJ
v0
CO
co
O
—
ro
ro
id
m
ro
ro
id
ro
rO
T
v0
CP
*r
RO
n"
RD
•J
*R
T
crt
V
T
CT>
T
LO
vO
ro
-O
r*-
RO
T
r-
(VI
CO
(P RO
T
_
vO
O
LO
r-*
O
CP
CP
*X
RO
co
*T
*X
ro
GO
CP
*7
^
CVJ
0)0
ro, cvj
kD
O
kd
co
CP
co
CP
vr
CP
—
CP
t
175+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
OR
LEAD ENGINEER
DESCRIPTION
O
p-
VO O
CO
CVJ
CP ^
T
CO
1 CVJ
ZZ CVJ
CP OT
CP RO
^X
L
KD
ro
CO
CP
CP R^
CP ?O
—
O)
_
10
m
CO
RO
_
— <X<
lO
ro
IM
*T
CP
r^
Or
o>
o
o
*X
*T
^X
O
O
in
CSJ
ro
T
CP RO
T
CP ! RO
IN
to
ro
T
O
180+00
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
03/26/2QM
ANDREWP
F3EY
-10
28991
-o
arc
a/-
DESIGNED:
JCQ
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
APF
CHECKED:
L JM
VCENS^
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 171 + 00 TO STA. 183 + 00
HORIZONTAL SCALE
BRIDGE FILE
L' = 50'
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
L"=5*
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
03/26/20'4
PPF0I6
61
of
36I
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
VERSION
JOT 03.03 owe 4.R02 ROY 41021
R-00
o
o
+
in
o
o
+
o
CD
CD
/'\\
•fc.
n a-c.it-
%
%
END SECTION 4 BEGIN SECTION 5
%
50'
•7-
2
•fi.
PERM. ESMT. FOR
DRAINAGE AND REVEGETATION
A\
>lv
\
-K> .
\
TV
\)
5
r
PROP». R/W fc
C.
END CONSTRUCTION
KY 841
STA. 187+40.00
H""V
\
o
o
7®
-W
/<
c
ro
ro
rsj
KY 841 SOUTHBOUND
LINE •KY84I'
I/)
I •
SH
KY 841 NORTHBOUND
r
L
1
a.\
O
^
CJ
V
\
OP-305
\
<I
»—ft PROP. R/W &~D.A.
IF
\s
y \
•P.
•
• ' \
7,
-b>
• IP
y \ v
,\
r
S
PAVED DITCH
i a
s
A
:— INFILTRATION TUNNEL
\A
!0
*;
\ *
32
PPL02?
PL0I9
EEE3EEE3
in i£> r»o o
||
x az
PPL020 PPL023
PPL024
PPL02I
Q i=
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAO ENGINEER
wv,
CONSTRUCTION
Z<of
Z^X
03/26/2014
ViANDREW P.
PREY
PE-28991
Indiana Finance Authority]
CHECKED:
JCQ
APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
BRIDGE FILE
l"=50'
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
N/A
RESPONSIBLE ENGINES"
DESIGNED:
HORIZONTAL SCALE
LJM
QTJ
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PLAN
STA. 183 + 00 TO STA. 187 + 40
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PPL0I8
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 ROY 41016
SHEET NO.
65
Of
361
VERSION
R-00
"
540
540
^SECTION 4 S ECTION 5 ^
530
530
END CONST RUCTIO SJ SECT ION 4
P.O. T. STA 187+4 0.00
LINE 'KY84
ELE /. 502. 56
520
i
\
j
510
520
\
510
\
i
0FILE GRA DE
-jr
500
500
i
—i—
j
490
i
r
i
480
1
470
in
r- r+
0='
UJ.
ST
S
ij
c- •
3+00
< QL
fr­
iz)
_i_
•
CO
.J
<
500
YR
460
WSE = 4 57.00
450
|
LU
Z
T
—L
440
MATCH
440
..
OHIO RI /ER
i
H-
450
470
|
C£
CO UJ
460
480
i
ING GROUNDLINE ALONG LINE "K Y84I-
_
PAVED DITCH
/
LTRATION TUNNEL
!
—L
430
i
r
430
i
f
\,
TRANSYLVANIA BE ACH ROAD-f
420
420
410
410
5
§
s
Jd
P
,
13
CO <
DQ
400
1
400
n
NOTE:
—
<r
t
vD
ro
o
m
o
X
CM
t
cr*
__
10
—
O
in
•
502.11
CO
o
o
m
501.11
115
433.02
500.61
432.02
500.36
,r
i
cv
fT
SO
I' 89
!
ji
429.13
1. PIER LOCATIONS ARE UNDER DEVELOPMENT.
SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR DETAILS.
' t ZB
' 92
**
111
s
S
-*
m
m-
CM c-j
O
in s
CO
-r CM
T
V
CO
CV
s
3
'
185+00
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
/20
LEAD ENGINEER
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
03/26/20M
VS\
ANDREW P
FREY
PE-28991
"-Q,
ft/C
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
"Mil""
JCO
_APF
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
L JM
QTJ
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
LINE "KY841" ROADWAY PROFILE
STA. 183 + 00 TO STA. 187 + 40
HORIZONTAL SCALE
BRIDGE FILE
l" =50'
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
l* =5'
KY84I
DRAWING DATE
03/26/20!4
SHEET NO.
PPF0I7
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 DWG 4.R02 ROY 41025
66
OI
361
VERSION
R-00
%
-A
73
TJ
O.
(S -v
V
c&
&
\0
-
is
°oto
II5'-0*
SPAN I
«£
540'-0'
SPAN 2
\b> ^
i£
540'-0'
SPAN 4
\\ , \
2510
1200
0^3
,^A
Tt-
T7
70
Os
07
g
70
\n
&*&
--SECTION 4 SECTION 5
\ \
70
>
s*
07
\N
o^
MN
\ T ^ ^
C
z_
-7
Xj
&
*
IN
•Jj.
SPAN
SECTION 5 SECTION 6
.|a ii5'-°;
*p5
L
AN
\
—
&
2
PGL
BR DGE
a
PT OF MIN
VERT CLEARANCE
Pi
_ a
N-41 s
£ PIER 2
G
£ PIER 5
%
'v^S^o
\
O
£ TOWER 3
'
WER A
-p
X
FRONT FACE OF BACKWALL
STA. 212+50
x\
"/Ox
KY
C*
-P
PLAN
SCALE: 1* = LOO'-O'
H5'-0
SIMPLE SPAN
STEEL I-GIROER
l200'-0"
£ TOWER A
STA 205+95.00
PGL EL. 511.835
SECTION
0.51%
0.50%
sr-Q' *
£ TRANSYLVANIA
BEACH ROAD
MINIMUM CLEARANCE
71' MIN. VERT. CLEARANCE
-JLn\
V
OHIO RIVER
£ UPPER
RIVER ROAD
o
td bd
J
APPROXIMATE ROCK LINE
52
, , SECTION 5 SECTION 6 , ,
I?
APPROX RIVER BOTTOM
STA 205+14.62
ELEVATION
o
o
o
m
SECTION 4 SECTION 5
6'-6-MIN LAT
CLEARANCE
IIHIBI!
J
IQ39'-2YI* MEASURED ALONG £ BRIDGE
STA 194+75.38
SCALE: I* = lOO'-O'
CM
r
CM
oo
0.50%
VPC
a
SECT ON
NORMAL POOL ELEV. = 418.8'
100 YR. HW
ELEV. = 451.70
0.50%
5
FRONT FACE OF BACKWALL
STA 212+50.00
PGL EL. 516.988
£ PIER 5
STA 211+35.00
PGL EL. 515.772
El. 718.80
EL. 712.80
SECTION 4 SECTION 5
SIMPLE SPAN
STEEL I-GIROER
540'-0"
C TOWER 3
STA 193+95.00
PGL EL. 505.835
£ PIER 2
STA 188+55.00
188+5
PGL EL. 503.135
£ PIER »
STA 187+AO.OO
PGL EL. 502.560
H5'-0
2280'-0' THREE-SPAN STEEL COMPOSITE CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
540'-0'
L25Z
<
VPC
"
NOTES:
VPT 0.51%.
LEGEND:
1. FOR GENERAL NOTES. SEE DWG NOs GN002-GN004.
VPT
2. BRIDGE LENGTHS AND SPAN LENGTHS GIVEN
ARE HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS ALONG CENTERLlNE
OF BRIDGE.
H
II
ROADWAY PROFILE
3. PIER I IS INCLUDED UNDER SECTION 4.
10/07/13
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
w
CONSTRUCTION
r> &-TC06- SX
-T>.
STATE OF
-,o
''III
I0/07/I3
RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
PE11100403
arc
HifJj C
MPL
_[N5_
PRAWN:
ALR
TNS
• INDICATES 360' GREEN CHANNEL CENTER LIGHT
©INDICATES 180" RED CHANNEL MARGIN LIGHT
NOT TO SCALE
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
E = EXPANSION
F = FIXED
EJ = EXPANSION JOINT
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
HORIZONTAL SCALE
BRIDGE FILE
AS NOTED
1265-0-08572
VERTICAL SCALE
DESIGNATION
AS NOTED
1-265
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
10/07/13
PL005
SHEET NO.
06
01
OYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
VERSION
JDT 03.03 DWG 5.ALL STR 53005
R-00
13
t 'KY84I'—f
—
\
KY84I NORTHBOUND
31
/
_
S4-A2-52
\
1
,4
S4-A2-52A
24" PIPE —
A2
66'PIPE
4-A2-53A
PIP
' *ro*u
STORM
STOKU
s„f>= STOtt.
24* PIPE
24' PIPE
S4-A2-52B
STORM
PIPE
18" PIPE
-
18- PIPE
NOISE WALL
--
sro*,
•
CONTROL BOX FOR HYDROCARBON —
SENSOR (SEE TUNNEL MECHANICAL
DRAWING FOR DETAILS)
STORMWATER TREATMENT & SPILL
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
Sil^Aa.-5'l
Z
Z
XJ
A
•P
STqru
B
sronu
AZSTOPK,
EXISTINC GROUND
EXISTING GROUND
CONTROL BOX FOR HYDROCARBON
SENSOR (SEE TUNNEL MECHANICAL
DRAWING FOR DETAILS)
/
«:/
?!
Z3
t:l
INSTALL A VENT PIPE AT
EACH CORNER OF THE
BOX PER MECHANICAL
DRAWING-AIR MONITORING
SYSTEM.
NBML
5£
S3 2
NBML
2. THE BOX SUPPLIER SHALL CONTACT THE
ENGINEER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE BOX DESIGN
MANUAL CONTROL GATE
5
BYPASS MANHOLE
WITH WEIR
'3
ft
S4-A2-53
STA. 133+53.25. (69.79' RT.) (KY841)
CONST. MANHOLE TYPE C
W/ 8.83'x4.0'x8.50' PIPE CHAMBER
T/G 463.58
I.E. 443.12 (AH & BK)
66' STORM SEWER PIPE
II
II
18' STORM
SEWER PIPE
Jt
S4-A2-53A
STA. 133+68.42, (69.68'RT.) (KY84I)
CONST. MANHOLE TYPE C
W/ 8.83'x4.0'x8.50' PIPE CHAMBER
T/G 463.82
I.E. 436.53 (AH)
66'STORM
I.E. 443.06 (BK)
SEWER PIPE
S4-A2-54
STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
& SPILL CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
(VORTECHS PCI42I OR APPROVED EOUAL
BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.)
18' STORM
SEWER PIPE
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
S4-A2-54
STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
& SPILL CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
(VORTECHS PCI42I OR APPROVED EOUAL
BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.)
3. THE BOX SUPPLIER SHALL ALSO PROVIDE THE
DETAILED SHOP DRAWING AND STRUCTURAL
CALCULATIONS
SIGNED AND SEALED BY A
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE
STATE OF KENTUCKY.
4. CONTRACTOR INSTALLS A MANUAL CONTROL
SLUICE GATE PURCHASED FROM FONTAINE OR
APPROVED EOUAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.
5. FOLLOW THE SUPPLIER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTING STORMWATER TREATMENT BOX,
BYPASS MANHOLE AND MANUAL CONTROL SLUICE
GATE.
SECTION B-B
NTS
SECTION A-A
NTS
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. THE BOX SUPPLIER SHALL DESIGN STORMWATER
TREATMENT BOX AND BYPASS MANHOLE TO
ACCOMMODATE THE WATER OUALITY PROTECTION
VOLUME BASED ON I IN. OF RAINFALL.
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
w
CONSTRUCTION
I"=I5'
4^%
V^JA
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
/7
jf
RESPONSIPOF ENGINEER
j/
K
Fj _
„
Z
/T:
\S
_HQ_
jy_
_LL
Indiana Finance Authority]
DATE
ft
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
NTS
KY84I
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
DRAINAGE DETAIL
STORMWATER TREATMENT DETAIL
03/26/20I4
PDS046
SHEET NO.
204
Of
36!
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
VERSION
JDT 03.03 OWG 4.R02 DRN 42023
R-00
l
0
KY84I NORTHBOUND
:XJ"V
•
N 430
. • . ..-V
ED
06V
A4
20'
-\I^LV.V.V" • • • • - • •
490
•' •*
:V
CULVERT;—'
S'kfrBOx Cdtvi
• • • • ' •- •
490
;;;;)
490
A
V
S4 A4
480
36
480
STORU
S4.-A*.-6
St OR*
5TC«
A%°
JS-P.IPT.
V
3
17 M
—
I
R
*3B£BBBS£5FFL:''.I iw
y
$/
POND
N.
— X
470
BBSS' ''2
CLASS IV CHANNEL' LINING
050 = 0. 5 , T = 1:5'
• 469.0
O
S LT TRAP TYPE
W
B
POND
LIMIT OF IMPERMEABLE LAYER
V
FOREBAY
A
EXISTING GROUND —
450
PONO
©
wmAimi
—Y-
x>
(
SECTION A-A
<GSG-
fr?
NOTES!
%
GENCY SPILLWAY
I. SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS050 FOR POND
CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL.
09V
POND HYDRAULIC DATA:
Q2IN= 13.7 CFS, Q20UT= 0.8 CFS
010IN= 20.3 CFS. 0100UT = 1.1 CFS
050IN= 28.2 CFS. 0500UT= 1.3 CFS
OIOOIN= 32.0 CFS. OIOOOUT= 1.4 CFS
WATER OUALITY VOLUME- 0.20 AC-FT
SPILL CONTAINMENT VOLUME= 26.000 GAL (0.08 AC-FT)
460
A
.
•
.0.0
490
500
SILT TRAP TYPE B
TOP EL. 472.00
480
r- a
n
23
5^/
^ HW2- 471.7
HWIO= 472.8
HW50= 473.9
L-5*
HWIOO= 474.5
469.7
480
~|
SECTION D-D
NTS
24' STORM
SEWER PIPE
430
460
440.
450.
*M
EL. 480.0
EL. 469.0
l2l'-24' STORM SEWER PIPE
In
POND A
470
H
88
OU
EL. 475.0—v
EL. 475.0
S4-A4-7 I
STA. 153+04.68. 072.11' RT.) (KY84I)
CONST. POND CONTROL STRUCTURE
T/G 475.00
I.E. 468
EX ST NG GROUND
\
CLASS IV CHANNEL
LINING
050 = 1.0'. T = 3.0'
24LST0RM SEWER PIPE
BOTTOM EL. 469.0
460
INSTALL INTERMEDIATE ANCHOR
PER RDX-060-03
490
S4-A4-7
POND A
470
EL. 476.0
S4-A4-3
CLASS IV CHANNEL LINING
I 12' I
STA.-I50+50.00, (79.04' RT.) (KY84I)
h*
H
D50 = 0.5'. T = 1.5'
CONST. DROP BOX INLET TYPE I
BOTTOM EL. 469.0
T/G 487.67
T7E. 479.93 IRT)
EXISTING GROUND
S4-A4-5
I.E. 483.50 (BK)
STA. 151 + 34.68. (168. 39' RT.) (KY84I)
CONST. 24" HEADWALL 0* SKEW
I.E. 469.00
SECTION E-E
NTS
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY TYPICAL
I4
20
40
60
50
2 S
K. £
100
120
140
160
180
220
200
240
260
280
2C
60
80
REV
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE:
DESCRIPTION
120
160
180
SECTION C-C
SECTION B-B
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
100
140
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
DATE
w
CONSTRUCTION
l' = 20'
Q3/26/20I4
? (
{
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
\
}
ENGMEEN
'
:
Jo: •
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
HP
YJ
DATE
f
Indiana Finance Authority
CHECKED:
JH
YJ
KY84I
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
DRAINAGE DETAIL
POND A DETAIL
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PDS047
SHEET NO.
205 of
361
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
VERSION
JDT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 DRN 42024
R-00
^7
KY84I NORTHBOUND
77T7T
vSC.V-.V.
.--.Q
'
490
^-OEF
I
'
•
I
< * >- \ . . . . . . . . . . .
<*>
<90
--
S4-A4-4ffr
067
PITCH .13rBT
~==
-- - •
::::::::}}}l
30'
<30
SILT IK
B
<90
490
490
X
POND
XO^
A
A4
FOREBAY
^482=
485
===
POND
CLASS
D50
G
CH
fV
061
LINING
•80
•7£>
I»P
•70
IMPERMEABLE LINING
067
EMERGENCY SP L WAY
B
0
£
PROP
.10
•80
480
R/W
•IS
.90
.60
•90
S
.I°
V'
O
470
<>o
V6
G>
.10
•70
&
•Jo
V
XO5
»FCO
«O^-
A
•L
7
EL. 484
'TOM E LEVATION 478.00
470
EL. 485
A
,
EL. 484—v
CLASS IV CHANNEL LINING
D50 = 1.0', T = 3.0'
EXIST NG GROUND
.
EL.
—"
SECT ON D-D
NTS
30'
R. O
n
20
40
?, 2
60
80
100
120
HW10- 482.5
_*_HWWOV- 479.
'RCP STORM SEWER PIFE
!
!
o o
I. SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS050 FOR
POND CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL.
SILT TRAP TYPE BTOP EL. 483.00
_X_HW50= 483.5
—3C_HW2= 481.5
NOTES:
TYPICAL SPILLWAY DETAIL
SECTION C-C
NTS
130
SECTION B-B
HWIOO- 484,0
POND HYDRAULIC OATA:
02IN= 54.4 CFS, 020UT = 15.0 CFS
0I0IN= 79.3 CFS. OIOOUT = 19.0 CFS
050IN= 109.3 CFS. 0500UT= 22.4 CFS
0100IN= 124.0 CFS. OIOOOUT= 23.9 CFS
WATER OUALITY V0LUME= 1.26 AC-FT
SPILL CONTAINMENT VOLUME= 26.000 GAL (0.08 AC-FT)
CLASS IV CHANNEL LINING
D50 = 1.0', T = 3.0'
POND B-FOREBAY
PONO B
BOTTOM ELEVAT ON 478.
S4-A4-9
••83.75. 184.93' RT; (KY84I)
POND CONTROLSTRUCTURE L
EXISTING GROUNDS
/G 4
00
^ _ _ _ _ _
7.00
OO
52 52
« O
II
20
40
80
IOC
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
500
320
340
J60
580
400
420
440
460
480
500
620
540
560
580
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
740
760
780
800
82C
840
860
873
SECTION A-A
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
6/20
LEAD ENGINEER
.IIII"NI.
DESCRIPTION
wv
CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGE FILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
l' = 30'
3/25/2QI4
YEONTAE
JEONG
PE-29310
ENGINEER
la::
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
HP
YJ
DATE
Indiana Finance Authority]
ft
CHECKED:
JH
YJ
KY84I
N/A
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DRAWN:
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
DRAINAGE DETAIL
POND B DETAIL
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PDS048
SHEET NO.
206 Oi
361
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
VERSION
JOT D3.03 DWG 4.R02 DRN 42025
R-00
X
•••A
\
/
JL
%
6,281.2™
t KY841-
mm
a-*
KY84I
• \ _
• • A
CD
- .
: T
\
...\.v:::
30'
r •*
S4 w.
6;'x5
RT
BOX CUL
•V
«-
STOW
STORM
S4.LA4-4'
StORU
S4?A4:6;
24 RCP
?<•
Sr0?M
\
A
POND
' Of •;24' R C P
4
Off*
410
>
A4
POND
<90
4*0
<60
Outfall S4-A4-4A
08•
t
0»
L'.-V
450
Q
-W;
500
500,-
490
480; S4-A4-4AA
r
STA. 51+36.29. 27.55' RT. (RIVERRO)
CONST. 36* HEADWALL 0* SKEW
r£H53719
I
I
470
PROP. WW
68'-24" RCP-&TORMISEWER [PIPE
s =
460:
S4-A4-4
STA. 51+97.77. 83.29'
CON .T, MANHC
TYPE B
W/ 5.0' CONE RISER
T/C 469.56
I.E. 459.00
I.E.456.00
1
L
24' STORM —v
SEWER-PIPE
^0-
490
247'-24* RCf
24' STORMTSEWER RCP
~S = 1.797.
280—24* RCP ST DRMSE WER PI
S4-A4-6
STA. 153+05.11, 150.52'RT. (KY841)
MANHOLE TYPE B
:ONE RISER
S6
.00 (B« I.E. 464.00 (AH)
I.E. 467.00 (LT)
A4-1A
450'
STA 51+ 71.06. 18. 75'LT. (RIVERRO)CONST. DROP BOX INLET TYPE 2
/G 462.00
E. 454.176 (BK>
|
I
E. 453.76 (AH)
440
430„
E
20
CONCRETE COLLAR
(SEE ORAINAGE DETAIL PDS040)
100
120
140
160
180
40
£.
I4'-36*RCP STORM
SEWER PIPE
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
LEAD ENGINEER
DATE
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
43' OF EXIST. 1-36- STORM SEWER RCP
(TO REMAIN)
CONCRETE COLLAR
(SEE ORAINAGE DETAIL PDS040)
REV.
—U S4-A4-8
j—STA.^155+39.00, 129.68 RT. (KY84I)
CONST. MANHOLE TYPE 3 !
W/ 5.0'CONE RISER
—I-T/G 485.46
- ItET^473;OOABK)
: I.E. 469.00 :(AJJ>_ -C
r —— "
1.73'/.
.84'/.
DESCRIPTION
440
460
480
500
520
480
231—24" RCP STORM-7
SEWER PIPE
T
5 = 2.02'/T
r
S4-A4-9
STA.-157+83.75. 184.93'RT. (KY841)
PONO CONTROL STRUCTURE
T/G 484.00
I
I.E. 477.00
4 70
460
450
1 440
540
560
580
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
740
760
780
800
SECTION A-A
820
840
860
880
900
920
NOTES:
I. SEE DRAINAGE DETAIL PDS050 FOR
POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE.
\\v
CONSTRUCTION
.iiH'iiii,,
BRIDGE RLE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
POO»<<>/
vi-
>03/26/2014
Indiana Finance Authority]
DESIGNATION
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
Z*\
PE-29310
.'CT.
Ohio River Bridges - East End Crossing
DESIGNED:
HP
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
YJ
CHECKED:
JH
DRAINAGE DETAIL
''>?!pNH.gxS
YJ
POND OUTFALL DETAIL
KY 841
DRAWING DATE
DWG. NO.
03/26/2014
PDS049
207 01
DYMADOC DOCUMENT CODE
JOT 03.03 OWG 4.R02 DRN 42026
R-00
361
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
72 of 76
Appendix C
Water Quality Protection Volume Calculations (HEC-HMS Input and Output)
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
73 of 76
Information source – Appendix G Section 4 Drainage report JDT D3.03 RPT 4.R03 DRN 42106 R01
Note : S. Harrods = Storm Water treatment Box
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
74 of 76
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
75 of 76
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
OHIO RIVER BRIDGES - KENTUCKY SECTION
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA - DRAINAGE DOCUMENTATION
Doc n°:
Rev.
Date
Page
WVC D3.03 RPT 4.ALL DRN 10001
R-02
June 25,2014
76 of 76
UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED
Attachment 5 - Current Permits
LEONARD K. PETERS
STEVEN L. BESHEAR
SECRETARY
GOVERNOR
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET
DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
DIVISION OF WATER
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 4TH FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601
www.kentucky.gov
April 8, 2013
David Sikorski
WVB East End Partners
1302 Port Rd
Jeffersonville, IN 47130
Re: KYR10 Coverage Acknowledgment
KPDES No.: KYR10H336
Ohio River Bridges – Section 4 & 5
Permit Type: Construction
AI ID: 115698
Jefferson County, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Sikorski:
The discharges associated with the Notice of Intent you submitted have been approved for coverage under the “Kentucky Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (KPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities
(KYR10)” permit. This coverage becomes effective the date of this correspondence and will remain effective until the general permit
expires or the Division of Water revokes coverage. During this period of coverage all discharges shall comply with the conditions of
the applicable general permit. A copy of the general permit the operator is now covered by can be found on our website:
http://water.ky.gov.
Any questions concerning the general permit and its requirements should be directed to me at (502) 564-3410.
Facility Site: East End Prospect area of Louisville near Ohio River, Prospect (Jefferson County), KY 40059
Sincerely,
Emily Hogue
KPDES Branch
Division of Water
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
STEVEN L. BESHEAR
GOVERNOR
LEONARD K. PETERS
SECRETARY
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET
DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
DIVISION OF WATER
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 4TH FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601
www.kentucky.gov
May 7, 2013
Indiana Department of Transportation
Attention: Thomas Warrner
100 North Senate Avenue, Room N642
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Re:
Water Quality Certification #2013-017-7M
Louisville- Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges
Project, East End Bridge Sections 4 & 5
USACE ID No.: LRL-2011-375-cmh
AI No.: 115698; Activity ID: APE20120002
UTs of and Harrods Creek, Ohio River
Jefferson County, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Warrner:
Pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Commonwealth of Kentucky certifies it
has reasonable assurances that applicable water quality standards under Kentucky Administrative
Regulations Title 401, Chapter 10, established pursuant to Sections 301, 302, 303, 304, 306, and 307 of the
CWA, will not be violated by the above referenced project provided that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
authorizes the activity under 33 CFR part 330, and the attached conditions are met. Please review of the
materials carefully.
All future correspondence on this project must reference AI No. 115698. The attached document is
your official Water Quality Certification; please read it carefully. If you should have any questions
concerning the conditions of this water quality certification, please contact Chloe Tewksbury at (502) 5643410 Extension 4863 or Chloe.Tewksbury@ky.gov.
Sincerely,
Barbara Scott, Supervisor
Water Quality Certification Section
Kentucky Division of Water
BJS:CT
Attachments
cc:
Gregory McKay, USACE: Louisville District (via email: Gregory.A.McKay@usace.army.mil)
Philip Banton, Parsons (via email: Phillip.Banton@parsons.com)
Thomas Warrner, INDOT (via email: twarrner@indot.in.gov)
Gina Morris, Third Rock Consultants (via email: gmorris@thirdrockconsultants.com)
Lee Andrews, USFWS: Frankfort (via email: Teresa_Welch@fws.gov
Jenny Owen, Salt River Basin Coordinator (via email: Jenny.Owen@ky.gov)
Danny Peake, KYTC (via email: Danny.Peake@ky.gov)
David Waldner, KYTC (via email:David.Waldner@ky.gov)
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
Water Quality Certification
East End Bridge - Jefferson Co
Facility Requirements
Permit Number:WQC #2013-017-7M
Activity ID No.: APE20120002
Page 1 of 3
ACTV0000000001 (UTs to Harrods Creek, Harrods Creek, Ohio River) Louisville- Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project, East End
Approach and Bridge Over the Ohio River- Kentucky:
Submittal/Action Requirements:
Condition
No.
Condition
S-1
Indiana Department of Transportation shall submit notification: Due prior to any construction activity that involves the discharge of fill materials into jurisdictional
surface waters of the Commonwealth to the Kentucky Division of Water, 401 Water Quality Certification Project Manager. This notification shall include proof of
purchase of a total of 1.86 Adjusted Mitigation Units as compensatory mitigation for impacts to 0.774 acre of wetland associated with the proposed project. The
Adjusted Mitigation Units shall be purchased from the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Wetland and Stream Mitigation Program. The in-lieu
fee payment shall be calculated as total Adjusted Mitigation Units multiplied by the current monetary rate. The U.S. Army of Corps of Engineers may have different
compensatory mitigation requirements; however, the greater amount shall be purchased. [Clean Water Act]
S-2
Indiana Department of Transportation shall submit notification: Due when construction is complete to the Kentucky Division of Water, 401 Water Quality
Certification Project Manager at 502-564-3410. [Clean Water Act]
S-3
Other permits may be required from the Division of Water for this project. If this project takes place within the floodplain, a permit may be required from the
Surface Water Permits Branch. The contact person is Todd Powers. If this project will disturb one acre or more of land, or is part of a larger common plan of
development or sale that will ultimately disturb one acre or more of land, a KPDES general storm water permit will be required from the Surface Water Permits
Branch. The contact person is Cassie Campbell. Both can be reached at 502/564-3410. [Clean Water Act]
S-4
A copy of the in-lieu fee receipt paid to the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Wetland and Stream Mitigation Program must be submitted to the
401 Water Quality Certification Project Manager before the fillings of jurisdictional waters begins. [Clean Water Act]
Water Quality Certification
East End Bridge - Jefferson Co
Facility Requirements
Permit Number:WQC #2013-017-7M
Activity ID No.: APE20120002
Page 2 of 3
ACTV0000000001 (continued):
Narrative Requirements:
Condition
No.
T-1
Condition
The work approved by this certification shall be limited to the jurisdictional impacts associated with the Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project,
East End Bridge Project, Section 4 (the Kentucky approach to the East End bridge) and 5 (the East End Bridge over the Ohio River). A new bridge and approach
roadways connecting KY 841 (Gene Snyder Freeway) and eastern Jefferson County, Kentucky with S.R. 265 (Lee Hamilton Highway) in eastern Clark County,
Indiana (Alignment A-15). This alternative includes interchanges at U.S. 42 in Kentucky and at Salem Road and S.R. 265/S.R. 62 in Indiana. Total project impacts
include the following:
- 155 linear feet of an unnamed, perennial tributary to Harrods Creek (culverting)
- 100 linear feet of Harrods Creek, a perennial stream (piers)
- 177 linear feet of Ohio River (piers)
- 0.554 acre of palustrine emergent wetland (right-of-way fill)
- 0.220 acre of palustrine forested wetland (right-of-way fill)
. [Clean Water Act]
T-2
The Kentucky Division of Water requires compensatory mitigation for the wetland losses associated with this project. A total of 1.86 wetland Adjusted Mitigation
Units shall be purchased from the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Wetland and Stream Mitigation Program. The in-lieu fee payment shall be
calculated as total Adjusted Mitigation Units multiplied by the current monetary rate. The U.S. Army of Corps of Engineers may have different compensatory
mitigation requirements; however, the greater amount shall be purchased. [Clean Water Act]
T-3
All work performed under this certification shall adhere to following documents:
- The design and specifications set forth in the Section 401 Permit Application for the Louisville-Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project, Section 4Construction of New East End Approach- Kentucky, Section 5- Construction of New East End Bridge- Kentucky, received January 29, 2013.
- The Summary of Stream and Wetland Impacts, East End Bridge Kentucky, Section 4 and 5 Mitigation Calculation Table, submitted via electronic mail on
February 7, 2013. [Clean Water Act]
T-4
Indiana Department of Transportation is responsible for preventing degradation of waters of the Commonwealth from soil erosion. An erosion and sedimentation
control plan must be designed, implemented, and maintained in effective operating condition at all times during construction. Exposed soils and other fills must be
stabilized at the earliest practicable date. [Clean Water Act]
T-5
The Division of Water reserves the right to modify or revoke this certification should it be determined that the activity is in noncompliance with any condition set
forth in this certification. [Clean Water Act]
Water Quality Certification
East End Bridge - Jefferson Co
Facility Requirements
Permit Number:WQC #2013-017-7M
Activity ID No.: APE20120002
ACTV0000000001 (continued):
Page 3 of 3
Narrative Requirements:
Condition
No.
Condition
T-6
If construction does not commence within two years of the date of this letter, this certification will become void. A letter requesting a renewal should be submitted.
[Clean Water Act]
T-7
Dredging work shall not be conducted during the fish spawning season, April 15th through June 15th. [Clean Water Act]
T-8
Mitigation for impacts shall begin prior to or concurrently with impacts. [Clean Water Act]
T-9
Check dams are not allowed within the stream channel. [Clean Water Act]
T-10
Remove all sediment and erosion control measures after re-vegetation has become well-established. [Clean Water Act]
STEPHEN L.
BESHEAR
GOVERNOR
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET
D EPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
D IVISION OF W ATER
200 F AIR OAKS LANE
F RANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601
www.kent ucky.gov
LEONARD K. PETERS
SECRETARY
ATTENTION APPLICANT
If your project involves one or more of the following
activities, you may need more than one permit from
the Kentucky Division of Water.
*building in a floodplain
*road culvert in a stream
*streambank stabilization *stream cleanout
*utility line crossing a stream
*construction sites an acre or more
• If the project will disturb one acre or more of land, or is part of a larger
common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one acre
or more of land, a Kentucky Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(KPDES) stormwater permit shall be required from the Operational
Permits Section. This permit requires the creation of an erosion control
plan.
Contact Allen Ingram.
•
Projects that involve filling in the floodplain will require a stream
construction permit from the Floodplain Management Section.
Contact Todd Powers.
•
Projects that involve work IN a stream, such as bank stabilization, road
culverts, utility line crossings, and stream alteration will require a stream
construction permit and a Water Quality Certification from the Water
Quality Certification Section.
Contact Barbara Scott.
All three contacts listed above can be reached at 502/564-3410. A complete
listing of environmental programs administered by the Kentucky Department
for Environmental Protection is available from Pete Goodman by calling
502/564-3410.
Kentucky UnbridledSpirit.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
GENERAL CONDI TIONS FOR WATER QUALI TY CERTI FICATION
1.
The Kentucky Division o f Water may require submission o f a form al application for an Individual
Certifi cation fo r any project i f the p roject has b een determined to likely h ave a signifi cant advers e effect
upon water qu ality or degrade th e wat ers o f the Commonwealth so that existing uses o f the water body or
downstream waters are precluded.
2.
Nationwide permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for projects in Outstanding State Resource
Waters, Cold Water Aquatic Habitats, and Exceptional Waters as defined by 401 KAR 10:026 shall require
individual water quality certifications.
3.
Erosion and sedimentation pollution control plans and Best Management Practices must be designed,
installed, and maintained in effective operating condition at all times during construction activities so that
violations of state water quality standards do not occur.
4.
Sediment and erosion control measures (e.g., check-dams, silt fencing, or hay bales) shall not be placed
within surface waters o f the Commonwealth, either temporarily or p erman ently, without prior approval by
the Kentu cky Division o f Water’s Water Quality Certifi cation Section. If placement o f sediment and
erosion control measures in su rface waters is unavoidable, placement sh all not be condu cted in such a
manner th at may caus e instability o f streams that are adjacent to, upstream, or downstream o f the
structures. All sediment and erosion control measures shall be removed and the natural grade restored prior
to withdrawal from the site.
5.
Measures shall be tak en to prevent or control spills of fu els, lubricants, or other toxic materials used in
construction from entering the watercou rse.
6.
To the maximum extent practicable, all in-stream wo rk und er this certi fication shall be perform ed during
low flow.
7.
Heavy equipment (e.g. bulldozers, backhoes, draglines, etc.), if required for this project, should not be used
or operated within the stream channel. In those instances where such in-stream work is unavoidable, then it
shall be p erfo rmed in such a m anner and duration as to minimize re-suspension o f sediments and
disturbance to the channel, banks, or riparian vegetation.
8.
If there are water supply intak es located do wnstream that may be affected by increased turbidity, the
permittee shall notify the operator when work will be performed.
9.
Removal of existing riparian veget ation should be restricted to the minimum necessary fo r project
construction.
10. Should stream pollution, wetland impairment, and/or violations of water quality standards occur as a result
of this activity (either from a spill or other fo rms of water pollution), the Kentucky Division of Water shall
be notified immediately by calling 800/564-2380.
STEVEN L. BESHEAR
GOVERNOR
LEONARD K. PETERS
SECRETARY
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET
DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
DIVISION OF WATER
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 4TH FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601
www.kentucky.gov
April 7, 2014
Indiana Department of Transportation
Attention: Thomas Warner
100 North Senate Avenue, Room N642
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Re:
Nationwide Permit No. 15
Ohio River Bridges Project, East End Crossing,
Section 5, Bridge Design Modification Request
Reference: WQC #2013-017-7M; USACE ID
No. LRL-2011-375-cmh
AI No.: 115698; Activity ID: APE20140001
Ohio River, River Mile 595
Jefferson County, Kentucky
Dear Mr. Warner:
This letter transmits to you a copy of our General Water Quality Certification for Nationwide Permit
# 15 for U.S. Coast Guard Approved Bridges for authorization regarding the proposed plans for bridge
design modification from the concrete cable-stayed bridge with mono-leg towers to the diamond tower steel
composite cable-stayed bridge. The length of impact proposed is estimated to be 118 feet. An individual
Water Quality Certification is not necessary for this activity provided that this project has received the
appropriate Nationwide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and all conditions of the attached
General Water Quality Certification are met.
Although an Individual WQC is not needed, other permits from the Division of Water may be
required. If this activity occurs within a floodplain, a Permit to Construct Across or Along a Stream may be
required. Please contact Todd Powers (502-564-3410) for more information. If the project will disturb one
acre or more of land, or is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb
one acre or more of land, a Kentucky Pollution Discharge Elimination System (KPDES) stormwater permit
shall be required from the Surface Water Permits Branch. This permit requires the development of a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP must include erosion prevention and sediment
control measures. Contact: Surface Water Permits Branch (SWPB) Support (502-564-3410 or
SWPBSupport@ky.gov)
All future correspondence on this project must reference AI No. 115698. If you should have any
questions concerning this letter, please contact me at Chloe.Brantley@ky.gov or (502) 564-3410 Extension
4863.
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
Sincerely,
Chloe Brantley, Project Manager
Water Quality Certification Section
Kentucky Division of Water
AJ:CB
Attachments
cc:
Gregory McKay, USACE: Louisville District (via email: Gregory.A.McKay@usace.army.mil)
Charles Hagan, USACE: Louisville District (via email: Charles.M.Hagan@usace.army.mil)
Philip Banton, Parsons (via email: Phillip.Banton@parsons.com)
Thomas Warrner, INDOT (via email: twarrner@indot.in.gov)
Danny Peake, KYTC (via email: Danny.Peake@ky.gov)
David Waldner, KYTC (via email:David.Waldner@ky.gov)